Matthew Good Foundation
Company intelligence Management

Matthew Good Foundation Company Intelligence, Employees & Contact Signals

Contact coverage
Email-led
Visible profile or company source data is strongest for email outreach. 1 visible profile includes direct contact evidence.
People graph depth
1 signals
Moderate profile graph across 1 mapped department.
Account research
6 steps
Account research checklist combines best covered outreach path, buying-committee coverage, ICP fit, related-company graph, domain trust, and people graph depth; raw contact values are hidden.
Outreach path
Marketing + Manager
Coverage combines 1 visible Marketing contact signal and 1 contactable Manager decision-maker signal.
Evidence quality 100/100 Priority intelligence record

AeroLeads company intelligence

Matthew Good Foundation workforce and contactability signals

Evidence from AeroLeads company records, matched professional profiles, and related company graph.

High confidence
Intelligence completeness
Strong intelligence record
8 of 11 major intelligence groups are available for this company.
Largest mapped team
Marketing
1 profile signals in Marketing.
Departments mapped
1
Workforce composition from AeroLeads profile data.
Profile graph
Moderate profile graph
1 mapped workforce signals against a 5 employee size estimate.
Top reachable team
Marketing
1 visible contact signal.
Top seniority band
Manager
2 of 3 classified profile signals.
Visible contact sample
1
Displayed people with email or phone data.

Profile graph researchability

Visible people graph includes 3 visible people: 3 named, 3 titled, 2 located, and 1 contactable.

Profile research sample
Profile coverage evidence tier: Moderate profile coverage evidence. Profile coverage evidence combines 1 mapped workforce signal, 5 employee size estimate, and 20.0% profile graph coverage.
Corroborated profile graph evidence: Researchability is based on 3 visible people with 4 populated evidence dimensions: named, titled, located, and contactable signals.
Profile association confidence: Profile association sample. Association confidence combines 3 titled profiles and 1 contactable profile.
People
3
Named
3
Titled
3
Located
2
Contactable
1

Data methodology

AeroLeads renders only source-backed fields for this company page.

5 source groups
Company record Matched profile graph Email-pattern aggregate Related company graph Company signal fields
Blank source fields are omitted
Related companies are ordered deterministically
Structured data uses aggregate counts only

Intelligence completeness

8 of 11 major intelligence groups are available for this company.

8 / 11 groups
Strong intelligence record 72.7%
Workforce composition Contactability Email intelligence Decision makers Buying committee Domain confidence Market and peer context Company momentum

Evidence quality

This page clears the 60+ AeroLeads company-intelligence evidence threshold.

100 / 100
Priority intelligence record Threshold 60+
Workforce composition Employee email coverage Department contactability Decision-maker coverage Related company graph Peer graph strength
Workforce graph
16 signals
Workforce composition, Department contactability, Profile graph researchability
Contactability
4 signals
Employee email coverage, Contact channel mix, Contact data safety guardrail
Decision-maker intelligence
9 signals
Decision-maker coverage, Leadership signals, Department leadership coverage
Market and peer context
15 signals
Related company graph, Peer graph strength, Peer position benchmark
Company momentum
4 signals
Company signal breadth, Company momentum, Company momentum score
Source trust
11 signals
Domain confidence, Intelligence completeness, Company description
53 additional source-backed evidence signals are counted in this page quality score.

Prospecting readiness

Matthew Good Foundation shows strong prospecting fit based on person-level contact coverage, best covered outreach path, decision-maker coverage, and company momentum.

85 / 100
Strong prospecting fit High-confidence prospecting evidence

Prospecting evidence combines person-level contact coverage, best covered outreach path, decision-maker coverage, company momentum, and people graph depth; raw contact values are hidden.

ICP fit
Qualified ICP fit

ICP fit combines company size, market specificity, contactability, buying committee, and company momentum; raw contact values are hidden.

73 / 100
Company size
5 employees
Employee estimate is available for ICP filtering.
Market specificity
Focused market profile
14 market classification signals across categories, specialties, and related peer industries.
Reachability
Mapped contact-channel evidence
Visible profile or company source data is strongest for email outreach.
Buying committee
Mapped buying committee
Mapped decision-maker signals span 1 business function.
Momentum
Single momentum signal
Momentum evidence combines high audience density.
Account research checklist
Multi-step account research checklist

Account research checklist combines best covered outreach path, buying-committee coverage, ICP fit, related-company graph, domain trust, and people graph depth; raw contact values are hidden.

6 steps
Confirm contact path
Marketing + Manager
Outreach path evidence combines 1 visible Marketing contact signal and 1 contactable Manager decision-maker signal; raw contacts are hidden.
Map reachable buying committee
Mapped buying committee
Buying-committee evidence combines 1 mapped buying-committee function, 1 contactable function, and Marketing / growth function coverage.
Validate ICP fit
Qualified ICP fit
ICP fit combines company size, market specificity, contactability, buying committee, and company momentum; raw contact values are hidden.
Compare related peers
Limited peer comparison
Compares this company with related-company evidence across employee scale and peer graph evidence.
Check domain trust
Mixed domain alignment
Domain evidence combines website domain and social profile; raw email addresses are hidden.
Review people graph depth
Moderate profile graph
1 mapped workforce signals against a 5 employee size estimate.
Contact coverage
Mapped contact-channel evidence
Visible profile or company source data is strongest for email outreach.
Best outreach path
Marketing + Manager
Coverage combines 1 visible Marketing contact signal and 1 contactable Manager decision-maker signal.
Decision-maker coverage
Mapped buying committee
Mapped decision-maker signals span 1 business function.
Company momentum
Single momentum signal
Momentum evidence combines high audience density.

Domain trust signals

Domain confidence for matthewgoodfoundation.org is based on website domain and social profile.

35 / 100
Mixed domain alignment Limited domain evidence

Domain evidence combines website domain and social profile; raw email addresses are hidden.

Website domain
matthewgoodfoundation.org
The official website domain is available from the company source record.
Social profile
LinkedIn organization page
A LinkedIn organization page is present for this company record.
Employee email mismatch: Visible employee email signals do not match the official domain.

AeroLeads coverage snapshot

Profile sample
3
Visible people attached to this company page.
Profile graph depth
Moderate profile graph
1 mapped workforce signals against a 5 employee size estimate.
Contactable sample
1
Visible people with email or phone data.
Contact channel mix
Email-led contact coverage
Visible profile or company source data is strongest for email outreach.
Contact evidence confidence
Mapped contact-channel evidence
Visible profile or company source data is strongest for email outreach.
Department coverage
1
Departments represented in AeroLeads workforce signals.
Leadership signals
1
Department lead or leadership signals in the org data.
Department leader sample
Limited department leader sample
AeroLeads source data includes 1 leadership signal across 1 department; rows show titles and contact-channel presence only.
Department leadership coverage
Focused department leadership coverage
Leadership signals appear in 1 of 1 mapped departments.
Leadership density
100
Percent of mapped department signals that are leadership signals.
Department contact coverage
1
Departments with visible contact samples.
Department contact spread
Focused department contact spread
Visible contact samples appear in 1 of 1 mapped departments.
Email domain confidence
Non-official email coverage
Visible email signals use non-official domains only.
Domain confidence
Mixed domain alignment
Domain confidence for matthewgoodfoundation.org is based on website domain and social profile.
Contact data safety
Limited privacy-safe contact intelligence
AeroLeads exposes contact counts, channel mix, freshness, and domain-alignment evidence while hiding raw email addresses and masking phone numbers in public output.
Company signal breadth
Multi-signal company record
Company-level signals include social audience, company maturity, ownership, and affiliated pages.
Company momentum score
Limited company momentum score
Momentum score blends partial contactability and peer position from AeroLeads company and profile evidence.
Company ownership signal
Nonprofit organization record
Company source record includes source type Nonprofit.
Audience density
High audience density
824 followers against 5 employee estimate, about 164.80 followers per estimated employee.
Specialty signals
8
Specialty tags in the company record.
Market specificity
Focused market profile
14 market classification signals across categories, specialties, and related peer industries.
Peer industry clusters
8
Industries represented by related company records.
Related companies
10
Company graph links available for comparison.
Industry benchmark
Evidence-backed industry benchmark
Industry benchmark uses 10 related companies, 1 same-industry peer, 3 benchmark dimensions, and 4 peer evidence types from the AeroLeads related-company graph.
Peer benchmark confidence
Multi-signal peer benchmark evidence
Peer benchmark combines 10 related companies with peer graph strength, size benchmark, and size position. Underlying peer graph includes 4 evidence types: industry context, employee benchmarks, website records, social profiles.
Peer position benchmark
Employee-scale peer position benchmark
Peer-position benchmark shows employee scale above 25% of 8 comparable related peers.
Peer comparison matrix
Limited peer comparison
Compares this company with related-company evidence across employee scale and peer graph evidence.
Workforce locations
2
Locations represented in visible profile signals.
Workforce distribution
Multi-location workforce
Visible profile location signals span 2 locations, led by Bristol, England, United Kingdom.
Workforce location footprint
Two-city workforce footprint
Visible profile locations span 2 cities across 1 country, led by Bristol.
Workforce geography evidence confidence
Multi-location workforce geography evidence
Workforce geography spans 2 locations across 2 visible profile signals. Top workforce hub differs from company location.
Workforce seniority tiers
2
Seniority bands derived from visible profile titles and levels.
Seniority evidence confidence
Corroborated seniority evidence
Seniority graph spans 3 classified profile signals across 2 tiers, with reachable evidence for 1. Leadership-heavy visible sample.
Classified seniority profiles
3
Visible profiles with usable seniority signals.
Management-to-IC proxy
Leadership-heavy visible sample
3 managerial seniority signals appear in the visible seniority-classified sample; contributor signals are not visible.
Role title diversity
Diverse role title sample
3 distinct role titles across 3 visible titled profiles.
Visible role titles
3
Distinct role titles found in visible profile signals.
Decision-maker signals
3
Visible profiles matching seniority or leadership title patterns.
Decision-maker reachability
Partial decision-maker reachability
Some mapped decision-maker signals include visible contact data.
Buying committee evidence confidence
Mapped buying committee
Mapped decision-maker signals span 1 business function.
Buyer persona availability
Single-persona buyer availability
Mapped decision-maker evidence covers Marketing buyer; 1 of 1 buyer persona include visible contact data.
Decision-maker contactability rate
33.30
Percent of mapped decision-maker signals with visible contact data.
Best covered outreach path
Marketing + Manager
Coverage combines 1 visible Marketing contact signal and 1 contactable Manager decision-maker signal.
Prospecting fit
Strong prospecting fit
Matthew Good Foundation shows strong prospecting fit based on person-level contact coverage, best covered outreach path, decision-maker coverage, and company momentum.
ICP fit
Qualified ICP fit
Matthew Good Foundation matches the qualified ICP fit band for common outbound filters based on company size, market specificity, contactability, buying committee, and company momentum.
Account research checklist
Multi-step account research checklist
Account research checklist combines best covered outreach path, buying-committee coverage, ICP fit, related-company graph, domain trust, and people graph depth; raw contact values are hidden.
Intelligence signal groups
16
AeroLeads signal groups available for this company.

Market focus signals

Primary industry
Non-profit Organizations
Market specificity
Focused market profile
14 market classification signals across categories, specialties, and related peer industries.
Market evidence tier
High-confidence market evidence
Market evidence combines 14 classification signals from categories, specialties, related peer industries, and description keywords. 6 description-backed keyword signals are included.
Industry benchmark
Evidence-backed industry benchmark
Industry benchmark uses 10 related companies, 1 same-industry peer, 3 benchmark dimensions, and 4 peer evidence types from the AeroLeads related-company graph.
Top peer industry
Business Consulting and Services
22% of 10 related peer industry signals.
Peer benchmark evidence
Multi-signal peer benchmark evidence
Peer benchmark combines 10 related companies with peer graph strength, size benchmark, and size position. Underlying peer graph includes 4 evidence types: industry context, employee benchmarks, website records, social profiles.
Size position
Smaller than most related peers
6 of 8 related employee-estimated peers are higher.
Peer graph strength
Benchmark-ready peer graph
Related peer graph has industry context, employee benchmarks, website records, and social profiles across 10 related companies.
Benchmark dimensions: peer graph strength, size benchmark, and size position.
Categories
Non-profit Organizations
Specialties
Employee Giving Volunteering Social Impact Grant making Grassroots Projects Charity Community Interest Companies Social Enterprise
Product-market keyword evidence
Description-backed market keywords
Keyword evidence comes from 3 source field groups: Category, Specialty, Description.
Product-market keyword evidence tier: High-confidence product-market keyword evidence. Product-market keyword evidence combines 15 unique market keywords, 3 source field groups, and 6 description-backed keywords (1 category, 8 specialty, and 6 description).
Non-profit Organizations · Category Employee Giving · Specialty Volunteering · Specialty Social Impact · Specialty Grant making · Specialty Grassroots Projects · Specialty Charity · Specialty Community Interest Companies · Specialty Social Enterprise · Specialty both sixth generation · Description would donate · Description could apply · Description
Related peer industries
Peer-industry evidence tier: High-confidence peer-industry evidence. Peer-industry evidence combines 9 related companies, 5 peer-industry clusters, and top peer industry Business Consulting and Services at 22.2%.
Business Consulting and Services 2 peers
22.2% of related peer industries
Venture Capital and Private Equity Principals 1 peer
11.1% of related peer industries
Travel Arrangements 1 peer
11.1% of related peer industries
Individual and Family Services 1 peer
11.1% of related peer industries
Transportation, Logistics, Supply Chain and Storage 1 peer
11.1% of related peer industries

Company signals

Company signal breadth
Multi-signal company record
Company-level signals include social audience, company maturity, ownership, and affiliated pages.
Multi-signal company record evidence: Company record evidence combines 4 source-backed company signal types: social audience, company maturity, ownership, and affiliated pages.
Social audience
824
Followers in the company source record.
Social audience evidence tier: Limited social-audience evidence. Social audience evidence uses 824 followers from source field social_followers.
Audience density
High audience density
824 followers against 5 employee estimate, about 164.80 followers per estimated employee.
Audience-density evidence tier: Limited audience-density evidence. Audience-density evidence combines 824 social followers, 5 employee estimate, and 164.80 followers per estimated employee.
Company maturity
Scaling company history
Company source record includes founding year 2011, about 15 years before 2026.
Company maturity evidence tier: Founding-year maturity evidence. Maturity evidence combines founding year 2011, 15 years of company history, and source field founded.
Company ownership
Nonprofit organization record
Company source record includes source type Nonprofit.
Company ownership evidence tier: Structured ownership evidence. Ownership evidence combines source type Nonprofit from structured company source fields.
Company momentum
Single momentum signal
Momentum evidence combines high audience density.
Momentum score: 14 / 100
Limited company momentum score. Momentum score blends partial contactability and peer position from AeroLeads company and profile evidence.
Limited momentum score evidence: Momentum score evidence combines partial contactability and peer position; raw contact values are hidden.
Partial contactability · 6 Peer position · 8
Affiliated pages
1
Affiliate evidence tier: Limited affiliate evidence. Affiliate evidence combines 1 affiliated page and 1 distinct industry from structured affiliated-page source records.
John Good Group | Growing Businesses Together · Business Consulting and Services

Workforce composition

Department leadership coverage
Focused department leadership coverage
Leadership signals appear in 1 of 1 mapped departments. Leadership signals represent 100.0% of mapped department signals.
Department leadership evidence tier: Limited department leadership evidence. Department leadership evidence combines 1 leadership signal, 1 of 1 mapped departments, and 100.0% leadership density.
1 leadership signals 1 departments with visible contacts
Department leader sample
Limited department leader sample
1 contactable

AeroLeads source data includes 1 leadership signal across 1 department; rows show titles and contact-channel presence only.

Department leader evidence tier: Limited department leader evidence. Department leader evidence combines 1 leadership signal, 1 department, and 1 contactable; raw contacts are hidden.
Leader Department Seniority Channel
Jennifer Murden
Communications and Impact Manager - Matthew Good Foundation
 Marketing Manager Email
Marketing 1 signals
100.0% of mapped department signals, 1 leadership signals, 1 visible contact

Workforce seniority mix

Aggregated from 3 classified profile signals.

Largest seniority band
Manager
2 of 3 classified profile signals, 1 with visible contact data.
Corroborated seniority evidence: Seniority graph spans 3 classified profile signals across 2 tiers, with reachable evidence for 1. Leadership-heavy visible sample.
Management-to-IC proxy
Leadership-heavy visible sample
100.0%
managerial seniority signals
0.0%
contributor seniority signals
3 managerial seniority signals appear in the visible seniority-classified sample; contributor signals are not visible.
Management-shape evidence tier: Leadership-heavy management-shape evidence. Management-shape evidence combines 3 seniority-classified signals, 3 managerial signals, 100.0% managerial share, and 0 contributor signals.
Manager 2 profiles
66.7% of classified seniority signals, 1 with visible contact data
Director 1 profile
33.3% of classified seniority signals

Workforce geography

Aggregated from 2 visible profile location signals.

Workforce geography evidence
Multi-location workforce geography evidence
Workforce geography spans 2 locations across 2 visible profile signals. Top workforce hub differs from company location.
Distribution signal
Multi-location workforce
Visible profile location signals span 2 locations, led by Bristol, England, United Kingdom.
Workforce location footprint
Two-city workforce footprint
Visible profile locations span 2 cities across 1 country, led by Bristol.
Cities
2
Countries
1
Company-location alignment
Top workforce hub differs from company location
The largest visible workforce location is Bristol, England, United Kingdom, while the company location is United Kingdom.
Top workforce hub share: 50.0%
Company-location evidence tier: Workforce-location divergence evidence. Company-location alignment evidence combines company location United Kingdom, top workforce hub Bristol, England, United Kingdom, 50.0% top workforce hub share, and location difference.
Bristol, England, United Kingdom 1 profile
50.0% of visible location signals
Kingston Upon Hull, England Metropolitan Area, United Kingdom 1 profile
50.0% of visible location signals

Decision-maker coverage

3 seniority signals, 1 with visible contact data.

Decision-maker evidence tier
Mapped decision-maker evidence
Decision-maker evidence covers 3 seniority signals, 1 reachable. Buying committee spans 1 function.
Account planning snapshot
Multi-signal account planning snapshot
Snapshot combines department reachability, decision-maker coverage, and buying-committee function aggregates.
4 account-planning evidence cards available.
Account planning evidence tier: Multi-source account planning evidence. Account planning evidence combines 4 aggregate account-planning cards, best covered outreach path, 1 reachable buying-committee function, Manager seniority reachability, and Marketing department contactability; raw contacts are hidden.
Best covered path
Marketing + Manager
Coverage combines 1 visible Marketing contact signal and 1 contactable Manager decision-maker signal.
Reachable buying committee
1 of 1 functions
Reachable functions include Marketing / growth.
Most reachable seniority
Manager
1 of 2 signals in this seniority band include visible contact data.
Top reachable team
Marketing
1 visible contact signal in this department sample.
Partial decision-maker reachability 33.3%
Some mapped decision-maker signals include visible contact data.
Decision-maker reachability evidence tier: Partial decision-maker reachability evidence. Decision-maker reachability evidence combines 1 contactable decision-maker signal, 3 mapped decision-maker signals, and 33.3% contactability.
Email-led decision-maker coverage: Mapped decision-maker contact data is strongest for email, with 1 email signals.
Buying committee function coverage
Single-function buying-committee coverage
1 of 1 mapped functions include visible decision-maker contact data.
Mapped buying committee: Mapped decision-maker signals span 1 business function.
Buying committee evidence tier: Mapped buying-committee evidence. Buying-committee evidence combines 1 mapped buying-committee function, 1 contactable function, and Marketing / growth function coverage.
Buyer persona availability: Single-persona buyer availability. Mapped decision-maker evidence covers Marketing buyer; 1 of 1 buyer persona include visible contact data. Reachable buyer persona evidence: Buyer persona evidence combines 1 mapped buyer persona, 1 contactable persona, and Marketing buyer coverage.
Marketing / growth: 1 contactable
Most reachable seniority
Manager
1 of 2 seniority signals include visible contact data.
Seniority reachability evidence tier: Mapped seniority reachability evidence. Seniority reachability evidence combines 1 contactable Manager signal, 2 Manager signals, 50.0% tier contactability, and email coverage.
Manager 2 profiles
66.7% of mapped seniority signals, 1 with visible contact data
Director 1 profile
33.3% of mapped seniority signals

Role and function mix

3 visible titled profiles across 3 distinct role titles.

Title mix
Diverse role title sample
3 distinct role titles across 3 visible titled profiles.
Role-title evidence tier: Diverse role-title evidence. Role-title diversity evidence combines 3 visible titled profiles, 3 distinct role titles, and top title Communications and Impact Manager at 33.3%.
Communications and Impact Manager 1 profile
33.3% of visible titled profiles
Technical Director at Padlocks.co.uk 1 profile
33.3% of visible titled profiles
Trusts and Foundations Manager 1 profile
33.3% of visible titled profiles

Contactability signals

Contactability score 33.3%
1 of 3 visible profiles include email or phone signals.
Contact channel mix
Email-led contact coverage
Visible profile or company source data is strongest for email outreach.
Contact evidence tier
Mapped contact-channel evidence
Visible profile or company source data is strongest for email outreach.
Contact data safety
Limited privacy-safe contact intelligence
AeroLeads exposes contact counts, channel mix, freshness, and domain-alignment evidence while hiding raw email addresses and masking phone numbers in public output.
Aggregate signals
1
Channel coverage
Email aggregate coverage
Evidence groups
1
Limited contact-safety evidence: Contact-safety evidence combines visible profile contact sample; public schema uses aggregate variables only.
Aggregate-only contact schema: Dataset variables use counts, rates, channel labels, freshness bands, and domain-alignment metrics instead of raw contact values.
Best covered outreach path
Marketing + Manager
Coverage combines 1 visible Marketing contact signal and 1 contactable Manager decision-maker signal.
Outreach path evidence tier: Limited outreach path evidence. Outreach path evidence combines 1 visible Marketing contact signal and 1 contactable Manager decision-maker signal; raw contacts are hidden.
Visible people
3
With contact data
1
Email coverage
1
33.3% of visible profiles

Email domain intelligence

0 of 2 visible email signals match matthewgoodfoundation.org.

Non-official email coverage: Visible email signals use non-official domains only.
Email identity evidence tier: Non-official email identity evidence. Email identity evidence combines 2 visible email signals, 1 other-domain signal, and 1 personal-domain signal.
0.0% domain match 0 people with official-domain email 2 non-official email signals

Department contact samples

Focused department contact spread: Visible contact samples appear in 1 of 1 mapped departments.
Department contactability evidence tier: Limited department contactability evidence. Department contactability evidence combines 1 visible contact sample, 1 of 1 mapped department, and 1 email signal; raw contacts are hidden.
Department Contacts Email Official email Phone
Marketing 1 1 0 0

Explore related pages

Matthew Good Foundation management graph and contactability signals

Related company intelligence:

The Matthew Good Foundation was the idea of Tim Good and Matthew Good, both sixth generation custodians of the Good family business – John Good Group. Passionate about the business being a force for good, Tim and Matthew agreed that every year the family business would donate a proportion of profits to the Foundation, so that employees could apply for funds to support the charities they care about. Tragically, while creating the Foundation, Matthew passed away suddenly while taking part in the Humber Half Marathon while raising money for charity. In a tribute to Matthew, the Foundation was launched in his memory. Our first project funded research and promoted safety and best practice in race medicine and the treatment of illnesses commonly found during marathons and other similar events. Today, we work worth with a range of businesses, stakeholders and individuals and partner them with small, innovative charities to deliver positive social impact. Our experience of working closely with small charitable organisations has highlighted that despite making a significant impact on the world around them, there is a funding gap that can be difficult for them to bridge as they take their next steps to growth. We partner with businesses who have a genuine desire to make a difference to people, planet, and their communities. Our tailored charitable giving programmes accommodate different needs and budgets, and we tailor all our packages to deliver our partners' unique charitable objectives.

Company source details

Employees
5
Founded
2011
Address
United Kingdom
Industry
Non-Profit Organizations
Website
matthewgoodfoundation.org
Keywords
Employee Giving, Volunteering, Social Impact, Grant making, Grassroots Projects, Charity, Community Interest Companies, Social Enterprise.
HQ
Hessle, East Riding of Yorkshire
Related companies
500 Global, John Good Group | Growing Businesses Together, Good Travel Management | Your Human-Led Corporate Travel Team, UNWTO, Sailors' Children's Society, DAN Shipping & Chartering | Connecting Sea And Shore, Will Garvey Trust Foundation, Aisha Riaz - The LinkedIn Creator, Changemethod, Race Ready App.
Explore visible people signals for Matthew Good Foundation by role, title, or keyword.

1 of 3 visible profiles include email or phone signals in AeroLeads.

Matthew Good Foundation Questions

Matthew Good Foundation people graph sample