Stanley Young Email & Phone Number

Stanley Young uses his strong advocacy and advising skills to help his clients achieve the best results in intellectual property and other high stakes disputes. He is a Senior Counsel in Covington’s Silicon Valley office, of which he was Managing Partner from 2008 to 2014.His cases have included:In the Matter of Certain Pouch-Type Battery Cells, Battery Modules, and Battery Packs, and Products Containing the Same, ITC Investigation 337-TA-1179. Represented SK Innovation in a patent infringement case against electric vehicle battery products of LG Chem.Motorola v. Lemko, et al. (N.D. Ill.). Represented a global technology company in trade secret lawsuits against Motorola Solutions involving wireless base station technology; obtained a preliminary injunction preventing the transfer of confidential information in the context of a corporate acquisition. Safeclick LLC v. Visa International Service Association and Visa U.S.A., Inc. (N.D. Cal.). Represented defendants in a lawsuit over a patent alleged to cover the Verified by Visa service for authenticating the identity of a payment cardholder in an on-line transaction. Defendants won summary judgment of non-infringement. Obtained affirmance on appeal. Case No. 06-1182 (Fed. Cir. 2006). O2 Micro v. Beyond Innovation (BiTEK), 521 F.3d 1351 (Fed. Cir. 2008). Represented appellant in overturning on appeal a verdict of infringement of three patents asserted against inverter controllers used in the backlighting of LCD screens. Atmel Corporation v. Silicon Storage Technology (N.D. Cal.). Represented plaintiff in patent infringement case involving semiconductor technology. Jury trial resulted in judgment of more than $36 million in client's favor, which was affirmed on appeal. In re Certain Light-Emitting Diodes, ITC Investigation 337-TA-785. Defended Samsung Electronics in International Trade Commission litigation over patents on light conversion techniques and LED package structures.Melendres v. Arpaio. Represented class of Latinos in Maricopa County, Arizona in racial profiling civil rights case. Obtained injunctive relief, including appointment of a federal monitor to oversee reform, and obtained affirmance on appeal. 989 F.Supp.2d 822 (D. Ariz. 2013) and 784 F.3d 1254 (9th Cir. 2015).

Listed skills include Intellectual Property, Trade Secrets, Patent Litigation, Patents, and 11 others.