James (Jamie) Troup Email & Phone Number

Washington D.C. Metro Area

• Mr. Troup regularly litigates cases on a broad range of matters, including allegations of breach of contract, antitrust, business torts, billing disputes, government audits and investigations, constitutional.
• Secured dismissal of a multimillion dollar nationwide class action and established important precedent holding that a telecommunications carrier is not liable for violations by its customers of the Telephone Consumer.

Washington D.C. Metro Area

Prosecuted litigation resulting in the favorable settlement of several billing disputes. See e.g., AT&T v. Reasnor Telephone Co., Case No. 4:07-cv-00117-JEG-RAW (S.D. Iowa 2007); McClure Telephone Co. v. AT&T Communications of Ohio, Inc. and Sprint Communications Co., Case No. 3:08-cv-2800 (N.D. Ohio 2010); Readlyn Telephone Co. v. AT&T Corp., Case No..

Washington D.C. Metro Area

• Obtained for the defendant, the dismissal of a collection action in California federal district court, and following that dismissal, also successfully dismissed the identical complaint that was filed with the FCC. This.
• Procured a jury verdict eliminating all refund claims. Northwest Iowa Telephone Co. v. Qwest, Case No. 04-cv-4053-DEO (N.D. Iowa 2006).
• Obtained favorable settlement of billing disputes. See e.g., RCC Holdings, Inc. v. Rural Telephone Service Co., Case No. 04-2311-KHV-DJW (D. Kan. 2004.

Washington D.C. Metro Area

• Obtained dismissal of all claims that the defendant had violated the state and federal antitrust laws by obtaining an exemption for the defendant under the Parker Doctrine. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. Iowa.
• Successfully defended a telecommunications carrier during a federal government investigation and on-site audit. The defendant was found innocent and no refunds of any amounts were required. In re Sealed Case, No..
• Represented a telecommunications carrier In a suit against the U.S. Government, and successfully obtained a stay of the FCC’s $10 billion auction of personal communications service (“PCS”) spectrum licenses from the.
• Challenged a zoning decision under the federal civil rights laws that had prevented the plaintiff from constructing a tower to provide wireless telecommunications services. A settlement was reached permitting the.
• Successfully prosecuted a lawsuit for non-payment for services rendered that established important precedent regarding application of the Communications Act’s statute of limitations and issue preclusion. Central Scott.
• Successfully litigated a complaint requiring defendant to meet point bill other carriers rather than charge the plaintiff. Elkhart Telephone Co. v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co., 11 FCC Rcd. 1051 (1995).

Washington D.C. Metro Area

Washington D.C. Metro Area

Washington D.C. Metro Area

Juris Doctor (J.D.), Law

Bachelor Of Science In Foreign Service, International Economics