Landcraft Projects Ltd

Landcraft Projects Ltd Intelligence, Employees & Contact Signals

Contact coverage
Email + phone
Visible profile or company source data includes email and phone channels. 2 visible profiles include direct contact evidence.
People graph depth
8 signals
Deep profile graph across 2 mapped departments.
Account research
6 steps
Account research checklist combines best covered outreach path, ICP fit, technology workforce evidence, related-company graph, domain trust, and people graph depth; raw contact values are hidden.
Technology talent
1
Technology-oriented role signals in the workforce graph.
Evidence quality 100/100 Priority intelligence record

AeroLeads company intelligence

Landcraft Projects Ltd workforce and contactability signals

Evidence from AeroLeads company records, matched professional profiles, and related company graph.

High confidence
Intelligence completeness
Strong intelligence record
7 of 11 major intelligence groups are available for this company.
Largest mapped team
IT
1 profile signals in IT.
Departments mapped
2
Workforce composition from AeroLeads profile data.
Profile graph
Deep profile graph
8 mapped workforce signals against a 19 employee size estimate.
Top reachable team
General
1 visible contact signal.
Top seniority band
Individual contributor
7 of 9 classified profile signals.
Visible contact sample
2
Displayed people with email or phone data.

Profile graph researchability

Visible people graph includes 11 visible people: 11 named, 9 titled, 11 located, and 2 contactable.

Multi-signal profile graph
Profile coverage evidence tier: Deep profile coverage evidence. Profile coverage evidence combines 8 mapped workforce signals, 19 employee size estimate, and 42.1% profile graph coverage.
Corroborated profile graph evidence: Researchability is based on 11 visible people with 4 populated evidence dimensions: named, titled, located, and contactable signals.
Profile association confidence: Corroborated profile association. Association confidence combines 9 titled profiles, 2 official-domain email profiles, 1 titled profiles with official-domain email, 2 located profiles with official-domain email, and 2 contactable profiles.
People
11
Named
11
Titled
9
Located
11
Contactable
2

Data methodology

AeroLeads renders only source-backed fields for this company page.

5 source groups
Company record Matched profile graph Email-pattern aggregate Related company graph Company signal fields
Blank source fields are omitted
Related companies are ordered deterministically
Structured data uses aggregate counts only

Intelligence completeness

7 of 11 major intelligence groups are available for this company.

7 / 11 groups
Strong intelligence record 63.6%
Workforce composition Contactability Email intelligence Decision makers Technology talent Domain confidence Market and peer context

Evidence quality

This page clears the 60+ AeroLeads company-intelligence evidence threshold.

100 / 100
Priority intelligence record Threshold 60+
Workforce composition Employee email coverage Employee phone coverage Department contactability Official-domain department contactability Department seniority map
Workforce graph
25 signals
Workforce composition, Department contactability, Official-domain department contactability
Contactability
9 signals
Employee email coverage, Employee phone coverage, Email pattern intelligence
Decision-maker intelligence
10 signals
Decision-maker coverage, Leadership signals, Department leadership coverage
Technology intelligence
1 signal
Technology talent
Market and peer context
13 signals
Related company graph, Peer graph strength, Peer position benchmark
Company momentum
3 signals
Company signal breadth, Company momentum score, Company ownership signal
Source trust
10 signals
Domain confidence, Multi-source domain alignment, Intelligence completeness
65 additional source-backed evidence signals are counted in this page quality score.

Prospecting readiness

Landcraft Projects Ltd shows strong prospecting fit based on person-level contact coverage, best covered outreach path, decision-maker coverage, and technology workforce evidence.

80 / 100
Strong prospecting fit High-confidence prospecting evidence

Prospecting evidence combines person-level contact coverage, best covered outreach path, decision-maker coverage, technology workforce evidence, and people graph depth; raw contact values are hidden.

ICP fit
Qualified ICP fit

ICP fit combines company size, market specificity, contactability, technology path, and domain trust; raw contact values are hidden.

70 / 100
Company size
19 employees
Employee estimate is in a common outbound prospecting range.
Market specificity
Focused market profile
12 market classification signals across categories, specialties, and related peer industries.
Reachability
High-confidence contact evidence
2 current or verified professional email signals, and multi-channel contact coverage; raw addresses and numbers are hidden.
Technology path
Mapped technology evidence
1 matched technology role signal found in the workforce graph.
Domain trust
Corroborated domain alignment
Domain evidence combines website domain, social profile, employee email alignment, and profile-domain association; raw email addresses are hidden.
Account research checklist
Multi-step account research checklist

Account research checklist combines best covered outreach path, ICP fit, technology workforce evidence, related-company graph, domain trust, and people graph depth; raw contact values are hidden.

6 steps
Confirm contact path
General + Director
Outreach path evidence combines 1 visible General contact signal, 1 contactable Director decision-maker signal, and 1 official-domain decision-maker email signal; raw contacts are hidden.
Validate ICP fit
Qualified ICP fit
ICP fit combines company size, market specificity, contactability, technology path, and domain trust; raw contact values are hidden.
Review technology path
Mapped technology evidence
1 matched technology role signal found in the workforce graph.
Compare related peers
Limited peer comparison
Compares this company with related-company evidence across employee scale and peer graph evidence.
Check domain trust
Corroborated domain alignment
Domain evidence combines website domain, social profile, employee email alignment, and profile-domain association; raw email addresses are hidden.
Review people graph depth
Deep profile graph
8 mapped workforce signals against a 19 employee size estimate.
Contact coverage
High-confidence contact evidence
2 current or verified professional email signals, and multi-channel contact coverage; raw addresses and numbers are hidden.
Best outreach path
General + Director
Coverage combines 1 visible General contact signal, 1 contactable Director decision-maker signal, and 1 official-domain decision-maker email signal.
Decision-maker coverage
Partial decision-maker reachability
Some mapped decision-maker signals include visible contact data.
Technology contact path
Mapped technology evidence
1 matched technology role signal found in the workforce graph.

Domain trust signals

Domain confidence for landcraft-projects.co.uk is based on website domain, social profile, employee email alignment, and profile-domain association.

70 / 100
Corroborated domain alignment Corroborated domain evidence

Domain evidence combines website domain, social profile, employee email alignment, and profile-domain association; raw email addresses are hidden.

Website domain
landcraft-projects.co.uk
The official website domain is available from the company source record.
Social profile
LinkedIn organization page
A LinkedIn organization page is present for this company record.
Employee email alignment
2 official-domain email signals
100% of visible employee email signals match landcraft-projects.co.uk; raw addresses are hidden.
Profile-domain association
2 people with official-domain email
Matched people include official-domain email evidence; raw addresses are hidden.

AeroLeads coverage snapshot

Profile sample
4
Visible people attached to this company page.
Profile graph depth
Deep profile graph
8 mapped workforce signals against a 19 employee size estimate.
Contactable sample
2
Visible people with email or phone data.
Contact channel mix
Multi-channel contact coverage
Visible profile or company source data includes email and phone channels.
Contact evidence confidence
High-confidence contact evidence
2 current or verified professional email signals, and multi-channel contact coverage; raw addresses and numbers are hidden.
Department coverage
2
Departments represented in AeroLeads workforce signals.
Department concentration
Department-concentrated workforce
Most mapped workforce signals are in General.
Leadership signals
1
Department lead or leadership signals in the org data.
Department leader sample
Limited department leader sample
AeroLeads source data includes 1 leadership signal across 1 department; rows show titles and contact-channel presence only.
Department leadership coverage
Focused department leadership coverage
Leadership signals appear in 1 of 2 mapped departments.
Leadership density
12.50
Percent of mapped department signals that are leadership signals.
Department contact coverage
1
Departments with visible contact samples.
Department contact spread
Focused department contact spread
Visible contact samples appear in 1 of 2 mapped departments.
Official-domain department contactability
Single-department official-domain coverage
1 of 2 mapped departments include visible company-domain email signals.
Department seniority map
Two-department seniority map
Visible department samples map 8 seniority-classified profiles across 2 departments and 2 seniority bands.
Technology talent
1
Visible profiles matching technology role patterns.
Technology evidence confidence
Mapped technology evidence
1 matched technology role signal found in the workforce graph.
Technology department signals
1
Mapped department profile signals in technology-oriented teams.
Email-pattern variants
1
Distinct matched business email patterns.
Official-domain emails
2
Email signals matching landcraft-projects.co.uk.
Email domain confidence
Strong official-domain coverage
Most visible email signals match landcraft-projects.co.uk.
Domain confidence
Corroborated domain alignment
Domain confidence for landcraft-projects.co.uk is based on website domain, social profile, employee email alignment, and profile-domain association.
Email usability mix
Strong current professional email coverage
AeroLeads source data includes 2 unique visible email signals; 2 are marked current or verified and 2 are professional-type. Raw addresses are hidden.
Contact data safety
Limited privacy-safe contact intelligence
AeroLeads exposes contact counts, channel mix, freshness, and domain-alignment evidence while hiding raw email addresses and masking phone numbers in public output.
Company signal breadth
Multi-signal company record
Company-level signals include social audience, company maturity, and ownership.
Company momentum score
Limited company momentum score
Momentum score blends contactability and peer position from AeroLeads company and profile evidence.
Company ownership signal
Private company record
Company source record includes source type Privately Held.
Audience density
Moderate audience density
786 followers against 19 employee estimate, about 41.40 followers per estimated employee.
Specialty signals
6
Specialty tags in the company record.
Market specificity
Focused market profile
12 market classification signals across categories, specialties, and related peer industries.
Peer industry clusters
8
Industries represented by related company records.
Related companies
10
Company graph links available for comparison.
Industry benchmark
Peer-informed industry benchmark
Industry benchmark uses 10 related companies, 3 benchmark dimensions, and 3 peer evidence types from the AeroLeads related-company graph.
Peer benchmark confidence
Multi-signal peer benchmark evidence
Peer benchmark combines 10 related companies with peer graph strength, size benchmark, and size position. Underlying peer graph includes 3 evidence types: employee benchmarks, website records, social profiles.
Peer position benchmark
Employee-scale peer position benchmark
Peer-position benchmark shows employee scale above 66.7% of 9 comparable related peers.
Peer comparison matrix
Limited peer comparison
Compares this company with related-company evidence across employee scale and peer graph evidence.
Workforce locations
10
Locations represented in visible profile signals.
Workforce distribution
Distributed workforce
Visible profile location signals are spread across 10 locations.
Workforce location footprint
Multi-country workforce footprint
Visible profile locations span 10 cities across 2 countries, led by United Kingdom.
Workforce distribution model
International distributed workforce model
Visible profile locations span 2 countries and 10 workforce locations; no single hub exceeds 18% of visible location signals.
Workforce geography evidence confidence
High-confidence workforce geography evidence
Workforce geography spans 10 locations across 11 visible profile signals, with reachable evidence across 2 locations and company-domain evidence across 2 locations. Top workforce hub differs from company location.
Contactable workforce locations
2
Workforce locations represented by visible contact samples.
Top contactable workforce location
Greater Swansea Area, United Kingdom
Visible contact samples span 2 workforce locations, led by Greater Swansea Area, United Kingdom.
Workforce seniority tiers
3
Seniority bands derived from visible profile titles and levels.
Seniority evidence confidence
Corroborated seniority evidence
Seniority graph spans 9 classified profile signals across 3 tiers, with reachable evidence for 1 and company-domain evidence for 1. Contributor-heavy visible sample.
Classified seniority profiles
9
Visible profiles with usable seniority signals.
Official-domain seniority profiles
Official-domain seniority evidence
1 seniority-classified profile across 1 tier includes company-domain email signals.
Management-to-IC proxy
Contributor-heavy visible sample
2 managerial seniority signals and 7 contributor signals appear in the visible seniority-classified sample.
Role title diversity
Diverse role title sample
8 distinct role titles across 9 visible titled profiles.
Visible role titles
8
Distinct role titles found in visible profile signals.
Decision-maker signals
2
Visible profiles matching seniority or leadership title patterns.
Decision-maker reachability
Partial decision-maker reachability
Some mapped decision-maker signals include visible contact data.
Decision-maker contactability rate
50
Percent of mapped decision-maker signals with visible contact data.
Official-domain decision-maker coverage
Strong official-domain decision-maker coverage
Most contactable decision-maker signals use landcraft-projects.co.uk email coverage.
Official-domain decision-maker contacts
1
Contactable decision-maker signals with official-domain email coverage.
Best covered outreach path
General + Director
Coverage combines 1 visible General contact signal, 1 contactable Director decision-maker signal, and 1 official-domain decision-maker email signal.
Prospecting fit
Strong prospecting fit
Landcraft Projects Ltd shows strong prospecting fit based on person-level contact coverage, best covered outreach path, decision-maker coverage, and technology workforce evidence.
ICP fit
Qualified ICP fit
Landcraft Projects Ltd matches the qualified ICP fit band for common outbound filters based on company size, market specificity, contactability, technology path, and domain trust.
Account research checklist
Multi-step account research checklist
Account research checklist combines best covered outreach path, ICP fit, technology workforce evidence, related-company graph, domain trust, and people graph depth; raw contact values are hidden.
Intelligence signal groups
22
AeroLeads signal groups available for this company.

Market focus signals

Primary industry
Civil Engineering
Market specificity
Focused market profile
12 market classification signals across categories, specialties, and related peer industries.
Market evidence tier
High-confidence market evidence
Market evidence combines 12 classification signals from categories, specialties, related peer industries, and description keywords. 5 description-backed keyword signals are included.
Industry benchmark
Peer-informed industry benchmark
Industry benchmark uses 10 related companies, 3 benchmark dimensions, and 3 peer evidence types from the AeroLeads related-company graph.
Top peer industry
Construction
30% of 10 related peer industry signals.
Peer benchmark evidence
Multi-signal peer benchmark evidence
Peer benchmark combines 10 related companies with peer graph strength, size benchmark, and size position. Underlying peer graph includes 3 evidence types: employee benchmarks, website records, social profiles.
Size position
Larger than most related peers
6 of 9 related employee-estimated peers are lower.
Peer graph strength
Partial peer evidence graph
Related peer graph has employee benchmarks, website records, and social profiles across 10 related companies.
Benchmark dimensions: peer graph strength, size benchmark, and size position.
Categories
Civil Engineering
Specialties
Hard Landscaping Soft Landscaping Grounds Maintenance Resin Paving Vegetation Clearance Works Problem Weed Control
Product-market keyword evidence
Description-backed market keywords
Keyword evidence comes from 3 source field groups: Category, Specialty, Description.
Product-market keyword evidence tier: High-confidence product-market keyword evidence. Product-market keyword evidence combines 12 unique market keywords, 3 source field groups, and 5 description-backed keywords (1 category, 6 specialty, and 5 description).
Civil Engineering · Category Hard Landscaping · Specialty Soft Landscaping · Specialty Grounds Maintenance · Specialty Resin Paving · Specialty Vegetation Clearance Works · Specialty Problem Weed Control · Specialty leading provider · Description commercial landscape sports · Description south wales region · Description local authority housing · Description commercial clients throughout · Description
Related peer industries
Peer-industry evidence tier: High-confidence peer-industry evidence. Peer-industry evidence combines 10 related companies, 5 peer-industry clusters, and top peer industry Construction at 30.0%.
Construction 3 peers
30.0% of related peer industries
Real Estate 1 peer
10.0% of related peer industries
Spectator Sports 1 peer
10.0% of related peer industries
Utilities 1 peer
10.0% of related peer industries
Water Supply and Irrigation Systems 1 peer
10.0% of related peer industries

Company signals

Company signal breadth
Multi-signal company record
Company-level signals include social audience, company maturity, and ownership.
Corroborated company record evidence: Company record evidence combines 3 source-backed company signal types: social audience, company maturity, and ownership.
Social audience
786
Followers in the company source record.
Social audience evidence tier: Limited social-audience evidence. Social audience evidence uses 786 followers from source field social_followers.
Audience density
Moderate audience density
786 followers against 19 employee estimate, about 41.40 followers per estimated employee.
Audience-density evidence tier: Limited audience-density evidence. Audience-density evidence combines 786 social followers, 19 employee estimate, and 41.40 followers per estimated employee.
Company maturity
Mature company record
Company source record includes founding year 1992, about 34 years before 2026.
Company maturity evidence tier: Long-running maturity evidence. Maturity evidence combines founding year 1992, 34 years of company history, and source field founded.
Company ownership
Private company record
Company source record includes source type Privately Held.
Company ownership evidence tier: Structured ownership evidence. Ownership evidence combines source type Privately Held from structured company source fields.

Workforce composition

Department concentration
Department-concentrated workforce
Most mapped workforce signals are in General. 87.5% of mapped department signals are in the largest department.
Department concentration evidence tier: Concentrated department evidence. Department concentration evidence combines 2 mapped departments, top department General, and 87.5% top-department share.
Department leadership coverage
Focused department leadership coverage
Leadership signals appear in 1 of 2 mapped departments. Leadership signals represent 12.5% of mapped department signals.
Department leadership evidence tier: Limited department leadership evidence. Department leadership evidence combines 1 leadership signal, 1 of 2 mapped departments, and 12.5% leadership density.
Department seniority map
Two-department seniority map
Visible department samples map 8 seniority-classified profiles across 2 departments and 2 seniority bands.
Department seniority evidence tier: Corroborated department seniority evidence. Department seniority evidence combines 8 seniority-classified profiles, 2 departments, 2 seniority bands, and top cell General + Individual contributor with 6 profiles.
General 7 profiles
Manager: 1 Individual contributor: 6
IT 1 profile
Individual contributor: 1
1 leadership signals 1 departments with visible contacts
Department leader sample
Limited department leader sample
0 contactable

AeroLeads source data includes 1 leadership signal across 1 department; rows show titles and contact-channel presence only.

Department leader evidence tier: Limited department leader evidence. Department leader evidence combines 1 leadership signal and 1 department; raw contacts are hidden.
Leader Department Seniority Channel
David Vaughan
Contracts Manager
 General Manager No visible contact channel
General 7 signals
87.5% of mapped department signals, 1 leadership signals, 1 visible contact
IT 1 signals
12.5% of mapped department signals

Technology talent signals

1 matched technology role signals.

Technology evidence tier
Mapped technology evidence
1 matched technology role signal found in the workforce graph.
1 IT department signals
Engineering 1 profile
100.0% of matched technology role signals
Matched role examples
Civil Engineer 1

Workforce seniority mix

Aggregated from 9 classified profile signals.

Largest seniority band
Individual contributor
7 of 9 classified profile signals.
Official-domain seniority evidence: 1 seniority-classified profile across 1 tier includes company-domain email signals.
Corroborated seniority evidence: Seniority graph spans 9 classified profile signals across 3 tiers, with reachable evidence for 1 and company-domain evidence for 1. Contributor-heavy visible sample.
Management-to-IC proxy
Contributor-heavy visible sample
22.2%
managerial seniority signals
77.8%
contributor seniority signals
2 managerial seniority signals and 7 contributor signals appear in the visible seniority-classified sample.
Management-shape evidence tier: Contributor-heavy management-shape evidence. Management-shape evidence combines 9 seniority-classified signals, 2 managerial signals, 22.2% managerial share, and 7 contributor signals.
Individual contributor 7 profiles
77.8% of classified seniority signals
Director 1 profile
11.1% of classified seniority signals, 1 with visible contact data, 1 official-domain
Manager 1 profile
11.1% of classified seniority signals

Workforce geography

Aggregated from 11 visible profile location signals.

Workforce geography evidence
High-confidence workforce geography evidence
Workforce geography spans 10 locations across 11 visible profile signals, with reachable evidence across 2 locations and company-domain evidence across 2 locations. Top workforce hub differs from company location.
Distribution signal
Distributed workforce
Visible profile location signals are spread across 10 locations.
Workforce distribution model
International distributed workforce model
Visible profile locations span 2 countries and 10 workforce locations; no single hub exceeds 18% of visible location signals.
High-confidence workforce model evidence: Workforce model evidence combines 11 located profile signals, 10 workforce locations, 10 cities, 2 countries, top hub United Kingdom at 18%, company-location alignment, 2 reachable locations, and 2 company-domain locations.
Locations
10
Countries
2
Top hub share
18%
Workforce location footprint
Multi-country workforce footprint
Visible profile locations span 10 cities across 2 countries, led by United Kingdom.
Cities
10
Countries
2
Company-location alignment
Top workforce hub differs from company location
The largest visible workforce location is United Kingdom, while the company location is Cardiff, United Kingdom.
Top workforce hub share: 18.2%
Company-location evidence tier: Workforce-location divergence evidence. Company-location alignment evidence combines company location Cardiff, United Kingdom, top workforce hub United Kingdom, 18.2% top workforce hub share, and location difference.
Contactable location spread
Multi-location contact coverage
Visible contact samples span 2 workforce locations, led by Greater Swansea Area, United Kingdom.
Contactable location evidence tier: Multi-location contactable evidence. Contactable location evidence combines 2 contactable profile location signals, 2 workforce locations, top contactable hub Greater Swansea Area, United Kingdom at 50.0%, and company-location alignment.
Contactable workforce hub shares company country: The largest contactable workforce location is Greater Swansea Area, United Kingdom, in the same country as company location Cardiff, United Kingdom. Top contactable hub share: 50.0%.
Greater Swansea Area, United Kingdom 1 contact
50.0% of contactable location signals
Greater Cardiff Area, United Kingdom 1 contact
50.0% of contactable location signals
Official-domain location spread
Multi-location official-domain workforce
Company-domain email profile locations span 2 workforce locations, led by Greater Swansea Area, United Kingdom.
2 profiles with landcraft-projects.co.uk email evidence include location signals.
Official-domain location evidence tier: Multi-location official-domain evidence. Official-domain location evidence combines 2 official-domain profile location signals, 2 workforce locations, top official-domain hub Greater Swansea Area, United Kingdom at 50.0%, and company-location alignment.
Official-domain workforce hub shares company country: The largest company-domain email workforce location is Greater Swansea Area, United Kingdom, in the same country as company location Cardiff, United Kingdom. Top official-domain hub share: 50.0%.
Greater Swansea Area, United Kingdom 1 profile
50.0% of official-domain location signals
Greater Cardiff Area, United Kingdom 1 profile
50.0% of official-domain location signals
United Kingdom 2 profiles
18.2% of visible location signals
Caerphilly, Wales, United Kingdom 1 profile
9.1% of visible location signals
Greater Swansea Area, United Kingdom 1 profile
9.1% of visible location signals
Greater Cardiff Area, United Kingdom 1 profile
9.1% of visible location signals
Brecon, Wales, United Kingdom 1 profile
9.1% of visible location signals
Newport, Wales, United Kingdom 1 profile
9.1% of visible location signals

Decision-maker coverage

2 seniority signals, 1 with visible contact data.

Decision-maker evidence tier
Mapped decision-maker evidence
Decision-maker evidence covers 2 seniority signals, 1 reachable, and 1 company-domain.
Account planning snapshot
Multi-signal account planning snapshot
Snapshot combines department reachability, decision-maker coverage, and buying-committee function aggregates.
3 account-planning evidence cards available.
Account planning evidence tier: Corroborated account planning evidence. Account planning evidence combines 3 aggregate account-planning cards, best covered outreach path, 1 official-domain decision-maker signal, Director seniority reachability, and General department contactability; raw contacts are hidden.
Best covered path
General + Director
Coverage combines 1 visible General contact signal, 1 contactable Director decision-maker signal, and 1 official-domain decision-maker email signal.
Most reachable seniority
Director
1 of 1 signals in this seniority band include visible contact data.
Top reachable team
General
1 visible contact signal in this department sample.
Partial decision-maker reachability 50.0%
Some mapped decision-maker signals include visible contact data.
Decision-maker reachability evidence tier: Partial decision-maker reachability evidence. Decision-maker reachability evidence combines 1 contactable decision-maker signal, 2 mapped decision-maker signals, 50.0% contactability, 1 official-domain decision-maker signal, and 1 dual-channel signal.
Email and phone decision-maker coverage: Mapped decision-maker signals include 1 email signal, 1 phone signal, and 1 with both channels.
Most reachable seniority
Director
1 of 1 seniority signals include visible contact data.
Seniority reachability evidence tier: High-confidence seniority reachability evidence. Seniority reachability evidence combines 1 contactable Director signal, 1 Director signal, 100.0% tier contactability, 1 official-domain Director signal, and email and phone coverage.
Official-domain decision-maker coverage
Strong official-domain decision-maker coverage
1 contactable decision-maker signals match landcraft-projects.co.uk. Most contactable decision-maker signals use landcraft-projects.co.uk email coverage.
Official-domain decision-maker evidence tier: Strong official-domain decision-maker evidence. Official-domain decision-maker evidence combines 1 official-domain decision-maker signal, 1 contactable decision-maker signal, 100.0% official-domain coverage, and landcraft-projects.co.uk domain match.
Director 1 profile
50.0% of mapped seniority signals, 1 with visible contact data
Manager 1 profile
50.0% of mapped seniority signals

Role and function mix

9 visible titled profiles across 8 distinct role titles.

Title mix
Diverse role title sample
8 distinct role titles across 9 visible titled profiles.
Role-title evidence tier: Diverse role-title evidence. Role-title diversity evidence combines 9 visible titled profiles, 8 distinct role titles, and top title Landscaper at Landcraft Projects Ltd at 22.2%.
Landscaper at Landcraft Projects Ltd 2 profiles
22.2% of visible titled profiles
Civil Engineer 1 profile
11.1% of visible titled profiles
Contracts Manager 1 profile
11.1% of visible titled profiles
Foreman at Landcaft Projects 1 profile
11.1% of visible titled profiles
Foreman at Landcraft Projects Limited 1 profile
11.1% of visible titled profiles
Landscape Foreman at Landcraft Projects Ltd 1 profile
11.1% of visible titled profiles

Contactability signals

Contactability score 50.0%
2 of 4 visible profiles include email or phone signals.
Contact channel mix
Multi-channel contact coverage
Visible profile or company source data includes email and phone channels.
Contact evidence tier
High-confidence contact evidence
2 current or verified professional email signals, and multi-channel contact coverage; raw addresses and numbers are hidden.
Contact data safety
Limited privacy-safe contact intelligence
AeroLeads exposes contact counts, channel mix, freshness, and domain-alignment evidence while hiding raw email addresses and masking phone numbers in public output.
Aggregate signals
2
Channel coverage
Email and phone aggregate coverage
Evidence groups
2
Limited contact-safety evidence: Contact-safety evidence combines visible profile contact sample and current email metadata; public schema uses aggregate variables only.
Aggregate-only contact schema: Dataset variables use counts, rates, channel labels, freshness bands, and domain-alignment metrics instead of raw contact values.
Best covered outreach path
General + Director
Coverage combines 1 visible General contact signal, 1 contactable Director decision-maker signal, and 1 official-domain decision-maker email signal.
Outreach path evidence tier: Corroborated outreach path evidence. Outreach path evidence combines 1 visible General contact signal, 1 contactable Director decision-maker signal, and 1 official-domain decision-maker email signal; raw contacts are hidden.
Email usability mix
Strong current professional email coverage
AeroLeads source data includes 2 unique visible email signals; 2 are marked current or verified and 2 are professional-type. Raw addresses are hidden.
Email usability evidence tier: Corroborated email usability evidence. Email usability evidence combines 2 unique email signals, 2 current or verified, 2 professional-type, and 100.0% current signal rate; raw addresses are hidden.
2 current or verified 2 professional-type 100.0% current signal rate
Visible people
4
With contact data
2
Email coverage
2
50.0% of visible profiles
Phone coverage
1
25.0% of visible profiles

Email domain intelligence

2 of 2 visible email signals match landcraft-projects.co.uk.

Strong official-domain coverage: Most visible email signals match landcraft-projects.co.uk.
Email identity evidence tier: Corroborated email identity evidence. Email identity evidence combines 2 visible email signals, 2 matching landcraft-projects.co.uk, 2 people with official-domain email, and 100.0% official-domain match.
100.0% domain match 2 people with official-domain email

Department contact samples

Focused department contact spread: Visible contact samples appear in 1 of 2 mapped departments.
Department contactability evidence tier: Limited department contactability evidence. Department contactability evidence combines 1 visible contact sample, 1 of 2 mapped departments, 1 email signal, and 1 official-domain email signal; raw contacts are hidden.
Official-domain department coverage
Single-department official-domain coverage
1 of 2 mapped departments include visible company-domain email signals.
Department Contacts Email Official email Phone
General 1 1 1 0
Top email pattern: first.last at 100.0% of matched patterns.
Format example: [first].[last]@landcraft-projects.co.uk
Dominant pattern: One email pattern accounts for most matched examples.
Email pattern evidence tier: High-confidence email pattern evidence. Email pattern evidence combines 1 matched pattern, 100.0% top-pattern share, and format example for landcraft-projects.co.uk.
first.last 100.0%

Explore related pages

Landcraft Projects Ltd email format Landcraft Projects Ltd management graph and contactability signals

Related company intelligence:

2 of 4 visible Landcraft Projects Ltd profiles include email or phone signals. Review people graph
The strongest Landcraft Projects Ltd email pattern signal is [first].[last] , representing 100.0% of matched email-pattern evidence in the AeroLeads company graph.
In total, AeroLeads has detected 1 aggregate email-pattern signals for Landcraft Projects Ltd. View the detailed email format page .

Landcraft Projects Ltd Email Pattern Intelligence Snapshot

These aggregate patterns support the company intelligence page. The dedicated email-format workflow lives on Landcraft Projects Ltd email format .

Observed pattern
Example pattern
[first].[last]
[first].[last]@landcraft-projects.co.uk
100%

Landcraft Projects Ltd Questions

Landcraft Projects Ltd people graph sample