Great Point Insurance
Company intelligence

Great Point Insurance Company Intelligence, Employees & Contact Signals

Contact coverage
Email + phone
Visible profile or company source data includes email and phone channels. 4 visible profiles include direct contact evidence.
People graph depth
4 signals
4 mapped workforce signals against a 10 employee size estimate.
Account research
5 steps
Account research checklist combines person-level contact coverage, ICP fit, related-company graph, domain trust, and people graph depth; raw contact values are hidden.
Email domain match
11% match
Official-domain coverage across 1 of 9 visible email signals for greatpointins.com.
Evidence quality 100/100 Priority intelligence record

AeroLeads company intelligence

Great Point Insurance workforce and contactability signals

Evidence from AeroLeads company records, matched professional profiles, and related company graph.

High confidence
Intelligence completeness
Partial intelligence record
5 of 11 major intelligence groups are available for this company.
Profile graph
Deep profile graph
4 mapped workforce signals against a 10 employee size estimate.
Top seniority band
Individual contributor
3 of 4 classified profile signals.
Visible contact sample
4
Displayed people with email or phone data.
Social followers
40
Audience size from company social data.

Profile graph researchability

Visible people graph includes 4 visible people: 4 named, 4 titled, 4 located, and 4 contactable.

Profile research sample
Profile coverage evidence tier: Deep profile coverage evidence. Profile coverage evidence combines 4 mapped workforce signals, 10 employee size estimate, and 40.0% profile graph coverage.
Corroborated profile graph evidence: Researchability is based on 4 visible people with 4 populated evidence dimensions: named, titled, located, and contactable signals.
Profile association confidence: Profile association sample. Association confidence combines 4 titled profiles, 1 official-domain email profile, 1 titled profiles with official-domain email, 1 located profiles with official-domain email, and 4 contactable profiles.
People
4
Named
4
Titled
4
Located
4
Contactable
4

Data methodology

AeroLeads renders only source-backed fields for this company page.

5 source groups
Company record Matched profile graph Email-pattern aggregate Related company graph Company signal fields
Blank source fields are omitted
Related companies are ordered deterministically
Structured data uses aggregate counts only

Intelligence completeness

5 of 11 major intelligence groups are available for this company.

5 / 11 groups
Partial intelligence record 45.5%
Workforce composition Contactability Email intelligence Domain confidence Market and peer context

Evidence quality

This page clears the 60+ AeroLeads company-intelligence evidence threshold.

100 / 100
Priority intelligence record Threshold 60+
Employee email coverage Employee phone coverage Role title reachability Official-domain role title reachability Email usability mix Related company graph
Contactability
10 signals
Employee email coverage, Employee phone coverage, Email usability mix
Workforce graph
16 signals
Role title reachability, Official-domain role title reachability, Profile graph researchability
Market and peer context
14 signals
Related company graph, Peer graph strength, Peer position benchmark
Company momentum
3 signals
Company signal breadth, Company momentum score, Company ownership signal
Source trust
9 signals
Domain confidence, Multi-source domain alignment, Intelligence completeness
Decision-maker intelligence
1 signal
Account research checklist
47 additional source-backed evidence signals are counted in this page quality score.

Prospecting readiness

Great Point Insurance shows research-first prospecting fit based on person-level contact coverage, people graph depth, and peer context.

35 / 100
Research-first prospecting fit Corroborated prospecting evidence

Prospecting evidence combines person-level contact coverage, people graph depth, and peer context; raw contact values are hidden.

ICP fit
Qualified ICP fit

ICP fit combines company size, market specificity, contactability, and domain trust; raw contact values are hidden.

60 / 100
Company size
10 employees
Employee estimate is in a common outbound prospecting range.
Market specificity
Tagged market profile
2 category and specialty signals in the company record.
Reachability
High-confidence contact evidence
2 current or verified professional email signals, and multi-channel contact coverage; raw addresses and numbers are hidden.
Domain trust
Corroborated domain alignment
Domain evidence combines website domain, social profile, employee email alignment, and profile-domain association; raw email addresses are hidden.
Account research checklist
Source-backed account research checklist

Account research checklist combines person-level contact coverage, ICP fit, related-company graph, domain trust, and people graph depth; raw contact values are hidden.

5 steps
Confirm contact coverage
High-confidence contact evidence
2 current or verified professional email signals, and multi-channel contact coverage; raw addresses and numbers are hidden.
Validate ICP fit
Qualified ICP fit
ICP fit combines company size, market specificity, contactability, and domain trust; raw contact values are hidden.
Compare related peers
Limited peer comparison
Compares this company with related-company evidence across employee scale and peer graph evidence.
Check domain trust
Corroborated domain alignment
Domain evidence combines website domain, social profile, employee email alignment, and profile-domain association; raw email addresses are hidden.
Review people graph depth
Deep profile graph
4 mapped workforce signals against a 10 employee size estimate.
Contact coverage
High-confidence contact evidence
2 current or verified professional email signals, and multi-channel contact coverage; raw addresses and numbers are hidden.
People graph depth
Deep profile graph
4 mapped workforce signals against a 10 employee size estimate.
Peer context
Multi-signal peer benchmark evidence
Peer benchmark combines 10 related companies with peer graph strength, size benchmark, and size position. Underlying peer graph includes 4 evidence types: industry context, employee benchmarks, website records, social profiles.
Decision-maker evidence missing: No mapped decision-maker cluster is strong enough to summarize.

Domain trust signals

Domain confidence for greatpointins.com is based on website domain, social profile, employee email alignment, and profile-domain association.

70 / 100
Corroborated domain alignment Corroborated domain evidence

Domain evidence combines website domain, social profile, employee email alignment, and profile-domain association; raw email addresses are hidden.

Website domain
greatpointins.com
The official website domain is available from the company source record.
Social profile
LinkedIn organization page
A LinkedIn organization page is present for this company record.
Employee email alignment
1 official-domain email signals
11% of visible employee email signals match greatpointins.com; raw addresses are hidden.
Profile-domain association
1 people with official-domain email
Matched people include official-domain email evidence; raw addresses are hidden.

AeroLeads coverage snapshot

Profile sample
4
Visible people attached to this company page.
Profile graph depth
Deep profile graph
4 mapped workforce signals against a 10 employee size estimate.
Contactable sample
4
Visible people with email or phone data.
Contact channel mix
Multi-channel contact coverage
Visible profile or company source data includes email and phone channels.
Contact evidence confidence
High-confidence contact evidence
2 current or verified professional email signals, and multi-channel contact coverage; raw addresses and numbers are hidden.
Official-domain emails
1
Email signals matching greatpointins.com.
Email domain confidence
Mixed-domain coverage
Visible email signals include official-domain and non-official domains.
Domain confidence
Corroborated domain alignment
Domain confidence for greatpointins.com is based on website domain, social profile, employee email alignment, and profile-domain association.
Email usability mix
Current email coverage sample
AeroLeads source data includes 9 unique visible email signals; 2 are marked current or verified and 5 are professional-type. Raw addresses are hidden.
Contact data safety
Limited privacy-safe contact intelligence
AeroLeads exposes contact counts, channel mix, freshness, and domain-alignment evidence while hiding raw email addresses and masking phone numbers in public output.
Company signal breadth
Multi-signal company record
Company-level signals include social audience, company maturity, and ownership.
Company momentum score
Limited company momentum score
Momentum score blends contactability and peer position from AeroLeads company and profile evidence.
Company ownership signal
Private company record
Company source record includes source type Privately Held.
Audience density
Low audience density
40 followers against 10 employee estimate, about 4 followers per estimated employee.
Specialty signals
1
Specialty tags in the company record.
Market specificity
Tagged market profile
2 category and specialty signals in the company record.
Peer industry clusters
3
Industries represented by related company records.
Related companies
10
Company graph links available for comparison.
Industry benchmark
Evidence-backed industry benchmark
Industry benchmark uses 10 related companies, 8 same-industry peers, 3 benchmark dimensions, and 4 peer evidence types from the AeroLeads related-company graph.
Peer benchmark confidence
Multi-signal peer benchmark evidence
Peer benchmark combines 10 related companies with peer graph strength, size benchmark, and size position. Underlying peer graph includes 4 evidence types: industry context, employee benchmarks, website records, social profiles.
Peer position benchmark
Employee-scale peer position benchmark
Peer-position benchmark shows employee scale above 22.2% of 9 comparable related peers.
Peer comparison matrix
Limited peer comparison
Compares this company with related-company evidence across employee scale and peer graph evidence.
Workforce locations
4
Locations represented in visible profile signals.
Workforce distribution
Distributed workforce
Visible profile location signals are spread across 4 locations.
Workforce location footprint
Multi-city workforce footprint
Visible profile locations span 4 cities across 1 country, led by St Louis.
Workforce distribution model
Workforce hub outside company location
The largest visible workforce hub is St Louis, Missouri, United States, while the company location is 500 W Putnam Ave.
Workforce geography evidence confidence
Corroborated workforce geography evidence
Workforce geography spans 4 locations across 4 visible profile signals, with reachable evidence across 4 locations. Top workforce hub differs from company location.
Contactable workforce locations
4
Workforce locations represented by visible contact samples.
Top contactable workforce location
St Louis, Missouri, United States
Visible contact samples span 4 workforce locations, led by St Louis, Missouri, United States.
Workforce seniority tiers
2
Seniority bands derived from visible profile titles and levels.
Seniority evidence confidence
Corroborated seniority evidence
Seniority graph spans 4 classified profile signals across 2 tiers, with reachable evidence for 4 and company-domain evidence for 1. Contributor-heavy visible sample.
Classified seniority profiles
4
Visible profiles with usable seniority signals.
Official-domain seniority profiles
Official-domain seniority evidence
1 seniority-classified profile across 1 tier includes company-domain email signals.
Management-to-IC proxy
Contributor-heavy visible sample
0 managerial seniority signals and 4 contributor signals appear in the visible seniority-classified sample.
Role title diversity
Diverse role title sample
4 distinct role titles across 4 visible titled profiles.
Visible role titles
4
Distinct role titles found in visible profile signals.
Contactable role titles
4
Distinct role titles with visible contact samples.
Contactable role coverage
Diverse contactable role coverage
4 reachable role titles across 4 contactable titled profiles.
Prospecting fit
Research-first prospecting fit
Great Point Insurance shows research-first prospecting fit based on person-level contact coverage, people graph depth, and peer context.
ICP fit
Qualified ICP fit
Great Point Insurance matches the qualified ICP fit band for common outbound filters based on company size, market specificity, contactability, and domain trust.
Account research checklist
Source-backed account research checklist
Account research checklist combines person-level contact coverage, ICP fit, related-company graph, domain trust, and people graph depth; raw contact values are hidden.
Intelligence signal groups
13
AeroLeads signal groups available for this company.

Market focus signals

Primary industry
Insurance
Market specificity
Tagged market profile
2 category and specialty signals in the company record.
Market evidence tier
Corroborated market evidence
Market evidence combines 5 classification signals from categories, specialties, related peer industries, and description keywords. 6 description-backed keyword signals are included.
Industry benchmark
Evidence-backed industry benchmark
Industry benchmark uses 10 related companies, 8 same-industry peers, 3 benchmark dimensions, and 4 peer evidence types from the AeroLeads related-company graph.
Top peer industry
Insurance
80% of 10 related peer industry signals.
Peer benchmark evidence
Multi-signal peer benchmark evidence
Peer benchmark combines 10 related companies with peer graph strength, size benchmark, and size position. Underlying peer graph includes 4 evidence types: industry context, employee benchmarks, website records, social profiles.
Size position
Smaller than most related peers
7 of 9 related employee-estimated peers are higher.
Peer graph strength
Benchmark-ready peer graph
Related peer graph has industry context, employee benchmarks, website records, and social profiles across 10 related companies.
Benchmark dimensions: peer graph strength, size benchmark, and size position.
Categories
Insurance
Specialties
Insurance
Product-market keyword evidence
Description-backed market keywords
Keyword evidence comes from 2 source field groups: Category, Description.
Product-market keyword evidence tier: Corroborated product-market keyword evidence. Product-market keyword evidence combines 7 unique market keywords, 2 source field groups, and 6 description-backed keywords (1 category and 6 description).
Insurance · Category leading commercial umbrella · Description select group · Description most recognizable · Description product line includes · Description traditional brokerage · Description national network · Description
Related peer industries
Peer-industry evidence tier: High-confidence peer-industry evidence. Peer-industry evidence combines 10 related companies, 3 peer-industry clusters, and top peer industry Insurance at 80.0%.
Insurance 8 peers
80.0% of related peer industries
Law Practice 1 peer
10.0% of related peer industries
Staffing and Recruiting 1 peer
10.0% of related peer industries

Company signals

Company signal breadth
Multi-signal company record
Company-level signals include social audience, company maturity, and ownership.
Corroborated company record evidence: Company record evidence combines 3 source-backed company signal types: social audience, company maturity, and ownership.
Social audience
40
Followers in the company source record.
Social audience evidence tier: Limited social-audience evidence. Social audience evidence uses 40 followers from source field social_followers.
Audience density
Low audience density
40 followers against 10 employee estimate, about 4 followers per estimated employee.
Audience-density evidence tier: Limited audience-density evidence. Audience-density evidence combines 40 social followers, 10 employee estimate, and 4 followers per estimated employee.
Company maturity
Mature company record
Company source record includes founding year 1999, about 27 years before 2026.
Company maturity evidence tier: Long-running maturity evidence. Maturity evidence combines founding year 1999, 27 years of company history, and source field founded.
Company ownership
Private company record
Company source record includes source type Privately Held.
Company ownership evidence tier: Structured ownership evidence. Ownership evidence combines source type Privately Held from structured company source fields.

Workforce seniority mix

Aggregated from 4 classified profile signals.

Largest seniority band
Individual contributor
3 of 4 classified profile signals, 3 with visible contact data, 1 official-domain.
Official-domain seniority evidence: 1 seniority-classified profile across 1 tier includes company-domain email signals.
Corroborated seniority evidence: Seniority graph spans 4 classified profile signals across 2 tiers, with reachable evidence for 4 and company-domain evidence for 1. Contributor-heavy visible sample.
Management-to-IC proxy
Contributor-heavy visible sample
0.0%
managerial seniority signals
100.0%
contributor seniority signals
0 managerial seniority signals and 4 contributor signals appear in the visible seniority-classified sample.
Management-shape evidence tier: Contributor-heavy management-shape evidence. Management-shape evidence combines 4 seniority-classified signals, 0 managerial signals, 0.0% managerial share, and 4 contributor signals.
Individual contributor 3 profiles
75.0% of classified seniority signals, 3 with visible contact data, 1 official-domain
Senior / Lead 1 profile
25.0% of classified seniority signals, 1 with visible contact data

Workforce geography

Aggregated from 4 visible profile location signals.

Workforce geography evidence
Corroborated workforce geography evidence
Workforce geography spans 4 locations across 4 visible profile signals, with reachable evidence across 4 locations. Top workforce hub differs from company location.
Distribution signal
Distributed workforce
Visible profile location signals are spread across 4 locations.
Workforce distribution model
Workforce hub outside company location
The largest visible workforce hub is St Louis, Missouri, United States, while the company location is 500 W Putnam Ave.
Corroborated workforce model evidence: Workforce model evidence combines 4 located profile signals, 4 workforce locations, 4 cities, 1 country, top hub St Louis, Missouri, United States at 25%, company-location alignment, and 4 reachable locations.
Locations
4
Countries
1
Top hub share
25%
Workforce location footprint
Multi-city workforce footprint
Visible profile locations span 4 cities across 1 country, led by St Louis.
Cities
4
Countries
1
Company-location alignment
Top workforce hub differs from company location
The largest visible workforce location is St Louis, Missouri, United States, while the company location is 500 W Putnam Ave.
Top workforce hub share: 25.0%
Company-location evidence tier: Workforce-location divergence evidence. Company-location alignment evidence combines company location 500 W Putnam Ave, top workforce hub St Louis, Missouri, United States, 25.0% top workforce hub share, and location difference.
Contactable location spread
Multi-location contact coverage
Visible contact samples span 4 workforce locations, led by St Louis, Missouri, United States.
Contactable location evidence tier: High-confidence contactable location evidence. Contactable location evidence combines 4 contactable profile location signals, 4 workforce locations, top contactable hub St Louis, Missouri, United States at 25.0%, and company-location alignment.
Contactable workforce hub differs from company location: The largest contactable workforce location is St Louis, Missouri, United States, while the company location is 500 W Putnam Ave. Top contactable hub share: 25.0%.
St Louis, Missouri, United States 1 contact
25.0% of contactable location signals
Greater Boston, United States 1 contact
25.0% of contactable location signals
Greater Monroe Area, United States 1 contact
25.0% of contactable location signals
New London, Connecticut, United States 1 contact
25.0% of contactable location signals
St Louis, Missouri, United States 1 profile
25.0% of visible location signals
Greater Boston, United States 1 profile
25.0% of visible location signals
Greater Monroe Area, United States 1 profile
25.0% of visible location signals
New London, Connecticut, United States 1 profile
25.0% of visible location signals

Role and function mix

4 visible titled profiles across 4 distinct role titles.

Title mix
Diverse role title sample
4 distinct role titles across 4 visible titled profiles.
Role-title evidence tier: Diverse role-title evidence. Role-title diversity evidence combines 4 visible titled profiles, 4 distinct role titles, and top title Accounts Receivable / Administration at 25.0%.
Contactable role coverage
Diverse contactable role coverage
4 reachable role titles across 4 contactable titled profiles.
Contactable role evidence tier: Diverse contactable role evidence. Contactable role evidence combines 4 contactable titled profiles, 4 reachable role titles, and top reachable role Accounts Receivable / Administration at 25.0%.
Role title reachability
Full role-title reachability
4 of 4 distinct visible role titles include email or phone signals.
Role-title reachability evidence tier: Corroborated role-title reachability evidence. Role-title reachability evidence combines 4 visible role titles, 4 reachable titles, 100.0% title reachability, and 1 official-domain title.
Single-title official-domain reachability 1 / 4 titles
1 of 4 distinct visible role titles include email signals matching greatpointins.com.
Accounts Receivable / Administration 1 profile
25.0% of visible titled profiles
Casualty Underwriter at Great Point 1 profile
25.0% of visible titled profiles
Underwriting Team Lead at Great Point 1 profile
25.0% of visible titled profiles
Underwriting Team Leader 1 profile
25.0% of visible titled profiles

Contactability signals

Contactability score 100.0%
4 of 4 visible profiles include email or phone signals.
Contact channel mix
Multi-channel contact coverage
Visible profile or company source data includes email and phone channels.
Contact evidence tier
High-confidence contact evidence
2 current or verified professional email signals, and multi-channel contact coverage; raw addresses and numbers are hidden.
Contact data safety
Limited privacy-safe contact intelligence
AeroLeads exposes contact counts, channel mix, freshness, and domain-alignment evidence while hiding raw email addresses and masking phone numbers in public output.
Aggregate signals
4
Channel coverage
Email and phone aggregate coverage
Evidence groups
2
Limited contact-safety evidence: Contact-safety evidence combines visible profile contact sample and current email metadata; public schema uses aggregate variables only.
Aggregate-only contact schema: Dataset variables use counts, rates, channel labels, freshness bands, and domain-alignment metrics instead of raw contact values.
Email usability mix
Current email coverage sample
AeroLeads source data includes 9 unique visible email signals; 2 are marked current or verified and 5 are professional-type. Raw addresses are hidden.
Email usability evidence tier: Corroborated email usability evidence. Email usability evidence combines 9 unique email signals, 2 current or verified, 5 professional-type, and 22.2% current signal rate; raw addresses are hidden.
2 current or verified 5 professional-type 22.2% current signal rate
Visible people
4
With contact data
4
Email coverage
4
100.0% of visible profiles
Phone coverage
2
50.0% of visible profiles

Email domain intelligence

1 of 9 visible email signals match greatpointins.com.

Mixed-domain coverage: Visible email signals include official-domain and non-official domains.
Email identity evidence tier: Mixed email identity evidence. Email identity evidence combines 9 visible email signals, 1 matching greatpointins.com, 1 person with official-domain email, 11.1% official-domain match, 4 other-domain signals, and 4 personal-domain signals.
11.1% domain match 1 person with official-domain email 8 non-official email signals

Explore related pages

Related company intelligence:

Great Point Insurance is the nation’s leading Commercial Umbrella Underwriting Facility. In partnership with a select group of the world’s most recognizable insurance carriers, our product line includes exclusive Purchasing Group Programs, MGA / MGU Programs and traditional Brokerage. Our products are distributed through a national network of insurance professionals throughout all 50 states and the District of Columbia. Headquartered in Greenwich, Connecticut we maintain strategic branch offices throughout the country.

Company source details

Employees
10
Founded
1999
Address
500 W Putnam Ave
Industry
Insurance
NAICS
Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Agencies, Brokerages, and Other Insurance Related Activities
Website
greatpointins.com
Keywords
Insurance.
HQ
Greenwich, Connecticut
Related companies
CNA Insurance, Grange Insurance, Egan, Flanagan & Cohen, P.C., The Insurance Guys - Kansas, Elliott Group, SNAP Insurance Service, Redstone Underwriters, A Risk Theory Company, Ambition Risk Services, Lumen Staffing LLC, UmbrellaPro.com.
Explore visible people signals for Great Point Insurance by role, title, or keyword.

4 of 4 visible profiles include email or phone signals in AeroLeads.

Great Point Insurance Questions

Great Point Insurance people graph sample