Nanolink
Company intelligence Management

Nanolink Company Intelligence, Employees & Contact Signals

Contact coverage
Email-led
Visible profile or company source data includes email and phone channels. 1 visible profile includes direct contact evidence.
People graph depth
4 signals
Deep profile graph across 2 mapped departments.
Account research
6 steps
Account research checklist combines person-level contact coverage, ICP fit, technology workforce evidence, related-company graph, domain trust, and people graph depth; raw contact values are hidden.
Technology talent
2
Technology-oriented role signals in the workforce graph.
Evidence quality 100/100 Priority intelligence record

AeroLeads company intelligence

Nanolink workforce and contactability signals

Evidence from AeroLeads company records, matched professional profiles, and related company graph.

High confidence
Intelligence completeness
Partial intelligence record
5 of 11 major intelligence groups are available for this company.
Largest mapped team
IT
1 profile signals in IT.
Departments mapped
2
Workforce composition from AeroLeads profile data.
Profile graph
Deep profile graph
4 mapped workforce signals against a 12 employee size estimate.
Top reachable team
General
1 visible contact signal.
Top seniority band
Individual contributor
4 of 5 classified profile signals.
Visible contact sample
1
Displayed people with email or phone data.

Profile graph researchability

Visible people graph includes 5 visible people: 5 named, 5 titled, 5 located, and 1 contactable.

Multi-signal profile graph
Profile coverage evidence tier: Deep profile coverage evidence. Profile coverage evidence combines 4 mapped workforce signals, 12 employee size estimate, and 33.3% profile graph coverage.
Corroborated profile graph evidence: Researchability is based on 5 visible people with 4 populated evidence dimensions: named, titled, located, and contactable signals.
Profile association confidence: Profile association sample. Association confidence combines 5 titled profiles and 1 contactable profile.
People
5
Named
5
Titled
5
Located
5
Contactable
1

Data methodology

AeroLeads renders only source-backed fields for this company page.

4 source groups
Company record Matched profile graph Related company graph Company signal fields
Blank source fields are omitted
Related companies are ordered deterministically
Structured data uses aggregate counts only

Intelligence completeness

5 of 11 major intelligence groups are available for this company.

5 / 11 groups
Partial intelligence record 45.5%
Workforce composition Contactability Technology talent Domain confidence Market and peer context

Evidence quality

This page clears the 60+ AeroLeads company-intelligence evidence threshold.

100 / 100
Priority intelligence record Threshold 60+
Workforce composition Employee email coverage Department contactability Department seniority map Technology talent Related company graph
Workforce graph
16 signals
Workforce composition, Department contactability, Department seniority map
Contactability
8 signals
Employee email coverage, Support email, Support phone
Technology intelligence
2 signals
Technology talent, Technology leadership
Market and peer context
13 signals
Related company graph, Peer graph strength, Peer position benchmark
Company momentum
3 signals
Company signal breadth, Company momentum score, Company ownership signal
Source trust
9 signals
Domain confidence, Multi-source domain alignment, Intelligence completeness
Decision-maker intelligence
1 signal
Account research checklist
46 additional source-backed evidence signals are counted in this page quality score.

Prospecting readiness

Nanolink shows research-first prospecting fit based on person-level contact coverage, technology workforce evidence, people graph depth, and peer context.

45 / 100
Research-first prospecting fit Corroborated prospecting evidence

Prospecting evidence combines person-level contact coverage, technology workforce evidence, people graph depth, and peer context; raw contact values are hidden.

ICP fit
Qualified ICP fit

ICP fit combines company size, market specificity, contactability, technology path, and domain trust; raw contact values are hidden.

70 / 100
Company size
12 employees
Employee estimate is in a common outbound prospecting range.
Market specificity
Focused market profile
10 market classification signals across categories, specialties, and related peer industries.
Reachability
Mapped contact-channel evidence
Visible profile or company source data includes email and phone channels.
Technology path
Mapped technology evidence
2 matched technology role signals found in the workforce graph.
Domain trust
Corroborated domain alignment
Domain evidence combines website domain, social profile, company email sample, and support email alignment; raw email addresses are hidden.
Account research checklist
Multi-step account research checklist

Account research checklist combines person-level contact coverage, ICP fit, technology workforce evidence, related-company graph, domain trust, and people graph depth; raw contact values are hidden.

6 steps
Confirm contact coverage
Mapped contact-channel evidence
Visible profile or company source data includes email and phone channels.
Validate ICP fit
Qualified ICP fit
ICP fit combines company size, market specificity, contactability, technology path, and domain trust; raw contact values are hidden.
Review technology path
Mapped technology evidence
2 matched technology role signals found in the workforce graph.
Compare related peers
Limited peer comparison
Compares this company with related-company evidence across employee scale and peer graph evidence.
Check domain trust
Corroborated domain alignment
Domain evidence combines website domain, social profile, company email sample, and support email alignment; raw email addresses are hidden.
Review people graph depth
Deep profile graph
4 mapped workforce signals against a 12 employee size estimate.
Contact coverage
Mapped contact-channel evidence
Visible profile or company source data includes email and phone channels.
Technology contact path
Mapped technology evidence
2 matched technology role signals found in the workforce graph.
People graph depth
Deep profile graph
4 mapped workforce signals against a 12 employee size estimate.
Peer context
Multi-signal peer benchmark evidence
Peer benchmark combines 9 related companies with peer graph strength, size benchmark, and size position. Underlying peer graph includes 3 evidence types: employee benchmarks, website records, social profiles.
Decision-maker evidence missing: No mapped decision-maker cluster is strong enough to summarize.

Domain trust signals

Domain confidence for nanolink.com is based on website domain, social profile, company email sample, and support email alignment.

55 / 100
Corroborated domain alignment Corroborated domain evidence

Domain evidence combines website domain, social profile, company email sample, and support email alignment; raw email addresses are hidden.

Website domain
nanolink.com
The official website domain is available from the company source record.
Social profile
LinkedIn organization page
A LinkedIn organization page is present for this company record.
Company email sample
1 official-domain source email records
Company-level email source records include official-domain coverage; raw addresses are hidden.
Support email alignment
Official-domain support email
The support email channel aligns with the official company domain; raw addresses are hidden.

AeroLeads coverage snapshot

Profile sample
4
Visible people attached to this company page.
Profile graph depth
Deep profile graph
4 mapped workforce signals against a 12 employee size estimate.
Contactable sample
1
Visible people with email or phone data.
Contact channel mix
Multi-channel contact coverage
Visible profile or company source data includes email and phone channels.
Contact evidence confidence
Mapped contact-channel evidence
Visible profile or company source data includes email and phone channels.
Company support channels
Email and phone
Company record includes support email and phone contact channels.
Department coverage
2
Departments represented in AeroLeads workforce signals.
Department concentration
Department-concentrated workforce
Most mapped workforce signals are in General.
Department contact coverage
1
Departments with visible contact samples.
Department contact spread
Focused department contact spread
Visible contact samples appear in 1 of 2 mapped departments.
Department seniority map
Two-department leadership-depth map
Visible department samples map 4 seniority-classified profiles across 2 departments and 1 seniority band.
Technology talent
2
Visible profiles matching technology role patterns.
Technology evidence confidence
Mapped technology evidence
2 matched technology role signals found in the workforce graph.
Technology department signals
1
Mapped department profile signals in technology-oriented teams.
Domain confidence
Corroborated domain alignment
Domain confidence for nanolink.com is based on website domain, social profile, company email sample, and support email alignment.
Contact data safety
Corroborated privacy-safe contact intelligence
AeroLeads exposes contact counts, channel mix, freshness, and domain-alignment evidence while hiding raw email addresses and masking phone numbers in public output.
Company signal breadth
Multi-signal company record
Company-level signals include social audience, company maturity, and ownership.
Company momentum score
Limited company momentum score
Momentum score blends partial contactability and peer position from AeroLeads company and profile evidence.
Company ownership signal
Public company record
Company source record includes source type Public Company.
Audience density
Moderate audience density
261 followers against 12 employee estimate, about 21.80 followers per estimated employee.
Specialty signals
4
Specialty tags in the company record.
Market specificity
Focused market profile
10 market classification signals across categories, specialties, and related peer industries.
Peer industry clusters
9
Industries represented by related company records.
Related companies
9
Company graph links available for comparison.
Industry benchmark
Peer-informed industry benchmark
Industry benchmark uses 9 related companies, 3 benchmark dimensions, and 3 peer evidence types from the AeroLeads related-company graph.
Peer benchmark confidence
Multi-signal peer benchmark evidence
Peer benchmark combines 9 related companies with peer graph strength, size benchmark, and size position. Underlying peer graph includes 3 evidence types: employee benchmarks, website records, social profiles.
Peer position benchmark
Employee-scale peer position benchmark
Peer-position benchmark shows employee scale above 100% of 7 comparable related peers.
Peer comparison matrix
Limited peer comparison
Compares this company with related-company evidence across employee scale and peer graph evidence.
Workforce locations
5
Locations represented in visible profile signals.
Workforce distribution
Distributed workforce
Visible profile location signals are spread across 5 locations.
Workforce location footprint
Multi-city workforce footprint
Visible profile locations span 5 cities across 1 country, led by Horsens.
Workforce distribution model
Workforce hub outside company location
The largest visible workforce hub is Horsens, Central Denmark Region, Denmark, while the company location is Hedensted Jutland, Dk.
Workforce geography evidence confidence
Multi-location workforce geography evidence
Workforce geography spans 5 locations across 5 visible profile signals. Top workforce hub differs from company location.
Workforce seniority tiers
2
Seniority bands derived from visible profile titles and levels.
Seniority evidence confidence
Corroborated seniority evidence
Seniority graph spans 5 classified profile signals across 2 tiers, with reachable evidence for 1. Contributor-heavy visible sample.
Classified seniority profiles
5
Visible profiles with usable seniority signals.
Management-to-IC proxy
Contributor-heavy visible sample
0 managerial seniority signals and 5 contributor signals appear in the visible seniority-classified sample.
Role title diversity
Diverse role title sample
5 distinct role titles across 5 visible titled profiles.
Visible role titles
5
Distinct role titles found in visible profile signals.
Prospecting fit
Research-first prospecting fit
Nanolink shows research-first prospecting fit based on person-level contact coverage, technology workforce evidence, people graph depth, and peer context.
ICP fit
Qualified ICP fit
Nanolink matches the qualified ICP fit band for common outbound filters based on company size, market specificity, contactability, technology path, and domain trust.
Account research checklist
Multi-step account research checklist
Account research checklist combines person-level contact coverage, ICP fit, technology workforce evidence, related-company graph, domain trust, and people graph depth; raw contact values are hidden.
Intelligence signal groups
16
AeroLeads signal groups available for this company.

Market focus signals

Primary industry
Software Development
Market specificity
Focused market profile
10 market classification signals across categories, specialties, and related peer industries.
Market evidence tier
High-confidence market evidence
Market evidence combines 10 classification signals from categories, specialties, related peer industries, and description keywords. 6 description-backed keyword signals are included.
Industry benchmark
Peer-informed industry benchmark
Industry benchmark uses 9 related companies, 3 benchmark dimensions, and 3 peer evidence types from the AeroLeads related-company graph.
Top peer industry
Machinery Manufacturing
11% of 9 related peer industry signals.
Peer benchmark evidence
Multi-signal peer benchmark evidence
Peer benchmark combines 9 related companies with peer graph strength, size benchmark, and size position. Underlying peer graph includes 3 evidence types: employee benchmarks, website records, social profiles.
Size position
Larger than most related peers
7 of 7 related employee-estimated peers are lower.
Peer graph strength
Partial peer evidence graph
Related peer graph has employee benchmarks, website records, and social profiles across 9 related companies.
Benchmark dimensions: peer graph strength, size benchmark, and size position.
Categories
Software Development
Specialties
tracking of assets tracking of tools asset management tool management
Product-market keyword evidence
Description-backed market keywords
Keyword evidence comes from 3 source field groups: Category, Specialty, Description.
Product-market keyword evidence tier: High-confidence product-market keyword evidence. Product-market keyword evidence combines 11 unique market keywords, 3 source field groups, and 6 description-backed keywords (1 category, 4 specialty, and 6 description).
Software Development · Category tracking of assets · Specialty tracking of tools · Specialty asset management · Specialty tool management · Specialty automatic tracking · Description your equipment everything · Description additional manual operations · Description required find · Description pcs tablets smart · Description constantly sends · Description
Related peer industries
Peer-industry evidence tier: High-confidence peer-industry evidence. Peer-industry evidence combines 9 related companies, 5 peer-industry clusters, and top peer industry Machinery Manufacturing at 11.1%.
Machinery Manufacturing 1 peer
11.1% of related peer industries
Construction 1 peer
11.1% of related peer industries
Technology, Information and Internet 1 peer
11.1% of related peer industries
IT Services and IT Consulting 1 peer
11.1% of related peer industries
Consumer Services 1 peer
11.1% of related peer industries

Company signals

Company signal breadth
Multi-signal company record
Company-level signals include social audience, company maturity, and ownership.
Corroborated company record evidence: Company record evidence combines 3 source-backed company signal types: social audience, company maturity, and ownership.
Social audience
261
Followers in the company source record.
Social audience evidence tier: Limited social-audience evidence. Social audience evidence uses 261 followers from source field social_followers.
Audience density
Moderate audience density
261 followers against 12 employee estimate, about 21.80 followers per estimated employee.
Audience-density evidence tier: Limited audience-density evidence. Audience-density evidence combines 261 social followers, 12 employee estimate, and 21.80 followers per estimated employee.
Company maturity
Mature company record
Company source record includes founding year 2005, about 21 years before 2026.
Company maturity evidence tier: Long-running maturity evidence. Maturity evidence combines founding year 2005, 21 years of company history, and source field founded.
Company ownership
Public company record
Company source record includes source type Public Company.
Company ownership evidence tier: Structured ownership evidence. Ownership evidence combines source type Public Company from structured company source fields.

Workforce composition

Department concentration
Department-concentrated workforce
Most mapped workforce signals are in General. 75.0% of mapped department signals are in the largest department.
Department concentration evidence tier: Concentrated department evidence. Department concentration evidence combines 2 mapped departments, top department General, and 75.0% top-department share.
Department seniority map
Two-department leadership-depth map
Visible department samples map 4 seniority-classified profiles across 2 departments and 1 seniority band.
Department seniority evidence tier: Limited department seniority evidence. Department seniority evidence combines 4 seniority-classified profiles, 2 departments, 1 seniority band, and top cell General + Individual contributor with 3 profiles.
General 3 profiles
Individual contributor: 3
IT 1 profile
Individual contributor: 1
1 departments with visible contacts
General 3 signals
75.0% of mapped department signals, 1 visible contact
IT 1 signals
25.0% of mapped department signals

Technology talent signals

2 matched technology role signals.

Technology evidence tier
Mapped technology evidence
2 matched technology role signals found in the workforce graph.
1 IT department signals
Engineering 2 profiles
100.0% of matched technology role signals
Matched role examples
Lead Front-end Developer at Nanolink 1
System Developer at Nanolink Aps 1

Workforce seniority mix

Aggregated from 5 classified profile signals.

Largest seniority band
Individual contributor
4 of 5 classified profile signals, 1 with visible contact data.
Corroborated seniority evidence: Seniority graph spans 5 classified profile signals across 2 tiers, with reachable evidence for 1. Contributor-heavy visible sample.
Management-to-IC proxy
Contributor-heavy visible sample
0.0%
managerial seniority signals
100.0%
contributor seniority signals
0 managerial seniority signals and 5 contributor signals appear in the visible seniority-classified sample.
Management-shape evidence tier: Contributor-heavy management-shape evidence. Management-shape evidence combines 5 seniority-classified signals, 0 managerial signals, 0.0% managerial share, and 5 contributor signals.
Individual contributor 4 profiles
80.0% of classified seniority signals, 1 with visible contact data
Senior / Lead 1 profile
20.0% of classified seniority signals

Workforce geography

Aggregated from 5 visible profile location signals.

Workforce geography evidence
Multi-location workforce geography evidence
Workforce geography spans 5 locations across 5 visible profile signals. Top workforce hub differs from company location.
Distribution signal
Distributed workforce
Visible profile location signals are spread across 5 locations.
Workforce distribution model
Workforce hub outside company location
The largest visible workforce hub is Horsens, Central Denmark Region, Denmark, while the company location is Hedensted Jutland, Dk.
Corroborated workforce model evidence: Workforce model evidence combines 5 located profile signals, 5 workforce locations, 5 cities, 1 country, top hub Horsens, Central Denmark Region, Denmark at 20%, and company-location alignment.
Locations
5
Countries
1
Top hub share
20%
Workforce location footprint
Multi-city workforce footprint
Visible profile locations span 5 cities across 1 country, led by Horsens.
Cities
5
Countries
1
Company-location alignment
Top workforce hub differs from company location
The largest visible workforce location is Horsens, Central Denmark Region, Denmark, while the company location is Hedensted Jutland, Dk.
Top workforce hub share: 20.0%
Company-location evidence tier: Workforce-location divergence evidence. Company-location alignment evidence combines company location Hedensted Jutland, Dk, top workforce hub Horsens, Central Denmark Region, Denmark, 20.0% top workforce hub share, and location difference.
Horsens, Central Denmark Region, Denmark 1 profile
20.0% of visible location signals
Aarhus, Central Denmark Region, Denmark 1 profile
20.0% of visible location signals
Hedensted Municipality, Central Denmark Region, Denmark 1 profile
20.0% of visible location signals
Central Denmark Region, Denmark 1 profile
20.0% of visible location signals
Region of Southern Denmark, Denmark 1 profile
20.0% of visible location signals

Role and function mix

5 visible titled profiles across 5 distinct role titles.

Title mix
Diverse role title sample
5 distinct role titles across 5 visible titled profiles.
Role-title evidence tier: Diverse role-title evidence. Role-title diversity evidence combines 5 visible titled profiles, 5 distinct role titles, and top title It-konsulent Hos Nanolink Aps at 20.0%.
It-konsulent Hos Nanolink Aps 1 profile
20.0% of visible titled profiles
Konsulent Og Suporter 1 profile
20.0% of visible titled profiles
Lead Front-end Developer at Nanolink 1 profile
20.0% of visible titled profiles
Removing the Buzz in Iot 1 profile
20.0% of visible titled profiles
System Developer at Nanolink Aps 1 profile
20.0% of visible titled profiles

Contactability signals

Contactability score 25.0%
1 of 4 visible profiles include email or phone signals.
Contact channel mix
Multi-channel contact coverage
Visible profile or company source data includes email and phone channels.
Contact evidence tier
Mapped contact-channel evidence
Visible profile or company source data includes email and phone channels.
Contact data safety
Corroborated privacy-safe contact intelligence
AeroLeads exposes contact counts, channel mix, freshness, and domain-alignment evidence while hiding raw email addresses and masking phone numbers in public output.
Aggregate signals
4
Channel coverage
Email and phone aggregate coverage
Evidence groups
4
Corroborated contact-safety evidence: Contact-safety evidence combines visible profile contact sample, company email sample, support channels, and official-domain email evidence; public schema uses aggregate variables only.
Aggregate-only contact schema: Dataset variables use counts, rates, channel labels, freshness bands, and domain-alignment metrics instead of raw contact values.
Visible people
4
With contact data
1
Email coverage
1
25.0% of visible profiles
Company support channels
Email and phone
Company record includes support email and phone contact channels.
Support channel evidence tier: Dual-channel support evidence. Support evidence combines email and phone channels from the company record; raw contact values are hidden.
Company email sample
Limited company email sample
AeroLeads source data includes 1 email record across 1 domain; raw addresses are hidden. 1 match nanolink.com.
Source email evidence tier: Limited source email evidence. Source email evidence combines 1 unique source email record, 1 domain, 1 matching nanolink.com, and 100.0% official-domain rate.

Department contact samples

Focused department contact spread: Visible contact samples appear in 1 of 2 mapped departments.
Department contactability evidence tier: Limited department contactability evidence. Department contactability evidence combines 1 visible contact sample, 1 of 2 mapped departments, and 1 email signal; raw contacts are hidden.
Department Contacts Email Official email Phone
General 1 1 0 0

Explore related pages

Nanolink management graph and contactability signals

Related company intelligence:

AUTOMATIC TRACKING With Nanolink attached to your equipment, everything happens automatically. With Nanolink installed and registered, no additional manual operations or registrations are required. FIND NANOLINK WITH PCS, TABLETS & SMART PHONES Nanolink constantly sends a signal to the Nanolink app installed on your employees' smartphones. The app sends information on the time, GPS location and the closest smartphone to the Nanolink server. The Nanolink server provides an overview of all your equipment, where it is, who is in close proximity to it and the last person to be so. The Nanolink server can be accessed from PCs, tablets and smartphones.

Company source details

Employees
12
Founded
2005
Address
Hedensted Jutland, Dk
Phone signal
Phone signal available; raw number hidden
Email signal
Email signal available; raw address hidden
Industry
Software Development
NAICS
Software Publishers
Website
www.nanolink.com
Keywords
tracking of assets, tracking of tools, asset management, tool management.
HQ
Hedensted, Jutland
Related companies
Guangzhou R&M Machinery Co., Ltd., Tomley Projects, CodeOptimus, OnYourMap, One Stop Car Care, Guangzhou Zhongli Technology Co.,Ltd., Nanolink UK, Guangzhou Color Card Technology Co., Ltd., Klepios.
Explore visible people signals for Nanolink by role, title, or keyword.

1 of 4 visible profiles include email or phone signals in AeroLeads.

Nanolink Questions

Nanolink people graph sample