Maude Legal Limited

Maude Legal Limited Intelligence, Employees & Contact Signals

Contact coverage
Email-led
Visible profile or company source data is strongest for email outreach. 1 visible profile includes direct contact evidence.
People graph depth
3 signals
Moderate profile graph across 2 mapped departments.
Account research
6 steps
Account research checklist combines person-level contact coverage, buying-committee coverage, ICP fit, related-company graph, domain trust, and people graph depth; raw contact values are hidden.
Social audience
39
Audience size from company social follower data.
Evidence quality 100/100 Priority intelligence record

AeroLeads company intelligence

Maude Legal Limited workforce and contactability signals

Evidence from AeroLeads company records, matched professional profiles, and related company graph.

High confidence
Intelligence completeness
Strong intelligence record
7 of 11 major intelligence groups are available for this company.
Largest mapped team
Legal
2 profile signals in Legal.
Departments mapped
2
Workforce composition from AeroLeads profile data.
Profile graph
Moderate profile graph
3 mapped workforce signals against a 14 employee size estimate.
Top reachable team
General
1 visible contact signal.
Top seniority band
Individual contributor
3 of 5 classified profile signals.
Visible contact sample
1
Displayed people with email or phone data.

Profile graph researchability

Visible people graph includes 5 visible people: 5 named, 5 titled, 3 located, and 1 contactable.

Multi-signal profile graph
Profile coverage evidence tier: Moderate profile coverage evidence. Profile coverage evidence combines 3 mapped workforce signals, 14 employee size estimate, and 21.4% profile graph coverage.
Corroborated profile graph evidence: Researchability is based on 5 visible people with 4 populated evidence dimensions: named, titled, located, and contactable signals.
Profile association confidence: Profile association sample. Association confidence combines 5 titled profiles and 1 contactable profile.
People
5
Named
5
Titled
5
Located
3
Contactable
1

Data methodology

AeroLeads renders only source-backed fields for this company page.

5 source groups
Company record Matched profile graph Email-pattern aggregate Related company graph Company signal fields
Blank source fields are omitted
Related companies are ordered deterministically
Structured data uses aggregate counts only

Intelligence completeness

7 of 11 major intelligence groups are available for this company.

7 / 11 groups
Strong intelligence record 63.6%
Workforce composition Contactability Email intelligence Decision makers Buying committee Domain confidence Market and peer context

Evidence quality

This page clears the 60+ AeroLeads company-intelligence evidence threshold.

100 / 100
Priority intelligence record Threshold 60+
Workforce composition Employee email coverage Department contactability Department seniority map Decision-maker coverage Email pattern intelligence
Workforce graph
16 signals
Workforce composition, Department contactability, Department seniority map
Contactability
5 signals
Employee email coverage, Email pattern intelligence, Contact channel mix
Decision-maker intelligence
3 signals
Decision-maker coverage, Buying committee coverage, Account research checklist
Market and peer context
14 signals
Related company graph, Peer graph strength, Peer position benchmark
Company momentum
3 signals
Company signal breadth, Company momentum score, Company ownership signal
Source trust
9 signals
Domain confidence, Intelligence completeness, Company description
44 additional source-backed evidence signals are counted in this page quality score.

Prospecting readiness

Maude Legal Limited shows actionable prospecting fit based on person-level contact coverage, decision-maker coverage, people graph depth, and peer context.

55 / 100
Actionable prospecting fit Corroborated prospecting evidence

Prospecting evidence combines person-level contact coverage, decision-maker coverage, people graph depth, and peer context; raw contact values are hidden.

ICP fit
Qualified ICP fit

ICP fit combines company size, market specificity, contactability, and buying committee; raw contact values are hidden.

65 / 100
Company size
14 employees
Employee estimate is in a common outbound prospecting range.
Market specificity
Focused market profile
11 market classification signals across categories, specialties, and related peer industries.
Reachability
Mapped contact-channel evidence
Visible profile or company source data is strongest for email outreach.
Buying committee
Mapped buying committee
Mapped decision-maker signals span 1 business function.
Account research checklist
Multi-step account research checklist

Account research checklist combines person-level contact coverage, buying-committee coverage, ICP fit, related-company graph, domain trust, and people graph depth; raw contact values are hidden.

6 steps
Confirm contact coverage
Mapped contact-channel evidence
Visible profile or company source data is strongest for email outreach.
Map reachable buying committee
Mapped buying committee
Buying-committee evidence combines 1 mapped buying-committee function and Legal / compliance function coverage.
Validate ICP fit
Qualified ICP fit
ICP fit combines company size, market specificity, contactability, and buying committee; raw contact values are hidden.
Compare related peers
Limited peer comparison
Compares this company with related-company evidence across employee scale and peer graph evidence.
Check domain trust
Basic domain identity
Domain evidence combines website domain and social profile; raw email addresses are hidden.
Review people graph depth
Moderate profile graph
3 mapped workforce signals against a 14 employee size estimate.
Contact coverage
Mapped contact-channel evidence
Visible profile or company source data is strongest for email outreach.
Decision-maker coverage
Mapped buying committee
Mapped decision-maker signals span 1 business function.
People graph depth
Moderate profile graph
3 mapped workforce signals against a 14 employee size estimate.
Peer context
Multi-signal peer benchmark evidence
Peer benchmark combines 10 related companies with peer graph strength, size benchmark, and size position. Underlying peer graph includes 4 evidence types: industry context, employee benchmarks, website records, social profiles.

Domain trust signals

Domain confidence for mmiller.co.nz is based on website domain and social profile.

35 / 100
Basic domain identity Limited domain evidence

Domain evidence combines website domain and social profile; raw email addresses are hidden.

Website domain
mmiller.co.nz
The official website domain is available from the company source record.
Social profile
LinkedIn organization page
A LinkedIn organization page is present for this company record.

AeroLeads coverage snapshot

Profile sample
4
Visible people attached to this company page.
Profile graph depth
Moderate profile graph
3 mapped workforce signals against a 14 employee size estimate.
Contactable sample
1
Visible people with email or phone data.
Contact channel mix
Email-led contact coverage
Visible profile or company source data is strongest for email outreach.
Contact evidence confidence
Mapped contact-channel evidence
Visible profile or company source data is strongest for email outreach.
Department coverage
2
Departments represented in AeroLeads workforce signals.
Department concentration
Multi-department workforce
Mapped workforce signals span 2 departments, led by Legal.
Department contact coverage
1
Departments with visible contact samples.
Department contact spread
Focused department contact spread
Visible contact samples appear in 1 of 2 mapped departments.
Department seniority map
Two-department leadership-depth map
Visible department samples map 2 seniority-classified profiles across 2 departments and 1 seniority band.
Email-pattern variants
1
Distinct matched business email patterns.
Domain confidence
Basic domain identity
Domain confidence for mmiller.co.nz is based on website domain and social profile.
Contact data safety
Limited privacy-safe contact intelligence
AeroLeads exposes contact counts, channel mix, freshness, and domain-alignment evidence while hiding raw email addresses and masking phone numbers in public output.
Company signal breadth
Multi-signal company record
Company-level signals include social audience, company maturity, and ownership.
Company momentum score
Limited company momentum score
Momentum score blends partial contactability and peer position from AeroLeads company and profile evidence.
Company ownership signal
Company type signal
Company source record includes source type Partnership.
Audience density
Low audience density
39 followers against 14 employee estimate, about 2.80 followers per estimated employee.
Specialty signals
5
Specialty tags in the company record.
Market specificity
Focused market profile
11 market classification signals across categories, specialties, and related peer industries.
Peer industry clusters
10
Industries represented by related company records.
Related companies
10
Company graph links available for comparison.
Industry benchmark
Evidence-backed industry benchmark
Industry benchmark uses 10 related companies, 1 same-industry peer, 3 benchmark dimensions, and 4 peer evidence types from the AeroLeads related-company graph.
Peer benchmark confidence
Multi-signal peer benchmark evidence
Peer benchmark combines 10 related companies with peer graph strength, size benchmark, and size position. Underlying peer graph includes 4 evidence types: industry context, employee benchmarks, website records, social profiles.
Peer position benchmark
Employee-scale peer position benchmark
Peer-position benchmark shows employee scale above 33.3% of 9 comparable related peers.
Peer comparison matrix
Limited peer comparison
Compares this company with related-company evidence across employee scale and peer graph evidence.
Workforce locations
2
Locations represented in visible profile signals.
Workforce distribution
Multi-location workforce
Visible profile location signals span 2 locations, led by Wellington, New Zealand.
Workforce location footprint
Two-city workforce footprint
Visible profile locations span 2 cities across 1 country, led by Wellington.
Workforce distribution model
Workforce hub outside company location
The largest visible workforce hub is Wellington, New Zealand, while the company location is Level 7, Nz.
Workforce geography evidence confidence
Multi-location workforce geography evidence
Workforce geography spans 2 locations across 3 visible profile signals. Top workforce hub differs from company location.
Workforce seniority tiers
3
Seniority bands derived from visible profile titles and levels.
Seniority evidence confidence
Corroborated seniority evidence
Seniority graph spans 5 classified profile signals across 3 tiers, with reachable evidence for 1. Contributor-heavy visible sample.
Classified seniority profiles
5
Visible profiles with usable seniority signals.
Management-to-IC proxy
Contributor-heavy visible sample
1 managerial seniority signal and 4 contributor signals appear in the visible seniority-classified sample.
Role title diversity
Diverse role title sample
5 distinct role titles across 5 visible titled profiles.
Visible role titles
5
Distinct role titles found in visible profile signals.
Decision-maker signals
2
Visible profiles matching seniority or leadership title patterns.
Decision-maker reachability
No visible decision-maker contact coverage
Mapped decision-maker signals do not include visible contact data.
Buying committee evidence confidence
Mapped buying committee
Mapped decision-maker signals span 1 business function.
Buyer persona availability
Single-persona buyer availability
Mapped decision-maker evidence covers Legal / compliance buyer; 0 of 1 buyer persona include visible contact data.
Prospecting fit
Actionable prospecting fit
Maude Legal Limited shows actionable prospecting fit based on person-level contact coverage, decision-maker coverage, people graph depth, and peer context.
ICP fit
Qualified ICP fit
Maude Legal Limited matches the qualified ICP fit band for common outbound filters based on company size, market specificity, contactability, and buying committee.
Account research checklist
Multi-step account research checklist
Account research checklist combines person-level contact coverage, buying-committee coverage, ICP fit, related-company graph, domain trust, and people graph depth; raw contact values are hidden.
Intelligence signal groups
15
AeroLeads signal groups available for this company.

Market focus signals

Primary industry
Law Practice
Market specificity
Focused market profile
11 market classification signals across categories, specialties, and related peer industries.
Market evidence tier
High-confidence market evidence
Market evidence combines 11 classification signals from categories, specialties, related peer industries, and description keywords. 3 description-backed keyword signals are included.
Industry benchmark
Evidence-backed industry benchmark
Industry benchmark uses 10 related companies, 1 same-industry peer, 3 benchmark dimensions, and 4 peer evidence types from the AeroLeads related-company graph.
Top peer industry
Government Administration
10% of 10 related peer industry signals.
Peer benchmark evidence
Multi-signal peer benchmark evidence
Peer benchmark combines 10 related companies with peer graph strength, size benchmark, and size position. Underlying peer graph includes 4 evidence types: industry context, employee benchmarks, website records, social profiles.
Size position
Smaller than most related peers
6 of 9 related employee-estimated peers are higher.
Peer graph strength
Benchmark-ready peer graph
Related peer graph has industry context, employee benchmarks, website records, and social profiles across 10 related companies.
Benchmark dimensions: peer graph strength, size benchmark, and size position.
Categories
Law Practice
Specialties
Residential Property Law Commercial Property Business Advice Trusts Wills & Estates
Product-market keyword evidence
Description-backed market keywords
Keyword evidence comes from 3 source field groups: Category, Specialty, Description.
Product-market keyword evidence tier: High-confidence product-market keyword evidence. Product-market keyword evidence combines 9 unique market keywords, 3 source field groups, and 3 description-backed keywords (1 category, 5 specialty, and 3 description).
Law Practice · Category Residential Property Law · Specialty Commercial Property · Specialty Business Advice · Specialty Trusts · Specialty Wills & Estates · Specialty law firm · Description residential property · Description law trusts wills · Description
Related peer industries
Peer-industry evidence tier: High-confidence peer-industry evidence. Peer-industry evidence combines 10 related companies, 5 peer-industry clusters, and top peer industry Government Administration at 10.0%.
Government Administration 1 peer
10.0% of related peer industries
Hospitals and Health Care 1 peer
10.0% of related peer industries
Construction Hardware Manufacturing 1 peer
10.0% of related peer industries
Law Practice 1 peer
10.0% of related peer industries
Higher Education 1 peer
10.0% of related peer industries

Company signals

Company signal breadth
Multi-signal company record
Company-level signals include social audience, company maturity, and ownership.
Corroborated company record evidence: Company record evidence combines 3 source-backed company signal types: social audience, company maturity, and ownership.
Social audience
39
Followers in the company source record.
Social audience evidence tier: Limited social-audience evidence. Social audience evidence uses 39 followers from source field social_followers.
Audience density
Low audience density
39 followers against 14 employee estimate, about 2.80 followers per estimated employee.
Audience-density evidence tier: Limited audience-density evidence. Audience-density evidence combines 39 social followers, 14 employee estimate, and 2.80 followers per estimated employee.
Company maturity
Mature company record
Company source record includes founding year 1991, about 35 years before 2026.
Company maturity evidence tier: Long-running maturity evidence. Maturity evidence combines founding year 1991, 35 years of company history, and source field founded.
Company ownership
Company type signal
Company source record includes source type Partnership.
Company ownership evidence tier: Structured ownership evidence. Ownership evidence combines source type Partnership from structured company source fields.

Workforce composition

Department concentration
Multi-department workforce
Mapped workforce signals span 2 departments, led by Legal. 66.7% of mapped department signals are in the largest department.
Department concentration evidence tier: Multi-department concentration evidence. Department concentration evidence combines 2 mapped departments, top department Legal, and 66.7% top-department share.
Department seniority map
Two-department leadership-depth map
Visible department samples map 2 seniority-classified profiles across 2 departments and 1 seniority band.
Department seniority evidence tier: Limited department seniority evidence. Department seniority evidence combines 2 seniority-classified profiles, 2 departments, 1 seniority band, and top cell General + Individual contributor with 1 profile.
General 1 profile
Individual contributor: 1
Legal 1 profile
Individual contributor: 1
1 departments with visible contacts
Legal 2 signals
66.7% of mapped department signals
General 1 signals
33.3% of mapped department signals, 1 visible contact

Workforce seniority mix

Aggregated from 5 classified profile signals.

Largest seniority band
Individual contributor
3 of 5 classified profile signals, 1 with visible contact data.
Corroborated seniority evidence: Seniority graph spans 5 classified profile signals across 3 tiers, with reachable evidence for 1. Contributor-heavy visible sample.
Management-to-IC proxy
Contributor-heavy visible sample
20.0%
managerial seniority signals
80.0%
contributor seniority signals
1 managerial seniority signal and 4 contributor signals appear in the visible seniority-classified sample.
Management-shape evidence tier: Contributor-heavy management-shape evidence. Management-shape evidence combines 5 seniority-classified signals, 1 managerial signal, 20.0% managerial share, and 4 contributor signals.
Individual contributor 3 profiles
60.0% of classified seniority signals, 1 with visible contact data
Manager 1 profile
20.0% of classified seniority signals
Senior / Lead 1 profile
20.0% of classified seniority signals

Workforce geography

Aggregated from 3 visible profile location signals.

Workforce geography evidence
Multi-location workforce geography evidence
Workforce geography spans 2 locations across 3 visible profile signals. Top workforce hub differs from company location.
Distribution signal
Multi-location workforce
Visible profile location signals span 2 locations, led by Wellington, New Zealand.
Workforce distribution model
Workforce hub outside company location
The largest visible workforce hub is Wellington, New Zealand, while the company location is Level 7, Nz.
Corroborated workforce model evidence: Workforce model evidence combines 3 located profile signals, 2 workforce locations, 2 cities, 1 country, top hub Wellington, New Zealand at 66%, and company-location alignment.
Locations
2
Countries
1
Top hub share
66%
Workforce location footprint
Two-city workforce footprint
Visible profile locations span 2 cities across 1 country, led by Wellington.
Cities
2
Countries
1
Company-location alignment
Top workforce hub differs from company location
The largest visible workforce location is Wellington, New Zealand, while the company location is Level 7, Nz.
Top workforce hub share: 66.7%
Company-location evidence tier: Workforce-location divergence evidence. Company-location alignment evidence combines company location Level 7, Nz, top workforce hub Wellington, New Zealand, 66.7% top workforce hub share, and location difference.
Wellington, New Zealand 2 profiles
66.7% of visible location signals
New Zealand 1 profile
33.3% of visible location signals

Decision-maker coverage

2 seniority signals.

Decision-maker evidence tier
Mapped decision-maker evidence
Decision-maker evidence covers 2 seniority signals. Buying committee spans 1 function.
No visible decision-maker contact coverage
Mapped decision-maker signals do not include visible contact data.
Buying committee function coverage
Single-function buying-committee coverage
0 of 1 mapped functions include visible decision-maker contact data.
Mapped buying committee: Mapped decision-maker signals span 1 business function.
Buying committee evidence tier: Mapped buying-committee evidence. Buying-committee evidence combines 1 mapped buying-committee function and Legal / compliance function coverage.
Buyer persona availability: Single-persona buyer availability. Mapped decision-maker evidence covers Legal / compliance buyer; 0 of 1 buyer persona include visible contact data. Mapped buyer persona evidence: Buyer persona evidence combines 1 mapped buyer persona and Legal / compliance buyer coverage.
Legal / compliance
Manager 1 profile
50.0% of mapped seniority signals
Senior / Lead 1 profile
50.0% of mapped seniority signals

Role and function mix

5 visible titled profiles across 5 distinct role titles.

Title mix
Diverse role title sample
5 distinct role titles across 5 visible titled profiles.
Role-title evidence tier: Diverse role-title evidence. Role-title diversity evidence combines 5 visible titled profiles, 5 distinct role titles, and top title Final Year Llb/ba(international Relations, Political Science) - Law Clerk Maude & Miller at 20.0%.
Final Year Llb/ba(international Relations, Political Science) - Law Clerk Maude & Miller 1 profile
20.0% of visible titled profiles
Lawyer 1 profile
20.0% of visible titled profiles
Partner at Maude & Miller 1 profile
20.0% of visible titled profiles
Practice Manager 1 profile
20.0% of visible titled profiles
Senior Registered Legal Executive 1 profile
20.0% of visible titled profiles

Contactability signals

Contactability score 25.0%
1 of 4 visible profiles include email or phone signals.
Contact channel mix
Email-led contact coverage
Visible profile or company source data is strongest for email outreach.
Contact evidence tier
Mapped contact-channel evidence
Visible profile or company source data is strongest for email outreach.
Contact data safety
Limited privacy-safe contact intelligence
AeroLeads exposes contact counts, channel mix, freshness, and domain-alignment evidence while hiding raw email addresses and masking phone numbers in public output.
Aggregate signals
1
Channel coverage
Email aggregate coverage
Evidence groups
1
Limited contact-safety evidence: Contact-safety evidence combines visible profile contact sample; public schema uses aggregate variables only.
Aggregate-only contact schema: Dataset variables use counts, rates, channel labels, freshness bands, and domain-alignment metrics instead of raw contact values.
Visible people
4
With contact data
1
Email coverage
1
25.0% of visible profiles

Department contact samples

Focused department contact spread: Visible contact samples appear in 1 of 2 mapped departments.
Department contactability evidence tier: Limited department contactability evidence. Department contactability evidence combines 1 visible contact sample, 1 of 2 mapped departments, and 1 email signal; raw contacts are hidden.
Department Contacts Email Official email Phone
General 1 1 0 0
Top email pattern: firstl at 100.0% of matched patterns.
Format example: [first][last_initial]@mmiller.co.nz
Dominant pattern: One email pattern accounts for most matched examples.
Email pattern evidence tier: High-confidence email pattern evidence. Email pattern evidence combines 1 matched pattern, 100.0% top-pattern share, and format example for mmiller.co.nz.
firstl 100.0%

Explore related pages

Maude Legal Limited email format Maude Legal Limited management graph and contactability signals

Related company intelligence:

1 of 4 visible Maude Legal Limited profiles include email or phone signals. Review people graph
The strongest Maude Legal Limited email pattern signal is [first][last_initial] , representing 100.0% of matched email-pattern evidence in the AeroLeads company graph.
In total, AeroLeads has detected 1 aggregate email-pattern signals for Maude Legal Limited. View the detailed email format page .

Maude Legal Limited Email Pattern Intelligence Snapshot

These aggregate patterns support the company intelligence page. The dedicated email-format workflow lives on Maude Legal Limited email format .

Observed pattern
Example pattern
[first][last_initial]
[first][last_initial]@mmiller.co.nz
100%

Maude Legal Limited Questions

Maude Legal Limited people graph sample