Dual Immersion Academy

Dual Immersion Academy Company Intelligence, Employees & Contact Signals

Contact coverage
Email + phone
Visible profile or company source data includes email and phone channels. 3 visible profiles include direct contact evidence.
People graph depth
33 signals
Deep profile graph across 3 mapped departments.
Account research
6 steps
Account research checklist combines best covered outreach path, buying-committee coverage, ICP fit, related-company graph, domain trust, and people graph depth; raw contact values are hidden.
Technology talent
1
Technology-oriented role signals in the workforce graph.
Evidence quality 100/100 Priority intelligence record

AeroLeads company intelligence

Dual Immersion Academy workforce and contactability signals

Evidence from AeroLeads company records, matched professional profiles, and related company graph.

High confidence
Intelligence completeness
Strong intelligence record
7 of 11 major intelligence groups are available for this company.
Largest mapped team
Executive
1 profile signals in Executive.
Departments mapped
3
Workforce composition from AeroLeads profile data.
Profile graph
Deep profile graph
33 mapped workforce signals against a 56 employee size estimate.
Top reachable team
General
7 visible contact signals.
Top seniority band
Individual contributor
9 of 14 classified profile signals.
Visible contact sample
3
Displayed people with email or phone data.

Profile graph researchability

Visible people graph includes 14 visible people: 14 named, 14 titled, 13 located, and 11 contactable.

Multi-signal profile graph
Profile coverage evidence tier: Deep profile coverage evidence. Profile coverage evidence combines 33 mapped workforce signals, 56 employee size estimate, and 58.9% profile graph coverage.
High-confidence profile graph evidence: Researchability is based on 14 visible people with 4 populated evidence dimensions: named, titled, located, and contactable signals.
Profile association confidence: High-confidence profile association. Association confidence combines 14 titled profiles, 8 official-domain email profiles, 8 titled profiles with official-domain email, 8 located profiles with official-domain email, and 11 contactable profiles.
People
14
Named
14
Titled
14
Located
13
Contactable
11

Data methodology

AeroLeads renders only source-backed fields for this company page.

5 source groups
Company record Matched profile graph Email-pattern aggregate Related company graph Company signal fields
Blank source fields are omitted
Related companies are ordered deterministically
Structured data uses aggregate counts only

Intelligence completeness

7 of 11 major intelligence groups are available for this company.

7 / 11 groups
Strong intelligence record 63.6%
Workforce composition Contactability Email intelligence Decision makers Buying committee Domain confidence Market and peer context

Evidence quality

This page clears the 60+ AeroLeads company-intelligence evidence threshold.

100 / 100
Priority intelligence record Threshold 60+
Workforce composition Employee email coverage Employee phone coverage Department contactability Department contactability heatmap Official-domain department contactability
Workforce graph
35 signals
Workforce composition, Department contactability, Department contactability heatmap
Contactability
12 signals
Employee email coverage, Employee phone coverage, Email pattern intelligence
Source trust
13 signals
Functional team estimates, Functional coverage gap, Domain confidence
Decision-maker intelligence
12 signals
Decision-maker coverage, Leadership signals, Department leadership coverage
Market and peer context
14 signals
Related company graph, Peer graph strength, Peer position benchmark
Company momentum
5 signals
Company signal breadth, Company momentum score, Company ownership signal
85 additional source-backed evidence signals are counted in this page quality score.

Prospecting readiness

Dual Immersion Academy shows strong prospecting fit based on person-level contact coverage, best covered outreach path, decision-maker coverage, and people graph depth.

75 / 100
Strong prospecting fit High-confidence prospecting evidence

Prospecting evidence combines person-level contact coverage, best covered outreach path, decision-maker coverage, people graph depth, and peer context; raw contact values are hidden.

ICP fit
Strong ICP fit

ICP fit combines company size, market specificity, contactability, buying committee, and domain trust; raw contact values are hidden.

80 / 100
Company size
56 employees
Employee estimate is in a common outbound prospecting range.
Market specificity
Tagged market profile
2 category and specialty signals in the company record.
Reachability
High-confidence contact evidence
15 current or verified professional email signals, and multi-channel contact coverage; raw addresses and numbers are hidden.
Buying committee
Mapped buying committee
Mapped decision-maker signals span 2 business functions.
Domain trust
High-confidence domain alignment
Domain evidence combines website domain, social profile, employee email alignment, profile-domain association, and profile association confidence; raw email addresses are hidden.
Account research checklist
Multi-step account research checklist

Account research checklist combines best covered outreach path, buying-committee coverage, ICP fit, related-company graph, domain trust, and people graph depth; raw contact values are hidden.

6 steps
Confirm contact path
General + Executive
Outreach path evidence combines 7 visible General contact signals, 2 contactable Executive decision-maker signals, and 2 official-domain decision-maker email signals; raw contacts are hidden.
Map reachable buying committee
Mapped buying committee
Buying-committee evidence combines 2 mapped buying-committee functions, 1 contactable function, and Executive / corporate and Technology / data function coverage.
Validate ICP fit
Strong ICP fit
ICP fit combines company size, market specificity, contactability, buying committee, and domain trust; raw contact values are hidden.
Compare related peers
Limited peer comparison
Compares this company with related-company evidence across employee scale and peer graph evidence.
Check domain trust
High-confidence domain alignment
Domain evidence combines website domain, social profile, employee email alignment, profile-domain association, and profile association confidence; raw email addresses are hidden.
Review people graph depth
Deep profile graph
33 mapped workforce signals against a 56 employee size estimate.
Contact coverage
High-confidence contact evidence
15 current or verified professional email signals, and multi-channel contact coverage; raw addresses and numbers are hidden.
Best outreach path
General + Executive
Coverage combines 7 visible General contact signals, 2 contactable Executive decision-maker signals, and 2 official-domain decision-maker email signals.
Decision-maker coverage
Mapped buying committee
Mapped decision-maker signals span 2 business functions.
People graph depth
Deep profile graph
33 mapped workforce signals against a 56 employee size estimate.

Domain trust signals

Domain confidence for diacharter.org is based on website domain, social profile, employee email alignment, profile-domain association, and profile association confidence.

80 / 100
High-confidence domain alignment High-confidence domain evidence

Domain evidence combines website domain, social profile, employee email alignment, profile-domain association, and profile association confidence; raw email addresses are hidden.

Website domain
diacharter.org
The official website domain is available from the company source record.
Social profile
LinkedIn organization page
A LinkedIn organization page is present for this company record.
Employee email alignment
12 official-domain email signals
60% of visible employee email signals match diacharter.org; raw addresses are hidden.
Profile-domain association
8 people with official-domain email
Matched people include official-domain email evidence; raw addresses are hidden.
Profile association confidence
8 titled official-domain profiles
Titled profile samples also include official-domain email evidence.

AeroLeads coverage snapshot

Profile sample
4
Visible people attached to this company page.
Profile graph depth
Deep profile graph
33 mapped workforce signals against a 56 employee size estimate.
Contactable sample
3
Visible people with email or phone data.
Contact channel mix
Multi-channel contact coverage
Visible profile or company source data includes email and phone channels.
Contact evidence confidence
High-confidence contact evidence
15 current or verified professional email signals, and multi-channel contact coverage; raw addresses and numbers are hidden.
Department coverage
3
Departments represented in AeroLeads workforce signals.
Department concentration
Department-concentrated workforce
Most mapped workforce signals are in General.
Leadership signals
4
Department lead or leadership signals in the org data.
Department leader sample
Department leader sample
AeroLeads source data includes 4 leadership signals across 2 departments; rows show titles and contact-channel presence only.
Official-domain department leaders
Multi-department official-domain leaders
3 department leader samples across 2 departments include company-domain email signals.
Department leadership coverage
Broad department leadership coverage
Leadership signals appear across 2 of 3 mapped departments.
Leadership density
12.10
Percent of mapped department signals that are leadership signals.
Department contact coverage
3
Departments with visible contact samples.
Department contact spread
Broad department contact spread
Visible contact samples appear across 3 of 3 mapped departments.
Department contactability heatmap
Email-led department contact map
Department samples show 9 email signals and 0 phone signals across 3 contactable departments.
Official-domain department contactability
Full official-domain department coverage
3 of 3 mapped departments include visible company-domain email signals.
Department seniority map
Multi-department seniority map
Visible department samples map 11 seniority-classified profiles across 3 departments and 4 seniority bands.
Email-pattern variants
2
Distinct matched business email patterns.
Official-domain emails
12
Email signals matching diacharter.org.
Email domain confidence
Mixed-domain coverage
Visible email signals include official-domain and non-official domains.
Domain confidence
High-confidence domain alignment
Domain confidence for diacharter.org is based on website domain, social profile, employee email alignment, profile-domain association, and profile association confidence.
Email usability mix
Strong current professional email coverage
AeroLeads source data includes 20 unique visible email signals; 15 are marked current or verified and 15 are professional-type. Raw addresses are hidden.
Contact data safety
Limited privacy-safe contact intelligence
AeroLeads exposes contact counts, channel mix, freshness, and domain-alignment evidence while hiding raw email addresses and masking phone numbers in public output.
Company signal breadth
Multi-signal company record
Company-level signals include social audience, company maturity, ownership, and funding.
Company momentum score
Limited company momentum score
Momentum score blends contactability and peer position from AeroLeads company and profile evidence.
Company ownership signal
Company type signal
Company source record includes source type Educational.
Audience density
Low audience density
284 followers against 56 employee estimate, about 5.10 followers per estimated employee.
Specialty signals
1
Specialty tags in the company record.
Market specificity
Tagged market profile
2 category and specialty signals in the company record.
Peer industry clusters
9
Industries represented by related company records.
Related companies
10
Company graph links available for comparison.
Industry benchmark
Evidence-backed industry benchmark
Industry benchmark uses 10 related companies, 1 same-industry peer, 3 benchmark dimensions, and 4 peer evidence types from the AeroLeads related-company graph.
Peer benchmark confidence
Multi-signal peer benchmark evidence
Peer benchmark combines 10 related companies with peer graph strength, size benchmark, and size position. Underlying peer graph includes 4 evidence types: industry context, employee benchmarks, website records, social profiles.
Peer position benchmark
Employee-scale peer position benchmark
Peer-position benchmark shows employee scale above 50% of 10 comparable related peers.
Peer comparison matrix
Limited peer comparison
Compares this company with related-company evidence across employee scale and peer graph evidence.
Workforce locations
7
Locations represented in visible profile signals.
Workforce distribution
Distributed workforce
Visible profile location signals are spread across 7 locations.
Workforce location footprint
Multi-city workforce footprint
Visible profile locations span 7 cities across 1 country, led by Salt Lake City.
Workforce distribution model
Broad distributed workforce model
Visible profile locations are spread across 7 workforce locations, with Salt Lake City, Utah, United States as the largest hub at 38%.
Workforce geography evidence confidence
High-confidence workforce geography evidence
Workforce geography spans 7 locations across 13 visible profile signals, with reachable evidence across 7 locations and company-domain evidence across 5 locations. Top workforce hub matches company location.
Contactable workforce locations
7
Workforce locations represented by visible contact samples.
Top contactable workforce location
Salt Lake City Metropolitan Area, United States
Visible contact samples span 7 workforce locations, led by Salt Lake City Metropolitan Area, United States.
Workforce seniority tiers
4
Seniority bands derived from visible profile titles and levels.
Seniority evidence confidence
High-confidence seniority evidence
Seniority graph spans 14 classified profile signals across 4 tiers, with reachable evidence for 11 and company-domain evidence for 8. Contributor-heavy visible sample.
Classified seniority profiles
14
Visible profiles with usable seniority signals.
Official-domain seniority profiles
Multi-profile official-domain seniority evidence
8 seniority-classified profiles across 3 tiers include company-domain email signals.
Management-to-IC proxy
Contributor-heavy visible sample
5 managerial seniority signals and 9 contributor signals appear in the visible seniority-classified sample.
Role title diversity
Diverse role title sample
13 distinct role titles across 14 visible titled profiles.
Visible role titles
13
Distinct role titles found in visible profile signals.
Business function mix
Mixed business-function workforce sample
AeroLeads maps 3 visible profile signals into 2 business functions; 2 include visible contact data.
Mapped business functions
2
Business functions inferred from visible profile titles and departments.
Functional team estimates
Engineering team estimate
AeroLeads derives 1 visible engineering team profile signal from mapped business-function signals.
Functional coverage gaps
Limited function coverage map
Visible people signals cover 1 of 8 core business functions. Not observed in the visible graph: Sales / revenue, Marketing / growth, Product / design, and People / HR. Treat this as a coverage gap, not confirmed absence.
Contactable role titles
11
Distinct role titles with visible contact samples.
Contactable role coverage
Diverse contactable role coverage
11 reachable role titles across 11 contactable titled profiles.
Decision-maker signals
5
Visible profiles matching seniority or leadership title patterns.
Decision-maker reachability
High decision-maker reachability
Most mapped decision-maker signals include visible contact data.
Buying committee evidence confidence
Mapped buying committee
Mapped decision-maker signals span 2 business functions.
Buyer persona availability
Dual-persona buyer availability
Mapped decision-maker evidence covers Executive buyer and Technology buyer; 1 of 2 buyer personas include visible contact data.
Decision-maker contactability rate
80
Percent of mapped decision-maker signals with visible contact data.
Official-domain decision-maker coverage
Partial official-domain decision-maker coverage
Some contactable decision-maker signals use diacharter.org email coverage.
Official-domain decision-maker contacts
2
Contactable decision-maker signals with official-domain email coverage.
Best covered outreach path
General + Executive
Coverage combines 7 visible General contact signals, 2 contactable Executive decision-maker signals, and 2 official-domain decision-maker email signals.
Prospecting fit
Strong prospecting fit
Dual Immersion Academy shows strong prospecting fit based on person-level contact coverage, best covered outreach path, decision-maker coverage, and people graph depth.
ICP fit
Strong ICP fit
Dual Immersion Academy matches the strong ICP fit band for common outbound filters based on company size, market specificity, contactability, buying committee, and domain trust.
Account research checklist
Multi-step account research checklist
Account research checklist combines best covered outreach path, buying-committee coverage, ICP fit, related-company graph, domain trust, and people graph depth; raw contact values are hidden.
Intelligence signal groups
24
AeroLeads signal groups available for this company.

Market focus signals

Primary industry
Primary and Secondary Education
Market specificity
Tagged market profile
2 category and specialty signals in the company record.
Market evidence tier
High-confidence market evidence
Market evidence combines 7 classification signals from categories, specialties, related peer industries, and description keywords. 6 description-backed keyword signals are included.
Industry benchmark
Evidence-backed industry benchmark
Industry benchmark uses 10 related companies, 1 same-industry peer, 3 benchmark dimensions, and 4 peer evidence types from the AeroLeads related-company graph.
Top peer industry
Business Consulting and Services
20% of 10 related peer industry signals.
Peer benchmark evidence
Multi-signal peer benchmark evidence
Peer benchmark combines 10 related companies with peer graph strength, size benchmark, and size position. Underlying peer graph includes 4 evidence types: industry context, employee benchmarks, website records, social profiles.
Size position
Near peer median size
5 related employee-estimated peers are higher and 5 are lower.
Peer graph strength
Benchmark-ready peer graph
Related peer graph has industry context, employee benchmarks, website records, and social profiles across 10 related companies.
Benchmark dimensions: peer graph strength, size benchmark, and size position.
Categories
Primary and Secondary Education
Specialties
đź’ˇ
Product-market keyword evidence
Description-backed market keywords
Keyword evidence comes from 3 source field groups: Category, Specialty, Description.
Product-market keyword evidence tier: High-confidence product-market keyword evidence. Product-market keyword evidence combines 8 unique market keywords, 3 source field groups, and 6 description-backed keywords (1 category, 1 specialty, and 6 description).
Primary and Secondary Education · Category 💡 · Specialty accredited tuition free · Description 8th grade dia · Description glendale area · Description salt lake city · Description create bilingual biliterate · Description multi cultural · Description
Related peer industries
Peer-industry evidence tier: High-confidence peer-industry evidence. Peer-industry evidence combines 10 related companies, 5 peer-industry clusters, and top peer industry Business Consulting and Services at 20.0%.
Functional coverage gaps
Limited function coverage map
Visible people signals cover 1 of 8 core business functions. Not observed in the visible graph: Sales / revenue, Marketing / growth, Product / design, and People / HR. Treat this as a coverage gap, not confirmed absence.
Transparent function coverage evidence: Function coverage evidence combines observed functions Technology / data and 7 unobserved core functions in the visible graph.
Business Consulting and Services 2 peers
20.0% of related peer industries
Government Administration 1 peer
10.0% of related peer industries
Food and Beverage Services 1 peer
10.0% of related peer industries
Primary and Secondary Education 1 peer
10.0% of related peer industries
Advertising Services 1 peer
10.0% of related peer industries

Company signals

Company signal breadth
Multi-signal company record
Company-level signals include social audience, company maturity, ownership, and funding.
Multi-signal company record evidence: Company record evidence combines 4 source-backed company signal types: social audience, company maturity, ownership, and funding.
Social audience
284
Followers in the company source record.
Social audience evidence tier: Limited social-audience evidence. Social audience evidence uses 284 followers from source field social_followers.
Audience density
Low audience density
284 followers against 56 employee estimate, about 5.10 followers per estimated employee.
Audience-density evidence tier: Limited audience-density evidence. Audience-density evidence combines 284 social followers, 56 employee estimate, and 5.10 followers per estimated employee.
Company maturity
Scaling company history
Company source record includes founding year 2007, about 19 years before 2026.
Company maturity evidence tier: Founding-year maturity evidence. Maturity evidence combines founding year 2007, 19 years of company history, and source field founded.
Company ownership
Company type signal
Company source record includes source type Educational.
Company ownership evidence tier: Structured ownership evidence. Ownership evidence combines source type Educational from structured company source fields.
Funding
Funding data
Funding evidence tier: Limited funding evidence. Funding evidence combines 1 named investor from structured company source fields.
Named investor signal: Funding data names 1 investor in the company source record.
relations

Workforce composition

Department concentration
Department-concentrated workforce
Most mapped workforce signals are in General. 93.9% of mapped department signals are in the largest department.
Department concentration evidence tier: Concentrated department evidence. Department concentration evidence combines 3 mapped departments, top department General, and 93.9% top-department share.
Department leadership coverage
Broad department leadership coverage
Leadership signals appear across 2 of 3 mapped departments. Leadership signals represent 12.1% of mapped department signals.
Department leadership evidence tier: Corroborated department leadership evidence. Department leadership evidence combines 4 leadership signals, 2 of 3 mapped departments, and 12.1% leadership density.
Department seniority map
Multi-department seniority map
Visible department samples map 11 seniority-classified profiles across 3 departments and 4 seniority bands.
Department seniority evidence tier: High-confidence department seniority evidence. Department seniority evidence combines 11 seniority-classified profiles, 3 departments, 4 seniority bands, and top cell General + Individual contributor with 7 profiles.
General 9 profiles
Executive: 1 Manager: 1 Individual contributor: 7
Executive 1 profile
Director: 1
Healthcare 1 profile
Individual contributor: 1
4 leadership signals 3 departments with visible contacts
Department leader sample
Department leader sample
4 contactable 3 official-domain

AeroLeads source data includes 4 leadership signals across 2 departments; rows show titles and contact-channel presence only.

Department leader evidence tier: High-confidence department leader evidence. Department leader evidence combines 4 leadership signals, 2 departments, 4 contactable, and 3 official-domain; raw contacts are hidden.

Multi-department official-domain leaders: 3 department leader samples across 2 departments include company-domain email signals.

Leader Department Seniority Channel
Mariana Granda
Office Manager at Dual Immersion Academy
General Manager Email
Janette Fiagle
Director of Assessment, Rti, Title Iii
Executive Director Email
Katherine Maalona
Afterschool Leader at Dual Immersion Academy
General Individual contributor Email
Enoc Tapia Mendoza
Spanish Dual Immersion Educator. Future School Owner.
General Executive Email
General 31 signals
93.9% of mapped department signals, 3 leadership signals, 7 visible contacts
Executive 1 signals
3.0% of mapped department signals, 1 leadership signals, 1 visible contact
Healthcare 1 signals
3.0% of mapped department signals, 1 visible contact

Workforce seniority mix

Aggregated from 14 classified profile signals.

Largest seniority band
Individual contributor
9 of 14 classified profile signals, 7 with visible contact data, 6 official-domain.
Multi-profile official-domain seniority evidence: 8 seniority-classified profiles across 3 tiers include company-domain email signals.
High-confidence seniority evidence: Seniority graph spans 14 classified profile signals across 4 tiers, with reachable evidence for 11 and company-domain evidence for 8. Contributor-heavy visible sample.
Management-to-IC proxy
Contributor-heavy visible sample
35.7%
managerial seniority signals
64.3%
contributor seniority signals
5 managerial seniority signals and 9 contributor signals appear in the visible seniority-classified sample.
Management-shape evidence tier: Contributor-heavy management-shape evidence. Management-shape evidence combines 14 seniority-classified signals, 5 managerial signals, 35.7% managerial share, and 9 contributor signals.
Individual contributor 9 profiles
64.3% of classified seniority signals, 7 with visible contact data, 6 official-domain
Executive 2 profiles
14.3% of classified seniority signals, 2 with visible contact data
Director 2 profiles
14.3% of classified seniority signals, 1 with visible contact data, 1 official-domain
Manager 1 profile
7.1% of classified seniority signals, 1 with visible contact data, 1 official-domain

Workforce geography

Aggregated from 13 visible profile location signals.

Workforce geography evidence
High-confidence workforce geography evidence
Workforce geography spans 7 locations across 13 visible profile signals, with reachable evidence across 7 locations and company-domain evidence across 5 locations. Top workforce hub matches company location.
Distribution signal
Distributed workforce
Visible profile location signals are spread across 7 locations.
Workforce distribution model
Broad distributed workforce model
Visible profile locations are spread across 7 workforce locations, with Salt Lake City, Utah, United States as the largest hub at 38%.
Corroborated workforce model evidence: Workforce model evidence combines 13 located profile signals, 7 workforce locations, 7 cities, 1 country, top hub Salt Lake City, Utah, United States at 38%, company-location alignment, 7 reachable locations, and 5 company-domain locations.
Locations
7
Countries
1
Top hub share
38%
Workforce location footprint
Multi-city workforce footprint
Visible profile locations span 7 cities across 1 country, led by Salt Lake City.
Cities
7
Countries
1
Company-location alignment
Top workforce hub matches company location
The largest visible workforce location is Salt Lake City, Utah, United States, matching the company location Salt Lake City, Utah, United States.
Top workforce hub share: 38.5%
Company-location evidence tier: High-confidence company-location alignment evidence. Company-location alignment evidence combines company location Salt Lake City, Utah, United States, top workforce hub Salt Lake City, Utah, United States, 38.5% top workforce hub share, and locality match.
Contactable location spread
Multi-location contact coverage
Visible contact samples span 7 workforce locations, led by Salt Lake City Metropolitan Area, United States.
Contactable location evidence tier: High-confidence contactable location evidence. Contactable location evidence combines 11 contactable profile location signals, 7 workforce locations, top contactable hub Salt Lake City Metropolitan Area, United States at 27.3%, and company-location alignment.
Contactable workforce hub shares company country: The largest contactable workforce location is Salt Lake City Metropolitan Area, United States, in the same country as company location Salt Lake City, Utah, United States. Top contactable hub share: 27.3%.
Salt Lake City Metropolitan Area, United States 3 contacts
27.3% of contactable location signals
Salt Lake City, Utah, United States 3 contacts
27.3% of contactable location signals
Orem, Utah, United States 1 contact
9.1% of contactable location signals
Denver, Colorado, United States 1 contact
9.1% of contactable location signals
Provo, Utah, United States 1 contact
9.1% of contactable location signals
Official-domain location spread
Multi-location official-domain workforce
Company-domain email profile locations span 5 workforce locations, led by Salt Lake City, Utah, United States.
8 profiles with diacharter.org email evidence include location signals.
Official-domain location evidence tier: High-confidence official-domain location evidence. Official-domain location evidence combines 8 official-domain profile location signals, 5 workforce locations, top official-domain hub Salt Lake City, Utah, United States at 37.5%, and company-location alignment.
Official-domain workforce hub matches company location: The largest company-domain email workforce location is Salt Lake City, Utah, United States, matching the company location Salt Lake City, Utah, United States. Top official-domain hub share: 37.5%.
Salt Lake City, Utah, United States 3 profiles
37.5% of official-domain location signals
Salt Lake City Metropolitan Area, United States 2 profiles
25.0% of official-domain location signals
Orem, Utah, United States 1 profile
12.5% of official-domain location signals
North Salt Lake, Utah, United States 1 profile
12.5% of official-domain location signals
Sandy, Utah, United States 1 profile
12.5% of official-domain location signals
Salt Lake City, Utah, United States 5 profiles
38.5% of visible location signals
Salt Lake City Metropolitan Area, United States 3 profiles
23.1% of visible location signals
Orem, Utah, United States 1 profile
7.7% of visible location signals
Denver, Colorado, United States 1 profile
7.7% of visible location signals
Provo, Utah, United States 1 profile
7.7% of visible location signals
North Salt Lake, Utah, United States 1 profile
7.7% of visible location signals

Decision-maker coverage

5 seniority signals, 4 with visible contact data.

Decision-maker evidence tier
Corroborated decision-maker evidence
Decision-maker evidence covers 5 seniority signals, 4 reachable, and 2 company-domain. Buying committee spans 2 functions.
Account planning snapshot
Multi-signal account planning snapshot
Snapshot combines department reachability, decision-maker coverage, and buying-committee function aggregates.
4 account-planning evidence cards available.
Account planning evidence tier: Multi-source account planning evidence. Account planning evidence combines 4 aggregate account-planning cards, best covered outreach path, 1 reachable buying-committee function, 2 official-domain decision-maker signals, Executive seniority reachability, and General department contactability; raw contacts are hidden.
Best covered path
General + Executive
Coverage combines 7 visible General contact signals, 2 contactable Executive decision-maker signals, and 2 official-domain decision-maker email signals.
Reachable buying committee
1 of 2 functions
Reachable functions include Executive / corporate.
Most reachable seniority
Executive
2 of 2 signals in this seniority band include visible contact data.
Top reachable team
General
7 visible contact signals in this department sample.
High decision-maker reachability 80.0%
Most mapped decision-maker signals include visible contact data.
Decision-maker reachability evidence tier: High decision-maker reachability evidence. Decision-maker reachability evidence combines 4 contactable decision-maker signals, 5 mapped decision-maker signals, 80.0% contactability, 2 official-domain decision-maker signals, and 1 dual-channel signal.
Email and phone decision-maker coverage: Mapped decision-maker signals include 4 email signals, 1 phone signal, and 1 with both channels.
Buying committee function coverage
Multi-function buying-committee coverage
1 of 2 mapped functions include visible decision-maker contact data.
Mapped buying committee: Mapped decision-maker signals span 2 business functions.
Buying committee evidence tier: Mapped buying-committee evidence. Buying-committee evidence combines 2 mapped buying-committee functions, 1 contactable function, and Executive / corporate and Technology / data function coverage.
Buyer persona availability: Dual-persona buyer availability. Mapped decision-maker evidence covers Executive buyer and Technology buyer; 1 of 2 buyer personas include visible contact data. Reachable buyer persona evidence: Buyer persona evidence combines 2 mapped buyer personas, 1 contactable persona, and Executive buyer and Technology buyer coverage.
Executive / corporate: 2 contactable Technology / data
Most reachable seniority
Executive
2 of 2 seniority signals include visible contact data.
Seniority reachability evidence tier: Corroborated seniority reachability evidence. Seniority reachability evidence combines 2 contactable Executive signals, 2 Executive signals, 100.0% tier contactability, and email and phone coverage.
Official-domain decision-maker coverage
Partial official-domain decision-maker coverage
2 contactable decision-maker signals match diacharter.org. Some contactable decision-maker signals use diacharter.org email coverage.
Official-domain decision-maker evidence tier: Partial official-domain decision-maker evidence. Official-domain decision-maker evidence combines 2 official-domain decision-maker signals, 4 contactable decision-maker signals, 50.0% official-domain coverage, and diacharter.org domain match.
Executive 2 profiles
40.0% of mapped seniority signals, 2 with visible contact data
Director 2 profiles
40.0% of mapped seniority signals, 1 with visible contact data
Manager 1 profile
20.0% of mapped seniority signals, 1 with visible contact data

Role and function mix

14 visible titled profiles across 13 distinct role titles.

Title mix
Diverse role title sample
13 distinct role titles across 14 visible titled profiles.
Role-title evidence tier: Diverse role-title evidence. Role-title diversity evidence combines 14 visible titled profiles, 13 distinct role titles, and top title Teacher at Dual Immersion Academy at 14.3%.
Business function mix
Mixed business-function workforce sample
AeroLeads maps 3 visible profile signals into 2 business functions; 2 include visible contact data.
Business-function evidence tier: Corroborated business-function evidence. Business-function evidence combines 3 mapped function profile signals, 2 business functions, 2 contactable signals, 1 contactable function, and top function Executive / corporate at 66.7%.
Single-function contactability map 1 / 2 functions
1 of 2 mapped business functions include visible contact data.
Functional team estimates
Engineering team estimate
AeroLeads derives 1 visible engineering team profile signal from mapped business-function signals.
Mapped functional team evidence: Functional team estimate evidence combines 1 visible engineering team profile signal.
Engineering team estimate 1 profile
33.3% of mapped function signals; Technology / data
Executive / corporate 2 profiles
66.7% of mapped function signals, 2 with visible contact data
Technology / data 1 profile
33.3% of mapped function signals
Contactable role coverage
Diverse contactable role coverage
11 reachable role titles across 11 contactable titled profiles.
Contactable role evidence tier: Diverse contactable role evidence. Contactable role evidence combines 11 contactable titled profiles, 11 reachable role titles, and top reachable role Afterschool Leader at Dual Immersion Academy at 9.1%.
Role title reachability
Broad role-title reachability
11 of 13 distinct visible role titles include email or phone signals.
Role-title reachability evidence tier: Corroborated role-title reachability evidence. Role-title reachability evidence combines 13 visible role titles, 11 reachable titles, 84.6% title reachability, and 8 official-domain titles.
Multi-title official-domain reachability 8 / 13 titles
8 of 13 distinct visible role titles include email signals matching diacharter.org.
Teacher at Dual Immersion Academy 2 profiles
14.3% of visible titled profiles
Afterschool Leader at Dual Immersion Academy 1 profile
7.1% of visible titled profiles
CEO, Entrepreneur, Small-business 1 profile
7.1% of visible titled profiles
Director of Assessment, Rti, Title Iii 1 profile
7.1% of visible titled profiles
Director of Software Engineering 1 profile
7.1% of visible titled profiles
Head Soccer Coach at Dual Immersion Academy 1 profile
7.1% of visible titled profiles

Contactability signals

Contactability score 75.0%
3 of 4 visible profiles include email or phone signals.
Contact channel mix
Multi-channel contact coverage
Visible profile or company source data includes email and phone channels.
Contact evidence tier
High-confidence contact evidence
15 current or verified professional email signals, and multi-channel contact coverage; raw addresses and numbers are hidden.
Contact data safety
Limited privacy-safe contact intelligence
AeroLeads exposes contact counts, channel mix, freshness, and domain-alignment evidence while hiding raw email addresses and masking phone numbers in public output.
Aggregate signals
3
Channel coverage
Email and phone aggregate coverage
Evidence groups
2
Limited contact-safety evidence: Contact-safety evidence combines visible profile contact sample and current email metadata; public schema uses aggregate variables only.
Aggregate-only contact schema: Dataset variables use counts, rates, channel labels, freshness bands, and domain-alignment metrics instead of raw contact values.
Best covered outreach path
General + Executive
Coverage combines 7 visible General contact signals, 2 contactable Executive decision-maker signals, and 2 official-domain decision-maker email signals.
Outreach path evidence tier: Corroborated outreach path evidence. Outreach path evidence combines 7 visible General contact signals, 2 contactable Executive decision-maker signals, and 2 official-domain decision-maker email signals; raw contacts are hidden.
Email usability mix
Strong current professional email coverage
AeroLeads source data includes 20 unique visible email signals; 15 are marked current or verified and 15 are professional-type. Raw addresses are hidden.
Email usability evidence tier: High-confidence email usability evidence. Email usability evidence combines 20 unique email signals, 15 current or verified, 1 verified, 15 professional-type, and 75.0% current signal rate; raw addresses are hidden.
15 current or verified 15 professional-type 75.0% current signal rate
Visible people
4
With contact data
3
Email coverage
3
75.0% of visible profiles
Phone coverage
2
50.0% of visible profiles

Email domain intelligence

12 of 20 visible email signals match diacharter.org.

Mixed-domain coverage: Visible email signals include official-domain and non-official domains.
Email identity evidence tier: Corroborated email identity evidence. Email identity evidence combines 20 visible email signals, 12 matching diacharter.org, 8 people with official-domain email, 60.0% official-domain match, 4 other-domain signals, and 4 personal-domain signals.
60.0% domain match 8 people with official-domain email 8 non-official email signals

Department contact samples

Broad department contact spread: Visible contact samples appear across 3 of 3 mapped departments.
Department contactability evidence tier: Corroborated department contactability evidence. Department contactability evidence combines 9 visible contact samples, 3 of 3 mapped departments, 9 email signals, and 8 official-domain email signals; raw contacts are hidden.
Contactability heatmap
Email-led department contact map
Department samples show 9 email signals and 0 phone signals across 3 contactable departments.
General Email
Email7
Phone0
Executive Email
Email1
Phone0
Healthcare Email
Email1
Phone0
Official-domain department coverage
Full official-domain department coverage
3 of 3 mapped departments include visible company-domain email signals.
Department Contacts Email Official email Phone
General 7 7 6 0
Executive 1 1 1 0
Healthcare 1 1 1 0
Top email pattern: first.last at 83.3% of matched patterns.
Format example: [first].[last]@diacharter.org
Dominant pattern: One email pattern accounts for most matched examples.
Email pattern evidence tier: High-confidence email pattern evidence. Email pattern evidence combines 2 matched patterns, 83.3% top-pattern share, format example for diacharter.org, and secondary pattern variants.
first.last 83.3%
flast 16.7%
3 of 4 visible Dual Immersion Academy profiles include email or phone signals. Review people graph
The strongest Dual Immersion Academy email pattern signal is [first].[last] , representing 83.33% of matched email-pattern evidence in the AeroLeads company graph.
Other observed email-pattern signals for Dual Immersion Academy are [first_initial][last] .
In total, AeroLeads has detected 2 aggregate email-pattern signals for Dual Immersion Academy. View the detailed email format page .

Dual Immersion Academy Email Pattern Intelligence Snapshot

These aggregate patterns support the company intelligence page. The dedicated email-format workflow lives on Dual Immersion Academy email format .

Observed pattern
Example pattern
[first].[last]
[first].[last]@diacharter.org
83%
[first_initial][last]
[first_initial][last]@diacharter.org
16%

Dual Immersion Academy Questions

Dual Immersion Academy people graph sample