Kelly Hardy Email and Phone Number

Roles and Responsibilities include: • Conduct the AI SIT Readiness Review• Oversee overall coordination of AI event• Develop and execute the master test schedules• Maintain overall cognizance of the schedule and resolve scheduling issues• Develop and submit test plans for leadership review and approval• Develop and submit test artifacts to support obtaining event IATT• Coordinate with CANES, application provider test directors/representatives, and test engineers• Ensure availability of proper resources, i.e., staffing, test environment, test tools. • Ensure all test resources have been identified and properly scheduled• Ensure proper monitoring techniques are utilized• Report defects/troubleshooting• Assess test suspension/initiation • Assess compliance with entry/exit criteria, i.e. review test documentation provided by application providers• Collect test documentation related to the TRR (e.g., test plan, objectives, procedures)• Conduct test completion reviews • Provide daily status reports to AI leadership and other management/oversight teams• Provide consolidated weekly status report as required

• Support PMW 160 as Application Integration (AI) engineer. • Perform requirements analysis and feasibility assessments for multiple C4I systems for integration into both Consolidated Afloat Networks and Enterprise Services (CANES) and Integrated Shipboard Network Systems (ISNS) afloat networks. • Determined the disposition of more than 200 Service Request Forms (SRFs) to date. • Participated in revision of technical assessment survey, incorporating lessons learned from numerous assessments and meetings to more readily gather data required in support of integration into ISNS, and to improve quality and detail of data submitted to AI requirements matrix for routine customer data calls.• Supported customer relationships through active participation in meetings (in person and teleconference), email updates, and frequent phone calls to pass information. Attended information sharing meetings on behalf of customer to support R&D efforts. • Participated in bi-weekly Systems Engineering Integrated Product Team (SE IPT) to brief AI CHENG on updated customer needs during technical integration analysis.

The Computing Infrastructure/Systems Management TDA is technically accountable to the Lead TDA for performance of the systems engineering processes, as follows: • Lead and oversight hardware and system management baseline• Lead and oversight hardware and system management related ECRs and test events.• Assist Lead TDA in planning, scheduling, coordinating test objective reviews, engineering design reviews, test readiness reviews and SIT events.• Lead and coordinate reviews and technical interchange meeting with TPOCs, Product Engineers, and test lab.• Review all hardware and system management related technical documentation and ICRs/ECRs.• Participate in the SE IPT and ISNS technical engineering working group.• Represent ISNS at the CIS Domain WIPT.• Represent ISNS at the Systems Management Domain WIPT.• Report progress at the ISNS Technical Engineering Working Group and SE IPT. • Attended CISCO LIVE 2012

• Network Modeling and Simulation - Data and Packet Analysis automation• Created and analyzed models for various programs• Provided recommendations based on statistical results to funded NAVY Program of Records (POR)• Experience with Wireshark• Attended OPNET 2010 Washington, DC conference

Roles and Responsibilities include: • Provided open-source competitive intelligence to SPAWAR Systems Center- Pacific's leadership• Participated in Strategic and Business Planning to support SPAWAR• Collaborated with other team members on analysis of strategic efforts• Co-author of Naval Engineers Journal abstract: "Human Systems Integration: The Key to Achieving a U.S. Navy of 313 Ships Through Effective Integration of Technology, Personnel, and Training"• Convened multiple meetings with senior Center technical personnel (including several division heads and one department head)• Created concrete objectives for five Tech Board teams• Outlined the goals for Tech Board teams as well as the overall construct of Tech Board withstood by the scrutiny by the Executive Director, the Commanding Officer, and the Center's senior leadership