Team Physical Therapy Inc

Team Physical Therapy Inc Intelligence, Employees & Contact Signals

Contact coverage
Email + phone
Visible profile or company source data includes email and phone channels. 3 visible profiles include direct contact evidence.
People graph depth
12 signals
Deep profile graph across 2 mapped departments.
Account research
6 steps
Account research checklist combines best covered outreach path, buying-committee coverage, ICP fit, related-company graph, domain trust, and people graph depth; raw contact values are hidden.
Outreach path
General + Executive
Coverage combines 3 visible General contact signals, 1 contactable Executive decision-maker signal, and 1 official-domain decision-maker email signal.
Evidence quality 100/100 Priority intelligence record

AeroLeads company intelligence

Team Physical Therapy Inc workforce and contactability signals

Evidence from AeroLeads company records, matched professional profiles, and related company graph.

High confidence
Intelligence completeness
Strong intelligence record
7 of 11 major intelligence groups are available for this company.
Largest mapped team
Executive
2 profile signals in Executive.
Departments mapped
2
Workforce composition from AeroLeads profile data.
Profile graph
Deep profile graph
12 mapped workforce signals against a 38 employee size estimate.
Top reachable team
General
3 visible contact signals.
Top seniority band
Individual contributor
8 of 13 classified profile signals.
Visible contact sample
3
Displayed people with email or phone data.

Profile graph researchability

Visible people graph includes 13 visible people: 13 named, 13 titled, 13 located, and 7 contactable.

Multi-signal profile graph
Profile coverage evidence tier: Deep profile coverage evidence. Profile coverage evidence combines 12 mapped workforce signals, 38 employee size estimate, and 31.6% profile graph coverage.
High-confidence profile graph evidence: Researchability is based on 13 visible people with 4 populated evidence dimensions: named, titled, located, and contactable signals.
Profile association confidence: High-confidence profile association. Association confidence combines 13 titled profiles, 4 official-domain email profiles, 4 titled profiles with official-domain email, 4 located profiles with official-domain email, and 7 contactable profiles.
People
13
Named
13
Titled
13
Located
13
Contactable
7

Data methodology

AeroLeads renders only source-backed fields for this company page.

5 source groups
Company record Matched profile graph Email-pattern aggregate Related company graph Company signal fields
Blank source fields are omitted
Related companies are ordered deterministically
Structured data uses aggregate counts only

Intelligence completeness

7 of 11 major intelligence groups are available for this company.

7 / 11 groups
Strong intelligence record 63.6%
Workforce composition Contactability Email intelligence Decision makers Buying committee Domain confidence Market and peer context

Evidence quality

This page clears the 60+ AeroLeads company-intelligence evidence threshold.

100 / 100
Priority intelligence record Threshold 60+
Workforce composition Employee email coverage Employee phone coverage Department contactability Department contactability heatmap Official-domain department contactability
Workforce graph
31 signals
Workforce composition, Department contactability, Department contactability heatmap
Contactability
18 signals
Employee email coverage, Employee phone coverage, Email pattern intelligence
Decision-maker intelligence
13 signals
Decision-maker coverage, Leadership signals, Department leadership coverage
Market and peer context
14 signals
Related company graph, Peer graph strength, Peer position benchmark
Company momentum
3 signals
Company signal breadth, Company momentum score, Company ownership signal
Source trust
11 signals
Domain confidence, Multi-source domain alignment, Intelligence completeness
84 additional source-backed evidence signals are counted in this page quality score.

Prospecting readiness

Team Physical Therapy Inc shows strong prospecting fit based on person-level contact coverage, best covered outreach path, decision-maker coverage, and people graph depth.

75 / 100
Strong prospecting fit High-confidence prospecting evidence

Prospecting evidence combines person-level contact coverage, best covered outreach path, decision-maker coverage, people graph depth, and peer context; raw contact values are hidden.

ICP fit
Strong ICP fit

ICP fit combines company size, market specificity, contactability, buying committee, and domain trust; raw contact values are hidden.

80 / 100
Company size
38 employees
Employee estimate is in a common outbound prospecting range.
Market specificity
Tagged market profile
2 category and specialty signals in the company record.
Reachability
High-confidence contact evidence
6 current or verified professional email signals, 3 company-domain email signals, and multi-channel contact coverage; raw addresses and numbers are hidden.
Buying committee
Mapped buying committee
Mapped decision-maker signals span 1 business function.
Domain trust
High-confidence domain alignment
Domain evidence combines website domain, social profile, employee email alignment, profile-domain association, and company email sample; raw email addresses are hidden.
Account research checklist
Multi-step account research checklist

Account research checklist combines best covered outreach path, buying-committee coverage, ICP fit, related-company graph, domain trust, and people graph depth; raw contact values are hidden.

6 steps
Confirm contact path
General + Executive
Outreach path evidence combines 3 visible General contact signals, 1 contactable Executive decision-maker signal, and 1 official-domain decision-maker email signal; raw contacts are hidden.
Map reachable buying committee
Mapped buying committee
Buying-committee evidence combines 1 mapped buying-committee function, 1 contactable function, 1 official-domain function on teampt.com, and Executive / corporate function coverage.
Validate ICP fit
Strong ICP fit
ICP fit combines company size, market specificity, contactability, buying committee, and domain trust; raw contact values are hidden.
Compare related peers
Limited peer comparison
Compares this company with related-company evidence across employee scale and peer graph evidence.
Check domain trust
High-confidence domain alignment
Domain evidence combines website domain, social profile, employee email alignment, profile-domain association, and company email sample; raw email addresses are hidden.
Review people graph depth
Deep profile graph
12 mapped workforce signals against a 38 employee size estimate.
Contact coverage
High-confidence contact evidence
6 current or verified professional email signals, 3 company-domain email signals, and multi-channel contact coverage; raw addresses and numbers are hidden.
Best outreach path
General + Executive
Coverage combines 3 visible General contact signals, 1 contactable Executive decision-maker signal, and 1 official-domain decision-maker email signal.
Decision-maker coverage
Mapped buying committee
Mapped decision-maker signals span 1 business function.
People graph depth
Deep profile graph
12 mapped workforce signals against a 38 employee size estimate.

Domain trust signals

Domain confidence for teampt.com is based on website domain, social profile, employee email alignment, profile-domain association, and company email sample.

100 / 100
High-confidence domain alignment High-confidence domain evidence

Domain evidence combines website domain, social profile, employee email alignment, profile-domain association, and company email sample; raw email addresses are hidden.

Website domain
teampt.com
The official website domain is available from the company source record.
Social profile
LinkedIn organization page
A LinkedIn organization page is present for this company record.
Employee email alignment
5 official-domain email signals
45% of visible employee email signals match teampt.com; raw addresses are hidden.
Profile-domain association
4 people with official-domain email
Matched people include official-domain email evidence; raw addresses are hidden.
Company email sample
3 official-domain source email records
Company-level email source records include official-domain coverage; raw addresses are hidden.

AeroLeads coverage snapshot

Profile sample
4
Visible people attached to this company page.
Profile graph depth
Deep profile graph
12 mapped workforce signals against a 38 employee size estimate.
Contactable sample
3
Visible people with email or phone data.
Contact channel mix
Multi-channel contact coverage
Visible profile or company source data includes email and phone channels.
Contact evidence confidence
High-confidence contact evidence
6 current or verified professional email signals, 3 company-domain email signals, and multi-channel contact coverage; raw addresses and numbers are hidden.
Company support channels
Email and phone
Company record includes support email and phone contact channels.
Department coverage
2
Departments represented in AeroLeads workforce signals.
Department concentration
Department-concentrated workforce
Most mapped workforce signals are in General.
Leadership signals
2
Department lead or leadership signals in the org data.
Department leader sample
Limited department leader sample
AeroLeads source data includes 2 leadership signals across 1 department; rows show titles and contact-channel presence only.
Official-domain department leaders
Official-domain leader evidence
1 department leader sample across 1 department includes company-domain email signals.
Department leadership coverage
Focused department leadership coverage
Leadership signals appear in 1 of 2 mapped departments.
Leadership density
16.70
Percent of mapped department signals that are leadership signals.
Department contact coverage
2
Departments with visible contact samples.
Department contact spread
Broad department contact spread
Visible contact samples appear across 2 of 2 mapped departments.
Department contactability heatmap
Email and phone department contact map
Department samples show 4 email signals and 1 phone signal across 2 contactable departments.
Official-domain department contactability
Full official-domain department coverage
2 of 2 mapped departments include visible company-domain email signals.
Department seniority map
Two-department seniority map
Visible department samples map 9 seniority-classified profiles across 2 departments and 3 seniority bands.
Email-pattern variants
2
Distinct matched business email patterns.
Official-domain emails
5
Email signals matching teampt.com.
Email domain confidence
Mixed-domain coverage
Visible email signals include official-domain and non-official domains.
Domain confidence
High-confidence domain alignment
Domain confidence for teampt.com is based on website domain, social profile, employee email alignment, profile-domain association, and company email sample.
Email usability mix
Current email coverage sample
AeroLeads source data includes 11 unique visible email signals; 6 are marked current or verified and 9 are professional-type. Raw addresses are hidden.
Contact freshness
Dated contact metadata
AeroLeads source data includes 3 dated contact records; 0 fall within 90 days and 0 fall within 12 months of the Jun 2026 source update. Raw emails and phone numbers are hidden.
Contact data safety
Strong privacy-safe contact intelligence
AeroLeads exposes contact counts, channel mix, freshness, and domain-alignment evidence while hiding raw email addresses and masking phone numbers in public output.
Official-domain contact freshness
Dated official-domain contact metadata
3 dated official-domain email records; 0 fall within 12 months of the Jun 2026 source update.
Company signal breadth
Multi-signal company record
Company-level signals include social audience, company maturity, and ownership.
Company momentum score
Limited company momentum score
Momentum score blends contactability and peer position from AeroLeads company and profile evidence.
Company ownership signal
Private company record
Company source record includes source type Privately Held.
Audience density
Low audience density
70 followers against 38 employee estimate, about 1.80 followers per estimated employee.
Specialty signals
1
Specialty tags in the company record.
Market specificity
Tagged market profile
2 category and specialty signals in the company record.
Peer industry clusters
2
Industries represented by related company records.
Related companies
10
Company graph links available for comparison.
Industry benchmark
Evidence-backed industry benchmark
Industry benchmark uses 10 related companies, 9 same-industry peers, 3 benchmark dimensions, and 4 peer evidence types from the AeroLeads related-company graph.
Peer benchmark confidence
Multi-signal peer benchmark evidence
Peer benchmark combines 10 related companies with peer graph strength, size benchmark, and size position. Underlying peer graph includes 4 evidence types: industry context, employee benchmarks, website records, social profiles.
Peer position benchmark
Employee-scale peer position benchmark
Peer-position benchmark shows employee scale above 66.7% of 9 comparable related peers.
Peer comparison matrix
Limited peer comparison
Compares this company with related-company evidence across employee scale and peer graph evidence.
Workforce locations
10
Locations represented in visible profile signals.
Workforce distribution
Distributed workforce
Visible profile location signals are spread across 10 locations.
Workforce location footprint
Multi-city workforce footprint
Visible profile locations span 10 cities across 1 country, led by Rancho Cucamonga.
Workforce distribution model
Broad distributed workforce model
Visible profile locations are spread across 10 workforce locations, with Rancho Cucamonga, California, United States as the largest hub at 23%.
Workforce geography evidence confidence
High-confidence workforce geography evidence
Workforce geography spans 10 locations across 13 visible profile signals, with reachable evidence across 6 locations and company-domain evidence across 3 locations. Top workforce hub matches company location.
Contactable workforce locations
6
Workforce locations represented by visible contact samples.
Top contactable workforce location
Los Angeles Metropolitan Area, United States
Visible contact samples span 6 workforce locations, led by Los Angeles Metropolitan Area, United States.
Workforce seniority tiers
3
Seniority bands derived from visible profile titles and levels.
Seniority evidence confidence
High-confidence seniority evidence
Seniority graph spans 13 classified profile signals across 3 tiers, with reachable evidence for 7 and company-domain evidence for 4. Contributor-heavy visible sample.
Classified seniority profiles
13
Visible profiles with usable seniority signals.
Official-domain seniority profiles
Multi-profile official-domain seniority evidence
4 seniority-classified profiles across 3 tiers include company-domain email signals.
Management-to-IC proxy
Contributor-heavy visible sample
2 managerial seniority signals and 11 contributor signals appear in the visible seniority-classified sample.
Role title diversity
Diverse role title sample
13 distinct role titles across 13 visible titled profiles.
Visible role titles
13
Distinct role titles found in visible profile signals.
Contactable role titles
7
Distinct role titles with visible contact samples.
Contactable role coverage
Diverse contactable role coverage
7 reachable role titles across 7 contactable titled profiles.
Decision-maker signals
2
Visible profiles matching seniority or leadership title patterns.
Decision-maker reachability
Partial decision-maker reachability
Some mapped decision-maker signals include visible contact data.
Buying committee evidence confidence
Mapped buying committee
Mapped decision-maker signals span 1 business function.
Buyer persona availability
Single-persona buyer availability
Mapped decision-maker evidence covers Executive buyer; 1 of 1 buyer persona include visible contact data.
Decision-maker contactability rate
50
Percent of mapped decision-maker signals with visible contact data.
Official-domain decision-maker coverage
Strong official-domain decision-maker coverage
Most contactable decision-maker signals use teampt.com email coverage.
Official-domain decision-maker contacts
1
Contactable decision-maker signals with official-domain email coverage.
Best covered outreach path
General + Executive
Coverage combines 3 visible General contact signals, 1 contactable Executive decision-maker signal, and 1 official-domain decision-maker email signal.
Prospecting fit
Strong prospecting fit
Team Physical Therapy Inc shows strong prospecting fit based on person-level contact coverage, best covered outreach path, decision-maker coverage, and people graph depth.
ICP fit
Strong ICP fit
Team Physical Therapy Inc matches the strong ICP fit band for common outbound filters based on company size, market specificity, contactability, buying committee, and domain trust.
Account research checklist
Multi-step account research checklist
Account research checklist combines best covered outreach path, buying-committee coverage, ICP fit, related-company graph, domain trust, and people graph depth; raw contact values are hidden.
Intelligence signal groups
25
AeroLeads signal groups available for this company.

Market focus signals

Primary industry
Hospitals and Health Care
Market specificity
Tagged market profile
2 category and specialty signals in the company record.
Market evidence tier
Corroborated market evidence
Market evidence combines 4 classification signals from categories, specialties, related peer industries, and description keywords. 2 description-backed keyword signals are included.
Industry benchmark
Evidence-backed industry benchmark
Industry benchmark uses 10 related companies, 9 same-industry peers, 3 benchmark dimensions, and 4 peer evidence types from the AeroLeads related-company graph.
Top peer industry
Hospitals and Health Care
90% of 10 related peer industry signals.
Peer benchmark evidence
Multi-signal peer benchmark evidence
Peer benchmark combines 10 related companies with peer graph strength, size benchmark, and size position. Underlying peer graph includes 4 evidence types: industry context, employee benchmarks, website records, social profiles.
Size position
Larger than most related peers
6 of 9 related employee-estimated peers are lower.
Peer graph strength
Benchmark-ready peer graph
Related peer graph has industry context, employee benchmarks, website records, and social profiles across 10 related companies.
Benchmark dimensions: peer graph strength, size benchmark, and size position.
Categories
Hospitals and Health Care
Specialties
Hospitals and Health Care
Product-market keyword evidence
Limited market keywords
Keyword evidence comes from 2 source field groups: Category, Description.
Product-market keyword evidence tier: Limited product-market keyword evidence. Product-market keyword evidence combines 3 unique market keywords, 2 source field groups, and 2 description-backed keywords (1 category and 2 description).
Hospitals and Health Care · Category rancho cucamonga · Description united states · Description
Related peer industries
Peer-industry evidence tier: High-confidence peer-industry evidence. Peer-industry evidence combines 10 related companies, 2 peer-industry clusters, and top peer industry Hospitals and Health Care at 90.0%.
Hospitals and Health Care 9 peers
90.0% of related peer industries
Medical Practices 1 peer
10.0% of related peer industries

Company signals

Company signal breadth
Multi-signal company record
Company-level signals include social audience, company maturity, and ownership.
Corroborated company record evidence: Company record evidence combines 3 source-backed company signal types: social audience, company maturity, and ownership.
Social audience
70
Followers in the company source record.
Social audience evidence tier: Limited social-audience evidence. Social audience evidence uses 70 followers from source field social_followers.
Audience density
Low audience density
70 followers against 38 employee estimate, about 1.80 followers per estimated employee.
Audience-density evidence tier: Limited audience-density evidence. Audience-density evidence combines 70 social followers, 38 employee estimate, and 1.80 followers per estimated employee.
Company maturity
Mature company record
Company source record includes founding year 2001, about 25 years before 2026.
Company maturity evidence tier: Long-running maturity evidence. Maturity evidence combines founding year 2001, 25 years of company history, and source field founded.
Company ownership
Private company record
Company source record includes source type Privately Held.
Company ownership evidence tier: Structured ownership evidence. Ownership evidence combines source type Privately Held from structured company source fields.

Workforce composition

Department concentration
Department-concentrated workforce
Most mapped workforce signals are in General. 83.3% of mapped department signals are in the largest department.
Department concentration evidence tier: Concentrated department evidence. Department concentration evidence combines 2 mapped departments, top department General, and 83.3% top-department share.
Department leadership coverage
Focused department leadership coverage
Leadership signals appear in 1 of 2 mapped departments. Leadership signals represent 16.7% of mapped department signals.
Department leadership evidence tier: Limited department leadership evidence. Department leadership evidence combines 2 leadership signals, 1 of 2 mapped departments, and 16.7% leadership density.
Department seniority map
Two-department seniority map
Visible department samples map 9 seniority-classified profiles across 2 departments and 3 seniority bands.
Department seniority evidence tier: Corroborated department seniority evidence. Department seniority evidence combines 9 seniority-classified profiles, 2 departments, 3 seniority bands, and top cell General + Individual contributor with 5 profiles.
General 7 profiles
Individual contributor: 5 Associate / junior: 2
Executive 2 profiles
Executive: 2
2 leadership signals 2 departments with visible contacts
Department leader sample
Limited department leader sample
1 contactable 1 official-domain

AeroLeads source data includes 2 leadership signals across 1 department; rows show titles and contact-channel presence only.

Department leader evidence tier: Limited department leader evidence. Department leader evidence combines 2 leadership signals, 1 department, 1 contactable, and 1 official-domain; raw contacts are hidden.

Official-domain leader evidence: 1 department leader sample across 1 department includes company-domain email signals.

Leader Department Seniority Channel
Gina Bekendam
Owner at Team Physical Therapy Inc
 Executive Executive Email and phone
Gina Bekendam
Business Owner
 Executive Executive No visible contact channel
General 10 signals
83.3% of mapped department signals, 3 visible contacts
Executive 2 signals
16.7% of mapped department signals, 2 leadership signals, 1 visible contact

Workforce seniority mix

Aggregated from 13 classified profile signals.

Largest seniority band
Individual contributor
8 of 13 classified profile signals, 5 with visible contact data, 2 official-domain.
Multi-profile official-domain seniority evidence: 4 seniority-classified profiles across 3 tiers include company-domain email signals.
High-confidence seniority evidence: Seniority graph spans 13 classified profile signals across 3 tiers, with reachable evidence for 7 and company-domain evidence for 4. Contributor-heavy visible sample.
Management-to-IC proxy
Contributor-heavy visible sample
15.4%
managerial seniority signals
84.6%
contributor seniority signals
2 managerial seniority signals and 11 contributor signals appear in the visible seniority-classified sample.
Management-shape evidence tier: Contributor-heavy management-shape evidence. Management-shape evidence combines 13 seniority-classified signals, 2 managerial signals, 15.4% managerial share, and 11 contributor signals.
Individual contributor 8 profiles
61.5% of classified seniority signals, 5 with visible contact data, 2 official-domain
Associate / junior 3 profiles
23.1% of classified seniority signals, 1 with visible contact data, 1 official-domain
Executive 2 profiles
15.4% of classified seniority signals, 1 with visible contact data, 1 official-domain

Workforce geography

Aggregated from 13 visible profile location signals.

Workforce geography evidence
High-confidence workforce geography evidence
Workforce geography spans 10 locations across 13 visible profile signals, with reachable evidence across 6 locations and company-domain evidence across 3 locations. Top workforce hub matches company location.
Distribution signal
Distributed workforce
Visible profile location signals are spread across 10 locations.
Workforce distribution model
Broad distributed workforce model
Visible profile locations are spread across 10 workforce locations, with Rancho Cucamonga, California, United States as the largest hub at 23%.
Corroborated workforce model evidence: Workforce model evidence combines 13 located profile signals, 10 workforce locations, 10 cities, 1 country, top hub Rancho Cucamonga, California, United States at 23%, company-location alignment, 6 reachable locations, and 3 company-domain locations.
Locations
10
Countries
1
Top hub share
23%
Workforce location footprint
Multi-city workforce footprint
Visible profile locations span 10 cities across 1 country, led by Rancho Cucamonga.
Cities
10
Countries
1
Company-location alignment
Top workforce hub matches company location
The largest visible workforce location is Rancho Cucamonga, California, United States, matching the company location Rancho Cucamonga, California, United States.
Top workforce hub share: 23.1%
Company-location evidence tier: High-confidence company-location alignment evidence. Company-location alignment evidence combines company location Rancho Cucamonga, California, United States, top workforce hub Rancho Cucamonga, California, United States, 23.1% top workforce hub share, and locality match.
Contactable location spread
Multi-location contact coverage
Visible contact samples span 6 workforce locations, led by Los Angeles Metropolitan Area, United States.
Contactable location evidence tier: High-confidence contactable location evidence. Contactable location evidence combines 7 contactable profile location signals, 6 workforce locations, top contactable hub Los Angeles Metropolitan Area, United States at 28.6%, and company-location alignment.
Contactable workforce hub shares company country: The largest contactable workforce location is Los Angeles Metropolitan Area, United States, in the same country as company location Rancho Cucamonga, California, United States. Top contactable hub share: 28.6%.
Los Angeles Metropolitan Area, United States 2 contacts
28.6% of contactable location signals
Fontana, California, United States 1 contact
14.3% of contactable location signals
West Springfield, Massachusetts, United States 1 contact
14.3% of contactable location signals
Upland, California, United States 1 contact
14.3% of contactable location signals
Lincoln, Nebraska Metropolitan Area, United States 1 contact
14.3% of contactable location signals
Official-domain location spread
Multi-location official-domain workforce
Company-domain email profile locations span 3 workforce locations, led by Los Angeles Metropolitan Area, United States.
4 profiles with teampt.com email evidence include location signals.
Official-domain location evidence tier: High-confidence official-domain location evidence. Official-domain location evidence combines 4 official-domain profile location signals, 3 workforce locations, top official-domain hub Los Angeles Metropolitan Area, United States at 50.0%, and company-location alignment.
Official-domain workforce hub shares company country: The largest company-domain email workforce location is Los Angeles Metropolitan Area, United States, in the same country as company location Rancho Cucamonga, California, United States. Top official-domain hub share: 50.0%.
Los Angeles Metropolitan Area, United States 2 profiles
50.0% of official-domain location signals
Fontana, California, United States 1 profile
25.0% of official-domain location signals
Lincoln, Nebraska Metropolitan Area, United States 1 profile
25.0% of official-domain location signals
Rancho Cucamonga, California, United States 3 profiles
23.1% of visible location signals
Los Angeles Metropolitan Area, United States 2 profiles
15.4% of visible location signals
Fontana, California, United States 1 profile
7.7% of visible location signals
West Springfield, Massachusetts, United States 1 profile
7.7% of visible location signals
Riverside, California, United States 1 profile
7.7% of visible location signals
Upland, California, United States 1 profile
7.7% of visible location signals

Decision-maker coverage

2 seniority signals, 1 with visible contact data.

Decision-maker evidence tier
Mapped decision-maker evidence
Decision-maker evidence covers 2 seniority signals, 1 reachable, and 1 company-domain. Buying committee spans 1 function.
Account planning snapshot
Multi-signal account planning snapshot
Snapshot combines department reachability, decision-maker coverage, and buying-committee function aggregates.
4 account-planning evidence cards available.
Account planning evidence tier: Multi-source account planning evidence. Account planning evidence combines 4 aggregate account-planning cards, best covered outreach path, 1 reachable buying-committee function, 1 official-domain decision-maker signal, Executive seniority reachability, and General department contactability; raw contacts are hidden.
Best covered path
General + Executive
Coverage combines 3 visible General contact signals, 1 contactable Executive decision-maker signal, and 1 official-domain decision-maker email signal.
Reachable buying committee
1 of 1 functions
Reachable functions include Executive / corporate.
Most reachable seniority
Executive
1 of 2 signals in this seniority band include visible contact data.
Top reachable team
General
3 visible contact signals in this department sample.
Partial decision-maker reachability 50.0%
Some mapped decision-maker signals include visible contact data.
Decision-maker reachability evidence tier: Partial decision-maker reachability evidence. Decision-maker reachability evidence combines 1 contactable decision-maker signal, 2 mapped decision-maker signals, 50.0% contactability, 1 official-domain decision-maker signal, and 1 dual-channel signal.
Email and phone decision-maker coverage: Mapped decision-maker signals include 1 email signal, 1 phone signal, and 1 with both channels.
Buying committee function coverage
Single-function buying-committee coverage
1 of 1 mapped functions include visible decision-maker contact data.
Single-function official-domain buying committee: 1 of 1 mapped business function include decision-maker email coverage on teampt.com.
Mapped buying committee: Mapped decision-maker signals span 1 business function.
Buying committee evidence tier: Mapped buying-committee evidence. Buying-committee evidence combines 1 mapped buying-committee function, 1 contactable function, 1 official-domain function on teampt.com, and Executive / corporate function coverage.
Buyer persona availability: Single-persona buyer availability. Mapped decision-maker evidence covers Executive buyer; 1 of 1 buyer persona include visible contact data. Reachable buyer persona evidence: Buyer persona evidence combines 1 mapped buyer persona, 1 contactable persona, 1 official-domain persona on teampt.com, and Executive buyer coverage.
Executive / corporate: 1 contactable
Most reachable seniority
Executive
1 of 2 seniority signals include visible contact data.
Seniority reachability evidence tier: Mapped seniority reachability evidence. Seniority reachability evidence combines 1 contactable Executive signal, 2 Executive signals, 50.0% tier contactability, 1 official-domain Executive signal, and email and phone coverage.
Official-domain decision-maker coverage
Strong official-domain decision-maker coverage
1 contactable decision-maker signals match teampt.com. Most contactable decision-maker signals use teampt.com email coverage.
Official-domain decision-maker evidence tier: Strong official-domain decision-maker evidence. Official-domain decision-maker evidence combines 1 official-domain decision-maker signal, 1 contactable decision-maker signal, 100.0% official-domain coverage, and teampt.com domain match.
Executive 2 profiles
100.0% of mapped seniority signals, 1 with visible contact data

Role and function mix

13 visible titled profiles across 13 distinct role titles.

Title mix
Diverse role title sample
13 distinct role titles across 13 visible titled profiles.
Role-title evidence tier: Diverse role-title evidence. Role-title diversity evidence combines 13 visible titled profiles, 13 distinct role titles, and top title Assistant at Team Physical Therapy at 7.7%.
Contactable role coverage
Diverse contactable role coverage
7 reachable role titles across 7 contactable titled profiles.
Contactable role evidence tier: Diverse contactable role evidence. Contactable role evidence combines 7 contactable titled profiles, 7 reachable role titles, and top reachable role Billing Assistant at Team Physical Therapy at 14.3%.
Role title reachability
Broad role-title reachability
7 of 13 distinct visible role titles include email or phone signals.
Role-title reachability evidence tier: Corroborated role-title reachability evidence. Role-title reachability evidence combines 13 visible role titles, 7 reachable titles, 53.8% title reachability, and 4 official-domain titles.
Multi-title official-domain reachability 4 / 13 titles
4 of 13 distinct visible role titles include email signals matching teampt.com.
Assistant at Team Physical Therapy 1 profile
7.7% of visible titled profiles
Billing Assistant at Team Physical Therapy 1 profile
7.7% of visible titled profiles
Billing Clerk 1 profile
7.7% of visible titled profiles
Business Owner 1 profile
7.7% of visible titled profiles
Front Desk Attendant 1 profile
7.7% of visible titled profiles
Grad Student of Occupational Therapy 1 profile
7.7% of visible titled profiles

Contactability signals

Contactability score 75.0%
3 of 4 visible profiles include email or phone signals.
Contact channel mix
Multi-channel contact coverage
Visible profile or company source data includes email and phone channels.
Contact evidence tier
High-confidence contact evidence
6 current or verified professional email signals, 3 company-domain email signals, and multi-channel contact coverage; raw addresses and numbers are hidden.
Contact data safety
Strong privacy-safe contact intelligence
AeroLeads exposes contact counts, channel mix, freshness, and domain-alignment evidence while hiding raw email addresses and masking phone numbers in public output.
Aggregate signals
8
Channel coverage
Email and phone aggregate coverage
Evidence groups
6
High-confidence contact-safety evidence: Contact-safety evidence combines visible profile contact sample, company email sample, support channels, current email metadata, dated contact metadata, and official-domain email evidence; public schema uses aggregate variables only.
Aggregate-only contact schema: Dataset variables use counts, rates, channel labels, freshness bands, and domain-alignment metrics instead of raw contact values.
Best covered outreach path
General + Executive
Coverage combines 3 visible General contact signals, 1 contactable Executive decision-maker signal, and 1 official-domain decision-maker email signal.
Outreach path evidence tier: Corroborated outreach path evidence. Outreach path evidence combines 3 visible General contact signals, 1 contactable Executive decision-maker signal, and 1 official-domain decision-maker email signal; raw contacts are hidden.
Email usability mix
Current email coverage sample
AeroLeads source data includes 11 unique visible email signals; 6 are marked current or verified and 9 are professional-type. Raw addresses are hidden.
Email usability evidence tier: High-confidence email usability evidence. Email usability evidence combines 11 unique email signals, 6 current or verified, 9 professional-type, and 54.5% current signal rate; raw addresses are hidden.
6 current or verified 9 professional-type 54.5% current signal rate
Contact freshness
Dated contact metadata
AeroLeads source data includes 3 dated contact records; 0 fall within 90 days and 0 fall within 12 months of the Jun 2026 source update. Raw emails and phone numbers are hidden.
Contact freshness evidence tier: Dated contact freshness evidence. Contact freshness evidence combines 3 dated contact records, email timestamps, and 3 official-domain dated email records.
3 dated records 0 within 90 days 0.0% fresh rate 0 within 12 months Latest Sep 2021
Dated email metadata: Dated contact records include 3 email records.
Dated official-domain contact metadata: 3 dated official-domain email records; 0 fall within 12 months of the Jun 2026 source update.
Visible people
4
With contact data
3
Email coverage
3
75.0% of visible profiles
Phone coverage
1
25.0% of visible profiles
Company support channels
Email and phone
Company record includes support email and phone contact channels.
Support channel evidence tier: Dual-channel support evidence. Support evidence combines email and phone channels from the company record; raw contact values are hidden.
Company email sample
Limited company email sample
AeroLeads source data includes 3 email records across 1 domain; raw addresses are hidden. 3 match teampt.com.
Source email evidence tier: Corroborated source email evidence. Source email evidence combines 3 unique source email records, 1 domain, 3 matching teampt.com, and 100.0% official-domain rate.

Email domain intelligence

5 of 11 visible email signals match teampt.com.

Mixed-domain coverage: Visible email signals include official-domain and non-official domains.
Email identity evidence tier: Corroborated email identity evidence. Email identity evidence combines 11 visible email signals, 5 matching teampt.com, 4 people with official-domain email, 45.5% official-domain match, 4 other-domain signals, and 2 personal-domain signals.
45.5% domain match 4 people with official-domain email 6 non-official email signals

Department contact samples

Broad department contact spread: Visible contact samples appear across 2 of 2 mapped departments.
Department contactability evidence tier: High-confidence department contactability evidence. Department contactability evidence combines 4 visible contact samples, 2 of 2 mapped departments, 4 email signals, 1 phone signal, and 3 official-domain email signals; raw contacts are hidden.
Contactability heatmap
Email and phone department contact map
Department samples show 4 email signals and 1 phone signal across 2 contactable departments.
General Email
Email3
Phone0
Executive Email + phone
Email1
Phone1
Official-domain department coverage
Full official-domain department coverage
2 of 2 mapped departments include visible company-domain email signals.
Department Contacts Email Official email Phone
General 3 3 2 0
Executive 1 1 1 1
Top email pattern: flast at 60.0% of matched patterns.
Format example: [first_initial][last]@teampt.com
Strong pattern: One email pattern leads, with secondary variants present.
Email pattern evidence tier: Corroborated email pattern evidence. Email pattern evidence combines 2 matched patterns, 60.0% top-pattern share, format example for teampt.com, and secondary pattern variants.
flast 60.0%
firstlast 40.0%

Explore related pages

Team Physical Therapy Inc email format Team Physical Therapy Inc management graph and contactability signals

Related company intelligence:

3 of 4 visible Team Physical Therapy Inc profiles include email or phone signals. Review people graph
The strongest Team Physical Therapy Inc email pattern signal is [first_initial][last] , representing 60.0% of matched email-pattern evidence in the AeroLeads company graph.
Other observed email-pattern signals for Team Physical Therapy Inc are [first][last] .
In total, AeroLeads has detected 2 aggregate email-pattern signals for Team Physical Therapy Inc. View the detailed email format page .

Team Physical Therapy Inc Email Pattern Intelligence Snapshot

These aggregate patterns support the company intelligence page. The dedicated email-format workflow lives on Team Physical Therapy Inc email format .

Observed pattern
Example pattern
[first_initial][last]
[first_initial][last]@teampt.com
60%
[first][last]
[first][last]@teampt.com
40%

Team Physical Therapy Inc Questions

Team Physical Therapy Inc people graph sample