Project Orphans

Project Orphans Company Intelligence, Employees & Contact Signals

Contact coverage
Email + phone
Visible profile or company source data includes email and phone channels. 2 visible profiles include direct contact evidence.
People graph depth
3 signals
Deep profile graph across 2 mapped departments.
Account research
6 steps
Account research checklist combines person-level contact coverage, buying-committee coverage, ICP fit, related-company graph, domain trust, and people graph depth; raw contact values are hidden.
Email domain match
25% match
Official-domain coverage across 2 of 8 visible email signals for projectorphans.org.
Evidence quality 100/100 Priority intelligence record

AeroLeads company intelligence

Project Orphans workforce and contactability signals

Evidence from AeroLeads company records, matched professional profiles, and related company graph.

High confidence
Intelligence completeness
Strong intelligence record
7 of 11 major intelligence groups are available for this company.
Largest mapped team
Executive
2 profile signals in Executive.
Departments mapped
2
Workforce composition from AeroLeads profile data.
Profile graph
Deep profile graph
3 mapped workforce signals against a 9 employee size estimate.
Top seniority band
Director
2 of 6 classified profile signals.
Visible contact sample
2
Displayed people with email or phone data.
Top email pattern
first
100.0% of matched email patterns.

Profile graph researchability

Visible people graph includes 6 visible people: 6 named, 6 titled, 5 located, and 2 contactable.

Multi-signal profile graph
Profile coverage evidence tier: Deep profile coverage evidence. Profile coverage evidence combines 3 mapped workforce signals, 9 employee size estimate, and 33.3% profile graph coverage.
Corroborated profile graph evidence: Researchability is based on 6 visible people with 4 populated evidence dimensions: named, titled, located, and contactable signals.
Profile association confidence: Profile association sample. Association confidence combines 6 titled profiles, 1 official-domain email profile, 1 titled profiles with official-domain email, 1 located profiles with official-domain email, and 2 contactable profiles.
People
6
Named
6
Titled
6
Located
5
Contactable
2

Data methodology

AeroLeads renders only source-backed fields for this company page.

5 source groups
Company record Matched profile graph Email-pattern aggregate Related company graph Company signal fields
Blank source fields are omitted
Related companies are ordered deterministically
Structured data uses aggregate counts only

Intelligence completeness

7 of 11 major intelligence groups are available for this company.

7 / 11 groups
Strong intelligence record 63.6%
Workforce composition Contactability Email intelligence Decision makers Buying committee Domain confidence Market and peer context

Evidence quality

This page clears the 60+ AeroLeads company-intelligence evidence threshold.

100 / 100
Priority intelligence record Threshold 60+
Workforce composition Employee email coverage Employee phone coverage Department seniority map Role title reachability Official-domain role title reachability
Workforce graph
22 signals
Workforce composition, Department seniority map, Role title reachability
Contactability
13 signals
Employee email coverage, Employee phone coverage, Email pattern intelligence
Decision-maker intelligence
11 signals
Decision-maker coverage, Leadership signals, Department leadership coverage
Market and peer context
13 signals
Related company graph, Peer graph strength, Peer position benchmark
Company momentum
3 signals
Company signal breadth, Company momentum score, Company ownership signal
Source trust
11 signals
Domain confidence, Multi-source domain alignment, Intelligence completeness
67 additional source-backed evidence signals are counted in this page quality score.

Prospecting readiness

Project Orphans shows actionable prospecting fit based on person-level contact coverage, decision-maker coverage, people graph depth, and peer context.

60 / 100
Actionable prospecting fit Corroborated prospecting evidence

Prospecting evidence combines person-level contact coverage, decision-maker coverage, people graph depth, and peer context; raw contact values are hidden.

ICP fit
Qualified ICP fit

ICP fit combines company size, market specificity, contactability, buying committee, and domain trust; raw contact values are hidden.

73 / 100
Company size
9 employees
Employee estimate is available for ICP filtering.
Market specificity
Focused market profile
9 market classification signals across categories, specialties, and related peer industries.
Reachability
High-confidence contact evidence
2 current or verified professional email signals, 1 company-domain email signal, and multi-channel contact coverage; raw addresses and numbers are hidden.
Buying committee
Mapped buying committee
Mapped decision-maker signals span 1 business function.
Domain trust
High-confidence domain alignment
Domain evidence combines website domain, social profile, employee email alignment, profile-domain association, and company email sample; raw email addresses are hidden.
Account research checklist
Multi-step account research checklist

Account research checklist combines person-level contact coverage, buying-committee coverage, ICP fit, related-company graph, domain trust, and people graph depth; raw contact values are hidden.

6 steps
Confirm contact coverage
High-confidence contact evidence
2 current or verified professional email signals, 1 company-domain email signal, and multi-channel contact coverage; raw addresses and numbers are hidden.
Map reachable buying committee
Mapped buying committee
Buying-committee evidence combines 1 mapped buying-committee function, 1 contactable function, 1 official-domain function on projectorphans.org, and Executive / corporate function coverage.
Validate ICP fit
Qualified ICP fit
ICP fit combines company size, market specificity, contactability, buying committee, and domain trust; raw contact values are hidden.
Compare related peers
Limited peer comparison
Compares this company with related-company evidence across employee scale and peer graph evidence.
Check domain trust
High-confidence domain alignment
Domain evidence combines website domain, social profile, employee email alignment, profile-domain association, and company email sample; raw email addresses are hidden.
Review people graph depth
Deep profile graph
3 mapped workforce signals against a 9 employee size estimate.
Contact coverage
High-confidence contact evidence
2 current or verified professional email signals, 1 company-domain email signal, and multi-channel contact coverage; raw addresses and numbers are hidden.
Decision-maker coverage
Mapped buying committee
Mapped decision-maker signals span 1 business function.
People graph depth
Deep profile graph
3 mapped workforce signals against a 9 employee size estimate.
Peer context
Multi-signal peer benchmark evidence
Peer benchmark combines 8 related companies with peer graph strength, size benchmark, and size position. Underlying peer graph includes 3 evidence types: employee benchmarks, website records, social profiles.

Domain trust signals

Domain confidence for projectorphans.org is based on website domain, social profile, employee email alignment, profile-domain association, and company email sample.

80 / 100
High-confidence domain alignment High-confidence domain evidence

Domain evidence combines website domain, social profile, employee email alignment, profile-domain association, and company email sample; raw email addresses are hidden.

Website domain
projectorphans.org
The official website domain is available from the company source record.
Social profile
LinkedIn organization page
A LinkedIn organization page is present for this company record.
Employee email alignment
2 official-domain email signals
25% of visible employee email signals match projectorphans.org; raw addresses are hidden.
Profile-domain association
1 people with official-domain email
Matched people include official-domain email evidence; raw addresses are hidden.
Company email sample
1 official-domain source email records
Company-level email source records include official-domain coverage; raw addresses are hidden.

AeroLeads coverage snapshot

Profile sample
4
Visible people attached to this company page.
Profile graph depth
Deep profile graph
3 mapped workforce signals against a 9 employee size estimate.
Contactable sample
2
Visible people with email or phone data.
Contact channel mix
Multi-channel contact coverage
Visible profile or company source data includes email and phone channels.
Contact evidence confidence
High-confidence contact evidence
2 current or verified professional email signals, 1 company-domain email signal, and multi-channel contact coverage; raw addresses and numbers are hidden.
Department coverage
2
Departments represented in AeroLeads workforce signals.
Department concentration
Multi-department workforce
Mapped workforce signals span 2 departments, led by Executive.
Leadership signals
3
Department lead or leadership signals in the org data.
Department leader sample
Department leader sample
AeroLeads source data includes 3 leadership signals across 2 departments; rows show titles and contact-channel presence only.
Department leadership coverage
Broad department leadership coverage
Leadership signals appear across 2 of 2 mapped departments.
Leadership density
100
Percent of mapped department signals that are leadership signals.
Department seniority map
Two-department seniority map
Visible department samples map 3 seniority-classified profiles across 2 departments and 2 seniority bands.
Email-pattern variants
1
Distinct matched business email patterns.
Official-domain emails
2
Email signals matching projectorphans.org.
Email domain confidence
Mixed-domain coverage
Visible email signals include official-domain and non-official domains.
Domain confidence
High-confidence domain alignment
Domain confidence for projectorphans.org is based on website domain, social profile, employee email alignment, profile-domain association, and company email sample.
Email usability mix
Current email coverage sample
AeroLeads source data includes 8 unique visible email signals; 2 are marked current or verified and 4 are professional-type. Raw addresses are hidden.
Contact data safety
Corroborated privacy-safe contact intelligence
AeroLeads exposes contact counts, channel mix, freshness, and domain-alignment evidence while hiding raw email addresses and masking phone numbers in public output.
Company signal breadth
Multi-signal company record
Company-level signals include social audience, company maturity, and ownership.
Company momentum score
Limited company momentum score
Momentum score blends contactability and peer position from AeroLeads company and profile evidence.
Company ownership signal
Nonprofit organization record
Company source record includes source type Nonprofit.
Audience density
Moderate audience density
188 followers against 9 employee estimate, about 20.90 followers per estimated employee.
Specialty signals
3
Specialty tags in the company record.
Market specificity
Focused market profile
9 market classification signals across categories, specialties, and related peer industries.
Peer industry clusters
7
Industries represented by related company records.
Related companies
8
Company graph links available for comparison.
Industry benchmark
Peer-informed industry benchmark
Industry benchmark uses 8 related companies, 3 benchmark dimensions, and 3 peer evidence types from the AeroLeads related-company graph.
Peer benchmark confidence
Multi-signal peer benchmark evidence
Peer benchmark combines 8 related companies with peer graph strength, size benchmark, and size position. Underlying peer graph includes 3 evidence types: employee benchmarks, website records, social profiles.
Peer position benchmark
Employee-scale peer position benchmark
Peer-position benchmark shows employee scale above 14.3% of 7 comparable related peers.
Peer comparison matrix
Limited peer comparison
Compares this company with related-company evidence across employee scale and peer graph evidence.
Workforce locations
4
Locations represented in visible profile signals.
Workforce distribution
Distributed workforce
Visible profile location signals are spread across 4 locations.
Workforce location footprint
Multi-country workforce footprint
Visible profile locations span 4 cities across 2 countries, led by Kampala.
Workforce distribution model
International distributed workforce model
Visible profile locations span 2 countries and 4 workforce locations; no single hub exceeds 40% of visible location signals.
Workforce geography evidence confidence
Corroborated workforce geography evidence
Workforce geography spans 4 locations across 5 visible profile signals, with reachable evidence across 2 locations. Top workforce hub differs from company location.
Contactable workforce locations
2
Workforce locations represented by visible contact samples.
Top contactable workforce location
Tulsa, Oklahoma, United States
Visible contact samples span 2 workforce locations, led by Tulsa, Oklahoma, United States.
Workforce seniority tiers
4
Seniority bands derived from visible profile titles and levels.
Seniority evidence confidence
Corroborated seniority evidence
Seniority graph spans 6 classified profile signals across 4 tiers, with reachable evidence for 2 and company-domain evidence for 1. Leadership-heavy visible sample.
Classified seniority profiles
6
Visible profiles with usable seniority signals.
Official-domain seniority profiles
Official-domain seniority evidence
1 seniority-classified profile across 1 tier includes company-domain email signals.
Management-to-IC proxy
Leadership-heavy visible sample
4 managerial seniority signals and 2 contributor signals appear in the visible seniority-classified sample.
Role title diversity
Diverse role title sample
5 distinct role titles across 6 visible titled profiles.
Visible role titles
5
Distinct role titles found in visible profile signals.
Contactable role titles
2
Distinct role titles with visible contact samples.
Contactable role coverage
Mixed contactable role coverage
2 reachable role titles, led by Co-founder & CEO of Project Orphans, Inc & Tulsa Girls' Home at 50.0% of contactable titled profiles.
Decision-maker signals
4
Visible profiles matching seniority or leadership title patterns.
Decision-maker reachability
Partial decision-maker reachability
Some mapped decision-maker signals include visible contact data.
Buying committee evidence confidence
Mapped buying committee
Mapped decision-maker signals span 1 business function.
Buyer persona availability
Single-persona buyer availability
Mapped decision-maker evidence covers Executive buyer; 1 of 1 buyer persona include visible contact data.
Decision-maker contactability rate
25
Percent of mapped decision-maker signals with visible contact data.
Official-domain decision-maker coverage
Strong official-domain decision-maker coverage
Most contactable decision-maker signals use projectorphans.org email coverage.
Official-domain decision-maker contacts
1
Contactable decision-maker signals with official-domain email coverage.
Prospecting fit
Actionable prospecting fit
Project Orphans shows actionable prospecting fit based on person-level contact coverage, decision-maker coverage, people graph depth, and peer context.
ICP fit
Qualified ICP fit
Project Orphans matches the qualified ICP fit band for common outbound filters based on company size, market specificity, contactability, buying committee, and domain trust.
Account research checklist
Multi-step account research checklist
Account research checklist combines person-level contact coverage, buying-committee coverage, ICP fit, related-company graph, domain trust, and people graph depth; raw contact values are hidden.
Intelligence signal groups
21
AeroLeads signal groups available for this company.

Market focus signals

Primary industry
Philanthropic Fundraising Services
Market specificity
Focused market profile
9 market classification signals across categories, specialties, and related peer industries.
Market evidence tier
High-confidence market evidence
Market evidence combines 9 classification signals from categories, specialties, related peer industries, and description keywords. 6 description-backed keyword signals are included.
Industry benchmark
Peer-informed industry benchmark
Industry benchmark uses 8 related companies, 3 benchmark dimensions, and 3 peer evidence types from the AeroLeads related-company graph.
Top peer industry
Non-profit Organizations
25% of 8 related peer industry signals.
Peer benchmark evidence
Multi-signal peer benchmark evidence
Peer benchmark combines 8 related companies with peer graph strength, size benchmark, and size position. Underlying peer graph includes 3 evidence types: employee benchmarks, website records, social profiles.
Size position
Smaller than most related peers
6 of 7 related employee-estimated peers are higher.
Peer graph strength
Partial peer evidence graph
Related peer graph has employee benchmarks, website records, and social profiles across 8 related companies.
Benchmark dimensions: peer graph strength, size benchmark, and size position.
Categories
Philanthropic Fundraising Services
Specialties
International Business Non-Profit Child Services
Product-market keyword evidence
Description-backed market keywords
Keyword evidence comes from 3 source field groups: Category, Specialty, Description.
Product-market keyword evidence tier: High-confidence product-market keyword evidence. Product-market keyword evidence combines 10 unique market keywords, 3 source field groups, and 6 description-backed keywords (1 category, 3 specialty, and 6 description).
Philanthropic Fundraising Services · Category International Business · Specialty Non-Profit · Specialty Child Services · Specialty christina set out · Description orphan care · Description grassroots approach · Description equipping communities · Description vulnerable children unveiled · Description they met people · Description
Related peer industries
Peer-industry evidence tier: High-confidence peer-industry evidence. Peer-industry evidence combines 8 related companies, 5 peer-industry clusters, and top peer industry Non-profit Organizations at 25.0%.
Non-profit Organizations 2 peers
25.0% of related peer industries
Hospitals and Health Care 1 peer
12.5% of related peer industries
Wellness and Fitness Services 1 peer
12.5% of related peer industries
Entertainment Providers 1 peer
12.5% of related peer industries
Advertising Services 1 peer
12.5% of related peer industries

Company signals

Company signal breadth
Multi-signal company record
Company-level signals include social audience, company maturity, and ownership.
Corroborated company record evidence: Company record evidence combines 3 source-backed company signal types: social audience, company maturity, and ownership.
Social audience
188
Followers in the company source record.
Social audience evidence tier: Limited social-audience evidence. Social audience evidence uses 188 followers from source field social_followers.
Audience density
Moderate audience density
188 followers against 9 employee estimate, about 20.90 followers per estimated employee.
Audience-density evidence tier: Limited audience-density evidence. Audience-density evidence combines 188 social followers, 9 employee estimate, and 20.90 followers per estimated employee.
Company maturity
Scaling company history
Company source record includes founding year 2012, about 14 years before 2026.
Company maturity evidence tier: Founding-year maturity evidence. Maturity evidence combines founding year 2012, 14 years of company history, and source field founded.
Company ownership
Nonprofit organization record
Company source record includes source type Nonprofit.
Company ownership evidence tier: Structured ownership evidence. Ownership evidence combines source type Nonprofit from structured company source fields.

Workforce composition

Department concentration
Multi-department workforce
Mapped workforce signals span 2 departments, led by Executive. 66.7% of mapped department signals are in the largest department.
Department concentration evidence tier: Multi-department concentration evidence. Department concentration evidence combines 2 mapped departments, top department Executive, and 66.7% top-department share.
Department leadership coverage
Broad department leadership coverage
Leadership signals appear across 2 of 2 mapped departments. Leadership signals represent 100.0% of mapped department signals.
Department leadership evidence tier: Corroborated department leadership evidence. Department leadership evidence combines 3 leadership signals, 2 of 2 mapped departments, and 100.0% leadership density.
Department seniority map
Two-department seniority map
Visible department samples map 3 seniority-classified profiles across 2 departments and 2 seniority bands.
Department seniority evidence tier: Corroborated department seniority evidence. Department seniority evidence combines 3 seniority-classified profiles, 2 departments, 2 seniority bands, and top cell Executive + Director with 2 profiles.
Executive 2 profiles
Director: 2
General 1 profile
Manager: 1
3 leadership signals
Department leader sample
Department leader sample
0 contactable

AeroLeads source data includes 3 leadership signals across 2 departments; rows show titles and contact-channel presence only.

Department leader evidence tier: Corroborated department leader evidence. Department leader evidence combines 3 leadership signals and 2 departments; raw contacts are hidden.
Leader Department Seniority Channel
George Sanger
Executive Director at Project Orphans
 Executive Director No visible contact channel
Sanger George Mugume
Executive Director at Project Orphans
 Executive Director No visible contact channel
Namutebi Joanne
Project Manager
 General Manager No visible contact channel
Executive 2 signals
66.7% of mapped department signals, 2 leadership signals
General 1 signals
33.3% of mapped department signals, 1 leadership signals

Workforce seniority mix

Aggregated from 6 classified profile signals.

Largest seniority band
Director
2 of 6 classified profile signals.
Official-domain seniority evidence: 1 seniority-classified profile across 1 tier includes company-domain email signals.
Corroborated seniority evidence: Seniority graph spans 6 classified profile signals across 4 tiers, with reachable evidence for 2 and company-domain evidence for 1. Leadership-heavy visible sample.
Management-to-IC proxy
Leadership-heavy visible sample
66.7%
managerial seniority signals
33.3%
contributor seniority signals
4 managerial seniority signals and 2 contributor signals appear in the visible seniority-classified sample.
Management-shape evidence tier: Leadership-heavy management-shape evidence. Management-shape evidence combines 6 seniority-classified signals, 4 managerial signals, 66.7% managerial share, and 2 contributor signals.
Director 2 profiles
33.3% of classified seniority signals
Individual contributor 2 profiles
33.3% of classified seniority signals, 1 with visible contact data
Executive 1 profile
16.7% of classified seniority signals, 1 with visible contact data, 1 official-domain
Manager 1 profile
16.7% of classified seniority signals

Workforce geography

Aggregated from 5 visible profile location signals.

Workforce geography evidence
Corroborated workforce geography evidence
Workforce geography spans 4 locations across 5 visible profile signals, with reachable evidence across 2 locations. Top workforce hub differs from company location.
Distribution signal
Distributed workforce
Visible profile location signals are spread across 4 locations.
Workforce distribution model
International distributed workforce model
Visible profile locations span 2 countries and 4 workforce locations; no single hub exceeds 40% of visible location signals.
Corroborated workforce model evidence: Workforce model evidence combines 5 located profile signals, 4 workforce locations, 4 cities, 2 countries, top hub Kampala, Central Region, Uganda at 40%, company-location alignment, and 2 reachable locations.
Locations
4
Countries
2
Top hub share
40%
Workforce location footprint
Multi-country workforce footprint
Visible profile locations span 4 cities across 2 countries, led by Kampala.
Cities
4
Countries
2
Company-location alignment
Top workforce hub differs from company location
The largest visible workforce location is Kampala, Central Region, Uganda, while the company location is Tulsa, Oklahoma, United States.
Top workforce hub share: 40.0%
Company-location evidence tier: Workforce-location divergence evidence. Company-location alignment evidence combines company location Tulsa, Oklahoma, United States, top workforce hub Kampala, Central Region, Uganda, 40.0% top workforce hub share, and location difference.
Contactable location spread
Multi-location contact coverage
Visible contact samples span 2 workforce locations, led by Tulsa, Oklahoma, United States.
Contactable location evidence tier: Multi-location contactable evidence. Contactable location evidence combines 2 contactable profile location signals, 2 workforce locations, top contactable hub Tulsa, Oklahoma, United States at 50.0%, and company-location alignment.
Contactable workforce hub matches company location: The largest contactable workforce location is Tulsa, Oklahoma, United States, matching the company location Tulsa, Oklahoma, United States. Top contactable hub share: 50.0%.
Tulsa, Oklahoma, United States 1 contact
50.0% of contactable location signals
Irvine, California, United States 1 contact
50.0% of contactable location signals
Kampala, Central Region, Uganda 2 profiles
40.0% of visible location signals
Uganda 1 profile
20.0% of visible location signals
Tulsa, Oklahoma, United States 1 profile
20.0% of visible location signals
Irvine, California, United States 1 profile
20.0% of visible location signals

Decision-maker coverage

4 seniority signals, 1 with visible contact data.

Decision-maker evidence tier
Mapped decision-maker evidence
Decision-maker evidence covers 4 seniority signals, 1 reachable, and 1 company-domain. Buying committee spans 1 function.
Account planning snapshot
Focused account planning snapshot
Snapshot combines department reachability, decision-maker coverage, and buying-committee function aggregates.
2 account-planning evidence cards available.
Account planning evidence tier: Corroborated account planning evidence. Account planning evidence combines 2 aggregate account-planning cards, 1 reachable buying-committee function, 1 official-domain decision-maker signal, and Executive seniority reachability; raw contacts are hidden.
Reachable buying committee
1 of 1 functions
Reachable functions include Executive / corporate.
Most reachable seniority
Executive
1 of 1 signals in this seniority band include visible contact data.
Partial decision-maker reachability 25.0%
Some mapped decision-maker signals include visible contact data.
Decision-maker reachability evidence tier: Partial decision-maker reachability evidence. Decision-maker reachability evidence combines 1 contactable decision-maker signal, 4 mapped decision-maker signals, 25.0% contactability, 1 official-domain decision-maker signal, and 1 dual-channel signal.
Email and phone decision-maker coverage: Mapped decision-maker signals include 1 email signal, 1 phone signal, and 1 with both channels.
Buying committee function coverage
Single-function buying-committee coverage
1 of 1 mapped functions include visible decision-maker contact data.
Single-function official-domain buying committee: 1 of 1 mapped business function include decision-maker email coverage on projectorphans.org.
Mapped buying committee: Mapped decision-maker signals span 1 business function.
Buying committee evidence tier: Mapped buying-committee evidence. Buying-committee evidence combines 1 mapped buying-committee function, 1 contactable function, 1 official-domain function on projectorphans.org, and Executive / corporate function coverage.
Buyer persona availability: Single-persona buyer availability. Mapped decision-maker evidence covers Executive buyer; 1 of 1 buyer persona include visible contact data. Reachable buyer persona evidence: Buyer persona evidence combines 1 mapped buyer persona, 1 contactable persona, 1 official-domain persona on projectorphans.org, and Executive buyer coverage.
Executive / corporate: 1 contactable
Most reachable seniority
Executive
1 of 1 seniority signals include visible contact data.
Seniority reachability evidence tier: High-confidence seniority reachability evidence. Seniority reachability evidence combines 1 contactable Executive signal, 1 Executive signal, 100.0% tier contactability, 1 official-domain Executive signal, and email and phone coverage.
Official-domain decision-maker coverage
Strong official-domain decision-maker coverage
1 contactable decision-maker signals match projectorphans.org. Most contactable decision-maker signals use projectorphans.org email coverage.
Official-domain decision-maker evidence tier: Strong official-domain decision-maker evidence. Official-domain decision-maker evidence combines 1 official-domain decision-maker signal, 1 contactable decision-maker signal, 100.0% official-domain coverage, and projectorphans.org domain match.
Director 2 profiles
50.0% of mapped seniority signals
Executive 1 profile
25.0% of mapped seniority signals, 1 with visible contact data
Manager 1 profile
25.0% of mapped seniority signals

Role and function mix

6 visible titled profiles across 5 distinct role titles.

Title mix
Diverse role title sample
5 distinct role titles across 6 visible titled profiles.
Role-title evidence tier: Diverse role-title evidence. Role-title diversity evidence combines 6 visible titled profiles, 5 distinct role titles, and top title Executive Director at Project Orphans at 33.3%.
Contactable role coverage
Mixed contactable role coverage
2 reachable role titles, led by Co-founder & CEO of Project Orphans, Inc & Tulsa Girls' Home at 50.0% of contactable titled profiles.
Contactable role evidence tier: Corroborated contactable role evidence. Contactable role evidence combines 2 contactable titled profiles, 2 reachable role titles, and top reachable role Co-founder & CEO of Project Orphans, Inc & Tulsa Girls' Home at 50.0%.
Role title reachability
Partial role-title reachability
2 of 5 distinct visible role titles include email or phone signals.
Role-title reachability evidence tier: Corroborated role-title reachability evidence. Role-title reachability evidence combines 5 visible role titles, 2 reachable titles, 40.0% title reachability, and 1 official-domain title.
Single-title official-domain reachability 1 / 5 titles
1 of 5 distinct visible role titles include email signals matching projectorphans.org.
Executive Director at Project Orphans 2 profiles
33.3% of visible titled profiles
Co-founder & CEO of Project Orphans, Inc & Tulsa Girls' Home 1 profile
16.7% of visible titled profiles
Entrepreneur 1 profile
16.7% of visible titled profiles
Physiotherapist at Project Orphans 1 profile
16.7% of visible titled profiles
Project Manager 1 profile
16.7% of visible titled profiles

Contactability signals

Contactability score 50.0%
2 of 4 visible profiles include email or phone signals.
Contact channel mix
Multi-channel contact coverage
Visible profile or company source data includes email and phone channels.
Contact evidence tier
High-confidence contact evidence
2 current or verified professional email signals, 1 company-domain email signal, and multi-channel contact coverage; raw addresses and numbers are hidden.
Contact data safety
Corroborated privacy-safe contact intelligence
AeroLeads exposes contact counts, channel mix, freshness, and domain-alignment evidence while hiding raw email addresses and masking phone numbers in public output.
Aggregate signals
3
Channel coverage
Email and phone aggregate coverage
Evidence groups
4
Corroborated contact-safety evidence: Contact-safety evidence combines visible profile contact sample, company email sample, current email metadata, and official-domain email evidence; public schema uses aggregate variables only.
Aggregate-only contact schema: Dataset variables use counts, rates, channel labels, freshness bands, and domain-alignment metrics instead of raw contact values.
Email usability mix
Current email coverage sample
AeroLeads source data includes 8 unique visible email signals; 2 are marked current or verified and 4 are professional-type. Raw addresses are hidden.
Email usability evidence tier: Corroborated email usability evidence. Email usability evidence combines 8 unique email signals, 2 current or verified, 2 verified, 4 professional-type, and 25.0% current signal rate; raw addresses are hidden.
2 current or verified 4 professional-type 25.0% current signal rate
Visible people
4
With contact data
2
Email coverage
2
50.0% of visible profiles
Phone coverage
2
50.0% of visible profiles
Company email sample
Limited company email sample
AeroLeads source data includes 1 email record across 1 domain; raw addresses are hidden. 1 match projectorphans.org.
Source email evidence tier: Limited source email evidence. Source email evidence combines 1 unique source email record, 1 domain, 1 matching projectorphans.org, and 100.0% official-domain rate.

Email domain intelligence

2 of 8 visible email signals match projectorphans.org.

Mixed-domain coverage: Visible email signals include official-domain and non-official domains.
Email identity evidence tier: Corroborated email identity evidence. Email identity evidence combines 8 visible email signals, 2 matching projectorphans.org, 1 person with official-domain email, 25.0% official-domain match, 4 other-domain signals, and 2 personal-domain signals.
25.0% domain match 1 person with official-domain email 6 non-official email signals
Top email pattern: first at 100.0% of matched patterns.
Format example: [first]@projectorphans.org
Dominant pattern: One email pattern accounts for most matched examples.
Email pattern evidence tier: High-confidence email pattern evidence. Email pattern evidence combines 1 matched pattern, 100.0% top-pattern share, and format example for projectorphans.org.
first 100.0%

Explore related pages

Project Orphans email format Project Orphans management graph

Related company intelligence:

2 of 4 visible Project Orphans profiles include email or phone signals. Review people graph
The strongest Project Orphans email pattern signal is [first] , representing 100.0% of matched email-pattern evidence in the AeroLeads company graph.
In total, AeroLeads has detected 1 aggregate email-pattern signals for Project Orphans. View the detailed email format page .

Project Orphans Email Pattern Intelligence Snapshot

These aggregate patterns support the company intelligence page. The dedicated email-format workflow lives on Project Orphans email format .

Observed pattern
Example pattern
[first]
[first]@projectorphans.org
100%

Project Orphans Questions

Project Orphans people graph sample