Notash Afra (Farab Construction Company)

Notash Afra (Farab Construction Company) Company Intelligence, Employees & Contact Signals

Contact coverage
Email-led
Visible profile or company source data is strongest for email outreach. 1 visible profile includes direct contact evidence.
People graph depth
26 signals
Deep profile graph across 3 mapped departments.
Account research
6 steps
Account research checklist combines person-level contact coverage, ICP fit, technology workforce evidence, related-company graph, domain trust, and people graph depth; raw contact values are hidden.
Technology talent
5
Technology-oriented role signals in the workforce graph.
Evidence quality 100/100 Priority intelligence record

AeroLeads company intelligence

Notash Afra (Farab Construction Company) workforce and contactability signals

Evidence from AeroLeads company records, matched professional profiles, and related company graph.

High confidence
Intelligence completeness
Partial intelligence record
6 of 11 major intelligence groups are available for this company.
Largest mapped team
IT
11 profile signals in IT.
Departments mapped
3
Workforce composition from AeroLeads profile data.
Profile graph
Deep profile graph
26 mapped workforce signals against a 31 employee size estimate.
Top reachable team
IT
1 visible contact signal.
Top seniority band
Individual contributor
13 of 15 classified profile signals.
Visible contact sample
1
Displayed people with email or phone data.

Profile graph researchability

Visible people graph includes 16 visible people: 16 named, 15 titled, 16 located, and 1 contactable.

Multi-signal profile graph
Profile coverage evidence tier: Deep profile coverage evidence. Profile coverage evidence combines 26 mapped workforce signals, 31 employee size estimate, and 83.9% profile graph coverage.
Corroborated profile graph evidence: Researchability is based on 16 visible people with 4 populated evidence dimensions: named, titled, located, and contactable signals.
Profile association confidence: Profile association sample. Association confidence combines 15 titled profiles and 1 contactable profile.
People
16
Named
16
Titled
15
Located
16
Contactable
1

Data methodology

AeroLeads renders only source-backed fields for this company page.

4 source groups
Company record Matched profile graph Related company graph Company signal fields
Blank source fields are omitted
Related companies are ordered deterministically
Structured data uses aggregate counts only

Intelligence completeness

6 of 11 major intelligence groups are available for this company.

6 / 11 groups
Partial intelligence record 54.5%
Workforce composition Contactability Decision makers Technology talent Domain confidence Market and peer context

Evidence quality

This page clears the 60+ AeroLeads company-intelligence evidence threshold.

100 / 100
Priority intelligence record Threshold 60+
Workforce composition Employee email coverage Department contactability Department seniority map Decision-maker coverage Technology talent
Workforce graph
18 signals
Workforce composition, Department contactability, Department seniority map
Contactability
8 signals
Employee email coverage, Official-domain contact freshness, Contact channel mix
Decision-maker intelligence
4 signals
Decision-maker coverage, Leadership signals, Department leadership coverage
Technology intelligence
2 signals
Technology talent, Technology reachability
Market and peer context
14 signals
Related company graph, Peer graph strength, Peer position benchmark
Company momentum
3 signals
Company signal breadth, Company momentum score, Company ownership signal
Source trust
8 signals
Domain confidence, Intelligence completeness, Company description
51 additional source-backed evidence signals are counted in this page quality score.

Prospecting readiness

Notash Afra (Farab Construction Company) shows actionable prospecting fit based on person-level contact coverage, decision-maker coverage, technology workforce evidence, and people graph depth.

65 / 100
Actionable prospecting fit High-confidence prospecting evidence

Prospecting evidence combines person-level contact coverage, decision-maker coverage, technology workforce evidence, people graph depth, and peer context; raw contact values are hidden.

ICP fit
Qualified ICP fit

ICP fit combines company size, market specificity, contactability, technology path, and domain trust; raw contact values are hidden.

70 / 100
Company size
31 employees
Employee estimate is in a common outbound prospecting range.
Market specificity
Focused market profile
12 market classification signals across categories, specialties, and related peer industries.
Reachability
Mapped contact-channel evidence
Visible profile or company source data is strongest for email outreach.
Technology path
Partial technology reachability
Some matched technology role signals include visible contact data.
Domain trust
Basic domain identity
Domain evidence combines website domain, social profile, and company email sample; raw email addresses are hidden.
Account research checklist
Multi-step account research checklist

Account research checklist combines person-level contact coverage, ICP fit, technology workforce evidence, related-company graph, domain trust, and people graph depth; raw contact values are hidden.

6 steps
Confirm contact coverage
Mapped contact-channel evidence
Visible profile or company source data is strongest for email outreach.
Validate ICP fit
Qualified ICP fit
ICP fit combines company size, market specificity, contactability, technology path, and domain trust; raw contact values are hidden.
Review technology path
Partial technology reachability
Some matched technology role signals include visible contact data.
Compare related peers
Limited peer comparison
Compares this company with related-company evidence across employee scale and peer graph evidence.
Check domain trust
Basic domain identity
Domain evidence combines website domain, social profile, and company email sample; raw email addresses are hidden.
Review people graph depth
Deep profile graph
26 mapped workforce signals against a 31 employee size estimate.
Contact coverage
Mapped contact-channel evidence
Visible profile or company source data is strongest for email outreach.
Decision-maker coverage
No visible decision-maker contact coverage
Mapped decision-maker signals do not include visible contact data.
Technology contact path
Partial technology reachability
Some matched technology role signals include visible contact data.
People graph depth
Deep profile graph
26 mapped workforce signals against a 31 employee size estimate.

Domain trust signals

Domain confidence for notashafra.com is based on website domain, social profile, and company email sample.

45 / 100
Basic domain identity Corroborated domain evidence

Domain evidence combines website domain, social profile, and company email sample; raw email addresses are hidden.

Website domain
notashafra.com
The official website domain is available from the company source record.
Social profile
LinkedIn organization page
A LinkedIn organization page is present for this company record.
Company email sample
3 official-domain source email records
Company-level email source records include official-domain coverage; raw addresses are hidden.

AeroLeads coverage snapshot

Profile sample
3
Visible people attached to this company page.
Profile graph depth
Deep profile graph
26 mapped workforce signals against a 31 employee size estimate.
Contactable sample
1
Visible people with email or phone data.
Contact channel mix
Email-led contact coverage
Visible profile or company source data is strongest for email outreach.
Contact evidence confidence
Mapped contact-channel evidence
Visible profile or company source data is strongest for email outreach.
Department coverage
3
Departments represented in AeroLeads workforce signals.
Department concentration
Multi-department workforce
Mapped workforce signals span 3 departments, led by General.
Leadership signals
4
Department lead or leadership signals in the org data.
Department leader sample
Limited department leader sample
AeroLeads source data includes 2 leadership signals across 2 departments; rows show titles and contact-channel presence only.
Department leadership coverage
Broad department leadership coverage
Leadership signals appear across 2 of 3 mapped departments.
Leadership density
15.40
Percent of mapped department signals that are leadership signals.
Department contact coverage
1
Departments with visible contact samples.
Department contact spread
Focused department contact spread
Visible contact samples appear in 1 of 3 mapped departments.
Department seniority map
Multi-department seniority map
Visible department samples map 15 seniority-classified profiles across 3 departments and 2 seniority bands.
Technology talent
5
Visible profiles matching technology role patterns.
Technology evidence confidence
Reachable technology evidence
1 matched technology role signal include visible contact data.
Technology reachability
Partial technology reachability
Some matched technology role signals include visible contact data.
Technology contactability rate
20
Percent of matched technology role signals with visible contact data.
Technology department signals
11
Mapped department profile signals in technology-oriented teams.
Domain confidence
Basic domain identity
Domain confidence for notashafra.com is based on website domain, social profile, and company email sample.
Contact freshness
Dated contact metadata
AeroLeads source data includes 3 dated contact records; 0 fall within 90 days and 0 fall within 12 months of the Jun 2026 source update. Raw emails and phone numbers are hidden.
Contact data safety
Corroborated privacy-safe contact intelligence
AeroLeads exposes contact counts, channel mix, freshness, and domain-alignment evidence while hiding raw email addresses and masking phone numbers in public output.
Official-domain contact freshness
Dated official-domain contact metadata
3 dated official-domain email records; 0 fall within 12 months of the Jun 2026 source update.
Company signal breadth
Multi-signal company record
Company-level signals include social audience, company maturity, and ownership.
Company momentum score
Limited company momentum score
Momentum score blends partial contactability and peer position from AeroLeads company and profile evidence.
Company ownership signal
Private company record
Company source record includes source type Privately Held.
Audience density
Low audience density
305 followers against 31 employee estimate, about 9.80 followers per estimated employee.
Specialty signals
6
Specialty tags in the company record.
Market specificity
Focused market profile
12 market classification signals across categories, specialties, and related peer industries.
Peer industry clusters
8
Industries represented by related company records.
Related companies
10
Company graph links available for comparison.
Industry benchmark
Evidence-backed industry benchmark
Industry benchmark uses 10 related companies, 1 same-industry peer, 3 benchmark dimensions, and 4 peer evidence types from the AeroLeads related-company graph.
Peer benchmark confidence
Multi-signal peer benchmark evidence
Peer benchmark combines 10 related companies with peer graph strength, size benchmark, and size position. Underlying peer graph includes 4 evidence types: industry context, employee benchmarks, website records, social profiles.
Peer position benchmark
Employee-scale peer position benchmark
Peer-position benchmark shows employee scale above 30% of 10 comparable related peers.
Peer comparison matrix
Limited peer comparison
Compares this company with related-company evidence across employee scale and peer graph evidence.
Workforce locations
8
Locations represented in visible profile signals.
Workforce distribution
Multi-location workforce
Visible profile location signals span 8 locations, led by Tehran, Tehran Province, Iran.
Workforce location footprint
Multi-country workforce footprint
Visible profile locations span 8 cities across 4 countries, led by Tehran.
Workforce distribution model
International distributed workforce model
Visible profile locations span 4 countries and 8 workforce locations; no single hub exceeds 43% of visible location signals.
Workforce geography evidence confidence
Multi-location workforce geography evidence
Workforce geography spans 8 locations across 16 visible profile signals. Top workforce hub differs from company location.
Workforce seniority tiers
2
Seniority bands derived from visible profile titles and levels.
Seniority evidence confidence
Corroborated seniority evidence
Seniority graph spans 15 classified profile signals across 2 tiers, with reachable evidence for 1. Contributor-heavy visible sample.
Classified seniority profiles
15
Visible profiles with usable seniority signals.
Management-to-IC proxy
Contributor-heavy visible sample
2 managerial seniority signals and 13 contributor signals appear in the visible seniority-classified sample.
Role title diversity
Diverse role title sample
15 distinct role titles across 15 visible titled profiles.
Visible role titles
15
Distinct role titles found in visible profile signals.
Decision-maker signals
2
Visible profiles matching seniority or leadership title patterns.
Decision-maker reachability
No visible decision-maker contact coverage
Mapped decision-maker signals do not include visible contact data.
Prospecting fit
Actionable prospecting fit
Notash Afra (Farab Construction Company) shows actionable prospecting fit based on person-level contact coverage, decision-maker coverage, technology workforce evidence, and people graph depth.
ICP fit
Qualified ICP fit
Notash Afra (Farab Construction Company) matches the qualified ICP fit band for common outbound filters based on company size, market specificity, contactability, technology path, and domain trust.
Account research checklist
Multi-step account research checklist
Account research checklist combines person-level contact coverage, ICP fit, technology workforce evidence, related-company graph, domain trust, and people graph depth; raw contact values are hidden.
Intelligence signal groups
18
AeroLeads signal groups available for this company.

Market focus signals

Primary industry
Construction
Market specificity
Focused market profile
12 market classification signals across categories, specialties, and related peer industries.
Market evidence tier
High-confidence market evidence
Market evidence combines 12 classification signals from categories, specialties, related peer industries, and description keywords. 6 description-backed keyword signals are included.
Industry benchmark
Evidence-backed industry benchmark
Industry benchmark uses 10 related companies, 1 same-industry peer, 3 benchmark dimensions, and 4 peer evidence types from the AeroLeads related-company graph.
Top peer industry
Oil and Gas
30% of 10 related peer industry signals.
Peer benchmark evidence
Multi-signal peer benchmark evidence
Peer benchmark combines 10 related companies with peer graph strength, size benchmark, and size position. Underlying peer graph includes 4 evidence types: industry context, employee benchmarks, website records, social profiles.
Size position
Smaller than most related peers
7 of 10 related employee-estimated peers are higher.
Peer graph strength
Benchmark-ready peer graph
Related peer graph has industry context, employee benchmarks, website records, and social profiles across 10 related companies.
Benchmark dimensions: peer graph strength, size benchmark, and size position.
Categories
Construction
Specialties
Oil & Gas Petrochemical Thermal Power Plant Hydro Power Plant Railway Pipeline
Product-market keyword evidence
Description-backed market keywords
Keyword evidence comes from 3 source field groups: Category, Specialty, Description.
Product-market keyword evidence tier: High-confidence product-market keyword evidence. Product-market keyword evidence combines 13 unique market keywords, 3 source field groups, and 6 description-backed keywords (1 category, 6 specialty, and 6 description).
Construction · Category Oil & Gas · Specialty Petrochemical · Specialty Thermal Power Plant · Specialty Hydro Power Plant · Specialty Railway · Specialty Pipeline · Specialty was established · Description power plants projects · Description thermal power plants · Description oil gas petrochemical · Description experience accumulated · Description
Related peer industries
Peer-industry evidence tier: High-confidence peer-industry evidence. Peer-industry evidence combines 10 related companies, 5 peer-industry clusters, and top peer industry Oil and Gas at 30.0%.
Oil and Gas 3 peers
30.0% of related peer industries
Appliances, Electrical, and Electronics Manufacturing 1 peer
10.0% of related peer industries
Staffing and Recruiting 1 peer
10.0% of related peer industries
Construction 1 peer
10.0% of related peer industries
Electrical Equipment Manufacturing 1 peer
10.0% of related peer industries

Company signals

Company signal breadth
Multi-signal company record
Company-level signals include social audience, company maturity, and ownership.
Corroborated company record evidence: Company record evidence combines 3 source-backed company signal types: social audience, company maturity, and ownership.
Social audience
305
Followers in the company source record.
Social audience evidence tier: Limited social-audience evidence. Social audience evidence uses 305 followers from source field social_followers.
Audience density
Low audience density
305 followers against 31 employee estimate, about 9.80 followers per estimated employee.
Audience-density evidence tier: Limited audience-density evidence. Audience-density evidence combines 305 social followers, 31 employee estimate, and 9.80 followers per estimated employee.
Company maturity
Scaling company history
Company source record includes founding year 2008, about 18 years before 2026.
Company maturity evidence tier: Founding-year maturity evidence. Maturity evidence combines founding year 2008, 18 years of company history, and source field founded.
Company ownership
Private company record
Company source record includes source type Privately Held.
Company ownership evidence tier: Structured ownership evidence. Ownership evidence combines source type Privately Held from structured company source fields.

Workforce composition

Department concentration
Multi-department workforce
Mapped workforce signals span 3 departments, led by General. 53.8% of mapped department signals are in the largest department.
Department concentration evidence tier: Multi-department concentration evidence. Department concentration evidence combines 3 mapped departments, top department General, and 53.8% top-department share.
Department leadership coverage
Broad department leadership coverage
Leadership signals appear across 2 of 3 mapped departments. Leadership signals represent 15.4% of mapped department signals.
Department leadership evidence tier: Corroborated department leadership evidence. Department leadership evidence combines 4 leadership signals, 2 of 3 mapped departments, and 15.4% leadership density.
Department seniority map
Multi-department seniority map
Visible department samples map 15 seniority-classified profiles across 3 departments and 2 seniority bands.
Department seniority evidence tier: High-confidence department seniority evidence. Department seniority evidence combines 15 seniority-classified profiles, 3 departments, 2 seniority bands, and top cell General + Individual contributor with 7 profiles.
General 8 profiles
Manager: 1 Individual contributor: 7
IT 6 profiles
Individual contributor: 6
Sales 1 profile
Manager: 1
4 leadership signals 1 departments with visible contacts
Department leader sample
Limited department leader sample
0 contactable

AeroLeads source data includes 2 leadership signals across 2 departments; rows show titles and contact-channel presence only.

Department leader evidence tier: Corroborated department leader evidence. Department leader evidence combines 2 leadership signals and 2 departments; raw contacts are hidden.
Leader Department Seniority Channel
Zahed Faraji
Account Manager at Notash Afra (Farab Construction Company)
Sales Manager No visible contact channel
Mohammadali Bagheri Hajiabadi
Project Manager
General Manager No visible contact channel
General 14 signals
53.8% of mapped department signals, 3 leadership signals
IT 11 signals
42.3% of mapped department signals, 1 visible contact
Sales 1 signals
3.8% of mapped department signals, 1 leadership signals

Technology talent signals

5 matched technology role signals, 1 with visible contact data.

Technology evidence tier
Reachable technology evidence
1 matched technology role signal include visible contact data.
Partial technology reachability 20.0%
Some matched technology role signals include visible contact data.
Technology reachability evidence tier: Partial technology reachability evidence. Technology reachability evidence combines 1 contactable technology signal, 5 matched technology signals, and 20.0% role contactability.
11 IT department signals
Engineering 5 profiles
100.0% of matched technology role signals
Matched role examples
Engineer 1
Electrical and Instrumentation Engineer at Notash Afra (Farab Construction Company) 1
Mechanical Engineer 1
Project Control Engineer at Notash Afra (Farab Construction Company) 1

Workforce seniority mix

Aggregated from 15 classified profile signals.

Largest seniority band
Individual contributor
13 of 15 classified profile signals, 1 with visible contact data.
Corroborated seniority evidence: Seniority graph spans 15 classified profile signals across 2 tiers, with reachable evidence for 1. Contributor-heavy visible sample.
Management-to-IC proxy
Contributor-heavy visible sample
13.3%
managerial seniority signals
86.7%
contributor seniority signals
2 managerial seniority signals and 13 contributor signals appear in the visible seniority-classified sample.
Management-shape evidence tier: Contributor-heavy management-shape evidence. Management-shape evidence combines 15 seniority-classified signals, 2 managerial signals, 13.3% managerial share, and 13 contributor signals.
Individual contributor 13 profiles
86.7% of classified seniority signals, 1 with visible contact data
Manager 2 profiles
13.3% of classified seniority signals

Workforce geography

Aggregated from 16 visible profile location signals.

Workforce geography evidence
Multi-location workforce geography evidence
Workforce geography spans 8 locations across 16 visible profile signals. Top workforce hub differs from company location.
Distribution signal
Multi-location workforce
Visible profile location signals span 8 locations, led by Tehran, Tehran Province, Iran.
Workforce distribution model
International distributed workforce model
Visible profile locations span 4 countries and 8 workforce locations; no single hub exceeds 43% of visible location signals.
Corroborated workforce model evidence: Workforce model evidence combines 16 located profile signals, 8 workforce locations, 8 cities, 4 countries, top hub Tehran, Tehran Province, Iran at 43%, and company-location alignment.
Locations
8
Countries
4
Top hub share
43%
Workforce location footprint
Multi-country workforce footprint
Visible profile locations span 8 cities across 4 countries, led by Tehran.
Cities
8
Countries
4
Company-location alignment
Top workforce hub differs from company location
The largest visible workforce location is Tehran, Tehran Province, Iran, while the company location is Ir.
Top workforce hub share: 43.8%
Company-location evidence tier: Workforce-location divergence evidence. Company-location alignment evidence combines company location Ir, top workforce hub Tehran, Tehran Province, Iran, 43.8% top workforce hub share, and location difference.
Tehran, Tehran Province, Iran 7 profiles
43.8% of visible location signals
Iran, Islamic Republic of 3 profiles
18.8% of visible location signals
Khoda Afarin County, East Azerbaijan Province, Iran 1 profile
6.2% of visible location signals
United States 1 profile
6.2% of visible location signals
Berlin, Germany 1 profile
6.2% of visible location signals
Kermanshah Province, Iran 1 profile
6.2% of visible location signals

Decision-maker coverage

2 seniority signals.

Decision-maker evidence tier
Mapped decision-maker evidence
Decision-maker evidence covers 2 seniority signals.
No visible decision-maker contact coverage
Mapped decision-maker signals do not include visible contact data.
Manager 2 profiles
100.0% of mapped seniority signals

Role and function mix

15 visible titled profiles across 15 distinct role titles.

Title mix
Diverse role title sample
15 distinct role titles across 15 visible titled profiles.
Role-title evidence tier: Diverse role-title evidence. Role-title diversity evidence combines 15 visible titled profiles, 15 distinct role titles, and top title .. at 6.7%.
.. 1 profile
6.7% of visible titled profiles
Account Manager at Notash Afra (Farab Construction Company) 1 profile
6.7% of visible titled profiles
Coating Inspector at Notash Afra (Farab Construction Company) 1 profile
6.7% of visible titled profiles
Electrical and Instrumentation Engineer at Notash Afra (Farab Construction Company) 1 profile
6.7% of visible titled profiles
Engineer 1 profile
6.7% of visible titled profiles
Enginer at Notash Afra (Farab Construction Company) 1 profile
6.7% of visible titled profiles

Contactability signals

Contactability score 33.3%
1 of 3 visible profiles include email or phone signals.
Contact channel mix
Email-led contact coverage
Visible profile or company source data is strongest for email outreach.
Contact evidence tier
Mapped contact-channel evidence
Visible profile or company source data is strongest for email outreach.
Contact data safety
Corroborated privacy-safe contact intelligence
AeroLeads exposes contact counts, channel mix, freshness, and domain-alignment evidence while hiding raw email addresses and masking phone numbers in public output.
Aggregate signals
4
Channel coverage
Email aggregate coverage
Evidence groups
4
Corroborated contact-safety evidence: Contact-safety evidence combines visible profile contact sample, company email sample, dated contact metadata, and official-domain email evidence; public schema uses aggregate variables only.
Aggregate-only contact schema: Dataset variables use counts, rates, channel labels, freshness bands, and domain-alignment metrics instead of raw contact values.
Contact freshness
Dated contact metadata
AeroLeads source data includes 3 dated contact records; 0 fall within 90 days and 0 fall within 12 months of the Jun 2026 source update. Raw emails and phone numbers are hidden.
Contact freshness evidence tier: Dated contact freshness evidence. Contact freshness evidence combines 3 dated contact records, email timestamps, and 3 official-domain dated email records.
3 dated records 0 within 90 days 0.0% fresh rate 0 within 12 months Latest Sep 2021
Dated email metadata: Dated contact records include 3 email records.
Dated official-domain contact metadata: 3 dated official-domain email records; 0 fall within 12 months of the Jun 2026 source update.
Visible people
3
With contact data
1
Email coverage
1
33.3% of visible profiles
Company email sample
Limited company email sample
AeroLeads source data includes 3 email records across 1 domain; raw addresses are hidden. 3 match notashafra.com.
Source email evidence tier: Corroborated source email evidence. Source email evidence combines 3 unique source email records, 1 domain, 3 matching notashafra.com, and 100.0% official-domain rate.

Department contact samples

Focused department contact spread: Visible contact samples appear in 1 of 3 mapped departments.
Department contactability evidence tier: Limited department contactability evidence. Department contactability evidence combines 1 visible contact sample, 1 of 3 mapped departments, and 1 email signal; raw contacts are hidden.
Department Contacts Email Official email Phone
IT 1 1 0 0
Farab Construction Company was established in 2008 as Notash Afra Company, with the support of Farab Company. The Farab Construction Company specialized in execution of power plants projects, including both Hydro and thermal power plants; and Oil, Gas & Petrochemical industrial projects. Relying on the knowledge and experience accumulated in Farab Company, coupled with competent experts in different fields, provided Farab Construction Company a firm ground for execution of projects in different industries and taking giant strides towards quantitative and qualitative development. Enjoying the services of experienced personnel, and application of an exceptional mix of updated technologies and native know-hows, have turned Farab Construction Company into a trustworthy service provider, both inside the country and abroad, and have paved the way for continuous achievements.
Explore visible people signals for Notash Afra (Farab Construction Company) by role, title, or keyword.

1 of 3 visible profiles include email or phone signals in AeroLeads.

Notash Afra (Farab Construction Company) Questions

Notash Afra (Farab Construction Company) people graph sample