C O / O P

C O / O P Company Intelligence, Employees & Contact Signals

Contact coverage
Email-led
Visible profile or company source data is strongest for email outreach. 1 visible profile includes direct contact evidence.
People graph depth
2 signals
Deep profile graph across 2 mapped departments.
Account research
5 steps
Account research checklist combines person-level contact coverage, ICP fit, related-company graph, domain trust, and people graph depth; raw contact values are hidden.
Email domain match
33% match
Official-domain coverage across 1 of 3 visible email signals for weareco-op.com.
Evidence quality 100/100 Priority intelligence record

AeroLeads company intelligence

C O / O P workforce and contactability signals

Evidence from AeroLeads company records, matched professional profiles, and related company graph.

High confidence
Intelligence completeness
Partial intelligence record
5 of 11 major intelligence groups are available for this company.
Largest mapped team
Executive
1 profile signals in Executive.
Departments mapped
2
Workforce composition from AeroLeads profile data.
Profile graph
Deep profile graph
2 mapped workforce signals against a 1 employee size estimate.
Top reachable team
Executive
1 visible contact signal.
Visible contact sample
1
Displayed people with email or phone data.
Top email pattern
first
100.0% of matched email patterns.

Data methodology

AeroLeads renders only source-backed fields for this company page.

5 source groups
Company record Matched profile graph Email-pattern aggregate Related company graph Company signal fields
Blank source fields are omitted
Related companies are ordered deterministically
Structured data uses aggregate counts only

Intelligence completeness

5 of 11 major intelligence groups are available for this company.

5 / 11 groups
Partial intelligence record 45.5%
Workforce composition Contactability Email intelligence Domain confidence Market and peer context

Evidence quality

This page clears the 60+ AeroLeads company-intelligence evidence threshold.

100 / 100
Priority intelligence record Threshold 60+
Workforce composition Employee email coverage Department contactability Official-domain department contactability Department seniority map Official-domain department leaders
Workforce graph
14 signals
Workforce composition, Department contactability, Official-domain department contactability
Contactability
6 signals
Employee email coverage, Email pattern intelligence, Contact channel mix
Market and peer context
14 signals
Related company graph, Peer graph strength, Peer position benchmark
Company momentum
3 signals
Company signal breadth, Company momentum score, Company ownership signal
Source trust
9 signals
Domain confidence, Multi-source domain alignment, Intelligence completeness
Decision-maker intelligence
3 signals
Leadership signals, Department leadership coverage, Account research checklist
43 additional source-backed evidence signals are counted in this page quality score.

Prospecting readiness

C O / O P shows research-first prospecting fit based on person-level contact coverage, people graph depth, and peer context.

35 / 100
Research-first prospecting fit Corroborated prospecting evidence

Prospecting evidence combines person-level contact coverage, people graph depth, and peer context; raw contact values are hidden.

ICP fit
Research ICP fit

ICP fit combines company size, market specificity, contactability, and domain trust; raw contact values are hidden.

53 / 100
Company size
1 employees
Employee estimate is available for ICP filtering.
Market specificity
Peer-informed market profile
1 related peer industry cluster available.
Reachability
Current email evidence
1 current or verified email signal available; raw addresses are hidden.
Domain trust
Corroborated domain alignment
Domain evidence combines website domain, social profile, employee email alignment, and profile-domain association; raw email addresses are hidden.
Account research checklist
Source-backed account research checklist

Account research checklist combines person-level contact coverage, ICP fit, related-company graph, domain trust, and people graph depth; raw contact values are hidden.

5 steps
Confirm contact coverage
Current email evidence
1 current or verified email signal available; raw addresses are hidden.
Validate ICP fit
Research ICP fit
ICP fit combines company size, market specificity, contactability, and domain trust; raw contact values are hidden.
Compare related peers
Limited peer comparison
Compares this company with related-company evidence across employee scale and peer graph evidence.
Check domain trust
Corroborated domain alignment
Domain evidence combines website domain, social profile, employee email alignment, and profile-domain association; raw email addresses are hidden.
Review people graph depth
Deep profile graph
2 mapped workforce signals against a 1 employee size estimate.
Contact coverage
Current email evidence
1 current or verified email signal available; raw addresses are hidden.
People graph depth
Deep profile graph
2 mapped workforce signals against a 1 employee size estimate.
Peer context
Multi-signal peer benchmark evidence
Peer benchmark combines 10 related companies with peer graph strength, size benchmark, and size position. Underlying peer graph includes 4 evidence types: industry context, employee benchmarks, website records, social profiles.
Decision-maker evidence missing: No mapped decision-maker cluster is strong enough to summarize.

Domain trust signals

Domain confidence for weareco-op.com is based on website domain, social profile, employee email alignment, and profile-domain association.

70 / 100
Corroborated domain alignment Corroborated domain evidence

Domain evidence combines website domain, social profile, employee email alignment, and profile-domain association; raw email addresses are hidden.

Website domain
weareco-op.com
The official website domain is available from the company source record.
Social profile
LinkedIn organization page
A LinkedIn organization page is present for this company record.
Employee email alignment
1 official-domain email signals
33% of visible employee email signals match weareco-op.com; raw addresses are hidden.
Profile-domain association
1 people with official-domain email
Matched people include official-domain email evidence; raw addresses are hidden.

AeroLeads coverage snapshot

Profile sample
1
Visible people attached to this company page.
Profile graph depth
Deep profile graph
2 mapped workforce signals against a 1 employee size estimate.
Contactable sample
1
Visible people with email or phone data.
Contact channel mix
Email-led contact coverage
Visible profile or company source data is strongest for email outreach.
Contact evidence confidence
Current email evidence
1 current or verified email signal available; raw addresses are hidden.
Department coverage
2
Departments represented in AeroLeads workforce signals.
Department concentration
Multi-department workforce
Mapped workforce signals span 2 departments, led by Executive.
Leadership signals
1
Department lead or leadership signals in the org data.
Department leader sample
Limited department leader sample
AeroLeads source data includes 1 leadership signal across 1 department; rows show titles and contact-channel presence only.
Official-domain department leaders
Official-domain leader evidence
1 department leader sample across 1 department includes company-domain email signals.
Department leadership coverage
Focused department leadership coverage
Leadership signals appear in 1 of 2 mapped departments.
Leadership density
50
Percent of mapped department signals that are leadership signals.
Department contact coverage
1
Departments with visible contact samples.
Department contact spread
Focused department contact spread
Visible contact samples appear in 1 of 2 mapped departments.
Official-domain department contactability
Single-department official-domain coverage
1 of 2 mapped departments include visible company-domain email signals.
Department seniority map
Two-department seniority map
Visible department samples map 2 seniority-classified profiles across 2 departments and 2 seniority bands.
Email-pattern variants
1
Distinct matched business email patterns.
Official-domain emails
1
Email signals matching weareco-op.com.
Email domain confidence
Mixed-domain coverage
Visible email signals include official-domain and non-official domains.
Domain confidence
Corroborated domain alignment
Domain confidence for weareco-op.com is based on website domain, social profile, employee email alignment, and profile-domain association.
Contact data safety
Limited privacy-safe contact intelligence
AeroLeads exposes contact counts, channel mix, freshness, and domain-alignment evidence while hiding raw email addresses and masking phone numbers in public output.
Company signal breadth
Multi-signal company record
Company-level signals include social audience, company maturity, and ownership.
Company momentum score
Limited company momentum score
Momentum score blends contactability and peer position from AeroLeads company and profile evidence.
Company ownership signal
Company type signal
Company source record includes source type Partnership.
Audience density
Moderate audience density
33 followers against 1 employee estimate, about 33 followers per estimated employee.
Market specificity
Peer-informed market profile
1 related peer industry cluster available.
Peer industry clusters
1
Industries represented by related company records.
Related companies
10
Company graph links available for comparison.
Industry benchmark
Evidence-backed industry benchmark
Industry benchmark uses 10 related companies, 10 same-industry peers, 3 benchmark dimensions, and 4 peer evidence types from the AeroLeads related-company graph.
Peer benchmark confidence
Multi-signal peer benchmark evidence
Peer benchmark combines 10 related companies with peer graph strength, size benchmark, and size position. Underlying peer graph includes 4 evidence types: industry context, employee benchmarks, website records, social profiles.
Peer position benchmark
Employee-scale peer position benchmark
Peer-position benchmark shows employee scale above 0% of 4 comparable related peers.
Peer comparison matrix
Limited peer comparison
Compares this company with related-company evidence across employee scale and peer graph evidence.
Workforce locations
2
Locations represented in visible profile signals.
Workforce distribution
Multi-location workforce
Visible profile location signals span 2 locations, led by Seattle, Washington, United States.
Workforce location footprint
Multi-country workforce footprint
Visible profile locations span 2 cities across 2 countries, led by Seattle.
Workforce geography evidence confidence
Multi-location workforce geography evidence
Workforce geography spans 2 locations across 2 visible profile signals. Top workforce hub shares company country.
Prospecting fit
Research-first prospecting fit
C O / O P shows research-first prospecting fit based on person-level contact coverage, people graph depth, and peer context.
ICP fit
Research ICP fit
C O / O P matches the research ICP fit band for common outbound filters based on company size, market specificity, contactability, and domain trust.
Account research checklist
Source-backed account research checklist
Account research checklist combines person-level contact coverage, ICP fit, related-company graph, domain trust, and people graph depth; raw contact values are hidden.
Intelligence signal groups
13
AeroLeads signal groups available for this company.

Market focus signals

Primary industry
Graphic Design
Market specificity
Peer-informed market profile
1 related peer industry cluster available.
Market evidence tier
Mapped market evidence
Market evidence combines 2 classification signals from categories, related peer industries, and description keywords. 6 description-backed keyword signals are included.
Industry benchmark
Evidence-backed industry benchmark
Industry benchmark uses 10 related companies, 10 same-industry peers, 3 benchmark dimensions, and 4 peer evidence types from the AeroLeads related-company graph.
Top peer industry
Graphic Design
100% of 10 related peer industry signals.
Peer benchmark evidence
Multi-signal peer benchmark evidence
Peer benchmark combines 10 related companies with peer graph strength, size benchmark, and size position. Underlying peer graph includes 4 evidence types: industry context, employee benchmarks, website records, social profiles.
Size position
Near peer median size
1 related employee-estimated peer is higher and 0 are lower.
Peer graph strength
Benchmark-ready peer graph
Related peer graph has industry context, employee benchmarks, website records, and social profiles across 10 related companies.
Benchmark dimensions: peer graph strength, size benchmark, and size position.
Categories
Graphic Design
Product-market keyword evidence
Description-backed market keywords
Keyword evidence comes from 2 source field groups: Category, Description.
Product-market keyword evidence tier: Corroborated product-market keyword evidence. Product-market keyword evidence combines 7 unique market keywords, 2 source field groups, and 6 description-backed keywords (1 category and 6 description).
Graphic Design · Category designers collaborators brand · Description designers who were · Description unique story · Description email signature · Description greater story · Description created something without · Description
Related peer industries
Peer-industry evidence tier: Limited peer-industry evidence. Peer-industry evidence combines 10 related companies, 1 peer-industry cluster, and top peer industry Graphic Design at 100.0%.
Graphic Design 10 peers
100.0% of related peer industries

Company signals

Company signal breadth
Multi-signal company record
Company-level signals include social audience, company maturity, and ownership.
Corroborated company record evidence: Company record evidence combines 3 source-backed company signal types: social audience, company maturity, and ownership.
Social audience
33
Followers in the company source record.
Social audience evidence tier: Limited social-audience evidence. Social audience evidence uses 33 followers from source field social_followers.
Audience density
Moderate audience density
33 followers against 1 employee estimate, about 33 followers per estimated employee.
Audience-density evidence tier: Limited audience-density evidence. Audience-density evidence combines 33 social followers, 1 employee estimate, and 33 followers per estimated employee.
Company maturity
Scaling company history
Company source record includes founding year 2012, about 14 years before 2026.
Company maturity evidence tier: Founding-year maturity evidence. Maturity evidence combines founding year 2012, 14 years of company history, and source field founded.
Company ownership
Company type signal
Company source record includes source type Partnership.
Company ownership evidence tier: Structured ownership evidence. Ownership evidence combines source type Partnership from structured company source fields.

Workforce composition

Department concentration
Multi-department workforce
Mapped workforce signals span 2 departments, led by Executive. 50.0% of mapped department signals are in the largest department.
Department concentration evidence tier: Multi-department concentration evidence. Department concentration evidence combines 2 mapped departments, top department Executive, and 50.0% top-department share.
Department leadership coverage
Focused department leadership coverage
Leadership signals appear in 1 of 2 mapped departments. Leadership signals represent 50.0% of mapped department signals.
Department leadership evidence tier: Limited department leadership evidence. Department leadership evidence combines 1 leadership signal, 1 of 2 mapped departments, and 50.0% leadership density.
Department seniority map
Two-department seniority map
Visible department samples map 2 seniority-classified profiles across 2 departments and 2 seniority bands.
Department seniority evidence tier: Corroborated department seniority evidence. Department seniority evidence combines 2 seniority-classified profiles, 2 departments, 2 seniority bands, and top cell Executive + Director with 1 profile.
Executive 1 profile
Director: 1
General 1 profile
Associate / junior: 1
1 leadership signals 1 departments with visible contacts
Department leader sample
Limited department leader sample
1 contactable 1 official-domain

AeroLeads source data includes 1 leadership signal across 1 department; rows show titles and contact-channel presence only.

Department leader evidence tier: Limited department leader evidence. Department leader evidence combines 1 leadership signal, 1 department, 1 contactable, and 1 official-domain; raw contacts are hidden.

Official-domain leader evidence: 1 department leader sample across 1 department includes company-domain email signals.

Leader Department Seniority Channel
Mary Shadley
Design Director
 Executive Director Email
Executive 1 signals
50.0% of mapped department signals, 1 leadership signals, 1 visible contact
General 1 signals
50.0% of mapped department signals

Workforce geography

Aggregated from 2 visible profile location signals.

Workforce geography evidence
Multi-location workforce geography evidence
Workforce geography spans 2 locations across 2 visible profile signals. Top workforce hub shares company country.
Distribution signal
Multi-location workforce
Visible profile location signals span 2 locations, led by Seattle, Washington, United States.
Workforce location footprint
Multi-country workforce footprint
Visible profile locations span 2 cities across 2 countries, led by Seattle.
Cities
2
Countries
2
Company-location alignment
Top workforce hub shares company country
The largest visible workforce location is Seattle, Washington, United States, in the same country as company location Oakland, Ca, United States.
Top workforce hub share: 50.0%
Company-location evidence tier: Corroborated company-location alignment evidence. Company-location alignment evidence combines company location Oakland, Ca, United States, top workforce hub Seattle, Washington, United States, 50.0% top workforce hub share, and country match.
Seattle, Washington, United States 1 profile
50.0% of visible location signals
Odisha, India 1 profile
50.0% of visible location signals

Contactability signals

Contactability score 100.0%
1 of 1 visible profiles include email or phone signals.
Contact channel mix
Email-led contact coverage
Visible profile or company source data is strongest for email outreach.
Contact evidence tier
Current email evidence
1 current or verified email signal available; raw addresses are hidden.
Contact data safety
Limited privacy-safe contact intelligence
AeroLeads exposes contact counts, channel mix, freshness, and domain-alignment evidence while hiding raw email addresses and masking phone numbers in public output.
Aggregate signals
1
Channel coverage
Email aggregate coverage
Evidence groups
1
Limited contact-safety evidence: Contact-safety evidence combines visible profile contact sample; public schema uses aggregate variables only.
Aggregate-only contact schema: Dataset variables use counts, rates, channel labels, freshness bands, and domain-alignment metrics instead of raw contact values.
Visible people
1
With contact data
1
Email coverage
1
100.0% of visible profiles

Email domain intelligence

1 of 3 visible email signals match weareco-op.com.

Mixed-domain coverage: Visible email signals include official-domain and non-official domains.
Email identity evidence tier: Mixed email identity evidence. Email identity evidence combines 3 visible email signals, 1 matching weareco-op.com, 1 person with official-domain email, 33.3% official-domain match, and 2 personal-domain signals.
33.3% domain match 1 person with official-domain email 2 non-official email signals

Department contact samples

Focused department contact spread: Visible contact samples appear in 1 of 2 mapped departments.
Department contactability evidence tier: Limited department contactability evidence. Department contactability evidence combines 1 visible contact sample, 1 of 2 mapped departments, 1 email signal, and 1 official-domain email signal; raw contacts are hidden.
Official-domain department coverage
Single-department official-domain coverage
1 of 2 mapped departments include visible company-domain email signals.
Department Contacts Email Official email Phone
Executive 1 1 1 0
Top email pattern: first at 100.0% of matched patterns.
Format example: [first]@weareco-op.com
Dominant pattern: One email pattern accounts for most matched examples.
Email pattern evidence tier: High-confidence email pattern evidence. Email pattern evidence combines 1 matched pattern, 100.0% top-pattern share, and format example for weareco-op.com.
first 100.0%

Explore related pages

C O / O P email format C O / O P management graph and contactability signals

Related company intelligence:

1 of 1 visible C O / O P profile include email or phone signals. Review people graph
The strongest C O / O P email pattern signal is [first] , representing 100.0% of matched email-pattern evidence in the AeroLeads company graph.
In total, AeroLeads has detected 1 aggregate email-pattern signals for C O / O P. View the detailed email format page .

C O / O P Email Pattern Intelligence Snapshot

These aggregate patterns support the company intelligence page. The dedicated email-format workflow lives on C O / O P email format .

Observed pattern
Example pattern
[first]
[first]@weareco-op.com
100%

C O / O P Questions

C O / O P people graph sample

  • Mary Shadley

    Mary Shadley
    Seattle, Washington, United States
    3 email signals: 1 email signal on weareco-op.com, 2 non-official email signals