Open Communities Alliance

Open Communities Alliance Company Intelligence, Employees & Contact Signals

Contact coverage
Email + phone
Visible profile or company source data includes email and phone channels. 2 visible profiles include direct contact evidence.
People graph depth
5 signals
Deep profile graph across 4 mapped departments.
Account research
6 steps
Account research checklist combines best covered outreach path, buying-committee coverage, ICP fit, technology workforce evidence, related-company graph, and domain trust; raw contact values are hidden.
Technology talent
1
Technology-oriented role signals in the workforce graph.
Evidence quality 100/100 Priority intelligence record

AeroLeads company intelligence

Open Communities Alliance workforce and contactability signals

Evidence from AeroLeads company records, matched professional profiles, and related company graph.

High confidence
Intelligence completeness
Strong intelligence record
8 of 11 major intelligence groups are available for this company.
Largest mapped team
Legal
1 profile signals in Legal.
Departments mapped
4
Workforce composition from AeroLeads profile data.
Profile graph
Deep profile graph
5 mapped workforce signals against a 11 employee size estimate.
Top reachable team
General
2 visible contact signals.
Top seniority band
Director
3 of 8 classified profile signals.
Visible contact sample
2
Displayed people with email or phone data.

Profile graph researchability

Visible people graph includes 8 visible people: 8 named, 8 titled, 7 located, and 6 contactable.

Multi-signal profile graph
Profile coverage evidence tier: Deep profile coverage evidence. Profile coverage evidence combines 5 mapped workforce signals, 11 employee size estimate, and 45.5% profile graph coverage.
High-confidence profile graph evidence: Researchability is based on 8 visible people with 4 populated evidence dimensions: named, titled, located, and contactable signals.
Profile association confidence: Corroborated profile association. Association confidence combines 8 titled profiles, 2 official-domain email profiles, 2 titled profiles with official-domain email, 2 located profiles with official-domain email, and 6 contactable profiles.
People
8
Named
8
Titled
8
Located
7
Contactable
6

Data methodology

AeroLeads renders only source-backed fields for this company page.

5 source groups
Company record Matched profile graph Email-pattern aggregate Related company graph Company signal fields
Blank source fields are omitted
Related companies are ordered deterministically
Structured data uses aggregate counts only

Intelligence completeness

8 of 11 major intelligence groups are available for this company.

8 / 11 groups
Strong intelligence record 72.7%
Workforce composition Contactability Email intelligence Decision makers Buying committee Technology talent Domain confidence Market and peer context

Evidence quality

This page clears the 60+ AeroLeads company-intelligence evidence threshold.

100 / 100
Priority intelligence record Threshold 60+
Workforce composition Employee email coverage Employee phone coverage Department contactability Department contactability heatmap Official-domain department contactability
Workforce graph
35 signals
Workforce composition, Department contactability, Department contactability heatmap
Contactability
18 signals
Employee email coverage, Employee phone coverage, Multi-function contactability
Source trust
14 signals
Functional team estimates, Functional coverage gap, Domain confidence
Decision-maker intelligence
13 signals
Decision-maker coverage, Leadership signals, Department leadership coverage
Technology intelligence
2 signals
Technology talent, Technology reachability
Market and peer context
13 signals
Related company graph, Peer graph strength, Peer position benchmark
Company momentum
3 signals
Company signal breadth, Company momentum score, Company ownership signal
92 additional source-backed evidence signals are counted in this page quality score.

Prospecting readiness

Open Communities Alliance shows strong prospecting fit based on person-level contact coverage, best covered outreach path, decision-maker coverage, and technology workforce evidence.

90 / 100
Strong prospecting fit High-confidence prospecting evidence

Prospecting evidence combines person-level contact coverage, best covered outreach path, decision-maker coverage, technology workforce evidence, and people graph depth; raw contact values are hidden.

ICP fit
Strong ICP fit

ICP fit combines company size, market specificity, contactability, buying committee, and technology path; raw contact values are hidden.

90 / 100
Company size
11 employees
Employee estimate is in a common outbound prospecting range.
Market specificity
Tagged market profile
2 category and specialty signals in the company record.
Reachability
High-confidence contact evidence
3 current or verified professional email signals, 4 company-domain email signals, and multi-channel contact coverage; raw addresses and numbers are hidden.
Buying committee
Reachable buying committee
2 of 2 mapped buying-committee functions include visible decision-maker contact data.
Technology path
High technology reachability
Most matched technology role signals include visible contact data.
Account research checklist
Multi-step account research checklist

Account research checklist combines best covered outreach path, buying-committee coverage, ICP fit, technology workforce evidence, related-company graph, and domain trust; raw contact values are hidden.

6 steps
Confirm contact path
General + Director
Outreach path evidence combines 2 visible General contact signals, 3 contactable Director decision-maker signals, and 2 official-domain decision-maker email signals; raw contacts are hidden.
Map reachable buying committee
Reachable buying committee
Buying-committee evidence combines 2 mapped buying-committee functions, 2 contactable functions, 1 official-domain function on ctoca.org, and Legal / compliance and Operations function coverage.
Validate ICP fit
Strong ICP fit
ICP fit combines company size, market specificity, contactability, buying committee, and technology path; raw contact values are hidden.
Review technology path
High technology reachability
Most matched technology role signals include visible contact data.
Compare related peers
Limited peer comparison
Compares this company with related-company evidence across employee scale and peer graph evidence.
Check domain trust
High-confidence domain alignment
Domain evidence combines website domain, social profile, employee email alignment, profile-domain association, and company email sample; raw email addresses are hidden.
Contact coverage
High-confidence contact evidence
3 current or verified professional email signals, 4 company-domain email signals, and multi-channel contact coverage; raw addresses and numbers are hidden.
Best outreach path
General + Director
Coverage combines 2 visible General contact signals, 3 contactable Director decision-maker signals, and 2 official-domain decision-maker email signals.
Decision-maker coverage
Reachable buying committee
2 of 2 mapped buying-committee functions include visible decision-maker contact data.
Technology contact path
High technology reachability
Most matched technology role signals include visible contact data.

Domain trust signals

Domain confidence for ctoca.org is based on website domain, social profile, employee email alignment, profile-domain association, and company email sample.

90 / 100
High-confidence domain alignment High-confidence domain evidence

Domain evidence combines website domain, social profile, employee email alignment, profile-domain association, and company email sample; raw email addresses are hidden.

Website domain
ctoca.org
The official website domain is available from the company source record.
Social profile
LinkedIn organization page
A LinkedIn organization page is present for this company record.
Employee email alignment
4 official-domain email signals
28% of visible employee email signals match ctoca.org; raw addresses are hidden.
Profile-domain association
2 people with official-domain email
Matched people include official-domain email evidence; raw addresses are hidden.
Company email sample
4 official-domain source email records
Company-level email source records include official-domain coverage; raw addresses are hidden.

AeroLeads coverage snapshot

Profile sample
4
Visible people attached to this company page.
Profile graph depth
Deep profile graph
5 mapped workforce signals against a 11 employee size estimate.
Contactable sample
2
Visible people with email or phone data.
Contact channel mix
Multi-channel contact coverage
Visible profile or company source data includes email and phone channels.
Contact evidence confidence
High-confidence contact evidence
3 current or verified professional email signals, 4 company-domain email signals, and multi-channel contact coverage; raw addresses and numbers are hidden.
Department coverage
4
Departments represented in AeroLeads workforce signals.
Department concentration
Balanced department spread
Mapped workforce signals are spread across 4 departments.
Leadership signals
4
Department lead or leadership signals in the org data.
Department leader sample
Department leader sample
AeroLeads source data includes 4 leadership signals across 3 departments; rows show titles and contact-channel presence only.
Official-domain department leaders
Multi-department official-domain leaders
2 department leader samples across 2 departments include company-domain email signals.
Department leadership coverage
Broad department leadership coverage
Leadership signals appear across 3 of 4 mapped departments.
Leadership density
80
Percent of mapped department signals that are leadership signals.
Department contact coverage
4
Departments with visible contact samples.
Department contact spread
Broad department contact spread
Visible contact samples appear across 4 of 4 mapped departments.
Department contactability heatmap
Email and phone department contact map
Department samples show 5 email signals and 2 phone signals across 4 contactable departments.
Official-domain department contactability
Multi-department official-domain coverage
2 of 4 mapped departments include visible company-domain email signals.
Department seniority map
Multi-department seniority map
Visible department samples map 5 seniority-classified profiles across 4 departments and 3 seniority bands.
Technology talent
1
Visible profiles matching technology role patterns.
Technology evidence confidence
Reachable technology evidence
1 matched technology role signal include visible contact data.
Technology reachability
High technology reachability
Most matched technology role signals include visible contact data.
Technology contactability rate
100
Percent of matched technology role signals with visible contact data.
Technology department signals
1
Mapped department profile signals in technology-oriented teams.
Email-pattern variants
2
Distinct matched business email patterns.
Official-domain emails
4
Email signals matching ctoca.org.
Email domain confidence
Mixed-domain coverage
Visible email signals include official-domain and non-official domains.
Domain confidence
High-confidence domain alignment
Domain confidence for ctoca.org is based on website domain, social profile, employee email alignment, profile-domain association, and company email sample.
Email usability mix
Current email coverage sample
AeroLeads source data includes 14 unique visible email signals; 3 are marked current or verified and 10 are professional-type. Raw addresses are hidden.
Contact freshness
Dated contact metadata
AeroLeads source data includes 4 dated contact records; 0 fall within 90 days and 0 fall within 12 months of the Jun 2026 source update. Raw emails and phone numbers are hidden.
Contact data safety
Strong privacy-safe contact intelligence
AeroLeads exposes contact counts, channel mix, freshness, and domain-alignment evidence while hiding raw email addresses and masking phone numbers in public output.
Official-domain contact freshness
Dated official-domain contact metadata
4 dated official-domain email records; 0 fall within 12 months of the Jun 2026 source update.
Company signal breadth
Multi-signal company record
Company-level signals include social audience, company maturity, and ownership.
Company momentum score
Limited company momentum score
Momentum score blends contactability and peer position from AeroLeads company and profile evidence.
Company ownership signal
Nonprofit organization record
Company source record includes source type Nonprofit.
Audience density
Low audience density
102 followers against 11 employee estimate, about 9.30 followers per estimated employee.
Specialty signals
1
Specialty tags in the company record.
Market specificity
Tagged market profile
2 category and specialty signals in the company record.
Peer industry clusters
6
Industries represented by related company records.
Related companies
10
Company graph links available for comparison.
Industry benchmark
Peer-informed industry benchmark
Industry benchmark uses 10 related companies, 3 benchmark dimensions, and 3 peer evidence types from the AeroLeads related-company graph.
Peer benchmark confidence
Multi-signal peer benchmark evidence
Peer benchmark combines 10 related companies with peer graph strength, size benchmark, and size position. Underlying peer graph includes 3 evidence types: employee benchmarks, website records, social profiles.
Peer position benchmark
Employee-scale peer position benchmark
Peer-position benchmark shows employee scale above 33.3% of 9 comparable related peers.
Peer comparison matrix
Limited peer comparison
Compares this company with related-company evidence across employee scale and peer graph evidence.
Workforce locations
5
Locations represented in visible profile signals.
Workforce distribution
Distributed workforce
Visible profile location signals are spread across 5 locations.
Workforce location footprint
Multi-city workforce footprint
Visible profile locations span 5 cities across 1 country, led by Hartford.
Workforce distribution model
Broad distributed workforce model
Visible profile locations are spread across 5 workforce locations, with Hartford, Connecticut, United States as the largest hub at 28%.
Workforce geography evidence confidence
High-confidence workforce geography evidence
Workforce geography spans 5 locations across 7 visible profile signals, with reachable evidence across 5 locations and company-domain evidence across 2 locations. Top workforce hub matches company location.
Contactable workforce locations
5
Workforce locations represented by visible contact samples.
Top contactable workforce location
New Haven, Connecticut, United States
Visible contact samples span 5 workforce locations, led by New Haven, Connecticut, United States.
Workforce seniority tiers
5
Seniority bands derived from visible profile titles and levels.
Seniority evidence confidence
High-confidence seniority evidence
Seniority graph spans 8 classified profile signals across 5 tiers, with reachable evidence for 6 and company-domain evidence for 2. Balanced management-to-IC sample.
Classified seniority profiles
8
Visible profiles with usable seniority signals.
Official-domain seniority profiles
Multi-profile official-domain seniority evidence
2 seniority-classified profiles across 2 tiers include company-domain email signals.
Management-to-IC proxy
Balanced management-to-IC sample
4 managerial seniority signals and 4 contributor signals appear in the visible seniority-classified sample.
Role title diversity
Diverse role title sample
8 distinct role titles across 8 visible titled profiles.
Visible role titles
8
Distinct role titles found in visible profile signals.
Business function mix
Multi-function workforce sample
AeroLeads maps 3 visible profile signals into 3 business functions; 3 include visible contact data.
Mapped business functions
3
Business functions inferred from visible profile titles and departments.
Functional team estimates
Engineering team estimate
AeroLeads derives 1 visible engineering team profile signal from mapped business-function signals.
Functional coverage gaps
Partial function coverage map
Visible people signals cover 2 of 8 core business functions. Not observed in the visible graph: Sales / revenue, Marketing / growth, Product / design, and People / HR. Treat this as a coverage gap, not confirmed absence.
Contactable role titles
6
Distinct role titles with visible contact samples.
Contactable role coverage
Diverse contactable role coverage
6 reachable role titles across 6 contactable titled profiles.
Decision-maker signals
5
Visible profiles matching seniority or leadership title patterns.
Decision-maker reachability
High decision-maker reachability
Most mapped decision-maker signals include visible contact data.
Buying committee evidence confidence
Reachable buying committee
2 of 2 mapped buying-committee functions include visible decision-maker contact data.
Buyer persona availability
Dual-persona buyer availability
Mapped decision-maker evidence covers Legal / compliance buyer and Operations buyer; 2 of 2 buyer personas include visible contact data.
Decision-maker contactability rate
100
Percent of mapped decision-maker signals with visible contact data.
Official-domain decision-maker coverage
Partial official-domain decision-maker coverage
Some contactable decision-maker signals use ctoca.org email coverage.
Official-domain decision-maker contacts
2
Contactable decision-maker signals with official-domain email coverage.
Best covered outreach path
General + Director
Coverage combines 2 visible General contact signals, 3 contactable Director decision-maker signals, and 2 official-domain decision-maker email signals.
Prospecting fit
Strong prospecting fit
Open Communities Alliance shows strong prospecting fit based on person-level contact coverage, best covered outreach path, decision-maker coverage, and technology workforce evidence.
ICP fit
Strong ICP fit
Open Communities Alliance matches the strong ICP fit band for common outbound filters based on company size, market specificity, contactability, buying committee, and technology path.
Account research checklist
Multi-step account research checklist
Account research checklist combines best covered outreach path, buying-committee coverage, ICP fit, technology workforce evidence, related-company graph, and domain trust; raw contact values are hidden.
Intelligence signal groups
26
AeroLeads signal groups available for this company.

Market focus signals

Primary industry
Civic and Social Organizations
Market specificity
Tagged market profile
2 category and specialty signals in the company record.
Market evidence tier
High-confidence market evidence
Market evidence combines 7 classification signals from categories, specialties, related peer industries, and description keywords. 6 description-backed keyword signals are included.
Industry benchmark
Peer-informed industry benchmark
Industry benchmark uses 10 related companies, 3 benchmark dimensions, and 3 peer evidence types from the AeroLeads related-company graph.
Top peer industry
Legal Services
30% of 10 related peer industry signals.
Peer benchmark evidence
Multi-signal peer benchmark evidence
Peer benchmark combines 10 related companies with peer graph strength, size benchmark, and size position. Underlying peer graph includes 3 evidence types: employee benchmarks, website records, social profiles.
Size position
Smaller than most related peers
6 of 9 related employee-estimated peers are higher.
Peer graph strength
Partial peer evidence graph
Related peer graph has employee benchmarks, website records, and social profiles across 10 related companies.
Benchmark dimensions: peer graph strength, size benchmark, and size position.
Categories
Civic and Social Organizations
Specialties
Hartford
Product-market keyword evidence
Description-backed market keywords
Keyword evidence comes from 3 source field groups: Category, Specialty, Description.
Product-market keyword evidence tier: High-confidence product-market keyword evidence. Product-market keyword evidence combines 8 unique market keywords, 3 source field groups, and 6 description-backed keywords (1 category, 1 specialty, and 6 description).
Civic and Social Organizations · Category Hartford · Specialty effective catalyst · Description documenting root causes · Description segregation engaging · Description empowering families exploring · Description best practices educating · Description finally advocating · Description
Related peer industries
Peer-industry evidence tier: High-confidence peer-industry evidence. Peer-industry evidence combines 10 related companies, 5 peer-industry clusters, and top peer industry Legal Services at 30.0%.
Functional coverage gaps
Partial function coverage map
Visible people signals cover 2 of 8 core business functions. Not observed in the visible graph: Sales / revenue, Marketing / growth, Product / design, and People / HR. Treat this as a coverage gap, not confirmed absence.
Transparent function coverage evidence: Function coverage evidence combines observed functions Technology / data and Operations and 6 unobserved core functions in the visible graph.
Legal Services 3 peers
30.0% of related peer industries
Law Practice 2 peers
20.0% of related peer industries
Non-profit Organizations 2 peers
20.0% of related peer industries
Restaurants 1 peer
10.0% of related peer industries
Public Policy Offices 1 peer
10.0% of related peer industries

Company signals

Company signal breadth
Multi-signal company record
Company-level signals include social audience, company maturity, and ownership.
Corroborated company record evidence: Company record evidence combines 3 source-backed company signal types: social audience, company maturity, and ownership.
Social audience
102
Followers in the company source record.
Social audience evidence tier: Limited social-audience evidence. Social audience evidence uses 102 followers from source field social_followers.
Audience density
Low audience density
102 followers against 11 employee estimate, about 9.30 followers per estimated employee.
Audience-density evidence tier: Limited audience-density evidence. Audience-density evidence combines 102 social followers, 11 employee estimate, and 9.30 followers per estimated employee.
Company maturity
Scaling company history
Company source record includes founding year 2013, about 13 years before 2026.
Company maturity evidence tier: Founding-year maturity evidence. Maturity evidence combines founding year 2013, 13 years of company history, and source field founded.
Company ownership
Nonprofit organization record
Company source record includes source type Nonprofit.
Company ownership evidence tier: Structured ownership evidence. Ownership evidence combines source type Nonprofit from structured company source fields.

Workforce composition

Department concentration
Balanced department spread
Mapped workforce signals are spread across 4 departments. 40.0% of mapped department signals are in the largest department.
Department concentration evidence tier: Balanced department concentration evidence. Department concentration evidence combines 4 mapped departments, top department General, and 40.0% top-department share.
Department leadership coverage
Broad department leadership coverage
Leadership signals appear across 3 of 4 mapped departments. Leadership signals represent 80.0% of mapped department signals.
Department leadership evidence tier: Corroborated department leadership evidence. Department leadership evidence combines 4 leadership signals, 3 of 4 mapped departments, and 80.0% leadership density.
Department seniority map
Multi-department seniority map
Visible department samples map 5 seniority-classified profiles across 4 departments and 3 seniority bands.
Department seniority evidence tier: Corroborated department seniority evidence. Department seniority evidence combines 5 seniority-classified profiles, 4 departments, 3 seniority bands, and top cell General + Director with 2 profiles.
General 2 profiles
Director: 2
IT 1 profile
Individual contributor: 1
Legal 1 profile
Director: 1
Operations 1 profile
Manager: 1
4 leadership signals 4 departments with visible contacts
Department leader sample
Department leader sample
4 contactable 2 official-domain

AeroLeads source data includes 4 leadership signals across 3 departments; rows show titles and contact-channel presence only.

Department leader evidence tier: High-confidence department leader evidence. Department leader evidence combines 4 leadership signals, 3 departments, 4 contactable, and 2 official-domain; raw contacts are hidden.

Multi-department official-domain leaders: 2 department leader samples across 2 departments include company-domain email signals.

Leader Department Seniority Channel
Lisa Dabrowski
Operations & Grants Manager at Open Communities Alliance
 Operations Manager Email and phone
Erin Boggs
Executive Director, Open Communities Alliance
 General Director Email
Hugh Bailey
Policy Director, Open Communities Alliance
 General Director Email
Margaret Middleton
Legal Director, Open Communities Alliance
 Legal Director Email and phone
General 2 signals
40.0% of mapped department signals, 2 leadership signals, 2 visible contacts
Legal 1 signals
20.0% of mapped department signals, 1 leadership signals, 1 visible contact
IT 1 signals
20.0% of mapped department signals, 1 visible contact
Operations 1 signals
20.0% of mapped department signals, 1 leadership signals, 1 visible contact

Technology talent signals

1 matched technology role signals, 1 with visible contact data.

Technology evidence tier
Reachable technology evidence
1 matched technology role signal include visible contact data.
High technology reachability 100.0%
Most matched technology role signals include visible contact data.
Technology reachability evidence tier: High technology reachability evidence. Technology reachability evidence combines 1 contactable technology signal, 1 matched technology signal, and 100.0% role contactability.
1 IT department signals
Data / AI 1 profile
100.0% of matched technology role signals
Matched role examples
Policy & Data Analyst at Open Communities Alliance 1

Workforce seniority mix

Aggregated from 8 classified profile signals.

Largest seniority band
Director
3 of 8 classified profile signals, 3 with visible contact data, 1 official-domain.
Multi-profile official-domain seniority evidence: 2 seniority-classified profiles across 2 tiers include company-domain email signals.
High-confidence seniority evidence: Seniority graph spans 8 classified profile signals across 5 tiers, with reachable evidence for 6 and company-domain evidence for 2. Balanced management-to-IC sample.
Management-to-IC proxy
Balanced management-to-IC sample
50.0%
managerial seniority signals
50.0%
contributor seniority signals
4 managerial seniority signals and 4 contributor signals appear in the visible seniority-classified sample.
Management-shape evidence tier: Balanced management-shape evidence. Management-shape evidence combines 8 seniority-classified signals, 4 managerial signals, 50.0% managerial share, and 4 contributor signals.
Director 3 profiles
37.5% of classified seniority signals, 3 with visible contact data, 1 official-domain
Individual contributor 2 profiles
25.0% of classified seniority signals, 1 with visible contact data
Manager 1 profile
12.5% of classified seniority signals, 1 with visible contact data, 1 official-domain
Senior / Lead 1 profile
12.5% of classified seniority signals, 1 with visible contact data
Associate / junior 1 profile
12.5% of classified seniority signals

Workforce geography

Aggregated from 7 visible profile location signals.

Workforce geography evidence
High-confidence workforce geography evidence
Workforce geography spans 5 locations across 7 visible profile signals, with reachable evidence across 5 locations and company-domain evidence across 2 locations. Top workforce hub matches company location.
Distribution signal
Distributed workforce
Visible profile location signals are spread across 5 locations.
Workforce distribution model
Broad distributed workforce model
Visible profile locations are spread across 5 workforce locations, with Hartford, Connecticut, United States as the largest hub at 28%.
Corroborated workforce model evidence: Workforce model evidence combines 7 located profile signals, 5 workforce locations, 5 cities, 1 country, top hub Hartford, Connecticut, United States at 28%, company-location alignment, 5 reachable locations, and 2 company-domain locations.
Locations
5
Countries
1
Top hub share
28%
Workforce location footprint
Multi-city workforce footprint
Visible profile locations span 5 cities across 1 country, led by Hartford.
Cities
5
Countries
1
Company-location alignment
Top workforce hub matches company location
The largest visible workforce location is Hartford, Connecticut, United States, matching the company location Hartford, Connecticut, United States.
Top workforce hub share: 28.6%
Company-location evidence tier: High-confidence company-location alignment evidence. Company-location alignment evidence combines company location Hartford, Connecticut, United States, top workforce hub Hartford, Connecticut, United States, 28.6% top workforce hub share, and locality match.
Contactable location spread
Multi-location contact coverage
Visible contact samples span 5 workforce locations, led by New Haven, Connecticut, United States.
Contactable location evidence tier: High-confidence contactable location evidence. Contactable location evidence combines 6 contactable profile location signals, 5 workforce locations, top contactable hub New Haven, Connecticut, United States at 33.3%, and company-location alignment.
Contactable workforce hub shares company country: The largest contactable workforce location is New Haven, Connecticut, United States, in the same country as company location Hartford, Connecticut, United States. Top contactable hub share: 33.3%.
New Haven, Connecticut, United States 2 contacts
33.3% of contactable location signals
Glenwood Springs, Colorado, United States 1 contact
16.7% of contactable location signals
Glastonbury, Connecticut, United States 1 contact
16.7% of contactable location signals
Oxford, Connecticut, United States 1 contact
16.7% of contactable location signals
Hartford, Connecticut, United States 1 contact
16.7% of contactable location signals
Official-domain location spread
Multi-location official-domain workforce
Company-domain email profile locations span 2 workforce locations, led by Glenwood Springs, Colorado, United States.
2 profiles with ctoca.org email evidence include location signals.
Official-domain location evidence tier: Multi-location official-domain evidence. Official-domain location evidence combines 2 official-domain profile location signals, 2 workforce locations, top official-domain hub Glenwood Springs, Colorado, United States at 50.0%, and company-location alignment.
Official-domain workforce hub shares company country: The largest company-domain email workforce location is Glenwood Springs, Colorado, United States, in the same country as company location Hartford, Connecticut, United States. Top official-domain hub share: 50.0%.
Glenwood Springs, Colorado, United States 1 profile
50.0% of official-domain location signals
Glastonbury, Connecticut, United States 1 profile
50.0% of official-domain location signals
Hartford, Connecticut, United States 2 profiles
28.6% of visible location signals
New Haven, Connecticut, United States 2 profiles
28.6% of visible location signals
Glenwood Springs, Colorado, United States 1 profile
14.3% of visible location signals
Glastonbury, Connecticut, United States 1 profile
14.3% of visible location signals
Oxford, Connecticut, United States 1 profile
14.3% of visible location signals

Decision-maker coverage

5 seniority signals, 5 with visible contact data.

Decision-maker evidence tier
Corroborated decision-maker evidence
Decision-maker evidence covers 5 seniority signals, 5 reachable, and 2 company-domain. Buying committee spans 2 functions.
Account planning snapshot
Multi-signal account planning snapshot
Snapshot combines department reachability, decision-maker coverage, and buying-committee function aggregates.
4 account-planning evidence cards available.
Account planning evidence tier: Multi-source account planning evidence. Account planning evidence combines 4 aggregate account-planning cards, best covered outreach path, 2 reachable buying-committee functions, 2 official-domain decision-maker signals, Director seniority reachability, and General department contactability; raw contacts are hidden.
Best covered path
General + Director
Coverage combines 2 visible General contact signals, 3 contactable Director decision-maker signals, and 2 official-domain decision-maker email signals.
Reachable buying committee
2 of 2 functions
Reachable functions include Legal / compliance and Operations.
Most reachable seniority
Director
3 of 3 signals in this seniority band include visible contact data.
Top reachable team
General
2 visible contact signals in this department sample.
High decision-maker reachability 100.0%
Most mapped decision-maker signals include visible contact data.
Decision-maker reachability evidence tier: High decision-maker reachability evidence. Decision-maker reachability evidence combines 5 contactable decision-maker signals, 5 mapped decision-maker signals, 100.0% contactability, 2 official-domain decision-maker signals, and 3 dual-channel signals.
Email and phone decision-maker coverage: Mapped decision-maker signals include 5 email signals, 3 phone signals, and 3 with both channels.
Buying committee function coverage
Multi-function buying-committee coverage
2 of 2 mapped functions include visible decision-maker contact data.
Single-function official-domain buying committee: 1 of 2 mapped business functions include decision-maker email coverage on ctoca.org.
Reachable buying committee: 2 of 2 mapped buying-committee functions include visible decision-maker contact data.
Buying committee evidence tier: Reachable buying-committee evidence. Buying-committee evidence combines 2 mapped buying-committee functions, 2 contactable functions, 1 official-domain function on ctoca.org, and Legal / compliance and Operations function coverage.
Buyer persona availability: Dual-persona buyer availability. Mapped decision-maker evidence covers Legal / compliance buyer and Operations buyer; 2 of 2 buyer personas include visible contact data. High-confidence buyer persona evidence: Buyer persona evidence combines 2 mapped buyer personas, 2 contactable personas, 1 official-domain persona on ctoca.org, and Legal / compliance buyer and Operations buyer coverage.
Legal / compliance: 1 contactable Operations: 1 contactable
Most reachable seniority
Director
3 of 3 seniority signals include visible contact data.
Seniority reachability evidence tier: Corroborated seniority reachability evidence. Seniority reachability evidence combines 3 contactable Director signals, 3 Director signals, 100.0% tier contactability, 1 official-domain Director signal, and email and phone coverage.
Official-domain decision-maker coverage
Partial official-domain decision-maker coverage
2 contactable decision-maker signals match ctoca.org. Some contactable decision-maker signals use ctoca.org email coverage.
Official-domain decision-maker evidence tier: Partial official-domain decision-maker evidence. Official-domain decision-maker evidence combines 2 official-domain decision-maker signals, 5 contactable decision-maker signals, 40.0% official-domain coverage, and ctoca.org domain match.
Director 3 profiles
60.0% of mapped seniority signals, 3 with visible contact data
Senior / Lead 1 profile
20.0% of mapped seniority signals, 1 with visible contact data
Manager 1 profile
20.0% of mapped seniority signals, 1 with visible contact data

Role and function mix

8 visible titled profiles across 8 distinct role titles.

Title mix
Diverse role title sample
8 distinct role titles across 8 visible titled profiles.
Role-title evidence tier: Diverse role-title evidence. Role-title diversity evidence combines 8 visible titled profiles, 8 distinct role titles, and top title Administrative Coordinator at Open at 12.5%.
Business function mix
Multi-function workforce sample
AeroLeads maps 3 visible profile signals into 3 business functions; 3 include visible contact data.
Business-function evidence tier: Corroborated business-function evidence. Business-function evidence combines 3 mapped function profile signals, 3 business functions, 3 contactable signals, 3 contactable functions, 1 official-domain signal, 1 official-domain function, and top function Legal / compliance at 33.3%.
Full function contactability map 3 / 3 functions
3 of 3 mapped business functions include visible contact data.
Single-function official-domain coverage 1 / 3 functions
1 of 3 mapped business functions include visible email signals matching ctoca.org.
Functional team estimates
Engineering team estimate
AeroLeads derives 1 visible engineering team profile signal from mapped business-function signals.
Mapped functional team evidence: Functional team estimate evidence combines 1 visible engineering team profile signal.
Engineering team estimate 1 profile
33.3% of mapped function signals, 1 with visible contact data; Technology / data
Legal / compliance 1 profile
33.3% of mapped function signals, 1 with visible contact data
Operations 1 profile
33.3% of mapped function signals, 1 with visible contact data
Technology / data 1 profile
33.3% of mapped function signals, 1 with visible contact data
Contactable role coverage
Diverse contactable role coverage
6 reachable role titles across 6 contactable titled profiles.
Contactable role evidence tier: Diverse contactable role evidence. Contactable role evidence combines 6 contactable titled profiles, 6 reachable role titles, and top reachable role Executive Director, Open Communities Alliance at 16.7%.
Role title reachability
Broad role-title reachability
6 of 8 distinct visible role titles include email or phone signals.
Role-title reachability evidence tier: Corroborated role-title reachability evidence. Role-title reachability evidence combines 8 visible role titles, 6 reachable titles, 75.0% title reachability, and 2 official-domain titles.
Multi-title official-domain reachability 2 / 8 titles
2 of 8 distinct visible role titles include email signals matching ctoca.org.
Administrative Coordinator at Open 1 profile
12.5% of visible titled profiles
Entrepreneur - Organizer - Strategist 1 profile
12.5% of visible titled profiles
Executive Director, Open Communities Alliance 1 profile
12.5% of visible titled profiles
Legal Director, Open Communities Alliance 1 profile
12.5% of visible titled profiles
Operations & Grants Manager at Open 1 profile
12.5% of visible titled profiles
Policy & Data Analyst at Open Communities Alliance 1 profile
12.5% of visible titled profiles

Contactability signals

Contactability score 50.0%
2 of 4 visible profiles include email or phone signals.
Contact channel mix
Multi-channel contact coverage
Visible profile or company source data includes email and phone channels.
Contact evidence tier
High-confidence contact evidence
3 current or verified professional email signals, 4 company-domain email signals, and multi-channel contact coverage; raw addresses and numbers are hidden.
Contact data safety
Strong privacy-safe contact intelligence
AeroLeads exposes contact counts, channel mix, freshness, and domain-alignment evidence while hiding raw email addresses and masking phone numbers in public output.
Aggregate signals
6
Channel coverage
Email and phone aggregate coverage
Evidence groups
5
High-confidence contact-safety evidence: Contact-safety evidence combines visible profile contact sample, company email sample, current email metadata, dated contact metadata, and official-domain email evidence; public schema uses aggregate variables only.
Aggregate-only contact schema: Dataset variables use counts, rates, channel labels, freshness bands, and domain-alignment metrics instead of raw contact values.
Best covered outreach path
General + Director
Coverage combines 2 visible General contact signals, 3 contactable Director decision-maker signals, and 2 official-domain decision-maker email signals.
Outreach path evidence tier: Corroborated outreach path evidence. Outreach path evidence combines 2 visible General contact signals, 3 contactable Director decision-maker signals, and 2 official-domain decision-maker email signals; raw contacts are hidden.
Email usability mix
Current email coverage sample
AeroLeads source data includes 14 unique visible email signals; 3 are marked current or verified and 10 are professional-type. Raw addresses are hidden.
Email usability evidence tier: High-confidence email usability evidence. Email usability evidence combines 14 unique email signals, 3 current or verified, 10 professional-type, and 21.4% current signal rate; raw addresses are hidden.
3 current or verified 10 professional-type 21.4% current signal rate
Contact freshness
Dated contact metadata
AeroLeads source data includes 4 dated contact records; 0 fall within 90 days and 0 fall within 12 months of the Jun 2026 source update. Raw emails and phone numbers are hidden.
Contact freshness evidence tier: Dated contact freshness evidence. Contact freshness evidence combines 4 dated contact records, email timestamps, and 4 official-domain dated email records.
4 dated records 0 within 90 days 0.0% fresh rate 0 within 12 months Latest Oct 2021
Dated email metadata: Dated contact records include 4 email records.
Dated official-domain contact metadata: 4 dated official-domain email records; 0 fall within 12 months of the Jun 2026 source update.
Visible people
4
With contact data
2
Email coverage
2
50.0% of visible profiles
Phone coverage
2
50.0% of visible profiles
Company email sample
Limited company email sample
AeroLeads source data includes 4 email records across 1 domain; raw addresses are hidden. 4 match ctoca.org.
Source email evidence tier: Corroborated source email evidence. Source email evidence combines 4 unique source email records, 1 domain, 4 matching ctoca.org, and 100.0% official-domain rate.

Email domain intelligence

4 of 14 visible email signals match ctoca.org.

Mixed-domain coverage: Visible email signals include official-domain and non-official domains.
Email identity evidence tier: Corroborated email identity evidence. Email identity evidence combines 14 visible email signals, 4 matching ctoca.org, 2 people with official-domain email, 28.6% official-domain match, 6 other-domain signals, and 4 personal-domain signals.
28.6% domain match 2 people with official-domain email 10 non-official email signals

Department contact samples

Broad department contact spread: Visible contact samples appear across 4 of 4 mapped departments.
Department contactability evidence tier: High-confidence department contactability evidence. Department contactability evidence combines 5 visible contact samples, 4 of 4 mapped departments, 5 email signals, 2 phone signals, and 2 official-domain email signals; raw contacts are hidden.
Contactability heatmap
Email and phone department contact map
Department samples show 5 email signals and 2 phone signals across 4 contactable departments.
General Email
Email2
Phone0
Legal Email + phone
Email1
Phone1
Operations Email + phone
Email1
Phone1
IT Email
Email1
Phone0
Official-domain department coverage
Multi-department official-domain coverage
2 of 4 mapped departments include visible company-domain email signals.
Department Contacts Email Official email Phone
General 2 2 1 0
Legal 1 1 0 1
Operations 1 1 1 1
IT 1 1 0 0
Top email pattern: flast at 80.0% of matched patterns.
Format example: [first_initial][last]@ctoca.org
Dominant pattern: One email pattern accounts for most matched examples.
Email pattern evidence tier: High-confidence email pattern evidence. Email pattern evidence combines 2 matched patterns, 80.0% top-pattern share, format example for ctoca.org, and secondary pattern variants.
flast 80.0%
first.last 20.0%

Explore related pages

Open Communities Alliance email format Open Communities Alliance management graph and contactability signals

Related company intelligence:

2 of 4 visible Open Communities Alliance profiles include email or phone signals. Review people graph
The strongest Open Communities Alliance email pattern signal is [first_initial][last] , representing 80.0% of matched email-pattern evidence in the AeroLeads company graph.
Other observed email-pattern signals for Open Communities Alliance are [first].[last] .
In total, AeroLeads has detected 2 aggregate email-pattern signals for Open Communities Alliance. View the detailed email format page .

Open Communities Alliance Email Pattern Intelligence Snapshot

These aggregate patterns support the company intelligence page. The dedicated email-format workflow lives on Open Communities Alliance email format .

Observed pattern
Example pattern
[first_initial][last]
[first_initial][last]@ctoca.org
80%
[first].[last]
[first].[last]@ctoca.org
20%

Open Communities Alliance Questions

Open Communities Alliance people graph sample