The Rinx

The Rinx Company Intelligence, Employees & Contact Signals

Contact coverage
Email + phone
Visible profile or company source data includes email and phone channels. 2 visible profiles include direct contact evidence.
People graph depth
26 signals
Deep profile graph across 4 mapped departments.
Account research
6 steps
Account research checklist combines person-level contact coverage, ICP fit, technology workforce evidence, related-company graph, domain trust, and people graph depth; raw contact values are hidden.
Technology talent
1
Technology-oriented role signals in the workforce graph.
Evidence quality 100/100 Priority intelligence record

AeroLeads company intelligence

The Rinx workforce and contactability signals

Evidence from AeroLeads company records, matched professional profiles, and related company graph.

High confidence
Intelligence completeness
Partial intelligence record
6 of 11 major intelligence groups are available for this company.
Largest mapped team
IT
3 profile signals in IT.
Departments mapped
4
Workforce composition from AeroLeads profile data.
Profile graph
Deep profile graph
26 mapped workforce signals against a 82 employee size estimate.
Top reachable team
General
2 visible contact signals.
Top seniority band
Individual contributor
9 of 13 classified profile signals.
Visible contact sample
2
Displayed people with email or phone data.

Profile graph researchability

Visible people graph includes 13 visible people: 13 named, 13 titled, 12 located, and 3 contactable.

Multi-signal profile graph
Profile coverage evidence tier: Deep profile coverage evidence. Profile coverage evidence combines 26 mapped workforce signals, 82 employee size estimate, and 31.7% profile graph coverage.
High-confidence profile graph evidence: Researchability is based on 13 visible people with 4 populated evidence dimensions: named, titled, located, and contactable signals.
Profile association confidence: Profile association sample. Association confidence combines 13 titled profiles and 3 contactable profiles.
People
13
Named
13
Titled
13
Located
12
Contactable
3

Data methodology

AeroLeads renders only source-backed fields for this company page.

5 source groups
Company record Matched profile graph Email-pattern aggregate Related company graph Company signal fields
Blank source fields are omitted
Related companies are ordered deterministically
Structured data uses aggregate counts only

Intelligence completeness

6 of 11 major intelligence groups are available for this company.

6 / 11 groups
Partial intelligence record 54.5%
Workforce composition Contactability Email intelligence Technology talent Domain confidence Market and peer context

Evidence quality

This page clears the 60+ AeroLeads company-intelligence evidence threshold.

100 / 100
Priority intelligence record Threshold 60+
Workforce composition Employee email coverage Employee phone coverage Department contactability Department seniority map Role title reachability
Workforce graph
20 signals
Workforce composition, Department contactability, Department seniority map
Contactability
11 signals
Employee email coverage, Employee phone coverage, Email pattern intelligence
Technology intelligence
1 signal
Technology talent
Market and peer context
13 signals
Related company graph, Peer graph strength, Peer position benchmark
Company momentum
3 signals
Company signal breadth, Company momentum score, Company ownership signal
Source trust
7 signals
Domain confidence, Intelligence completeness, Company description
Decision-maker intelligence
3 signals
Leadership signals, Department leadership coverage, Account research checklist
52 additional source-backed evidence signals are counted in this page quality score.

Prospecting readiness

The Rinx shows research-first prospecting fit based on person-level contact coverage, technology workforce evidence, people graph depth, and peer context.

45 / 100
Research-first prospecting fit Corroborated prospecting evidence

Prospecting evidence combines person-level contact coverage, technology workforce evidence, people graph depth, and peer context; raw contact values are hidden.

ICP fit
Qualified ICP fit

ICP fit combines company size, market specificity, contactability, technology path, and domain trust; raw contact values are hidden.

70 / 100
Company size
82 employees
Employee estimate is in a common outbound prospecting range.
Market specificity
Focused market profile
16 market classification signals across categories, specialties, and related peer industries.
Reachability
Mapped contact-channel evidence
Visible profile or company source data includes email and phone channels.
Technology path
Mapped technology evidence
1 matched technology role signal found in the workforce graph.
Domain trust
Mixed domain alignment
Domain evidence combines website domain, social profile, and company email sample; raw email addresses are hidden.
Account research checklist
Multi-step account research checklist

Account research checklist combines person-level contact coverage, ICP fit, technology workforce evidence, related-company graph, domain trust, and people graph depth; raw contact values are hidden.

6 steps
Confirm contact coverage
Mapped contact-channel evidence
Visible profile or company source data includes email and phone channels.
Validate ICP fit
Qualified ICP fit
ICP fit combines company size, market specificity, contactability, technology path, and domain trust; raw contact values are hidden.
Review technology path
Mapped technology evidence
1 matched technology role signal found in the workforce graph.
Compare related peers
Limited peer comparison
Compares this company with related-company evidence across employee scale and peer graph evidence.
Check domain trust
Mixed domain alignment
Domain evidence combines website domain, social profile, and company email sample; raw email addresses are hidden.
Review people graph depth
Deep profile graph
26 mapped workforce signals against a 82 employee size estimate.
Contact coverage
Mapped contact-channel evidence
Visible profile or company source data includes email and phone channels.
Technology contact path
Mapped technology evidence
1 matched technology role signal found in the workforce graph.
People graph depth
Deep profile graph
26 mapped workforce signals against a 82 employee size estimate.
Peer context
Multi-signal peer benchmark evidence
Peer benchmark combines 10 related companies with peer graph strength, size benchmark, and size position. Underlying peer graph includes 3 evidence types: employee benchmarks, website records, social profiles.
Decision-maker evidence missing: No mapped decision-maker cluster is strong enough to summarize.

Domain trust signals

Domain confidence for therinx.com is based on website domain, social profile, and company email sample.

45 / 100
Mixed domain alignment Corroborated domain evidence

Domain evidence combines website domain, social profile, and company email sample; raw email addresses are hidden.

Website domain
therinx.com
The official website domain is available from the company source record.
Social profile
LinkedIn organization page
A LinkedIn organization page is present for this company record.
Company email sample
1 official-domain source email records
Company-level email source records include official-domain coverage; raw addresses are hidden.
Employee email mismatch: Visible employee email signals do not match the official domain.

AeroLeads coverage snapshot

Profile sample
4
Visible people attached to this company page.
Profile graph depth
Deep profile graph
26 mapped workforce signals against a 82 employee size estimate.
Contactable sample
2
Visible people with email or phone data.
Contact channel mix
Multi-channel contact coverage
Visible profile or company source data includes email and phone channels.
Contact evidence confidence
Mapped contact-channel evidence
Visible profile or company source data includes email and phone channels.
Department coverage
4
Departments represented in AeroLeads workforce signals.
Department concentration
Department-concentrated workforce
Most mapped workforce signals are in General.
Leadership signals
1
Department lead or leadership signals in the org data.
Department leadership coverage
Focused department leadership coverage
Leadership signals appear in 1 of 4 mapped departments.
Leadership density
3.80
Percent of mapped department signals that are leadership signals.
Department contact coverage
1
Departments with visible contact samples.
Department contact spread
Focused department contact spread
Visible contact samples appear in 1 of 4 mapped departments.
Department seniority map
Multi-department seniority map
Visible department samples map 10 seniority-classified profiles across 4 departments and 2 seniority bands.
Technology talent
1
Visible profiles matching technology role patterns.
Technology evidence confidence
Mapped technology evidence
1 matched technology role signal found in the workforce graph.
Technology department signals
3
Mapped department profile signals in technology-oriented teams.
Email-pattern variants
1
Distinct matched business email patterns.
Email domain confidence
Non-official email coverage
Visible email signals use non-official domains only.
Domain confidence
Mixed domain alignment
Domain confidence for therinx.com is based on website domain, social profile, and company email sample.
Contact data safety
Corroborated privacy-safe contact intelligence
AeroLeads exposes contact counts, channel mix, freshness, and domain-alignment evidence while hiding raw email addresses and masking phone numbers in public output.
Company signal breadth
Two-signal company record
Company-level signals include social audience and ownership.
Company momentum score
Limited company momentum score
Momentum score blends contactability and peer position from AeroLeads company and profile evidence.
Company ownership signal
Private company record
Company source record includes source type Privately Held.
Audience density
Low audience density
181 followers against 82 employee estimate, about 2.20 followers per estimated employee.
Specialty signals
10
Specialty tags in the company record.
Market specificity
Focused market profile
16 market classification signals across categories, specialties, and related peer industries.
Peer industry clusters
7
Industries represented by related company records.
Related companies
10
Company graph links available for comparison.
Industry benchmark
Peer-informed industry benchmark
Industry benchmark uses 10 related companies, 3 benchmark dimensions, and 3 peer evidence types from the AeroLeads related-company graph.
Peer benchmark confidence
Multi-signal peer benchmark evidence
Peer benchmark combines 10 related companies with peer graph strength, size benchmark, and size position. Underlying peer graph includes 3 evidence types: employee benchmarks, website records, social profiles.
Peer position benchmark
Employee-scale peer position benchmark
Peer-position benchmark shows employee scale above 80% of 10 comparable related peers.
Peer comparison matrix
Limited peer comparison
Compares this company with related-company evidence across employee scale and peer graph evidence.
Workforce locations
9
Locations represented in visible profile signals.
Workforce distribution
Distributed workforce
Visible profile location signals are spread across 9 locations.
Workforce location footprint
Multi-city workforce footprint
Visible profile locations span 9 cities across 1 country, led by New York City Metropolitan Area.
Workforce distribution model
Broad distributed workforce model
Visible profile locations are spread across 9 workforce locations, with New York City Metropolitan Area, United States as the largest hub at 16%.
Workforce geography evidence confidence
Corroborated workforce geography evidence
Workforce geography spans 9 locations across 12 visible profile signals, with reachable evidence across 3 locations. Top workforce hub shares company country.
Contactable workforce locations
3
Workforce locations represented by visible contact samples.
Top contactable workforce location
Smithtown, New York, United States
Visible contact samples span 3 workforce locations, led by Smithtown, New York, United States.
Workforce seniority tiers
3
Seniority bands derived from visible profile titles and levels.
Seniority evidence confidence
Corroborated seniority evidence
Seniority graph spans 13 classified profile signals across 3 tiers, with reachable evidence for 3. Contributor-heavy visible sample.
Classified seniority profiles
13
Visible profiles with usable seniority signals.
Management-to-IC proxy
Contributor-heavy visible sample
1 managerial seniority signal and 12 contributor signals appear in the visible seniority-classified sample.
Role title diversity
Diverse role title sample
13 distinct role titles across 13 visible titled profiles.
Visible role titles
13
Distinct role titles found in visible profile signals.
Contactable role titles
3
Distinct role titles with visible contact samples.
Contactable role coverage
Diverse contactable role coverage
3 reachable role titles across 3 contactable titled profiles.
Prospecting fit
Research-first prospecting fit
The Rinx shows research-first prospecting fit based on person-level contact coverage, technology workforce evidence, people graph depth, and peer context.
ICP fit
Qualified ICP fit
The Rinx matches the qualified ICP fit band for common outbound filters based on company size, market specificity, contactability, technology path, and domain trust.
Account research checklist
Multi-step account research checklist
Account research checklist combines person-level contact coverage, ICP fit, technology workforce evidence, related-company graph, domain trust, and people graph depth; raw contact values are hidden.
Intelligence signal groups
19
AeroLeads signal groups available for this company.

Market focus signals

Primary industry
Recreational Facilities
Market specificity
Focused market profile
16 market classification signals across categories, specialties, and related peer industries.
Market evidence tier
High-confidence market evidence
Market evidence combines 16 classification signals from categories, specialties, related peer industries, and description keywords. 5 description-backed keyword signals are included.
Industry benchmark
Peer-informed industry benchmark
Industry benchmark uses 10 related companies, 3 benchmark dimensions, and 3 peer evidence types from the AeroLeads related-company graph.
Top peer industry
Hospitals and Health Care
22% of 10 related peer industry signals.
Peer benchmark evidence
Multi-signal peer benchmark evidence
Peer benchmark combines 10 related companies with peer graph strength, size benchmark, and size position. Underlying peer graph includes 3 evidence types: employee benchmarks, website records, social profiles.
Size position
Larger than most related peers
8 of 10 related employee-estimated peers are lower.
Peer graph strength
Partial peer evidence graph
Related peer graph has employee benchmarks, website records, and social profiles across 10 related companies.
Benchmark dimensions: peer graph strength, size benchmark, and size position.
Categories
Recreational Facilities
Specialties
Public Ice Skating Figure Skating Ice Hockey Birthday Parties Swimming Skating Lessons Swimming Lessons Hockey Clinics and Leagues
Product-market keyword evidence
Description-backed market keywords
Keyword evidence comes from 3 source field groups: Category, Specialty, Description.
Product-market keyword evidence tier: High-confidence product-market keyword evidence. Product-market keyword evidence combines 16 unique market keywords, 3 source field groups, and 5 description-backed keywords (1 category, 10 specialty, and 5 description).
Recreational Facilities · Category Public Ice Skating · Specialty Figure Skating · Specialty Ice Hockey · Specialty Birthday Parties · Specialty Swimming · Specialty Skating Lessons · Specialty Swimming Lessons · Specialty Hockey Clinics and Leagues · Specialty Synchronized Skating · Specialty Skate Sharpening · Specialty corporation dedicated · Description
Related peer industries
Peer-industry evidence tier: High-confidence peer-industry evidence. Peer-industry evidence combines 9 related companies, 5 peer-industry clusters, and top peer industry Hospitals and Health Care at 22.2%.
Hospitals and Health Care 2 peers
22.2% of related peer industries
Spectator Sports 2 peers
22.2% of related peer industries
Professional Services 1 peer
11.1% of related peer industries
Government Administration 1 peer
11.1% of related peer industries
Health, Wellness & Fitness 1 peer
11.1% of related peer industries

Company signals

Company signal breadth
Two-signal company record
Company-level signals include social audience and ownership.
Corroborated company record evidence: Company record evidence combines 2 source-backed company signal types: social audience and ownership.
Social audience
181
Followers in the company source record.
Social audience evidence tier: Limited social-audience evidence. Social audience evidence uses 181 followers from source field social_followers.
Audience density
Low audience density
181 followers against 82 employee estimate, about 2.20 followers per estimated employee.
Audience-density evidence tier: Limited audience-density evidence. Audience-density evidence combines 181 social followers, 82 employee estimate, and 2.20 followers per estimated employee.
Company ownership
Private company record
Company source record includes source type Privately Held.
Company ownership evidence tier: Structured ownership evidence. Ownership evidence combines source type Privately Held from structured company source fields.

Workforce composition

Department concentration
Department-concentrated workforce
Most mapped workforce signals are in General. 80.8% of mapped department signals are in the largest department.
Department concentration evidence tier: Concentrated department evidence. Department concentration evidence combines 4 mapped departments, top department General, and 80.8% top-department share.
Department leadership coverage
Focused department leadership coverage
Leadership signals appear in 1 of 4 mapped departments. Leadership signals represent 3.8% of mapped department signals.
Department leadership evidence tier: Limited department leadership evidence. Department leadership evidence combines 1 leadership signal, 1 of 4 mapped departments, and 3.8% leadership density.
Department seniority map
Multi-department seniority map
Visible department samples map 10 seniority-classified profiles across 4 departments and 2 seniority bands.
Department seniority evidence tier: High-confidence department seniority evidence. Department seniority evidence combines 10 seniority-classified profiles, 4 departments, 2 seniority bands, and top cell General + Individual contributor with 6 profiles.
General 7 profiles
Individual contributor: 6 Associate / junior: 1
Healthcare 1 profile
Individual contributor: 1
IT 1 profile
Individual contributor: 1
Marketing 1 profile
Associate / junior: 1
1 leadership signals 1 departments with visible contacts
General 21 signals
80.8% of mapped department signals, 1 leadership signals, 2 visible contacts
IT 3 signals
11.5% of mapped department signals
Healthcare 1 signals
3.8% of mapped department signals
Marketing 1 signals
3.8% of mapped department signals

Technology talent signals

1 matched technology role signals.

Technology evidence tier
Mapped technology evidence
1 matched technology role signal found in the workforce graph.
3 IT department signals
Data / AI 1 profile
100.0% of matched technology role signals
Matched role examples
Data-driven - Proficient in Python and R. - Certificates in Tableau, SQL, and Excel 1

Workforce seniority mix

Aggregated from 13 classified profile signals.

Largest seniority band
Individual contributor
9 of 13 classified profile signals, 3 with visible contact data.
Corroborated seniority evidence: Seniority graph spans 13 classified profile signals across 3 tiers, with reachable evidence for 3. Contributor-heavy visible sample.
Management-to-IC proxy
Contributor-heavy visible sample
7.7%
managerial seniority signals
92.3%
contributor seniority signals
1 managerial seniority signal and 12 contributor signals appear in the visible seniority-classified sample.
Management-shape evidence tier: Contributor-heavy management-shape evidence. Management-shape evidence combines 13 seniority-classified signals, 1 managerial signal, 7.7% managerial share, and 12 contributor signals.
Individual contributor 9 profiles
69.2% of classified seniority signals, 3 with visible contact data
Associate / junior 3 profiles
23.1% of classified seniority signals
Director 1 profile
7.7% of classified seniority signals

Workforce geography

Aggregated from 12 visible profile location signals.

Workforce geography evidence
Corroborated workforce geography evidence
Workforce geography spans 9 locations across 12 visible profile signals, with reachable evidence across 3 locations. Top workforce hub shares company country.
Distribution signal
Distributed workforce
Visible profile location signals are spread across 9 locations.
Workforce distribution model
Broad distributed workforce model
Visible profile locations are spread across 9 workforce locations, with New York City Metropolitan Area, United States as the largest hub at 16%.
Corroborated workforce model evidence: Workforce model evidence combines 12 located profile signals, 9 workforce locations, 9 cities, 1 country, top hub New York City Metropolitan Area, United States at 16%, company-location alignment, and 3 reachable locations.
Locations
9
Countries
1
Top hub share
16%
Workforce location footprint
Multi-city workforce footprint
Visible profile locations span 9 cities across 1 country, led by New York City Metropolitan Area.
Cities
9
Countries
1
Company-location alignment
Top workforce hub shares company country
The largest visible workforce location is New York City Metropolitan Area, United States, in the same country as company location Hauppauge, New York, United States.
Top workforce hub share: 16.7%
Company-location evidence tier: Corroborated company-location alignment evidence. Company-location alignment evidence combines company location Hauppauge, New York, United States, top workforce hub New York City Metropolitan Area, United States, 16.7% top workforce hub share, and country match.
Contactable location spread
Multi-location contact coverage
Visible contact samples span 3 workforce locations, led by Smithtown, New York, United States.
Contactable location evidence tier: High-confidence contactable location evidence. Contactable location evidence combines 3 contactable profile location signals, 3 workforce locations, top contactable hub Smithtown, New York, United States at 33.3%, and company-location alignment.
Contactable workforce hub shares company country: The largest contactable workforce location is Smithtown, New York, United States, in the same country as company location Hauppauge, New York, United States. Top contactable hub share: 33.3%.
Smithtown, New York, United States 1 contact
33.3% of contactable location signals
Westbury, New York, United States 1 contact
33.3% of contactable location signals
Middle Island, New York, United States 1 contact
33.3% of contactable location signals
New York City Metropolitan Area, United States 2 profiles
16.7% of visible location signals
Mount Sinai, New York, United States 2 profiles
16.7% of visible location signals
Nesconset, New York, United States 2 profiles
16.7% of visible location signals
Smithtown, New York, United States 1 profile
8.3% of visible location signals
Westbury, New York, United States 1 profile
8.3% of visible location signals
Kings Park, New York, United States 1 profile
8.3% of visible location signals

Role and function mix

13 visible titled profiles across 13 distinct role titles.

Title mix
Diverse role title sample
13 distinct role titles across 13 visible titled profiles.
Role-title evidence tier: Diverse role-title evidence. Role-title diversity evidence combines 13 visible titled profiles, 13 distinct role titles, and top title Coach at the Rinx at 7.7%.
Contactable role coverage
Diverse contactable role coverage
3 reachable role titles across 3 contactable titled profiles.
Contactable role evidence tier: Diverse contactable role evidence. Contactable role evidence combines 3 contactable titled profiles, 3 reachable role titles, and top reachable role Ice Skating Coach at 33.3%.
Role title reachability
Broad role-title reachability
3 of 13 distinct visible role titles include email or phone signals.
Role-title reachability evidence tier: Corroborated role-title reachability evidence. Role-title reachability evidence combines 13 visible role titles, 3 reachable titles, and 23.1% title reachability.
Coach at the Rinx 1 profile
7.7% of visible titled profiles
Data-driven - Proficient in Python and R. - Certificates in Tableau, SQL, and Excel 1 profile
7.7% of visible titled profiles
Ice Skating Coach 1 profile
7.7% of visible titled profiles
Junior Marketing Major - Isenberg School of Management 1 profile
7.7% of visible titled profiles
Peconic Ice Rinks Skating Director 1 profile
7.7% of visible titled profiles
Pursuing Health Sciences 1 profile
7.7% of visible titled profiles

Contactability signals

Contactability score 50.0%
2 of 4 visible profiles include email or phone signals.
Contact channel mix
Multi-channel contact coverage
Visible profile or company source data includes email and phone channels.
Contact evidence tier
Mapped contact-channel evidence
Visible profile or company source data includes email and phone channels.
Contact data safety
Corroborated privacy-safe contact intelligence
AeroLeads exposes contact counts, channel mix, freshness, and domain-alignment evidence while hiding raw email addresses and masking phone numbers in public output.
Aggregate signals
3
Channel coverage
Email and phone aggregate coverage
Evidence groups
3
Corroborated contact-safety evidence: Contact-safety evidence combines visible profile contact sample, company email sample, and official-domain email evidence; public schema uses aggregate variables only.
Aggregate-only contact schema: Dataset variables use counts, rates, channel labels, freshness bands, and domain-alignment metrics instead of raw contact values.
Visible people
4
With contact data
2
Email coverage
2
50.0% of visible profiles
Phone coverage
1
25.0% of visible profiles
Company email sample
Limited company email sample
AeroLeads source data includes 1 email record across 1 domain; raw addresses are hidden. 1 match therinx.com.
Source email evidence tier: Limited source email evidence. Source email evidence combines 1 unique source email record, 1 domain, 1 matching therinx.com, and 100.0% official-domain rate.

Email domain intelligence

0 of 4 visible email signals match therinx.com.

Non-official email coverage: Visible email signals use non-official domains only.
Email identity evidence tier: Non-official email identity evidence. Email identity evidence combines 4 visible email signals, 1 other-domain signal, and 3 personal-domain signals.
0.0% domain match 0 people with official-domain email 4 non-official email signals

Department contact samples

Focused department contact spread: Visible contact samples appear in 1 of 4 mapped departments.
Department contactability evidence tier: Limited department contactability evidence. Department contactability evidence combines 2 visible contact samples, 1 of 4 mapped departments, 1 email signal, and 1 phone signal; raw contacts are hidden.
Department Contacts Email Official email Phone
General 2 1 0 1
Top email pattern: firstl at 100.0% of matched patterns.
Format example: [first][last_initial]@therinx.com
Dominant pattern: One email pattern accounts for most matched examples.
Email pattern evidence tier: High-confidence email pattern evidence. Email pattern evidence combines 1 matched pattern, 100.0% top-pattern share, and format example for therinx.com.
firstl 100.0%

Explore related pages

The Rinx email format The Rinx management graph and contactability signals

Related company intelligence:

2 of 4 visible The Rinx profiles include email or phone signals. Review people graph
The strongest The Rinx email pattern signal is [first][last_initial] , representing 100.0% of matched email-pattern evidence in the AeroLeads company graph.
In total, AeroLeads has detected 1 aggregate email-pattern signals for The Rinx. View the detailed email format page .

The Rinx Email Pattern Intelligence Snapshot

These aggregate patterns support the company intelligence page. The dedicated email-format workflow lives on The Rinx email format .

Observed pattern
Example pattern
[first][last_initial]
[first][last_initial]@therinx.com
100%

The Rinx Questions

The Rinx people graph sample