What email signal is available for Mediatonic Games?

AeroLeads source data includes a company email signal for Mediatonic Games; raw email addresses are hidden.

What support email signal is available for Mediatonic Games?

AeroLeads source data includes a support email signal for Mediatonic Games; raw email addresses are hidden.

What is Mediatonic Games's official website?

Mediatonic Games's website is http://www.mediatonicgames.com

How much workforce data is available for Mediatonic Games?

AeroLeads maps 29 visible workforce signals for Mediatonic Games. The company source record lists 113 employees. 1 of 4 visible profiles include email or phone signals.

What is Mediatonic Games's industry?

Mediatonic Games's industry is Computer Games

Which related companies are similar to Mediatonic Games?

AeroLeads related company records for Mediatonic Games include Epic Games, Riot Games, Playground Games, Hutch, Team17, Hello Games, Trailmix Games. AeroLeads classifies this as multi-signal peer benchmark evidence across 3 benchmark dimensions. High-confidence peer link set: 10 related companies met the 2-signal peer-link threshold. Eligible peers average 4.0 source-backed signals.

What are Mediatonic Games's categories?

Mediatonic Games's categories are Computer Games

What is Mediatonic Games's location?

Mediatonic Games's location is London, City of, United Kingdom

When was Mediatonic Games founded?

Mediatonic Games's founding year is 2005

What is Mediatonic Games's funding?

Mediatonic Games's funding is 33.0M

What is the best covered outreach path for Mediatonic Games?

Mediatonic Games's best covered outreach path is General + Senior / Lead. Coverage combines 4 visible General contact signals and 3 contactable Senior / Lead decision-maker signals. Corroborated outreach path evidence: Outreach path evidence combines 4 visible General contact signals and 3 contactable Senior / Lead decision-maker signals; raw contacts are hidden.

Which team has the strongest visible contact coverage at Mediatonic Games?

General has the strongest visible contact coverage for Mediatonic Games, with 4 visible contact signals. Broad department contact spread: Visible contact samples appear across 3 of 4 mapped departments. High-confidence department contactability evidence: Department contactability evidence combines 7 visible contact samples, 3 of 4 mapped departments, 7 email signals, and 1 phone signal; raw contacts are hidden.

Company intelligence Management

Mediatonic Games Company Intelligence, Employees & Contact Signals

Contact coverage: Email-led; Visible profile or company source data is strongest for email outreach. 1 visible profile includes direct contact evidence.
People graph depth: 29 signals; Deep profile graph across 4 mapped departments.
Account research: 6 steps; Account research checklist combines best covered outreach path, buying-committee coverage, ICP fit, technology workforce evidence, related-company graph, and domain trust; raw contact values are hidden.
Technology talent: 5; Technology-oriented role signals in the workforce graph.

Evidence quality 100/100 Priority intelligence record

AeroLeads company intelligence

Mediatonic Games workforce and contactability signals

Evidence from AeroLeads company records, matched professional profiles, and related company graph.

High confidence

Intelligence completeness

Complete intelligence record

9 of 11 major intelligence groups are available for this company.

Largest mapped team

5 profile signals in IT.

Departments mapped

Workforce composition from AeroLeads profile data.

Profile graph

Deep profile graph

29 mapped workforce signals against a 113 employee size estimate.

Top reachable team

General

4 visible contact signals.

Top seniority band

Senior / Lead

6 of 13 classified profile signals.

Visible contact sample

Displayed people with email or phone data.

Profile graph researchability

Visible people graph includes 14 visible people: 14 named, 13 titled, 11 located, and 7 contactable.

Multi-signal profile graph

Profile coverage evidence tier: Deep profile coverage evidence. Profile coverage evidence combines 29 mapped workforce signals, 113 employee size estimate, and 25.7% profile graph coverage.

High-confidence profile graph evidence: Researchability is based on 14 visible people with 4 populated evidence dimensions: named, titled, located, and contactable signals.

Profile association confidence: Profile association sample. Association confidence combines 13 titled profiles and 7 contactable profiles.

People: 14
Named: 14
Titled: 13
Located: 11
Contactable: 7

Data methodology

AeroLeads renders only source-backed fields for this company page.

5 source groups

Company record Matched profile graph Email-pattern aggregate Related company graph Company signal fields

Blank source fields are omitted

Related companies are ordered deterministically

Structured data uses aggregate counts only

Intelligence completeness

9 of 11 major intelligence groups are available for this company.

9 / 11 groups

Complete intelligence record 81.8%

Workforce composition Contactability Email intelligence Decision makers Buying committee Technology talent Domain confidence Market and peer context Company momentum

Evidence quality

This page clears the 60+ AeroLeads company-intelligence evidence threshold.

100 / 100

Priority intelligence record Threshold 60+

Workforce composition Employee email coverage Department contactability Department contactability heatmap Department seniority map Business function mix

Workforce graph

27 signals

Workforce composition, Department contactability, Department contactability heatmap

Contactability

12 signals

Employee email coverage, Multi-function contactability, Email usability mix

Source trust

13 signals

Functional team estimates, Functional coverage gap, Domain confidence

Decision-maker intelligence

9 signals

Decision-maker coverage, Leadership signals, Department leadership coverage

Technology intelligence

6 signals

Technology talent, Technology role diversity, Technology leadership depth

Market and peer context

14 signals

Related company graph, Peer graph strength, Peer position benchmark

Company momentum

6 signals

Company signal breadth, Company momentum, Company momentum score

81 additional source-backed evidence signals are counted in this page quality score.

Prospecting readiness

Mediatonic Games shows strong prospecting fit based on person-level contact coverage, best covered outreach path, decision-maker coverage, and technology workforce evidence.

100 / 100

Strong prospecting fit High-confidence prospecting evidence

Prospecting evidence combines person-level contact coverage, best covered outreach path, decision-maker coverage, technology workforce evidence, and company momentum; raw contact values are hidden.

ICP fit

Strong ICP fit

ICP fit combines company size, market specificity, contactability, buying committee, and technology path; raw contact values are hidden.

100 / 100

Company size

113 employees

Employee estimate is in a common outbound prospecting range.

Market specificity

Peer-informed market profile

1 related peer industry cluster available.

Reachability

High-confidence contact evidence

2 current or verified professional email signals, 5 company-domain email signals, and email-led contact coverage; raw addresses and numbers are hidden.

Buying committee

Reachable buying committee

2 of 2 mapped buying-committee functions include visible decision-maker contact data.

Technology path

Partial technology reachability

Some matched technology role signals include visible contact data.

Account research checklist

Multi-step account research checklist

Account research checklist combines best covered outreach path, buying-committee coverage, ICP fit, technology workforce evidence, related-company graph, and domain trust; raw contact values are hidden.

6 steps

Confirm contact path

General + Senior / Lead

Outreach path evidence combines 4 visible General contact signals and 3 contactable Senior / Lead decision-maker signals; raw contacts are hidden.

Map reachable buying committee

Reachable buying committee

Buying-committee evidence combines 2 mapped buying-committee functions, 2 contactable functions, and Technology / data and Marketing / growth function coverage.

Validate ICP fit

Strong ICP fit

ICP fit combines company size, market specificity, contactability, buying committee, and technology path; raw contact values are hidden.

Review technology path

Partial technology reachability

Some matched technology role signals include visible contact data.

Compare related peers

Limited peer comparison

Compares this company with related-company evidence across employee scale and peer graph evidence.

Check domain trust

Mixed domain alignment

Domain evidence combines website domain, social profile, and company email sample; raw email addresses are hidden.

Contact coverage

High-confidence contact evidence

2 current or verified professional email signals, 5 company-domain email signals, and email-led contact coverage; raw addresses and numbers are hidden.

Best outreach path

General + Senior / Lead

Coverage combines 4 visible General contact signals and 3 contactable Senior / Lead decision-maker signals.

Decision-maker coverage

Reachable buying committee

2 of 2 mapped buying-committee functions include visible decision-maker contact data.

Technology contact path

Partial technology reachability

Some matched technology role signals include visible contact data.

Domain trust signals

Domain confidence for mediatonicgames.com is based on website domain, social profile, and company email sample.

45 / 100

Mixed domain alignment Corroborated domain evidence

Domain evidence combines website domain, social profile, and company email sample; raw email addresses are hidden.

Website domain

mediatonicgames.com

The official website domain is available from the company source record.

Social profile

LinkedIn organization page

A LinkedIn organization page is present for this company record.

Company email sample

5 official-domain source email records

Company-level email source records include official-domain coverage; raw addresses are hidden.

Employee email mismatch: Visible employee email signals do not match the official domain.

Support email domain differs: The support email channel uses a non-official domain.

AeroLeads coverage snapshot

Profile sample: 4; Visible people attached to this company page.
Profile graph depth: Deep profile graph; 29 mapped workforce signals against a 113 employee size estimate.
Contactable sample: 1; Visible people with email or phone data.
Contact channel mix: Email-led contact coverage; Visible profile or company source data is strongest for email outreach.
Contact evidence confidence: High-confidence contact evidence; 2 current or verified professional email signals, 5 company-domain email signals, and email-led contact coverage; raw addresses and numbers are hidden.
Company support channels: Email; Company record includes a support email channel.
Department coverage: 4; Departments represented in AeroLeads workforce signals.
Department concentration: Multi-department workforce; Mapped workforce signals span 4 departments, led by General.
Leadership signals: 8; Department lead or leadership signals in the org data.
Department leader sample: Department leader sample; AeroLeads source data includes 4 leadership signals across 3 departments; rows show titles and contact-channel presence only.
Department leadership coverage: Broad department leadership coverage; Leadership signals appear across 3 of 4 mapped departments.
Leadership density: 27.60; Percent of mapped department signals that are leadership signals.
Department contact coverage: 3; Departments with visible contact samples.
Department contact spread: Broad department contact spread; Visible contact samples appear across 3 of 4 mapped departments.
Department contactability heatmap: Email and phone department contact map; Department samples show 7 email signals and 1 phone signal across 3 contactable departments.
Department seniority map: Multi-department seniority map; Visible department samples map 11 seniority-classified profiles across 4 departments and 3 seniority bands.
Technology talent: 5; Visible profiles matching technology role patterns.
Technology evidence confidence: Reachable technology evidence; 2 matched technology role signals include visible contact data.
Technology reachability: Partial technology reachability; Some matched technology role signals include visible contact data.
Technology contactability rate: 40; Percent of matched technology role signals with visible contact data.
Technology leadership reachability: Partial technology leadership reachability; Some matched technology leadership signals include visible contact data.
Technology department signals: 5; Mapped department profile signals in technology-oriented teams.
Email domain confidence: Non-official email coverage; Visible email signals use non-official domains only.
Domain confidence: Mixed domain alignment; Domain confidence for mediatonicgames.com is based on website domain, social profile, and company email sample.
Email usability mix: Current email coverage sample; AeroLeads source data includes 12 unique visible email signals; 2 are marked current or verified and 5 are professional-type. Raw addresses are hidden.
Contact data safety: Corroborated privacy-safe contact intelligence; AeroLeads exposes contact counts, channel mix, freshness, and domain-alignment evidence while hiding raw email addresses and masking phone numbers in public output.
Company signal breadth: Multi-signal company record; Company-level signals include social audience, company maturity, ownership, and funding.
Company momentum score: Limited company momentum score; Momentum score blends historical funding signal, partial contactability, and peer position from AeroLeads company and profile evidence.
Company ownership signal: Private company record; Company source record includes source type Privately Held.
Audience density: High audience density; 50.80K followers against 113 employee estimate, about 449.60 followers per estimated employee.
Funding recency: Historical funding signal; Last funding round is 87 months before the Jun 2026 source update.
Market specificity: Peer-informed market profile; 1 related peer industry cluster available.
Peer industry clusters: 1; Industries represented by related company records.
Related companies: 10; Company graph links available for comparison.
Industry benchmark: Evidence-backed industry benchmark; Industry benchmark uses 10 related companies, 10 same-industry peers, 3 benchmark dimensions, and 4 peer evidence types from the AeroLeads related-company graph.
Peer benchmark confidence: Multi-signal peer benchmark evidence; Peer benchmark combines 10 related companies with peer graph strength, size benchmark, and size position. Underlying peer graph includes 4 evidence types: industry context, employee benchmarks, website records, social profiles.
Peer position benchmark: Employee-scale peer position benchmark; Peer-position benchmark shows employee scale above 50% of 10 comparable related peers.
Peer comparison matrix: Limited peer comparison; Compares this company with related-company evidence across employee scale and peer graph evidence.
Workforce locations: 9; Locations represented in visible profile signals.
Workforce distribution: Distributed workforce; Visible profile location signals are spread across 9 locations.
Workforce location footprint: Multi-country workforce footprint; Visible profile locations span 9 cities across 2 countries, led by Greater Madrid Metropolitan Area.
Workforce distribution model: International distributed workforce model; Visible profile locations span 2 countries and 9 workforce locations; no single hub exceeds 18% of visible location signals.
Workforce geography evidence confidence: Corroborated workforce geography evidence; Workforce geography spans 9 locations across 11 visible profile signals, with reachable evidence across 6 locations. Top workforce hub differs from company location.
Contactable workforce locations: 6; Workforce locations represented by visible contact samples.
Top contactable workforce location: Greater Madrid Metropolitan Area, Spain; Visible contact samples span 6 workforce locations, led by Greater Madrid Metropolitan Area, Spain.
Workforce seniority tiers: 4; Seniority bands derived from visible profile titles and levels.
Seniority evidence confidence: Corroborated seniority evidence; Seniority graph spans 13 classified profile signals across 4 tiers, with reachable evidence for 7. Contributor-heavy visible sample.
Classified seniority profiles: 13; Visible profiles with usable seniority signals.
Management-to-IC proxy: Contributor-heavy visible sample; 2 managerial seniority signals and 11 contributor signals appear in the visible seniority-classified sample.
Role title diversity: Diverse role title sample; 12 distinct role titles across 13 visible titled profiles.
Visible role titles: 12; Distinct role titles found in visible profile signals.
Business function mix: Multi-function workforce sample; AeroLeads maps 6 visible profile signals into 3 business functions; 3 include visible contact data.
Mapped business functions: 3; Business functions inferred from visible profile titles and departments.
Functional team estimates: Revenue and engineering team estimates; AeroLeads derives 1 visible revenue team profile signal and 4 visible engineering team profile signals from mapped business-function signals.
Functional coverage gaps: Partial function coverage map; Visible people signals cover 3 of 8 core business functions. Not observed in the visible graph: Sales / revenue, People / HR, Finance, and Operations. Treat this as a coverage gap, not confirmed absence.
Contactable role titles: 6; Distinct role titles with visible contact samples.
Contactable role coverage: Diverse contactable role coverage; 6 reachable role titles across 7 contactable titled profiles.
Decision-maker signals: 8; Visible profiles matching seniority or leadership title patterns.
Decision-maker reachability: Partial decision-maker reachability; Some mapped decision-maker signals include visible contact data.
Buying committee evidence confidence: Reachable buying committee; 2 of 2 mapped buying-committee functions include visible decision-maker contact data.
Buyer persona availability: Dual-persona buyer availability; Mapped decision-maker evidence covers Technology buyer and Marketing buyer; 2 of 2 buyer personas include visible contact data.
Decision-maker contactability rate: 37.50; Percent of mapped decision-maker signals with visible contact data.
Best covered outreach path: General + Senior / Lead; Coverage combines 4 visible General contact signals and 3 contactable Senior / Lead decision-maker signals.
Prospecting fit: Strong prospecting fit; Mediatonic Games shows strong prospecting fit based on person-level contact coverage, best covered outreach path, decision-maker coverage, and technology workforce evidence.
ICP fit: Strong ICP fit; Mediatonic Games matches the strong ICP fit band for common outbound filters based on company size, market specificity, contactability, buying committee, and technology path.
Account research checklist: Multi-step account research checklist; Account research checklist combines best covered outreach path, buying-committee coverage, ICP fit, technology workforce evidence, related-company graph, and domain trust; raw contact values are hidden.
Intelligence signal groups: 26; AeroLeads signal groups available for this company.

Market focus signals

Primary industry

Computer Games

Market specificity

Peer-informed market profile

1 related peer industry cluster available.

Market evidence tier

Mapped market evidence

Market evidence combines 2 classification signals from categories, related peer industries, and description keywords. 6 description-backed keyword signals are included.

Industry benchmark

Evidence-backed industry benchmark

Industry benchmark uses 10 related companies, 10 same-industry peers, 3 benchmark dimensions, and 4 peer evidence types from the AeroLeads related-company graph.

Top peer industry: Computer Games; 100% of 10 related peer industry signals.
Peer benchmark evidence: Multi-signal peer benchmark evidence; Peer benchmark combines 10 related companies with peer graph strength, size benchmark, and size position. Underlying peer graph includes 4 evidence types: industry context, employee benchmarks, website records, social profiles.
Size position: Near peer median size; 5 related employee-estimated peers are higher and 5 are lower.
Peer graph strength: Benchmark-ready peer graph; Related peer graph has industry context, employee benchmarks, website records, and social profiles across 10 related companies.

Benchmark dimensions: peer graph strength, size benchmark, and size position.

Company signals

Company signal breadth

Multi-signal company record

Company-level signals include social audience, company maturity, ownership, and funding.

Multi-signal company record evidence: Company record evidence combines 4 source-backed company signal types: social audience, company maturity, ownership, and funding.

Social audience

50.80K

Followers in the company source record.

Social audience evidence tier: Measured social-audience evidence. Social audience evidence uses 50.80K followers from source field social_followers.

Audience density

High audience density

50.80K followers against 113 employee estimate, about 449.60 followers per estimated employee.

Audience-density evidence tier: High-confidence audience-density evidence. Audience-density evidence combines 50.80K social followers, 113 employee estimate, and 449.60 followers per estimated employee.

Company maturity

Mature company record

Company source record includes founding year 2005, about 21 years before 2026.

Company maturity evidence tier: Long-running maturity evidence. Maturity evidence combines founding year 2005, 21 years of company history, and source field founded.

Company ownership

Private company record

Company source record includes source type Privately Held.

Company ownership evidence tier: Structured ownership evidence. Ownership evidence combines source type Privately Held from structured company source fields.

Company momentum

Single momentum signal

Momentum evidence combines high audience density.

Momentum score: 24 / 100

Limited company momentum score. Momentum score blends historical funding signal, partial contactability, and peer position from AeroLeads company and profile evidence.

Multi-signal momentum score evidence: Momentum score evidence combines historical funding signal, partial contactability, and peer position; raw contact values are hidden.

Historical funding signal · 10 Partial contactability · 6 Peer position · 8

Funding

Private equity

33.0M · Apr 24, 2019 · 3 total rounds

Funding evidence tier: High-confidence funding evidence. Funding evidence combines round type Private equity, funding amount 33.0M, last round date Apr 24, 2019, 3 total rounds, and historical funding signal from structured company source fields.

Historical funding signal: Last funding round is 87 months before the Jun 2026 source update.

Workforce composition

Department concentration

Multi-department workforce

Mapped workforce signals span 4 departments, led by General. 69.0% of mapped department signals are in the largest department.

Department concentration evidence tier: Multi-department concentration evidence. Department concentration evidence combines 4 mapped departments, top department General, and 69.0% top-department share.

Department leadership coverage

Broad department leadership coverage

Leadership signals appear across 3 of 4 mapped departments. Leadership signals represent 27.6% of mapped department signals.

Department leadership evidence tier: High-confidence department leadership evidence. Department leadership evidence combines 8 leadership signals, 3 of 4 mapped departments, and 27.6% leadership density.

Department seniority map

Multi-department seniority map

Visible department samples map 11 seniority-classified profiles across 4 departments and 3 seniority bands.

Department seniority evidence tier: High-confidence department seniority evidence. Department seniority evidence combines 11 seniority-classified profiles, 4 departments, 3 seniority bands, and top cell General + Individual contributor with 5 profiles.

General 6 profiles

Senior / Lead: 1 Individual contributor: 5

IT 3 profiles

Senior / Lead: 3

Executive 1 profile

Director: 1

Marketing 1 profile

Senior / Lead: 1

8 leadership signals 3 departments with visible contacts

Department leader sample

1 contactable

AeroLeads source data includes 4 leadership signals across 3 departments; rows show titles and contact-channel presence only.

Department leader evidence tier: Corroborated department leader evidence. Department leader evidence combines 4 leadership signals, 3 departments, and 1 contactable; raw contacts are hidden.

Leader	Department	Seniority	Channel
Maxi Rogers Quality Assurance - Creative Writing - Stage Management	General	Individual contributor	Email
Jamie R. Production Director at Mediatonic Games	Executive	Director	No visible contact channel
Matt Clarke Lead Client Engineer at Mediatonic Games	IT	Senior / Lead	No visible contact channel
Peter Jones Lead Environment Artist En Mediatonic Games	General	Senior / Lead	No visible contact channel

General 20 signals

69.0% of mapped department signals, 4 leadership signals, 4 visible contacts

IT 5 signals

17.2% of mapped department signals, 1 leadership signals, 2 visible contacts

Executive 3 signals

10.3% of mapped department signals, 3 leadership signals

Marketing 1 signals

3.4% of mapped department signals, 1 visible contact

Technology talent signals

5 matched technology role signals, 2 with visible contact data.

Technology evidence tier

Reachable technology evidence

2 matched technology role signals include visible contact data.

Partial technology reachability 40.0%

Some matched technology role signals include visible contact data.

Technology reachability evidence tier: Partial technology reachability evidence. Technology reachability evidence combines 2 contactable technology signals, 5 matched technology signals, and 40.0% role contactability.

High technology leadership depth 80.0%

4 of 5 matched technology role signals indicate leadership seniority.

Technology leadership depth evidence tier: High technology leadership depth evidence. Technology leadership depth evidence combines 4 technology leadership signals, 5 matched technology signals, 80.0% leadership depth, and 2 contactable leadership signals.

Technology leadership coverage

Partial technology leadership reachability

2 of 4 matched technology leadership signals include visible contact data. Some matched technology leadership signals include visible contact data.

Technology leadership reachability evidence tier: Partial technology leadership reachability evidence. Technology leadership reachability evidence combines 2 contactable leadership signals, 4 technology leadership signals, and 50.0% leadership contactability.

5 IT department signals

Technology role mix

Multi-area technology role mix

Matched technology signals span Engineering and Product / design role groups.

Technology role evidence tier: Multi-area technology role evidence. Technology role evidence combines 5 matched technology role signals, 2 technology role groups, Engineering and Product / design, and 2 contactable signals.

Engineering 4 profiles

80.0% of matched technology role signals

Product / design 1 profile

20.0% of matched technology role signals

Matched role examples

Senior Client Developer at Mediatonic 1

Senior Client Engineer En Mediatonic Games 1

Lead Client Engineer at Mediatonic Games 1

Game Designer at Mediatonic Games 1

Workforce seniority mix

Aggregated from 13 classified profile signals.

Largest seniority band

Senior / Lead

6 of 13 classified profile signals, 3 with visible contact data.

Corroborated seniority evidence: Seniority graph spans 13 classified profile signals across 4 tiers, with reachable evidence for 7. Contributor-heavy visible sample.

Management-to-IC proxy

Contributor-heavy visible sample

15.4%

managerial seniority signals

84.6%

contributor seniority signals

2 managerial seniority signals and 11 contributor signals appear in the visible seniority-classified sample.

Management-shape evidence tier: Contributor-heavy management-shape evidence. Management-shape evidence combines 13 seniority-classified signals, 2 managerial signals, 15.4% managerial share, and 11 contributor signals.

Senior / Lead 6 profiles

46.2% of classified seniority signals, 3 with visible contact data

Individual contributor 5 profiles

38.5% of classified seniority signals, 4 with visible contact data

Director 1 profile

7.7% of classified seniority signals

Manager 1 profile

7.7% of classified seniority signals

Workforce geography

Aggregated from 11 visible profile location signals.

Workforce geography evidence

Corroborated workforce geography evidence

Workforce geography spans 9 locations across 11 visible profile signals, with reachable evidence across 6 locations. Top workforce hub differs from company location.

Distribution signal

Distributed workforce

Visible profile location signals are spread across 9 locations.

Workforce distribution model

International distributed workforce model

Visible profile locations span 2 countries and 9 workforce locations; no single hub exceeds 18% of visible location signals.

Corroborated workforce model evidence: Workforce model evidence combines 11 located profile signals, 9 workforce locations, 9 cities, 2 countries, top hub Greater Madrid Metropolitan Area, Spain at 18%, company-location alignment, and 6 reachable locations.

Locations: 9
Countries: 2
Top hub share: 18%

Workforce location footprint

Multi-country workforce footprint

Visible profile locations span 9 cities across 2 countries, led by Greater Madrid Metropolitan Area.

Cities: 9
Countries: 2

Company-location alignment

Top workforce hub differs from company location

The largest visible workforce location is Greater Madrid Metropolitan Area, Spain, while the company location is London, City of, United Kingdom.

Top workforce hub share: 18.2%

Company-location evidence tier: Workforce-location divergence evidence. Company-location alignment evidence combines company location London, City of, United Kingdom, top workforce hub Greater Madrid Metropolitan Area, Spain, 18.2% top workforce hub share, and location difference.

Contactable location spread

Multi-location contact coverage

Visible contact samples span 6 workforce locations, led by Greater Madrid Metropolitan Area, Spain.

Contactable location evidence tier: High-confidence contactable location evidence. Contactable location evidence combines 7 contactable profile location signals, 6 workforce locations, top contactable hub Greater Madrid Metropolitan Area, Spain at 28.6%, and company-location alignment.

Contactable workforce hub differs from company location: The largest contactable workforce location is Greater Madrid Metropolitan Area, Spain, while the company location is London, City of, United Kingdom. Top contactable hub share: 28.6%.

Greater Madrid Metropolitan Area, Spain 2 contacts

28.6% of contactable location signals

London, England, United Kingdom 1 contact

14.3% of contactable location signals

Bristol, England, United Kingdom 1 contact

14.3% of contactable location signals

United Kingdom 1 contact

14.3% of contactable location signals

Newcastle-under-lyme, England, United Kingdom 1 contact

14.3% of contactable location signals

Greater Madrid Metropolitan Area, Spain 2 profiles

18.2% of visible location signals

London, England, United Kingdom 2 profiles

18.2% of visible location signals

Cambridge, England, United Kingdom 1 profile

9.1% of visible location signals

Bristol, England, United Kingdom 1 profile

9.1% of visible location signals

United Kingdom 1 profile

9.1% of visible location signals

Newcastle-under-lyme, England, United Kingdom 1 profile

9.1% of visible location signals

Decision-maker coverage

8 seniority signals, 3 with visible contact data.

Decision-maker evidence tier

Corroborated decision-maker evidence

Decision-maker evidence covers 8 seniority signals, 3 reachable. Buying committee spans 2 functions.

Account planning snapshot

Multi-signal account planning snapshot

Snapshot combines department reachability, decision-maker coverage, and buying-committee function aggregates.

4 account-planning evidence cards available.

Account planning evidence tier: Multi-source account planning evidence. Account planning evidence combines 4 aggregate account-planning cards, best covered outreach path, 2 reachable buying-committee functions, Senior / Lead seniority reachability, and General department contactability; raw contacts are hidden.

Best covered path

General + Senior / Lead

Coverage combines 4 visible General contact signals and 3 contactable Senior / Lead decision-maker signals.

Reachable buying committee

2 of 2 functions

Reachable functions include Technology / data and Marketing / growth.

Most reachable seniority

Senior / Lead

3 of 6 signals in this seniority band include visible contact data.

Top reachable team

General

4 visible contact signals in this department sample.

Partial decision-maker reachability 37.5%

Some mapped decision-maker signals include visible contact data.

Decision-maker reachability evidence tier: Partial decision-maker reachability evidence. Decision-maker reachability evidence combines 3 contactable decision-maker signals, 8 mapped decision-maker signals, and 37.5% contactability.

Email-led decision-maker coverage: Mapped decision-maker contact data is strongest for email, with 3 email signals.

Buying committee function coverage

Multi-function buying-committee coverage

2 of 2 mapped functions include visible decision-maker contact data.

Reachable buying committee: 2 of 2 mapped buying-committee functions include visible decision-maker contact data.

Buying committee evidence tier: Reachable buying-committee evidence. Buying-committee evidence combines 2 mapped buying-committee functions, 2 contactable functions, and Technology / data and Marketing / growth function coverage.

Buyer persona availability: Dual-persona buyer availability. Mapped decision-maker evidence covers Technology buyer and Marketing buyer; 2 of 2 buyer personas include visible contact data. High-confidence buyer persona evidence: Buyer persona evidence combines 2 mapped buyer personas, 2 contactable personas, and Technology buyer and Marketing buyer coverage.

Technology / data: 2 contactable Marketing / growth: 1 contactable

Most reachable seniority

Senior / Lead

3 of 6 seniority signals include visible contact data.

Seniority reachability evidence tier: Corroborated seniority reachability evidence. Seniority reachability evidence combines 3 contactable Senior / Lead signals, 6 Senior / Lead signals, 50.0% tier contactability, and email coverage.

Senior / Lead 6 profiles

75.0% of mapped seniority signals, 3 with visible contact data

Manager 1 profile

12.5% of mapped seniority signals

Director 1 profile

12.5% of mapped seniority signals

Role and function mix

13 visible titled profiles across 12 distinct role titles.

Title mix

Diverse role title sample

12 distinct role titles across 13 visible titled profiles.

Role-title evidence tier: Diverse role-title evidence. Role-title diversity evidence combines 13 visible titled profiles, 12 distinct role titles, and top title Producer at Mediatonic Games at 15.4%.

Business function mix

Multi-function workforce sample

AeroLeads maps 6 visible profile signals into 3 business functions; 3 include visible contact data.

Business-function evidence tier: Corroborated business-function evidence. Business-function evidence combines 6 mapped function profile signals, 3 business functions, 3 contactable signals, 2 contactable functions, and top function Technology / data at 66.7%.

Multi-function contactability map 2 / 3 functions

2 of 3 mapped business functions include visible contact data.

Functional team estimates

Revenue and engineering team estimates

AeroLeads derives 1 visible revenue team profile signal and 4 visible engineering team profile signals from mapped business-function signals.

Corroborated functional team evidence: Functional team estimate evidence combines 1 visible revenue team profile signal and 4 visible engineering team profile signals.

Revenue team estimate 1 profile

16.7% of mapped function signals, 1 with visible contact data; Marketing / growth

Engineering team estimate 4 profiles

66.7% of mapped function signals, 2 with visible contact data; Technology / data

Technology / data 4 profiles

66.7% of mapped function signals, 2 with visible contact data

Marketing / growth 1 profile

16.7% of mapped function signals, 1 with visible contact data

Product / design 1 profile

16.7% of mapped function signals

Contactable role coverage

Diverse contactable role coverage

6 reachable role titles across 7 contactable titled profiles.

Contactable role evidence tier: Diverse contactable role evidence. Contactable role evidence combines 7 contactable titled profiles, 6 reachable role titles, and top reachable role Producer at Mediatonic Games at 28.6%.

Role title reachability

Broad role-title reachability

6 of 12 distinct visible role titles include email or phone signals.

Role-title reachability evidence tier: Corroborated role-title reachability evidence. Role-title reachability evidence combines 12 visible role titles, 6 reachable titles, and 50.0% title reachability.

Producer at Mediatonic Games 2 profiles

15.4% of visible titled profiles

Concept Artist 1 profile