Michael Navin Email & Phone Number

Detroit, Michigan, United States

• Led an AI implementation forum for court leaders and justice partners - Moderated discussions and facilitated collaboration among stakeholders to assess existing and emerging AI technologies and governance frameworks.
• Directed a court AI project - Oversaw the review of court technologies and AI applications, analyzing both administrative and judicial use cases.
• Spoke on the global stage - Presented on the state of AI in the US Court system at domestic and international conferences.
• Leveraged data analysis for strategic planning - Conducted in-depth analysis of case filing data and generated projections that informed a multi-decade courthouse strategic plan for a large US court.

Detroit, Michigan, United States

• Analyzed caseload trends and recommended resource allocation strategies for improved judicial efficiency.
• Led the Jury Services Department, ensuring effective jury summons issuance, attendance management, and juror compensation.
• Developed court-wide reports to drive continuous monitoring and improvement of case processing timelines.

Detroit, Michigan, United States

• Spearheaded the implementation of an online self-represented litigant form creation program, improving accessibility to court services.
• Contributed to the development of statewide e-filing standards and procedures on a State committee.
• Drafted the Court's Emergency Plan, ensuring preparedness for unforeseen circumstances.

Detroit, Michigan, United States

• Led teams in the seamless implementation of the Court's Civil E-Filing system and a new Family- Domestic Case Management System, enhancing efficiency and user experience.
• Analyzed current business processes, identified gaps, and implemented solutions for improved functionality.

Detroit, Michigan, United States

• Led the implementation of a new Juvenile Docket System, ensuring Delinquent and Neglect cases met critical time standards.
• Analyzed Jury Selection processes and recommended changes, resulting in a reduction in daily juror pool size.
• Identified significant cost-saving opportunities through a comprehensive analysis of consolidating court divisions into a single building.

Lansing, Michigan, United States

• Boosted Court application conversion success rate to 99% through the creation of robust tracking mechanisms.
• Led a team of 30 site support representatives in providing statewide support for the MiCSES application within Family Divisions of Prosecuting Attorney offices.
• Empowered caseworkers by developing comprehensive training materials for data cleanup, conversion, and utilizing the full potential of the new application.

Lansing, Michigan, United States

• Collaborated on defining business requirements and designing functionalities for new MiCSES application releases through JAD sessions. This ensured the application met the needs of stakeholders.
• Developed user guides for Counties, facilitating a smooth transition to the new MiCSES application.
• Optimized Prosecuting Attorney workflows for the MiCSES application by streamlining processes through gap analysis.