Asteor Software

Asteor Software Company Intelligence, Employees & Contact Signals

Contact coverage
Email-led
Visible profile or company source data includes email and phone channels. 2 visible profiles include direct contact evidence.
People graph depth
113 signals
Deep profile graph across 2 mapped departments.
Account research
6 steps
Account research checklist combines best covered outreach path, buying-committee coverage, ICP fit, technology workforce evidence, related-company graph, and domain trust; raw contact values are hidden.
Technology talent
11
Technology-oriented role signals in the workforce graph.
Evidence quality 100/100 Priority intelligence record

AeroLeads company intelligence

Asteor Software workforce and contactability signals

Evidence from AeroLeads company records, matched professional profiles, and related company graph.

High confidence
Intelligence completeness
Strong intelligence record
8 of 11 major intelligence groups are available for this company.
Largest mapped team
IT
112 profile signals in IT.
Departments mapped
2
Workforce composition from AeroLeads profile data.
Profile graph
Deep profile graph
113 mapped workforce signals against a 91 employee size estimate.
Top reachable team
IT
2 visible contact signals.
Top seniority band
Individual contributor
7 of 14 classified profile signals.
Visible contact sample
2
Displayed people with email or phone data.

Profile graph researchability

Visible people graph includes 14 visible people: 14 named, 14 titled, 13 located, and 4 contactable.

Multi-signal profile graph
Profile coverage evidence tier: Deep profile coverage evidence. Profile coverage evidence combines 113 mapped workforce signals, 91 employee size estimate, and 100.0% profile graph coverage.
High-confidence profile graph evidence: Researchability is based on 14 visible people with 4 populated evidence dimensions: named, titled, located, and contactable signals.
Profile association confidence: Corroborated profile association. Association confidence combines 14 titled profiles, 2 official-domain email profiles, 2 titled profiles with official-domain email, 2 located profiles with official-domain email, and 4 contactable profiles.
People
14
Named
14
Titled
14
Located
13
Contactable
4

Data methodology

AeroLeads renders only source-backed fields for this company page.

5 source groups
Company record Matched profile graph Email-pattern aggregate Related company graph Company signal fields
Blank source fields are omitted
Related companies are ordered deterministically
Structured data uses aggregate counts only

Intelligence completeness

8 of 11 major intelligence groups are available for this company.

8 / 11 groups
Strong intelligence record 72.7%
Workforce composition Contactability Email intelligence Decision makers Buying committee Technology talent Domain confidence Market and peer context

Evidence quality

This page clears the 60+ AeroLeads company-intelligence evidence threshold.

100 / 100
Priority intelligence record Threshold 60+
Workforce composition Employee email coverage Department contactability Department seniority map Business function mix Functional team estimates
Workforce graph
30 signals
Workforce composition, Department contactability, Department seniority map
Contactability
15 signals
Employee email coverage, Multi-function contactability, Official-domain function contactability
Source trust
14 signals
Functional team estimates, Functional coverage gap, Domain confidence
Decision-maker intelligence
9 signals
Decision-maker coverage, Leadership signals, Department leadership coverage
Technology intelligence
5 signals
Technology talent, Technology leadership depth, Technology reachability
Market and peer context
14 signals
Related company graph, Peer graph strength, Peer position benchmark
Company momentum
3 signals
Company signal breadth, Company momentum score, Company ownership signal
84 additional source-backed evidence signals are counted in this page quality score.

Prospecting readiness

Asteor Software shows strong prospecting fit based on person-level contact coverage, best covered outreach path, decision-maker coverage, and technology workforce evidence.

90 / 100
Strong prospecting fit High-confidence prospecting evidence

Prospecting evidence combines person-level contact coverage, best covered outreach path, decision-maker coverage, technology workforce evidence, and people graph depth; raw contact values are hidden.

ICP fit
Strong ICP fit

ICP fit combines company size, market specificity, contactability, buying committee, and technology path; raw contact values are hidden.

90 / 100
Company size
91 employees
Employee estimate is in a common outbound prospecting range.
Market specificity
Focused market profile
9 market classification signals across categories, specialties, and related peer industries.
Reachability
High-confidence contact evidence
2 current or verified professional email signals, 3 company-domain email signals, and multi-channel contact coverage; raw addresses and numbers are hidden.
Buying committee
Mapped buying committee
Mapped decision-maker signals span 1 business function.
Technology path
Partial technology reachability
Some matched technology role signals include visible contact data.
Account research checklist
Multi-step account research checklist

Account research checklist combines best covered outreach path, buying-committee coverage, ICP fit, technology workforce evidence, related-company graph, and domain trust; raw contact values are hidden.

6 steps
Confirm contact path
IT + Senior / Lead
Outreach path evidence combines 2 visible IT contact signals and 1 contactable Senior / Lead decision-maker signal; raw contacts are hidden.
Map reachable buying committee
Mapped buying committee
Buying-committee evidence combines 1 mapped buying-committee function, 1 contactable function, and Technology / data function coverage.
Validate ICP fit
Strong ICP fit
ICP fit combines company size, market specificity, contactability, buying committee, and technology path; raw contact values are hidden.
Review technology path
Partial technology reachability
Some matched technology role signals include visible contact data.
Compare related peers
Limited peer comparison
Compares this company with related-company evidence across employee scale and peer graph evidence.
Check domain trust
High-confidence domain alignment
Domain evidence combines website domain, social profile, employee email alignment, profile-domain association, and company email sample; raw email addresses are hidden.
Contact coverage
High-confidence contact evidence
2 current or verified professional email signals, 3 company-domain email signals, and multi-channel contact coverage; raw addresses and numbers are hidden.
Best outreach path
IT + Senior / Lead
Coverage combines 2 visible IT contact signals and 1 contactable Senior / Lead decision-maker signal.
Decision-maker coverage
Mapped buying committee
Mapped decision-maker signals span 1 business function.
Technology contact path
Partial technology reachability
Some matched technology role signals include visible contact data.

Domain trust signals

Domain confidence for asteor.com is based on website domain, social profile, employee email alignment, profile-domain association, and company email sample.

90 / 100
High-confidence domain alignment High-confidence domain evidence

Domain evidence combines website domain, social profile, employee email alignment, profile-domain association, and company email sample; raw email addresses are hidden.

Website domain
asteor.com
The official website domain is available from the company source record.
Social profile
LinkedIn organization page
A LinkedIn organization page is present for this company record.
Employee email alignment
2 official-domain email signals
40% of visible employee email signals match asteor.com; raw addresses are hidden.
Profile-domain association
2 people with official-domain email
Matched people include official-domain email evidence; raw addresses are hidden.
Company email sample
3 official-domain source email records
Company-level email source records include official-domain coverage; raw addresses are hidden.

AeroLeads coverage snapshot

Profile sample
3
Visible people attached to this company page.
Profile graph depth
Deep profile graph
113 mapped workforce signals against a 91 employee size estimate.
Contactable sample
2
Visible people with email or phone data.
Contact channel mix
Multi-channel contact coverage
Visible profile or company source data includes email and phone channels.
Contact evidence confidence
High-confidence contact evidence
2 current or verified professional email signals, 3 company-domain email signals, and multi-channel contact coverage; raw addresses and numbers are hidden.
Company support channels
Phone
Company record includes a support phone channel.
Department coverage
2
Departments represented in AeroLeads workforce signals.
Department concentration
Department-concentrated workforce
Most mapped workforce signals are in IT.
Leadership signals
8
Department lead or leadership signals in the org data.
Department leader sample
Department leader sample
AeroLeads source data includes 8 leadership signals across 1 department; rows show titles and contact-channel presence only.
Department leadership coverage
Focused department leadership coverage
Leadership signals appear in 1 of 2 mapped departments.
Leadership density
7.10
Percent of mapped department signals that are leadership signals.
Department contact coverage
1
Departments with visible contact samples.
Department contact spread
Focused department contact spread
Visible contact samples appear in 1 of 2 mapped departments.
Department seniority map
Two-department seniority map
Visible department samples map 11 seniority-classified profiles across 2 departments and 3 seniority bands.
Technology talent
11
Visible profiles matching technology role patterns.
Technology evidence confidence
Reachable technology evidence
2 matched technology role signals include visible contact data.
Technology reachability
Partial technology reachability
Some matched technology role signals include visible contact data.
Technology contactability rate
18.20
Percent of matched technology role signals with visible contact data.
Technology leadership reachability
Partial technology leadership reachability
Some matched technology leadership signals include visible contact data.
Technology department signals
112
Mapped department profile signals in technology-oriented teams.
Email-pattern variants
1
Distinct matched business email patterns.
Official-domain emails
2
Email signals matching asteor.com.
Email domain confidence
Mixed-domain coverage
Visible email signals include official-domain and non-official domains.
Domain confidence
High-confidence domain alignment
Domain confidence for asteor.com is based on website domain, social profile, employee email alignment, profile-domain association, and company email sample.
Email usability mix
Current email coverage sample
AeroLeads source data includes 5 unique visible email signals; 2 are marked current or verified and 2 are professional-type. Raw addresses are hidden.
Contact data safety
Strong privacy-safe contact intelligence
AeroLeads exposes contact counts, channel mix, freshness, and domain-alignment evidence while hiding raw email addresses and masking phone numbers in public output.
Company signal breadth
Multi-signal company record
Company-level signals include social audience, company maturity, and ownership.
Company momentum score
Limited company momentum score
Momentum score blends contactability and peer position from AeroLeads company and profile evidence.
Company ownership signal
Private company record
Company source record includes source type Privately Held.
Audience density
Low audience density
233 followers against 91 employee estimate, about 2.60 followers per estimated employee.
Specialty signals
4
Specialty tags in the company record.
Market specificity
Focused market profile
9 market classification signals across categories, specialties, and related peer industries.
Peer industry clusters
4
Industries represented by related company records.
Related companies
10
Company graph links available for comparison.
Industry benchmark
Evidence-backed industry benchmark
Industry benchmark uses 10 related companies, 3 same-industry peers, 3 benchmark dimensions, and 4 peer evidence types from the AeroLeads related-company graph.
Peer benchmark confidence
Multi-signal peer benchmark evidence
Peer benchmark combines 10 related companies with peer graph strength, size benchmark, and size position. Underlying peer graph includes 4 evidence types: industry context, employee benchmarks, website records, social profiles.
Peer position benchmark
Employee-scale peer position benchmark
Peer-position benchmark shows employee scale above 85.7% of 7 comparable related peers.
Peer comparison matrix
Limited peer comparison
Compares this company with related-company evidence across employee scale and peer graph evidence.
Workforce locations
4
Locations represented in visible profile signals.
Workforce distribution
Concentrated workforce
Most visible profile location signals are in Thanjavur, Tamil Nadu, India.
Workforce location footprint
Multi-city workforce footprint
Visible profile locations span 4 cities across 1 country, led by Thanjavur.
Workforce distribution model
Workforce hub outside company location
The largest visible workforce hub is Thanjavur, Tamil Nadu, India, while the company location is Durham, Nc, United States.
Workforce geography evidence confidence
High-confidence workforce geography evidence
Workforce geography spans 4 locations across 13 visible profile signals, with reachable evidence across 2 locations and company-domain evidence across 2 locations. Top workforce hub differs from company location.
Contactable workforce locations
2
Workforce locations represented by visible contact samples.
Top contactable workforce location
Thanjavur, Tamil Nadu, India
Visible contact samples span 2 workforce locations, led by Thanjavur, Tamil Nadu, India.
Workforce seniority tiers
3
Seniority bands derived from visible profile titles and levels.
Seniority evidence confidence
High-confidence seniority evidence
Seniority graph spans 14 classified profile signals across 3 tiers, with reachable evidence for 4 and company-domain evidence for 2. Contributor-heavy visible sample.
Classified seniority profiles
14
Visible profiles with usable seniority signals.
Official-domain seniority profiles
Multi-profile official-domain seniority evidence
2 seniority-classified profiles across 1 tier include company-domain email signals.
Management-to-IC proxy
Contributor-heavy visible sample
3 managerial seniority signals and 11 contributor signals appear in the visible seniority-classified sample.
Role title diversity
Diverse role title sample
10 distinct role titles across 14 visible titled profiles.
Visible role titles
10
Distinct role titles found in visible profile signals.
Business function mix
Focused business-function workforce sample
AeroLeads maps 12 visible profile signals into 2 business functions; 3 include visible contact data.
Mapped business functions
2
Business functions inferred from visible profile titles and departments.
Functional team estimates
Engineering team estimate
AeroLeads derives 11 visible engineering team profile signals from mapped business-function signals.
Functional coverage gaps
Partial function coverage map
Visible people signals cover 2 of 8 core business functions. Not observed in the visible graph: Sales / revenue, Marketing / growth, Product / design, and People / HR. Treat this as a coverage gap, not confirmed absence.
Contactable role titles
4
Distinct role titles with visible contact samples.
Contactable role coverage
Diverse contactable role coverage
4 reachable role titles across 4 contactable titled profiles.
Decision-maker signals
7
Visible profiles matching seniority or leadership title patterns.
Decision-maker reachability
Partial decision-maker reachability
Some mapped decision-maker signals include visible contact data.
Buying committee evidence confidence
Mapped buying committee
Mapped decision-maker signals span 1 business function.
Buyer persona availability
Single-persona buyer availability
Mapped decision-maker evidence covers Technology buyer; 1 of 1 buyer persona include visible contact data.
Decision-maker contactability rate
14.30
Percent of mapped decision-maker signals with visible contact data.
Best covered outreach path
IT + Senior / Lead
Coverage combines 2 visible IT contact signals and 1 contactable Senior / Lead decision-maker signal.
Prospecting fit
Strong prospecting fit
Asteor Software shows strong prospecting fit based on person-level contact coverage, best covered outreach path, decision-maker coverage, and technology workforce evidence.
ICP fit
Strong ICP fit
Asteor Software matches the strong ICP fit band for common outbound filters based on company size, market specificity, contactability, buying committee, and technology path.
Account research checklist
Multi-step account research checklist
Account research checklist combines best covered outreach path, buying-committee coverage, ICP fit, technology workforce evidence, related-company graph, and domain trust; raw contact values are hidden.
Intelligence signal groups
26
AeroLeads signal groups available for this company.

Market focus signals

Primary industry
Software Development
Market specificity
Focused market profile
9 market classification signals across categories, specialties, and related peer industries.
Market evidence tier
High-confidence market evidence
Market evidence combines 9 classification signals from categories, specialties, related peer industries, and description keywords. 4 description-backed keyword signals are included.
Industry benchmark
Evidence-backed industry benchmark
Industry benchmark uses 10 related companies, 3 same-industry peers, 3 benchmark dimensions, and 4 peer evidence types from the AeroLeads related-company graph.
Top peer industry
IT Services and IT Consulting
50% of 10 related peer industry signals.
Peer benchmark evidence
Multi-signal peer benchmark evidence
Peer benchmark combines 10 related companies with peer graph strength, size benchmark, and size position. Underlying peer graph includes 4 evidence types: industry context, employee benchmarks, website records, social profiles.
Size position
Larger than most related peers
6 of 7 related employee-estimated peers are lower.
Peer graph strength
Benchmark-ready peer graph
Related peer graph has industry context, employee benchmarks, website records, and social profiles across 10 related companies.
Benchmark dimensions: peer graph strength, size benchmark, and size position.
Categories
Software Development
Specialties
Multi tenant application development platform Strategic talent management Performance management Cloud ready
Product-market keyword evidence
Description-backed market keywords
Keyword evidence comes from 3 source field groups: Category, Specialty, Description.
Product-market keyword evidence tier: High-confidence product-market keyword evidence. Product-market keyword evidence combines 9 unique market keywords, 3 source field groups, and 4 description-backed keywords (1 category, 4 specialty, and 4 description).
Software Development · Category Multi tenant application development platform · Specialty Strategic talent management · Specialty Performance management · Specialty Cloud ready · Specialty present two · Description products techcello · Description synergita techcello provides · Description configurable technology · Description
Related peer industries
Peer-industry evidence tier: High-confidence peer-industry evidence. Peer-industry evidence combines 10 related companies, 4 peer-industry clusters, and top peer industry IT Services and IT Consulting at 50.0%.
Functional coverage gaps
Partial function coverage map
Visible people signals cover 2 of 8 core business functions. Not observed in the visible graph: Sales / revenue, Marketing / growth, Product / design, and People / HR. Treat this as a coverage gap, not confirmed absence.
Transparent function coverage evidence: Function coverage evidence combines observed functions Technology / data and Customer / support and 6 unobserved core functions in the visible graph.
IT Services and IT Consulting 5 peers
50.0% of related peer industries
Software Development 3 peers
30.0% of related peer industries
Retail Apparel and Fashion 1 peer
10.0% of related peer industries
Technology, Information and Internet 1 peer
10.0% of related peer industries

Company signals

Company signal breadth
Multi-signal company record
Company-level signals include social audience, company maturity, and ownership.
Corroborated company record evidence: Company record evidence combines 3 source-backed company signal types: social audience, company maturity, and ownership.
Social audience
233
Followers in the company source record.
Social audience evidence tier: Limited social-audience evidence. Social audience evidence uses 233 followers from source field social_followers.
Audience density
Low audience density
233 followers against 91 employee estimate, about 2.60 followers per estimated employee.
Audience-density evidence tier: Limited audience-density evidence. Audience-density evidence combines 233 social followers, 91 employee estimate, and 2.60 followers per estimated employee.
Company maturity
Scaling company history
Company source record includes founding year 2009, about 17 years before 2026.
Company maturity evidence tier: Founding-year maturity evidence. Maturity evidence combines founding year 2009, 17 years of company history, and source field founded.
Company ownership
Private company record
Company source record includes source type Privately Held.
Company ownership evidence tier: Structured ownership evidence. Ownership evidence combines source type Privately Held from structured company source fields.

Workforce composition

Department concentration
Department-concentrated workforce
Most mapped workforce signals are in IT. 99.1% of mapped department signals are in the largest department.
Department concentration evidence tier: Concentrated department evidence. Department concentration evidence combines 2 mapped departments, top department IT, and 99.1% top-department share.
Department leadership coverage
Focused department leadership coverage
Leadership signals appear in 1 of 2 mapped departments. Leadership signals represent 7.1% of mapped department signals.
Department leadership evidence tier: Limited department leadership evidence. Department leadership evidence combines 8 leadership signals, 1 of 2 mapped departments, and 7.1% leadership density.
Department seniority map
Two-department seniority map
Visible department samples map 11 seniority-classified profiles across 2 departments and 3 seniority bands.
Department seniority evidence tier: Corroborated department seniority evidence. Department seniority evidence combines 11 seniority-classified profiles, 2 departments, 3 seniority bands, and top cell IT + Senior / Lead with 4 profiles.
IT 10 profiles
Manager: 3 Senior / Lead: 4 Individual contributor: 3
General 1 profile
Individual contributor: 1
8 leadership signals 1 departments with visible contacts
Department leader sample
Department leader sample
2 contactable

AeroLeads source data includes 8 leadership signals across 1 department; rows show titles and contact-channel presence only.

Department leader evidence tier: Limited department leader evidence. Department leader evidence combines 8 leadership signals, 1 department, and 2 contactable; raw contacts are hidden.
Leader Department Seniority Channel
Hemalatha Mohan
Market Research - Team Lead at Asteor Software
 IT Senior / Lead Email
Kanimozhi Natarajan
Team Leader at Asteor Software
 IT Individual contributor Email
Tom Jerry
Project Manager at Asteor Software
 IT Manager No visible contact channel
emema ram
Project Manager at Asteor Software
 IT Manager No visible contact channel
maadhu mahi
Project Manager at Asteor Software
 IT Manager No visible contact channel
Reka Devendran
Team Lead at Asteor Software Pvt Ltd
 IT Senior / Lead No visible contact channel
IT 112 signals
99.1% of mapped department signals, 8 leadership signals, 2 visible contacts
General 1 signals
0.9% of mapped department signals

Technology talent signals

11 matched technology role signals, 2 with visible contact data.

Technology evidence tier
Reachable technology evidence
2 matched technology role signals include visible contact data.
Partial technology reachability 18.2%
Some matched technology role signals include visible contact data.
Technology reachability evidence tier: Partial technology reachability evidence. Technology reachability evidence combines 2 contactable technology signals, 11 matched technology signals, and 18.2% role contactability.
High technology leadership depth 63.6%
7 of 11 matched technology role signals indicate leadership seniority.
Technology leadership depth evidence tier: High technology leadership depth evidence. Technology leadership depth evidence combines 7 technology leadership signals, 11 matched technology signals, 63.6% leadership depth, and 1 contactable leadership signal.
Technology leadership coverage
Partial technology leadership reachability
1 of 7 matched technology leadership signals include visible contact data. Some matched technology leadership signals include visible contact data.
Technology leadership reachability evidence tier: Partial technology leadership reachability evidence. Technology leadership reachability evidence combines 1 contactable leadership signal, 7 technology leadership signals, and 14.3% leadership contactability.
112 IT department signals
Engineering 11 profiles
100.0% of matched technology role signals
Matched role examples
Market Research - Team Lead at Asteor Software 1
Team Leader at Asteor Software 1
Project Manager at Asteor Software 3
Team Lead at Asteor Software 2

Workforce seniority mix

Aggregated from 14 classified profile signals.

Largest seniority band
Individual contributor
7 of 14 classified profile signals, 3 with visible contact data, 2 official-domain.
Multi-profile official-domain seniority evidence: 2 seniority-classified profiles across 1 tier include company-domain email signals.
High-confidence seniority evidence: Seniority graph spans 14 classified profile signals across 3 tiers, with reachable evidence for 4 and company-domain evidence for 2. Contributor-heavy visible sample.
Management-to-IC proxy
Contributor-heavy visible sample
21.4%
managerial seniority signals
78.6%
contributor seniority signals
3 managerial seniority signals and 11 contributor signals appear in the visible seniority-classified sample.
Management-shape evidence tier: Contributor-heavy management-shape evidence. Management-shape evidence combines 14 seniority-classified signals, 3 managerial signals, 21.4% managerial share, and 11 contributor signals.
Individual contributor 7 profiles
50.0% of classified seniority signals, 3 with visible contact data, 2 official-domain
Senior / Lead 4 profiles
28.6% of classified seniority signals, 1 with visible contact data
Manager 3 profiles
21.4% of classified seniority signals

Workforce geography

Aggregated from 13 visible profile location signals.

Workforce geography evidence
High-confidence workforce geography evidence
Workforce geography spans 4 locations across 13 visible profile signals, with reachable evidence across 2 locations and company-domain evidence across 2 locations. Top workforce hub differs from company location.
Distribution signal
Concentrated workforce
Most visible profile location signals are in Thanjavur, Tamil Nadu, India.
Workforce distribution model
Workforce hub outside company location
The largest visible workforce hub is Thanjavur, Tamil Nadu, India, while the company location is Durham, Nc, United States.
Corroborated workforce model evidence: Workforce model evidence combines 13 located profile signals, 4 workforce locations, 4 cities, 1 country, top hub Thanjavur, Tamil Nadu, India at 76%, company-location alignment, 2 reachable locations, and 2 company-domain locations.
Locations
4
Countries
1
Top hub share
76%
Workforce location footprint
Multi-city workforce footprint
Visible profile locations span 4 cities across 1 country, led by Thanjavur.
Cities
4
Countries
1
Company-location alignment
Top workforce hub differs from company location
The largest visible workforce location is Thanjavur, Tamil Nadu, India, while the company location is Durham, Nc, United States.
Top workforce hub share: 76.9%
Company-location evidence tier: Workforce-location divergence evidence. Company-location alignment evidence combines company location Durham, Nc, United States, top workforce hub Thanjavur, Tamil Nadu, India, 76.9% top workforce hub share, and location difference.
Contactable location spread
Multi-location contact coverage
Visible contact samples span 2 workforce locations, led by Thanjavur, Tamil Nadu, India.
Contactable location evidence tier: High-confidence contactable location evidence. Contactable location evidence combines 4 contactable profile location signals, 2 workforce locations, top contactable hub Thanjavur, Tamil Nadu, India at 75.0%, and company-location alignment.
Contactable workforce hub differs from company location: The largest contactable workforce location is Thanjavur, Tamil Nadu, India, while the company location is Durham, Nc, United States. Top contactable hub share: 75.0%.
Thanjavur, Tamil Nadu, India 3 contacts
75.0% of contactable location signals
Chinthamani Madurai, Tamil Nadu, India 1 contact
25.0% of contactable location signals
Official-domain location spread
Multi-location official-domain workforce
Company-domain email profile locations span 2 workforce locations, led by Thanjavur, Tamil Nadu, India.
2 profiles with asteor.com email evidence include location signals.
Official-domain location evidence tier: Multi-location official-domain evidence. Official-domain location evidence combines 2 official-domain profile location signals, 2 workforce locations, top official-domain hub Thanjavur, Tamil Nadu, India at 50.0%, and company-location alignment.
Official-domain workforce hub differs from company location: The largest company-domain email workforce location is Thanjavur, Tamil Nadu, India, while the company location is Durham, Nc, United States. Top official-domain hub share: 50.0%.
Thanjavur, Tamil Nadu, India 1 profile
50.0% of official-domain location signals
Chinthamani Madurai, Tamil Nadu, India 1 profile
50.0% of official-domain location signals
Thanjavur, Tamil Nadu, India 10 profiles
76.9% of visible location signals
Chinthamani Madurai, Tamil Nadu, India 1 profile
7.7% of visible location signals
Tamil Nadu, India 1 profile
7.7% of visible location signals
Papanasam, Tamil Nadu, India 1 profile
7.7% of visible location signals

Decision-maker coverage

7 seniority signals, 1 with visible contact data.

Decision-maker evidence tier
Mapped decision-maker evidence
Decision-maker evidence covers 7 seniority signals, 1 reachable. Buying committee spans 1 function.
Account planning snapshot
Multi-signal account planning snapshot
Snapshot combines department reachability, decision-maker coverage, and buying-committee function aggregates.
4 account-planning evidence cards available.
Account planning evidence tier: Multi-source account planning evidence. Account planning evidence combines 4 aggregate account-planning cards, best covered outreach path, 1 reachable buying-committee function, Senior / Lead seniority reachability, and IT department contactability; raw contacts are hidden.
Best covered path
IT + Senior / Lead
Coverage combines 2 visible IT contact signals and 1 contactable Senior / Lead decision-maker signal.
Reachable buying committee
1 of 1 functions
Reachable functions include Technology / data.
Most reachable seniority
Senior / Lead
1 of 4 signals in this seniority band include visible contact data.
Top reachable team
IT
2 visible contact signals in this department sample.
Partial decision-maker reachability 14.3%
Some mapped decision-maker signals include visible contact data.
Decision-maker reachability evidence tier: Partial decision-maker reachability evidence. Decision-maker reachability evidence combines 1 contactable decision-maker signal, 7 mapped decision-maker signals, and 14.3% contactability.
Email-led decision-maker coverage: Mapped decision-maker contact data is strongest for email, with 1 email signals.
Buying committee function coverage
Single-function buying-committee coverage
1 of 1 mapped functions include visible decision-maker contact data.
Mapped buying committee: Mapped decision-maker signals span 1 business function.
Buying committee evidence tier: Mapped buying-committee evidence. Buying-committee evidence combines 1 mapped buying-committee function, 1 contactable function, and Technology / data function coverage.
Buyer persona availability: Single-persona buyer availability. Mapped decision-maker evidence covers Technology buyer; 1 of 1 buyer persona include visible contact data. Reachable buyer persona evidence: Buyer persona evidence combines 1 mapped buyer persona, 1 contactable persona, and Technology buyer coverage.
Technology / data: 1 contactable
Most reachable seniority
Senior / Lead
1 of 4 seniority signals include visible contact data.
Seniority reachability evidence tier: Mapped seniority reachability evidence. Seniority reachability evidence combines 1 contactable Senior / Lead signal, 4 Senior / Lead signals, 25.0% tier contactability, and email coverage.
Senior / Lead 4 profiles
57.1% of mapped seniority signals, 1 with visible contact data
Manager 3 profiles
42.9% of mapped seniority signals

Role and function mix

14 visible titled profiles across 10 distinct role titles.

Title mix
Diverse role title sample
10 distinct role titles across 14 visible titled profiles.
Role-title evidence tier: Diverse role-title evidence. Role-title diversity evidence combines 14 visible titled profiles, 10 distinct role titles, and top title Project Manager at Asteor Software at 21.4%.
Business function mix
Focused business-function workforce sample
AeroLeads maps 12 visible profile signals into 2 business functions; 3 include visible contact data.
Business-function evidence tier: Corroborated business-function evidence. Business-function evidence combines 12 mapped function profile signals, 2 business functions, 3 contactable signals, 2 contactable functions, 1 official-domain signal, 1 official-domain function, and top function Technology / data at 91.7%.
Full function contactability map 2 / 2 functions
2 of 2 mapped business functions include visible contact data.
Single-function official-domain coverage 1 / 2 functions
1 of 2 mapped business functions include visible email signals matching asteor.com.
Functional team estimates
Engineering team estimate
AeroLeads derives 11 visible engineering team profile signals from mapped business-function signals.
Mapped functional team evidence: Functional team estimate evidence combines 11 visible engineering team profile signals.
Engineering team estimate 11 profiles
91.7% of mapped function signals, 2 with visible contact data; Technology / data
Technology / data 11 profiles
91.7% of mapped function signals, 2 with visible contact data
Customer / support 1 profile
8.3% of mapped function signals, 1 with visible contact data
Contactable role coverage
Diverse contactable role coverage
4 reachable role titles across 4 contactable titled profiles.
Contactable role evidence tier: Diverse contactable role evidence. Contactable role evidence combines 4 contactable titled profiles, 4 reachable role titles, and top reachable role Market Research - Team Lead at Asteor Software at 25.0%.
Role title reachability
Broad role-title reachability
4 of 10 distinct visible role titles include email or phone signals.
Role-title reachability evidence tier: Corroborated role-title reachability evidence. Role-title reachability evidence combines 10 visible role titles, 4 reachable titles, 40.0% title reachability, and 2 official-domain titles.
Multi-title official-domain reachability 2 / 10 titles
2 of 10 distinct visible role titles include email signals matching asteor.com.
Project Manager at Asteor Software 3 profiles
21.4% of visible titled profiles
Process Executive at Asteor Software 2 profiles
14.3% of visible titled profiles
Team Lead at Asteor Software 2 profiles
14.3% of visible titled profiles
Accounts Executive at Asteor Software 1 profile
7.1% of visible titled profiles
Market Research - Team Lead at Asteor Software 1 profile
7.1% of visible titled profiles
Proccess Executive at Asteor 1 profile
7.1% of visible titled profiles

Contactability signals

Contactability score 66.7%
2 of 3 visible profiles include email or phone signals.
Contact channel mix
Multi-channel contact coverage
Visible profile or company source data includes email and phone channels.
Contact evidence tier
High-confidence contact evidence
2 current or verified professional email signals, 3 company-domain email signals, and multi-channel contact coverage; raw addresses and numbers are hidden.
Contact data safety
Strong privacy-safe contact intelligence
AeroLeads exposes contact counts, channel mix, freshness, and domain-alignment evidence while hiding raw email addresses and masking phone numbers in public output.
Aggregate signals
6
Channel coverage
Email and phone aggregate coverage
Evidence groups
5
High-confidence contact-safety evidence: Contact-safety evidence combines visible profile contact sample, company email sample, support channels, current email metadata, and official-domain email evidence; public schema uses aggregate variables only.
Aggregate-only contact schema: Dataset variables use counts, rates, channel labels, freshness bands, and domain-alignment metrics instead of raw contact values.
Best covered outreach path
IT + Senior / Lead
Coverage combines 2 visible IT contact signals and 1 contactable Senior / Lead decision-maker signal.
Outreach path evidence tier: Corroborated outreach path evidence. Outreach path evidence combines 2 visible IT contact signals and 1 contactable Senior / Lead decision-maker signal; raw contacts are hidden.
Email usability mix
Current email coverage sample
AeroLeads source data includes 5 unique visible email signals; 2 are marked current or verified and 2 are professional-type. Raw addresses are hidden.
Email usability evidence tier: Corroborated email usability evidence. Email usability evidence combines 5 unique email signals, 2 current or verified, 2 professional-type, and 40.0% current signal rate; raw addresses are hidden.
2 current or verified 2 professional-type 40.0% current signal rate
Visible people
3
With contact data
2
Email coverage
2
66.7% of visible profiles
Company support channels
Phone
Company record includes a support phone channel.
Support channel evidence tier: Single-channel support evidence. Support evidence combines phone channel from the company record; raw contact values are hidden.
Company email sample
Limited company email sample
AeroLeads source data includes 3 email records across 1 domain; raw addresses are hidden. 3 match asteor.com.
Source email evidence tier: Corroborated source email evidence. Source email evidence combines 3 unique source email records, 1 domain, 3 matching asteor.com, and 100.0% official-domain rate.

Email domain intelligence

2 of 5 visible email signals match asteor.com.

Mixed-domain coverage: Visible email signals include official-domain and non-official domains.
Email identity evidence tier: Corroborated email identity evidence. Email identity evidence combines 5 visible email signals, 2 matching asteor.com, 2 people with official-domain email, 40.0% official-domain match, and 3 personal-domain signals.
40.0% domain match 2 people with official-domain email 3 non-official email signals

Department contact samples

Focused department contact spread: Visible contact samples appear in 1 of 2 mapped departments.
Department contactability evidence tier: Limited department contactability evidence. Department contactability evidence combines 2 visible contact samples, 1 of 2 mapped departments, and 2 email signals; raw contacts are hidden.
Department Contacts Email Official email Phone
IT 2 2 0 0
Top email pattern: first.last at 100.0% of matched patterns.
Format example: [first].[last]@asteor.com
Dominant pattern: One email pattern accounts for most matched examples.
Email pattern evidence tier: High-confidence email pattern evidence. Email pattern evidence combines 1 matched pattern, 100.0% top-pattern share, and format example for asteor.com.
first.last 100.0%

Explore related pages

Asteor Software email format Asteor Software management graph and contactability signals

Related company intelligence:

2 of 3 visible Asteor Software profiles include email or phone signals. Review people graph
The strongest Asteor Software email pattern signal is [first].[last] , representing 100.0% of matched email-pattern evidence in the AeroLeads company graph.
In total, AeroLeads has detected 1 aggregate email-pattern signals for Asteor Software. View the detailed email format page .

Asteor Software Email Pattern Intelligence Snapshot

These aggregate patterns support the company intelligence page. The dedicated email-format workflow lives on Asteor Software email format .

Observed pattern
Example pattern
[first].[last]
[first].[last]@asteor.com
100%

Asteor Software Questions

Asteor Software people graph sample