Cotter Schools

Cotter Schools Company Intelligence, Employees & Contact Signals

Contact coverage
Email + phone
Visible profile or company source data includes email and phone channels. 3 visible profiles include direct contact evidence.
People graph depth
41 signals
Deep profile graph across 3 mapped departments.
Account research
6 steps
Account research checklist combines best covered outreach path, buying-committee coverage, ICP fit, technology workforce evidence, related-company graph, and domain trust; raw contact values are hidden.
Technology talent
1
Technology-oriented role signals in the workforce graph.
Evidence quality 100/100 Priority intelligence record

AeroLeads company intelligence

Cotter Schools workforce and contactability signals

Evidence from AeroLeads company records, matched professional profiles, and related company graph.

High confidence
Intelligence completeness
Strong intelligence record
8 of 11 major intelligence groups are available for this company.
Largest mapped team
Executive
5 profile signals in Executive.
Departments mapped
3
Workforce composition from AeroLeads profile data.
Profile graph
Deep profile graph
41 mapped workforce signals against a 80 employee size estimate.
Top reachable team
General
9 visible contact signals.
Top seniority band
Individual contributor
10 of 17 classified profile signals.
Visible contact sample
3
Displayed people with email or phone data.

Profile graph researchability

Visible people graph includes 17 visible people: 17 named, 17 titled, 17 located, and 16 contactable.

Multi-signal profile graph
Profile coverage evidence tier: Deep profile coverage evidence. Profile coverage evidence combines 41 mapped workforce signals, 80 employee size estimate, and 51.2% profile graph coverage.
High-confidence profile graph evidence: Researchability is based on 17 visible people with 4 populated evidence dimensions: named, titled, located, and contactable signals.
Profile association confidence: High-confidence profile association. Association confidence combines 17 titled profiles, 11 official-domain email profiles, 11 titled profiles with official-domain email, 11 located profiles with official-domain email, and 16 contactable profiles.
People
17
Named
17
Titled
17
Located
17
Contactable
16

Data methodology

AeroLeads renders only source-backed fields for this company page.

5 source groups
Company record Matched profile graph Email-pattern aggregate Related company graph Company signal fields
Blank source fields are omitted
Related companies are ordered deterministically
Structured data uses aggregate counts only

Intelligence completeness

8 of 11 major intelligence groups are available for this company.

8 / 11 groups
Strong intelligence record 72.7%
Workforce composition Contactability Email intelligence Decision makers Buying committee Technology talent Domain confidence Market and peer context

Evidence quality

This page clears the 60+ AeroLeads company-intelligence evidence threshold.

100 / 100
Priority intelligence record Threshold 60+
Workforce composition Employee email coverage Employee phone coverage Department contactability Department contactability heatmap Official-domain department contactability
Workforce graph
37 signals
Workforce composition, Department contactability, Department contactability heatmap
Contactability
16 signals
Employee email coverage, Employee phone coverage, Multi-function contactability
Source trust
14 signals
Functional team estimates, Functional coverage gap, Domain confidence
Decision-maker intelligence
13 signals
Decision-maker coverage, Leadership signals, Department leadership coverage
Technology intelligence
4 signals
Technology talent, Technology reachability, Technology leadership
Market and peer context
13 signals
Related company graph, Peer graph strength, Peer position benchmark
Company momentum
3 signals
Company signal breadth, Company momentum score, Company ownership signal
94 additional source-backed evidence signals are counted in this page quality score.

Prospecting readiness

Cotter Schools shows strong prospecting fit based on person-level contact coverage, best covered outreach path, decision-maker coverage, and technology workforce evidence.

90 / 100
Strong prospecting fit High-confidence prospecting evidence

Prospecting evidence combines person-level contact coverage, best covered outreach path, decision-maker coverage, technology workforce evidence, and people graph depth; raw contact values are hidden.

ICP fit
Strong ICP fit

ICP fit combines company size, market specificity, contactability, buying committee, and technology path; raw contact values are hidden.

90 / 100
Company size
80 employees
Employee estimate is in a common outbound prospecting range.
Market specificity
Focused market profile
16 market classification signals across categories, specialties, and related peer industries.
Reachability
High-confidence contact evidence
13 current or verified professional email signals, 1 company-domain email signal, and multi-channel contact coverage; raw addresses and numbers are hidden.
Buying committee
Reachable buying committee
3 of 3 mapped buying-committee functions include visible decision-maker contact data.
Technology path
High technology reachability
Most matched technology role signals include visible contact data.
Account research checklist
Multi-step account research checklist

Account research checklist combines best covered outreach path, buying-committee coverage, ICP fit, technology workforce evidence, related-company graph, and domain trust; raw contact values are hidden.

6 steps
Confirm contact path
General + Director
Outreach path evidence combines 9 visible General contact signals, 4 contactable Director decision-maker signals, and 4 official-domain decision-maker email signals; raw contacts are hidden.
Map reachable buying committee
Reachable buying committee
Buying-committee evidence combines 3 mapped buying-committee functions, 3 contactable functions, 2 official-domain functions on cotterschools.org, and Marketing / growth, Operations, and Product / design function coverage.
Validate ICP fit
Strong ICP fit
ICP fit combines company size, market specificity, contactability, buying committee, and technology path; raw contact values are hidden.
Review technology path
High technology reachability
Most matched technology role signals include visible contact data.
Compare related peers
Limited peer comparison
Compares this company with related-company evidence across employee scale and peer graph evidence.
Check domain trust
High-confidence domain alignment
Domain evidence combines website domain, social profile, employee email alignment, profile-domain association, and company email sample; raw email addresses are hidden.
Contact coverage
High-confidence contact evidence
13 current or verified professional email signals, 1 company-domain email signal, and multi-channel contact coverage; raw addresses and numbers are hidden.
Best outreach path
General + Director
Coverage combines 9 visible General contact signals, 4 contactable Director decision-maker signals, and 4 official-domain decision-maker email signals.
Decision-maker coverage
Reachable buying committee
3 of 3 mapped buying-committee functions include visible decision-maker contact data.
Technology contact path
High technology reachability
Most matched technology role signals include visible contact data.

Domain trust signals

Domain confidence for cotterschools.org is based on website domain, social profile, employee email alignment, profile-domain association, and company email sample.

90 / 100
High-confidence domain alignment High-confidence domain evidence

Domain evidence combines website domain, social profile, employee email alignment, profile-domain association, and company email sample; raw email addresses are hidden.

Website domain
cotterschools.org
The official website domain is available from the company source record.
Social profile
LinkedIn organization page
A LinkedIn organization page is present for this company record.
Employee email alignment
11 official-domain email signals
30% of visible employee email signals match cotterschools.org; raw addresses are hidden.
Profile-domain association
11 people with official-domain email
Matched people include official-domain email evidence; raw addresses are hidden.
Company email sample
1 official-domain source email records
Company-level email source records include official-domain coverage; raw addresses are hidden.

AeroLeads coverage snapshot

Profile sample
4
Visible people attached to this company page.
Profile graph depth
Deep profile graph
41 mapped workforce signals against a 80 employee size estimate.
Contactable sample
3
Visible people with email or phone data.
Contact channel mix
Multi-channel contact coverage
Visible profile or company source data includes email and phone channels.
Contact evidence confidence
High-confidence contact evidence
13 current or verified professional email signals, 1 company-domain email signal, and multi-channel contact coverage; raw addresses and numbers are hidden.
Department coverage
3
Departments represented in AeroLeads workforce signals.
Department concentration
Department-concentrated workforce
Most mapped workforce signals are in General.
Leadership signals
10
Department lead or leadership signals in the org data.
Department leader sample
Department leader sample
AeroLeads source data includes 10 leadership signals across 2 departments; rows show titles and contact-channel presence only.
Official-domain department leaders
Multi-department official-domain leaders
6 department leader samples across 2 departments include company-domain email signals.
Department leadership coverage
Broad department leadership coverage
Leadership signals appear across 2 of 3 mapped departments.
Leadership density
24.40
Percent of mapped department signals that are leadership signals.
Department contact coverage
3
Departments with visible contact samples.
Department contact spread
Broad department contact spread
Visible contact samples appear across 3 of 3 mapped departments.
Department contactability heatmap
Email and phone department contact map
Department samples show 14 email signals and 5 phone signals across 3 contactable departments.
Official-domain department contactability
Multi-department official-domain coverage
2 of 3 mapped departments include visible company-domain email signals.
Department seniority map
Multi-department seniority map
Visible department samples map 15 seniority-classified profiles across 3 departments and 3 seniority bands.
Technology talent
1
Visible profiles matching technology role patterns.
Technology evidence confidence
Reachable technology evidence
1 matched technology role signal include visible contact data.
Technology reachability
High technology reachability
Most matched technology role signals include visible contact data.
Technology contactability rate
100
Percent of matched technology role signals with visible contact data.
Technology leadership reachability
Strong technology leadership reachability
Most matched technology leadership signals include visible contact data.
Technology department signals
1
Mapped department profile signals in technology-oriented teams.
Email-pattern variants
1
Distinct matched business email patterns.
Official-domain emails
11
Email signals matching cotterschools.org.
Email domain confidence
Mixed-domain coverage
Visible email signals include official-domain and non-official domains.
Domain confidence
High-confidence domain alignment
Domain confidence for cotterschools.org is based on website domain, social profile, employee email alignment, profile-domain association, and company email sample.
Email usability mix
Current email coverage sample
AeroLeads source data includes 36 unique visible email signals; 13 are marked current or verified and 24 are professional-type. Raw addresses are hidden.
Contact data safety
Corroborated privacy-safe contact intelligence
AeroLeads exposes contact counts, channel mix, freshness, and domain-alignment evidence while hiding raw email addresses and masking phone numbers in public output.
Company signal breadth
Multi-signal company record
Company-level signals include social audience, company maturity, and ownership.
Company momentum score
Limited company momentum score
Momentum score blends contactability and peer position from AeroLeads company and profile evidence.
Company ownership signal
Company type signal
Company source record includes source type Educational.
Audience density
Low audience density
180 followers against 80 employee estimate, about 2.20 followers per estimated employee.
Specialty signals
10
Specialty tags in the company record.
Market specificity
Focused market profile
16 market classification signals across categories, specialties, and related peer industries.
Peer industry clusters
9
Industries represented by related company records.
Related companies
10
Company graph links available for comparison.
Industry benchmark
Peer-informed industry benchmark
Industry benchmark uses 10 related companies, 3 benchmark dimensions, and 3 peer evidence types from the AeroLeads related-company graph.
Peer benchmark confidence
Multi-signal peer benchmark evidence
Peer benchmark combines 10 related companies with peer graph strength, size benchmark, and size position. Underlying peer graph includes 3 evidence types: employee benchmarks, website records, social profiles.
Peer position benchmark
Employee-scale peer position benchmark
Peer-position benchmark shows employee scale above 60% of 10 comparable related peers.
Peer comparison matrix
Limited peer comparison
Compares this company with related-company evidence across employee scale and peer graph evidence.
Workforce locations
6
Locations represented in visible profile signals.
Workforce distribution
Concentrated workforce
Most visible profile location signals are in Winona, Minnesota, United States.
Workforce location footprint
Multi-city workforce footprint
Visible profile locations span 6 cities across 1 country, led by Winona.
Workforce distribution model
HQ-centered workforce model
The largest visible workforce hub matches the company location and represents 70% of visible location signals.
Workforce geography evidence confidence
High-confidence workforce geography evidence
Workforce geography spans 6 locations across 17 visible profile signals, with reachable evidence across 6 locations and company-domain evidence across 4 locations. Top workforce hub matches company location.
Contactable workforce locations
6
Workforce locations represented by visible contact samples.
Top contactable workforce location
Winona, Minnesota, United States
Visible contact samples span 6 workforce locations, led by Winona, Minnesota, United States.
Workforce seniority tiers
3
Seniority bands derived from visible profile titles and levels.
Seniority evidence confidence
High-confidence seniority evidence
Seniority graph spans 17 classified profile signals across 3 tiers, with reachable evidence for 16 and company-domain evidence for 11. Contributor-heavy visible sample.
Classified seniority profiles
17
Visible profiles with usable seniority signals.
Official-domain seniority profiles
Multi-profile official-domain seniority evidence
11 seniority-classified profiles across 3 tiers include company-domain email signals.
Management-to-IC proxy
Contributor-heavy visible sample
5 managerial seniority signals and 12 contributor signals appear in the visible seniority-classified sample.
Role title diversity
Diverse role title sample
16 distinct role titles across 17 visible titled profiles.
Visible role titles
16
Distinct role titles found in visible profile signals.
Business function mix
Broad business-function workforce sample
AeroLeads maps 4 visible profile signals into 4 business functions; 4 include visible contact data.
Mapped business functions
4
Business functions inferred from visible profile titles and departments.
Functional team estimates
Revenue and engineering team estimates
AeroLeads derives 1 visible revenue team profile signal and 1 visible engineering team profile signal from mapped business-function signals.
Functional coverage gaps
Broad function coverage with visible gaps
Visible people signals cover 4 of 8 core business functions. Not observed in the visible graph: Sales / revenue, People / HR, Finance, and Customer / support. Treat this as a coverage gap, not confirmed absence.
Contactable role titles
15
Distinct role titles with visible contact samples.
Contactable role coverage
Diverse contactable role coverage
15 reachable role titles across 16 contactable titled profiles.
Decision-maker signals
7
Visible profiles matching seniority or leadership title patterns.
Decision-maker reachability
High decision-maker reachability
Most mapped decision-maker signals include visible contact data.
Buying committee evidence confidence
Reachable buying committee
3 of 3 mapped buying-committee functions include visible decision-maker contact data.
Buyer persona availability
Multi-persona buyer availability
Mapped decision-maker evidence covers Marketing buyer, Operations buyer, and Product buyer; 3 of 3 buyer personas include visible contact data.
Decision-maker contactability rate
85.70
Percent of mapped decision-maker signals with visible contact data.
Official-domain decision-maker coverage
Partial official-domain decision-maker coverage
Some contactable decision-maker signals use cotterschools.org email coverage.
Official-domain decision-maker contacts
4
Contactable decision-maker signals with official-domain email coverage.
Best covered outreach path
General + Director
Coverage combines 9 visible General contact signals, 4 contactable Director decision-maker signals, and 4 official-domain decision-maker email signals.
Prospecting fit
Strong prospecting fit
Cotter Schools shows strong prospecting fit based on person-level contact coverage, best covered outreach path, decision-maker coverage, and technology workforce evidence.
ICP fit
Strong ICP fit
Cotter Schools matches the strong ICP fit band for common outbound filters based on company size, market specificity, contactability, buying committee, and technology path.
Account research checklist
Multi-step account research checklist
Account research checklist combines best covered outreach path, buying-committee coverage, ICP fit, technology workforce evidence, related-company graph, and domain trust; raw contact values are hidden.
Intelligence signal groups
25
AeroLeads signal groups available for this company.

Market focus signals

Primary industry
Education
Market specificity
Focused market profile
16 market classification signals across categories, specialties, and related peer industries.
Market evidence tier
High-confidence market evidence
Market evidence combines 16 classification signals from categories, specialties, related peer industries, and description keywords. 5 description-backed keyword signals are included.
Industry benchmark
Peer-informed industry benchmark
Industry benchmark uses 10 related companies, 3 benchmark dimensions, and 3 peer evidence types from the AeroLeads related-company graph.
Top peer industry
Religious Institutions
20% of 10 related peer industry signals.
Peer benchmark evidence
Multi-signal peer benchmark evidence
Peer benchmark combines 10 related companies with peer graph strength, size benchmark, and size position. Underlying peer graph includes 3 evidence types: employee benchmarks, website records, social profiles.
Size position
Near peer median size
4 related employee-estimated peers are higher and 6 are lower.
Peer graph strength
Partial peer evidence graph
Related peer graph has employee benchmarks, website records, and social profiles across 10 related companies.
Benchmark dimensions: peer graph strength, size benchmark, and size position.
Categories
Education
Specialties
Boarding School Private School STEM Arts Academics Athletics Band Marching Band
Product-market keyword evidence
Description-backed market keywords
Keyword evidence comes from 3 source field groups: Category, Specialty, Description.
Product-market keyword evidence tier: High-confidence product-market keyword evidence. Product-market keyword evidence combines 16 unique market keywords, 3 source field groups, and 5 description-backed keywords (1 category, 10 specialty, and 5 description).
Education · Category Boarding School · Specialty Private School · Specialty STEM · Specialty Arts · Specialty Academics · Specialty Athletics · Specialty Band · Specialty Marching Band · Specialty Choir · Specialty Theater · Specialty serve infants · Description
Related peer industries
Peer-industry evidence tier: High-confidence peer-industry evidence. Peer-industry evidence combines 10 related companies, 5 peer-industry clusters, and top peer industry Religious Institutions at 20.0%.
Functional coverage gaps
Broad function coverage with visible gaps
Visible people signals cover 4 of 8 core business functions. Not observed in the visible graph: Sales / revenue, People / HR, Finance, and Customer / support. Treat this as a coverage gap, not confirmed absence.
Transparent function coverage evidence: Function coverage evidence combines observed functions Marketing / growth, Technology / data, Product / design, and Operations and 4 unobserved core functions in the visible graph.
Religious Institutions 2 peers
20.0% of related peer industries
Machinery Manufacturing 1 peer
10.0% of related peer industries
Education Administration Programs 1 peer
10.0% of related peer industries
Food and Beverage Services 1 peer
10.0% of related peer industries
Manufacturing 1 peer
10.0% of related peer industries

Company signals

Company signal breadth
Multi-signal company record
Company-level signals include social audience, company maturity, and ownership.
Corroborated company record evidence: Company record evidence combines 3 source-backed company signal types: social audience, company maturity, and ownership.
Social audience
180
Followers in the company source record.
Social audience evidence tier: Limited social-audience evidence. Social audience evidence uses 180 followers from source field social_followers.
Audience density
Low audience density
180 followers against 80 employee estimate, about 2.20 followers per estimated employee.
Audience-density evidence tier: Limited audience-density evidence. Audience-density evidence combines 180 social followers, 80 employee estimate, and 2.20 followers per estimated employee.
Company maturity
Established company record
Company source record includes founding year 1911, about 115 years before 2026.
Company maturity evidence tier: Long-running maturity evidence. Maturity evidence combines founding year 1911, 115 years of company history, and source field founded.
Company ownership
Company type signal
Company source record includes source type Educational.
Company ownership evidence tier: Structured ownership evidence. Ownership evidence combines source type Educational from structured company source fields.

Workforce composition

Department concentration
Department-concentrated workforce
Most mapped workforce signals are in General. 85.4% of mapped department signals are in the largest department.
Department concentration evidence tier: Concentrated department evidence. Department concentration evidence combines 3 mapped departments, top department General, and 85.4% top-department share.
Department leadership coverage
Broad department leadership coverage
Leadership signals appear across 2 of 3 mapped departments. Leadership signals represent 24.4% of mapped department signals.
Department leadership evidence tier: High-confidence department leadership evidence. Department leadership evidence combines 10 leadership signals, 2 of 3 mapped departments, and 24.4% leadership density.
Department seniority map
Multi-department seniority map
Visible department samples map 15 seniority-classified profiles across 3 departments and 3 seniority bands.
Department seniority evidence tier: High-confidence department seniority evidence. Department seniority evidence combines 15 seniority-classified profiles, 3 departments, 3 seniority bands, and top cell General + Individual contributor with 7 profiles.
General 9 profiles
Senior / Lead: 2 Individual contributor: 7
Executive 5 profiles
Director: 5
IT 1 profile
Individual contributor: 1
10 leadership signals 3 departments with visible contacts
Department leader sample
Department leader sample
9 contactable 6 official-domain

AeroLeads source data includes 10 leadership signals across 2 departments; rows show titles and contact-channel presence only.

Department leader evidence tier: High-confidence department leader evidence. Department leader evidence combines 10 leadership signals, 2 departments, 9 contactable, and 6 official-domain; raw contacts are hidden.

Multi-department official-domain leaders: 6 department leader samples across 2 departments include company-domain email signals.

Leader Department Seniority Channel
Anna Koopman
Director of Operations at Cotter Schools
 Executive Director Email
Jana Korder
Director of Marketing & Communications at Cotter Schools
 Executive Director Email and phone
Jeff Novakoski
Cotter Schools International Enrollment Director
 Executive Director Email and phone
Fallon (Devine) Modjeski
Lead Educare Teacher
 General Senior / Lead Email
Jacque Paulsen
Change Management Specialist
 General Individual contributor Email
Lori Ortega
Student Supervisor, Sports Management, Substitute Teacher
 General Individual contributor Email
General 35 signals
85.4% of mapped department signals, 5 leadership signals, 9 visible contacts
Executive 5 signals
12.2% of mapped department signals, 5 leadership signals, 4 visible contacts
IT 1 signals
2.4% of mapped department signals, 1 visible contact

Technology talent signals

1 matched technology role signals, 1 with visible contact data.

Technology evidence tier
Reachable technology evidence
1 matched technology role signal include visible contact data.
High technology reachability 100.0%
Most matched technology role signals include visible contact data.
Technology reachability evidence tier: High technology reachability evidence. Technology reachability evidence combines 1 contactable technology signal, 1 matched technology signal, and 100.0% role contactability.
Technology leadership coverage
Strong technology leadership reachability
1 of 1 matched technology leadership signals include visible contact data. Most matched technology leadership signals include visible contact data.
Technology leadership reachability evidence tier: Strong technology leadership reachability evidence. Technology leadership reachability evidence combines 1 contactable leadership signal, 1 technology leadership signal, and 100.0% leadership contactability.
1 IT department signals
Product / design 1 profile
100.0% of matched technology role signals
Matched role examples
Theatre Maker - Planning & Communication Consultant - Production Manager - Intimacy 1

Workforce seniority mix

Aggregated from 17 classified profile signals.

Largest seniority band
Individual contributor
10 of 17 classified profile signals, 10 with visible contact data, 7 official-domain.
Multi-profile official-domain seniority evidence: 11 seniority-classified profiles across 3 tiers include company-domain email signals.
High-confidence seniority evidence: Seniority graph spans 17 classified profile signals across 3 tiers, with reachable evidence for 16 and company-domain evidence for 11. Contributor-heavy visible sample.
Management-to-IC proxy
Contributor-heavy visible sample
29.4%
managerial seniority signals
70.6%
contributor seniority signals
5 managerial seniority signals and 12 contributor signals appear in the visible seniority-classified sample.
Management-shape evidence tier: Contributor-heavy management-shape evidence. Management-shape evidence combines 17 seniority-classified signals, 5 managerial signals, 29.4% managerial share, and 12 contributor signals.
Individual contributor 10 profiles
58.8% of classified seniority signals, 10 with visible contact data, 7 official-domain
Director 5 profiles
29.4% of classified seniority signals, 4 with visible contact data, 3 official-domain
Senior / Lead 2 profiles
11.8% of classified seniority signals, 2 with visible contact data, 1 official-domain

Workforce geography

Aggregated from 17 visible profile location signals.

Workforce geography evidence
High-confidence workforce geography evidence
Workforce geography spans 6 locations across 17 visible profile signals, with reachable evidence across 6 locations and company-domain evidence across 4 locations. Top workforce hub matches company location.
Distribution signal
Concentrated workforce
Most visible profile location signals are in Winona, Minnesota, United States.
Workforce distribution model
HQ-centered workforce model
The largest visible workforce hub matches the company location and represents 70% of visible location signals.
Corroborated workforce model evidence: Workforce model evidence combines 17 located profile signals, 6 workforce locations, 6 cities, 1 country, top hub Winona, Minnesota, United States at 70%, company-location alignment, 6 reachable locations, and 4 company-domain locations.
Locations
6
Countries
1
Top hub share
70%
Workforce location footprint
Multi-city workforce footprint
Visible profile locations span 6 cities across 1 country, led by Winona.
Cities
6
Countries
1
Company-location alignment
Top workforce hub matches company location
The largest visible workforce location is Winona, Minnesota, United States, matching the company location Winona, Minnesota, United States.
Top workforce hub share: 70.6%
Company-location evidence tier: High-confidence company-location alignment evidence. Company-location alignment evidence combines company location Winona, Minnesota, United States, top workforce hub Winona, Minnesota, United States, 70.6% top workforce hub share, and locality match.
Contactable location spread
Multi-location contact coverage
Visible contact samples span 6 workforce locations, led by Winona, Minnesota, United States.
Contactable location evidence tier: High-confidence contactable location evidence. Contactable location evidence combines 16 contactable profile location signals, 6 workforce locations, top contactable hub Winona, Minnesota, United States at 68.8%, and company-location alignment.
Contactable workforce hub matches company location: The largest contactable workforce location is Winona, Minnesota, United States, matching the company location Winona, Minnesota, United States. Top contactable hub share: 68.8%.
Winona, Minnesota, United States 11 contacts
68.8% of contactable location signals
La Crosse-onalaska Area, United States 1 contact
6.2% of contactable location signals
Flippin, Arkansas, United States 1 contact
6.2% of contactable location signals
Homer, Minnesota, United States 1 contact
6.2% of contactable location signals
Gassville, Arkansas, United States 1 contact
6.2% of contactable location signals
Official-domain location spread
Multi-location official-domain workforce
Company-domain email profile locations span 4 workforce locations, led by Winona, Minnesota, United States.
11 profiles with cotterschools.org email evidence include location signals.
Official-domain location evidence tier: High-confidence official-domain location evidence. Official-domain location evidence combines 11 official-domain profile location signals, 4 workforce locations, top official-domain hub Winona, Minnesota, United States at 72.7%, and company-location alignment.
Official-domain workforce hub matches company location: The largest company-domain email workforce location is Winona, Minnesota, United States, matching the company location Winona, Minnesota, United States. Top official-domain hub share: 72.7%.
Winona, Minnesota, United States 8 profiles
72.7% of official-domain location signals
Homer, Minnesota, United States 1 profile
9.1% of official-domain location signals
Gassville, Arkansas, United States 1 profile
9.1% of official-domain location signals
Fountain City, Wisconsin, United States 1 profile
9.1% of official-domain location signals
Winona, Minnesota, United States 12 profiles
70.6% of visible location signals
La Crosse-onalaska Area, United States 1 profile
5.9% of visible location signals
Flippin, Arkansas, United States 1 profile
5.9% of visible location signals
Homer, Minnesota, United States 1 profile
5.9% of visible location signals
Gassville, Arkansas, United States 1 profile
5.9% of visible location signals
Fountain City, Wisconsin, United States 1 profile
5.9% of visible location signals

Decision-maker coverage

7 seniority signals, 6 with visible contact data.

Decision-maker evidence tier
Corroborated decision-maker evidence
Decision-maker evidence covers 7 seniority signals, 6 reachable, and 4 company-domain. Buying committee spans 3 functions.
Account planning snapshot
Multi-signal account planning snapshot
Snapshot combines department reachability, decision-maker coverage, and buying-committee function aggregates.
4 account-planning evidence cards available.
Account planning evidence tier: Multi-source account planning evidence. Account planning evidence combines 4 aggregate account-planning cards, best covered outreach path, 3 reachable buying-committee functions, 4 official-domain decision-maker signals, Director seniority reachability, and General department contactability; raw contacts are hidden.
Best covered path
General + Director
Coverage combines 9 visible General contact signals, 4 contactable Director decision-maker signals, and 4 official-domain decision-maker email signals.
Reachable buying committee
3 of 3 functions
Reachable functions include Marketing / growth, Operations, and Product / design.
Most reachable seniority
Director
4 of 5 signals in this seniority band include visible contact data.
Top reachable team
General
9 visible contact signals in this department sample.
High decision-maker reachability 85.7%
Most mapped decision-maker signals include visible contact data.
Decision-maker reachability evidence tier: High decision-maker reachability evidence. Decision-maker reachability evidence combines 6 contactable decision-maker signals, 7 mapped decision-maker signals, 85.7% contactability, 4 official-domain decision-maker signals, and 3 dual-channel signals.
Email and phone decision-maker coverage: Mapped decision-maker signals include 6 email signals, 3 phone signals, and 3 with both channels.
Buying committee function coverage
Broad buying-committee coverage
3 of 3 mapped functions include visible decision-maker contact data.
Multi-function official-domain buying committee: 2 of 3 mapped business functions include decision-maker email coverage on cotterschools.org.
Reachable buying committee: 3 of 3 mapped buying-committee functions include visible decision-maker contact data.
Buying committee evidence tier: Reachable buying-committee evidence. Buying-committee evidence combines 3 mapped buying-committee functions, 3 contactable functions, 2 official-domain functions on cotterschools.org, and Marketing / growth, Operations, and Product / design function coverage.
Buyer persona availability: Multi-persona buyer availability. Mapped decision-maker evidence covers Marketing buyer, Operations buyer, and Product buyer; 3 of 3 buyer personas include visible contact data. High-confidence buyer persona evidence: Buyer persona evidence combines 3 mapped buyer personas, 3 contactable personas, 2 official-domain personas on cotterschools.org, and Marketing buyer, Operations buyer, and Product buyer coverage.
Marketing / growth: 1 contactable Operations: 1 contactable Product / design: 1 contactable
Most reachable seniority
Director
4 of 5 seniority signals include visible contact data.
Seniority reachability evidence tier: Corroborated seniority reachability evidence. Seniority reachability evidence combines 4 contactable Director signals, 5 Director signals, 80.0% tier contactability, 3 official-domain Director signals, and email and phone coverage.
Official-domain decision-maker coverage
Partial official-domain decision-maker coverage
4 contactable decision-maker signals match cotterschools.org. Some contactable decision-maker signals use cotterschools.org email coverage.
Official-domain decision-maker evidence tier: Partial official-domain decision-maker evidence. Official-domain decision-maker evidence combines 4 official-domain decision-maker signals, 6 contactable decision-maker signals, 66.7% official-domain coverage, and cotterschools.org domain match.
Director 5 profiles
71.4% of mapped seniority signals, 4 with visible contact data
Senior / Lead 2 profiles
28.6% of mapped seniority signals, 2 with visible contact data

Role and function mix

17 visible titled profiles across 16 distinct role titles.

Title mix
Diverse role title sample
16 distinct role titles across 17 visible titled profiles.
Role-title evidence tier: Diverse role-title evidence. Role-title diversity evidence combines 17 visible titled profiles, 16 distinct role titles, and top title Change Management Specialist at 11.8%.
Business function mix
Broad business-function workforce sample
AeroLeads maps 4 visible profile signals into 4 business functions; 4 include visible contact data.
Business-function evidence tier: Corroborated business-function evidence. Business-function evidence combines 4 mapped function profile signals, 4 business functions, 4 contactable signals, 4 contactable functions, 2 official-domain signals, 2 official-domain functions, and top function Marketing / growth at 25.0%.
Full function contactability map 4 / 4 functions
4 of 4 mapped business functions include visible contact data.
Multi-function official-domain coverage 2 / 4 functions
2 of 4 mapped business functions include visible email signals matching cotterschools.org.
Functional team estimates
Revenue and engineering team estimates
AeroLeads derives 1 visible revenue team profile signal and 1 visible engineering team profile signal from mapped business-function signals.
Corroborated functional team evidence: Functional team estimate evidence combines 1 visible revenue team profile signal and 1 visible engineering team profile signal.
Revenue team estimate 1 profile
25.0% of mapped function signals, 1 with visible contact data; Marketing / growth
Engineering team estimate 1 profile
25.0% of mapped function signals, 1 with visible contact data; Technology / data
Marketing / growth 1 profile
25.0% of mapped function signals, 1 with visible contact data
Operations 1 profile
25.0% of mapped function signals, 1 with visible contact data
Product / design 1 profile
25.0% of mapped function signals, 1 with visible contact data
Technology / data 1 profile
25.0% of mapped function signals, 1 with visible contact data
Contactable role coverage
Diverse contactable role coverage
15 reachable role titles across 16 contactable titled profiles.
Contactable role evidence tier: Diverse contactable role evidence. Contactable role evidence combines 16 contactable titled profiles, 15 reachable role titles, and top reachable role Change Management Specialist at 12.5%.
Role title reachability
Broad role-title reachability
15 of 16 distinct visible role titles include email or phone signals.
Role-title reachability evidence tier: Corroborated role-title reachability evidence. Role-title reachability evidence combines 16 visible role titles, 15 reachable titles, 93.8% title reachability, and 11 official-domain titles.
Multi-title official-domain reachability 11 / 16 titles
11 of 16 distinct visible role titles include email signals matching cotterschools.org.
Change Management Specialist 2 profiles
11.8% of visible titled profiles
Attended Saint Mary's University of Minnesota 1 profile
5.9% of visible titled profiles
Character.leadership.diversity.community 1 profile
5.9% of visible titled profiles
Cotter Schools International Enrollment Director 1 profile
5.9% of visible titled profiles
Director of Marketing & Communications at Cotter Schools 1 profile
5.9% of visible titled profiles
Director of Mission Integration 1 profile
5.9% of visible titled profiles

Contactability signals

Contactability score 75.0%
3 of 4 visible profiles include email or phone signals.
Contact channel mix
Multi-channel contact coverage
Visible profile or company source data includes email and phone channels.
Contact evidence tier
High-confidence contact evidence
13 current or verified professional email signals, 1 company-domain email signal, and multi-channel contact coverage; raw addresses and numbers are hidden.
Contact data safety
Corroborated privacy-safe contact intelligence
AeroLeads exposes contact counts, channel mix, freshness, and domain-alignment evidence while hiding raw email addresses and masking phone numbers in public output.
Aggregate signals
4
Channel coverage
Email and phone aggregate coverage
Evidence groups
4
Corroborated contact-safety evidence: Contact-safety evidence combines visible profile contact sample, company email sample, current email metadata, and official-domain email evidence; public schema uses aggregate variables only.
Aggregate-only contact schema: Dataset variables use counts, rates, channel labels, freshness bands, and domain-alignment metrics instead of raw contact values.
Best covered outreach path
General + Director
Coverage combines 9 visible General contact signals, 4 contactable Director decision-maker signals, and 4 official-domain decision-maker email signals.
Outreach path evidence tier: High-confidence outreach path evidence. Outreach path evidence combines 9 visible General contact signals, 4 contactable Director decision-maker signals, and 4 official-domain decision-maker email signals; raw contacts are hidden.
Email usability mix
Current email coverage sample
AeroLeads source data includes 36 unique visible email signals; 13 are marked current or verified and 24 are professional-type. Raw addresses are hidden.
Email usability evidence tier: High-confidence email usability evidence. Email usability evidence combines 36 unique email signals, 13 current or verified, 2 verified, 24 professional-type, and 36.1% current signal rate; raw addresses are hidden.
13 current or verified 24 professional-type 36.1% current signal rate
Visible people
4
With contact data
3
Email coverage
3
75.0% of visible profiles
Phone coverage
2
50.0% of visible profiles
Company email sample
Limited company email sample
AeroLeads source data includes 1 email record across 1 domain; raw addresses are hidden. 1 match cotterschools.org.
Source email evidence tier: Limited source email evidence. Source email evidence combines 1 unique source email record, 1 domain, 1 matching cotterschools.org, and 100.0% official-domain rate.

Email domain intelligence

11 of 36 visible email signals match cotterschools.org.

Mixed-domain coverage: Visible email signals include official-domain and non-official domains.
Email identity evidence tier: Corroborated email identity evidence. Email identity evidence combines 36 visible email signals, 11 matching cotterschools.org, 11 people with official-domain email, 30.6% official-domain match, 18 other-domain signals, and 7 personal-domain signals.
30.6% domain match 11 people with official-domain email 25 non-official email signals

Department contact samples

Broad department contact spread: Visible contact samples appear across 3 of 3 mapped departments.
Department contactability evidence tier: High-confidence department contactability evidence. Department contactability evidence combines 14 visible contact samples, 3 of 3 mapped departments, 14 email signals, 5 phone signals, and 9 official-domain email signals; raw contacts are hidden.
Contactability heatmap
Email and phone department contact map
Department samples show 14 email signals and 5 phone signals across 3 contactable departments.
General Email + phone
Email9
Phone3
Executive Email + phone
Email4
Phone2
IT Email
Email1
Phone0
Official-domain department coverage
Multi-department official-domain coverage
2 of 3 mapped departments include visible company-domain email signals.
Department Contacts Email Official email Phone
General 9 9 6 3
Executive 4 4 3 2
IT 1 1 0 0
Top email pattern: flast at 100.0% of matched patterns.
Format example: [first_initial][last]@cotterschools.org
Dominant pattern: One email pattern accounts for most matched examples.
Email pattern evidence tier: High-confidence email pattern evidence. Email pattern evidence combines 1 matched pattern, 100.0% top-pattern share, and format example for cotterschools.org.
flast 100.0%

Explore related pages

Cotter Schools email format Cotter Schools management graph and contactability signals

Related company intelligence:

3 of 4 visible Cotter Schools profiles include email or phone signals. Review people graph
The strongest Cotter Schools email pattern signal is [first_initial][last] , representing 100.0% of matched email-pattern evidence in the AeroLeads company graph.
In total, AeroLeads has detected 1 aggregate email-pattern signals for Cotter Schools. View the detailed email format page .

Cotter Schools Email Pattern Intelligence Snapshot

These aggregate patterns support the company intelligence page. The dedicated email-format workflow lives on Cotter Schools email format .

Observed pattern
Example pattern
[first_initial][last]
[first_initial][last]@cotterschools.org
100%

Cotter Schools Questions

Cotter Schools people graph sample