M.A.C. Construction, Inc.

M.A.C. Construction, Inc. Intelligence, Employees & Contact Signals

Contact coverage
Email + phone
Visible profile or company source data includes email and phone channels. 2 visible profiles include direct contact evidence.
People graph depth
9 signals
Deep profile graph across 2 mapped departments.
Account research
6 steps
Account research checklist combines person-level contact coverage, ICP fit, technology workforce evidence, related-company graph, domain trust, and people graph depth; raw contact values are hidden.
Technology talent
1
Technology-oriented role signals in the workforce graph.
Evidence quality 100/100 Priority intelligence record

AeroLeads company intelligence

M.A.C. Construction, Inc. workforce and contactability signals

Evidence from AeroLeads company records, matched professional profiles, and related company graph.

High confidence
Intelligence completeness
Partial intelligence record
6 of 11 major intelligence groups are available for this company.
Largest mapped team
IT
2 profile signals in IT.
Departments mapped
2
Workforce composition from AeroLeads profile data.
Profile graph
Deep profile graph
9 mapped workforce signals against a 12 employee size estimate.
Top seniority band
Individual contributor
9 of 10 classified profile signals.
Visible contact sample
2
Displayed people with email or phone data.
Technology talent
2
Technology roles and departments found in workforce signals.

Profile graph researchability

Visible people graph includes 10 visible people: 10 named, 10 titled, 10 located, and 2 contactable.

Multi-signal profile graph
Profile coverage evidence tier: Deep profile coverage evidence. Profile coverage evidence combines 9 mapped workforce signals, 12 employee size estimate, and 75.0% profile graph coverage.
Corroborated profile graph evidence: Researchability is based on 10 visible people with 4 populated evidence dimensions: named, titled, located, and contactable signals.
Profile association confidence: Profile association sample. Association confidence combines 10 titled profiles and 2 contactable profiles.
People
10
Named
10
Titled
10
Located
10
Contactable
2

Data methodology

AeroLeads renders only source-backed fields for this company page.

5 source groups
Company record Matched profile graph Email-pattern aggregate Related company graph Company signal fields
Blank source fields are omitted
Related companies are ordered deterministically
Structured data uses aggregate counts only

Intelligence completeness

6 of 11 major intelligence groups are available for this company.

6 / 11 groups
Partial intelligence record 54.5%
Workforce composition Contactability Email intelligence Technology talent Domain confidence Market and peer context

Evidence quality

This page clears the 60+ AeroLeads company-intelligence evidence threshold.

100 / 100
Priority intelligence record Threshold 60+
Workforce composition Employee email coverage Employee phone coverage Department seniority map Role title reachability Technology talent
Workforce graph
18 signals
Workforce composition, Department seniority map, Role title reachability
Contactability
8 signals
Employee email coverage, Employee phone coverage, Contact channel mix
Technology intelligence
1 signal
Technology talent
Market and peer context
14 signals
Related company graph, Peer graph strength, Peer position benchmark
Company momentum
3 signals
Company signal breadth, Company momentum score, Company ownership signal
Source trust
8 signals
Domain confidence, Intelligence completeness, Company description
Decision-maker intelligence
3 signals
Leadership signals, Department leadership coverage, Account research checklist
49 additional source-backed evidence signals are counted in this page quality score.

Prospecting readiness

M.A.C. Construction, Inc. shows research-first prospecting fit based on person-level contact coverage, technology workforce evidence, people graph depth, and peer context.

45 / 100
Research-first prospecting fit Corroborated prospecting evidence

Prospecting evidence combines person-level contact coverage, technology workforce evidence, people graph depth, and peer context; raw contact values are hidden.

ICP fit
Qualified ICP fit

ICP fit combines company size, market specificity, contactability, and technology path; raw contact values are hidden.

60 / 100
Company size
12 employees
Employee estimate is in a common outbound prospecting range.
Market specificity
Tagged market profile
2 category and specialty signals in the company record.
Reachability
Mapped contact-channel evidence
Visible profile or company source data includes email and phone channels.
Technology path
Mapped technology evidence
1 matched technology role signal found in the workforce graph.
Account research checklist
Multi-step account research checklist

Account research checklist combines person-level contact coverage, ICP fit, technology workforce evidence, related-company graph, domain trust, and people graph depth; raw contact values are hidden.

6 steps
Confirm contact coverage
Mapped contact-channel evidence
Visible profile or company source data includes email and phone channels.
Validate ICP fit
Qualified ICP fit
ICP fit combines company size, market specificity, contactability, and technology path; raw contact values are hidden.
Review technology path
Mapped technology evidence
1 matched technology role signal found in the workforce graph.
Compare related peers
Limited peer comparison
Compares this company with related-company evidence across employee scale and peer graph evidence.
Check domain trust
Mixed domain alignment
Domain evidence combines website domain and social profile; raw email addresses are hidden.
Review people graph depth
Deep profile graph
9 mapped workforce signals against a 12 employee size estimate.
Contact coverage
Mapped contact-channel evidence
Visible profile or company source data includes email and phone channels.
Technology contact path
Mapped technology evidence
1 matched technology role signal found in the workforce graph.
People graph depth
Deep profile graph
9 mapped workforce signals against a 12 employee size estimate.
Peer context
Multi-signal peer benchmark evidence
Peer benchmark combines 10 related companies with peer graph strength, size benchmark, and size position. Underlying peer graph includes 4 evidence types: industry context, employee benchmarks, website records, social profiles.
Decision-maker evidence missing: No mapped decision-maker cluster is strong enough to summarize.

Domain trust signals

Domain confidence for macconstruction-inc.net is based on website domain and social profile.

35 / 100
Mixed domain alignment Limited domain evidence

Domain evidence combines website domain and social profile; raw email addresses are hidden.

Website domain
macconstruction-inc.net
The official website domain is available from the company source record.
Social profile
LinkedIn organization page
A LinkedIn organization page is present for this company record.
Employee email mismatch: Visible employee email signals do not match the official domain.

AeroLeads coverage snapshot

Profile sample
4
Visible people attached to this company page.
Profile graph depth
Deep profile graph
9 mapped workforce signals against a 12 employee size estimate.
Contactable sample
2
Visible people with email or phone data.
Contact channel mix
Multi-channel contact coverage
Visible profile or company source data includes email and phone channels.
Contact evidence confidence
Mapped contact-channel evidence
Visible profile or company source data includes email and phone channels.
Department coverage
2
Departments represented in AeroLeads workforce signals.
Department concentration
Department-concentrated workforce
Most mapped workforce signals are in General.
Leadership signals
2
Department lead or leadership signals in the org data.
Department leader sample
Limited department leader sample
AeroLeads source data includes 1 leadership signal across 1 department; rows show titles and contact-channel presence only.
Department leadership coverage
Focused department leadership coverage
Leadership signals appear in 1 of 2 mapped departments.
Leadership density
22.20
Percent of mapped department signals that are leadership signals.
Department seniority map
Two-department seniority map
Visible department samples map 8 seniority-classified profiles across 2 departments and 2 seniority bands.
Technology talent
1
Visible profiles matching technology role patterns.
Technology evidence confidence
Mapped technology evidence
1 matched technology role signal found in the workforce graph.
Technology department signals
2
Mapped department profile signals in technology-oriented teams.
Email domain confidence
Non-official email coverage
Visible email signals use non-official domains only.
Domain confidence
Mixed domain alignment
Domain confidence for macconstruction-inc.net is based on website domain and social profile.
Contact data safety
Limited privacy-safe contact intelligence
AeroLeads exposes contact counts, channel mix, freshness, and domain-alignment evidence while hiding raw email addresses and masking phone numbers in public output.
Company signal breadth
Multi-signal company record
Company-level signals include social audience, company maturity, and ownership.
Company momentum score
Limited company momentum score
Momentum score blends contactability and peer position from AeroLeads company and profile evidence.
Company ownership signal
Private company record
Company source record includes source type Privately Held.
Audience density
Low audience density
139 followers against 12 employee estimate, about 11.60 followers per estimated employee.
Specialty signals
1
Specialty tags in the company record.
Market specificity
Tagged market profile
2 category and specialty signals in the company record.
Peer industry clusters
5
Industries represented by related company records.
Related companies
10
Company graph links available for comparison.
Industry benchmark
Evidence-backed industry benchmark
Industry benchmark uses 10 related companies, 4 same-industry peers, 3 benchmark dimensions, and 4 peer evidence types from the AeroLeads related-company graph.
Peer benchmark confidence
Multi-signal peer benchmark evidence
Peer benchmark combines 10 related companies with peer graph strength, size benchmark, and size position. Underlying peer graph includes 4 evidence types: industry context, employee benchmarks, website records, social profiles.
Peer position benchmark
Employee-scale peer position benchmark
Peer-position benchmark shows employee scale above 30% of 10 comparable related peers.
Peer comparison matrix
Limited peer comparison
Compares this company with related-company evidence across employee scale and peer graph evidence.
Workforce locations
10
Locations represented in visible profile signals.
Workforce distribution
Distributed workforce
Visible profile location signals are spread across 10 locations.
Workforce location footprint
Multi-country workforce footprint
Visible profile locations span 10 cities across 4 countries, led by Fort Lauderdale.
Workforce distribution model
International distributed workforce model
Visible profile locations span 4 countries and 10 workforce locations; no single hub exceeds 10% of visible location signals.
Workforce geography evidence confidence
Corroborated workforce geography evidence
Workforce geography spans 10 locations across 10 visible profile signals, with reachable evidence across 2 locations. Top workforce hub shares company country.
Contactable workforce locations
2
Workforce locations represented by visible contact samples.
Top contactable workforce location
Miami, Florida, United States
Visible contact samples span 2 workforce locations, led by Miami, Florida, United States.
Workforce seniority tiers
2
Seniority bands derived from visible profile titles and levels.
Seniority evidence confidence
Corroborated seniority evidence
Seniority graph spans 10 classified profile signals across 2 tiers, with reachable evidence for 2. Contributor-heavy visible sample.
Classified seniority profiles
10
Visible profiles with usable seniority signals.
Management-to-IC proxy
Contributor-heavy visible sample
0 managerial seniority signals and 10 contributor signals appear in the visible seniority-classified sample.
Role title diversity
Diverse role title sample
10 distinct role titles across 10 visible titled profiles.
Visible role titles
10
Distinct role titles found in visible profile signals.
Contactable role titles
2
Distinct role titles with visible contact samples.
Contactable role coverage
Mixed contactable role coverage
2 reachable role titles, led by Construction, Development, and Law at 50.0% of contactable titled profiles.
Prospecting fit
Research-first prospecting fit
M.A.C. Construction, Inc. shows research-first prospecting fit based on person-level contact coverage, technology workforce evidence, people graph depth, and peer context.
ICP fit
Qualified ICP fit
M.A.C. Construction, Inc. matches the qualified ICP fit band for common outbound filters based on company size, market specificity, contactability, and technology path.
Account research checklist
Multi-step account research checklist
Account research checklist combines person-level contact coverage, ICP fit, technology workforce evidence, related-company graph, domain trust, and people graph depth; raw contact values are hidden.
Intelligence signal groups
17
AeroLeads signal groups available for this company.

Market focus signals

Primary industry
Construction
Market specificity
Tagged market profile
2 category and specialty signals in the company record.
Market evidence tier
High-confidence market evidence
Market evidence combines 7 classification signals from categories, specialties, related peer industries, and description keywords. 6 description-backed keyword signals are included.
Industry benchmark
Evidence-backed industry benchmark
Industry benchmark uses 10 related companies, 4 same-industry peers, 3 benchmark dimensions, and 4 peer evidence types from the AeroLeads related-company graph.
Top peer industry
Construction
40% of 10 related peer industry signals.
Peer benchmark evidence
Multi-signal peer benchmark evidence
Peer benchmark combines 10 related companies with peer graph strength, size benchmark, and size position. Underlying peer graph includes 4 evidence types: industry context, employee benchmarks, website records, social profiles.
Size position
Smaller than most related peers
7 of 10 related employee-estimated peers are higher.
Peer graph strength
Benchmark-ready peer graph
Related peer graph has industry context, employee benchmarks, website records, and social profiles across 10 related companies.
Benchmark dimensions: peer graph strength, size benchmark, and size position.
Categories
Construction
Specialties
Manager jobs
Product-market keyword evidence
Description-backed market keywords
Keyword evidence comes from 3 source field groups: Category, Specialty, Description.
Product-market keyword evidence tier: High-confidence product-market keyword evidence. Product-market keyword evidence combines 8 unique market keywords, 3 source field groups, and 6 description-backed keywords (1 category, 1 specialty, and 6 description).
Construction · Category Manager jobs · Specialty journey began · Description vision rooted · Description excellence founded · Description burgeoning need · Description marries quality · Description years nurtured · Description
Related peer industries
Peer-industry evidence tier: High-confidence peer-industry evidence. Peer-industry evidence combines 10 related companies, 5 peer-industry clusters, and top peer industry Construction at 40.0%.
Construction 4 peers
40.0% of related peer industries
Hospitals and Health Care 3 peers
30.0% of related peer industries
Public Safety 1 peer
10.0% of related peer industries
Maritime Transportation 1 peer
10.0% of related peer industries
Medical Practices 1 peer
10.0% of related peer industries

Company signals

Company signal breadth
Multi-signal company record
Company-level signals include social audience, company maturity, and ownership.
Corroborated company record evidence: Company record evidence combines 3 source-backed company signal types: social audience, company maturity, and ownership.
Social audience
139
Followers in the company source record.
Social audience evidence tier: Limited social-audience evidence. Social audience evidence uses 139 followers from source field social_followers.
Audience density
Low audience density
139 followers against 12 employee estimate, about 11.60 followers per estimated employee.
Audience-density evidence tier: Limited audience-density evidence. Audience-density evidence combines 139 social followers, 12 employee estimate, and 11.60 followers per estimated employee.
Company maturity
Mature company record
Company source record includes founding year 1996, about 30 years before 2026.
Company maturity evidence tier: Long-running maturity evidence. Maturity evidence combines founding year 1996, 30 years of company history, and source field founded.
Company ownership
Private company record
Company source record includes source type Privately Held.
Company ownership evidence tier: Structured ownership evidence. Ownership evidence combines source type Privately Held from structured company source fields.

Workforce composition

Department concentration
Department-concentrated workforce
Most mapped workforce signals are in General. 77.8% of mapped department signals are in the largest department.
Department concentration evidence tier: Concentrated department evidence. Department concentration evidence combines 2 mapped departments, top department General, and 77.8% top-department share.
Department leadership coverage
Focused department leadership coverage
Leadership signals appear in 1 of 2 mapped departments. Leadership signals represent 22.2% of mapped department signals.
Department leadership evidence tier: Limited department leadership evidence. Department leadership evidence combines 2 leadership signals, 1 of 2 mapped departments, and 22.2% leadership density.
Department seniority map
Two-department seniority map
Visible department samples map 8 seniority-classified profiles across 2 departments and 2 seniority bands.
Department seniority evidence tier: Corroborated department seniority evidence. Department seniority evidence combines 8 seniority-classified profiles, 2 departments, 2 seniority bands, and top cell General + Individual contributor with 5 profiles.
General 6 profiles
Senior / Lead: 1 Individual contributor: 5
IT 2 profiles
Individual contributor: 2
2 leadership signals
Department leader sample
Limited department leader sample
0 contactable

AeroLeads source data includes 1 leadership signal across 1 department; rows show titles and contact-channel presence only.

Department leader evidence tier: Limited department leader evidence. Department leader evidence combines 1 leadership signal and 1 department; raw contacts are hidden.
Leader Department Seniority Channel
Michael Erbs
Office Management at M.a.c. Construction, Inc.
General Individual contributor No visible contact channel
General 7 signals
77.8% of mapped department signals, 2 leadership signals
IT 2 signals
22.2% of mapped department signals

Technology talent signals

1 matched technology role signals.

Technology evidence tier
Mapped technology evidence
1 matched technology role signal found in the workforce graph.
2 IT department signals
Engineering 1 profile
100.0% of matched technology role signals
Matched role examples
Engineer at M.a.c. Construction, Inc. 1

Workforce seniority mix

Aggregated from 10 classified profile signals.

Largest seniority band
Individual contributor
9 of 10 classified profile signals, 2 with visible contact data.
Corroborated seniority evidence: Seniority graph spans 10 classified profile signals across 2 tiers, with reachable evidence for 2. Contributor-heavy visible sample.
Management-to-IC proxy
Contributor-heavy visible sample
0.0%
managerial seniority signals
100.0%
contributor seniority signals
0 managerial seniority signals and 10 contributor signals appear in the visible seniority-classified sample.
Management-shape evidence tier: Contributor-heavy management-shape evidence. Management-shape evidence combines 10 seniority-classified signals, 0 managerial signals, 0.0% managerial share, and 10 contributor signals.
Individual contributor 9 profiles
90.0% of classified seniority signals, 2 with visible contact data
Senior / Lead 1 profile
10.0% of classified seniority signals

Workforce geography

Aggregated from 10 visible profile location signals.

Workforce geography evidence
Corroborated workforce geography evidence
Workforce geography spans 10 locations across 10 visible profile signals, with reachable evidence across 2 locations. Top workforce hub shares company country.
Distribution signal
Distributed workforce
Visible profile location signals are spread across 10 locations.
Workforce distribution model
International distributed workforce model
Visible profile locations span 4 countries and 10 workforce locations; no single hub exceeds 10% of visible location signals.
Corroborated workforce model evidence: Workforce model evidence combines 10 located profile signals, 10 workforce locations, 10 cities, 4 countries, top hub Fort Lauderdale, Florida, United States at 10%, company-location alignment, and 2 reachable locations.
Locations
10
Countries
4
Top hub share
10%
Workforce location footprint
Multi-country workforce footprint
Visible profile locations span 10 cities across 4 countries, led by Fort Lauderdale.
Cities
10
Countries
4
Company-location alignment
Top workforce hub shares company country
The largest visible workforce location is Fort Lauderdale, Florida, United States, in the same country as company location Doral, Florida, United States.
Top workforce hub share: 10.0%
Company-location evidence tier: Corroborated company-location alignment evidence. Company-location alignment evidence combines company location Doral, Florida, United States, top workforce hub Fort Lauderdale, Florida, United States, 10.0% top workforce hub share, and country match.
Contactable location spread
Multi-location contact coverage
Visible contact samples span 2 workforce locations, led by Miami, Florida, United States.
Contactable location evidence tier: Multi-location contactable evidence. Contactable location evidence combines 2 contactable profile location signals, 2 workforce locations, top contactable hub Miami, Florida, United States at 50.0%, and company-location alignment.
Contactable workforce hub shares company country: The largest contactable workforce location is Miami, Florida, United States, in the same country as company location Doral, Florida, United States. Top contactable hub share: 50.0%.
Miami, Florida, United States 1 contact
50.0% of contactable location signals
Greater Chicago Area, United States 1 contact
50.0% of contactable location signals
Fort Lauderdale, Florida, United States 1 profile
10.0% of visible location signals
Canada 1 profile
10.0% of visible location signals
Miami, Florida, United States 1 profile
10.0% of visible location signals
Greater Chicago Area, United States 1 profile
10.0% of visible location signals
Austell, Georgia, United States 1 profile
10.0% of visible location signals
Lahore District, Punjab, Pakistan 1 profile
10.0% of visible location signals

Role and function mix

10 visible titled profiles across 10 distinct role titles.

Title mix
Diverse role title sample
10 distinct role titles across 10 visible titled profiles.
Role-title evidence tier: Diverse role-title evidence. Role-title diversity evidence combines 10 visible titled profiles, 10 distinct role titles, and top title Architect at M.a.c. Construction, Inc. at 10.0%.
Contactable role coverage
Mixed contactable role coverage
2 reachable role titles, led by Construction, Development, and Law at 50.0% of contactable titled profiles.
Contactable role evidence tier: Corroborated contactable role evidence. Contactable role evidence combines 2 contactable titled profiles, 2 reachable role titles, and top reachable role Construction, Development, and Law at 50.0%.
Role title reachability
Partial role-title reachability
2 of 10 distinct visible role titles include email or phone signals.
Role-title reachability evidence tier: Corroborated role-title reachability evidence. Role-title reachability evidence combines 10 visible role titles, 2 reachable titles, and 20.0% title reachability.
Architect at M.a.c. Construction, Inc. 1 profile
10.0% of visible titled profiles
Construccion En M.a.c. Construction 1 profile
10.0% of visible titled profiles
Construction, Development, and Law 1 profile
10.0% of visible titled profiles
Engineer at M.a.c. Construction, Inc. 1 profile
10.0% of visible titled profiles
Mac Specialist at M.a.c. Construction, Inc. 1 profile
10.0% of visible titled profiles
Montessori Teacher 1 profile
10.0% of visible titled profiles

Contactability signals

Contactability score 50.0%
2 of 4 visible profiles include email or phone signals.
Contact channel mix
Multi-channel contact coverage
Visible profile or company source data includes email and phone channels.
Contact evidence tier
Mapped contact-channel evidence
Visible profile or company source data includes email and phone channels.
Contact data safety
Limited privacy-safe contact intelligence
AeroLeads exposes contact counts, channel mix, freshness, and domain-alignment evidence while hiding raw email addresses and masking phone numbers in public output.
Aggregate signals
2
Channel coverage
Email and phone aggregate coverage
Evidence groups
1
Limited contact-safety evidence: Contact-safety evidence combines visible profile contact sample; public schema uses aggregate variables only.
Aggregate-only contact schema: Dataset variables use counts, rates, channel labels, freshness bands, and domain-alignment metrics instead of raw contact values.
Visible people
4
With contact data
2
Email coverage
2
50.0% of visible profiles
Phone coverage
1
25.0% of visible profiles

Email domain intelligence

0 of 4 visible email signals match macconstruction-inc.net.

Non-official email coverage: Visible email signals use non-official domains only.
Email identity evidence tier: Non-official email identity evidence. Email identity evidence combines 4 visible email signals and 4 personal-domain signals.
0.0% domain match 0 people with official-domain email 4 non-official email signals
At M.A.C. Construction, Inc., our journey began with a vision rooted in excellence. Founded in 1996, our company emerged to address the burgeoning need for construction expertise that marries quality with precision. We planted our roots in Miami, FL and, over the years, nurtured a reputation as a trusted leader in the industry. From our modest beginnings to our expansion across Georgia, M.A.C. Construction, Inc. has evolved into a cornerstone of construction excellence. Today, we specialize in a diverse range of construction categories, including: Commercial construction Education facilities Retail spaces Class A Office Buildings Residential developments Government projects Healthcare And more... Our journey over 25 years has witnessed our team grow and our core values solidify: integrity, innovation, and client satisfaction. We take immense pride in being a team you can confidently entrust with your construction aspirations.
Explore visible people signals for M.A.C. Construction, Inc. by role, title, or keyword.

2 of 4 visible profiles include email or phone signals in AeroLeads.

M.A.C. Construction, Inc. Questions

M.A.C. Construction, Inc. people graph sample