Research & Evaluation of theoretical model FEM formulations used for SaturnV and ARES I-X Launch Vehicles, began after Vector Calc Ord DiffEqn DC/Hyd/Rigid/Flex/Magnetic/ElectMag Dynamics w/ Bondgraphs (Bondgraphs "can be be modeled in 3D to Visualize "DC torque Rods" and/or Gryroscopic ACS/Attitude Control System Momemntum change for attitude changes/manuevers or control of Despun or Spun sections of stabuilzed orbit Orientation WRT any Vector - Quick Study of Bong Wie Space Vehic Dyna and Ctrll began my Curriculum Dev quest & CritPath health, Thrust (Bondgraphs simplify modeling Graphic Flowchart of of Control Moment GyroscopesLinear Algebra (Strang)Matrix and Vector AnalysisAdv Linear Control (Ogata) covered a approximately 42 hours of post grauate course work in Aerospace and Mechanical MS PhD curriculums, utilized broad public access available to Top-Tier Research and Education Universities and Colleges, mitigated my UG voids related to interests, and built toward NASA exploration Vehicle Structural Dynamics, Controls State Space ElectroMechanical, Robotics, Orbital Mechanics, Theoretical Mechanics, and identified a Plan for 4 year Degree Univ, Pilot Honors program using 3-Text 2 year UG 12 hour option for ME;s that covers Everything NASA needs in an Aerospace Analyst except AeroDrag, ie ME's or Darksiders we wereonce called.I will likely pick thesis to go into SBIR deliverable if I must win SBIR to publish work NASA Dynamics/SILFT work MS Dissertation, plan curriculum and PT retirement Teaching area kids - 20 years from now - 40 hrs/60 hrs done - NASA has CFD folfs? right, I am a Computational Solid/Continuum Mechanics Dynamics and FEM with pencil GEEK, I drink my fluids Hot and Cold, its ok.Seriously I have some Propulsion skills.Primarily, I KNOW 6 DOF, Rigid or Flex, large small - I own EOMsSame for Satellite control using Robot Arm, ACS control device, thrust time/vectorsCMG array full Control w one nozzle, 1 pencil ez

Developed CAD workarounds that solved Pro/E model from RHINO, Plasma Surface. I worked through dozens of of Stellarator Surface Geometry workarounds that allowed our TEAM, to design a Fusion Energy Experimental Reactor interactively with the Plasma FUSION Physicists. Two devices were Engineered past known issues - shown to be designs with solutions for ElectroMagnetic Confinement, Structural and Thermasl cycles were long enough to get useful data. One was to be operated at ORNL, and had a very low cost due to a less agressivce requirements - that followed from fractional funding. Non the less. work done to show feasible Physics for Preliminary Engineering proof of concept, for ORNL's design - led to development of BASIC code programs that mitigated much of the iterative design costs of complex shapes fittted with sheet metal heat sinks, curvedslitted double bent angles - look like bronzed sheetmetal jointfittings from any B727. If we get a power producung model,, maybe it should be Westwind, Pemco or AP mechanics, from a the 1990's working from machined dies for every part - there simply aren't any two places any one small piece could have been used twice - if it we get Fusion - it will not matter the tooling costs. Cancellation of both projects was decided upon to allow the ITER TEAM ti fill its ranks, with funds tranfered.

Shared knowledge experience as well as recruited young engineers, subject matter experts, the Section is changing due UAH's recent Faculty/Chair, and several Officers vigilance. I will be back to share new Mechanics work, and lobby for Continuum Mechanics be satuisfied with element models - by better element shape functions, and the resultant improvement in FEM results - I have seen the the difference in 1993 I was taught 10% error was OK, now MIT syllabus requires zero for Graduate Projects. \I can do better than I did in 2006, or 2009. 1992 theory was not finished.No longer OK for oversized is OK, not cool anymore to waste IRON, or test to find NASA solution is inadequate, or beyond margin limits.

System Design, Layout, Configuration of closed Neutron Beam Guides in order to channel Neutrons Scattering from the Target (usually Mercury) to form an approximately Collimated Rectangular Beam with a Slight taper along both Spans - Vessel to Shutter/Insert Shutter/Insert to (test) InstrumentThe Accelerator streams a Proton Beam that Spalls a Neutron half-disk Radiantly Expanding that become in turn - a Distribution slightly greater than 180-90 deg - at the Target Vessel which connects to all Eighteen Beam Lines. around the Target aka Target Station, each Guide Taper Rqmts imposed the range of Shutter Positions Possible, which are slightly staggered - with a uniform angular spacing, increasing radially from the 1st to the 2nd, and the Second to the Third, providing space Shuttle Systems Design without a decrease in Instrument/Beams or useable neutrons. for Geometry of three Shutter-Insert Designs vs. : [ (1) (2) (3) (4) ](1) Shutter Guide System Feasibility - 6 copies of each of 3 sizes needed total; one of each per group of three = 18x 50 ton (about 50)Shutters are valves, each is a Shut-Off valve upstream of an Instrument, during testing the shutter was to be lifted to aligned with Neutron Detector Neutron beams and Guides required to Form Rigid SleevesConceptual Design Configuration Insert/Guide/Shutter/(2) Layout of Beam Lines (2) Designport-in-Shutter-Ports Positions layout feasibilty conflict resolution determination , reiterative conflicts with and6x Repeating Rotary Pattern of Groups of 3 different Beam Guides Standard 3x Pattern of Neutron 3x "Spiraling/Radial+OffsetsOffset of Layout Negotiation and Re-Negotion

Initial intro to 3D workstation class CAD SW, w/ fully capable model tree type structure ie NOT a static lump with each step boolean RESULT. Began with 2-D 727 Seat track and Seat layout, moved to 3-D in less than 1 week due need and limited options they had. Very similar to current pro/e Applicon's Bravo Solids/Sheetmetal had sheetmetal tool unseen since