QUALITY CONCEPT
Company intelligence Management

QUALITY CONCEPT Company Intelligence, Employees & Contact Signals

Contact coverage
Email-led
Visible profile or company source data is strongest for email outreach. 2 visible profiles include direct contact evidence.
People graph depth
4 signals
Moderate profile graph across 3 mapped departments.
Account research
6 steps
Account research checklist combines person-level contact coverage, buying-committee coverage, ICP fit, technology workforce evidence, related-company graph, and domain trust; raw contact values are hidden.
Technology talent
2
Technology-oriented role signals in the workforce graph.
Evidence quality 100/100 Priority intelligence record

AeroLeads company intelligence

QUALITY CONCEPT workforce and contactability signals

Evidence from AeroLeads company records, matched professional profiles, and related company graph.

High confidence
Intelligence completeness
Strong intelligence record
8 of 11 major intelligence groups are available for this company.
Largest mapped team
Sales
1 profile signals in Sales.
Departments mapped
3
Workforce composition from AeroLeads profile data.
Profile graph
Moderate profile graph
4 mapped workforce signals against a 21 employee size estimate.
Top seniority band
Individual contributor
3 of 7 classified profile signals.
Visible contact sample
2
Displayed people with email or phone data.
Technology talent
1
Technology roles and departments found in workforce signals.

Profile graph researchability

Visible people graph includes 8 visible people: 8 named, 7 titled, 7 located, and 2 contactable.

Multi-signal profile graph
Profile coverage evidence tier: Moderate profile coverage evidence. Profile coverage evidence combines 4 mapped workforce signals, 21 employee size estimate, and 19.0% profile graph coverage.
Corroborated profile graph evidence: Researchability is based on 8 visible people with 4 populated evidence dimensions: named, titled, located, and contactable signals.
Profile association confidence: Profile association sample. Association confidence combines 7 titled profiles and 2 contactable profiles.
People
8
Named
8
Titled
7
Located
7
Contactable
2

Data methodology

AeroLeads renders only source-backed fields for this company page.

5 source groups
Company record Matched profile graph Email-pattern aggregate Related company graph Company signal fields
Blank source fields are omitted
Related companies are ordered deterministically
Structured data uses aggregate counts only

Intelligence completeness

8 of 11 major intelligence groups are available for this company.

8 / 11 groups
Strong intelligence record 72.7%
Workforce composition Contactability Email intelligence Decision makers Buying committee Technology talent Domain confidence Market and peer context

Evidence quality

This page clears the 60+ AeroLeads company-intelligence evidence threshold.

100 / 100
Priority intelligence record Threshold 60+
Workforce composition Employee email coverage Department seniority map Business function mix Functional team estimates Functional coverage gap
Workforce graph
22 signals
Workforce composition, Department seniority map, Business function mix
Contactability
7 signals
Employee email coverage, Contact channel mix, Contact data safety guardrail
Source trust
12 signals
Functional team estimates, Functional coverage gap, Domain confidence
Decision-maker intelligence
8 signals
Decision-maker coverage, Leadership signals, Department leadership coverage
Technology intelligence
1 signal
Technology talent
Market and peer context
13 signals
Related company graph, Peer graph strength, Peer position benchmark
Company momentum
3 signals
Company signal breadth, Company momentum score, Company ownership signal
60 additional source-backed evidence signals are counted in this page quality score.

Prospecting readiness

QUALITY CONCEPT shows actionable prospecting fit based on person-level contact coverage, decision-maker coverage, technology workforce evidence, and people graph depth.

70 / 100
Actionable prospecting fit High-confidence prospecting evidence

Prospecting evidence combines person-level contact coverage, decision-maker coverage, technology workforce evidence, people graph depth, and peer context; raw contact values are hidden.

ICP fit
Strong ICP fit

ICP fit combines company size, market specificity, contactability, buying committee, and technology path; raw contact values are hidden.

80 / 100
Company size
21 employees
Employee estimate is in a common outbound prospecting range.
Market specificity
Tagged market profile
2 category and specialty signals in the company record.
Reachability
Mapped contact-channel evidence
Visible profile or company source data is strongest for email outreach.
Buying committee
Mapped buying committee
Mapped decision-maker signals span 1 business function.
Technology path
Mapped technology evidence
2 matched technology role signals found in the workforce graph.
Account research checklist
Multi-step account research checklist

Account research checklist combines person-level contact coverage, buying-committee coverage, ICP fit, technology workforce evidence, related-company graph, and domain trust; raw contact values are hidden.

6 steps
Confirm contact coverage
Mapped contact-channel evidence
Visible profile or company source data is strongest for email outreach.
Map reachable buying committee
Mapped buying committee
Buying-committee evidence combines 1 mapped buying-committee function, 1 contactable function, and Executive / corporate function coverage.
Validate ICP fit
Strong ICP fit
ICP fit combines company size, market specificity, contactability, buying committee, and technology path; raw contact values are hidden.
Review technology path
Mapped technology evidence
2 matched technology role signals found in the workforce graph.
Compare related peers
Limited peer comparison
Compares this company with related-company evidence across employee scale and peer graph evidence.
Check domain trust
Mixed domain alignment
Domain evidence combines website domain and social profile; raw email addresses are hidden.
Contact coverage
Mapped contact-channel evidence
Visible profile or company source data is strongest for email outreach.
Decision-maker coverage
Mapped buying committee
Mapped decision-maker signals span 1 business function.
Technology contact path
Mapped technology evidence
2 matched technology role signals found in the workforce graph.
People graph depth
Moderate profile graph
4 mapped workforce signals against a 21 employee size estimate.

Domain trust signals

Domain confidence for qualityconcept.in is based on website domain and social profile.

35 / 100
Mixed domain alignment Limited domain evidence

Domain evidence combines website domain and social profile; raw email addresses are hidden.

Website domain
qualityconcept.in
The official website domain is available from the company source record.
Social profile
LinkedIn organization page
A LinkedIn organization page is present for this company record.
Employee email mismatch: Visible employee email signals do not match the official domain.

AeroLeads coverage snapshot

Profile sample
4
Visible people attached to this company page.
Profile graph depth
Moderate profile graph
4 mapped workforce signals against a 21 employee size estimate.
Contactable sample
2
Visible people with email or phone data.
Contact channel mix
Email-led contact coverage
Visible profile or company source data is strongest for email outreach.
Contact evidence confidence
Mapped contact-channel evidence
Visible profile or company source data is strongest for email outreach.
Department coverage
3
Departments represented in AeroLeads workforce signals.
Department concentration
Multi-department workforce
Mapped workforce signals span 3 departments, led by General.
Leadership signals
2
Department lead or leadership signals in the org data.
Department leader sample
Limited department leader sample
AeroLeads source data includes 2 leadership signals across 2 departments; rows show titles and contact-channel presence only.
Department leadership coverage
Broad department leadership coverage
Leadership signals appear across 2 of 3 mapped departments.
Leadership density
50
Percent of mapped department signals that are leadership signals.
Department seniority map
Multi-department seniority map
Visible department samples map 4 seniority-classified profiles across 3 departments and 3 seniority bands.
Technology talent
2
Visible profiles matching technology role patterns.
Technology evidence confidence
Mapped technology evidence
2 matched technology role signals found in the workforce graph.
Technology department signals
1
Mapped department profile signals in technology-oriented teams.
Email domain confidence
Non-official email coverage
Visible email signals use non-official domains only.
Domain confidence
Mixed domain alignment
Domain confidence for qualityconcept.in is based on website domain and social profile.
Contact data safety
Limited privacy-safe contact intelligence
AeroLeads exposes contact counts, channel mix, freshness, and domain-alignment evidence while hiding raw email addresses and masking phone numbers in public output.
Company signal breadth
Two-signal company record
Company-level signals include social audience and ownership.
Company momentum score
Limited company momentum score
Momentum score blends contactability and peer position from AeroLeads company and profile evidence.
Company ownership signal
Public company record
Company source record includes source type Public Company.
Audience density
Low audience density
104 followers against 21 employee estimate, about 5 followers per estimated employee.
Specialty signals
1
Specialty tags in the company record.
Market specificity
Tagged market profile
2 category and specialty signals in the company record.
Peer industry clusters
8
Industries represented by related company records.
Related companies
10
Company graph links available for comparison.
Industry benchmark
Peer-informed industry benchmark
Industry benchmark uses 10 related companies, 3 benchmark dimensions, and 3 peer evidence types from the AeroLeads related-company graph.
Peer benchmark confidence
Multi-signal peer benchmark evidence
Peer benchmark combines 10 related companies with peer graph strength, size benchmark, and size position. Underlying peer graph includes 3 evidence types: employee benchmarks, website records, social profiles.
Peer position benchmark
Employee-scale peer position benchmark
Peer-position benchmark shows employee scale above 66.7% of 6 comparable related peers.
Peer comparison matrix
Limited peer comparison
Compares this company with related-company evidence across employee scale and peer graph evidence.
Workforce locations
6
Locations represented in visible profile signals.
Workforce distribution
Distributed workforce
Visible profile location signals are spread across 6 locations.
Workforce location footprint
Multi-country workforce footprint
Visible profile locations span 6 cities across 3 countries, led by Noida.
Workforce distribution model
International distributed workforce model
Visible profile locations span 3 countries and 6 workforce locations; no single hub exceeds 28% of visible location signals.
Workforce geography evidence confidence
Corroborated workforce geography evidence
Workforce geography spans 6 locations across 7 visible profile signals, with reachable evidence across 2 locations. Top workforce hub differs from company location.
Contactable workforce locations
2
Workforce locations represented by visible contact samples.
Top contactable workforce location
Darien, Illinois, United States
Visible contact samples span 2 workforce locations, led by Darien, Illinois, United States.
Workforce seniority tiers
4
Seniority bands derived from visible profile titles and levels.
Seniority evidence confidence
Corroborated seniority evidence
Seniority graph spans 7 classified profile signals across 4 tiers, with reachable evidence for 2. Contributor-heavy visible sample.
Classified seniority profiles
7
Visible profiles with usable seniority signals.
Management-to-IC proxy
Contributor-heavy visible sample
2 managerial seniority signals and 5 contributor signals appear in the visible seniority-classified sample.
Role title diversity
Diverse role title sample
7 distinct role titles across 7 visible titled profiles.
Visible role titles
7
Distinct role titles found in visible profile signals.
Business function mix
Mixed business-function workforce sample
AeroLeads maps 3 visible profile signals into 2 business functions; 1 include visible contact data.
Mapped business functions
2
Business functions inferred from visible profile titles and departments.
Functional team estimates
Engineering team estimate
AeroLeads derives 2 visible engineering team profile signals from mapped business-function signals.
Functional coverage gaps
Limited function coverage map
Visible people signals cover 1 of 8 core business functions. Not observed in the visible graph: Sales / revenue, Marketing / growth, Product / design, and People / HR. Treat this as a coverage gap, not confirmed absence.
Contactable role titles
2
Distinct role titles with visible contact samples.
Contactable role coverage
Mixed contactable role coverage
2 reachable role titles, led by Author/union Trade/owner Aqc Computer at 50.0% of contactable titled profiles.
Decision-maker signals
4
Visible profiles matching seniority or leadership title patterns.
Decision-maker reachability
Partial decision-maker reachability
Some mapped decision-maker signals include visible contact data.
Buying committee evidence confidence
Mapped buying committee
Mapped decision-maker signals span 1 business function.
Buyer persona availability
Single-persona buyer availability
Mapped decision-maker evidence covers Executive buyer; 1 of 1 buyer persona include visible contact data.
Decision-maker contactability rate
50
Percent of mapped decision-maker signals with visible contact data.
Prospecting fit
Actionable prospecting fit
QUALITY CONCEPT shows actionable prospecting fit based on person-level contact coverage, decision-maker coverage, technology workforce evidence, and people graph depth.
ICP fit
Strong ICP fit
QUALITY CONCEPT matches the strong ICP fit band for common outbound filters based on company size, market specificity, contactability, buying committee, and technology path.
Account research checklist
Multi-step account research checklist
Account research checklist combines person-level contact coverage, buying-committee coverage, ICP fit, technology workforce evidence, related-company graph, and domain trust; raw contact values are hidden.
Intelligence signal groups
20
AeroLeads signal groups available for this company.

Market focus signals

Primary industry
Industrial Machinery Manufacturing
Market specificity
Tagged market profile
2 category and specialty signals in the company record.
Market evidence tier
High-confidence market evidence
Market evidence combines 7 classification signals from categories, specialties, related peer industries, and description keywords. 6 description-backed keyword signals are included.
Industry benchmark
Peer-informed industry benchmark
Industry benchmark uses 10 related companies, 3 benchmark dimensions, and 3 peer evidence types from the AeroLeads related-company graph.
Top peer industry
Manufacturing
22% of 10 related peer industry signals.
Peer benchmark evidence
Multi-signal peer benchmark evidence
Peer benchmark combines 10 related companies with peer graph strength, size benchmark, and size position. Underlying peer graph includes 3 evidence types: employee benchmarks, website records, social profiles.
Size position
Larger than most related peers
4 of 6 related employee-estimated peers are lower.
Peer graph strength
Partial peer evidence graph
Related peer graph has employee benchmarks, website records, and social profiles across 10 related companies.
Benchmark dimensions: peer graph strength, size benchmark, and size position.
Categories
Industrial Machinery Manufacturing
Specialties
i.e. Training & certifications
Product-market keyword evidence
Description-backed market keywords
Keyword evidence comes from 3 source field groups: Category, Specialty, Description.
Product-market keyword evidence tier: High-confidence product-market keyword evidence. Product-market keyword evidence combines 8 unique market keywords, 3 source field groups, and 6 description-backed keywords (1 category, 1 specialty, and 6 description).
Industrial Machinery Manufacturing · Category i.e. Training & certifications · Specialty have three divisions · Description training certifications inspection · Description welding consultancy inspection · Description third party inspection · Description engineering inspection expediting · Description different industries · Description
Related peer industries
Peer-industry evidence tier: High-confidence peer-industry evidence. Peer-industry evidence combines 9 related companies, 5 peer-industry clusters, and top peer industry Manufacturing at 22.2%.
Functional coverage gaps
Limited function coverage map
Visible people signals cover 1 of 8 core business functions. Not observed in the visible graph: Sales / revenue, Marketing / growth, Product / design, and People / HR. Treat this as a coverage gap, not confirmed absence.
Transparent function coverage evidence: Function coverage evidence combines observed functions Technology / data and 7 unobserved core functions in the visible graph.
Manufacturing 2 peers
22.2% of related peer industries
Renewable Energy Equipment Manufacturing 1 peer
11.1% of related peer industries
Hospitals and Health Care 1 peer
11.1% of related peer industries
Boilers, Tanks, and Shipping Container Manufacturing 1 peer
11.1% of related peer industries
Utilities 1 peer
11.1% of related peer industries

Company signals

Company signal breadth
Two-signal company record
Company-level signals include social audience and ownership.
Corroborated company record evidence: Company record evidence combines 2 source-backed company signal types: social audience and ownership.
Social audience
104
Followers in the company source record.
Social audience evidence tier: Limited social-audience evidence. Social audience evidence uses 104 followers from source field social_followers.
Audience density
Low audience density
104 followers against 21 employee estimate, about 5 followers per estimated employee.
Audience-density evidence tier: Limited audience-density evidence. Audience-density evidence combines 104 social followers, 21 employee estimate, and 5 followers per estimated employee.
Company ownership
Public company record
Company source record includes source type Public Company.
Company ownership evidence tier: Structured ownership evidence. Ownership evidence combines source type Public Company from structured company source fields.

Workforce composition

Department concentration
Multi-department workforce
Mapped workforce signals span 3 departments, led by General. 50.0% of mapped department signals are in the largest department.
Department concentration evidence tier: Multi-department concentration evidence. Department concentration evidence combines 3 mapped departments, top department General, and 50.0% top-department share.
Department leadership coverage
Broad department leadership coverage
Leadership signals appear across 2 of 3 mapped departments. Leadership signals represent 50.0% of mapped department signals.
Department leadership evidence tier: Corroborated department leadership evidence. Department leadership evidence combines 2 leadership signals, 2 of 3 mapped departments, and 50.0% leadership density.
Department seniority map
Multi-department seniority map
Visible department samples map 4 seniority-classified profiles across 3 departments and 3 seniority bands.
Department seniority evidence tier: Corroborated department seniority evidence. Department seniority evidence combines 4 seniority-classified profiles, 3 departments, 3 seniority bands, and top cell Sales + Manager with 1 profile.
General 2 profiles
Senior / Lead: 1 Individual contributor: 1
IT 1 profile
Individual contributor: 1
Sales 1 profile
Manager: 1
2 leadership signals
Department leader sample
Limited department leader sample
0 contactable

AeroLeads source data includes 2 leadership signals across 2 departments; rows show titles and contact-channel presence only.

Department leader evidence tier: Corroborated department leader evidence. Department leader evidence combines 2 leadership signals and 2 departments; raw contacts are hidden.
Leader Department Seniority Channel
Arun Kumar
Account Manager at Quality Concept
 Sales Manager No visible contact channel
Vijay Kumar Prabha
Cswip 3.1, Asnt Level-ii in Ut, Mt, Pt, Rt, Rtfi & Vt, Certified Inspector Pressure
 General Senior / Lead No visible contact channel
General 2 signals
50.0% of mapped department signals, 1 leadership signals
Sales 1 signals
25.0% of mapped department signals, 1 leadership signals
IT 1 signals
25.0% of mapped department signals

Technology talent signals

2 matched technology role signals.

Technology evidence tier
Mapped technology evidence
2 matched technology role signals found in the workforce graph.
1 IT department signals
Engineering 2 profiles
100.0% of matched technology role signals
Matched role examples
Inspection Engineer 1
Qa/qc Engineer, Inspection Engineer, Ndt Level-ii( Ut, Rt, Vt, Mpt, Dpt) 1

Workforce seniority mix

Aggregated from 7 classified profile signals.

Largest seniority band
Individual contributor
3 of 7 classified profile signals.
Corroborated seniority evidence: Seniority graph spans 7 classified profile signals across 4 tiers, with reachable evidence for 2. Contributor-heavy visible sample.
Management-to-IC proxy
Contributor-heavy visible sample
28.6%
managerial seniority signals
71.4%
contributor seniority signals
2 managerial seniority signals and 5 contributor signals appear in the visible seniority-classified sample.
Management-shape evidence tier: Contributor-heavy management-shape evidence. Management-shape evidence combines 7 seniority-classified signals, 2 managerial signals, 28.6% managerial share, and 5 contributor signals.
Individual contributor 3 profiles
42.9% of classified seniority signals
Senior / Lead 2 profiles
28.6% of classified seniority signals, 1 with visible contact data
Executive 1 profile
14.3% of classified seniority signals, 1 with visible contact data
Manager 1 profile
14.3% of classified seniority signals

Workforce geography

Aggregated from 7 visible profile location signals.

Workforce geography evidence
Corroborated workforce geography evidence
Workforce geography spans 6 locations across 7 visible profile signals, with reachable evidence across 2 locations. Top workforce hub differs from company location.
Distribution signal
Distributed workforce
Visible profile location signals are spread across 6 locations.
Workforce distribution model
International distributed workforce model
Visible profile locations span 3 countries and 6 workforce locations; no single hub exceeds 28% of visible location signals.
Corroborated workforce model evidence: Workforce model evidence combines 7 located profile signals, 6 workforce locations, 6 cities, 3 countries, top hub Noida, Uttar Pradesh, India at 28%, company-location alignment, and 2 reachable locations.
Locations
6
Countries
3
Top hub share
28%
Workforce location footprint
Multi-country workforce footprint
Visible profile locations span 6 cities across 3 countries, led by Noida.
Cities
6
Countries
3
Company-location alignment
Top workforce hub differs from company location
The largest visible workforce location is Noida, Uttar Pradesh, India, while the company location is Zeta-i, In.
Top workforce hub share: 28.6%
Company-location evidence tier: Workforce-location divergence evidence. Company-location alignment evidence combines company location Zeta-i, In, top workforce hub Noida, Uttar Pradesh, India, 28.6% top workforce hub share, and location difference.
Contactable location spread
Multi-location contact coverage
Visible contact samples span 2 workforce locations, led by Darien, Illinois, United States.
Contactable location evidence tier: Multi-location contactable evidence. Contactable location evidence combines 2 contactable profile location signals, 2 workforce locations, top contactable hub Darien, Illinois, United States at 50.0%, and company-location alignment.
Contactable workforce hub differs from company location: The largest contactable workforce location is Darien, Illinois, United States, while the company location is Zeta-i, In. Top contactable hub share: 50.0%.
Darien, Illinois, United States 1 contact
50.0% of contactable location signals
Greater Barcelona Metropolitan Area, Spain 1 contact
50.0% of contactable location signals
Noida, Uttar Pradesh, India 2 profiles
28.6% of visible location signals
Darien, Illinois, United States 1 profile
14.3% of visible location signals
Ernakulam, Kerala, India 1 profile
14.3% of visible location signals
Greater Barcelona Metropolitan Area, Spain 1 profile
14.3% of visible location signals
Delhi, India 1 profile
14.3% of visible location signals
Pune, Maharashtra, India 1 profile
14.3% of visible location signals

Decision-maker coverage

4 seniority signals, 2 with visible contact data.

Decision-maker evidence tier
Mapped decision-maker evidence
Decision-maker evidence covers 4 seniority signals, 2 reachable. Buying committee spans 1 function.
Account planning snapshot
Focused account planning snapshot
Snapshot combines department reachability, decision-maker coverage, and buying-committee function aggregates.
2 account-planning evidence cards available.
Account planning evidence tier: Corroborated account planning evidence. Account planning evidence combines 2 aggregate account-planning cards, 1 reachable buying-committee function, and Senior / Lead seniority reachability; raw contacts are hidden.
Reachable buying committee
1 of 1 functions
Reachable functions include Executive / corporate.
Most reachable seniority
Senior / Lead
1 of 2 signals in this seniority band include visible contact data.
Partial decision-maker reachability 50.0%
Some mapped decision-maker signals include visible contact data.
Decision-maker reachability evidence tier: Partial decision-maker reachability evidence. Decision-maker reachability evidence combines 2 contactable decision-maker signals, 4 mapped decision-maker signals, and 50.0% contactability.
Email-led decision-maker coverage: Mapped decision-maker contact data is strongest for email, with 2 email signals.
Buying committee function coverage
Single-function buying-committee coverage
1 of 1 mapped functions include visible decision-maker contact data.
Mapped buying committee: Mapped decision-maker signals span 1 business function.
Buying committee evidence tier: Mapped buying-committee evidence. Buying-committee evidence combines 1 mapped buying-committee function, 1 contactable function, and Executive / corporate function coverage.
Buyer persona availability: Single-persona buyer availability. Mapped decision-maker evidence covers Executive buyer; 1 of 1 buyer persona include visible contact data. Reachable buyer persona evidence: Buyer persona evidence combines 1 mapped buyer persona, 1 contactable persona, and Executive buyer coverage.
Executive / corporate: 1 contactable
Most reachable seniority
Senior / Lead
1 of 2 seniority signals include visible contact data.
Seniority reachability evidence tier: Mapped seniority reachability evidence. Seniority reachability evidence combines 1 contactable Senior / Lead signal, 2 Senior / Lead signals, 50.0% tier contactability, and email coverage.
Senior / Lead 2 profiles
50.0% of mapped seniority signals, 1 with visible contact data
Executive 1 profile
25.0% of mapped seniority signals, 1 with visible contact data
Manager 1 profile
25.0% of mapped seniority signals

Role and function mix

7 visible titled profiles across 7 distinct role titles.

Title mix
Diverse role title sample
7 distinct role titles across 7 visible titled profiles.
Role-title evidence tier: Diverse role-title evidence. Role-title diversity evidence combines 7 visible titled profiles, 7 distinct role titles, and top title Account Manager at Quality Concept at 14.3%.
Business function mix
Mixed business-function workforce sample
AeroLeads maps 3 visible profile signals into 2 business functions; 1 include visible contact data.
Business-function evidence tier: Corroborated business-function evidence. Business-function evidence combines 3 mapped function profile signals, 2 business functions, 1 contactable signal, 1 contactable function, and top function Technology / data at 66.7%.
Single-function contactability map 1 / 2 functions
1 of 2 mapped business functions include visible contact data.
Functional team estimates
Engineering team estimate
AeroLeads derives 2 visible engineering team profile signals from mapped business-function signals.
Mapped functional team evidence: Functional team estimate evidence combines 2 visible engineering team profile signals.
Engineering team estimate 2 profiles
66.7% of mapped function signals; Technology / data
Technology / data 2 profiles
66.7% of mapped function signals
Executive / corporate 1 profile
33.3% of mapped function signals, 1 with visible contact data
Contactable role coverage
Mixed contactable role coverage
2 reachable role titles, led by Author/union Trade/owner Aqc Computer at 50.0% of contactable titled profiles.
Contactable role evidence tier: Corroborated contactable role evidence. Contactable role evidence combines 2 contactable titled profiles, 2 reachable role titles, and top reachable role Author/union Trade/owner Aqc Computer at 50.0%.
Role title reachability
Partial role-title reachability
2 of 7 distinct visible role titles include email or phone signals.
Role-title reachability evidence tier: Corroborated role-title reachability evidence. Role-title reachability evidence combines 7 visible role titles, 2 reachable titles, and 28.6% title reachability.
Account Manager at Quality Concept 1 profile
14.3% of visible titled profiles
Author/union Trade/owner Aqc Computer 1 profile
14.3% of visible titled profiles
Cswip 3.1, Asnt Level-ii in Ut, Mt, Pt, Rt, Rtfi & Vt, Certified Inspector Pressure 1 profile
14.3% of visible titled profiles
Independent Senior Researcher - Pharma 1 profile
14.3% of visible titled profiles
Inspection Engineer 1 profile
14.3% of visible titled profiles
Qa/qc Engineer, Inspection Engineer, Ndt Level-ii( Ut, Rt, Vt, Mpt, Dpt) 1 profile
14.3% of visible titled profiles

Contactability signals

Contactability score 50.0%
2 of 4 visible profiles include email or phone signals.
Contact channel mix
Email-led contact coverage
Visible profile or company source data is strongest for email outreach.
Contact evidence tier
Mapped contact-channel evidence
Visible profile or company source data is strongest for email outreach.
Contact data safety
Limited privacy-safe contact intelligence
AeroLeads exposes contact counts, channel mix, freshness, and domain-alignment evidence while hiding raw email addresses and masking phone numbers in public output.
Aggregate signals
2
Channel coverage
Email aggregate coverage
Evidence groups
1
Limited contact-safety evidence: Contact-safety evidence combines visible profile contact sample; public schema uses aggregate variables only.
Aggregate-only contact schema: Dataset variables use counts, rates, channel labels, freshness bands, and domain-alignment metrics instead of raw contact values.
Visible people
4
With contact data
2
Email coverage
2
50.0% of visible profiles

Email domain intelligence

0 of 3 visible email signals match qualityconcept.in.

Non-official email coverage: Visible email signals use non-official domains only.
Email identity evidence tier: Non-official email identity evidence. Email identity evidence combines 3 visible email signals, 1 other-domain signal, and 2 personal-domain signals.
0.0% domain match 0 people with official-domain email 3 non-official email signals

Explore related pages

QUALITY CONCEPT management graph

Related company intelligence:

ABOUT US QUALITY CONCEPT is a group of engineering services, we have three divisions of our services i.e. Training & certifications, Inspection & testing and Welding consultancy. INSPECTION & TESTING We serves for Third Party Inspection i.e. Engineering Inspection, Expediting, Pre-shipment Inspection & Vendor evaluation audit of different industries. Also we serve for Non Destructive testing using NDT method i.e. Ultrasonic testing, Magnetic particle testing, Dye Penetrant testing, Visual testing, PMI, Thickness gauging & Hardness testing. TRAINING & CERTIFICATION We offers NDT Level-II (UT, MT, PT, RT & VT) training & certification as per SNT – TC-1A, CSWIP 3.1 Preparatory, Certified QA/QC Engineer, Certified Inspection Engineer, Welder’s training & certification, Fitter’s training & certification, Technical workshops on WPS/PQR qualifications, Welder qualification, Welding imperfections, Destructive & Nondestructive testing . WELDING CONSULTANCY We provides consultancy for WPS/PQR & WPQ qualification, quality control, cost reduction, selection of suitable welding / cutting process, selection of welding consumable, failure analysis, welding customization, welding documentation & records accordance with international code & standard.

Company source details

Employees
21
Address
Zeta-i, In
Industry
Industrial Machinery Manufacturing
NAICS
Industrial Machinery Manufacturing
Food Product Machinery Manufacturing
Semiconductor Machinery Manufacturing
Sawmill, Woodworking, and Paper Machinery Manufacturing
Printing Machinery and Equipment Manufacturing
Other Industrial Machinery Manufacturing
Website
qualityconcept.in
Keywords
i.e. Training & certifications.
HQ
Greater Noida, UP
Related companies
PIXON, SOUTH-WEST MINING LIMITED, DiamondBlue Shipping Solutions Pvt. Ltd - India, QUALITY CONCEPT WELDING SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED, Stainlay India, India Quality Control, CTS SERVICE LTD (a 3rd party product quality pre-shipment on-site inspection company in China), Diamond Blue Shipping Solutions Private Limited, QUALITY CONCEPT PVT LTD, Welding Accessories & Suppliers.
Explore visible people signals for QUALITY CONCEPT by role, title, or keyword.

2 of 4 visible profiles include email or phone signals in AeroLeads.

QUALITY CONCEPT Questions

QUALITY CONCEPT people graph sample