Lift Safe Ltd - Material Handling Specialists

Lift Safe Ltd - Material Handling Specialists Company Intelligence, Employees & Contact Signals

Contact coverage
Email-led
Visible profile or company source data is strongest for email outreach. 3 visible profiles include direct contact evidence.
People graph depth
5 signals
Deep profile graph across 3 mapped departments.
Account research
6 steps
Account research checklist combines best covered outreach path, buying-committee coverage, ICP fit, technology workforce evidence, related-company graph, and domain trust; raw contact values are hidden.
Technology talent
3
Technology-oriented role signals in the workforce graph.
Evidence quality 100/100 Priority intelligence record

AeroLeads company intelligence

Lift Safe Ltd - Material Handling Specialists workforce and contactability signals

Evidence from AeroLeads company records, matched professional profiles, and related company graph.

High confidence
Intelligence completeness
Strong intelligence record
8 of 11 major intelligence groups are available for this company.
Largest mapped team
IT
3 profile signals in IT.
Departments mapped
3
Workforce composition from AeroLeads profile data.
Profile graph
Deep profile graph
5 mapped workforce signals against a 14 employee size estimate.
Top reachable team
IT
1 visible contact signal.
Top seniority band
Individual contributor
4 of 7 classified profile signals.
Visible contact sample
3
Displayed people with email or phone data.

Profile graph researchability

Visible people graph includes 7 visible people: 7 named, 7 titled, 7 located, and 3 contactable.

Multi-signal profile graph
Profile coverage evidence tier: Deep profile coverage evidence. Profile coverage evidence combines 5 mapped workforce signals, 14 employee size estimate, and 35.7% profile graph coverage.
High-confidence profile graph evidence: Researchability is based on 7 visible people with 4 populated evidence dimensions: named, titled, located, and contactable signals.
Profile association confidence: Profile association sample. Association confidence combines 7 titled profiles, 1 official-domain email profile, 1 titled profiles with official-domain email, 1 located profiles with official-domain email, and 3 contactable profiles.
People
7
Named
7
Titled
7
Located
7
Contactable
3

Data methodology

AeroLeads renders only source-backed fields for this company page.

5 source groups
Company record Matched profile graph Email-pattern aggregate Related company graph Company signal fields
Blank source fields are omitted
Related companies are ordered deterministically
Structured data uses aggregate counts only

Intelligence completeness

8 of 11 major intelligence groups are available for this company.

8 / 11 groups
Strong intelligence record 72.7%
Workforce composition Contactability Email intelligence Decision makers Buying committee Technology talent Domain confidence Market and peer context

Evidence quality

This page clears the 60+ AeroLeads company-intelligence evidence threshold.

100 / 100
Priority intelligence record Threshold 60+
Workforce composition Employee email coverage Department contactability Department seniority map Business function mix Functional team estimates
Workforce graph
27 signals
Workforce composition, Department contactability, Department seniority map
Contactability
14 signals
Employee email coverage, Email pattern intelligence, Email usability mix
Source trust
14 signals
Functional team estimates, Functional coverage gap, Domain confidence
Decision-maker intelligence
10 signals
Decision-maker coverage, Leadership signals, Department leadership coverage
Technology intelligence
2 signals
Technology talent, Technology reachability
Market and peer context
13 signals
Related company graph, Peer graph strength, Peer position benchmark
Company momentum
5 signals
Company signal breadth, Company momentum score, Company ownership signal
79 additional source-backed evidence signals are counted in this page quality score.

Prospecting readiness

Lift Safe Ltd - Material Handling Specialists shows strong prospecting fit based on person-level contact coverage, best covered outreach path, decision-maker coverage, and technology workforce evidence.

90 / 100
Strong prospecting fit High-confidence prospecting evidence

Prospecting evidence combines person-level contact coverage, best covered outreach path, decision-maker coverage, technology workforce evidence, and people graph depth; raw contact values are hidden.

ICP fit
Strong ICP fit

ICP fit combines company size, market specificity, contactability, buying committee, and technology path; raw contact values are hidden.

85 / 100
Company size
14 employees
Employee estimate is in a common outbound prospecting range.
Market specificity
Focused market profile
14 market classification signals across categories, specialties, and related peer industries.
Reachability
High-confidence contact evidence
2 current or verified professional email signals, 6 company-domain email signals, and email-led contact coverage; raw addresses and numbers are hidden.
Buying committee
Mapped buying committee
Mapped decision-maker signals span 2 business functions.
Technology path
Partial technology reachability
Some matched technology role signals include visible contact data.
Account research checklist
Multi-step account research checklist

Account research checklist combines best covered outreach path, buying-committee coverage, ICP fit, technology workforce evidence, related-company graph, and domain trust; raw contact values are hidden.

6 steps
Confirm contact path
IT + Manager
Outreach path evidence combines 1 visible IT contact signal, 1 contactable Manager decision-maker signal, and 1 official-domain decision-maker email signal; raw contacts are hidden.
Map reachable buying committee
Mapped buying committee
Buying-committee evidence combines 2 mapped buying-committee functions and People / HR and Sales / revenue function coverage.
Validate ICP fit
Strong ICP fit
ICP fit combines company size, market specificity, contactability, buying committee, and technology path; raw contact values are hidden.
Review technology path
Partial technology reachability
Some matched technology role signals include visible contact data.
Compare related peers
Limited peer comparison
Compares this company with related-company evidence across employee scale and peer graph evidence.
Check domain trust
High-confidence domain alignment
Domain evidence combines website domain, social profile, employee email alignment, profile-domain association, and company email sample; raw email addresses are hidden.
Contact coverage
High-confidence contact evidence
2 current or verified professional email signals, 6 company-domain email signals, and email-led contact coverage; raw addresses and numbers are hidden.
Best outreach path
IT + Manager
Coverage combines 1 visible IT contact signal, 1 contactable Manager decision-maker signal, and 1 official-domain decision-maker email signal.
Decision-maker coverage
Mapped buying committee
Mapped decision-maker signals span 2 business functions.
Technology contact path
Partial technology reachability
Some matched technology role signals include visible contact data.

Domain trust signals

Domain confidence for liftsafe.net is based on website domain, social profile, employee email alignment, profile-domain association, and company email sample.

80 / 100
High-confidence domain alignment High-confidence domain evidence

Domain evidence combines website domain, social profile, employee email alignment, profile-domain association, and company email sample; raw email addresses are hidden.

Website domain
liftsafe.net
The official website domain is available from the company source record.
Social profile
LinkedIn organization page
A LinkedIn organization page is present for this company record.
Employee email alignment
1 official-domain email signals
33% of visible employee email signals match liftsafe.net; raw addresses are hidden.
Profile-domain association
1 people with official-domain email
Matched people include official-domain email evidence; raw addresses are hidden.
Company email sample
6 official-domain source email records
Company-level email source records include official-domain coverage; raw addresses are hidden.

AeroLeads coverage snapshot

Profile sample
4
Visible people attached to this company page.
Profile graph depth
Deep profile graph
5 mapped workforce signals against a 14 employee size estimate.
Contactable sample
3
Visible people with email or phone data.
Contact channel mix
Email-led contact coverage
Visible profile or company source data is strongest for email outreach.
Contact evidence confidence
High-confidence contact evidence
2 current or verified professional email signals, 6 company-domain email signals, and email-led contact coverage; raw addresses and numbers are hidden.
Department coverage
3
Departments represented in AeroLeads workforce signals.
Department concentration
Multi-department workforce
Mapped workforce signals span 3 departments, led by IT.
Leadership signals
2
Department lead or leadership signals in the org data.
Department leader sample
Limited department leader sample
AeroLeads source data includes 1 leadership signal across 1 department; rows show titles and contact-channel presence only.
Department leadership coverage
Broad department leadership coverage
Leadership signals appear across 2 of 3 mapped departments.
Leadership density
40
Percent of mapped department signals that are leadership signals.
Department contact coverage
1
Departments with visible contact samples.
Department contact spread
Focused department contact spread
Visible contact samples appear in 1 of 3 mapped departments.
Department seniority map
Multi-department seniority map
Visible department samples map 4 seniority-classified profiles across 3 departments and 2 seniority bands.
Technology talent
3
Visible profiles matching technology role patterns.
Technology evidence confidence
Reachable technology evidence
2 matched technology role signals include visible contact data.
Technology reachability
Partial technology reachability
Some matched technology role signals include visible contact data.
Technology contactability rate
66.70
Percent of matched technology role signals with visible contact data.
Technology department signals
3
Mapped department profile signals in technology-oriented teams.
Email-pattern variants
1
Distinct matched business email patterns.
Official-domain emails
1
Email signals matching liftsafe.net.
Email domain confidence
Mixed-domain coverage
Visible email signals include official-domain and non-official domains.
Domain confidence
High-confidence domain alignment
Domain confidence for liftsafe.net is based on website domain, social profile, employee email alignment, profile-domain association, and company email sample.
Email usability mix
Current email coverage sample
AeroLeads source data includes 3 unique visible email signals; 2 are marked current or verified and 2 are professional-type. Raw addresses are hidden.
Contact freshness
Dated contact metadata
AeroLeads source data includes 6 dated contact records; 0 fall within 90 days and 0 fall within 12 months of the Jun 2026 source update. Raw emails and phone numbers are hidden.
Contact data safety
Corroborated privacy-safe contact intelligence
AeroLeads exposes contact counts, channel mix, freshness, and domain-alignment evidence while hiding raw email addresses and masking phone numbers in public output.
Official-domain contact freshness
Dated official-domain contact metadata
6 dated official-domain email records; 0 fall within 12 months of the Jun 2026 source update.
Company signal breadth
Multi-signal company record
Company-level signals include social audience, company maturity, ownership, and funding.
Company momentum score
Limited company momentum score
Momentum score blends contactability and peer position from AeroLeads company and profile evidence.
Company ownership signal
Private company record
Company source record includes source type Privately Held.
Audience density
Moderate audience density
1.16K followers against 14 employee estimate, about 83.10 followers per estimated employee.
Specialty signals
8
Specialty tags in the company record.
Market specificity
Focused market profile
14 market classification signals across categories, specialties, and related peer industries.
Peer industry clusters
9
Industries represented by related company records.
Related companies
10
Company graph links available for comparison.
Industry benchmark
Peer-informed industry benchmark
Industry benchmark uses 10 related companies, 3 benchmark dimensions, and 3 peer evidence types from the AeroLeads related-company graph.
Peer benchmark confidence
Multi-signal peer benchmark evidence
Peer benchmark combines 10 related companies with peer graph strength, size benchmark, and size position. Underlying peer graph includes 3 evidence types: employee benchmarks, website records, social profiles.
Peer position benchmark
Employee-scale peer position benchmark
Peer-position benchmark shows employee scale above 88.9% of 9 comparable related peers.
Peer comparison matrix
Limited peer comparison
Compares this company with related-company evidence across employee scale and peer graph evidence.
Workforce locations
6
Locations represented in visible profile signals.
Workforce distribution
Distributed workforce
Visible profile location signals are spread across 6 locations.
Workforce location footprint
Multi-city workforce footprint
Visible profile locations span 6 cities across 1 country, led by Manchester Area.
Workforce distribution model
Broad distributed workforce model
Visible profile locations are spread across 6 workforce locations, with Manchester Area, United Kingdom as the largest hub at 28%.
Workforce geography evidence confidence
Corroborated workforce geography evidence
Workforce geography spans 6 locations across 7 visible profile signals, with reachable evidence across 3 locations. Top workforce hub shares company country.
Contactable workforce locations
3
Workforce locations represented by visible contact samples.
Top contactable workforce location
Manchester Area, United Kingdom
Visible contact samples span 3 workforce locations, led by Manchester Area, United Kingdom.
Workforce seniority tiers
3
Seniority bands derived from visible profile titles and levels.
Seniority evidence confidence
Corroborated seniority evidence
Seniority graph spans 7 classified profile signals across 3 tiers, with reachable evidence for 3 and company-domain evidence for 1. Balanced management-to-IC sample.
Classified seniority profiles
7
Visible profiles with usable seniority signals.
Official-domain seniority profiles
Official-domain seniority evidence
1 seniority-classified profile across 1 tier includes company-domain email signals.
Management-to-IC proxy
Balanced management-to-IC sample
3 managerial seniority signals and 4 contributor signals appear in the visible seniority-classified sample.
Role title diversity
Diverse role title sample
7 distinct role titles across 7 visible titled profiles.
Visible role titles
7
Distinct role titles found in visible profile signals.
Business function mix
Multi-function workforce sample
AeroLeads maps 5 visible profile signals into 3 business functions; 2 include visible contact data.
Mapped business functions
3
Business functions inferred from visible profile titles and departments.
Functional team estimates
Revenue and engineering team estimates
AeroLeads derives 1 visible revenue team profile signal and 3 visible engineering team profile signals from mapped business-function signals.
Functional coverage gaps
Partial function coverage map
Visible people signals cover 3 of 8 core business functions. Not observed in the visible graph: Marketing / growth, Product / design, Finance, and Operations. Treat this as a coverage gap, not confirmed absence.
Contactable role titles
3
Distinct role titles with visible contact samples.
Contactable role coverage
Diverse contactable role coverage
3 reachable role titles across 3 contactable titled profiles.
Decision-maker signals
3
Visible profiles matching seniority or leadership title patterns.
Decision-maker reachability
Partial decision-maker reachability
Some mapped decision-maker signals include visible contact data.
Buying committee evidence confidence
Mapped buying committee
Mapped decision-maker signals span 2 business functions.
Buyer persona availability
Dual-persona buyer availability
Mapped decision-maker evidence covers People buyer and Revenue buyer; 0 of 2 buyer personas include visible contact data.
Decision-maker contactability rate
33.30
Percent of mapped decision-maker signals with visible contact data.
Official-domain decision-maker coverage
Strong official-domain decision-maker coverage
Most contactable decision-maker signals use liftsafe.net email coverage.
Official-domain decision-maker contacts
1
Contactable decision-maker signals with official-domain email coverage.
Best covered outreach path
IT + Manager
Coverage combines 1 visible IT contact signal, 1 contactable Manager decision-maker signal, and 1 official-domain decision-maker email signal.
Prospecting fit
Strong prospecting fit
Lift Safe Ltd - Material Handling Specialists shows strong prospecting fit based on person-level contact coverage, best covered outreach path, decision-maker coverage, and technology workforce evidence.
ICP fit
Strong ICP fit
Lift Safe Ltd - Material Handling Specialists matches the strong ICP fit band for common outbound filters based on company size, market specificity, contactability, buying committee, and technology path.
Account research checklist
Multi-step account research checklist
Account research checklist combines best covered outreach path, buying-committee coverage, ICP fit, technology workforce evidence, related-company graph, and domain trust; raw contact values are hidden.
Intelligence signal groups
27
AeroLeads signal groups available for this company.

Market focus signals

Primary industry
Food and Beverage Manufacturing
Market specificity
Focused market profile
14 market classification signals across categories, specialties, and related peer industries.
Market evidence tier
High-confidence market evidence
Market evidence combines 14 classification signals from categories, specialties, related peer industries, and description keywords. 6 description-backed keyword signals are included.
Industry benchmark
Peer-informed industry benchmark
Industry benchmark uses 10 related companies, 3 benchmark dimensions, and 3 peer evidence types from the AeroLeads related-company graph.
Top peer industry
Industrial Machinery Manufacturing
20% of 10 related peer industry signals.
Peer benchmark evidence
Multi-signal peer benchmark evidence
Peer benchmark combines 10 related companies with peer graph strength, size benchmark, and size position. Underlying peer graph includes 3 evidence types: employee benchmarks, website records, social profiles.
Size position
Larger than most related peers
8 of 9 related employee-estimated peers are lower.
Peer graph strength
Partial peer evidence graph
Related peer graph has employee benchmarks, website records, and social profiles across 10 related companies.
Benchmark dimensions: peer graph strength, size benchmark, and size position.
Categories
Food and Beverage Manufacturing
Specialties
Lifting Equipment Health and safety equipment atex stackers roll handling reel handling drum handling materials handling scissor tables
Product-market keyword evidence
Description-backed market keywords
Keyword evidence comes from 3 source field groups: Category, Specialty, Description.
Product-market keyword evidence tier: High-confidence product-market keyword evidence. Product-market keyword evidence combines 15 unique market keywords, 3 source field groups, and 6 description-backed keywords (1 category, 8 specialty, and 6 description).
Food and Beverage Manufacturing · Category Lifting Equipment · Specialty Health and safety equipment · Specialty atex stackers · Specialty roll handling · Specialty reel handling · Specialty drum handling · Specialty materials handling · Specialty scissor tables · Specialty most comprehensive reliable · Description highest quality range · Description range includes · Description
Related peer industries
Peer-industry evidence tier: High-confidence peer-industry evidence. Peer-industry evidence combines 10 related companies, 5 peer-industry clusters, and top peer industry Industrial Machinery Manufacturing at 20.0%.
Functional coverage gaps
Partial function coverage map
Visible people signals cover 3 of 8 core business functions. Not observed in the visible graph: Marketing / growth, Product / design, Finance, and Operations. Treat this as a coverage gap, not confirmed absence.
Transparent function coverage evidence: Function coverage evidence combines observed functions Sales / revenue, Technology / data, and People / HR and 5 unobserved core functions in the visible graph.
Industrial Machinery Manufacturing 2 peers
20.0% of related peer industries
Motor Vehicle Manufacturing 1 peer
10.0% of related peer industries
Commercial and Industrial Equipment Rental 1 peer
10.0% of related peer industries
Machinery Manufacturing 1 peer
10.0% of related peer industries
Wellness and Fitness Services 1 peer
10.0% of related peer industries

Company signals

Company signal breadth
Multi-signal company record
Company-level signals include social audience, company maturity, ownership, and funding.
Multi-signal company record evidence: Company record evidence combines 4 source-backed company signal types: social audience, company maturity, ownership, and funding.
Social audience
1.16K
Followers in the company source record.
Social audience evidence tier: Limited social-audience evidence. Social audience evidence uses 1.16K followers from source field social_followers.
Audience density
Moderate audience density
1.16K followers against 14 employee estimate, about 83.10 followers per estimated employee.
Audience-density evidence tier: Corroborated audience-density evidence. Audience-density evidence combines 1.16K social followers, 14 employee estimate, and 83.10 followers per estimated employee.
Company maturity
Mature company record
Company source record includes founding year 2000, about 26 years before 2026.
Company maturity evidence tier: Long-running maturity evidence. Maturity evidence combines founding year 2000, 26 years of company history, and source field founded.
Company ownership
Private company record
Company source record includes source type Privately Held.
Company ownership evidence tier: Structured ownership evidence. Ownership evidence combines source type Privately Held from structured company source fields.
Funding
Funding data
Funding evidence tier: Limited funding evidence. Funding evidence combines 2 named investors from structured company source fields.
Named investor signal: Funding data names 2 investors in the company source record.
expert insight industry knowledge

Workforce composition

Department concentration
Multi-department workforce
Mapped workforce signals span 3 departments, led by IT. 60.0% of mapped department signals are in the largest department.
Department concentration evidence tier: Multi-department concentration evidence. Department concentration evidence combines 3 mapped departments, top department IT, and 60.0% top-department share.
Department leadership coverage
Broad department leadership coverage
Leadership signals appear across 2 of 3 mapped departments. Leadership signals represent 40.0% of mapped department signals.
Department leadership evidence tier: Corroborated department leadership evidence. Department leadership evidence combines 2 leadership signals, 2 of 3 mapped departments, and 40.0% leadership density.
Department seniority map
Multi-department seniority map
Visible department samples map 4 seniority-classified profiles across 3 departments and 2 seniority bands.
Department seniority evidence tier: Corroborated department seniority evidence. Department seniority evidence combines 4 seniority-classified profiles, 3 departments, 2 seniority bands, and top cell IT + Individual contributor with 2 profiles.
IT 2 profiles
Individual contributor: 2
Executive 1 profile
Director: 1
General 1 profile
Individual contributor: 1
2 leadership signals 1 departments with visible contacts
Department leader sample
Limited department leader sample
0 contactable

AeroLeads source data includes 1 leadership signal across 1 department; rows show titles and contact-channel presence only.

Department leader evidence tier: Limited department leader evidence. Department leader evidence combines 1 leadership signal and 1 department; raw contacts are hidden.
Leader Department Seniority Channel
Rebecca Parker
Director of Finance and HR at Lift Safe Ltd - Material Handling Specialists
Executive Director No visible contact channel
IT 3 signals
60.0% of mapped department signals, 1 leadership signals, 1 visible contact
General 1 signals
20.0% of mapped department signals
Executive 1 signals
20.0% of mapped department signals, 1 leadership signals

Technology talent signals

3 matched technology role signals, 2 with visible contact data.

Technology evidence tier
Reachable technology evidence
2 matched technology role signals include visible contact data.
Partial technology reachability 66.7%
Some matched technology role signals include visible contact data.
Technology reachability evidence tier: Partial technology reachability evidence. Technology reachability evidence combines 2 contactable technology signals, 3 matched technology signals, and 66.7% role contactability.
3 IT department signals
Engineering 3 profiles
100.0% of matched technology role signals
Matched role examples
Technical Support Engineer 1
Workshop Engineer 1
Field Engineer at Lift Safe Ltd - Material Handling Specialists 1

Workforce seniority mix

Aggregated from 7 classified profile signals.

Largest seniority band
Individual contributor
4 of 7 classified profile signals, 2 with visible contact data.
Official-domain seniority evidence: 1 seniority-classified profile across 1 tier includes company-domain email signals.
Corroborated seniority evidence: Seniority graph spans 7 classified profile signals across 3 tiers, with reachable evidence for 3 and company-domain evidence for 1. Balanced management-to-IC sample.
Management-to-IC proxy
Balanced management-to-IC sample
42.9%
managerial seniority signals
57.1%
contributor seniority signals
3 managerial seniority signals and 4 contributor signals appear in the visible seniority-classified sample.
Management-shape evidence tier: Balanced management-shape evidence. Management-shape evidence combines 7 seniority-classified signals, 3 managerial signals, 42.9% managerial share, and 4 contributor signals.
Individual contributor 4 profiles
57.1% of classified seniority signals, 2 with visible contact data
Manager 2 profiles
28.6% of classified seniority signals, 1 with visible contact data, 1 official-domain
Director 1 profile
14.3% of classified seniority signals

Workforce geography

Aggregated from 7 visible profile location signals.

Workforce geography evidence
Corroborated workforce geography evidence
Workforce geography spans 6 locations across 7 visible profile signals, with reachable evidence across 3 locations. Top workforce hub shares company country.
Distribution signal
Distributed workforce
Visible profile location signals are spread across 6 locations.
Workforce distribution model
Broad distributed workforce model
Visible profile locations are spread across 6 workforce locations, with Manchester Area, United Kingdom as the largest hub at 28%.
Corroborated workforce model evidence: Workforce model evidence combines 7 located profile signals, 6 workforce locations, 6 cities, 1 country, top hub Manchester Area, United Kingdom at 28%, company-location alignment, and 3 reachable locations.
Locations
6
Countries
1
Top hub share
28%
Workforce location footprint
Multi-city workforce footprint
Visible profile locations span 6 cities across 1 country, led by Manchester Area.
Cities
6
Countries
1
Company-location alignment
Top workforce hub shares company country
The largest visible workforce location is Manchester Area, United Kingdom, in the same country as company location Court, United Kingdom.
Top workforce hub share: 28.6%
Company-location evidence tier: Corroborated company-location alignment evidence. Company-location alignment evidence combines company location Court, United Kingdom, top workforce hub Manchester Area, United Kingdom, 28.6% top workforce hub share, and country match.
Contactable location spread
Multi-location contact coverage
Visible contact samples span 3 workforce locations, led by Manchester Area, United Kingdom.
Contactable location evidence tier: High-confidence contactable location evidence. Contactable location evidence combines 3 contactable profile location signals, 3 workforce locations, top contactable hub Manchester Area, United Kingdom at 33.3%, and company-location alignment.
Contactable workforce hub shares company country: The largest contactable workforce location is Manchester Area, United Kingdom, in the same country as company location Court, United Kingdom. Top contactable hub share: 33.3%.
Manchester Area, United Kingdom 1 contact
33.3% of contactable location signals
United Kingdom 1 contact
33.3% of contactable location signals
Oldham, England, United Kingdom 1 contact
33.3% of contactable location signals
Manchester Area, United Kingdom 2 profiles
28.6% of visible location signals
Sowerby Bridge, England, United Kingdom 1 profile
14.3% of visible location signals
United Kingdom 1 profile
14.3% of visible location signals
Oldham, England, United Kingdom 1 profile
14.3% of visible location signals
Gloucestershire, England, United Kingdom 1 profile
14.3% of visible location signals
Greater Manchester, England, United Kingdom 1 profile
14.3% of visible location signals

Decision-maker coverage

3 seniority signals, 1 with visible contact data.

Decision-maker evidence tier
Mapped decision-maker evidence
Decision-maker evidence covers 3 seniority signals, 1 reachable, and 1 company-domain. Buying committee spans 2 functions.
Account planning snapshot
Multi-signal account planning snapshot
Snapshot combines department reachability, decision-maker coverage, and buying-committee function aggregates.
3 account-planning evidence cards available.
Account planning evidence tier: Corroborated account planning evidence. Account planning evidence combines 3 aggregate account-planning cards, best covered outreach path, 1 official-domain decision-maker signal, Manager seniority reachability, and IT department contactability; raw contacts are hidden.
Best covered path
IT + Manager
Coverage combines 1 visible IT contact signal, 1 contactable Manager decision-maker signal, and 1 official-domain decision-maker email signal.
Most reachable seniority
Manager
1 of 2 signals in this seniority band include visible contact data.
Top reachable team
IT
1 visible contact signal in this department sample.
Partial decision-maker reachability 33.3%
Some mapped decision-maker signals include visible contact data.
Decision-maker reachability evidence tier: Partial decision-maker reachability evidence. Decision-maker reachability evidence combines 1 contactable decision-maker signal, 3 mapped decision-maker signals, 33.3% contactability, and 1 official-domain decision-maker signal.
Email-led decision-maker coverage: Mapped decision-maker contact data is strongest for email, with 1 email signals.
Buying committee function coverage
Multi-function buying-committee coverage
0 of 2 mapped functions include visible decision-maker contact data.
Mapped buying committee: Mapped decision-maker signals span 2 business functions.
Buying committee evidence tier: Mapped buying-committee evidence. Buying-committee evidence combines 2 mapped buying-committee functions and People / HR and Sales / revenue function coverage.
Buyer persona availability: Dual-persona buyer availability. Mapped decision-maker evidence covers People buyer and Revenue buyer; 0 of 2 buyer personas include visible contact data. Mapped buyer persona evidence: Buyer persona evidence combines 2 mapped buyer personas and People buyer and Revenue buyer coverage.
People / HR Sales / revenue
Most reachable seniority
Manager
1 of 2 seniority signals include visible contact data.
Seniority reachability evidence tier: Mapped seniority reachability evidence. Seniority reachability evidence combines 1 contactable Manager signal, 2 Manager signals, 50.0% tier contactability, 1 official-domain Manager signal, and email coverage.
Official-domain decision-maker coverage
Strong official-domain decision-maker coverage
1 contactable decision-maker signals match liftsafe.net. Most contactable decision-maker signals use liftsafe.net email coverage.
Official-domain decision-maker evidence tier: Strong official-domain decision-maker evidence. Official-domain decision-maker evidence combines 1 official-domain decision-maker signal, 1 contactable decision-maker signal, 100.0% official-domain coverage, and liftsafe.net domain match.
Manager 2 profiles
66.7% of mapped seniority signals, 1 with visible contact data
Director 1 profile
33.3% of mapped seniority signals

Role and function mix

7 visible titled profiles across 7 distinct role titles.

Title mix
Diverse role title sample
7 distinct role titles across 7 visible titled profiles.
Role-title evidence tier: Diverse role-title evidence. Role-title diversity evidence combines 7 visible titled profiles, 7 distinct role titles, and top title Area Sales Manager at Lift Safe Ltd at 14.3%.
Business function mix
Multi-function workforce sample
AeroLeads maps 5 visible profile signals into 3 business functions; 2 include visible contact data.
Business-function evidence tier: Corroborated business-function evidence. Business-function evidence combines 5 mapped function profile signals, 3 business functions, 2 contactable signals, 1 contactable function, and top function Technology / data at 60.0%.
Single-function contactability map 1 / 3 functions
1 of 3 mapped business functions include visible contact data.
Functional team estimates
Revenue and engineering team estimates
AeroLeads derives 1 visible revenue team profile signal and 3 visible engineering team profile signals from mapped business-function signals.
Corroborated functional team evidence: Functional team estimate evidence combines 1 visible revenue team profile signal and 3 visible engineering team profile signals.
Revenue team estimate 1 profile
20.0% of mapped function signals; Sales / revenue
Engineering team estimate 3 profiles
60.0% of mapped function signals, 2 with visible contact data; Technology / data
Technology / data 3 profiles
60.0% of mapped function signals, 2 with visible contact data
People / HR 1 profile
20.0% of mapped function signals
Sales / revenue 1 profile
20.0% of mapped function signals
Contactable role coverage
Diverse contactable role coverage
3 reachable role titles across 3 contactable titled profiles.
Contactable role evidence tier: Diverse contactable role evidence. Contactable role evidence combines 3 contactable titled profiles, 3 reachable role titles, and top reachable role Technical Manager at Lift Safe Ltd at 33.3%.
Role title reachability
Broad role-title reachability
3 of 7 distinct visible role titles include email or phone signals.
Role-title reachability evidence tier: Corroborated role-title reachability evidence. Role-title reachability evidence combines 7 visible role titles, 3 reachable titles, 42.9% title reachability, and 1 official-domain title.
Single-title official-domain reachability 1 / 7 titles
1 of 7 distinct visible role titles include email signals matching liftsafe.net.
Area Sales Manager at Lift Safe Ltd 1 profile
14.3% of visible titled profiles
Director of Finance and HR at Lift Safe Ltd - Material Handling Specialists 1 profile
14.3% of visible titled profiles
Field Engineer at Lift Safe Ltd - Material Handling Specialists 1 profile
14.3% of visible titled profiles
Technical Manager at Lift Safe Ltd 1 profile
14.3% of visible titled profiles
Technical Support Engineer 1 profile
14.3% of visible titled profiles
Van Driver at Lift Safe Ltd - Material Handling Specialists 1 profile
14.3% of visible titled profiles

Contactability signals

Contactability score 75.0%
3 of 4 visible profiles include email or phone signals.
Contact channel mix
Email-led contact coverage
Visible profile or company source data is strongest for email outreach.
Contact evidence tier
High-confidence contact evidence
2 current or verified professional email signals, 6 company-domain email signals, and email-led contact coverage; raw addresses and numbers are hidden.
Contact data safety
Corroborated privacy-safe contact intelligence
AeroLeads exposes contact counts, channel mix, freshness, and domain-alignment evidence while hiding raw email addresses and masking phone numbers in public output.
Aggregate signals
9
Channel coverage
Email aggregate coverage
Evidence groups
5
Corroborated contact-safety evidence: Contact-safety evidence combines visible profile contact sample, company email sample, current email metadata, dated contact metadata, and official-domain email evidence; public schema uses aggregate variables only.
Aggregate-only contact schema: Dataset variables use counts, rates, channel labels, freshness bands, and domain-alignment metrics instead of raw contact values.
Best covered outreach path
IT + Manager
Coverage combines 1 visible IT contact signal, 1 contactable Manager decision-maker signal, and 1 official-domain decision-maker email signal.
Outreach path evidence tier: Corroborated outreach path evidence. Outreach path evidence combines 1 visible IT contact signal, 1 contactable Manager decision-maker signal, and 1 official-domain decision-maker email signal; raw contacts are hidden.
Email usability mix
Current email coverage sample
AeroLeads source data includes 3 unique visible email signals; 2 are marked current or verified and 2 are professional-type. Raw addresses are hidden.
Email usability evidence tier: Corroborated email usability evidence. Email usability evidence combines 3 unique email signals, 2 current or verified, 2 professional-type, and 66.7% current signal rate; raw addresses are hidden.
2 current or verified 2 professional-type 66.7% current signal rate
Contact freshness
Dated contact metadata
AeroLeads source data includes 6 dated contact records; 0 fall within 90 days and 0 fall within 12 months of the Jun 2026 source update. Raw emails and phone numbers are hidden.
Contact freshness evidence tier: Dated contact freshness evidence. Contact freshness evidence combines 6 dated contact records, email timestamps, and 6 official-domain dated email records.
6 dated records 0 within 90 days 0.0% fresh rate 0 within 12 months Latest Oct 2021
Dated email metadata: Dated contact records include 6 email records.
Dated official-domain contact metadata: 6 dated official-domain email records; 0 fall within 12 months of the Jun 2026 source update.
Visible people
4
With contact data
3
Email coverage
3
75.0% of visible profiles
Company email sample
Limited company email sample
AeroLeads source data includes 6 email records across 1 domain; raw addresses are hidden. 6 match liftsafe.net.
Source email evidence tier: High-confidence source email evidence. Source email evidence combines 6 unique source email records, 1 domain, 6 matching liftsafe.net, and 100.0% official-domain rate.

Email domain intelligence

1 of 3 visible email signals match liftsafe.net.

Mixed-domain coverage: Visible email signals include official-domain and non-official domains.
Email identity evidence tier: Mixed email identity evidence. Email identity evidence combines 3 visible email signals, 1 matching liftsafe.net, 1 person with official-domain email, 33.3% official-domain match, and 2 other-domain signals.
33.3% domain match 1 person with official-domain email 2 non-official email signals

Department contact samples

Focused department contact spread: Visible contact samples appear in 1 of 3 mapped departments.
Department contactability evidence tier: Limited department contactability evidence. Department contactability evidence combines 1 visible contact sample, 1 of 3 mapped departments, and 1 email signal; raw contacts are hidden.
Department Contacts Email Official email Phone
IT 1 1 0 0
Top email pattern: flast at 100.0% of matched patterns.
Format example: [first_initial][last]@liftsafe.net
Dominant pattern: One email pattern accounts for most matched examples.
Email pattern evidence tier: High-confidence email pattern evidence. Email pattern evidence combines 1 matched pattern, 100.0% top-pattern share, and format example for liftsafe.net.
flast 100.0%
3 of 4 visible Lift Safe Ltd - Material Handling Specialists profiles include email or phone signals. Review people graph
The strongest Lift Safe Ltd - Material Handling Specialists email pattern signal is [first_initial][last] , representing 100.0% of matched email-pattern evidence in the AeroLeads company graph.
In total, AeroLeads has detected 1 aggregate email-pattern signals for Lift Safe Ltd - Material Handling Specialists. View the detailed email format page .

Lift Safe Ltd - Material Handling Specialists Email Pattern Intelligence Snapshot

These aggregate patterns support the company intelligence page. The dedicated email-format workflow lives on Lift Safe Ltd - Material Handling Specialists email format .

Observed pattern
Example pattern
[first_initial][last]
[first_initial][last]@liftsafe.net
100%

Lift Safe Ltd - Material Handling Specialists Questions

News

Liftsafe Fall Protection Inc. - Aviation Pros

Liftsafe Fall Protection Inc. Aviation Pros

Gold prices climb as tariff jitters lift safe-haven demand - Ammon News

Gold prices climb as tariff jitters lift safe-haven demand Ammon News

Manufacturing Safety - Canadian Metalworking

Manufacturing Safety Canadian Metalworking

Lift Safe solves a reel problem for Mission Foods - Grocery Trader

Lift Safe solves a reel problem for Mission Foods Grocery Trader

Gold holds near record peak as trade jitters lift safe-haven demand - Ammon News

Gold holds near record peak as trade jitters lift safe-haven demand Ammon News

Damien is STEP ahead - Manchester Evening News

Damien is STEP ahead Manchester Evening News

Lift Safe Ltd - Material Handling Specialists people graph sample