Assad Rajani Email & Phone Number

California, United States

Palo Alto, Ca

IP LitigationRepresenting Heraeus in a trade secret misappropriation investigation before the US International Trade Commission against Zimmer Biomet related to Heraeus’ bone cements. In the Matter of Certain Bone Cements, Components Thereof & Products Containing the Same, No. 337-TA-1153 (USITC). Representing Heraeus in a trade secret misappropriation, false advertising, and tortious interference investigation before the US International Trade Commission brought by Zimmer… Show more IP LitigationRepresenting Heraeus in a trade secret misappropriation investigation before the US International Trade Commission against Zimmer Biomet related to Heraeus’ bone cements. In the Matter of Certain Bone Cements, Components Thereof & Products Containing the Same, No. 337-TA-1153 (USITC). Representing Heraeus in a trade secret misappropriation, false advertising, and tortious interference investigation before the US International Trade Commission brought by Zimmer Biomet related to the sale of Heraeus’ bone cements. In the Matter of Certain Bone Cements and Bone Cement Accessories, No. 337-TA-1175 (USITC). Representing Boston Scientific Corporation in enforcing its patents relating to endoscopic clipping against a direct competitor. Boston Scientific v. Cook Group Inc. (D. Delaware, S.D. Indiana, PTAB).Representing Hologic, Inc. in enforcing its patents relating to endometrial ablation against a direct competitor. Hologic obtained summary judgment of infringement, assignor estoppel, and no invalidity and a jury award of approximately US$5 million in damages. Hologic, Inc. v. Minerva Surgical, Inc. (D. Delaware, PTAB).Representing Google and Motorola in a patent infringement suit involving computerized handling of contact information. Arendi S.A.R.L. v. Google Inc., (D. Delaware, PTAB, Fed. Cir.).Representing a global biopharmaceutical company in JAMS arbitration regarding a royalty dispute. Obtained complete victory following 3-day hearing.Representing Time Warner in a patent infringement suit involving video-on-demand content. Prevailed on summary judgment of invalidity. Broadband iTV, Inc. v. TWC, Inc. (D. Hawaii, Fed. Cir.).Representing Cephalon in an ANDA litigation and IPR involving formulations of bendamustine hydrochloride. Cephalon Inc. v. Fresenius Kabi USA, LLC (D. Delaware, PTAB).Representing AAT Bioquest in enforcing its patents relating to a calcium ion indicator. AAT Bioquest v. TEFLabs Inc. (N.D. California). Show less

San Francisco Bay Area

Palo Alto, California

Representing SSL in a patent infringement suit involving end-to-end encryption technology. A jury trial ended with a US$10 million damages award and a US$5 million enhancement for willful infringement in SSL’s favor, which was affirmed on appeal. SSL v. Citrix. (E.D. Texas, Fed. Cir.).Representing Elan Pharmaceuticals in a patent infringement suit involving Alzheimer’s disease assays and transgenic mice. Elan obtained an early dismissal with prejudice. Elan Pharmaceuticals v. Alzheimer’s… Show more Representing SSL in a patent infringement suit involving end-to-end encryption technology. A jury trial ended with a US$10 million damages award and a US$5 million enhancement for willful infringement in SSL’s favor, which was affirmed on appeal. SSL v. Citrix. (E.D. Texas, Fed. Cir.).Representing Elan Pharmaceuticals in a patent infringement suit involving Alzheimer’s disease assays and transgenic mice. Elan obtained an early dismissal with prejudice. Elan Pharmaceuticals v. Alzheimer’s Institute of America (N.D. California).Representing Callidus in a patent infringement suit involving enterprise incentive compensation software and cross asserting Callidus’ patents. Successfully instituted CBM Review challenging the validity of all of Versata’s asserted business method patents and reversed the district court’s denial of a stay pending CBM Review. Callidus Software Inc. v. Versata (D. Delaware, Fed. Cir.).Representing Amgen in a enforcing its patents related to granulocyte colony stimulating factor. The case settled on terms favorable to Amgen. Amgen Inc. v. Teva Pharmaceuticals Ltd. (E.D. Pennsylvania).Representing Callidus in enforcing its patents and asserting business tort and breach of contract claims. The case settled in mediation on terms favorable to Callidus. Callidus Software v. Xactly Corp. (C.D. California). Show less

Cupertino And East Palo Alto, California

Representing Amgen in enforcing its U.S. erythropoietin patents against Roche. The jury rendered a verdict in Amgen’s favor on both infringement and validity for each of the asserted patents-in-suit and the Court entered final judgment and a permanent injunction in Amgen’s favor. Amgen Inc. v. F. Hoffman La-Roche Ltd. (D. Massachusetts, Fed. Cir.).Representing Symantec in a trade secret misappropriation and breach of contract suit involving storage management software. Symantec v… Show more Representing Amgen in enforcing its U.S. erythropoietin patents against Roche. The jury rendered a verdict in Amgen’s favor on both infringement and validity for each of the asserted patents-in-suit and the Court entered final judgment and a permanent injunction in Amgen’s favor. Amgen Inc. v. F. Hoffman La-Roche Ltd. (D. Massachusetts, Fed. Cir.).Representing Symantec in a trade secret misappropriation and breach of contract suit involving storage management software. Symantec v. StorageCraft. (D. Utah). Show less

Palo Alto, California

J.D., Intellectual Property Law

22 Berkeley Tech. L. J. 1 (2007) 21 Berkeley Tech. L. J. 365 (2006)

B.A., English & Textual Studies, History, Religion, Poli-Sci