Eyetoeye Design
Company intelligence Management

Eyetoeye Design Company Intelligence, Employees & Contact Signals

Contact coverage
Phone-led
Visible profile or company source data is strongest for phone outreach. 1 visible profile includes direct contact evidence.
People graph depth
2 signals
Deep profile graph across 2 mapped departments.
Account research
6 steps
Account research checklist combines person-level contact coverage, buying-committee coverage, ICP fit, technology workforce evidence, related-company graph, and domain trust; raw contact values are hidden.
Technology talent
2
Technology-oriented role signals in the workforce graph.
Evidence quality 100/100 Priority intelligence record

AeroLeads company intelligence

Eyetoeye Design workforce and contactability signals

Evidence from AeroLeads company records, matched professional profiles, and related company graph.

High confidence
Intelligence completeness
Strong intelligence record
7 of 11 major intelligence groups are available for this company.
Largest mapped team
Executive
1 profile signals in Executive.
Departments mapped
2
Workforce composition from AeroLeads profile data.
Profile graph
Deep profile graph
2 mapped workforce signals against a 2 employee size estimate.
Top reachable team
General
1 visible contact signal.
Top seniority band
Executive
1 of 3 classified profile signals.
Visible contact sample
1
Displayed people with email or phone data.

Profile graph researchability

Visible people graph includes 3 visible people: 3 named, 3 titled, 2 located, and 1 contactable.

Profile research sample
Profile coverage evidence tier: Deep profile coverage evidence. Profile coverage evidence combines 2 mapped workforce signals, 2 employee size estimate, and 100.0% profile graph coverage.
Corroborated profile graph evidence: Researchability is based on 3 visible people with 4 populated evidence dimensions: named, titled, located, and contactable signals.
Profile association confidence: Profile association sample. Association confidence combines 3 titled profiles and 1 contactable profile.
People
3
Named
3
Titled
3
Located
2
Contactable
1

Data methodology

AeroLeads renders only source-backed fields for this company page.

4 source groups
Company record Matched profile graph Related company graph Company signal fields
Blank source fields are omitted
Related companies are ordered deterministically
Structured data uses aggregate counts only

Intelligence completeness

7 of 11 major intelligence groups are available for this company.

7 / 11 groups
Strong intelligence record 63.6%
Workforce composition Contactability Decision makers Buying committee Technology talent Domain confidence Market and peer context

Evidence quality

This page clears the 60+ AeroLeads company-intelligence evidence threshold.

100 / 100
Priority intelligence record Threshold 60+
Workforce composition Employee phone coverage Department contactability Department seniority map Decision-maker coverage Technology talent
Workforce graph
16 signals
Workforce composition, Department contactability, Department seniority map
Contactability
7 signals
Employee phone coverage, Official-domain contact freshness, Contact channel mix
Decision-maker intelligence
5 signals
Decision-maker coverage, Leadership signals, Department leadership coverage
Technology intelligence
3 signals
Technology talent, Technology leadership depth, Technology leadership
Market and peer context
14 signals
Related company graph, Peer graph strength, Peer position benchmark
Company momentum
3 signals
Company signal breadth, Company momentum score, Company ownership signal
Source trust
9 signals
Domain confidence, Intelligence completeness, Company description
51 additional source-backed evidence signals are counted in this page quality score.

Prospecting readiness

Eyetoeye Design shows actionable prospecting fit based on person-level contact coverage, decision-maker coverage, technology workforce evidence, and people graph depth.

65 / 100
Actionable prospecting fit High-confidence prospecting evidence

Prospecting evidence combines person-level contact coverage, decision-maker coverage, technology workforce evidence, people graph depth, and peer context; raw contact values are hidden.

ICP fit
Qualified ICP fit

ICP fit combines company size, market specificity, contactability, buying committee, and technology path; raw contact values are hidden.

78 / 100
Company size
2 employees
Employee estimate is available for ICP filtering.
Market specificity
Focused market profile
8 market classification signals across categories, specialties, and related peer industries.
Reachability
Mapped contact-channel evidence
Visible profile or company source data is strongest for phone outreach.
Buying committee
Mapped buying committee
Mapped decision-maker signals span 1 business function.
Technology path
Mapped technology evidence
2 matched technology role signals found in the workforce graph.
Account research checklist
Multi-step account research checklist

Account research checklist combines person-level contact coverage, buying-committee coverage, ICP fit, technology workforce evidence, related-company graph, and domain trust; raw contact values are hidden.

6 steps
Confirm contact coverage
Mapped contact-channel evidence
Visible profile or company source data is strongest for phone outreach.
Map reachable buying committee
Mapped buying committee
Buying-committee evidence combines 1 mapped buying-committee function and Product / design function coverage.
Validate ICP fit
Qualified ICP fit
ICP fit combines company size, market specificity, contactability, buying committee, and technology path; raw contact values are hidden.
Review technology path
Mapped technology evidence
2 matched technology role signals found in the workforce graph.
Compare related peers
Limited peer comparison
Compares this company with related-company evidence across employee scale and peer graph evidence.
Check domain trust
Basic domain identity
Domain evidence combines website domain, social profile, and company email sample; raw email addresses are hidden.
Contact coverage
Mapped contact-channel evidence
Visible profile or company source data is strongest for phone outreach.
Decision-maker coverage
Mapped buying committee
Mapped decision-maker signals span 1 business function.
Technology contact path
Mapped technology evidence
2 matched technology role signals found in the workforce graph.
People graph depth
Deep profile graph
2 mapped workforce signals against a 2 employee size estimate.

Domain trust signals

Domain confidence for eyetoeyedesign.ca is based on website domain, social profile, and company email sample.

45 / 100
Basic domain identity Corroborated domain evidence

Domain evidence combines website domain, social profile, and company email sample; raw email addresses are hidden.

Website domain
eyetoeyedesign.ca
The official website domain is available from the company source record.
Social profile
LinkedIn organization page
A LinkedIn organization page is present for this company record.
Company email sample
2 official-domain source email records
Company-level email source records include official-domain coverage; raw addresses are hidden.

AeroLeads coverage snapshot

Profile sample
2
Visible people attached to this company page.
Profile graph depth
Deep profile graph
2 mapped workforce signals against a 2 employee size estimate.
Contactable sample
1
Visible people with email or phone data.
Contact channel mix
Phone-led contact coverage
Visible profile or company source data is strongest for phone outreach.
Contact evidence confidence
Mapped contact-channel evidence
Visible profile or company source data is strongest for phone outreach.
Department coverage
2
Departments represented in AeroLeads workforce signals.
Department concentration
Multi-department workforce
Mapped workforce signals span 2 departments, led by General.
Leadership signals
1
Department lead or leadership signals in the org data.
Department leader sample
Limited department leader sample
AeroLeads source data includes 1 leadership signal across 1 department; rows show titles and contact-channel presence only.
Department leadership coverage
Focused department leadership coverage
Leadership signals appear in 1 of 2 mapped departments.
Leadership density
50
Percent of mapped department signals that are leadership signals.
Department contact coverage
1
Departments with visible contact samples.
Department contact spread
Focused department contact spread
Visible contact samples appear in 1 of 2 mapped departments.
Department seniority map
Two-department seniority map
Visible department samples map 2 seniority-classified profiles across 2 departments and 2 seniority bands.
Technology talent
2
Visible profiles matching technology role patterns.
Technology evidence confidence
Mapped technology evidence
2 matched technology role signals found in the workforce graph.
Domain confidence
Basic domain identity
Domain confidence for eyetoeyedesign.ca is based on website domain, social profile, and company email sample.
Contact freshness
Dated contact metadata
AeroLeads source data includes 2 dated contact records; 0 fall within 90 days and 0 fall within 12 months of the Jun 2026 source update. Raw emails and phone numbers are hidden.
Contact data safety
Corroborated privacy-safe contact intelligence
AeroLeads exposes contact counts, channel mix, freshness, and domain-alignment evidence while hiding raw email addresses and masking phone numbers in public output.
Official-domain contact freshness
Dated official-domain contact metadata
2 dated official-domain email records; 0 fall within 12 months of the Jun 2026 source update.
Company signal breadth
Multi-signal company record
Company-level signals include social audience, company maturity, and ownership.
Company momentum score
Limited company momentum score
Momentum score blends contactability and peer position from AeroLeads company and profile evidence.
Company ownership signal
Company type signal
Company source record includes source type Self-Owned.
Audience density
Low audience density
24 followers against 2 employee estimate, about 12 followers per estimated employee.
Specialty signals
4
Specialty tags in the company record.
Market specificity
Focused market profile
8 market classification signals across categories, specialties, and related peer industries.
Peer industry clusters
3
Industries represented by related company records.
Related companies
10
Company graph links available for comparison.
Industry benchmark
Evidence-backed industry benchmark
Industry benchmark uses 10 related companies, 8 same-industry peers, 3 benchmark dimensions, and 4 peer evidence types from the AeroLeads related-company graph.
Peer benchmark confidence
Multi-signal peer benchmark evidence
Peer benchmark combines 10 related companies with peer graph strength, size benchmark, and size position. Underlying peer graph includes 4 evidence types: industry context, employee benchmarks, website records, social profiles.
Peer position benchmark
Employee-scale peer position benchmark
Peer-position benchmark shows employee scale above 66.7% of 3 comparable related peers.
Peer comparison matrix
Limited peer comparison
Compares this company with related-company evidence across employee scale and peer graph evidence.
Workforce locations
2
Locations represented in visible profile signals.
Workforce distribution
Multi-location workforce
Visible profile location signals span 2 locations, led by Ontario, Canada.
Workforce location footprint
Multi-country workforce footprint
Visible profile locations span 2 cities across 2 countries, led by Ontario.
Workforce geography evidence confidence
Multi-location workforce geography evidence
Workforce geography spans 2 locations across 2 visible profile signals. Top workforce hub differs from company location.
Workforce seniority tiers
3
Seniority bands derived from visible profile titles and levels.
Seniority evidence confidence
Corroborated seniority evidence
Seniority graph spans 3 classified profile signals across 3 tiers, with reachable evidence for 1. Leadership-heavy visible sample.
Classified seniority profiles
3
Visible profiles with usable seniority signals.
Management-to-IC proxy
Leadership-heavy visible sample
2 managerial seniority signals and 1 contributor signal appear in the visible seniority-classified sample.
Role title diversity
Diverse role title sample
3 distinct role titles across 3 visible titled profiles.
Visible role titles
3
Distinct role titles found in visible profile signals.
Decision-maker signals
2
Visible profiles matching seniority or leadership title patterns.
Decision-maker reachability
No visible decision-maker contact coverage
Mapped decision-maker signals do not include visible contact data.
Buying committee evidence confidence
Mapped buying committee
Mapped decision-maker signals span 1 business function.
Buyer persona availability
Single-persona buyer availability
Mapped decision-maker evidence covers Product buyer; 0 of 1 buyer persona include visible contact data.
Prospecting fit
Actionable prospecting fit
Eyetoeye Design shows actionable prospecting fit based on person-level contact coverage, decision-maker coverage, technology workforce evidence, and people graph depth.
ICP fit
Qualified ICP fit
Eyetoeye Design matches the qualified ICP fit band for common outbound filters based on company size, market specificity, contactability, buying committee, and technology path.
Account research checklist
Multi-step account research checklist
Account research checklist combines person-level contact coverage, buying-committee coverage, ICP fit, technology workforce evidence, related-company graph, and domain trust; raw contact values are hidden.
Intelligence signal groups
17
AeroLeads signal groups available for this company.

Market focus signals

Primary industry
Graphic Design
Market specificity
Focused market profile
8 market classification signals across categories, specialties, and related peer industries.
Market evidence tier
High-confidence market evidence
Market evidence combines 8 classification signals from categories, specialties, related peer industries, and description keywords. 6 description-backed keyword signals are included.
Industry benchmark
Evidence-backed industry benchmark
Industry benchmark uses 10 related companies, 8 same-industry peers, 3 benchmark dimensions, and 4 peer evidence types from the AeroLeads related-company graph.
Top peer industry
Graphic Design
80% of 10 related peer industry signals.
Peer benchmark evidence
Multi-signal peer benchmark evidence
Peer benchmark combines 10 related companies with peer graph strength, size benchmark, and size position. Underlying peer graph includes 4 evidence types: industry context, employee benchmarks, website records, social profiles.
Size position
Larger than most related peers
2 of 3 related employee-estimated peers are lower.
Peer graph strength
Benchmark-ready peer graph
Related peer graph has industry context, employee benchmarks, website records, and social profiles across 10 related companies.
Benchmark dimensions: peer graph strength, size benchmark, and size position.
Categories
Graphic Design
Specialties
Website Design Brand Development Custom Photography Print Design
Product-market keyword evidence
Description-backed market keywords
Keyword evidence comes from 3 source field groups: Category, Specialty, Description.
Product-market keyword evidence tier: High-confidence product-market keyword evidence. Product-market keyword evidence combines 11 unique market keywords, 3 source field groups, and 6 description-backed keywords (1 category, 4 specialty, and 6 description).
Graphic Design · Category Website Design · Specialty Brand Development · Specialty Custom Photography · Specialty Print Design · Specialty glitzy but not · Description believes effectiveness · Description reason why · Description you desire · Description will join · Description your marketing materials · Description
Related peer industries
Peer-industry evidence tier: High-confidence peer-industry evidence. Peer-industry evidence combines 10 related companies, 3 peer-industry clusters, and top peer industry Graphic Design at 80.0%.
Graphic Design 8 peers
80.0% of related peer industries
Media Production 1 peer
10.0% of related peer industries
Software Development 1 peer
10.0% of related peer industries

Company signals

Company signal breadth
Multi-signal company record
Company-level signals include social audience, company maturity, and ownership.
Corroborated company record evidence: Company record evidence combines 3 source-backed company signal types: social audience, company maturity, and ownership.
Social audience
24
Followers in the company source record.
Social audience evidence tier: Limited social-audience evidence. Social audience evidence uses 24 followers from source field social_followers.
Audience density
Low audience density
24 followers against 2 employee estimate, about 12 followers per estimated employee.
Audience-density evidence tier: Limited audience-density evidence. Audience-density evidence combines 24 social followers, 2 employee estimate, and 12 followers per estimated employee.
Company maturity
Mature company record
Company source record includes founding year 1993, about 33 years before 2026.
Company maturity evidence tier: Long-running maturity evidence. Maturity evidence combines founding year 1993, 33 years of company history, and source field founded.
Company ownership
Company type signal
Company source record includes source type Self-Owned.
Company ownership evidence tier: Structured ownership evidence. Ownership evidence combines source type Self-Owned from structured company source fields.

Workforce composition

Department concentration
Multi-department workforce
Mapped workforce signals span 2 departments, led by General. 50.0% of mapped department signals are in the largest department.
Department concentration evidence tier: Multi-department concentration evidence. Department concentration evidence combines 2 mapped departments, top department General, and 50.0% top-department share.
Department leadership coverage
Focused department leadership coverage
Leadership signals appear in 1 of 2 mapped departments. Leadership signals represent 50.0% of mapped department signals.
Department leadership evidence tier: Limited department leadership evidence. Department leadership evidence combines 1 leadership signal, 1 of 2 mapped departments, and 50.0% leadership density.
Department seniority map
Two-department seniority map
Visible department samples map 2 seniority-classified profiles across 2 departments and 2 seniority bands.
Department seniority evidence tier: Corroborated department seniority evidence. Department seniority evidence combines 2 seniority-classified profiles, 2 departments, 2 seniority bands, and top cell Executive + Director with 1 profile.
Executive 1 profile
Director: 1
General 1 profile
Individual contributor: 1
1 leadership signals 1 departments with visible contacts
Department leader sample
Limited department leader sample
0 contactable

AeroLeads source data includes 1 leadership signal across 1 department; rows show titles and contact-channel presence only.

Department leader evidence tier: Limited department leader evidence. Department leader evidence combines 1 leadership signal and 1 department; raw contacts are hidden.
Leader Department Seniority Channel
liz crowe
Managing Director at Eyetoeye Design
 Executive Director No visible contact channel
General 1 signals
50.0% of mapped department signals, 1 visible contact
Executive 1 signals
50.0% of mapped department signals, 1 leadership signals

Technology talent signals

2 matched technology role signals.

Technology evidence tier
Mapped technology evidence
2 matched technology role signals found in the workforce graph.
High technology leadership depth 100.0%
2 of 2 matched technology role signals indicate leadership seniority.
Technology leadership depth evidence tier: High technology leadership depth evidence. Technology leadership depth evidence combines 2 technology leadership signals, 2 matched technology signals, and 100.0% leadership depth.
Product / design 2 profiles
100.0% of matched technology role signals
Matched role examples
Managing Director at Eyetoeye Design 1
Owner, Eyetoeye Design 1

Workforce seniority mix

Aggregated from 3 classified profile signals.

Largest seniority band
Executive
1 of 3 classified profile signals.
Corroborated seniority evidence: Seniority graph spans 3 classified profile signals across 3 tiers, with reachable evidence for 1. Leadership-heavy visible sample.
Management-to-IC proxy
Leadership-heavy visible sample
66.7%
managerial seniority signals
33.3%
contributor seniority signals
2 managerial seniority signals and 1 contributor signal appear in the visible seniority-classified sample.
Management-shape evidence tier: Leadership-heavy management-shape evidence. Management-shape evidence combines 3 seniority-classified signals, 2 managerial signals, 66.7% managerial share, and 1 contributor signal.
Executive 1 profile
33.3% of classified seniority signals
Director 1 profile
33.3% of classified seniority signals
Individual contributor 1 profile
33.3% of classified seniority signals, 1 with visible contact data

Workforce geography

Aggregated from 2 visible profile location signals.

Workforce geography evidence
Multi-location workforce geography evidence
Workforce geography spans 2 locations across 2 visible profile signals. Top workforce hub differs from company location.
Distribution signal
Multi-location workforce
Visible profile location signals span 2 locations, led by Ontario, Canada.
Workforce location footprint
Multi-country workforce footprint
Visible profile locations span 2 cities across 2 countries, led by Ontario.
Cities
2
Countries
2
Company-location alignment
Top workforce hub differs from company location
The largest visible workforce location is Ontario, Canada, while the company location is Whitby, Ontario, Ca.
Top workforce hub share: 50.0%
Company-location evidence tier: Workforce-location divergence evidence. Company-location alignment evidence combines company location Whitby, Ontario, Ca, top workforce hub Ontario, Canada, 50.0% top workforce hub share, and location difference.
Ontario, Canada 1 profile
50.0% of visible location signals
Motherwell, Scotland, United Kingdom 1 profile
50.0% of visible location signals

Decision-maker coverage

2 seniority signals.

Decision-maker evidence tier
Mapped decision-maker evidence
Decision-maker evidence covers 2 seniority signals. Buying committee spans 1 function.
No visible decision-maker contact coverage
Mapped decision-maker signals do not include visible contact data.
Buying committee function coverage
Single-function buying-committee coverage
0 of 1 mapped functions include visible decision-maker contact data.
Mapped buying committee: Mapped decision-maker signals span 1 business function.
Buying committee evidence tier: Mapped buying-committee evidence. Buying-committee evidence combines 1 mapped buying-committee function and Product / design function coverage.
Buyer persona availability: Single-persona buyer availability. Mapped decision-maker evidence covers Product buyer; 0 of 1 buyer persona include visible contact data. Mapped buyer persona evidence: Buyer persona evidence combines 1 mapped buyer persona and Product buyer coverage.
Product / design
Executive 1 profile
50.0% of mapped seniority signals
Director 1 profile
50.0% of mapped seniority signals

Role and function mix

3 visible titled profiles across 3 distinct role titles.

Title mix
Diverse role title sample
3 distinct role titles across 3 visible titled profiles.
Role-title evidence tier: Diverse role-title evidence. Role-title diversity evidence combines 3 visible titled profiles, 3 distinct role titles, and top title Managing Director at Eyetoeye Design at 33.3%.
Managing Director at Eyetoeye Design 1 profile
33.3% of visible titled profiles
Owner, Eyetoeye Design 1 profile
33.3% of visible titled profiles
Videographer and Video Editor 1 profile
33.3% of visible titled profiles

Contactability signals

Contactability score 50.0%
1 of 2 visible profiles include email or phone signals.
Contact channel mix
Phone-led contact coverage
Visible profile or company source data is strongest for phone outreach.
Contact evidence tier
Mapped contact-channel evidence
Visible profile or company source data is strongest for phone outreach.
Contact data safety
Corroborated privacy-safe contact intelligence
AeroLeads exposes contact counts, channel mix, freshness, and domain-alignment evidence while hiding raw email addresses and masking phone numbers in public output.
Aggregate signals
3
Channel coverage
Email and phone aggregate coverage
Evidence groups
4
Corroborated contact-safety evidence: Contact-safety evidence combines visible profile contact sample, company email sample, dated contact metadata, and official-domain email evidence; public schema uses aggregate variables only.
Aggregate-only contact schema: Dataset variables use counts, rates, channel labels, freshness bands, and domain-alignment metrics instead of raw contact values.
Contact freshness
Dated contact metadata
AeroLeads source data includes 2 dated contact records; 0 fall within 90 days and 0 fall within 12 months of the Jun 2026 source update. Raw emails and phone numbers are hidden.
Contact freshness evidence tier: Dated contact freshness evidence. Contact freshness evidence combines 2 dated contact records, email timestamps, and 2 official-domain dated email records.
2 dated records 0 within 90 days 0.0% fresh rate 0 within 12 months Latest Oct 2021
Dated email metadata: Dated contact records include 2 email records.
Dated official-domain contact metadata: 2 dated official-domain email records; 0 fall within 12 months of the Jun 2026 source update.
Visible people
2
With contact data
1
Phone coverage
1
50.0% of visible profiles
Company email sample
Limited company email sample
AeroLeads source data includes 2 email records across 1 domain; raw addresses are hidden. 2 match eyetoeyedesign.ca.
Source email evidence tier: Corroborated source email evidence. Source email evidence combines 2 unique source email records, 1 domain, 2 matching eyetoeyedesign.ca, and 100.0% official-domain rate.

Department contact samples

Focused department contact spread: Visible contact samples appear in 1 of 2 mapped departments.
Department contactability evidence tier: Limited department contactability evidence. Department contactability evidence combines 1 visible contact sample, 1 of 2 mapped departments, and 1 phone signal; raw contacts are hidden.
Department Contacts Email Official email Phone
General 1 0 0 1

Explore related pages

Eyetoeye Design management graph and contactability signals

Related company intelligence:

It’s simple, if design is beautiful and glitzy, but not effective, what good is it? We are a design and communication company that believes effectiveness is the reason why we do what we do. We desire to partner with our customers to make their company succeed. If you desire a firm that will join with you to make your marketing materials hit the target, get in touch with us today!

Company source details

Employees
2
Founded
1993
Address
Whitby, Ontario, Ca
Industry
Graphic Design
NAICS
Graphic Design Services
Website
eyetoeyedesign.ca
Keywords
Website Design, Brand Development, Custom Photography, Print Design.
HQ
Whitby
Related companies
CINEMETRIX MEDIA, Monolab Design, Plinka Design, Aly Mohamed, ARTCLIP 2D & 3D Artistic Software, Burning Fire Design, Ehmulation, Splash Presentations, UOD Design Consultant, Urtica Design Inc.
Explore visible people signals for Eyetoeye Design by role, title, or keyword.

1 of 2 visible profiles include email or phone signals in AeroLeads.

Eyetoeye Design Questions

Eyetoeye Design people graph sample