NPM

NPM Company Intelligence, Employees & Contact Signals

Contact coverage
Email-led
Visible profile or company source data includes email and phone channels. 1 visible profile includes direct contact evidence.
People graph depth
72 signals
Deep profile graph across 7 mapped departments.
Account research
6 steps
Account research checklist combines best covered outreach path, buying-committee coverage, ICP fit, technology workforce evidence, related-company graph, and domain trust; raw contact values are hidden.
Technology talent
1
Technology-oriented role signals in the workforce graph.
Evidence quality 100/100 Priority intelligence record

AeroLeads company intelligence

NPM workforce and contactability signals

Evidence from AeroLeads company records, matched professional profiles, and related company graph.

High confidence
Intelligence completeness
Strong intelligence record
8 of 11 major intelligence groups are available for this company.
Largest mapped team
IT
3 profile signals in IT.
Departments mapped
7
Workforce composition from AeroLeads profile data.
Profile graph
Deep profile graph
72 mapped workforce signals against a 207 employee size estimate.
Top reachable team
General
2 visible contact signals.
Top seniority band
Individual contributor
10 of 19 classified profile signals.
Visible contact sample
1
Displayed people with email or phone data.

Profile graph researchability

Visible people graph includes 19 visible people: 19 named, 19 titled, 19 located, and 7 contactable.

Multi-signal profile graph
Profile coverage evidence tier: Deep profile coverage evidence. Profile coverage evidence combines 72 mapped workforce signals, 207 employee size estimate, and 34.8% profile graph coverage.
High-confidence profile graph evidence: Researchability is based on 19 visible people with 4 populated evidence dimensions: named, titled, located, and contactable signals.
Profile association confidence: High-confidence profile association. Association confidence combines 19 titled profiles, 3 official-domain email profiles, 3 titled profiles with official-domain email, 3 located profiles with official-domain email, and 7 contactable profiles.
People
19
Named
19
Titled
19
Located
19
Contactable
7

Data methodology

AeroLeads renders only source-backed fields for this company page.

5 source groups
Company record Matched profile graph Email-pattern aggregate Related company graph Company signal fields
Blank source fields are omitted
Related companies are ordered deterministically
Structured data uses aggregate counts only

Intelligence completeness

8 of 11 major intelligence groups are available for this company.

8 / 11 groups
Strong intelligence record 72.7%
Workforce composition Contactability Email intelligence Decision makers Buying committee Technology talent Domain confidence Market and peer context

Evidence quality

This page clears the 60+ AeroLeads company-intelligence evidence threshold.

100 / 100
Priority intelligence record Threshold 60+
Workforce composition Employee email coverage Department contactability Department contactability heatmap Official-domain department contactability Department seniority map
Workforce graph
34 signals
Workforce composition, Department contactability, Department contactability heatmap
Contactability
16 signals
Employee email coverage, Multi-function contactability, Email pattern intelligence
Source trust
14 signals
Functional team estimates, Functional coverage gap, Domain confidence
Decision-maker intelligence
9 signals
Decision-maker coverage, Leadership signals, Department leadership coverage
Technology intelligence
1 signal
Technology talent
Market and peer context
13 signals
Related company graph, Peer graph strength, Peer position benchmark
Company momentum
3 signals
Company signal breadth, Company momentum score, Company ownership signal
84 additional source-backed evidence signals are counted in this page quality score.

Prospecting readiness

NPM shows strong prospecting fit based on person-level contact coverage, best covered outreach path, decision-maker coverage, and technology workforce evidence.

85 / 100
Strong prospecting fit High-confidence prospecting evidence

Prospecting evidence combines person-level contact coverage, best covered outreach path, decision-maker coverage, technology workforce evidence, and people graph depth; raw contact values are hidden.

ICP fit
Strong ICP fit

ICP fit combines company size, market specificity, contactability, buying committee, and technology path; raw contact values are hidden.

90 / 100
Company size
207 employees
Employee estimate is in a common outbound prospecting range.
Market specificity
Focused market profile
16 market classification signals across categories, specialties, and related peer industries.
Reachability
High-confidence contact evidence
4 current or verified professional email signals, 1 company-domain email signal, and multi-channel contact coverage; raw addresses and numbers are hidden.
Buying committee
Mapped buying committee
Mapped decision-maker signals span 2 business functions.
Technology path
Mapped technology evidence
1 matched technology role signal found in the workforce graph.
Account research checklist
Multi-step account research checklist

Account research checklist combines best covered outreach path, buying-committee coverage, ICP fit, technology workforce evidence, related-company graph, and domain trust; raw contact values are hidden.

6 steps
Confirm contact path
General + Manager
Outreach path evidence combines 2 visible General contact signals and 1 contactable Manager decision-maker signal; raw contacts are hidden.
Map reachable buying committee
Mapped buying committee
Buying-committee evidence combines 2 mapped buying-committee functions, 1 contactable function, and Marketing / growth and Executive / corporate function coverage.
Validate ICP fit
Strong ICP fit
ICP fit combines company size, market specificity, contactability, buying committee, and technology path; raw contact values are hidden.
Review technology path
Mapped technology evidence
1 matched technology role signal found in the workforce graph.
Compare related peers
Limited peer comparison
Compares this company with related-company evidence across employee scale and peer graph evidence.
Check domain trust
Corroborated domain alignment
Domain evidence combines website domain, social profile, employee email alignment, profile-domain association, and company email sample; raw email addresses are hidden.
Contact coverage
High-confidence contact evidence
4 current or verified professional email signals, 1 company-domain email signal, and multi-channel contact coverage; raw addresses and numbers are hidden.
Best outreach path
General + Manager
Coverage combines 2 visible General contact signals and 1 contactable Manager decision-maker signal.
Decision-maker coverage
Mapped buying committee
Mapped decision-maker signals span 2 business functions.
Technology contact path
Mapped technology evidence
1 matched technology role signal found in the workforce graph.

Domain trust signals

Domain confidence for npm.works is based on website domain, social profile, employee email alignment, profile-domain association, and company email sample.

90 / 100
Corroborated domain alignment Corroborated domain evidence

Domain evidence combines website domain, social profile, employee email alignment, profile-domain association, and company email sample; raw email addresses are hidden.

Website domain
npm.works
The official website domain is available from the company source record.
Social profile
LinkedIn organization page
A LinkedIn organization page is present for this company record.
Employee email alignment
4 official-domain email signals
44% of visible employee email signals match npm.works; raw addresses are hidden.
Profile-domain association
3 people with official-domain email
Matched people include official-domain email evidence; raw addresses are hidden.
Company email sample
1 official-domain source email records
Company-level email source records include official-domain coverage; raw addresses are hidden.
Support email domain differs: The support email channel uses a non-official domain.

AeroLeads coverage snapshot

Profile sample
2
Visible people attached to this company page.
Profile graph depth
Deep profile graph
72 mapped workforce signals against a 207 employee size estimate.
Contactable sample
1
Visible people with email or phone data.
Contact channel mix
Multi-channel contact coverage
Visible profile or company source data includes email and phone channels.
Contact evidence confidence
High-confidence contact evidence
4 current or verified professional email signals, 1 company-domain email signal, and multi-channel contact coverage; raw addresses and numbers are hidden.
Company support channels
Email and phone
Company record includes support email and phone contact channels.
Department coverage
7
Departments represented in AeroLeads workforce signals.
Department concentration
Department-concentrated workforce
Most mapped workforce signals are in General.
Leadership signals
8
Department lead or leadership signals in the org data.
Department leader sample
Department leader sample
AeroLeads source data includes 6 leadership signals across 3 departments; rows show titles and contact-channel presence only.
Department leadership coverage
Focused department leadership coverage
Leadership signals appear in 3 of 7 mapped departments.
Leadership density
11.10
Percent of mapped department signals that are leadership signals.
Department contact coverage
4
Departments with visible contact samples.
Department contact spread
Focused department contact spread
Visible contact samples appear in 4 of 7 mapped departments.
Department contactability heatmap
Email-led department contact map
Department samples show 6 email signals and 0 phone signals across 4 contactable departments.
Official-domain department contactability
Multi-department official-domain coverage
2 of 7 mapped departments include visible company-domain email signals.
Department seniority map
Multi-department seniority map
Visible department samples map 17 seniority-classified profiles across 7 departments and 5 seniority bands.
Technology talent
1
Visible profiles matching technology role patterns.
Technology evidence confidence
Mapped technology evidence
1 matched technology role signal found in the workforce graph.
Technology department signals
3
Mapped department profile signals in technology-oriented teams.
Email-pattern variants
2
Distinct matched business email patterns.
Official-domain emails
4
Email signals matching npm.works.
Email domain confidence
Mixed-domain coverage
Visible email signals include official-domain and non-official domains.
Domain confidence
Corroborated domain alignment
Domain confidence for npm.works is based on website domain, social profile, employee email alignment, profile-domain association, and company email sample.
Email usability mix
Current email coverage sample
AeroLeads source data includes 9 unique visible email signals; 4 are marked current or verified and 4 are professional-type. Raw addresses are hidden.
Contact data safety
Strong privacy-safe contact intelligence
AeroLeads exposes contact counts, channel mix, freshness, and domain-alignment evidence while hiding raw email addresses and masking phone numbers in public output.
Company signal breadth
Multi-signal company record
Company-level signals include social audience, company maturity, and ownership.
Company momentum score
Limited company momentum score
Momentum score blends contactability and peer position from AeroLeads company and profile evidence.
Company ownership signal
Private company record
Company source record includes source type Privately Held.
Audience density
Low audience density
1.70K followers against 207 employee estimate, about 8.20 followers per estimated employee.
Specialty signals
10
Specialty tags in the company record.
Market specificity
Focused market profile
16 market classification signals across categories, specialties, and related peer industries.
Peer industry clusters
8
Industries represented by related company records.
Related companies
10
Company graph links available for comparison.
Industry benchmark
Peer-informed industry benchmark
Industry benchmark uses 10 related companies, 3 benchmark dimensions, and 3 peer evidence types from the AeroLeads related-company graph.
Peer benchmark confidence
Multi-signal peer benchmark evidence
Peer benchmark combines 10 related companies with peer graph strength, size benchmark, and size position. Underlying peer graph includes 3 evidence types: employee benchmarks, website records, social profiles.
Peer position benchmark
Employee-scale peer position benchmark
Peer-position benchmark shows employee scale above 70% of 10 comparable related peers.
Peer comparison matrix
Limited peer comparison
Compares this company with related-company evidence across employee scale and peer graph evidence.
Workforce locations
16
Locations represented in visible profile signals.
Workforce distribution
Distributed workforce
Visible profile location signals are spread across 16 locations.
Workforce location footprint
Multi-country workforce footprint
Visible profile locations span 16 cities across 7 countries, led by Lahore District.
Workforce distribution model
International distributed workforce model
Visible profile locations span 7 countries and 16 workforce locations; no single hub exceeds 10% of visible location signals.
Workforce geography evidence confidence
High-confidence workforce geography evidence
Workforce geography spans 16 locations across 19 visible profile signals, with reachable evidence across 6 locations and company-domain evidence across 2 locations. Top workforce hub differs from company location.
Contactable workforce locations
6
Workforce locations represented by visible contact samples.
Top contactable workforce location
Tucson, Arizona, United States
Visible contact samples span 6 workforce locations, led by Tucson, Arizona, United States.
Workforce seniority tiers
5
Seniority bands derived from visible profile titles and levels.
Seniority evidence confidence
High-confidence seniority evidence
Seniority graph spans 19 classified profile signals across 5 tiers, with reachable evidence for 7 and company-domain evidence for 3. Contributor-heavy visible sample.
Classified seniority profiles
19
Visible profiles with usable seniority signals.
Official-domain seniority profiles
Multi-profile official-domain seniority evidence
3 seniority-classified profiles across 2 tiers include company-domain email signals.
Management-to-IC proxy
Contributor-heavy visible sample
7 managerial seniority signals and 12 contributor signals appear in the visible seniority-classified sample.
Role title diversity
Diverse role title sample
19 distinct role titles across 19 visible titled profiles.
Visible role titles
19
Distinct role titles found in visible profile signals.
Business function mix
Broad business-function workforce sample
AeroLeads maps 6 visible profile signals into 4 business functions; 3 include visible contact data.
Mapped business functions
4
Business functions inferred from visible profile titles and departments.
Functional team estimates
Revenue and engineering team estimates
AeroLeads derives 2 visible revenue team profile signals and 2 visible engineering team profile signals from mapped business-function signals.
Functional coverage gaps
Partial function coverage map
Visible people signals cover 3 of 8 core business functions. Not observed in the visible graph: Sales / revenue, Product / design, People / HR, and Operations. Treat this as a coverage gap, not confirmed absence.
Contactable role titles
7
Distinct role titles with visible contact samples.
Contactable role coverage
Diverse contactable role coverage
7 reachable role titles across 7 contactable titled profiles.
Decision-maker signals
7
Visible profiles matching seniority or leadership title patterns.
Decision-maker reachability
Partial decision-maker reachability
Some mapped decision-maker signals include visible contact data.
Buying committee evidence confidence
Mapped buying committee
Mapped decision-maker signals span 2 business functions.
Buyer persona availability
Dual-persona buyer availability
Mapped decision-maker evidence covers Marketing buyer and Executive buyer; 1 of 2 buyer personas include visible contact data.
Decision-maker contactability rate
28.60
Percent of mapped decision-maker signals with visible contact data.
Best covered outreach path
General + Manager
Coverage combines 2 visible General contact signals and 1 contactable Manager decision-maker signal.
Prospecting fit
Strong prospecting fit
NPM shows strong prospecting fit based on person-level contact coverage, best covered outreach path, decision-maker coverage, and technology workforce evidence.
ICP fit
Strong ICP fit
NPM matches the strong ICP fit band for common outbound filters based on company size, market specificity, contactability, buying committee, and technology path.
Account research checklist
Multi-step account research checklist
Account research checklist combines best covered outreach path, buying-committee coverage, ICP fit, technology workforce evidence, related-company graph, and domain trust; raw contact values are hidden.
Intelligence signal groups
26
AeroLeads signal groups available for this company.

Market focus signals

Primary industry
Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering
Market specificity
Focused market profile
16 market classification signals across categories, specialties, and related peer industries.
Market evidence tier
High-confidence market evidence
Market evidence combines 16 classification signals from categories, specialties, related peer industries, and description keywords. 6 description-backed keyword signals are included.
Industry benchmark
Peer-informed industry benchmark
Industry benchmark uses 10 related companies, 3 benchmark dimensions, and 3 peer evidence types from the AeroLeads related-company graph.
Top peer industry
Oil and Gas
30% of 10 related peer industry signals.
Peer benchmark evidence
Multi-signal peer benchmark evidence
Peer benchmark combines 10 related companies with peer graph strength, size benchmark, and size position. Underlying peer graph includes 3 evidence types: employee benchmarks, website records, social profiles.
Size position
Larger than most related peers
7 of 10 related employee-estimated peers are lower.
Peer graph strength
Partial peer evidence graph
Related peer graph has employee benchmarks, website records, and social profiles across 10 related companies.
Benchmark dimensions: peer graph strength, size benchmark, and size position.
Categories
Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering
Specialties
Engineering Design Project Management Field Services Project Consultancy OSP Projects Procurement Asset Evaluation Rental Resources
Product-market keyword evidence
Description-backed market keywords
Keyword evidence comes from 3 source field groups: Category, Specialty, Description.
Product-market keyword evidence tier: High-confidence product-market keyword evidence. Product-market keyword evidence combines 17 unique market keywords, 3 source field groups, and 6 description-backed keywords (1 category, 10 specialty, and 6 description).
Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering · Category Engineering Design · Specialty Project Management · Specialty Field Services · Specialty Project Consultancy · Specialty OSP Projects · Specialty Procurement · Specialty Asset Evaluation · Specialty Rental Resources · Specialty Maintenance · Specialty Upgradation · Specialty was founded · Description
Related peer industries
Peer-industry evidence tier: High-confidence peer-industry evidence. Peer-industry evidence combines 10 related companies, 5 peer-industry clusters, and top peer industry Oil and Gas at 30.0%.
Functional coverage gaps
Partial function coverage map
Visible people signals cover 3 of 8 core business functions. Not observed in the visible graph: Sales / revenue, Product / design, People / HR, and Operations. Treat this as a coverage gap, not confirmed absence.
Transparent function coverage evidence: Function coverage evidence combines observed functions Marketing / growth, Technology / data, and Finance and 5 unobserved core functions in the visible graph.
Oil and Gas 3 peers
30.0% of related peer industries
Facilities Services 1 peer
10.0% of related peer industries
Food and Beverage Services 1 peer
10.0% of related peer industries
Building Materials 1 peer
10.0% of related peer industries
Business Consulting and Services 1 peer
10.0% of related peer industries

Company signals

Company signal breadth
Multi-signal company record
Company-level signals include social audience, company maturity, and ownership.
Corroborated company record evidence: Company record evidence combines 3 source-backed company signal types: social audience, company maturity, and ownership.
Social audience
1.70K
Followers in the company source record.
Social audience evidence tier: Limited social-audience evidence. Social audience evidence uses 1.70K followers from source field social_followers.
Audience density
Low audience density
1.70K followers against 207 employee estimate, about 8.20 followers per estimated employee.
Audience-density evidence tier: Corroborated audience-density evidence. Audience-density evidence combines 1.70K social followers, 207 employee estimate, and 8.20 followers per estimated employee.
Company maturity
Mature company record
Company source record includes founding year 1989, about 37 years before 2026.
Company maturity evidence tier: Long-running maturity evidence. Maturity evidence combines founding year 1989, 37 years of company history, and source field founded.
Company ownership
Private company record
Company source record includes source type Privately Held.
Company ownership evidence tier: Structured ownership evidence. Ownership evidence combines source type Privately Held from structured company source fields.

Workforce composition

Department concentration
Department-concentrated workforce
Most mapped workforce signals are in General. 83.3% of mapped department signals are in the largest department.
Department concentration evidence tier: Concentrated department evidence. Department concentration evidence combines 7 mapped departments, top department General, and 83.3% top-department share.
Department leadership coverage
Focused department leadership coverage
Leadership signals appear in 3 of 7 mapped departments. Leadership signals represent 11.1% of mapped department signals.
Department leadership evidence tier: Corroborated department leadership evidence. Department leadership evidence combines 8 leadership signals, 3 of 7 mapped departments, and 11.1% leadership density.
Department seniority map
Multi-department seniority map
Visible department samples map 17 seniority-classified profiles across 7 departments and 5 seniority bands.
Department seniority evidence tier: High-confidence department seniority evidence. Department seniority evidence combines 17 seniority-classified profiles, 7 departments, 5 seniority bands, and top cell General + Manager with 3 profiles.
General 7 profiles
Manager: 3 Individual contributor: 3 Associate / junior: 1
Healthcare 3 profiles
Individual contributor: 2 Associate / junior: 1
Executive 2 profiles
Executive: 1 Director: 1
Sales 2 profiles
Individual contributor: 2
Finance 1 profile
Individual contributor: 1
IT 1 profile
Individual contributor: 1
8 leadership signals 4 departments with visible contacts
Department leader sample
Department leader sample
1 contactable

AeroLeads source data includes 6 leadership signals across 3 departments; rows show titles and contact-channel presence only.

Department leader evidence tier: Corroborated department leader evidence. Department leader evidence combines 6 leadership signals, 3 departments, and 1 contactable; raw contacts are hidden.
Leader Department Seniority Channel
Noman Mart
Marketing Manager at Npm
Marketing Manager Email
Kh Usman
Director at Npm
Executive Director No visible contact channel
Muhammad Anwar
Manager at Npm
General Manager No visible contact channel
Vijay Kumar
General Manager at Npm
General Manager No visible contact channel
farhan imtiaz
Import Manager at Npm
General Manager No visible contact channel
Moshe Npm
CEO at Npm
Executive Executive No visible contact channel
General 60 signals
83.3% of mapped department signals, 5 leadership signals, 2 visible contacts
IT 3 signals
4.2% of mapped department signals
Healthcare 3 signals
4.2% of mapped department signals, 2 visible contacts
Executive 2 signals
2.8% of mapped department signals, 2 leadership signals
Sales 2 signals
2.8% of mapped department signals
Marketing 1 signals
1.4% of mapped department signals, 1 leadership signals, 1 visible contact
Finance 1 signals
1.4% of mapped department signals, 1 visible contact

Technology talent signals

1 matched technology role signals.

Technology evidence tier
Mapped technology evidence
1 matched technology role signal found in the workforce graph.
3 IT department signals
Security 1 profile
100.0% of matched technology role signals
Matched role examples
Security Presso Npm 1

Workforce seniority mix

Aggregated from 19 classified profile signals.

Largest seniority band
Individual contributor
10 of 19 classified profile signals, 3 with visible contact data, 2 official-domain.
Multi-profile official-domain seniority evidence: 3 seniority-classified profiles across 2 tiers include company-domain email signals.
High-confidence seniority evidence: Seniority graph spans 19 classified profile signals across 5 tiers, with reachable evidence for 7 and company-domain evidence for 3. Contributor-heavy visible sample.
Management-to-IC proxy
Contributor-heavy visible sample
36.8%
managerial seniority signals
63.2%
contributor seniority signals
7 managerial seniority signals and 12 contributor signals appear in the visible seniority-classified sample.
Management-shape evidence tier: Contributor-heavy management-shape evidence. Management-shape evidence combines 19 seniority-classified signals, 7 managerial signals, 36.8% managerial share, and 12 contributor signals.
Individual contributor 10 profiles
52.6% of classified seniority signals, 3 with visible contact data, 2 official-domain
Manager 4 profiles
21.1% of classified seniority signals, 1 with visible contact data
Director 2 profiles
10.5% of classified seniority signals, 1 with visible contact data
Associate / junior 2 profiles
10.5% of classified seniority signals, 2 with visible contact data, 1 official-domain
Executive 1 profile
5.3% of classified seniority signals

Workforce geography

Aggregated from 19 visible profile location signals.

Workforce geography evidence
High-confidence workforce geography evidence
Workforce geography spans 16 locations across 19 visible profile signals, with reachable evidence across 6 locations and company-domain evidence across 2 locations. Top workforce hub differs from company location.
Distribution signal
Distributed workforce
Visible profile location signals are spread across 16 locations.
Workforce distribution model
International distributed workforce model
Visible profile locations span 7 countries and 16 workforce locations; no single hub exceeds 10% of visible location signals.
High-confidence workforce model evidence: Workforce model evidence combines 19 located profile signals, 16 workforce locations, 16 cities, 7 countries, top hub Lahore District, Punjab, Pakistan at 10%, company-location alignment, 6 reachable locations, and 2 company-domain locations.
Locations
16
Countries
7
Top hub share
10%
Workforce location footprint
Multi-country workforce footprint
Visible profile locations span 16 cities across 7 countries, led by Lahore District.
Cities
16
Countries
7
Company-location alignment
Top workforce hub differs from company location
The largest visible workforce location is Lahore District, Punjab, Pakistan, while the company location is Dubai, Dubayy, United Arab Emirates.
Top workforce hub share: 10.5%
Company-location evidence tier: Workforce-location divergence evidence. Company-location alignment evidence combines company location Dubai, Dubayy, United Arab Emirates, top workforce hub Lahore District, Punjab, Pakistan, 10.5% top workforce hub share, and location difference.
Contactable location spread
Multi-location contact coverage
Visible contact samples span 6 workforce locations, led by Tucson, Arizona, United States.
Contactable location evidence tier: High-confidence contactable location evidence. Contactable location evidence combines 7 contactable profile location signals, 6 workforce locations, top contactable hub Tucson, Arizona, United States at 28.6%, and company-location alignment.
Contactable workforce hub differs from company location: The largest contactable workforce location is Tucson, Arizona, United States, while the company location is Dubai, Dubayy, United Arab Emirates. Top contactable hub share: 28.6%.
Tucson, Arizona, United States 2 contacts
28.6% of contactable location signals
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada 1 contact
14.3% of contactable location signals
Seattle, Washington, United States 1 contact
14.3% of contactable location signals
Round Rock, Texas, United States 1 contact
14.3% of contactable location signals
Pakistan 1 contact
14.3% of contactable location signals
Official-domain location spread
Multi-location official-domain workforce
Company-domain email profile locations span 2 workforce locations, led by Tucson, Arizona, United States.
3 profiles with npm.works email evidence include location signals.
Official-domain location evidence tier: High-confidence official-domain location evidence. Official-domain location evidence combines 3 official-domain profile location signals, 2 workforce locations, top official-domain hub Tucson, Arizona, United States at 66.7%, and company-location alignment.
Official-domain workforce hub differs from company location: The largest company-domain email workforce location is Tucson, Arizona, United States, while the company location is Dubai, Dubayy, United Arab Emirates. Top official-domain hub share: 66.7%.
Tucson, Arizona, United States 2 profiles
66.7% of official-domain location signals
Round Rock, Texas, United States 1 profile
33.3% of official-domain location signals
Lahore District, Punjab, Pakistan 2 profiles
10.5% of visible location signals
Tucson, Arizona, United States 2 profiles
10.5% of visible location signals
Pakistan 2 profiles
10.5% of visible location signals
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada 1 profile
5.3% of visible location signals
Hyderabad, Telangana, India 1 profile
5.3% of visible location signals
United Arab Emirates 1 profile
5.3% of visible location signals

Decision-maker coverage

7 seniority signals, 2 with visible contact data.

Decision-maker evidence tier
Corroborated decision-maker evidence
Decision-maker evidence covers 7 seniority signals, 2 reachable. Buying committee spans 2 functions.
Account planning snapshot
Multi-signal account planning snapshot
Snapshot combines department reachability, decision-maker coverage, and buying-committee function aggregates.
4 account-planning evidence cards available.
Account planning evidence tier: Multi-source account planning evidence. Account planning evidence combines 4 aggregate account-planning cards, best covered outreach path, 1 reachable buying-committee function, Manager seniority reachability, and General department contactability; raw contacts are hidden.
Best covered path
General + Manager
Coverage combines 2 visible General contact signals and 1 contactable Manager decision-maker signal.
Reachable buying committee
1 of 2 functions
Reachable functions include Marketing / growth.
Most reachable seniority
Manager
1 of 4 signals in this seniority band include visible contact data.
Top reachable team
General
2 visible contact signals in this department sample.
Partial decision-maker reachability 28.6%
Some mapped decision-maker signals include visible contact data.
Decision-maker reachability evidence tier: Partial decision-maker reachability evidence. Decision-maker reachability evidence combines 2 contactable decision-maker signals, 7 mapped decision-maker signals, and 28.6% contactability.
Email-led decision-maker coverage: Mapped decision-maker contact data is strongest for email, with 2 email signals.
Buying committee function coverage
Multi-function buying-committee coverage
1 of 2 mapped functions include visible decision-maker contact data.
Mapped buying committee: Mapped decision-maker signals span 2 business functions.
Buying committee evidence tier: Mapped buying-committee evidence. Buying-committee evidence combines 2 mapped buying-committee functions, 1 contactable function, and Marketing / growth and Executive / corporate function coverage.
Buyer persona availability: Dual-persona buyer availability. Mapped decision-maker evidence covers Marketing buyer and Executive buyer; 1 of 2 buyer personas include visible contact data. Reachable buyer persona evidence: Buyer persona evidence combines 2 mapped buyer personas, 1 contactable persona, and Marketing buyer and Executive buyer coverage.
Marketing / growth: 2 contactable Executive / corporate
Most reachable seniority
Manager
1 of 4 seniority signals include visible contact data.
Seniority reachability evidence tier: Mapped seniority reachability evidence. Seniority reachability evidence combines 1 contactable Manager signal, 4 Manager signals, 25.0% tier contactability, and email coverage.
Manager 4 profiles
57.1% of mapped seniority signals, 1 with visible contact data
Director 2 profiles
28.6% of mapped seniority signals, 1 with visible contact data
Executive 1 profile
14.3% of mapped seniority signals

Role and function mix

19 visible titled profiles across 19 distinct role titles.

Title mix
Diverse role title sample
19 distinct role titles across 19 visible titled profiles.
Role-title evidence tier: Diverse role-title evidence. Role-title diversity evidence combines 19 visible titled profiles, 19 distinct role titles, and top title Account Department at Npm at 5.3%.
Business function mix
Broad business-function workforce sample
AeroLeads maps 6 visible profile signals into 4 business functions; 3 include visible contact data.
Business-function evidence tier: Corroborated business-function evidence. Business-function evidence combines 6 mapped function profile signals, 4 business functions, 3 contactable signals, 2 contactable functions, and top function Marketing / growth at 33.3%.
Multi-function contactability map 2 / 4 functions
2 of 4 mapped business functions include visible contact data.
Functional team estimates
Revenue and engineering team estimates
AeroLeads derives 2 visible revenue team profile signals and 2 visible engineering team profile signals from mapped business-function signals.
Corroborated functional team evidence: Functional team estimate evidence combines 2 visible revenue team profile signals and 2 visible engineering team profile signals.
Revenue team estimate 2 profiles
33.3% of mapped function signals, 2 with visible contact data; Marketing / growth
Engineering team estimate 2 profiles
33.3% of mapped function signals; Technology / data
Marketing / growth 2 profiles
33.3% of mapped function signals, 2 with visible contact data
Technology / data 2 profiles
33.3% of mapped function signals
Executive / corporate 1 profile
16.7% of mapped function signals
Finance 1 profile
16.7% of mapped function signals, 1 with visible contact data
Contactable role coverage
Diverse contactable role coverage
7 reachable role titles across 7 contactable titled profiles.
Contactable role evidence tier: Diverse contactable role evidence. Contactable role evidence combines 7 contactable titled profiles, 7 reachable role titles, and top reachable role Controller Finance at Npm at 14.3%.
Role title reachability
Broad role-title reachability
7 of 19 distinct visible role titles include email or phone signals.
Role-title reachability evidence tier: Corroborated role-title reachability evidence. Role-title reachability evidence combines 19 visible role titles, 7 reachable titles, 36.8% title reachability, and 3 official-domain titles.
Multi-title official-domain reachability 3 / 19 titles
3 of 19 distinct visible role titles include email signals matching npm.works.
Account Department at Npm 1 profile
5.3% of visible titled profiles
Account at Npm 1 profile
5.3% of visible titled profiles
CEO at Npm 1 profile
5.3% of visible titled profiles
Controller Finance at Npm 1 profile
5.3% of visible titled profiles
Coordinator at Npm 1 profile
5.3% of visible titled profiles
Director at Npm 1 profile
5.3% of visible titled profiles

Contactability signals

Contactability score 50.0%
1 of 2 visible profiles include email or phone signals.
Contact channel mix
Multi-channel contact coverage
Visible profile or company source data includes email and phone channels.
Contact evidence tier
High-confidence contact evidence
4 current or verified professional email signals, 1 company-domain email signal, and multi-channel contact coverage; raw addresses and numbers are hidden.
Contact data safety
Strong privacy-safe contact intelligence
AeroLeads exposes contact counts, channel mix, freshness, and domain-alignment evidence while hiding raw email addresses and masking phone numbers in public output.
Aggregate signals
4
Channel coverage
Email and phone aggregate coverage
Evidence groups
5
High-confidence contact-safety evidence: Contact-safety evidence combines visible profile contact sample, company email sample, support channels, current email metadata, and official-domain email evidence; public schema uses aggregate variables only.
Aggregate-only contact schema: Dataset variables use counts, rates, channel labels, freshness bands, and domain-alignment metrics instead of raw contact values.
Best covered outreach path
General + Manager
Coverage combines 2 visible General contact signals and 1 contactable Manager decision-maker signal.
Outreach path evidence tier: Corroborated outreach path evidence. Outreach path evidence combines 2 visible General contact signals and 1 contactable Manager decision-maker signal; raw contacts are hidden.
Email usability mix
Current email coverage sample
AeroLeads source data includes 9 unique visible email signals; 4 are marked current or verified and 4 are professional-type. Raw addresses are hidden.
Email usability evidence tier: High-confidence email usability evidence. Email usability evidence combines 9 unique email signals, 4 current or verified, 4 professional-type, and 44.4% current signal rate; raw addresses are hidden.
4 current or verified 4 professional-type 44.4% current signal rate
Visible people
2
With contact data
1
Email coverage
1
50.0% of visible profiles
Company support channels
Email and phone
Company record includes support email and phone contact channels.
Support channel evidence tier: Dual-channel support evidence. Support evidence combines email and phone channels from the company record; raw contact values are hidden.
Company email sample
Limited company email sample
AeroLeads source data includes 1 email record across 1 domain; raw addresses are hidden. 1 match npm.works.
Source email evidence tier: Limited source email evidence. Source email evidence combines 1 unique source email record, 1 domain, 1 matching npm.works, and 100.0% official-domain rate.

Email domain intelligence

4 of 9 visible email signals match npm.works.

Mixed-domain coverage: Visible email signals include official-domain and non-official domains.
Email identity evidence tier: Corroborated email identity evidence. Email identity evidence combines 9 visible email signals, 4 matching npm.works, 3 people with official-domain email, 44.4% official-domain match, and 5 personal-domain signals.
44.4% domain match 3 people with official-domain email 5 non-official email signals

Department contact samples

Focused department contact spread: Visible contact samples appear in 4 of 7 mapped departments.
Department contactability evidence tier: Corroborated department contactability evidence. Department contactability evidence combines 6 visible contact samples, 4 of 7 mapped departments, 6 email signals, and 3 official-domain email signals; raw contacts are hidden.
Contactability heatmap
Email-led department contact map
Department samples show 6 email signals and 0 phone signals across 4 contactable departments.
General Email
Email2
Phone0
Healthcare Email
Email2
Phone0
Marketing Email
Email1
Phone0
Finance Email
Email1
Phone0
Official-domain department coverage
Multi-department official-domain coverage
2 of 7 mapped departments include visible company-domain email signals.
Department Contacts Email Official email Phone
General 2 2 1 0
Healthcare 2 2 2 0
Marketing 1 1 0 0
Finance 1 1 0 0
Top email pattern: first at 90.0% of matched patterns.
Format example: [first]@npm.works
Dominant pattern: One email pattern accounts for most matched examples.
Email pattern evidence tier: High-confidence email pattern evidence. Email pattern evidence combines 2 matched patterns, 90.0% top-pattern share, format example for npm.works, and secondary pattern variants.
first 90.0%
first.last 10.0%
1 of 2 visible NPM profiles include email or phone signals. Review people graph
The strongest NPM email pattern signal is [first] , representing 90.0% of matched email-pattern evidence in the AeroLeads company graph.
Other observed email-pattern signals for NPM are [first].[last] .
In total, AeroLeads has detected 2 aggregate email-pattern signals for NPM. View the detailed email format page .

NPM Email Pattern Intelligence Snapshot

These aggregate patterns support the company intelligence page. The dedicated email-format workflow lives on NPM email format .

Observed pattern
Example pattern
[first]
[first]@npm.works
90%
[first].[last]
[first].[last]@npm.works
10%

NPM Questions

News

S1ngularity/nx attackers strike again - Aikido Security

S1ngularity/nx attackers strike again Aikido Security

NPM head says treasured works curated to resonate with Czech audiences - Focus Taiwan

NPM head says treasured works curated to resonate with Czech audiences Focus Taiwan

A year of improving Node.js compatibility in Cloudflare Workers - The Cloudflare Blog

A year of improving Node.js compatibility in Cloudflare Workers The Cloudflare Blog

Package lurking in npm for six years waits to destroy your work - Developer Tech News

Package lurking in npm for six years waits to destroy your work Developer Tech News

8 Types of Node.js Apps You Can Build in 2025 - Netguru

8 Types of Node.js Apps You Can Build in 2025 Netguru

dApps, Wallets on High Alert After Massive Supply-Chain Attack - DailyCoin

dApps, Wallets on High Alert After Massive Supply-Chain Attack DailyCoin

Installing Multiple Versions of Node.js Using nvm - SitePoint

Installing Multiple Versions of Node.js Using nvm SitePoint

Ruby on Rails vs Node.js: A Comparison of Frameworks for Web Development in 2025 - Netguru

Ruby on Rails vs Node.js: A Comparison of Frameworks for Web Development in 2025 Netguru

How to Install npm, Master npm Commands & Use Packages - SitePoint

How to Install npm, Master npm Commands & Use Packages SitePoint

Breakdown: Widespread npm Supply Chain Attack Puts Billions of Weekly Downloads at Risk - Palo Alto Networks

Breakdown: Widespread npm Supply Chain Attack Puts Billions of Weekly Downloads at Risk Palo Alto Networks

National Palace Museum treasures to make debut in Czech Republic - Focus Taiwan

National Palace Museum treasures to make debut in Czech Republic Focus Taiwan

Node.js rival Deno adds stable npm compatibility in effort to bridge module system divide - devclass

Node.js rival Deno adds stable npm compatibility in effort to bridge module system divide devclass

Create a React Hello World program - TheServerSide

Create a React Hello World program TheServerSide

Self-propagating worm fuels latest npm supply chain compromise - theregister.com

Self-propagating worm fuels latest npm supply chain compromise theregister.com

More NPM packages on Cloudflare Workers: Combining polyfills and native code to support Node.js APIs - The Cloudflare Blog

More NPM packages on Cloudflare Workers: Combining polyfills and native code to support Node.js APIs The Cloudflare Blog

npm debug and chalk packages compromised - Aikido Security

npm debug and chalk packages compromised Aikido Security

A Guide to Using MSSQL with Node.js - SitePoint

A Guide to Using MSSQL with Node.js SitePoint

Bringing Node.js HTTP servers to Cloudflare Workers - The Cloudflare Blog

Bringing Node.js HTTP servers to Cloudflare Workers The Cloudflare Blog

NPX vs NPM in a nutshell - InApps Technology

NPX vs NPM in a nutshell InApps Technology

Using Redis with Node.js - SitePoint

Using Redis with Node.js SitePoint

How do you work with SCSS/SASS and node_modules folders in source? - SitePoint

How do you work with SCSS/SASS and node_modules folders in source? SitePoint

A Socket API that works across JavaScript runtimes — announcing a WinterCG spec and Node.js implementation of connect() - The Cloudflare Blog

A Socket API that works across JavaScript runtimes — announcing a WinterCG spec and Node.js implementation of connect() The Cloudflare Blog

How do I run a program (npm) to run, when I click on the html? - SitePoint

How do I run a program (npm) to run, when I click on the html? SitePoint

Bringing npm registry services to GitHub Codespaces - The GitHub Blog

Bringing npm registry services to GitHub Codespaces The GitHub Blog

The Best of "npm install -g" - Hackernoon

The Best of "npm install -g" Hackernoon

How to Use Node.js with Docker - SitePoint

How to Use Node.js with Docker SitePoint

Critical Bug Reported in NPM Package With Millions of Downloads Weekly - The Hacker News

Critical Bug Reported in NPM Package With Millions of Downloads Weekly The Hacker News

Crypto Users Warned to Stop Transacting as Massive Exploit Threatens Apps and Wallets - Yahoo Finance

Crypto Users Warned to Stop Transacting as Massive Exploit Threatens Apps and Wallets Yahoo Finance

10 Must-have VS Code Extensions for JavaScript Developers - SitePoint

10 Must-have VS Code Extensions for JavaScript Developers SitePoint

🚀 fnm: Fast and Simple Node.js Version Manager - Hackernoon

🚀 fnm: Fast and Simple Node.js Version Manager Hackernoon

Popular NPM Libraries Developer Intentionally Sabotaged His Work in Political Statement - Bitdefender

Popular NPM Libraries Developer Intentionally Sabotaged His Work in Political Statement Bitdefender

Archdiocesan music director explores power of sacred music. Published Aug. 18 2023. Local. - The Boston Pilot

Archdiocesan music director explores power of sacred music. Published Aug. 18 2023. Local. The Boston Pilot

Nasdaq Private Market: Why Employees Are Increasingly Selling Private Stock Ahead of Traditional Exits - USA Today

Nasdaq Private Market: Why Employees Are Increasingly Selling Private Stock Ahead of Traditional Exits USA Today

Node.js for Beginners: How to Get Started - Simplilearn.com

Node.js for Beginners: How to Get Started Simplilearn.com

MERN Stack Explained: A Beginner's Guide [2025] - Simplilearn.com

MERN Stack Explained: A Beginner's Guide [2025] Simplilearn.com

Yarn: A new package manager for JavaScript - Engineering at Meta Blog

Yarn: A new package manager for JavaScript Engineering at Meta Blog

A Community Group for Web-interoperable JavaScript runtimes - The Cloudflare Blog

A Community Group for Web-interoperable JavaScript runtimes The Cloudflare Blog

Blockbuster Met masterpieces exhibition opens at NPM - Focus Taiwan

Blockbuster Met masterpieces exhibition opens at NPM Focus Taiwan

17 Most Helpful Node.JS Open Source Projects According to Experts - Netguru

17 Most Helpful Node.JS Open Source Projects According to Experts Netguru

What Does GitHub’s Npm Acquisition Mean For Developers? - Hackaday

What Does GitHub’s Npm Acquisition Mean For Developers? Hackaday

Taiwan and Japan Exchange Exhibits of National Treasures - 台灣光華雜誌 Taiwan Panorama

Taiwan and Japan Exchange Exhibits of National Treasures 台灣光華雜誌 Taiwan Panorama

How to install Node.js on Windows - XDA

How to install Node.js on Windows XDA

How a Programmer Nearly Broke The Internet by Deleting Just 11 Lines of Code - ScienceAlert

How a Programmer Nearly Broke The Internet by Deleting Just 11 Lines of Code ScienceAlert

Getting Started with Bootstrap 5, React, and Sass - Designmodo

Getting Started with Bootstrap 5, React, and Sass Designmodo

How to install and use NVM on Windows - XDA

How to install and use NVM on Windows XDA

Bootstrap 4 Tutorial: Working with npm, Grunt.js and Sass (Part 1) - Designmodo

Bootstrap 4 Tutorial: Working with npm, Grunt.js and Sass (Part 1) Designmodo

14 Top Node.js Open Source Projects: 2021 Edition - Hackernoon

14 Top Node.js Open Source Projects: 2021 Edition Hackernoon

What is the government’s new healthy food standard, and how does it work? - Nesta | UK innovation agency for social good

What is the government’s new healthy food standard, and how does it work? Nesta | UK innovation agency for social good

(PDF) The Impacts of the New Public Management in Europe - A Meta-Analysis - researchgate.net

(PDF) The Impacts of the New Public Management in Europe - A Meta-Analysis researchgate.net

OPCAT in Australia Consultation Paper (2017) - Australian Human Rights Commission

OPCAT in Australia Consultation Paper (2017) Australian Human Rights Commission

Fredric Landell new CEO of Nordic Property Management | Strawberry - Mynewsdesk

Fredric Landell new CEO of Nordic Property Management | Strawberry Mynewsdesk

Connock: More Funding Required To Protect Most Vulnerable - Tasmanian Times - Tasmanian Times

Connock: More Funding Required To Protect Most Vulnerable - Tasmanian Times Tasmanian Times

PM Modi dedicates NPM to nation, says God might have chosen him for doing good works - The Statesman

PM Modi dedicates NPM to nation, says God might have chosen him for doing good works The Statesman

How to install the latest npm on Ubuntu 20.04 - Techzim

How to install the latest npm on Ubuntu 20.04 Techzim

npm 3.0 Beta Is Out, Adds Progress Bars to the Package Installation Screen - Softpedia

npm 3.0 Beta Is Out, Adds Progress Bars to the Package Installation Screen Softpedia

NPM people graph sample