U.S. Properties Group, Inc.

U.S. Properties Group, Inc. Intelligence, Employees & Workforce Signals

People graph depth
4 signals
Moderate profile graph across 2 mapped departments.
Account research
6 steps
Account research checklist combines person-level contact coverage, ICP fit, technology workforce evidence, related-company graph, domain trust, and people graph depth; raw contact values are hidden.
Technology talent
1
Technology-oriented role signals in the workforce graph.
Domain trust
Corroborated domain alignment
Domain evidence combines website domain, social profile, company email sample, and support email alignment; raw email addresses are hidden.
Evidence quality 100/100 Priority intelligence record

AeroLeads company intelligence

U.S. Properties Group, Inc. workforce intelligence signals

Evidence from AeroLeads company records, matched professional profiles, and related company graph.

High confidence
Intelligence completeness
Strong intelligence record
7 of 11 major intelligence groups are available for this company.
Largest mapped team
IT
1 profile signals in IT.
Departments mapped
2
Workforce composition from AeroLeads profile data.
Profile graph
Moderate profile graph
4 mapped workforce signals against a 17 employee size estimate.
Top seniority band
Individual contributor
3 of 5 classified profile signals.
Technology talent
1
Technology roles and departments found in workforce signals.
Top email pattern
flast
100.0% of matched email patterns.

Profile graph researchability

Visible people graph includes 5 visible people: 5 named, 5 titled, 3 located, and 0 contactable.

Multi-signal profile graph
Profile coverage evidence tier: Moderate profile coverage evidence. Profile coverage evidence combines 4 mapped workforce signals, 17 employee size estimate, and 23.5% profile graph coverage.
Multi-signal profile graph evidence: Researchability is based on 5 visible people with 3 populated evidence dimensions: named, titled, and located signals.
People
5
Named
5
Titled
5
Located
3
Contactable
0

Data methodology

AeroLeads renders only source-backed fields for this company page.

5 source groups
Company record Matched profile graph Email-pattern aggregate Related company graph Company signal fields
Blank source fields are omitted
Related companies are ordered deterministically
Structured data uses aggregate counts only

Intelligence completeness

7 of 11 major intelligence groups are available for this company.

7 / 11 groups
Strong intelligence record 63.6%
Workforce composition Contactability Email intelligence Decision makers Technology talent Domain confidence Market and peer context

Evidence quality

This page clears the 60+ AeroLeads company-intelligence evidence threshold.

100 / 100
Priority intelligence record Threshold 60+
Workforce composition Department seniority map Decision-maker coverage Technology talent Email pattern intelligence Peer graph strength
Workforce graph
14 signals
Workforce composition, Department seniority map, Profile graph researchability
Decision-maker intelligence
4 signals
Decision-maker coverage, Leadership signals, Department leadership coverage
Technology intelligence
1 signal
Technology talent
Contactability
7 signals
Email pattern intelligence, Support email, Support phone
Market and peer context
13 signals
Peer graph strength, Peer position benchmark, Market focus signals
Company momentum
5 signals
Company signal breadth, Company momentum score, Company ownership signal
Source trust
9 signals
Domain confidence, Multi-source domain alignment, Intelligence completeness
47 additional source-backed evidence signals are counted in this page quality score.

Prospecting readiness

U.S. Properties Group, Inc. shows research-first prospecting fit based on decision-maker coverage, technology workforce evidence, people graph depth, and peer context.

35 / 100
Research-first prospecting fit Corroborated prospecting evidence

Prospecting evidence combines decision-maker coverage, technology workforce evidence, people graph depth, and peer context; raw contact values are hidden.

ICP fit
Research ICP fit

ICP fit combines company size, market specificity, technology path, people graph depth, and domain trust; raw contact values are hidden.

58 / 100
Company size
17 employees
Employee estimate is in a common outbound prospecting range.
Market specificity
Focused market profile
6 market classification signals across categories, specialties, and related peer industries.
Technology path
Mapped technology evidence
1 matched technology role signal found in the workforce graph.
People graph depth
Moderate profile graph
4 mapped workforce signals against a 17 employee size estimate.
Domain trust
Corroborated domain alignment
Domain evidence combines website domain, social profile, company email sample, and support email alignment; raw email addresses are hidden.
Account research checklist
Multi-step account research checklist

Account research checklist combines person-level contact coverage, ICP fit, technology workforce evidence, related-company graph, domain trust, and people graph depth; raw contact values are hidden.

6 steps
Confirm contact coverage
Mapped contact-channel evidence
Visible profile or company source data includes email and phone channels.
Validate ICP fit
Research ICP fit
ICP fit combines company size, market specificity, technology path, people graph depth, and domain trust; raw contact values are hidden.
Review technology path
Mapped technology evidence
1 matched technology role signal found in the workforce graph.
Compare related peers
Limited peer comparison
Compares this company with related-company evidence across employee scale and peer graph evidence.
Check domain trust
Corroborated domain alignment
Domain evidence combines website domain, social profile, company email sample, and support email alignment; raw email addresses are hidden.
Review people graph depth
Moderate profile graph
4 mapped workforce signals against a 17 employee size estimate.
Decision-maker coverage
No visible decision-maker contact coverage
Mapped decision-maker signals do not include visible contact data.
Technology contact path
Mapped technology evidence
1 matched technology role signal found in the workforce graph.
People graph depth
Moderate profile graph
4 mapped workforce signals against a 17 employee size estimate.
Peer context
Multi-signal peer benchmark evidence
Peer benchmark combines 1 related company with peer graph strength, size benchmark, and size position. Underlying peer graph includes 4 evidence types: industry context, employee benchmarks, website records, social profiles.
Person-level contact coverage missing: No visible people on this page include email or phone contact evidence.

Domain trust signals

Domain confidence for uspginc.com is based on website domain, social profile, company email sample, and support email alignment.

55 / 100
Corroborated domain alignment Corroborated domain evidence

Domain evidence combines website domain, social profile, company email sample, and support email alignment; raw email addresses are hidden.

Website domain
uspginc.com
The official website domain is available from the company source record.
Social profile
LinkedIn organization page
A LinkedIn organization page is present for this company record.
Company email sample
11 official-domain source email records
Company-level email source records include official-domain coverage; raw addresses are hidden.
Support email alignment
Official-domain support email
The support email channel aligns with the official company domain; raw addresses are hidden.

AeroLeads coverage snapshot

Profile sample
3
Visible people attached to this company page.
Profile graph depth
Moderate profile graph
4 mapped workforce signals against a 17 employee size estimate.
Contact channel mix
Multi-channel contact coverage
Visible profile or company source data includes email and phone channels.
Contact evidence confidence
Mapped contact-channel evidence
Visible profile or company source data includes email and phone channels.
Company support channels
Email and phone
Company record includes support email and phone contact channels.
Department coverage
2
Departments represented in AeroLeads workforce signals.
Department concentration
Department-concentrated workforce
Most mapped workforce signals are in General.
Leadership signals
2
Department lead or leadership signals in the org data.
Department leader sample
Limited department leader sample
AeroLeads source data includes 1 leadership signal across 1 department; rows show titles and contact-channel presence only.
Department leadership coverage
Focused department leadership coverage
Leadership signals appear in 1 of 2 mapped departments.
Leadership density
50
Percent of mapped department signals that are leadership signals.
Department seniority map
Two-department seniority map
Visible department samples map 3 seniority-classified profiles across 2 departments and 2 seniority bands.
Technology talent
1
Visible profiles matching technology role patterns.
Technology evidence confidence
Mapped technology evidence
1 matched technology role signal found in the workforce graph.
Technology department signals
1
Mapped department profile signals in technology-oriented teams.
Email-pattern variants
1
Distinct matched business email patterns.
Domain confidence
Corroborated domain alignment
Domain confidence for uspginc.com is based on website domain, social profile, company email sample, and support email alignment.
Contact data safety
Corroborated privacy-safe contact intelligence
AeroLeads exposes contact counts, channel mix, freshness, and domain-alignment evidence while hiding raw email addresses and masking phone numbers in public output.
Company signal breadth
Multi-signal company record
Company-level signals include social audience, company maturity, ownership, and funding.
Company momentum score
Limited company momentum score
Momentum score blends historical funding signal and peer position from AeroLeads company and profile evidence.
Company ownership signal
Private company record
Company source record includes source type Privately Held.
Audience density
Low audience density
66 followers against 17 employee estimate, about 3.90 followers per estimated employee.
Funding recency
Historical funding signal
Last funding round is 281 months before the Jun 2026 source update.
Specialty signals
4
Specialty tags in the company record.
Market specificity
Focused market profile
6 market classification signals across categories, specialties, and related peer industries.
Peer industry clusters
1
Industries represented by related company records.
Related companies
1
Company graph links available for comparison.
Industry benchmark
Evidence-backed industry benchmark
Industry benchmark uses 1 related company, 1 same-industry peer, 3 benchmark dimensions, and 4 peer evidence types from the AeroLeads related-company graph.
Peer benchmark confidence
Multi-signal peer benchmark evidence
Peer benchmark combines 1 related company with peer graph strength, size benchmark, and size position. Underlying peer graph includes 4 evidence types: industry context, employee benchmarks, website records, social profiles.
Peer position benchmark
Employee-scale peer position benchmark
Peer-position benchmark shows employee scale above 100% of 1 comparable related peer.
Peer comparison matrix
Limited peer comparison
Compares this company with related-company evidence across employee scale and peer graph evidence.
Workforce locations
3
Locations represented in visible profile signals.
Workforce distribution
Multi-location workforce
Visible profile location signals span 3 locations, led by Norwich, Connecticut, United States.
Workforce location footprint
Multi-city workforce footprint
Visible profile locations span 3 cities across 1 country, led by Norwich.
Workforce distribution model
Multi-hub workforce model
Visible profile locations form multiple hubs across 3 locations, led by Norwich, Connecticut, United States at 33%.
Workforce geography evidence confidence
Multi-location workforce geography evidence
Workforce geography spans 3 locations across 3 visible profile signals.
Workforce seniority tiers
2
Seniority bands derived from visible profile titles and levels.
Seniority evidence confidence
Multi-tier seniority evidence
Seniority graph spans 5 classified profile signals across 2 tiers. Contributor-heavy visible sample.
Classified seniority profiles
5
Visible profiles with usable seniority signals.
Management-to-IC proxy
Contributor-heavy visible sample
2 managerial seniority signals and 3 contributor signals appear in the visible seniority-classified sample.
Role title diversity
Diverse role title sample
5 distinct role titles across 5 visible titled profiles.
Visible role titles
5
Distinct role titles found in visible profile signals.
Decision-maker signals
2
Visible profiles matching seniority or leadership title patterns.
Decision-maker reachability
No visible decision-maker contact coverage
Mapped decision-maker signals do not include visible contact data.
Prospecting fit
Research-first prospecting fit
U.S. Properties Group, Inc. shows research-first prospecting fit based on decision-maker coverage, technology workforce evidence, people graph depth, and peer context.
ICP fit
Research ICP fit
U.S. Properties Group, Inc. matches the research ICP fit band for common outbound filters based on company size, market specificity, technology path, people graph depth, and domain trust.
Account research checklist
Multi-step account research checklist
Account research checklist combines person-level contact coverage, ICP fit, technology workforce evidence, related-company graph, domain trust, and people graph depth; raw contact values are hidden.
Intelligence signal groups
19
AeroLeads signal groups available for this company.

Market focus signals

Primary industry
Real Estate
Market specificity
Focused market profile
6 market classification signals across categories, specialties, and related peer industries.
Market evidence tier
High-confidence market evidence
Market evidence combines 6 classification signals from categories, specialties, related peer industries, and description keywords. 6 description-backed keyword signals are included.
Industry benchmark
Evidence-backed industry benchmark
Industry benchmark uses 1 related company, 1 same-industry peer, 3 benchmark dimensions, and 4 peer evidence types from the AeroLeads related-company graph.
Top peer industry
Real Estate
100% of 1 related peer industry signal.
Peer benchmark evidence
Multi-signal peer benchmark evidence
Peer benchmark combines 1 related company with peer graph strength, size benchmark, and size position. Underlying peer graph includes 4 evidence types: industry context, employee benchmarks, website records, social profiles.
Size position
Larger than most related peers
1 of 1 related employee-estimated peer is lower.
Peer graph strength
Evidence-rich peer graph
Related peer graph has industry context, employee benchmarks, website records, and social profiles across 1 related company.
Benchmark dimensions: peer graph strength, size benchmark, and size position.
Categories
Real Estate
Specialties
Real Estate Development Acquisitions / Dispositions Construction / Property Management Retail Leasing / Redevelopment
Product-market keyword evidence
Description-backed market keywords
Keyword evidence comes from 3 source field groups: Category, Specialty, Description.
Product-market keyword evidence tier: High-confidence product-market keyword evidence. Product-market keyword evidence combines 11 unique market keywords, 3 source field groups, and 6 description-backed keywords (1 category, 4 specialty, and 6 description).
Real Estate · Category Real Estate Development · Specialty Acquisitions / Dispositions · Specialty Construction / Property Management · Specialty Retail Leasing / Redevelopment · Specialty was founded · Description create value · Description shopping center assets · Description innovative application · Description acquisition development renovation · Description southeast united states · Description
Related peer industries
Peer-industry evidence tier: Limited peer-industry evidence. Peer-industry evidence combines 1 related company, 1 peer-industry cluster, and top peer industry Real Estate at 100.0%.
Real Estate 1 peer
100.0% of related peer industries

Company signals

Company signal breadth
Multi-signal company record
Company-level signals include social audience, company maturity, ownership, and funding.
Multi-signal company record evidence: Company record evidence combines 4 source-backed company signal types: social audience, company maturity, ownership, and funding.
Social audience
66
Followers in the company source record.
Social audience evidence tier: Limited social-audience evidence. Social audience evidence uses 66 followers from source field social_followers.
Audience density
Low audience density
66 followers against 17 employee estimate, about 3.90 followers per estimated employee.
Audience-density evidence tier: Limited audience-density evidence. Audience-density evidence combines 66 social followers, 17 employee estimate, and 3.90 followers per estimated employee.
Company maturity
Mature company record
Company source record includes founding year 2000, about 26 years before 2026.
Company maturity evidence tier: Long-running maturity evidence. Maturity evidence combines founding year 2000, 26 years of company history, and source field founded.
Company ownership
Private company record
Company source record includes source type Privately Held.
Company ownership evidence tier: Structured ownership evidence. Ownership evidence combines source type Privately Held from structured company source fields.
Funding
Series unknown
Feb 1, 2003 · 1 total rounds
Funding evidence tier: High-confidence funding evidence. Funding evidence combines round type Series unknown, last round date Feb 1, 2003, 1 total round, and historical funding signal from structured company source fields.
Historical funding signal: Last funding round is 281 months before the Jun 2026 source update.

Workforce composition

Department concentration
Department-concentrated workforce
Most mapped workforce signals are in General. 75.0% of mapped department signals are in the largest department.
Department concentration evidence tier: Concentrated department evidence. Department concentration evidence combines 2 mapped departments, top department General, and 75.0% top-department share.
Department leadership coverage
Focused department leadership coverage
Leadership signals appear in 1 of 2 mapped departments. Leadership signals represent 50.0% of mapped department signals.
Department leadership evidence tier: Limited department leadership evidence. Department leadership evidence combines 2 leadership signals, 1 of 2 mapped departments, and 50.0% leadership density.
Department seniority map
Two-department seniority map
Visible department samples map 3 seniority-classified profiles across 2 departments and 2 seniority bands.
Department seniority evidence tier: Corroborated department seniority evidence. Department seniority evidence combines 3 seniority-classified profiles, 2 departments, 2 seniority bands, and top cell General + Manager with 1 profile.
General 2 profiles
Manager: 1 Individual contributor: 1
IT 1 profile
Individual contributor: 1
2 leadership signals
Department leader sample
Limited department leader sample
0 contactable

AeroLeads source data includes 1 leadership signal across 1 department; rows show titles and contact-channel presence only.

Department leader evidence tier: Limited department leader evidence. Department leader evidence combines 1 leadership signal and 1 department; raw contacts are hidden.
Leader Department Seniority Channel
Jay Messi
Property Manager at U.s. Properties Group, Inc.
General Manager No visible contact channel
General 3 signals
75.0% of mapped department signals, 2 leadership signals
IT 1 signals
25.0% of mapped department signals

Technology talent signals

1 matched technology role signals.

Technology evidence tier
Mapped technology evidence
1 matched technology role signal found in the workforce graph.
1 IT department signals
Data / AI 1 profile
100.0% of matched technology role signals
Matched role examples
Versatile Cre Finance, Accounting, and Data Professional 1

Workforce seniority mix

Aggregated from 5 classified profile signals.

Largest seniority band
Individual contributor
3 of 5 classified profile signals.
Multi-tier seniority evidence: Seniority graph spans 5 classified profile signals across 2 tiers. Contributor-heavy visible sample.
Management-to-IC proxy
Contributor-heavy visible sample
40.0%
managerial seniority signals
60.0%
contributor seniority signals
2 managerial seniority signals and 3 contributor signals appear in the visible seniority-classified sample.
Management-shape evidence tier: Contributor-heavy management-shape evidence. Management-shape evidence combines 5 seniority-classified signals, 2 managerial signals, 40.0% managerial share, and 3 contributor signals.
Individual contributor 3 profiles
60.0% of classified seniority signals
Manager 2 profiles
40.0% of classified seniority signals

Workforce geography

Aggregated from 3 visible profile location signals.

Workforce geography evidence
Multi-location workforce geography evidence
Workforce geography spans 3 locations across 3 visible profile signals.
Distribution signal
Multi-location workforce
Visible profile location signals span 3 locations, led by Norwich, Connecticut, United States.
Workforce distribution model
Multi-hub workforce model
Visible profile locations form multiple hubs across 3 locations, led by Norwich, Connecticut, United States at 33%.
Corroborated workforce model evidence: Workforce model evidence combines 3 located profile signals, 3 workforce locations, 3 cities, 1 country, and top hub Norwich, Connecticut, United States at 33%.
Locations
3
Countries
1
Top hub share
33%
Workforce location footprint
Multi-city workforce footprint
Visible profile locations span 3 cities across 1 country, led by Norwich.
Cities
3
Countries
1
Norwich, Connecticut, United States 1 profile
33.3% of visible location signals
West Haven, Connecticut, United States 1 profile
33.3% of visible location signals
Columbus, Ohio Metropolitan Area, United States 1 profile
33.3% of visible location signals

Decision-maker coverage

2 seniority signals.

Decision-maker evidence tier
Mapped decision-maker evidence
Decision-maker evidence covers 2 seniority signals.
No visible decision-maker contact coverage
Mapped decision-maker signals do not include visible contact data.
Manager 2 profiles
100.0% of mapped seniority signals

Role and function mix

5 visible titled profiles across 5 distinct role titles.

Title mix
Diverse role title sample
5 distinct role titles across 5 visible titled profiles.
Role-title evidence tier: Diverse role-title evidence. Role-title diversity evidence combines 5 visible titled profiles, 5 distinct role titles, and top title Corporate Controller at U.s. Properties Group, Inc. at 20.0%.
Corporate Controller at U.s. Properties Group, Inc. 1 profile
20.0% of visible titled profiles
Head Custodian 1 profile
20.0% of visible titled profiles
Property Manager at U.s. Properties Group, Inc. 1 profile
20.0% of visible titled profiles
Senior Regional Manager – Commercial Property & Retail Construction - U.s. Properties 1 profile
20.0% of visible titled profiles
Versatile Cre Finance, Accounting, and Data Professional 1 profile
20.0% of visible titled profiles

Contactability signals

Contact channel mix
Multi-channel contact coverage
Visible profile or company source data includes email and phone channels.
Contact evidence tier
Mapped contact-channel evidence
Visible profile or company source data includes email and phone channels.
Contact data safety
Corroborated privacy-safe contact intelligence
AeroLeads exposes contact counts, channel mix, freshness, and domain-alignment evidence while hiding raw email addresses and masking phone numbers in public output.
Aggregate signals
13
Channel coverage
Email and phone aggregate coverage
Evidence groups
3
Corroborated contact-safety evidence: Contact-safety evidence combines company email sample, support channels, and official-domain email evidence; public schema uses aggregate variables only.
Aggregate-only contact schema: Dataset variables use counts, rates, channel labels, freshness bands, and domain-alignment metrics instead of raw contact values.
Visible people
3
Company support channels
Email and phone
Company record includes support email and phone contact channels.
Support channel evidence tier: Dual-channel support evidence. Support evidence combines email and phone channels from the company record; raw contact values are hidden.
Company email sample
Company email sample
AeroLeads source data includes 11 email records across 1 domain; raw addresses are hidden. 11 match uspginc.com.
Source email evidence tier: High-confidence source email evidence. Source email evidence combines 11 unique source email records, 1 domain, 11 matching uspginc.com, and 100.0% official-domain rate.
Top email pattern: flast at 100.0% of matched patterns.
Format example: [first_initial][last]@uspginc.com
Dominant pattern: One email pattern accounts for most matched examples.
Email pattern evidence tier: High-confidence email pattern evidence. Email pattern evidence combines 1 matched pattern, 100.0% top-pattern share, and format example for uspginc.com.
flast 100.0%
U.S. Properties Group, Inc. source record includes a 17 employee estimate. Review people graph
The strongest U.S. Properties Group, Inc. email pattern signal is [first_initial][last] , representing 100.0% of matched email-pattern evidence in the AeroLeads company graph.
In total, AeroLeads has detected 1 aggregate email-pattern signals for U.S. Properties Group, Inc.. View the detailed email format page .

U.S. Properties Group, Inc. Email Pattern Intelligence Snapshot

These aggregate patterns support the company intelligence page. The dedicated email-format workflow lives on U.S. Properties Group, Inc. email format .

Observed pattern
Example pattern
[first_initial][last]
[first_initial][last]@uspginc.com
100%

U.S. Properties Group, Inc. Questions