LM Law Group
Company intelligence

LM Law Group Company Intelligence, Employees & Contact Signals

Contact coverage
Email + phone
Visible profile or company source data includes email and phone channels. 2 visible profiles include direct contact evidence.
People graph depth
4 signals
4 mapped workforce signals against a 11 employee size estimate.
Account research
5 steps
Account research checklist combines person-level contact coverage, ICP fit, related-company graph, domain trust, and people graph depth; raw contact values are hidden.
Email domain match
50% match
Official-domain coverage across 2 of 4 visible email signals for lmlawgroup.com.
Evidence quality 100/100 Priority intelligence record

AeroLeads company intelligence

LM Law Group workforce and contactability signals

Evidence from AeroLeads company records, matched professional profiles, and related company graph.

High confidence
Intelligence completeness
Partial intelligence record
5 of 11 major intelligence groups are available for this company.
Profile graph
Deep profile graph
4 mapped workforce signals against a 11 employee size estimate.
Top seniority band
Individual contributor
4 of 4 classified profile signals.
Visible contact sample
2
Displayed people with email or phone data.
Social followers
856
Audience size from company social data.
Funding signal
1 investor
1 named investor.

Profile graph researchability

Visible people graph includes 4 visible people: 4 named, 4 titled, 3 located, and 2 contactable.

Profile research sample
Profile coverage evidence tier: Deep profile coverage evidence. Profile coverage evidence combines 4 mapped workforce signals, 11 employee size estimate, and 36.4% profile graph coverage.
Corroborated profile graph evidence: Researchability is based on 4 visible people with 4 populated evidence dimensions: named, titled, located, and contactable signals.
Profile association confidence: Corroborated profile association. Association confidence combines 4 titled profiles, 2 official-domain email profiles, 2 titled profiles with official-domain email, 2 located profiles with official-domain email, and 2 contactable profiles.
People
4
Named
4
Titled
4
Located
3
Contactable
2

Data methodology

AeroLeads renders only source-backed fields for this company page.

5 source groups
Company record Matched profile graph Email-pattern aggregate Related company graph Company signal fields
Blank source fields are omitted
Related companies are ordered deterministically
Structured data uses aggregate counts only

Intelligence completeness

5 of 11 major intelligence groups are available for this company.

5 / 11 groups
Partial intelligence record 45.5%
Workforce composition Contactability Email intelligence Domain confidence Market and peer context

Evidence quality

This page clears the 60+ AeroLeads company-intelligence evidence threshold.

100 / 100
Priority intelligence record Threshold 60+
Employee email coverage Employee phone coverage Role title reachability Official-domain role title reachability Email usability mix Related company graph
Contactability
10 signals
Employee email coverage, Employee phone coverage, Email usability mix
Workforce graph
18 signals
Role title reachability, Official-domain role title reachability, Profile graph researchability
Market and peer context
14 signals
Related company graph, Peer graph strength, Peer position benchmark
Company momentum
5 signals
Company signal breadth, Company momentum score, Company ownership signal
Source trust
9 signals
Domain confidence, Multi-source domain alignment, Intelligence completeness
Decision-maker intelligence
1 signal
Account research checklist
51 additional source-backed evidence signals are counted in this page quality score.

Prospecting readiness

LM Law Group shows research-first prospecting fit based on person-level contact coverage, people graph depth, and peer context.

35 / 100
Research-first prospecting fit Corroborated prospecting evidence

Prospecting evidence combines person-level contact coverage, people graph depth, and peer context; raw contact values are hidden.

ICP fit
Qualified ICP fit

ICP fit combines company size, market specificity, contactability, and domain trust; raw contact values are hidden.

60 / 100
Company size
11 employees
Employee estimate is in a common outbound prospecting range.
Market specificity
Focused market profile
7 market classification signals across categories, specialties, and related peer industries.
Reachability
High-confidence contact evidence
2 current or verified professional email signals, and multi-channel contact coverage; raw addresses and numbers are hidden.
Domain trust
High-confidence domain alignment
Domain evidence combines website domain, social profile, employee email alignment, profile-domain association, and profile association confidence; raw email addresses are hidden.
Account research checklist
Source-backed account research checklist

Account research checklist combines person-level contact coverage, ICP fit, related-company graph, domain trust, and people graph depth; raw contact values are hidden.

5 steps
Confirm contact coverage
High-confidence contact evidence
2 current or verified professional email signals, and multi-channel contact coverage; raw addresses and numbers are hidden.
Validate ICP fit
Qualified ICP fit
ICP fit combines company size, market specificity, contactability, and domain trust; raw contact values are hidden.
Compare related peers
Limited peer comparison
Compares this company with related-company evidence across employee scale and peer graph evidence.
Check domain trust
High-confidence domain alignment
Domain evidence combines website domain, social profile, employee email alignment, profile-domain association, and profile association confidence; raw email addresses are hidden.
Review people graph depth
Deep profile graph
4 mapped workforce signals against a 11 employee size estimate.
Contact coverage
High-confidence contact evidence
2 current or verified professional email signals, and multi-channel contact coverage; raw addresses and numbers are hidden.
People graph depth
Deep profile graph
4 mapped workforce signals against a 11 employee size estimate.
Peer context
Multi-signal peer benchmark evidence
Peer benchmark combines 10 related companies with peer graph strength, size benchmark, and size position. Underlying peer graph includes 4 evidence types: industry context, employee benchmarks, website records, social profiles.
Decision-maker evidence missing: No mapped decision-maker cluster is strong enough to summarize.

Domain trust signals

Domain confidence for lmlawgroup.com is based on website domain, social profile, employee email alignment, profile-domain association, and profile association confidence.

80 / 100
High-confidence domain alignment High-confidence domain evidence

Domain evidence combines website domain, social profile, employee email alignment, profile-domain association, and profile association confidence; raw email addresses are hidden.

Website domain
lmlawgroup.com
The official website domain is available from the company source record.
Social profile
LinkedIn organization page
A LinkedIn organization page is present for this company record.
Employee email alignment
2 official-domain email signals
50% of visible employee email signals match lmlawgroup.com; raw addresses are hidden.
Profile-domain association
2 people with official-domain email
Matched people include official-domain email evidence; raw addresses are hidden.
Profile association confidence
2 titled official-domain profiles
Titled profile samples also include official-domain email evidence.

AeroLeads coverage snapshot

Profile sample
4
Visible people attached to this company page.
Profile graph depth
Deep profile graph
4 mapped workforce signals against a 11 employee size estimate.
Contactable sample
2
Visible people with email or phone data.
Contact channel mix
Multi-channel contact coverage
Visible profile or company source data includes email and phone channels.
Contact evidence confidence
High-confidence contact evidence
2 current or verified professional email signals, and multi-channel contact coverage; raw addresses and numbers are hidden.
Official-domain emails
2
Email signals matching lmlawgroup.com.
Email domain confidence
Mixed-domain coverage
Visible email signals include official-domain and non-official domains.
Domain confidence
High-confidence domain alignment
Domain confidence for lmlawgroup.com is based on website domain, social profile, employee email alignment, profile-domain association, and profile association confidence.
Email usability mix
Current email coverage sample
AeroLeads source data includes 4 unique visible email signals; 2 are marked current or verified and 2 are professional-type. Raw addresses are hidden.
Contact data safety
Limited privacy-safe contact intelligence
AeroLeads exposes contact counts, channel mix, freshness, and domain-alignment evidence while hiding raw email addresses and masking phone numbers in public output.
Company signal breadth
Multi-signal company record
Company-level signals include social audience, company maturity, ownership, and funding.
Company momentum score
Limited company momentum score
Momentum score blends contactability and peer position from AeroLeads company and profile evidence.
Company ownership signal
Private company record
Company source record includes source type Privately Held.
Audience density
Moderate audience density
856 followers against 11 employee estimate, about 77.80 followers per estimated employee.
Specialty signals
4
Specialty tags in the company record.
Market specificity
Focused market profile
7 market classification signals across categories, specialties, and related peer industries.
Peer industry clusters
2
Industries represented by related company records.
Related companies
10
Company graph links available for comparison.
Industry benchmark
Evidence-backed industry benchmark
Industry benchmark uses 10 related companies, 7 same-industry peers, 3 benchmark dimensions, and 4 peer evidence types from the AeroLeads related-company graph.
Peer benchmark confidence
Multi-signal peer benchmark evidence
Peer benchmark combines 10 related companies with peer graph strength, size benchmark, and size position. Underlying peer graph includes 4 evidence types: industry context, employee benchmarks, website records, social profiles.
Peer position benchmark
Employee-scale peer position benchmark
Peer-position benchmark shows employee scale above 30% of 10 comparable related peers.
Peer comparison matrix
Limited peer comparison
Compares this company with related-company evidence across employee scale and peer graph evidence.
Workforce locations
2
Locations represented in visible profile signals.
Workforce distribution
Multi-location workforce
Visible profile location signals span 2 locations, led by Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Workforce location footprint
Two-city workforce footprint
Visible profile locations span 2 cities across 1 country, led by Toronto.
Workforce distribution model
Workforce hub outside company location
The largest visible workforce hub is Toronto, Ontario, Canada, while the company location is Ca.
Workforce geography evidence confidence
Corroborated workforce geography evidence
Workforce geography spans 2 locations across 3 visible profile signals, with reachable evidence across 2 locations and company-domain evidence across 2 locations. Top workforce hub differs from company location.
Contactable workforce locations
2
Workforce locations represented by visible contact samples.
Top contactable workforce location
Greater Toronto Area, Canada
Visible contact samples span 2 workforce locations, led by Greater Toronto Area, Canada.
Workforce seniority tiers
1
Seniority bands derived from visible profile titles and levels.
Seniority evidence confidence
Limited seniority evidence
Seniority graph spans 4 classified profile signals across 1 tier, with reachable evidence for 2 and company-domain evidence for 2.
Classified seniority profiles
4
Visible profiles with usable seniority signals.
Official-domain seniority profiles
Multi-profile official-domain seniority evidence
2 seniority-classified profiles across 1 tier include company-domain email signals.
Role title diversity
Diverse role title sample
4 distinct role titles across 4 visible titled profiles.
Visible role titles
4
Distinct role titles found in visible profile signals.
Contactable role titles
2
Distinct role titles with visible contact samples.
Contactable role coverage
Mixed contactable role coverage
2 reachable role titles, led by Canadian Immigration Lawyer at 50.0% of contactable titled profiles.
Prospecting fit
Research-first prospecting fit
LM Law Group shows research-first prospecting fit based on person-level contact coverage, people graph depth, and peer context.
ICP fit
Qualified ICP fit
LM Law Group matches the qualified ICP fit band for common outbound filters based on company size, market specificity, contactability, and domain trust.
Account research checklist
Source-backed account research checklist
Account research checklist combines person-level contact coverage, ICP fit, related-company graph, domain trust, and people graph depth; raw contact values are hidden.
Intelligence signal groups
14
AeroLeads signal groups available for this company.

Market focus signals

Primary industry
Law Practice
Market specificity
Focused market profile
7 market classification signals across categories, specialties, and related peer industries.
Market evidence tier
High-confidence market evidence
Market evidence combines 7 classification signals from categories, specialties, related peer industries, and description keywords. 6 description-backed keyword signals are included.
Industry benchmark
Evidence-backed industry benchmark
Industry benchmark uses 10 related companies, 7 same-industry peers, 3 benchmark dimensions, and 4 peer evidence types from the AeroLeads related-company graph.
Top peer industry
Law Practice
70% of 10 related peer industry signals.
Peer benchmark evidence
Multi-signal peer benchmark evidence
Peer benchmark combines 10 related companies with peer graph strength, size benchmark, and size position. Underlying peer graph includes 4 evidence types: industry context, employee benchmarks, website records, social profiles.
Size position
Smaller than most related peers
7 of 10 related employee-estimated peers are higher.
Peer graph strength
Benchmark-ready peer graph
Related peer graph has industry context, employee benchmarks, website records, and social profiles across 10 related companies.
Benchmark dimensions: peer graph strength, size benchmark, and size position.
Categories
Law Practice
Specialties
Immigration Law Corporate Immigration Law Refugee Law immigration
Product-market keyword evidence
Description-backed market keywords
Keyword evidence comes from 3 source field groups: Category, Specialty, Description.
Product-market keyword evidence tier: High-confidence product-market keyword evidence. Product-market keyword evidence combines 11 unique market keywords, 3 source field groups, and 6 description-backed keywords (1 category, 4 specialty, and 6 description).
Law Practice · Category Immigration Law · Specialty Corporate Immigration Law · Specialty Refugee Law · Specialty immigration · Specialty long mangalji llp · Description boutique immigration · Description offering tailored solutions · Description specific needs · Description creative out · Description box thinking follow · Description
Related peer industries
Peer-industry evidence tier: High-confidence peer-industry evidence. Peer-industry evidence combines 10 related companies, 2 peer-industry clusters, and top peer industry Law Practice at 70.0%.
Law Practice 7 peers
70.0% of related peer industries
Legal Services 3 peers
30.0% of related peer industries

Company signals

Company signal breadth
Multi-signal company record
Company-level signals include social audience, company maturity, ownership, and funding.
Multi-signal company record evidence: Company record evidence combines 4 source-backed company signal types: social audience, company maturity, ownership, and funding.
Social audience
856
Followers in the company source record.
Social audience evidence tier: Limited social-audience evidence. Social audience evidence uses 856 followers from source field social_followers.
Audience density
Moderate audience density
856 followers against 11 employee estimate, about 77.80 followers per estimated employee.
Audience-density evidence tier: Limited audience-density evidence. Audience-density evidence combines 856 social followers, 11 employee estimate, and 77.80 followers per estimated employee.
Company maturity
Scaling company history
Company source record includes founding year 2007, about 19 years before 2026.
Company maturity evidence tier: Founding-year maturity evidence. Maturity evidence combines founding year 2007, 19 years of company history, and source field founded.
Company ownership
Private company record
Company source record includes source type Privately Held.
Company ownership evidence tier: Structured ownership evidence. Ownership evidence combines source type Privately Held from structured company source fields.
Funding
Funding data
Funding evidence tier: Limited funding evidence. Funding evidence combines 1 named investor from structured company source fields.
Named investor signal: Funding data names 1 investor in the company source record.
years of experience.

Workforce seniority mix

Aggregated from 4 classified profile signals.

Largest seniority band
Individual contributor
4 of 4 classified profile signals, 2 with visible contact data, 2 official-domain.
Multi-profile official-domain seniority evidence: 2 seniority-classified profiles across 1 tier include company-domain email signals.
Limited seniority evidence: Seniority graph spans 4 classified profile signals across 1 tier, with reachable evidence for 2 and company-domain evidence for 2.
Individual contributor 4 profiles
100.0% of classified seniority signals, 2 with visible contact data, 2 official-domain

Workforce geography

Aggregated from 3 visible profile location signals.

Workforce geography evidence
Corroborated workforce geography evidence
Workforce geography spans 2 locations across 3 visible profile signals, with reachable evidence across 2 locations and company-domain evidence across 2 locations. Top workforce hub differs from company location.
Distribution signal
Multi-location workforce
Visible profile location signals span 2 locations, led by Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Workforce distribution model
Workforce hub outside company location
The largest visible workforce hub is Toronto, Ontario, Canada, while the company location is Ca.
Corroborated workforce model evidence: Workforce model evidence combines 3 located profile signals, 2 workforce locations, 2 cities, 1 country, top hub Toronto, Ontario, Canada at 66%, company-location alignment, 2 reachable locations, and 2 company-domain locations.
Locations
2
Countries
1
Top hub share
66%
Workforce location footprint
Two-city workforce footprint
Visible profile locations span 2 cities across 1 country, led by Toronto.
Cities
2
Countries
1
Company-location alignment
Top workforce hub differs from company location
The largest visible workforce location is Toronto, Ontario, Canada, while the company location is Ca.
Top workforce hub share: 66.7%
Company-location evidence tier: Workforce-location divergence evidence. Company-location alignment evidence combines company location Ca, top workforce hub Toronto, Ontario, Canada, 66.7% top workforce hub share, and location difference.
Contactable location spread
Multi-location contact coverage
Visible contact samples span 2 workforce locations, led by Greater Toronto Area, Canada.
Contactable location evidence tier: Multi-location contactable evidence. Contactable location evidence combines 2 contactable profile location signals, 2 workforce locations, top contactable hub Greater Toronto Area, Canada at 50.0%, and company-location alignment.
Contactable workforce hub differs from company location: The largest contactable workforce location is Greater Toronto Area, Canada, while the company location is Ca. Top contactable hub share: 50.0%.
Greater Toronto Area, Canada 1 contact
50.0% of contactable location signals
Toronto, Ontario, Canada 1 contact
50.0% of contactable location signals
Official-domain location spread
Multi-location official-domain workforce
Company-domain email profile locations span 2 workforce locations, led by Greater Toronto Area, Canada.
2 profiles with lmlawgroup.com email evidence include location signals.
Official-domain location evidence tier: Multi-location official-domain evidence. Official-domain location evidence combines 2 official-domain profile location signals, 2 workforce locations, top official-domain hub Greater Toronto Area, Canada at 50.0%, and company-location alignment.
Official-domain workforce hub differs from company location: The largest company-domain email workforce location is Greater Toronto Area, Canada, while the company location is Ca. Top official-domain hub share: 50.0%.
Greater Toronto Area, Canada 1 profile
50.0% of official-domain location signals
Toronto, Ontario, Canada 1 profile
50.0% of official-domain location signals
Toronto, Ontario, Canada 2 profiles
66.7% of visible location signals
Greater Toronto Area, Canada 1 profile
33.3% of visible location signals

Role and function mix

4 visible titled profiles across 4 distinct role titles.

Title mix
Diverse role title sample
4 distinct role titles across 4 visible titled profiles.
Role-title evidence tier: Diverse role-title evidence. Role-title diversity evidence combines 4 visible titled profiles, 4 distinct role titles, and top title Admin at Long Mangalji Llp at 25.0%.
Contactable role coverage
Mixed contactable role coverage
2 reachable role titles, led by Canadian Immigration Lawyer at 50.0% of contactable titled profiles.
Contactable role evidence tier: Corroborated contactable role evidence. Contactable role evidence combines 2 contactable titled profiles, 2 reachable role titles, and top reachable role Canadian Immigration Lawyer at 50.0%.
Role title reachability
Partial role-title reachability
2 of 4 distinct visible role titles include email or phone signals.
Role-title reachability evidence tier: Corroborated role-title reachability evidence. Role-title reachability evidence combines 4 visible role titles, 2 reachable titles, 50.0% title reachability, and 2 official-domain titles.
Multi-title official-domain reachability 2 / 4 titles
2 of 4 distinct visible role titles include email signals matching lmlawgroup.com.
Admin at Long Mangalji Llp 1 profile
25.0% of visible titled profiles
Canadian Immigration Lawyer 1 profile
25.0% of visible titled profiles
Founding Partner, Canadian Immigration 1 profile
25.0% of visible titled profiles
Partner at Lm Law Group; Canadian 1 profile
25.0% of visible titled profiles

Contactability signals

Contactability score 50.0%
2 of 4 visible profiles include email or phone signals.
Contact channel mix
Multi-channel contact coverage
Visible profile or company source data includes email and phone channels.
Contact evidence tier
High-confidence contact evidence
2 current or verified professional email signals, and multi-channel contact coverage; raw addresses and numbers are hidden.
Contact data safety
Limited privacy-safe contact intelligence
AeroLeads exposes contact counts, channel mix, freshness, and domain-alignment evidence while hiding raw email addresses and masking phone numbers in public output.
Aggregate signals
2
Channel coverage
Email and phone aggregate coverage
Evidence groups
2
Limited contact-safety evidence: Contact-safety evidence combines visible profile contact sample and current email metadata; public schema uses aggregate variables only.
Aggregate-only contact schema: Dataset variables use counts, rates, channel labels, freshness bands, and domain-alignment metrics instead of raw contact values.
Email usability mix
Current email coverage sample
AeroLeads source data includes 4 unique visible email signals; 2 are marked current or verified and 2 are professional-type. Raw addresses are hidden.
Email usability evidence tier: Corroborated email usability evidence. Email usability evidence combines 4 unique email signals, 2 current or verified, 2 professional-type, and 50.0% current signal rate; raw addresses are hidden.
2 current or verified 2 professional-type 50.0% current signal rate
Visible people
4
With contact data
2
Email coverage
2
50.0% of visible profiles
Phone coverage
1
25.0% of visible profiles

Email domain intelligence

2 of 4 visible email signals match lmlawgroup.com.

Mixed-domain coverage: Visible email signals include official-domain and non-official domains.
Email identity evidence tier: Corroborated email identity evidence. Email identity evidence combines 4 visible email signals, 2 matching lmlawgroup.com, 2 people with official-domain email, 50.0% official-domain match, and 2 personal-domain signals.
50.0% domain match 2 people with official-domain email 2 non-official email signals

Explore related pages

Related company intelligence:

Long Mangalji LLP is a boutique immigration law firm with expertise in all aspects of immigration and refugee law. We are committed to offering tailored solutions that meet the specific needs of our clients through the utilization of creative out-of-the-box thinking. Follow us on Twitter & Facebook - @LongMangalji

Company source details

Employees
11
Founded
2007
Address
Ca
Industry
Law Practice
NAICS
Offices of Lawyers
Website
www.lmlawgroup.com
Keywords
Immigration Law, Corporate Immigration Law, Refugee Law, immigration.
HQ
Toronto, Ontario
Related companies
Fragomen, Green and Spiegel, Pallett Valo LLP, Mamann Sandaluk LLP, Sutherland Law, Gosai Law, Bellissimo Immigration Law Group PC, Matkowsky Immigration Law, AKM Law, Jain Immigration Law.
Explore visible people signals for LM Law Group by role, title, or keyword.

2 of 4 visible profiles include email or phone signals in AeroLeads.

LM Law Group Questions

LM Law Group people graph sample