JENSORTER
Company intelligence

JENSORTER Company Intelligence, Employees & Contact Signals

Contact coverage
Email-led
Visible profile or company source data includes email and phone channels. 2 visible profiles include direct contact evidence.
People graph depth
4 signals
4 mapped workforce signals against a 5 employee size estimate.
Account research
6 steps
Account research checklist combines person-level contact coverage, ICP fit, technology workforce evidence, related-company graph, domain trust, and people graph depth; raw contact values are hidden.
Technology talent
2
Technology-oriented role signals in the workforce graph.
Evidence quality 100/100 Priority intelligence record

AeroLeads company intelligence

JENSORTER workforce and contactability signals

Evidence from AeroLeads company records, matched professional profiles, and related company graph.

High confidence
Intelligence completeness
Partial intelligence record
6 of 11 major intelligence groups are available for this company.
Profile graph
Deep profile graph
4 mapped workforce signals against a 5 employee size estimate.
Top seniority band
Individual contributor
4 of 4 classified profile signals.
Visible contact sample
2
Displayed people with email or phone data.
Technology talent
2
Technology roles and departments found in workforce signals.
Social followers
24
Audience size from company social data.
Funding signal
Corporate round
Last round jul 1, 2018, 1 total round.

Profile graph researchability

Visible people graph includes 4 visible people: 4 named, 4 titled, 4 located, and 2 contactable.

Profile research sample
Profile coverage evidence tier: Deep profile coverage evidence. Profile coverage evidence combines 4 mapped workforce signals, 5 employee size estimate, and 80.0% profile graph coverage.
Corroborated profile graph evidence: Researchability is based on 4 visible people with 4 populated evidence dimensions: named, titled, located, and contactable signals.
Profile association confidence: Profile association sample. Association confidence combines 4 titled profiles and 2 contactable profiles.
People
4
Named
4
Titled
4
Located
4
Contactable
2

Data methodology

AeroLeads renders only source-backed fields for this company page.

5 source groups
Company record Matched profile graph Email-pattern aggregate Related company graph Company signal fields
Blank source fields are omitted
Related companies are ordered deterministically
Structured data uses aggregate counts only

Intelligence completeness

6 of 11 major intelligence groups are available for this company.

6 / 11 groups
Partial intelligence record 54.5%
Workforce composition Contactability Email intelligence Technology talent Domain confidence Market and peer context

Evidence quality

This page clears the 60+ AeroLeads company-intelligence evidence threshold.

100 / 100
Priority intelligence record Threshold 60+
Employee email coverage Role title reachability Technology talent Email usability mix Related company graph Peer graph strength
Contactability
10 signals
Employee email coverage, Email usability mix, Support email
Workforce graph
14 signals
Role title reachability, Profile graph researchability, Workforce location footprint
Technology intelligence
2 signals
Technology talent, Technology reachability
Market and peer context
13 signals
Related company graph, Peer graph strength, Peer position benchmark
Company momentum
5 signals
Company signal breadth, Company momentum score, Company ownership signal
Source trust
8 signals
Domain confidence, Intelligence completeness, Company description
Decision-maker intelligence
1 signal
Account research checklist
47 additional source-backed evidence signals are counted in this page quality score.

Prospecting readiness

JENSORTER shows research-first prospecting fit based on person-level contact coverage, technology workforce evidence, people graph depth, and peer context.

50 / 100
Research-first prospecting fit Corroborated prospecting evidence

Prospecting evidence combines person-level contact coverage, technology workforce evidence, people graph depth, and peer context; raw contact values are hidden.

ICP fit
Research ICP fit

ICP fit combines company size, market specificity, contactability, and technology path; raw contact values are hidden.

53 / 100
Company size
5 employees
Employee estimate is available for ICP filtering.
Market specificity
Tagged market profile
2 category and specialty signals in the company record.
Reachability
Current email evidence
1 current or verified email signal available; raw addresses are hidden.
Technology path
Partial technology reachability
Some matched technology role signals include visible contact data.
Account research checklist
Multi-step account research checklist

Account research checklist combines person-level contact coverage, ICP fit, technology workforce evidence, related-company graph, domain trust, and people graph depth; raw contact values are hidden.

6 steps
Confirm contact coverage
Current email evidence
1 current or verified email signal available; raw addresses are hidden.
Validate ICP fit
Research ICP fit
ICP fit combines company size, market specificity, contactability, and technology path; raw contact values are hidden.
Review technology path
Partial technology reachability
Some matched technology role signals include visible contact data.
Compare related peers
Limited peer comparison
Compares this company with related-company evidence across employee scale and peer graph evidence.
Check domain trust
Mixed domain alignment
Domain evidence combines website domain and social profile; raw email addresses are hidden.
Review people graph depth
Deep profile graph
4 mapped workforce signals against a 5 employee size estimate.
Contact coverage
Current email evidence
1 current or verified email signal available; raw addresses are hidden.
Technology contact path
Partial technology reachability
Some matched technology role signals include visible contact data.
People graph depth
Deep profile graph
4 mapped workforce signals against a 5 employee size estimate.
Peer context
Multi-signal peer benchmark evidence
Peer benchmark combines 10 related companies with peer graph strength, size benchmark, and size position. Underlying peer graph includes 3 evidence types: employee benchmarks, website records, social profiles.
Decision-maker evidence missing: No mapped decision-maker cluster is strong enough to summarize.

Domain trust signals

Domain confidence for jensorter.com is based on website domain and social profile.

35 / 100
Mixed domain alignment Limited domain evidence

Domain evidence combines website domain and social profile; raw email addresses are hidden.

Website domain
jensorter.com
The official website domain is available from the company source record.
Social profile
LinkedIn organization page
A LinkedIn organization page is present for this company record.
Employee email mismatch: Visible employee email signals do not match the official domain.
Support email domain differs: The support email channel uses a non-official domain.

AeroLeads coverage snapshot

Profile sample
4
Visible people attached to this company page.
Profile graph depth
Deep profile graph
4 mapped workforce signals against a 5 employee size estimate.
Contactable sample
2
Visible people with email or phone data.
Contact channel mix
Multi-channel contact coverage
Visible profile or company source data includes email and phone channels.
Contact evidence confidence
Current email evidence
1 current or verified email signal available; raw addresses are hidden.
Company support channels
Email and phone
Company record includes support email and phone contact channels.
Technology talent
2
Visible profiles matching technology role patterns.
Technology evidence confidence
Reachable technology evidence
1 matched technology role signal include visible contact data.
Technology reachability
Partial technology reachability
Some matched technology role signals include visible contact data.
Technology contactability rate
50
Percent of matched technology role signals with visible contact data.
Email domain confidence
Non-official email coverage
Visible email signals use non-official domains only.
Domain confidence
Mixed domain alignment
Domain confidence for jensorter.com is based on website domain and social profile.
Email usability mix
Professional email coverage sample
AeroLeads source data includes 3 unique visible email signals; 1 is marked current or verified and 2 are professional-type. Raw addresses are hidden.
Contact data safety
Corroborated privacy-safe contact intelligence
AeroLeads exposes contact counts, channel mix, freshness, and domain-alignment evidence while hiding raw email addresses and masking phone numbers in public output.
Company signal breadth
Multi-signal company record
Company-level signals include social audience, company maturity, ownership, and funding.
Company momentum score
Limited company momentum score
Momentum score blends historical funding signal, contactability, and peer position from AeroLeads company and profile evidence.
Company ownership signal
Private company record
Company source record includes source type Privately Held.
Audience density
Low audience density
24 followers against 5 employee estimate, about 4.80 followers per estimated employee.
Funding recency
Historical funding signal
Last funding round is 96 months before the Jun 2026 source update.
Specialty signals
1
Specialty tags in the company record.
Market specificity
Tagged market profile
2 category and specialty signals in the company record.
Peer industry clusters
7
Industries represented by related company records.
Related companies
10
Company graph links available for comparison.
Industry benchmark
Peer-informed industry benchmark
Industry benchmark uses 10 related companies, 3 benchmark dimensions, and 3 peer evidence types from the AeroLeads related-company graph.
Peer benchmark confidence
Multi-signal peer benchmark evidence
Peer benchmark combines 10 related companies with peer graph strength, size benchmark, and size position. Underlying peer graph includes 3 evidence types: employee benchmarks, website records, social profiles.
Peer position benchmark
Employee-scale peer position benchmark
Peer-position benchmark shows employee scale above 10% of 10 comparable related peers.
Peer comparison matrix
Limited peer comparison
Compares this company with related-company evidence across employee scale and peer graph evidence.
Workforce locations
3
Locations represented in visible profile signals.
Workforce distribution
Multi-location workforce
Visible profile location signals span 3 locations, led by Portland, Oregon, United States.
Workforce location footprint
Two-city workforce footprint
Visible profile locations span 2 cities across 1 country, led by Portland.
Workforce distribution model
Multi-hub workforce model
Visible profile locations form multiple hubs across 3 locations, led by Portland, Oregon, United States at 50%.
Workforce geography evidence confidence
Corroborated workforce geography evidence
Workforce geography spans 3 locations across 4 visible profile signals, with reachable evidence across 2 locations. Top workforce hub shares company country.
Contactable workforce locations
2
Workforce locations represented by visible contact samples.
Top contactable workforce location
Hillsboro, Oregon, United States
Visible contact samples span 2 workforce locations, led by Hillsboro, Oregon, United States.
Workforce seniority tiers
1
Seniority bands derived from visible profile titles and levels.
Seniority evidence confidence
Limited seniority evidence
Seniority graph spans 4 classified profile signals across 1 tier, with reachable evidence for 2.
Classified seniority profiles
4
Visible profiles with usable seniority signals.
Role title diversity
Diverse role title sample
4 distinct role titles across 4 visible titled profiles.
Visible role titles
4
Distinct role titles found in visible profile signals.
Contactable role titles
2
Distinct role titles with visible contact samples.
Contactable role coverage
Mixed contactable role coverage
2 reachable role titles, led by Embedded Software Engineer at 50.0% of contactable titled profiles.
Prospecting fit
Research-first prospecting fit
JENSORTER shows research-first prospecting fit based on person-level contact coverage, technology workforce evidence, people graph depth, and peer context.
ICP fit
Research ICP fit
JENSORTER matches the research ICP fit band for common outbound filters based on company size, market specificity, contactability, and technology path.
Account research checklist
Multi-step account research checklist
Account research checklist combines person-level contact coverage, ICP fit, technology workforce evidence, related-company graph, domain trust, and people graph depth; raw contact values are hidden.
Intelligence signal groups
16
AeroLeads signal groups available for this company.

Market focus signals

Primary industry
Biotechnology Research
Market specificity
Tagged market profile
2 category and specialty signals in the company record.
Market evidence tier
High-confidence market evidence
Market evidence combines 7 classification signals from categories, specialties, related peer industries, and description keywords. 6 description-backed keyword signals are included.
Industry benchmark
Peer-informed industry benchmark
Industry benchmark uses 10 related companies, 3 benchmark dimensions, and 3 peer evidence types from the AeroLeads related-company graph.
Top peer industry
Semiconductor Manufacturing
20% of 10 related peer industry signals.
Peer benchmark evidence
Multi-signal peer benchmark evidence
Peer benchmark combines 10 related companies with peer graph strength, size benchmark, and size position. Underlying peer graph includes 3 evidence types: employee benchmarks, website records, social profiles.
Size position
Smaller than most related peers
9 of 10 related employee-estimated peers are higher.
Peer graph strength
Partial peer evidence graph
Related peer graph has employee benchmarks, website records, and social profiles across 10 related companies.
Benchmark dimensions: peer graph strength, size benchmark, and size position.
Categories
Biotechnology Research
Specialties
repairs all of the fish hatchery equipment it manufactures.
Product-market keyword evidence
Description-backed market keywords
Keyword evidence comes from 3 source field groups: Category, Specialty, Description.
Product-market keyword evidence tier: High-confidence product-market keyword evidence. Product-market keyword evidence combines 8 unique market keywords, 3 source field groups, and 6 description-backed keywords (1 category, 1 specialty, and 6 description).
Biotechnology Research · Category repairs all of the fish hatchery equipment it manufactures. · Specialty manufactures fish egg · Description counters including five · Description fish egg sorters · Description salmonid species · Description cool water species · Description equipment may · Description
Related peer industries
Peer-industry evidence tier: High-confidence peer-industry evidence. Peer-industry evidence combines 10 related companies, 5 peer-industry clusters, and top peer industry Semiconductor Manufacturing at 20.0%.
Semiconductor Manufacturing 2 peers
20.0% of related peer industries
Software Development 2 peers
20.0% of related peer industries
Technology, Information and Internet 2 peers
20.0% of related peer industries
Defense and Space Manufacturing 1 peer
10.0% of related peer industries
IT Services and IT Consulting 1 peer
10.0% of related peer industries

Company signals

Company signal breadth
Multi-signal company record
Company-level signals include social audience, company maturity, ownership, and funding.
Multi-signal company record evidence: Company record evidence combines 4 source-backed company signal types: social audience, company maturity, ownership, and funding.
Social audience
24
Followers in the company source record.
Social audience evidence tier: Limited social-audience evidence. Social audience evidence uses 24 followers from source field social_followers.
Audience density
Low audience density
24 followers against 5 employee estimate, about 4.80 followers per estimated employee.
Audience-density evidence tier: Limited audience-density evidence. Audience-density evidence combines 24 social followers, 5 employee estimate, and 4.80 followers per estimated employee.
Company maturity
Mature company record
Company source record includes founding year 1980, about 46 years before 2026.
Company maturity evidence tier: Long-running maturity evidence. Maturity evidence combines founding year 1980, 46 years of company history, and source field founded.
Company ownership
Private company record
Company source record includes source type Privately Held.
Company ownership evidence tier: Structured ownership evidence. Ownership evidence combines source type Privately Held from structured company source fields.
Funding
Corporate round
Jul 1, 2018 · 1 total rounds
Funding evidence tier: High-confidence funding evidence. Funding evidence combines round type Corporate round, last round date Jul 1, 2018, 1 total round, and historical funding signal from structured company source fields.
Historical funding signal: Last funding round is 96 months before the Jun 2026 source update.

Technology talent signals

2 matched technology role signals, 1 with visible contact data.

Technology evidence tier
Reachable technology evidence
1 matched technology role signal include visible contact data.
Partial technology reachability 50.0%
Some matched technology role signals include visible contact data.
Technology reachability evidence tier: Partial technology reachability evidence. Technology reachability evidence combines 1 contactable technology signal, 2 matched technology signals, and 50.0% role contactability.
Engineering 2 profiles
100.0% of matched technology role signals
Matched role examples
Embedded Software Engineer 1
Mechanical Engineering Student at Cal 1

Workforce seniority mix

Aggregated from 4 classified profile signals.

Largest seniority band
Individual contributor
4 of 4 classified profile signals, 2 with visible contact data.
Limited seniority evidence: Seniority graph spans 4 classified profile signals across 1 tier, with reachable evidence for 2.
Individual contributor 4 profiles
100.0% of classified seniority signals, 2 with visible contact data

Workforce geography

Aggregated from 4 visible profile location signals.

Workforce geography evidence
Corroborated workforce geography evidence
Workforce geography spans 3 locations across 4 visible profile signals, with reachable evidence across 2 locations. Top workforce hub shares company country.
Distribution signal
Multi-location workforce
Visible profile location signals span 3 locations, led by Portland, Oregon, United States.
Workforce distribution model
Multi-hub workforce model
Visible profile locations form multiple hubs across 3 locations, led by Portland, Oregon, United States at 50%.
Corroborated workforce model evidence: Workforce model evidence combines 4 located profile signals, 3 workforce locations, 2 cities, 1 country, top hub Portland, Oregon, United States at 50%, company-location alignment, and 2 reachable locations.
Locations
3
Countries
1
Top hub share
50%
Workforce location footprint
Two-city workforce footprint
Visible profile locations span 2 cities across 1 country, led by Portland.
Cities
2
Countries
1
Company-location alignment
Top workforce hub shares company country
The largest visible workforce location is Portland, Oregon, United States, in the same country as company location Hillsboro, Or, United States.
Top workforce hub share: 50.0%
Company-location evidence tier: Corroborated company-location alignment evidence. Company-location alignment evidence combines company location Hillsboro, Or, United States, top workforce hub Portland, Oregon, United States, 50.0% top workforce hub share, and country match.
Contactable location spread
Multi-location contact coverage
Visible contact samples span 2 workforce locations, led by Hillsboro, Oregon, United States.
Contactable location evidence tier: Multi-location contactable evidence. Contactable location evidence combines 2 contactable profile location signals, 2 workforce locations, top contactable hub Hillsboro, Oregon, United States at 50.0%, and company-location alignment.
Contactable workforce hub matches company location: The largest contactable workforce location is Hillsboro, Oregon, United States, matching the company location Hillsboro, Or, United States. Top contactable hub share: 50.0%.
Hillsboro, Oregon, United States 1 contact
50.0% of contactable location signals
Portland, Oregon, United States 1 contact
50.0% of contactable location signals
Portland, Oregon, United States 2 profiles
50.0% of visible location signals
Hillsboro, Oregon, United States 1 profile
25.0% of visible location signals
Portland, Oregon Metropolitan Area, United States 1 profile
25.0% of visible location signals

Role and function mix

4 visible titled profiles across 4 distinct role titles.

Title mix
Diverse role title sample
4 distinct role titles across 4 visible titled profiles.
Role-title evidence tier: Diverse role-title evidence. Role-title diversity evidence combines 4 visible titled profiles, 4 distinct role titles, and top title Embedded Software Engineer at 25.0%.
Contactable role coverage
Mixed contactable role coverage
2 reachable role titles, led by Embedded Software Engineer at 50.0% of contactable titled profiles.
Contactable role evidence tier: Corroborated contactable role evidence. Contactable role evidence combines 2 contactable titled profiles, 2 reachable role titles, and top reachable role Embedded Software Engineer at 50.0%.
Role title reachability
Partial role-title reachability
2 of 4 distinct visible role titles include email or phone signals.
Role-title reachability evidence tier: Corroborated role-title reachability evidence. Role-title reachability evidence combines 4 visible role titles, 2 reachable titles, and 50.0% title reachability.
Embedded Software Engineer 1 profile
25.0% of visible titled profiles
Mechanical Engineering Student at Cal 1 profile
25.0% of visible titled profiles
Patent Attorney @ Edmondson Ip Law 1 profile
25.0% of visible titled profiles
Student at University of Oregon School 1 profile
25.0% of visible titled profiles

Contactability signals

Contactability score 50.0%
2 of 4 visible profiles include email or phone signals.
Contact channel mix
Multi-channel contact coverage
Visible profile or company source data includes email and phone channels.
Contact evidence tier
Current email evidence
1 current or verified email signal available; raw addresses are hidden.
Contact data safety
Corroborated privacy-safe contact intelligence
AeroLeads exposes contact counts, channel mix, freshness, and domain-alignment evidence while hiding raw email addresses and masking phone numbers in public output.
Aggregate signals
4
Channel coverage
Email and phone aggregate coverage
Evidence groups
3
Corroborated contact-safety evidence: Contact-safety evidence combines visible profile contact sample, support channels, and current email metadata; public schema uses aggregate variables only.
Aggregate-only contact schema: Dataset variables use counts, rates, channel labels, freshness bands, and domain-alignment metrics instead of raw contact values.
Email usability mix
Professional email coverage sample
AeroLeads source data includes 3 unique visible email signals; 1 is marked current or verified and 2 are professional-type. Raw addresses are hidden.
Email usability evidence tier: Current email usability evidence. Email usability evidence combines 3 unique email signals, 1 current or verified, 2 professional-type, and 33.3% current signal rate; raw addresses are hidden.
1 current or verified 2 professional-type 33.3% current signal rate
Visible people
4
With contact data
2
Email coverage
2
50.0% of visible profiles
Company support channels
Email and phone
Company record includes support email and phone contact channels.
Support channel evidence tier: Dual-channel support evidence. Support evidence combines email and phone channels from the company record; raw contact values are hidden.

Email domain intelligence

0 of 3 visible email signals match jensorter.com.

Non-official email coverage: Visible email signals use non-official domains only.
Email identity evidence tier: Non-official email identity evidence. Email identity evidence combines 3 visible email signals, 2 other-domain signals, and 1 personal-domain signal.
0.0% domain match 0 people with official-domain email 3 non-official email signals

Explore related pages

Related company intelligence:

Jensorter manufactures fish egg sorters and counters including five models of fish egg sorters, one stand-alone fish egg counter for salmonid species and a cool-water species fish fry counter (see Products tab). Our equipment may be purchased, or it may be leased from Jensorter on a monthly basis. New fish egg sorters and counters are shipped within thirty days from receipt of your order. All new fish egg sorters and counters are guaranteed for one year. Reconditioned Jensorter models are also for sale as they become available from the leasing program. Reconditioned units are guaranteed for 90 days. Jensorter services and repairs all of the fish hatchery equipment it manufactures. Service personnel are available to answer questions Monday through Friday from 7 a.m. until 6 p.m., Pacific time. In addition to its own equipment, Jensorter offers service and repair for most makes and models of fish egg sorters and counters, testing of new aquaculture products and troubleshooting for established fish egg sorters and counters.

Company source details

Employees
5
Founded
1980
Address
Hillsboro, Or, United States
Phone signal
Phone signal available; raw number hidden
Email signal
Email signal available; raw address hidden
Industry
Biotechnology Research
NAICS
Research and Development in Biotechnology (except Nanobiotechnology)
HQ
Hillsboro, OR
Explore visible people signals for JENSORTER by role, title, or keyword.

2 of 4 visible profiles include email or phone signals in AeroLeads.

JENSORTER Questions

JENSORTER people graph sample