Archibald, Gray & McKay Ltd.

Archibald, Gray & McKay Ltd. Intelligence, Employees & Contact Signals

Contact coverage
Email-led
Visible profile or company source data is strongest for email outreach. 3 visible profiles include direct contact evidence.
People graph depth
6 signals
Deep profile graph across 1 mapped department.
Account research
6 steps
Account research checklist combines best covered outreach path, buying-committee coverage, ICP fit, technology workforce evidence, related-company graph, and domain trust; raw contact values are hidden.
Technology talent
2
Technology-oriented role signals in the workforce graph.
Evidence quality 100/100 Priority intelligence record

AeroLeads company intelligence

Archibald, Gray & McKay Ltd. workforce and contactability signals

Evidence from AeroLeads company records, matched professional profiles, and related company graph.

High confidence
Intelligence completeness
Strong intelligence record
8 of 11 major intelligence groups are available for this company.
Largest mapped team
General
6 profile signals in General.
Departments mapped
1
Workforce composition from AeroLeads profile data.
Profile graph
Deep profile graph
6 mapped workforce signals against a 20 employee size estimate.
Top reachable team
General
1 visible contact signal.
Top seniority band
Individual contributor
4 of 6 classified profile signals.
Visible contact sample
3
Displayed people with email or phone data.

Profile graph researchability

Visible people graph includes 6 visible people: 6 named, 6 titled, 6 located, and 3 contactable.

Multi-signal profile graph
Profile coverage evidence tier: Deep profile coverage evidence. Profile coverage evidence combines 6 mapped workforce signals, 20 employee size estimate, and 30.0% profile graph coverage.
High-confidence profile graph evidence: Researchability is based on 6 visible people with 4 populated evidence dimensions: named, titled, located, and contactable signals.
Profile association confidence: Corroborated profile association. Association confidence combines 6 titled profiles, 2 official-domain email profiles, 2 titled profiles with official-domain email, 2 located profiles with official-domain email, and 3 contactable profiles.
People
6
Named
6
Titled
6
Located
6
Contactable
3

Data methodology

AeroLeads renders only source-backed fields for this company page.

5 source groups
Company record Matched profile graph Email-pattern aggregate Related company graph Company signal fields
Blank source fields are omitted
Related companies are ordered deterministically
Structured data uses aggregate counts only

Intelligence completeness

8 of 11 major intelligence groups are available for this company.

8 / 11 groups
Strong intelligence record 72.7%
Workforce composition Contactability Email intelligence Decision makers Buying committee Technology talent Domain confidence Market and peer context

Evidence quality

This page clears the 60+ AeroLeads company-intelligence evidence threshold.

100 / 100
Priority intelligence record Threshold 60+
Workforce composition Employee email coverage Department contactability Role title reachability Official-domain role title reachability Decision-maker coverage
Workforce graph
25 signals
Workforce composition, Department contactability, Role title reachability
Contactability
13 signals
Employee email coverage, Email pattern intelligence, Email usability mix
Decision-maker intelligence
10 signals
Decision-maker coverage, Leadership signals, Department leadership coverage
Technology intelligence
2 signals
Technology talent, Technology leadership
Market and peer context
13 signals
Related company graph, Peer graph strength, Peer position benchmark
Company momentum
3 signals
Company signal breadth, Company momentum score, Company ownership signal
Source trust
11 signals
Domain confidence, Multi-source domain alignment, Intelligence completeness
71 additional source-backed evidence signals are counted in this page quality score.

Prospecting readiness

Archibald, Gray & McKay Ltd. shows strong prospecting fit based on person-level contact coverage, best covered outreach path, decision-maker coverage, and technology workforce evidence.

85 / 100
Strong prospecting fit High-confidence prospecting evidence

Prospecting evidence combines person-level contact coverage, best covered outreach path, decision-maker coverage, technology workforce evidence, and people graph depth; raw contact values are hidden.

ICP fit
Strong ICP fit

ICP fit combines company size, market specificity, contactability, buying committee, and technology path; raw contact values are hidden.

85 / 100
Company size
20 employees
Employee estimate is in a common outbound prospecting range.
Market specificity
Tagged market profile
2 category and specialty signals in the company record.
Reachability
High-confidence contact evidence
2 current or verified professional email signals, 3 company-domain email signals, and email-led contact coverage; raw addresses and numbers are hidden.
Buying committee
Mapped buying committee
Mapped decision-maker signals span 1 business function.
Technology path
Mapped technology evidence
2 matched technology role signals found in the workforce graph.
Account research checklist
Multi-step account research checklist

Account research checklist combines best covered outreach path, buying-committee coverage, ICP fit, technology workforce evidence, related-company graph, and domain trust; raw contact values are hidden.

6 steps
Confirm contact path
General + Manager
Outreach path evidence combines 1 visible General contact signal, 1 contactable Manager decision-maker signal, and 1 official-domain decision-maker email signal; raw contacts are hidden.
Map reachable buying committee
Mapped buying committee
Buying-committee evidence combines 1 mapped buying-committee function and Technology / data function coverage.
Validate ICP fit
Strong ICP fit
ICP fit combines company size, market specificity, contactability, buying committee, and technology path; raw contact values are hidden.
Review technology path
Mapped technology evidence
2 matched technology role signals found in the workforce graph.
Compare related peers
Limited peer comparison
Compares this company with related-company evidence across employee scale and peer graph evidence.
Check domain trust
High-confidence domain alignment
Domain evidence combines website domain, social profile, employee email alignment, profile-domain association, and company email sample; raw email addresses are hidden.
Contact coverage
High-confidence contact evidence
2 current or verified professional email signals, 3 company-domain email signals, and email-led contact coverage; raw addresses and numbers are hidden.
Best outreach path
General + Manager
Coverage combines 1 visible General contact signal, 1 contactable Manager decision-maker signal, and 1 official-domain decision-maker email signal.
Decision-maker coverage
Mapped buying committee
Mapped decision-maker signals span 1 business function.
Technology contact path
Mapped technology evidence
2 matched technology role signals found in the workforce graph.

Domain trust signals

Domain confidence for agm.on.ca is based on website domain, social profile, employee email alignment, profile-domain association, and company email sample.

90 / 100
High-confidence domain alignment High-confidence domain evidence

Domain evidence combines website domain, social profile, employee email alignment, profile-domain association, and company email sample; raw email addresses are hidden.

Website domain
agm.on.ca
The official website domain is available from the company source record.
Social profile
LinkedIn organization page
A LinkedIn organization page is present for this company record.
Employee email alignment
2 official-domain email signals
28% of visible employee email signals match agm.on.ca; raw addresses are hidden.
Profile-domain association
2 people with official-domain email
Matched people include official-domain email evidence; raw addresses are hidden.
Company email sample
3 official-domain source email records
Company-level email source records include official-domain coverage; raw addresses are hidden.

AeroLeads coverage snapshot

Profile sample
4
Visible people attached to this company page.
Profile graph depth
Deep profile graph
6 mapped workforce signals against a 20 employee size estimate.
Contactable sample
3
Visible people with email or phone data.
Contact channel mix
Email-led contact coverage
Visible profile or company source data is strongest for email outreach.
Contact evidence confidence
High-confidence contact evidence
2 current or verified professional email signals, 3 company-domain email signals, and email-led contact coverage; raw addresses and numbers are hidden.
Department coverage
1
Departments represented in AeroLeads workforce signals.
Leadership signals
2
Department lead or leadership signals in the org data.
Department leadership coverage
Focused department leadership coverage
Leadership signals appear in 1 of 1 mapped departments.
Leadership density
33.30
Percent of mapped department signals that are leadership signals.
Department contact coverage
1
Departments with visible contact samples.
Department contact spread
Focused department contact spread
Visible contact samples appear in 1 of 1 mapped departments.
Technology talent
2
Visible profiles matching technology role patterns.
Technology evidence confidence
Mapped technology evidence
2 matched technology role signals found in the workforce graph.
Email-pattern variants
2
Distinct matched business email patterns.
Official-domain emails
2
Email signals matching agm.on.ca.
Email domain confidence
Mixed-domain coverage
Visible email signals include official-domain and non-official domains.
Domain confidence
High-confidence domain alignment
Domain confidence for agm.on.ca is based on website domain, social profile, employee email alignment, profile-domain association, and company email sample.
Email usability mix
Current email coverage sample
AeroLeads source data includes 7 unique visible email signals; 2 are marked current or verified and 2 are professional-type. Raw addresses are hidden.
Contact freshness
Dated contact metadata
AeroLeads source data includes 3 dated contact records; 0 fall within 90 days and 0 fall within 12 months of the Jun 2026 source update. Raw emails and phone numbers are hidden.
Contact data safety
Corroborated privacy-safe contact intelligence
AeroLeads exposes contact counts, channel mix, freshness, and domain-alignment evidence while hiding raw email addresses and masking phone numbers in public output.
Official-domain contact freshness
Dated official-domain contact metadata
3 dated official-domain email records; 0 fall within 12 months of the Jun 2026 source update.
Company signal breadth
Two-signal company record
Company-level signals include social audience and ownership.
Company momentum score
Limited company momentum score
Momentum score blends contactability and peer position from AeroLeads company and profile evidence.
Company ownership signal
Private company record
Company source record includes source type Privately Held.
Audience density
Low audience density
307 followers against 20 employee estimate, about 15.30 followers per estimated employee.
Specialty signals
1
Specialty tags in the company record.
Market specificity
Tagged market profile
2 category and specialty signals in the company record.
Peer industry clusters
7
Industries represented by related company records.
Related companies
10
Company graph links available for comparison.
Industry benchmark
Peer-informed industry benchmark
Industry benchmark uses 10 related companies, 3 benchmark dimensions, and 3 peer evidence types from the AeroLeads related-company graph.
Peer benchmark confidence
Multi-signal peer benchmark evidence
Peer benchmark combines 10 related companies with peer graph strength, size benchmark, and size position. Underlying peer graph includes 3 evidence types: employee benchmarks, website records, social profiles.
Peer position benchmark
Employee-scale peer position benchmark
Peer-position benchmark shows employee scale above 70% of 10 comparable related peers.
Peer comparison matrix
Limited peer comparison
Compares this company with related-company evidence across employee scale and peer graph evidence.
Workforce locations
2
Locations represented in visible profile signals.
Workforce distribution
Concentrated workforce
Most visible profile location signals are in London, Ontario, Canada.
Workforce location footprint
Two-city workforce footprint
Visible profile locations span 2 cities across 1 country, led by London.
Workforce distribution model
HQ-centered workforce model
The largest visible workforce hub matches the company location and represents 83% of visible location signals.
Workforce geography evidence confidence
Multi-location workforce geography evidence
Workforce geography spans 2 locations across 6 visible profile signals, with reachable evidence across 1 location and company-domain evidence across 1 location. Top workforce hub matches company location.
Contactable workforce locations
1
Workforce locations represented by visible contact samples.
Top contactable workforce location
London, Ontario, Canada
Visible contact samples are concentrated in London, Ontario, Canada.
Workforce seniority tiers
2
Seniority bands derived from visible profile titles and levels.
Seniority evidence confidence
High-confidence seniority evidence
Seniority graph spans 6 classified profile signals across 2 tiers, with reachable evidence for 3 and company-domain evidence for 2. Contributor-heavy visible sample.
Classified seniority profiles
6
Visible profiles with usable seniority signals.
Official-domain seniority profiles
Multi-profile official-domain seniority evidence
2 seniority-classified profiles across 2 tiers include company-domain email signals.
Management-to-IC proxy
Contributor-heavy visible sample
2 managerial seniority signals and 4 contributor signals appear in the visible seniority-classified sample.
Role title diversity
Diverse role title sample
6 distinct role titles across 6 visible titled profiles.
Visible role titles
6
Distinct role titles found in visible profile signals.
Contactable role titles
3
Distinct role titles with visible contact samples.
Contactable role coverage
Diverse contactable role coverage
3 reachable role titles across 3 contactable titled profiles.
Decision-maker signals
2
Visible profiles matching seniority or leadership title patterns.
Decision-maker reachability
Partial decision-maker reachability
Some mapped decision-maker signals include visible contact data.
Buying committee evidence confidence
Mapped buying committee
Mapped decision-maker signals span 1 business function.
Buyer persona availability
Single-persona buyer availability
Mapped decision-maker evidence covers Technology buyer; 0 of 1 buyer persona include visible contact data.
Decision-maker contactability rate
50
Percent of mapped decision-maker signals with visible contact data.
Official-domain decision-maker coverage
Strong official-domain decision-maker coverage
Most contactable decision-maker signals use agm.on.ca email coverage.
Official-domain decision-maker contacts
1
Contactable decision-maker signals with official-domain email coverage.
Best covered outreach path
General + Manager
Coverage combines 1 visible General contact signal, 1 contactable Manager decision-maker signal, and 1 official-domain decision-maker email signal.
Prospecting fit
Strong prospecting fit
Archibald, Gray & McKay Ltd. shows strong prospecting fit based on person-level contact coverage, best covered outreach path, decision-maker coverage, and technology workforce evidence.
ICP fit
Strong ICP fit
Archibald, Gray & McKay Ltd. matches the strong ICP fit band for common outbound filters based on company size, market specificity, contactability, buying committee, and technology path.
Account research checklist
Multi-step account research checklist
Account research checklist combines best covered outreach path, buying-committee coverage, ICP fit, technology workforce evidence, related-company graph, and domain trust; raw contact values are hidden.
Intelligence signal groups
22
AeroLeads signal groups available for this company.

Market focus signals

Primary industry
Civil Engineering
Market specificity
Tagged market profile
2 category and specialty signals in the company record.
Market evidence tier
High-confidence market evidence
Market evidence combines 7 classification signals from categories, specialties, related peer industries, and description keywords. 1 description-backed keyword signal is included.
Industry benchmark
Peer-informed industry benchmark
Industry benchmark uses 10 related companies, 3 benchmark dimensions, and 3 peer evidence types from the AeroLeads related-company graph.
Top peer industry
Construction
33% of 10 related peer industry signals.
Peer benchmark evidence
Multi-signal peer benchmark evidence
Peer benchmark combines 10 related companies with peer graph strength, size benchmark, and size position. Underlying peer graph includes 3 evidence types: employee benchmarks, website records, social profiles.
Size position
Larger than most related peers
7 of 10 related employee-estimated peers are lower.
Peer graph strength
Partial peer evidence graph
Related peer graph has employee benchmarks, website records, and social profiles across 10 related companies.
Benchmark dimensions: peer graph strength, size benchmark, and size position.
Categories
Civil Engineering
Specialties
Facilities Services
Product-market keyword evidence
Limited market keywords
Keyword evidence comes from 3 source field groups: Category, Specialty, Description.
Product-market keyword evidence tier: Limited product-market keyword evidence. Product-market keyword evidence combines 3 unique market keywords, 3 source field groups, and 1 description-backed keyword (1 category, 1 specialty, and 1 description).
Civil Engineering · Category Facilities Services · Specialty ontario land surveyors · Description
Related peer industries
Peer-industry evidence tier: High-confidence peer-industry evidence. Peer-industry evidence combines 9 related companies, 5 peer-industry clusters, and top peer industry Construction at 33.3%.
Construction 3 peers
33.3% of related peer industries
Utilities 1 peer
11.1% of related peer industries
Entertainment Providers 1 peer
11.1% of related peer industries
Facilities Services 1 peer
11.1% of related peer industries
Real Estate 1 peer
11.1% of related peer industries

Company signals

Company signal breadth
Two-signal company record
Company-level signals include social audience and ownership.
Corroborated company record evidence: Company record evidence combines 2 source-backed company signal types: social audience and ownership.
Social audience
307
Followers in the company source record.
Social audience evidence tier: Limited social-audience evidence. Social audience evidence uses 307 followers from source field social_followers.
Audience density
Low audience density
307 followers against 20 employee estimate, about 15.30 followers per estimated employee.
Audience-density evidence tier: Limited audience-density evidence. Audience-density evidence combines 307 social followers, 20 employee estimate, and 15.30 followers per estimated employee.
Company ownership
Private company record
Company source record includes source type Privately Held.
Company ownership evidence tier: Structured ownership evidence. Ownership evidence combines source type Privately Held from structured company source fields.

Workforce composition

Department leadership coverage
Focused department leadership coverage
Leadership signals appear in 1 of 1 mapped departments. Leadership signals represent 33.3% of mapped department signals.
Department leadership evidence tier: Limited department leadership evidence. Department leadership evidence combines 2 leadership signals, 1 of 1 mapped departments, and 33.3% leadership density.
2 leadership signals 1 departments with visible contacts
General 6 signals
100.0% of mapped department signals, 2 leadership signals, 1 visible contact

Technology talent signals

2 matched technology role signals.

Technology evidence tier
Mapped technology evidence
2 matched technology role signals found in the workforce graph.
Engineering 2 profiles
100.0% of matched technology role signals
Matched role examples
Engineering Design Manager at Agm 1
Surveying Technician with Gis Expertise - Bachelor's in Civil Engineering - Precision 1

Workforce seniority mix

Aggregated from 6 classified profile signals.

Largest seniority band
Individual contributor
4 of 6 classified profile signals, 2 with visible contact data, 1 official-domain.
Multi-profile official-domain seniority evidence: 2 seniority-classified profiles across 2 tiers include company-domain email signals.
High-confidence seniority evidence: Seniority graph spans 6 classified profile signals across 2 tiers, with reachable evidence for 3 and company-domain evidence for 2. Contributor-heavy visible sample.
Management-to-IC proxy
Contributor-heavy visible sample
33.3%
managerial seniority signals
66.7%
contributor seniority signals
2 managerial seniority signals and 4 contributor signals appear in the visible seniority-classified sample.
Management-shape evidence tier: Contributor-heavy management-shape evidence. Management-shape evidence combines 6 seniority-classified signals, 2 managerial signals, 33.3% managerial share, and 4 contributor signals.
Individual contributor 4 profiles
66.7% of classified seniority signals, 2 with visible contact data, 1 official-domain
Manager 2 profiles
33.3% of classified seniority signals, 1 with visible contact data, 1 official-domain

Workforce geography

Aggregated from 6 visible profile location signals.

Workforce geography evidence
Multi-location workforce geography evidence
Workforce geography spans 2 locations across 6 visible profile signals, with reachable evidence across 1 location and company-domain evidence across 1 location. Top workforce hub matches company location.
Distribution signal
Concentrated workforce
Most visible profile location signals are in London, Ontario, Canada.
Workforce distribution model
HQ-centered workforce model
The largest visible workforce hub matches the company location and represents 83% of visible location signals.
Corroborated workforce model evidence: Workforce model evidence combines 6 located profile signals, 2 workforce locations, 2 cities, 1 country, top hub London, Ontario, Canada at 83%, company-location alignment, 1 reachable location, and 1 company-domain location.
Locations
2
Countries
1
Top hub share
83%
Workforce location footprint
Two-city workforce footprint
Visible profile locations span 2 cities across 1 country, led by London.
Cities
2
Countries
1
Company-location alignment
Top workforce hub matches company location
The largest visible workforce location is London, Ontario, Canada, matching the company location London, Ontario, Ca.
Top workforce hub share: 83.3%
Company-location evidence tier: High-confidence company-location alignment evidence. Company-location alignment evidence combines company location London, Ontario, Ca, top workforce hub London, Ontario, Canada, 83.3% top workforce hub share, and locality match.
Contactable location spread
Concentrated contact coverage
Visible contact samples are concentrated in London, Ontario, Canada.
Contactable location evidence tier: Concentrated contactable location evidence. Contactable location evidence combines 3 contactable profile location signals, 1 workforce location, top contactable hub London, Ontario, Canada at 100.0%, and company-location alignment.
Contactable workforce hub matches company location: The largest contactable workforce location is London, Ontario, Canada, matching the company location London, Ontario, Ca. Top contactable hub share: 100.0%.
London, Ontario, Canada 3 contacts
100.0% of contactable location signals
Official-domain location spread
Concentrated official-domain workforce
Company-domain email profile locations are concentrated in London, Ontario, Canada.
2 profiles with agm.on.ca email evidence include location signals.
Official-domain location evidence tier: Concentrated official-domain location evidence. Official-domain location evidence combines 2 official-domain profile location signals, 1 workforce location, top official-domain hub London, Ontario, Canada at 100.0%, and company-location alignment.
Official-domain workforce hub matches company location: The largest company-domain email workforce location is London, Ontario, Canada, matching the company location London, Ontario, Ca. Top official-domain hub share: 100.0%.
London, Ontario, Canada 2 profiles
100.0% of official-domain location signals
London, Ontario, Canada 5 profiles
83.3% of visible location signals
Canada 1 profile
16.7% of visible location signals

Decision-maker coverage

2 seniority signals, 1 with visible contact data.

Decision-maker evidence tier
Mapped decision-maker evidence
Decision-maker evidence covers 2 seniority signals, 1 reachable, and 1 company-domain. Buying committee spans 1 function.
Account planning snapshot
Multi-signal account planning snapshot
Snapshot combines department reachability, decision-maker coverage, and buying-committee function aggregates.
3 account-planning evidence cards available.
Account planning evidence tier: Corroborated account planning evidence. Account planning evidence combines 3 aggregate account-planning cards, best covered outreach path, 1 official-domain decision-maker signal, Manager seniority reachability, and General department contactability; raw contacts are hidden.
Best covered path
General + Manager
Coverage combines 1 visible General contact signal, 1 contactable Manager decision-maker signal, and 1 official-domain decision-maker email signal.
Most reachable seniority
Manager
1 of 2 signals in this seniority band include visible contact data.
Top reachable team
General
1 visible contact signal in this department sample.
Partial decision-maker reachability 50.0%
Some mapped decision-maker signals include visible contact data.
Decision-maker reachability evidence tier: Partial decision-maker reachability evidence. Decision-maker reachability evidence combines 1 contactable decision-maker signal, 2 mapped decision-maker signals, 50.0% contactability, and 1 official-domain decision-maker signal.
Email-led decision-maker coverage: Mapped decision-maker contact data is strongest for email, with 1 email signals.
Buying committee function coverage
Single-function buying-committee coverage
0 of 1 mapped functions include visible decision-maker contact data.
Mapped buying committee: Mapped decision-maker signals span 1 business function.
Buying committee evidence tier: Mapped buying-committee evidence. Buying-committee evidence combines 1 mapped buying-committee function and Technology / data function coverage.
Buyer persona availability: Single-persona buyer availability. Mapped decision-maker evidence covers Technology buyer; 0 of 1 buyer persona include visible contact data. Mapped buyer persona evidence: Buyer persona evidence combines 1 mapped buyer persona and Technology buyer coverage.
Technology / data
Most reachable seniority
Manager
1 of 2 seniority signals include visible contact data.
Seniority reachability evidence tier: Mapped seniority reachability evidence. Seniority reachability evidence combines 1 contactable Manager signal, 2 Manager signals, 50.0% tier contactability, 1 official-domain Manager signal, and email coverage.
Official-domain decision-maker coverage
Strong official-domain decision-maker coverage
1 contactable decision-maker signals match agm.on.ca. Most contactable decision-maker signals use agm.on.ca email coverage.
Official-domain decision-maker evidence tier: Strong official-domain decision-maker evidence. Official-domain decision-maker evidence combines 1 official-domain decision-maker signal, 1 contactable decision-maker signal, 100.0% official-domain coverage, and agm.on.ca domain match.
Manager 2 profiles
100.0% of mapped seniority signals, 1 with visible contact data

Role and function mix

6 visible titled profiles across 6 distinct role titles.

Title mix
Diverse role title sample
6 distinct role titles across 6 visible titled profiles.
Role-title evidence tier: Diverse role-title evidence. Role-title diversity evidence combines 6 visible titled profiles, 6 distinct role titles, and top title Accountant at Agm Plan, Survey at 16.7%.
Contactable role coverage
Diverse contactable role coverage
3 reachable role titles across 3 contactable titled profiles.
Contactable role evidence tier: Diverse contactable role evidence. Contactable role evidence combines 3 contactable titled profiles, 3 reachable role titles, and top reachable role Accountant at Agm Plan, Survey at 33.3%.
Role title reachability
Broad role-title reachability
3 of 6 distinct visible role titles include email or phone signals.
Role-title reachability evidence tier: Corroborated role-title reachability evidence. Role-title reachability evidence combines 6 visible role titles, 3 reachable titles, 50.0% title reachability, and 2 official-domain titles.
Multi-title official-domain reachability 2 / 6 titles
2 of 6 distinct visible role titles include email signals matching agm.on.ca.
Accountant at Agm Plan, Survey 1 profile
16.7% of visible titled profiles
Engineering Design Manager at Agm 1 profile
16.7% of visible titled profiles
Graduate from Fanshawe College 1 profile
16.7% of visible titled profiles
Ontario Land Surveyor at Archibald 1 profile
16.7% of visible titled profiles
Project Manager at Agm Surveying 1 profile
16.7% of visible titled profiles
Surveying Technician with Gis Expertise - Bachelor's in Civil Engineering - Precision 1 profile
16.7% of visible titled profiles

Contactability signals

Contactability score 75.0%
3 of 4 visible profiles include email or phone signals.
Contact channel mix
Email-led contact coverage
Visible profile or company source data is strongest for email outreach.
Contact evidence tier
High-confidence contact evidence
2 current or verified professional email signals, 3 company-domain email signals, and email-led contact coverage; raw addresses and numbers are hidden.
Contact data safety
Corroborated privacy-safe contact intelligence
AeroLeads exposes contact counts, channel mix, freshness, and domain-alignment evidence while hiding raw email addresses and masking phone numbers in public output.
Aggregate signals
6
Channel coverage
Email aggregate coverage
Evidence groups
5
Corroborated contact-safety evidence: Contact-safety evidence combines visible profile contact sample, company email sample, current email metadata, dated contact metadata, and official-domain email evidence; public schema uses aggregate variables only.
Aggregate-only contact schema: Dataset variables use counts, rates, channel labels, freshness bands, and domain-alignment metrics instead of raw contact values.
Best covered outreach path
General + Manager
Coverage combines 1 visible General contact signal, 1 contactable Manager decision-maker signal, and 1 official-domain decision-maker email signal.
Outreach path evidence tier: Corroborated outreach path evidence. Outreach path evidence combines 1 visible General contact signal, 1 contactable Manager decision-maker signal, and 1 official-domain decision-maker email signal; raw contacts are hidden.
Email usability mix
Current email coverage sample
AeroLeads source data includes 7 unique visible email signals; 2 are marked current or verified and 2 are professional-type. Raw addresses are hidden.
Email usability evidence tier: Corroborated email usability evidence. Email usability evidence combines 7 unique email signals, 2 current or verified, 2 professional-type, and 28.6% current signal rate; raw addresses are hidden.
2 current or verified 2 professional-type 28.6% current signal rate
Contact freshness
Dated contact metadata
AeroLeads source data includes 3 dated contact records; 0 fall within 90 days and 0 fall within 12 months of the Jun 2026 source update. Raw emails and phone numbers are hidden.
Contact freshness evidence tier: Dated contact freshness evidence. Contact freshness evidence combines 3 dated contact records, email timestamps, and 3 official-domain dated email records.
3 dated records 0 within 90 days 0.0% fresh rate 0 within 12 months Latest Oct 2021
Dated email metadata: Dated contact records include 3 email records.
Dated official-domain contact metadata: 3 dated official-domain email records; 0 fall within 12 months of the Jun 2026 source update.
Visible people
4
With contact data
3
Email coverage
3
75.0% of visible profiles
Company email sample
Limited company email sample
AeroLeads source data includes 3 email records across 1 domain; raw addresses are hidden. 3 match agm.on.ca.
Source email evidence tier: Corroborated source email evidence. Source email evidence combines 3 unique source email records, 1 domain, 3 matching agm.on.ca, and 100.0% official-domain rate.

Email domain intelligence

2 of 7 visible email signals match agm.on.ca.

Mixed-domain coverage: Visible email signals include official-domain and non-official domains.
Email identity evidence tier: Corroborated email identity evidence. Email identity evidence combines 7 visible email signals, 2 matching agm.on.ca, 2 people with official-domain email, 28.6% official-domain match, 3 other-domain signals, and 2 personal-domain signals.
28.6% domain match 2 people with official-domain email 5 non-official email signals

Department contact samples

Focused department contact spread: Visible contact samples appear in 1 of 1 mapped departments.
Department contactability evidence tier: Limited department contactability evidence. Department contactability evidence combines 1 visible contact sample, 1 of 1 mapped department, and 1 email signal; raw contacts are hidden.
Department Contacts Email Official email Phone
General 1 1 0 0
Top email pattern: flast at 60.0% of matched patterns.
Format example: [first_initial][last]@agm.on.ca
Strong pattern: One email pattern leads, with secondary variants present.
Email pattern evidence tier: Corroborated email pattern evidence. Email pattern evidence combines 2 matched patterns, 60.0% top-pattern share, format example for agm.on.ca, and secondary pattern variants.
flast 60.0%
first 40.0%

Explore related pages

Archibald, Gray & McKay Ltd. email format Archibald, Gray & McKay Ltd. management graph and contactability signals

Related company intelligence:

3 of 4 visible Archibald, Gray & McKay Ltd. profiles include email or phone signals. Review people graph
The strongest Archibald, Gray & McKay Ltd. email pattern signal is [first_initial][last] , representing 60.0% of matched email-pattern evidence in the AeroLeads company graph.
Other observed email-pattern signals for Archibald, Gray & McKay Ltd. are [first] .
In total, AeroLeads has detected 2 aggregate email-pattern signals for Archibald, Gray & McKay Ltd.. View the detailed email format page .

Archibald, Gray & McKay Ltd. Email Pattern Intelligence Snapshot

These aggregate patterns support the company intelligence page. The dedicated email-format workflow lives on Archibald, Gray & McKay Ltd. email format .

Observed pattern
Example pattern
[first_initial][last]
[first_initial][last]@agm.on.ca
60%
[first]
[first]@agm.on.ca
40%

Archibald, Gray & McKay Ltd. Questions

Archibald, Gray & McKay Ltd. people graph sample