Kateb University

Kateb University Company Intelligence, Employees & Workforce Signals

People graph depth
45 signals
Deep profile graph across 5 mapped departments.
Account research
6 steps
Account research checklist combines best covered outreach path, buying-committee coverage, ICP fit, related-company graph, domain trust, and people graph depth; raw contact values are hidden.
Outreach path
Executive + Executive
Coverage combines 1 visible Executive contact signal, 1 contactable Executive decision-maker signal, and 1 official-domain decision-maker email signal.
Domain trust
High-confidence domain alignment
Domain evidence combines website domain, social profile, employee email alignment, profile-domain association, and company email sample; raw email addresses are hidden.
Evidence quality 100/100 Priority intelligence record

AeroLeads company intelligence

Kateb University workforce intelligence signals

Evidence from AeroLeads company records, matched professional profiles, and related company graph.

High confidence
Intelligence completeness
Strong intelligence record
8 of 11 major intelligence groups are available for this company.
Largest mapped team
Finance
4 profile signals in Finance.
Departments mapped
5
Workforce composition from AeroLeads profile data.
Profile graph
Deep profile graph
45 mapped workforce signals against a 52 employee size estimate.
Top reachable team
Executive
1 visible contact signal.
Top seniority band
Individual contributor
15 of 22 classified profile signals.
Technology talent
3
Technology roles and departments found in workforce signals.

Profile graph researchability

Visible people graph includes 22 visible people: 22 named, 22 titled, 21 located, and 1 contactable.

Research-ready profile graph
Profile coverage evidence tier: Deep profile coverage evidence. Profile coverage evidence combines 45 mapped workforce signals, 52 employee size estimate, and 86.5% profile graph coverage.
Corroborated profile graph evidence: Researchability is based on 22 visible people with 4 populated evidence dimensions: named, titled, located, and contactable signals.
Profile association confidence: Profile association sample. Association confidence combines 22 titled profiles, 1 official-domain email profile, 1 titled profiles with official-domain email, 1 located profiles with official-domain email, and 1 contactable profile.
People
22
Named
22
Titled
22
Located
21
Contactable
1

Data methodology

AeroLeads renders only source-backed fields for this company page.

5 source groups
Company record Matched profile graph Email-pattern aggregate Related company graph Company signal fields
Blank source fields are omitted
Related companies are ordered deterministically
Structured data uses aggregate counts only

Intelligence completeness

8 of 11 major intelligence groups are available for this company.

8 / 11 groups
Strong intelligence record 72.7%
Workforce composition Contactability Email intelligence Decision makers Buying committee Technology talent Domain confidence Market and peer context

Evidence quality

This page clears the 60+ AeroLeads company-intelligence evidence threshold.

100 / 100
Priority intelligence record Threshold 60+
Workforce composition Department contactability Official-domain department contactability Department seniority map Official-domain department leaders Business function mix
Workforce graph
26 signals
Workforce composition, Department contactability, Official-domain department contactability
Source trust
12 signals
Functional team estimates, Functional coverage gap, Domain confidence
Contactability
9 signals
Official-domain function contactability, Email pattern intelligence, Official-domain contact freshness
Decision-maker intelligence
12 signals
Decision-maker coverage, Leadership signals, Department leadership coverage
Technology intelligence
1 signal
Technology talent
Market and peer context
13 signals
Related company graph, Peer graph strength, Peer position benchmark
Company momentum
1 signal
Company signal breadth
68 additional source-backed evidence signals are counted in this page quality score.

Prospecting readiness

Kateb University shows research-first prospecting fit based on best covered outreach path, decision-maker coverage, people graph depth, and peer context.

50 / 100
Research-first prospecting fit Corroborated prospecting evidence

Prospecting evidence combines best covered outreach path, decision-maker coverage, people graph depth, and peer context; raw contact values are hidden.

ICP fit
Qualified ICP fit

ICP fit combines company size, market specificity, buying committee, people graph depth, and domain trust; raw contact values are hidden.

68 / 100
Company size
52 employees
Employee estimate is in a common outbound prospecting range.
Market specificity
Tagged market profile
2 category and specialty signals in the company record.
Buying committee
Mapped buying committee
Mapped decision-maker signals span 3 business functions.
People graph depth
Deep profile graph
45 mapped workforce signals against a 52 employee size estimate.
Domain trust
High-confidence domain alignment
Domain evidence combines website domain, social profile, employee email alignment, profile-domain association, and company email sample; raw email addresses are hidden.
Account research checklist
Multi-step account research checklist

Account research checklist combines best covered outreach path, buying-committee coverage, ICP fit, related-company graph, domain trust, and people graph depth; raw contact values are hidden.

6 steps
Confirm contact path
Executive + Executive
Outreach path evidence combines 1 visible Executive contact signal, 1 contactable Executive decision-maker signal, and 1 official-domain decision-maker email signal; raw contacts are hidden.
Map reachable buying committee
Mapped buying committee
Buying-committee evidence combines 3 mapped buying-committee functions, 1 contactable function, 1 official-domain function on kateb.edu.af, and Executive / corporate, Technology / data, and Marketing / growth function coverage.
Validate ICP fit
Qualified ICP fit
ICP fit combines company size, market specificity, buying committee, people graph depth, and domain trust; raw contact values are hidden.
Compare related peers
Limited peer comparison
Compares this company with related-company evidence across employee scale and peer graph evidence.
Check domain trust
High-confidence domain alignment
Domain evidence combines website domain, social profile, employee email alignment, profile-domain association, and company email sample; raw email addresses are hidden.
Review people graph depth
Deep profile graph
45 mapped workforce signals against a 52 employee size estimate.
Best outreach path
Executive + Executive
Coverage combines 1 visible Executive contact signal, 1 contactable Executive decision-maker signal, and 1 official-domain decision-maker email signal.
Decision-maker coverage
Mapped buying committee
Mapped decision-maker signals span 3 business functions.
People graph depth
Deep profile graph
45 mapped workforce signals against a 52 employee size estimate.
Peer context
Multi-signal peer benchmark evidence
Peer benchmark combines 6 related companies with peer graph strength, size benchmark, and size position. Underlying peer graph includes 4 evidence types: industry context, employee benchmarks, website records, social profiles.
Person-level contact coverage missing: No visible people on this page include email or phone contact evidence.

Domain trust signals

Domain confidence for kateb.edu.af is based on website domain, social profile, employee email alignment, profile-domain association, and company email sample.

80 / 100
High-confidence domain alignment High-confidence domain evidence

Domain evidence combines website domain, social profile, employee email alignment, profile-domain association, and company email sample; raw email addresses are hidden.

Website domain
kateb.edu.af
The official website domain is available from the company source record.
Social profile
LinkedIn organization page
A LinkedIn organization page is present for this company record.
Employee email alignment
1 official-domain email signals
100% of visible employee email signals match kateb.edu.af; raw addresses are hidden.
Profile-domain association
1 people with official-domain email
Matched people include official-domain email evidence; raw addresses are hidden.
Company email sample
25 official-domain source email records
Company-level email source records include official-domain coverage; raw addresses are hidden.

AeroLeads coverage snapshot

Profile sample
4
Visible people attached to this company page.
Profile graph depth
Deep profile graph
45 mapped workforce signals against a 52 employee size estimate.
Contact evidence confidence
Current email evidence
1 current or verified email signal available; raw addresses are hidden.
Department coverage
5
Departments represented in AeroLeads workforce signals.
Department concentration
Department-concentrated workforce
Most mapped workforce signals are in General.
Leadership signals
7
Department lead or leadership signals in the org data.
Department leader sample
Department leader sample
AeroLeads source data includes 6 leadership signals across 4 departments; rows show titles and contact-channel presence only.
Official-domain department leaders
Official-domain leader evidence
1 department leader sample across 1 department includes company-domain email signals.
Department leadership coverage
Broad department leadership coverage
Leadership signals appear across 5 of 5 mapped departments.
Leadership density
15.60
Percent of mapped department signals that are leadership signals.
Department contact coverage
1
Departments with visible contact samples.
Department contact spread
Focused department contact spread
Visible contact samples appear in 1 of 5 mapped departments.
Official-domain department contactability
Single-department official-domain coverage
1 of 5 mapped departments include visible company-domain email signals.
Department seniority map
Multi-department seniority map
Visible department samples map 18 seniority-classified profiles across 5 departments and 3 seniority bands.
Technology department signals
3
Mapped department profile signals in technology-oriented teams.
Email-pattern variants
3
Distinct matched business email patterns.
Domain confidence
High-confidence domain alignment
Domain confidence for kateb.edu.af is based on website domain, social profile, employee email alignment, profile-domain association, and company email sample.
Contact freshness
Dated contact metadata
AeroLeads source data includes 25 dated contact records; 0 fall within 90 days and 0 fall within 12 months of the Jun 2026 source update. Raw emails and phone numbers are hidden.
Contact data safety
Corroborated privacy-safe contact intelligence
AeroLeads exposes contact counts, channel mix, freshness, and domain-alignment evidence while hiding raw email addresses and masking phone numbers in public output.
Official-domain contact freshness
Dated official-domain contact metadata
25 dated official-domain email records; 0 fall within 12 months of the Jun 2026 source update.
Company signal breadth
Single-signal company record
Company-level signals include social audience.
Audience density
Low audience density
115 followers against 52 employee estimate, about 2.20 followers per estimated employee.
Specialty signals
1
Specialty tags in the company record.
Market specificity
Tagged market profile
2 category and specialty signals in the company record.
Peer industry clusters
6
Industries represented by related company records.
Related companies
6
Company graph links available for comparison.
Industry benchmark
Evidence-backed industry benchmark
Industry benchmark uses 6 related companies, 1 same-industry peer, 3 benchmark dimensions, and 4 peer evidence types from the AeroLeads related-company graph.
Peer benchmark confidence
Multi-signal peer benchmark evidence
Peer benchmark combines 6 related companies with peer graph strength, size benchmark, and size position. Underlying peer graph includes 4 evidence types: industry context, employee benchmarks, website records, social profiles.
Peer position benchmark
Employee-scale peer position benchmark
Peer-position benchmark shows employee scale above 16.7% of 6 comparable related peers.
Peer comparison matrix
Limited peer comparison
Compares this company with related-company evidence across employee scale and peer graph evidence.
Workforce locations
4
Locations represented in visible profile signals.
Workforce distribution
Concentrated workforce
Most visible profile location signals are in Afghanistan.
Workforce location footprint
Multi-country workforce footprint
Visible profile locations span 4 cities across 3 countries, led by Afghanistan.
Workforce distribution model
Multi-country workforce model
Visible profile locations span 3 countries, led by Afghanistan at 71% of visible location signals.
Workforce geography evidence confidence
Multi-location workforce geography evidence
Workforce geography spans 4 locations across 21 visible profile signals. Top workforce hub differs from company location.
Workforce seniority tiers
4
Seniority bands derived from visible profile titles and levels.
Seniority evidence confidence
Corroborated seniority evidence
Seniority graph spans 22 classified profile signals across 4 tiers, with reachable evidence for 1 and company-domain evidence for 1. Contributor-heavy visible sample.
Classified seniority profiles
22
Visible profiles with usable seniority signals.
Official-domain seniority profiles
Official-domain seniority evidence
1 seniority-classified profile across 1 tier includes company-domain email signals.
Management-to-IC proxy
Contributor-heavy visible sample
7 managerial seniority signals and 15 contributor signals appear in the visible seniority-classified sample.
Role title diversity
Diverse role title sample
17 distinct role titles across 22 visible titled profiles.
Visible role titles
17
Distinct role titles found in visible profile signals.
Business function mix
Broad business-function workforce sample
AeroLeads maps 9 visible profile signals into 5 business functions; 1 include visible contact data.
Mapped business functions
5
Business functions inferred from visible profile titles and departments.
Functional team estimates
Revenue and engineering team estimates
AeroLeads derives 1 visible revenue team profile signal and 3 visible engineering team profile signals from mapped business-function signals.
Functional coverage gaps
Broad function coverage with visible gaps
Visible people signals cover 4 of 8 core business functions. Not observed in the visible graph: Sales / revenue, Product / design, Operations, and Customer / support. Treat this as a coverage gap, not confirmed absence.
Decision-maker signals
7
Visible profiles matching seniority or leadership title patterns.
Decision-maker reachability
Partial decision-maker reachability
Some mapped decision-maker signals include visible contact data.
Buying committee evidence confidence
Mapped buying committee
Mapped decision-maker signals span 3 business functions.
Buyer persona availability
Multi-persona buyer availability
Mapped decision-maker evidence covers Executive buyer, Technology buyer, and Marketing buyer; 1 of 3 buyer personas include visible contact data.
Decision-maker contactability rate
14.30
Percent of mapped decision-maker signals with visible contact data.
Official-domain decision-maker coverage
Strong official-domain decision-maker coverage
Most contactable decision-maker signals use kateb.edu.af email coverage.
Official-domain decision-maker contacts
1
Contactable decision-maker signals with official-domain email coverage.
Best covered outreach path
Executive + Executive
Coverage combines 1 visible Executive contact signal, 1 contactable Executive decision-maker signal, and 1 official-domain decision-maker email signal.
Prospecting fit
Research-first prospecting fit
Kateb University shows research-first prospecting fit based on best covered outreach path, decision-maker coverage, people graph depth, and peer context.
ICP fit
Qualified ICP fit
Kateb University matches the qualified ICP fit band for common outbound filters based on company size, market specificity, buying committee, people graph depth, and domain trust.
Account research checklist
Multi-step account research checklist
Account research checklist combines best covered outreach path, buying-committee coverage, ICP fit, related-company graph, domain trust, and people graph depth; raw contact values are hidden.
Intelligence signal groups
21
AeroLeads signal groups available for this company.

Market focus signals

Primary industry
Education Administration Programs
Market specificity
Tagged market profile
2 category and specialty signals in the company record.
Market evidence tier
Corroborated market evidence
Market evidence combines 7 classification signals from categories, specialties, and related peer industries.
Industry benchmark
Evidence-backed industry benchmark
Industry benchmark uses 6 related companies, 1 same-industry peer, 3 benchmark dimensions, and 4 peer evidence types from the AeroLeads related-company graph.
Top peer industry
Staffing and Recruiting
16% of 6 related peer industry signals.
Peer benchmark evidence
Multi-signal peer benchmark evidence
Peer benchmark combines 6 related companies with peer graph strength, size benchmark, and size position. Underlying peer graph includes 4 evidence types: industry context, employee benchmarks, website records, social profiles.
Size position
Smaller than most related peers
5 of 6 related employee-estimated peers are higher.
Peer graph strength
Benchmark-ready peer graph
Related peer graph has industry context, employee benchmarks, website records, and social profiles across 6 related companies.
Benchmark dimensions: peer graph strength, size benchmark, and size position.
Categories
Education Administration Programs
Specialties
New York
Product-market keyword evidence
Limited market keywords
Keyword evidence comes from 2 source field groups: Category, Specialty.
Product-market keyword evidence tier: Limited product-market keyword evidence. Product-market keyword evidence combines 2 unique market keywords and 2 source field groups (1 category and 1 specialty).
Education Administration Programs · Category New York · Specialty
Related peer industries
Peer-industry evidence tier: High-confidence peer-industry evidence. Peer-industry evidence combines 6 related companies, 5 peer-industry clusters, and top peer industry Staffing and Recruiting at 16.7%.
Functional coverage gaps
Broad function coverage with visible gaps
Visible people signals cover 4 of 8 core business functions. Not observed in the visible graph: Sales / revenue, Product / design, Operations, and Customer / support. Treat this as a coverage gap, not confirmed absence.
Transparent function coverage evidence: Function coverage evidence combines observed functions Marketing / growth, Technology / data, People / HR, and Finance and 4 unobserved core functions in the visible graph.
Staffing and Recruiting 1 peer
16.7% of related peer industries
Musicians 1 peer
16.7% of related peer industries
Urban Transit Services 1 peer
16.7% of related peer industries
Education Administration Programs 1 peer
16.7% of related peer industries
Restaurants 1 peer
16.7% of related peer industries

Company signals

Company signal breadth
Single-signal company record
Company-level signals include social audience.
Limited company record evidence: Company record evidence combines 1 source-backed company signal type: social audience.
Social audience
115
Followers in the company source record.
Social audience evidence tier: Limited social-audience evidence. Social audience evidence uses 115 followers from source field social_followers.
Audience density
Low audience density
115 followers against 52 employee estimate, about 2.20 followers per estimated employee.
Audience-density evidence tier: Limited audience-density evidence. Audience-density evidence combines 115 social followers, 52 employee estimate, and 2.20 followers per estimated employee.

Workforce composition

Department concentration
Department-concentrated workforce
Most mapped workforce signals are in General. 80.0% of mapped department signals are in the largest department.
Department concentration evidence tier: Concentrated department evidence. Department concentration evidence combines 5 mapped departments, top department General, and 80.0% top-department share.
Department leadership coverage
Broad department leadership coverage
Leadership signals appear across 5 of 5 mapped departments. Leadership signals represent 15.6% of mapped department signals.
Department leadership evidence tier: High-confidence department leadership evidence. Department leadership evidence combines 7 leadership signals, 5 of 5 mapped departments, and 15.6% leadership density.
Department seniority map
Multi-department seniority map
Visible department samples map 18 seniority-classified profiles across 5 departments and 3 seniority bands.
Department seniority evidence tier: High-confidence department seniority evidence. Department seniority evidence combines 18 seniority-classified profiles, 5 departments, 3 seniority bands, and top cell General + Individual contributor with 9 profiles.
General 10 profiles
Manager: 1 Individual contributor: 9
Finance 3 profiles
Individual contributor: 3
IT 3 profiles
Manager: 3
Executive 1 profile
Executive: 1
Marketing 1 profile
Manager: 1
7 leadership signals 1 departments with visible contacts
Department leader sample
Department leader sample
1 contactable 1 official-domain

AeroLeads source data includes 6 leadership signals across 4 departments; rows show titles and contact-channel presence only.

Department leader evidence tier: Corroborated department leader evidence. Department leader evidence combines 6 leadership signals, 4 departments, 1 contactable, and 1 official-domain; raw contacts are hidden.

Official-domain leader evidence: 1 department leader sample across 1 department includes company-domain email signals.

Leader Department Seniority Channel
Hashem Safdari
Vice President at Kateb University
 Executive Executive Email
Fatima Alimi
Plc Manager at Kateb University
 General Manager No visible contact channel
Hassan Yousufi
IT Manager at Kateb University
 IT Manager No visible contact channel
Kateb IT
IT Manager at Kateb University
 IT Manager No visible contact channel
Sayed Mohsen Jafari
IT Manager at Kateb University
 IT Manager No visible contact channel
Meisam Qasemi
Communications Manager at Kateb University
 Marketing Manager No visible contact channel
General 36 signals
80.0% of mapped department signals, 1 leadership signals
Finance 4 signals
8.9% of mapped department signals, 1 leadership signals
IT 3 signals
6.7% of mapped department signals, 3 leadership signals
Executive 1 signals
2.2% of mapped department signals, 1 leadership signals, 1 visible contact
Marketing 1 signals
2.2% of mapped department signals, 1 leadership signals

Technology talent signals

Technology-oriented department signals found in the workforce graph.

3 IT department signals

Workforce seniority mix

Aggregated from 22 classified profile signals.

Largest seniority band
Individual contributor
15 of 22 classified profile signals.
Official-domain seniority evidence: 1 seniority-classified profile across 1 tier includes company-domain email signals.
Corroborated seniority evidence: Seniority graph spans 22 classified profile signals across 4 tiers, with reachable evidence for 1 and company-domain evidence for 1. Contributor-heavy visible sample.
Management-to-IC proxy
Contributor-heavy visible sample
31.8%
managerial seniority signals
68.2%
contributor seniority signals
7 managerial seniority signals and 15 contributor signals appear in the visible seniority-classified sample.
Management-shape evidence tier: Contributor-heavy management-shape evidence. Management-shape evidence combines 22 seniority-classified signals, 7 managerial signals, 31.8% managerial share, and 15 contributor signals.
Individual contributor 15 profiles
68.2% of classified seniority signals
Manager 5 profiles
22.7% of classified seniority signals
Executive 1 profile
4.5% of classified seniority signals, 1 with visible contact data, 1 official-domain
Director 1 profile
4.5% of classified seniority signals

Workforce geography

Aggregated from 21 visible profile location signals.

Workforce geography evidence
Multi-location workforce geography evidence
Workforce geography spans 4 locations across 21 visible profile signals. Top workforce hub differs from company location.
Distribution signal
Concentrated workforce
Most visible profile location signals are in Afghanistan.
Workforce distribution model
Multi-country workforce model
Visible profile locations span 3 countries, led by Afghanistan at 71% of visible location signals.
Corroborated workforce model evidence: Workforce model evidence combines 21 located profile signals, 4 workforce locations, 4 cities, 3 countries, top hub Afghanistan at 71%, and company-location alignment.
Locations
4
Countries
3
Top hub share
71%
Workforce location footprint
Multi-country workforce footprint
Visible profile locations span 4 cities across 3 countries, led by Afghanistan.
Cities
4
Countries
3
Company-location alignment
Top workforce hub differs from company location
The largest visible workforce location is Afghanistan, while the company location is Af.
Top workforce hub share: 71.4%
Company-location evidence tier: Workforce-location divergence evidence. Company-location alignment evidence combines company location Af, top workforce hub Afghanistan, 71.4% top workforce hub share, and location difference.
Afghanistan 15 profiles
71.4% of visible location signals
Kabul, Kabul Province, Afghanistan 4 profiles
19.0% of visible location signals
Ottawa, Ontario, Canada 1 profile
4.8% of visible location signals
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 profile
4.8% of visible location signals

Decision-maker coverage

7 seniority signals, 1 with visible contact data.

Decision-maker evidence tier
Mapped decision-maker evidence
Decision-maker evidence covers 7 seniority signals, 1 reachable, and 1 company-domain. Buying committee spans 3 functions.
Account planning snapshot
Multi-signal account planning snapshot
Snapshot combines department reachability, decision-maker coverage, and buying-committee function aggregates.
4 account-planning evidence cards available.
Account planning evidence tier: Multi-source account planning evidence. Account planning evidence combines 4 aggregate account-planning cards, best covered outreach path, 1 reachable buying-committee function, 1 official-domain decision-maker signal, Executive seniority reachability, and Executive department contactability; raw contacts are hidden.
Best covered path
Executive + Executive
Coverage combines 1 visible Executive contact signal, 1 contactable Executive decision-maker signal, and 1 official-domain decision-maker email signal.
Reachable buying committee
1 of 3 functions
Reachable functions include Executive / corporate.
Most reachable seniority
Executive
1 of 1 signals in this seniority band include visible contact data.
Top reachable team
Executive
1 visible contact signal in this department sample.
Partial decision-maker reachability 14.3%
Some mapped decision-maker signals include visible contact data.
Decision-maker reachability evidence tier: Partial decision-maker reachability evidence. Decision-maker reachability evidence combines 1 contactable decision-maker signal, 7 mapped decision-maker signals, 14.3% contactability, and 1 official-domain decision-maker signal.
Email-led decision-maker coverage: Mapped decision-maker contact data is strongest for email, with 1 email signals.
Buying committee function coverage
Broad buying-committee coverage
1 of 3 mapped functions include visible decision-maker contact data.
Single-function official-domain buying committee: 1 of 3 mapped business functions include decision-maker email coverage on kateb.edu.af.
Mapped buying committee: Mapped decision-maker signals span 3 business functions.
Buying committee evidence tier: Mapped buying-committee evidence. Buying-committee evidence combines 3 mapped buying-committee functions, 1 contactable function, 1 official-domain function on kateb.edu.af, and Executive / corporate, Technology / data, and Marketing / growth function coverage.
Buyer persona availability: Multi-persona buyer availability. Mapped decision-maker evidence covers Executive buyer, Technology buyer, and Marketing buyer; 1 of 3 buyer personas include visible contact data. Reachable buyer persona evidence: Buyer persona evidence combines 3 mapped buyer personas, 1 contactable persona, 1 official-domain persona on kateb.edu.af, and Executive buyer, Technology buyer, and Marketing buyer coverage.
Executive / corporate: 1 contactable Technology / data Marketing / growth
Most reachable seniority
Executive
1 of 1 seniority signals include visible contact data.
Seniority reachability evidence tier: High-confidence seniority reachability evidence. Seniority reachability evidence combines 1 contactable Executive signal, 1 Executive signal, 100.0% tier contactability, 1 official-domain Executive signal, and email coverage.
Official-domain decision-maker coverage
Strong official-domain decision-maker coverage
1 contactable decision-maker signals match kateb.edu.af. Most contactable decision-maker signals use kateb.edu.af email coverage.
Official-domain decision-maker evidence tier: Strong official-domain decision-maker evidence. Official-domain decision-maker evidence combines 1 official-domain decision-maker signal, 1 contactable decision-maker signal, 100.0% official-domain coverage, and kateb.edu.af domain match.
Manager 5 profiles
71.4% of mapped seniority signals
Director 1 profile
14.3% of mapped seniority signals
Executive 1 profile
14.3% of mapped seniority signals, 1 with visible contact data

Role and function mix

22 visible titled profiles across 17 distinct role titles.

Title mix
Diverse role title sample
17 distinct role titles across 22 visible titled profiles.
Role-title evidence tier: Diverse role-title evidence. Role-title diversity evidence combines 22 visible titled profiles, 17 distinct role titles, and top title IT Manager at Kateb University at 13.6%.
Business function mix
Broad business-function workforce sample
AeroLeads maps 9 visible profile signals into 5 business functions; 1 include visible contact data.
Business-function evidence tier: Corroborated business-function evidence. Business-function evidence combines 9 mapped function profile signals, 5 business functions, 1 contactable signal, 1 contactable function, 1 official-domain signal, 1 official-domain function, and top function Finance at 33.3%.
Single-function contactability map 1 / 5 functions
1 of 5 mapped business functions include visible contact data.
Single-function official-domain coverage 1 / 5 functions
1 of 5 mapped business functions include visible email signals matching kateb.edu.af.
Functional team estimates
Revenue and engineering team estimates
AeroLeads derives 1 visible revenue team profile signal and 3 visible engineering team profile signals from mapped business-function signals.
Mapped functional team evidence: Functional team estimate evidence combines 1 visible revenue team profile signal and 3 visible engineering team profile signals.
Revenue team estimate 1 profile
11.1% of mapped function signals; Marketing / growth
Engineering team estimate 3 profiles
33.3% of mapped function signals; Technology / data
Finance 3 profiles
33.3% of mapped function signals
Technology / data 3 profiles
33.3% of mapped function signals
Executive / corporate 1 profile
11.1% of mapped function signals, 1 with visible contact data
Marketing / growth 1 profile
11.1% of mapped function signals
People / HR 1 profile
11.1% of mapped function signals
IT Manager at Kateb University 3 profiles
13.6% of visible titled profiles
Lecturer at Kateb University 2 profiles
9.1% of visible titled profiles
Student at Kateb University 2 profiles
9.1% of visible titled profiles
Teacher at Kateb University 2 profiles
9.1% of visible titled profiles
Administrative Officer at Kateb University 1 profile
4.5% of visible titled profiles
Co-organizer at Tedxdarulaman - Selection Council Member,leader, Champion at United 1 profile
4.5% of visible titled profiles

Contactability signals

Contact evidence tier
Current email evidence
1 current or verified email signal available; raw addresses are hidden.
Contact data safety
Corroborated privacy-safe contact intelligence
AeroLeads exposes contact counts, channel mix, freshness, and domain-alignment evidence while hiding raw email addresses and masking phone numbers in public output.
Aggregate signals
25
Channel coverage
Email aggregate coverage
Evidence groups
3
Corroborated contact-safety evidence: Contact-safety evidence combines company email sample, dated contact metadata, and official-domain email evidence; public schema uses aggregate variables only.
Aggregate-only contact schema: Dataset variables use counts, rates, channel labels, freshness bands, and domain-alignment metrics instead of raw contact values.
Best covered outreach path
Executive + Executive
Coverage combines 1 visible Executive contact signal, 1 contactable Executive decision-maker signal, and 1 official-domain decision-maker email signal.
Outreach path evidence tier: Corroborated outreach path evidence. Outreach path evidence combines 1 visible Executive contact signal, 1 contactable Executive decision-maker signal, and 1 official-domain decision-maker email signal; raw contacts are hidden.
Contact freshness
Dated contact metadata
AeroLeads source data includes 25 dated contact records; 0 fall within 90 days and 0 fall within 12 months of the Jun 2026 source update. Raw emails and phone numbers are hidden.
Contact freshness evidence tier: Dated contact freshness evidence. Contact freshness evidence combines 25 dated contact records, email timestamps, and 25 official-domain dated email records.
25 dated records 0 within 90 days 0.0% fresh rate 0 within 12 months Latest Oct 2021
Dated email metadata: Dated contact records include 25 email records.
Dated official-domain contact metadata: 25 dated official-domain email records; 0 fall within 12 months of the Jun 2026 source update.
Visible people
4
Company email sample
Company email sample
AeroLeads source data includes 25 email records across 1 domain; raw addresses are hidden. 25 match kateb.edu.af.
Source email evidence tier: High-confidence source email evidence. Source email evidence combines 25 unique source email records, 1 domain, 25 matching kateb.edu.af, and 100.0% official-domain rate.

Department contact samples

Focused department contact spread: Visible contact samples appear in 1 of 5 mapped departments.
Department contactability evidence tier: Limited department contactability evidence. Department contactability evidence combines 1 visible contact sample, 1 of 5 mapped departments, 1 email signal, and 1 official-domain email signal; raw contacts are hidden.
Official-domain department coverage
Single-department official-domain coverage
1 of 5 mapped departments include visible company-domain email signals.
Department Contacts Email Official email Phone
Executive 1 1 1 0
Top email pattern: first at 33.3% of matched patterns.
Format example: [first]@kateb.edu.af
Mixed patterns: No single email pattern dominates the matched examples.
Email pattern evidence tier: Mixed email pattern evidence. Email pattern evidence combines 3 matched patterns, 33.3% top-pattern share, format example for kateb.edu.af, and secondary pattern variants.
first 33.3%
first_last 33.3%
first.last 33.3%

Explore related pages

Kateb University email format Kateb University management graph and contactability signals

Related company intelligence:

Kateb University source record includes a 52 employee estimate. Review people graph
The strongest Kateb University email pattern signal is [first] , representing 33.33% of matched email-pattern evidence in the AeroLeads company graph.
Other observed email-pattern signals for Kateb University are [first]_[last] , [first].[last] .
In total, AeroLeads has detected 3 aggregate email-pattern signals for Kateb University. View the detailed email format page .

Kateb University Email Pattern Intelligence Snapshot

These aggregate patterns support the company intelligence page. The dedicated email-format workflow lives on Kateb University email format .

Observed pattern
Example pattern
[first]
[first]@kateb.edu.af
33%
[first]_[last]
[first]_[last]@kateb.edu.af
33%
[first].[last]
[first].[last]@kateb.edu.af
33%

Kateb University Questions

Kateb University people graph sample