O'Connor Design
Company intelligence

O'Connor Design Company Intelligence, Employees & Workforce Signals

People graph depth
3 signals
3 mapped workforce signals against a 5 employee size estimate.
Account research
5 steps
Account research checklist combines buying-committee coverage, ICP fit, technology workforce evidence, related-company graph, and people graph depth; raw contact values are hidden.
Technology talent
3
Technology-oriented role signals in the workforce graph.
Social audience
2
Audience size from company social follower data.
Evidence quality 100/100 Priority intelligence record

AeroLeads company intelligence

O'Connor Design workforce intelligence signals

Evidence from AeroLeads company records, matched professional profiles, and related company graph.

High confidence
Intelligence completeness
Partial intelligence record
6 of 11 major intelligence groups are available for this company.
Profile graph
Deep profile graph
3 mapped workforce signals against a 5 employee size estimate.
Top seniority band
Executive
2 of 3 classified profile signals.
Technology talent
3
Technology roles and departments found in workforce signals.
Social followers
2
Audience size from company social data.

Profile graph researchability

Visible people graph includes 3 visible people: 3 named, 3 titled, 2 located, and 0 contactable.

Profile research sample
Profile coverage evidence tier: Deep profile coverage evidence. Profile coverage evidence combines 3 mapped workforce signals, 5 employee size estimate, and 60.0% profile graph coverage.
Multi-signal profile graph evidence: Researchability is based on 3 visible people with 3 populated evidence dimensions: named, titled, and located signals.
People
3
Named
3
Titled
3
Located
2
Contactable
0

Data methodology

AeroLeads renders only source-backed fields for this company page.

4 source groups
Company record Matched profile graph Related company graph Company signal fields
Blank source fields are omitted
Related companies are ordered deterministically
Structured data uses aggregate counts only

Intelligence completeness

6 of 11 major intelligence groups are available for this company.

6 / 11 groups
Partial intelligence record 54.5%
Workforce composition Contactability Decision makers Buying committee Technology talent Market and peer context

Evidence quality

This page clears the 60+ AeroLeads company-intelligence evidence threshold.

100 / 100
Priority intelligence record Threshold 60+
Business function mix Functional team estimates Functional coverage gap Decision-maker coverage Technology talent Technology role diversity
Workforce graph
11 signals
Business function mix, Profile graph researchability, Workforce location footprint
Source trust
7 signals
Functional team estimates, Functional coverage gap, Intelligence completeness
Decision-maker intelligence
3 signals
Decision-maker coverage, Buying committee coverage, Account research checklist
Technology intelligence
4 signals
Technology talent, Technology role diversity, Technology leadership depth
Market and peer context
12 signals
Related company graph, Peer graph strength, Peer position benchmark
Company momentum
2 signals
Company signal breadth, Company ownership signal
33 additional source-backed evidence signals are counted in this page quality score.

Prospecting readiness

O'Connor Design shows research-first prospecting fit based on decision-maker coverage, technology workforce evidence, people graph depth, and peer context.

40 / 100
Research-first prospecting fit Corroborated prospecting evidence

Prospecting evidence combines decision-maker coverage, technology workforce evidence, people graph depth, and peer context; raw contact values are hidden.

ICP fit
Research ICP fit

ICP fit combines company size, market specificity, buying committee, technology path, and people graph depth; raw contact values are hidden.

56 / 100
Company size
5 employees
Employee estimate is available for ICP filtering.
Market specificity
Tagged market profile
2 category and specialty signals in the company record.
Buying committee
Mapped buying committee
Mapped decision-maker signals span 2 business functions.
Technology path
Mapped technology evidence
3 matched technology role signals found in the workforce graph.
People graph depth
Deep profile graph
3 mapped workforce signals against a 5 employee size estimate.
Account research checklist
Source-backed account research checklist

Account research checklist combines buying-committee coverage, ICP fit, technology workforce evidence, related-company graph, and people graph depth; raw contact values are hidden.

5 steps
Map reachable buying committee
Mapped buying committee
Buying-committee evidence combines 2 mapped buying-committee functions and Product / design and Technology / data function coverage.
Validate ICP fit
Research ICP fit
ICP fit combines company size, market specificity, buying committee, technology path, and people graph depth; raw contact values are hidden.
Review technology path
Mapped technology evidence
3 matched technology role signals found in the workforce graph.
Compare related peers
Limited peer comparison
Compares this company with related-company evidence across employee scale and peer graph evidence.
Review people graph depth
Deep profile graph
3 mapped workforce signals against a 5 employee size estimate.
Decision-maker coverage
Mapped buying committee
Mapped decision-maker signals span 2 business functions.
Technology contact path
Mapped technology evidence
3 matched technology role signals found in the workforce graph.
People graph depth
Deep profile graph
3 mapped workforce signals against a 5 employee size estimate.
Peer context
Multi-signal peer benchmark evidence
Peer benchmark combines 4 related companies with peer graph strength, size benchmark, and size position. Underlying peer graph includes 3 evidence types: employee benchmarks, website records, social profiles.
Person-level contact coverage missing: No visible people on this page include email or phone contact evidence.

AeroLeads coverage snapshot

Profile sample
3
Visible people attached to this company page.
Profile graph depth
Deep profile graph
3 mapped workforce signals against a 5 employee size estimate.
Technology talent
3
Visible profiles matching technology role patterns.
Technology evidence confidence
Mapped technology evidence
3 matched technology role signals found in the workforce graph.
Company signal breadth
Two-signal company record
Company-level signals include social audience and ownership.
Company ownership signal
Company type signal
Company source record includes source type Self-Employed.
Audience density
Low audience density
2 followers against 5 employee estimate, about 0.4 followers per estimated employee.
Specialty signals
1
Specialty tags in the company record.
Market specificity
Tagged market profile
2 category and specialty signals in the company record.
Peer industry clusters
3
Industries represented by related company records.
Related companies
4
Company graph links available for comparison.
Industry benchmark
Peer-informed industry benchmark
Industry benchmark uses 4 related companies, 3 benchmark dimensions, and 3 peer evidence types from the AeroLeads related-company graph.
Peer benchmark confidence
Multi-signal peer benchmark evidence
Peer benchmark combines 4 related companies with peer graph strength, size benchmark, and size position. Underlying peer graph includes 3 evidence types: employee benchmarks, website records, social profiles.
Peer position benchmark
Employee-scale peer position benchmark
Peer-position benchmark shows employee scale above 0% of 4 comparable related peers.
Peer comparison matrix
Limited peer comparison
Compares this company with related-company evidence across employee scale and peer graph evidence.
Workforce locations
2
Locations represented in visible profile signals.
Workforce distribution
Multi-location workforce
Visible profile location signals span 2 locations, led by Porto, Portugal.
Workforce location footprint
Multi-country workforce footprint
Visible profile locations span 2 cities across 2 countries, led by Porto.
Workforce geography evidence confidence
Multi-location workforce geography evidence
Workforce geography spans 2 locations across 2 visible profile signals.
Workforce seniority tiers
2
Seniority bands derived from visible profile titles and levels.
Seniority evidence confidence
Multi-tier seniority evidence
Seniority graph spans 3 classified profile signals across 2 tiers. Leadership-heavy visible sample.
Classified seniority profiles
3
Visible profiles with usable seniority signals.
Management-to-IC proxy
Leadership-heavy visible sample
2 managerial seniority signals and 1 contributor signal appear in the visible seniority-classified sample.
Role title diversity
Diverse role title sample
3 distinct role titles across 3 visible titled profiles.
Visible role titles
3
Distinct role titles found in visible profile signals.
Business function mix
Multi-function workforce sample
AeroLeads maps 3 visible profile signals into 3 business functions; 0 include visible contact data.
Mapped business functions
3
Business functions inferred from visible profile titles and departments.
Functional team estimates
Revenue and engineering team estimates
AeroLeads derives 1 visible revenue team profile signal and 1 visible engineering team profile signal from mapped business-function signals.
Functional coverage gaps
Partial function coverage map
Visible people signals cover 3 of 8 core business functions. Not observed in the visible graph: Sales / revenue, People / HR, Finance, and Operations. Treat this as a coverage gap, not confirmed absence.
Decision-maker signals
2
Visible profiles matching seniority or leadership title patterns.
Decision-maker reachability
No visible decision-maker contact coverage
Mapped decision-maker signals do not include visible contact data.
Buying committee evidence confidence
Mapped buying committee
Mapped decision-maker signals span 2 business functions.
Buyer persona availability
Dual-persona buyer availability
Mapped decision-maker evidence covers Product buyer and Technology buyer; 0 of 2 buyer personas include visible contact data.
Prospecting fit
Research-first prospecting fit
O'Connor Design shows research-first prospecting fit based on decision-maker coverage, technology workforce evidence, people graph depth, and peer context.
ICP fit
Research ICP fit
O'Connor Design matches the research ICP fit band for common outbound filters based on company size, market specificity, buying committee, technology path, and people graph depth.
Account research checklist
Source-backed account research checklist
Account research checklist combines buying-committee coverage, ICP fit, technology workforce evidence, related-company graph, and people graph depth; raw contact values are hidden.
Intelligence signal groups
11
AeroLeads signal groups available for this company.

Market focus signals

Primary industry
Graphic Design
Market specificity
Tagged market profile
2 category and specialty signals in the company record.
Market evidence tier
Corroborated market evidence
Market evidence combines 5 classification signals from categories, specialties, and related peer industries.
Industry benchmark
Peer-informed industry benchmark
Industry benchmark uses 4 related companies, 3 benchmark dimensions, and 3 peer evidence types from the AeroLeads related-company graph.
Top peer industry
Media Production
50% of 4 related peer industry signals.
Peer benchmark evidence
Multi-signal peer benchmark evidence
Peer benchmark combines 4 related companies with peer graph strength, size benchmark, and size position. Underlying peer graph includes 3 evidence types: employee benchmarks, website records, social profiles.
Size position
Smaller than most related peers
4 of 4 related employee-estimated peers are higher.
Peer graph strength
Partial peer evidence graph
Related peer graph has employee benchmarks, website records, and social profiles across 4 related companies.
Benchmark dimensions: peer graph strength, size benchmark, and size position.
Categories
Graphic Design
Specialties
Chicago
Product-market keyword evidence
Limited market keywords
Keyword evidence comes from 2 source field groups: Category, Specialty.
Product-market keyword evidence tier: Limited product-market keyword evidence. Product-market keyword evidence combines 2 unique market keywords and 2 source field groups (1 category and 1 specialty).
Graphic Design · Category Chicago · Specialty
Related peer industries
Peer-industry evidence tier: Corroborated peer-industry evidence. Peer-industry evidence combines 4 related companies, 3 peer-industry clusters, and top peer industry Media Production at 50.0%.
Functional coverage gaps
Partial function coverage map
Visible people signals cover 3 of 8 core business functions. Not observed in the visible graph: Sales / revenue, People / HR, Finance, and Operations. Treat this as a coverage gap, not confirmed absence.
Transparent function coverage evidence: Function coverage evidence combines observed functions Marketing / growth, Technology / data, and Product / design and 5 unobserved core functions in the visible graph.
Media Production 2 peers
50.0% of related peer industries
Marketing Services 1 peer
25.0% of related peer industries
Insurance 1 peer
25.0% of related peer industries

Company signals

Company signal breadth
Two-signal company record
Company-level signals include social audience and ownership.
Corroborated company record evidence: Company record evidence combines 2 source-backed company signal types: social audience and ownership.
Social audience
2
Followers in the company source record.
Social audience evidence tier: Limited social-audience evidence. Social audience evidence uses 2 followers from source field social_followers.
Audience density
Low audience density
2 followers against 5 employee estimate, about 0.4 followers per estimated employee.
Audience-density evidence tier: Limited audience-density evidence. Audience-density evidence combines 2 social followers, 5 employee estimate, and 0.4 followers per estimated employee.
Company ownership
Company type signal
Company source record includes source type Self-Employed.
Company ownership evidence tier: Structured ownership evidence. Ownership evidence combines source type Self-Employed from structured company source fields.

Technology talent signals

3 matched technology role signals.

Technology evidence tier
Mapped technology evidence
3 matched technology role signals found in the workforce graph.
High technology leadership depth 66.7%
2 of 3 matched technology role signals indicate leadership seniority.
Technology leadership depth evidence tier: High technology leadership depth evidence. Technology leadership depth evidence combines 2 technology leadership signals, 3 matched technology signals, and 66.7% leadership depth.
Technology role mix
Multi-area technology role mix
Matched technology signals span Product / design and Engineering role groups.
Technology role evidence tier: Multi-area technology role evidence. Technology role evidence combines 3 matched technology role signals, 2 technology role groups, and Product / design and Engineering.
Product / design 2 profiles
66.7% of matched technology role signals
Engineering 1 profile
33.3% of matched technology role signals
Matched role examples
Owner at O’connor Design Build 1
Brand & Packaging Designer 1
Owner/engineer at O'connor Design 1

Workforce seniority mix

Aggregated from 3 classified profile signals.

Largest seniority band
Executive
2 of 3 classified profile signals.
Multi-tier seniority evidence: Seniority graph spans 3 classified profile signals across 2 tiers. Leadership-heavy visible sample.
Management-to-IC proxy
Leadership-heavy visible sample
66.7%
managerial seniority signals
33.3%
contributor seniority signals
2 managerial seniority signals and 1 contributor signal appear in the visible seniority-classified sample.
Management-shape evidence tier: Leadership-heavy management-shape evidence. Management-shape evidence combines 3 seniority-classified signals, 2 managerial signals, 66.7% managerial share, and 1 contributor signal.
Executive 2 profiles
66.7% of classified seniority signals
Individual contributor 1 profile
33.3% of classified seniority signals

Workforce geography

Aggregated from 2 visible profile location signals.

Workforce geography evidence
Multi-location workforce geography evidence
Workforce geography spans 2 locations across 2 visible profile signals.
Distribution signal
Multi-location workforce
Visible profile location signals span 2 locations, led by Porto, Portugal.
Workforce location footprint
Multi-country workforce footprint
Visible profile locations span 2 cities across 2 countries, led by Porto.
Cities
2
Countries
2
Porto, Portugal 1 profile
50.0% of visible location signals
Victoria, British Columbia, Canada 1 profile
50.0% of visible location signals

Decision-maker coverage

2 seniority signals.

Decision-maker evidence tier
Mapped decision-maker evidence
Decision-maker evidence covers 2 seniority signals. Buying committee spans 2 functions.
No visible decision-maker contact coverage
Mapped decision-maker signals do not include visible contact data.
Buying committee function coverage
Multi-function buying-committee coverage
0 of 2 mapped functions include visible decision-maker contact data.
Mapped buying committee: Mapped decision-maker signals span 2 business functions.
Buying committee evidence tier: Mapped buying-committee evidence. Buying-committee evidence combines 2 mapped buying-committee functions and Product / design and Technology / data function coverage.
Buyer persona availability: Dual-persona buyer availability. Mapped decision-maker evidence covers Product buyer and Technology buyer; 0 of 2 buyer personas include visible contact data. Mapped buyer persona evidence: Buyer persona evidence combines 2 mapped buyer personas and Product buyer and Technology buyer coverage.
Product / design Technology / data
Executive 2 profiles
100.0% of mapped seniority signals

Role and function mix

3 visible titled profiles across 3 distinct role titles.

Title mix
Diverse role title sample
3 distinct role titles across 3 visible titled profiles.
Role-title evidence tier: Diverse role-title evidence. Role-title diversity evidence combines 3 visible titled profiles, 3 distinct role titles, and top title Brand & Packaging Designer at 33.3%.
Business function mix
Multi-function workforce sample
AeroLeads maps 3 visible profile signals into 3 business functions; 0 include visible contact data.
Business-function evidence tier: Mapped business-function evidence. Business-function evidence combines 3 mapped function profile signals, 3 business functions, and top function Marketing / growth at 33.3%.
Functional team estimates
Revenue and engineering team estimates
AeroLeads derives 1 visible revenue team profile signal and 1 visible engineering team profile signal from mapped business-function signals.
Mapped functional team evidence: Functional team estimate evidence combines 1 visible revenue team profile signal and 1 visible engineering team profile signal.
Revenue team estimate 1 profile
33.3% of mapped function signals; Marketing / growth
Engineering team estimate 1 profile
33.3% of mapped function signals; Technology / data
Marketing / growth 1 profile
33.3% of mapped function signals
Product / design 1 profile
33.3% of mapped function signals
Technology / data 1 profile
33.3% of mapped function signals
Brand & Packaging Designer 1 profile
33.3% of visible titled profiles
Owner at O’connor Design Build 1 profile
33.3% of visible titled profiles
Owner/engineer at O'connor Design 1 profile
33.3% of visible titled profiles

Contactability signals

Visible people
3

Explore related pages

Related company intelligence:

Company source details

Employees
5
Industry
Graphic Design
NAICS
Graphic Design Services
Keywords
Chicago.
Related companies
Optimus, Intersport, ROC Group, Richter Studios.

O'Connor Design Questions

O'Connor Design people graph sample