Life is a continuous process that is subject to a variety of changes - both expected and unexpected.As for human learning, individual experience paves the road (via our neural pathways) for repetitive behavior.Even more, the ability to assess whether an outcome was at an optimal state is often left to chance guessing - rather than an empirically-based log to track results. - For this reason, my driving passion in life is to bring awareness to utilizing the internal and external processes that a human body presently exhibits (e.g., through analyzing a current state), in order to optimize the likelihood of attaining the specific, goal-driven outcome (e.g., establishing improvement conditions that contribute to continuous improvement, reliably with validity).Collectively, I studied Psychology, together with Statistics and Sociology, for the purpose of exploring human interactions at both the individual and group level. Empirically, I enjoy examining how perceptions of time, money, and resources influence human behavior (overt measures) and cognition (covert measures) on the process of task completion. Current data of human behavior and cognition involving time (e.g., past, present, and future), money (e.g., lost, saved, and earned), and resources (e.g., people, places, and things) illustrates an array of complex interactions; however, these interactions have the potential to either positively or negatively influence a process. Is it perspective that influences process and does it consequently influence outcome? To delve into this question, I would like to study and compare individual and group perceptions longitudinally (e.g., objectively - how time, money, and resources are allocated vs. subjectively - how they are perceived to be allocated by individuals/groups) with reference to process/outcome objectives.