TSU Protection Services Namibia (Pty) Ltd

TSU Protection Services Namibia (Pty) Ltd Intelligence, Employees & Workforce Signals

People graph depth
74 signals
Deep profile graph across 4 mapped departments.
Account research
6 steps
Account research checklist combines best covered outreach path, buying-committee coverage, ICP fit, technology workforce evidence, related-company graph, and domain trust; raw contact values are hidden.
Technology talent
1
Technology-oriented role signals in the workforce graph.
Outreach path
General + Manager
Coverage combines 1 visible General contact signal, 1 contactable Manager decision-maker signal, and 2 official-domain decision-maker email signals.
Evidence quality 100/100 Priority intelligence record

AeroLeads company intelligence

TSU Protection Services Namibia (Pty) Ltd workforce intelligence signals

Evidence from AeroLeads company records, matched professional profiles, and related company graph.

High confidence
Intelligence completeness
Strong intelligence record
8 of 11 major intelligence groups are available for this company.
Largest mapped team
Finance
2 profile signals in Finance.
Departments mapped
4
Workforce composition from AeroLeads profile data.
Profile graph
Deep profile graph
74 mapped workforce signals against a 113 employee size estimate.
Top reachable team
General
1 visible contact signal.
Top seniority band
Individual contributor
12 of 17 classified profile signals.
Technology talent
1
Technology roles and departments found in workforce signals.

Profile graph researchability

Visible people graph includes 17 visible people: 17 named, 17 titled, 15 located, and 2 contactable.

Multi-signal profile graph
Profile coverage evidence tier: Deep profile coverage evidence. Profile coverage evidence combines 74 mapped workforce signals, 113 employee size estimate, and 65.5% profile graph coverage.
Corroborated profile graph evidence: Researchability is based on 17 visible people with 4 populated evidence dimensions: named, titled, located, and contactable signals.
Profile association confidence: Corroborated profile association. Association confidence combines 17 titled profiles, 2 official-domain email profiles, 2 titled profiles with official-domain email, 2 located profiles with official-domain email, and 2 contactable profiles.
People
17
Named
17
Titled
17
Located
15
Contactable
2

Data methodology

AeroLeads renders only source-backed fields for this company page.

5 source groups
Company record Matched profile graph Email-pattern aggregate Related company graph Company signal fields
Blank source fields are omitted
Related companies are ordered deterministically
Structured data uses aggregate counts only

Intelligence completeness

8 of 11 major intelligence groups are available for this company.

8 / 11 groups
Strong intelligence record 72.7%
Workforce composition Contactability Email intelligence Decision makers Buying committee Technology talent Domain confidence Market and peer context

Evidence quality

This page clears the 60+ AeroLeads company-intelligence evidence threshold.

100 / 100
Priority intelligence record Threshold 60+
Workforce composition Department contactability Department contactability heatmap Official-domain department contactability Department seniority map Official-domain department leaders
Workforce graph
34 signals
Workforce composition, Department contactability, Department contactability heatmap
Source trust
14 signals
Functional team estimates, Functional coverage gap, Domain confidence
Decision-maker intelligence
10 signals
Decision-maker coverage, Leadership signals, Department leadership coverage
Technology intelligence
1 signal
Technology talent
Contactability
12 signals
Email pattern intelligence, Email usability mix, Official-domain contact freshness
Market and peer context
14 signals
Related company graph, Peer graph strength, Peer position benchmark
Company momentum
2 signals
Company signal breadth, Company ownership signal
81 additional source-backed evidence signals are counted in this page quality score.

Prospecting readiness

TSU Protection Services Namibia (Pty) Ltd shows actionable prospecting fit based on best covered outreach path, decision-maker coverage, technology workforce evidence, and people graph depth.

60 / 100
Actionable prospecting fit High-confidence prospecting evidence

Prospecting evidence combines best covered outreach path, decision-maker coverage, technology workforce evidence, people graph depth, and peer context; raw contact values are hidden.

ICP fit
Qualified ICP fit

ICP fit combines company size, market specificity, buying committee, technology path, and people graph depth; raw contact values are hidden.

73 / 100
Company size
113 employees
Employee estimate is in a common outbound prospecting range.
Market specificity
Focused market profile
9 market classification signals across categories, specialties, and related peer industries.
Buying committee
Mapped buying committee
Mapped decision-maker signals span 1 business function.
Technology path
Mapped technology evidence
1 matched technology role signal found in the workforce graph.
People graph depth
Deep profile graph
74 mapped workforce signals against a 113 employee size estimate.
Account research checklist
Multi-step account research checklist

Account research checklist combines best covered outreach path, buying-committee coverage, ICP fit, technology workforce evidence, related-company graph, and domain trust; raw contact values are hidden.

6 steps
Confirm contact path
General + Manager
Outreach path evidence combines 1 visible General contact signal, 1 contactable Manager decision-maker signal, and 2 official-domain decision-maker email signals; raw contacts are hidden.
Map reachable buying committee
Mapped buying committee
Buying-committee evidence combines 1 mapped buying-committee function and Operations function coverage.
Validate ICP fit
Qualified ICP fit
ICP fit combines company size, market specificity, buying committee, technology path, and people graph depth; raw contact values are hidden.
Review technology path
Mapped technology evidence
1 matched technology role signal found in the workforce graph.
Compare related peers
Limited peer comparison
Compares this company with related-company evidence across employee scale and peer graph evidence.
Check domain trust
High-confidence domain alignment
Domain evidence combines website domain, social profile, employee email alignment, profile-domain association, and company email sample; raw email addresses are hidden.
Best outreach path
General + Manager
Coverage combines 1 visible General contact signal, 1 contactable Manager decision-maker signal, and 2 official-domain decision-maker email signals.
Decision-maker coverage
Mapped buying committee
Mapped decision-maker signals span 1 business function.
Technology contact path
Mapped technology evidence
1 matched technology role signal found in the workforce graph.
People graph depth
Deep profile graph
74 mapped workforce signals against a 113 employee size estimate.
Person-level contact coverage missing: No visible people on this page include email or phone contact evidence.

Domain trust signals

Domain confidence for tsuafrica.com is based on website domain, social profile, employee email alignment, profile-domain association, and company email sample.

90 / 100
High-confidence domain alignment High-confidence domain evidence

Domain evidence combines website domain, social profile, employee email alignment, profile-domain association, and company email sample; raw email addresses are hidden.

Website domain
tsuafrica.com
The official website domain is available from the company source record.
Social profile
LinkedIn organization page
A LinkedIn organization page is present for this company record.
Employee email alignment
2 official-domain email signals
100% of visible employee email signals match tsuafrica.com; raw addresses are hidden.
Profile-domain association
2 people with official-domain email
Matched people include official-domain email evidence; raw addresses are hidden.
Company email sample
12 official-domain source email records
Company-level email source records include official-domain coverage; raw addresses are hidden.

AeroLeads coverage snapshot

Profile sample
4
Visible people attached to this company page.
Profile graph depth
Deep profile graph
74 mapped workforce signals against a 113 employee size estimate.
Contact evidence confidence
High-confidence contact evidence
2 current or verified professional email signals, and 12 company-domain email signals; raw addresses and numbers are hidden.
Department coverage
4
Departments represented in AeroLeads workforce signals.
Department concentration
Department-concentrated workforce
Most mapped workforce signals are in General.
Leadership signals
3
Department lead or leadership signals in the org data.
Department leader sample
Department leader sample
AeroLeads source data includes 3 leadership signals across 2 departments; rows show titles and contact-channel presence only.
Official-domain department leaders
Multi-department official-domain leaders
2 department leader samples across 2 departments include company-domain email signals.
Department leadership coverage
Focused department leadership coverage
Leadership signals appear in 2 of 4 mapped departments.
Leadership density
4.10
Percent of mapped department signals that are leadership signals.
Department contact coverage
2
Departments with visible contact samples.
Department contact spread
Focused department contact spread
Visible contact samples appear in 2 of 4 mapped departments.
Department contactability heatmap
Email-led department contact map
Department samples show 2 email signals and 0 phone signals across 2 contactable departments.
Official-domain department contactability
Multi-department official-domain coverage
2 of 4 mapped departments include visible company-domain email signals.
Department seniority map
Multi-department seniority map
Visible department samples map 13 seniority-classified profiles across 4 departments and 3 seniority bands.
Technology talent
1
Visible profiles matching technology role patterns.
Technology evidence confidence
Mapped technology evidence
1 matched technology role signal found in the workforce graph.
Technology department signals
1
Mapped department profile signals in technology-oriented teams.
Email-pattern variants
1
Distinct matched business email patterns.
Official-domain emails
2
Email signals matching tsuafrica.com.
Email domain confidence
Strong official-domain coverage
Most visible email signals match tsuafrica.com.
Domain confidence
High-confidence domain alignment
Domain confidence for tsuafrica.com is based on website domain, social profile, employee email alignment, profile-domain association, and company email sample.
Email usability mix
Strong current professional email coverage
AeroLeads source data includes 2 unique visible email signals; 2 are marked current or verified and 2 are professional-type. Raw addresses are hidden.
Contact freshness
Dated contact metadata
AeroLeads source data includes 12 dated contact records; 0 fall within 90 days and 0 fall within 12 months of the Jun 2026 source update. Raw emails and phone numbers are hidden.
Contact data safety
Corroborated privacy-safe contact intelligence
AeroLeads exposes contact counts, channel mix, freshness, and domain-alignment evidence while hiding raw email addresses and masking phone numbers in public output.
Official-domain contact freshness
Dated official-domain contact metadata
12 dated official-domain email records; 0 fall within 12 months of the Jun 2026 source update.
Company signal breadth
Multi-signal company record
Company-level signals include social audience, company maturity, and ownership.
Company ownership signal
Private company record
Company source record includes source type Privately Held.
Audience density
Low audience density
669 followers against 113 employee estimate, about 5.90 followers per estimated employee.
Specialty signals
6
Specialty tags in the company record.
Market specificity
Focused market profile
9 market classification signals across categories, specialties, and related peer industries.
Peer industry clusters
2
Industries represented by related company records.
Related companies
10
Company graph links available for comparison.
Industry benchmark
Evidence-backed industry benchmark
Industry benchmark uses 10 related companies, 8 same-industry peers, 3 benchmark dimensions, and 4 peer evidence types from the AeroLeads related-company graph.
Peer benchmark confidence
Multi-signal peer benchmark evidence
Peer benchmark combines 10 related companies with peer graph strength, size benchmark, and size position. Underlying peer graph includes 4 evidence types: industry context, employee benchmarks, website records, social profiles.
Peer position benchmark
Employee-scale peer position benchmark
Peer-position benchmark shows employee scale above 20% of 10 comparable related peers.
Peer comparison matrix
Limited peer comparison
Compares this company with related-company evidence across employee scale and peer graph evidence.
Workforce locations
11
Locations represented in visible profile signals.
Workforce distribution
Distributed workforce
Visible profile location signals are spread across 11 locations.
Workforce location footprint
Multi-country workforce footprint
Visible profile locations span 11 cities across 2 countries, led by City of Johannesburg.
Workforce distribution model
International distributed workforce model
Visible profile locations span 2 countries and 11 workforce locations; no single hub exceeds 20% of visible location signals.
Workforce geography evidence confidence
High-confidence workforce geography evidence
Workforce geography spans 11 locations across 15 visible profile signals, with reachable evidence across 2 locations and company-domain evidence across 2 locations. Top workforce hub differs from company location.
Contactable workforce locations
2
Workforce locations represented by visible contact samples.
Top contactable workforce location
City of Johannesburg, Gauteng, South Africa
Visible contact samples span 2 workforce locations, led by City of Johannesburg, Gauteng, South Africa.
Workforce seniority tiers
3
Seniority bands derived from visible profile titles and levels.
Seniority evidence confidence
High-confidence seniority evidence
Seniority graph spans 17 classified profile signals across 3 tiers, with reachable evidence for 2 and company-domain evidence for 2. Contributor-heavy visible sample.
Classified seniority profiles
17
Visible profiles with usable seniority signals.
Official-domain seniority profiles
Multi-profile official-domain seniority evidence
2 seniority-classified profiles across 2 tiers include company-domain email signals.
Management-to-IC proxy
Contributor-heavy visible sample
5 managerial seniority signals and 12 contributor signals appear in the visible seniority-classified sample.
Role title diversity
Diverse role title sample
17 distinct role titles across 17 visible titled profiles.
Visible role titles
17
Distinct role titles found in visible profile signals.
Business function mix
Multi-function workforce sample
AeroLeads maps 5 visible profile signals into 3 business functions; 0 include visible contact data.
Mapped business functions
3
Business functions inferred from visible profile titles and departments.
Functional team estimates
Engineering team estimate
AeroLeads derives 2 visible engineering team profile signals from mapped business-function signals.
Functional coverage gaps
Partial function coverage map
Visible people signals cover 3 of 8 core business functions. Not observed in the visible graph: Sales / revenue, Marketing / growth, Product / design, and People / HR. Treat this as a coverage gap, not confirmed absence.
Contactable role titles
2
Distinct role titles with visible contact samples.
Contactable role coverage
Mixed contactable role coverage
2 reachable role titles, led by Managing Director at 50.0% of contactable titled profiles.
Decision-maker signals
5
Visible profiles matching seniority or leadership title patterns.
Decision-maker reachability
Partial decision-maker reachability
Some mapped decision-maker signals include visible contact data.
Buying committee evidence confidence
Mapped buying committee
Mapped decision-maker signals span 1 business function.
Buyer persona availability
Single-persona buyer availability
Mapped decision-maker evidence covers Operations buyer; 0 of 1 buyer persona include visible contact data.
Decision-maker contactability rate
40
Percent of mapped decision-maker signals with visible contact data.
Official-domain decision-maker coverage
Strong official-domain decision-maker coverage
Most contactable decision-maker signals use tsuafrica.com email coverage.
Official-domain decision-maker contacts
2
Contactable decision-maker signals with official-domain email coverage.
Best covered outreach path
General + Manager
Coverage combines 1 visible General contact signal, 1 contactable Manager decision-maker signal, and 2 official-domain decision-maker email signals.
Prospecting fit
Actionable prospecting fit
TSU Protection Services Namibia (Pty) Ltd shows actionable prospecting fit based on best covered outreach path, decision-maker coverage, technology workforce evidence, and people graph depth.
ICP fit
Qualified ICP fit
TSU Protection Services Namibia (Pty) Ltd matches the qualified ICP fit band for common outbound filters based on company size, market specificity, buying committee, technology path, and people graph depth.
Account research checklist
Multi-step account research checklist
Account research checklist combines best covered outreach path, buying-committee coverage, ICP fit, technology workforce evidence, related-company graph, and domain trust; raw contact values are hidden.
Intelligence signal groups
26
AeroLeads signal groups available for this company.

Market focus signals

Primary industry
Security and Investigations
Market specificity
Focused market profile
9 market classification signals across categories, specialties, and related peer industries.
Market evidence tier
High-confidence market evidence
Market evidence combines 9 classification signals from categories, specialties, related peer industries, and description keywords. 6 description-backed keyword signals are included.
Industry benchmark
Evidence-backed industry benchmark
Industry benchmark uses 10 related companies, 8 same-industry peers, 3 benchmark dimensions, and 4 peer evidence types from the AeroLeads related-company graph.
Top peer industry
Security and Investigations
88% of 10 related peer industry signals.
Peer benchmark evidence
Multi-signal peer benchmark evidence
Peer benchmark combines 10 related companies with peer graph strength, size benchmark, and size position. Underlying peer graph includes 4 evidence types: industry context, employee benchmarks, website records, social profiles.
Size position
Smaller than most related peers
8 of 10 related employee-estimated peers are higher.
Peer graph strength
Benchmark-ready peer graph
Related peer graph has industry context, employee benchmarks, website records, and social profiles across 10 related companies.
Benchmark dimensions: peer graph strength, size benchmark, and size position.
Categories
Security and Investigations
Specialties
Executive / VIP Protection Executive Support Services Risk Management Specialised Training Asset Protection Armed Tactical Support
Product-market keyword evidence
Description-backed market keywords
Keyword evidence comes from 3 source field groups: Category, Specialty, Description.
Product-market keyword evidence tier: High-confidence product-market keyword evidence. Product-market keyword evidence combines 13 unique market keywords, 3 source field groups, and 6 description-backed keywords (1 category, 6 specialty, and 6 description).
Security and Investigations · Category Executive / VIP Protection · Specialty Executive Support Services · Specialty Risk Management · Specialty Specialised Training · Specialty Asset Protection · Specialty Armed Tactical Support · Specialty was started · Description former members · Description police special task · Description tactical training · Description impressive number · Description
Related peer industries
Peer-industry evidence tier: High-confidence peer-industry evidence. Peer-industry evidence combines 9 related companies, 2 peer-industry clusters, and top peer industry Security and Investigations at 88.9%.
Functional coverage gaps
Partial function coverage map
Visible people signals cover 3 of 8 core business functions. Not observed in the visible graph: Sales / revenue, Marketing / growth, Product / design, and People / HR. Treat this as a coverage gap, not confirmed absence.
Transparent function coverage evidence: Function coverage evidence combines observed functions Technology / data, Finance, and Operations and 5 unobserved core functions in the visible graph.
Security and Investigations 8 peers
88.9% of related peer industries
Financial Services 1 peer
11.1% of related peer industries

Company signals

Company signal breadth
Multi-signal company record
Company-level signals include social audience, company maturity, and ownership.
Corroborated company record evidence: Company record evidence combines 3 source-backed company signal types: social audience, company maturity, and ownership.
Social audience
669
Followers in the company source record.
Social audience evidence tier: Limited social-audience evidence. Social audience evidence uses 669 followers from source field social_followers.
Audience density
Low audience density
669 followers against 113 employee estimate, about 5.90 followers per estimated employee.
Audience-density evidence tier: Limited audience-density evidence. Audience-density evidence combines 669 social followers, 113 employee estimate, and 5.90 followers per estimated employee.
Company maturity
Mature company record
Company source record includes founding year 1999, about 27 years before 2026.
Company maturity evidence tier: Long-running maturity evidence. Maturity evidence combines founding year 1999, 27 years of company history, and source field founded.
Company ownership
Private company record
Company source record includes source type Privately Held.
Company ownership evidence tier: Structured ownership evidence. Ownership evidence combines source type Privately Held from structured company source fields.

Workforce composition

Department concentration
Department-concentrated workforce
Most mapped workforce signals are in General. 94.6% of mapped department signals are in the largest department.
Department concentration evidence tier: Concentrated department evidence. Department concentration evidence combines 4 mapped departments, top department General, and 94.6% top-department share.
Department leadership coverage
Focused department leadership coverage
Leadership signals appear in 2 of 4 mapped departments. Leadership signals represent 4.1% of mapped department signals.
Department leadership evidence tier: Corroborated department leadership evidence. Department leadership evidence combines 3 leadership signals, 2 of 4 mapped departments, and 4.1% leadership density.
Department seniority map
Multi-department seniority map
Visible department samples map 13 seniority-classified profiles across 4 departments and 3 seniority bands.
Department seniority evidence tier: High-confidence department seniority evidence. Department seniority evidence combines 13 seniority-classified profiles, 4 departments, 3 seniority bands, and top cell General + Individual contributor with 7 profiles.
General 9 profiles
Manager: 2 Individual contributor: 7
Finance 2 profiles
Individual contributor: 2
Executive 1 profile
Director: 1
IT 1 profile
Individual contributor: 1
3 leadership signals 2 departments with visible contacts
Department leader sample
Department leader sample
2 contactable 2 official-domain

AeroLeads source data includes 3 leadership signals across 2 departments; rows show titles and contact-channel presence only.

Department leader evidence tier: High-confidence department leader evidence. Department leader evidence combines 3 leadership signals, 2 departments, 2 contactable, and 2 official-domain; raw contacts are hidden.

Multi-department official-domain leaders: 2 department leader samples across 2 departments include company-domain email signals.

Leader Department Seniority Channel
steven lochner
Managing Director
Executive Director Email
Johannes Matjila
Regional Manager at Tsu Protection Services Namibia (Pty) Ltd
General Manager Email
sandro tura
Hse Manager at Tsu Protection Services Namibia (Pty) Ltd
General Manager No visible contact channel
General 70 signals
94.6% of mapped department signals, 2 leadership signals, 1 visible contact
Finance 2 signals
2.7% of mapped department signals
Executive 1 signals
1.4% of mapped department signals, 1 leadership signals, 1 visible contact
IT 1 signals
1.4% of mapped department signals

Technology talent signals

1 matched technology role signals.

Technology evidence tier
Mapped technology evidence
1 matched technology role signal found in the workforce graph.
1 IT department signals
Security 1 profile
100.0% of matched technology role signals
Matched role examples
Security Officer 1

Workforce seniority mix

Aggregated from 17 classified profile signals.

Largest seniority band
Individual contributor
12 of 17 classified profile signals.
Multi-profile official-domain seniority evidence: 2 seniority-classified profiles across 2 tiers include company-domain email signals.
High-confidence seniority evidence: Seniority graph spans 17 classified profile signals across 3 tiers, with reachable evidence for 2 and company-domain evidence for 2. Contributor-heavy visible sample.
Management-to-IC proxy
Contributor-heavy visible sample
29.4%
managerial seniority signals
70.6%
contributor seniority signals
5 managerial seniority signals and 12 contributor signals appear in the visible seniority-classified sample.
Management-shape evidence tier: Contributor-heavy management-shape evidence. Management-shape evidence combines 17 seniority-classified signals, 5 managerial signals, 29.4% managerial share, and 12 contributor signals.
Individual contributor 12 profiles
70.6% of classified seniority signals
Manager 4 profiles
23.5% of classified seniority signals, 1 with visible contact data, 1 official-domain
Director 1 profile
5.9% of classified seniority signals, 1 with visible contact data, 1 official-domain

Workforce geography

Aggregated from 15 visible profile location signals.

Workforce geography evidence
High-confidence workforce geography evidence
Workforce geography spans 11 locations across 15 visible profile signals, with reachable evidence across 2 locations and company-domain evidence across 2 locations. Top workforce hub differs from company location.
Distribution signal
Distributed workforce
Visible profile location signals are spread across 11 locations.
Workforce distribution model
International distributed workforce model
Visible profile locations span 2 countries and 11 workforce locations; no single hub exceeds 20% of visible location signals.
High-confidence workforce model evidence: Workforce model evidence combines 15 located profile signals, 11 workforce locations, 11 cities, 2 countries, top hub City of Johannesburg, Gauteng, South Africa at 20%, company-location alignment, 2 reachable locations, and 2 company-domain locations.
Locations
11
Countries
2
Top hub share
20%
Workforce location footprint
Multi-country workforce footprint
Visible profile locations span 11 cities across 2 countries, led by City of Johannesburg.
Cities
11
Countries
2
Company-location alignment
Top workforce hub differs from company location
The largest visible workforce location is City of Johannesburg, Gauteng, South Africa, while the company location is Windhoek.
Top workforce hub share: 20.0%
Company-location evidence tier: Workforce-location divergence evidence. Company-location alignment evidence combines company location Windhoek, top workforce hub City of Johannesburg, Gauteng, South Africa, 20.0% top workforce hub share, and location difference.
Contactable location spread
Multi-location contact coverage
Visible contact samples span 2 workforce locations, led by City of Johannesburg, Gauteng, South Africa.
Contactable location evidence tier: Multi-location contactable evidence. Contactable location evidence combines 2 contactable profile location signals, 2 workforce locations, top contactable hub City of Johannesburg, Gauteng, South Africa at 50.0%, and company-location alignment.
Contactable workforce hub differs from company location: The largest contactable workforce location is City of Johannesburg, Gauteng, South Africa, while the company location is Windhoek. Top contactable hub share: 50.0%.
City of Johannesburg, Gauteng, South Africa 1 contact
50.0% of contactable location signals
Namibia 1 contact
50.0% of contactable location signals
Official-domain location spread
Multi-location official-domain workforce
Company-domain email profile locations span 2 workforce locations, led by City of Johannesburg, Gauteng, South Africa.
2 profiles with tsuafrica.com email evidence include location signals.
Official-domain location evidence tier: Multi-location official-domain evidence. Official-domain location evidence combines 2 official-domain profile location signals, 2 workforce locations, top official-domain hub City of Johannesburg, Gauteng, South Africa at 50.0%, and company-location alignment.
Official-domain workforce hub differs from company location: The largest company-domain email workforce location is City of Johannesburg, Gauteng, South Africa, while the company location is Windhoek. Top official-domain hub share: 50.0%.
City of Johannesburg, Gauteng, South Africa 1 profile
50.0% of official-domain location signals
Namibia 1 profile
50.0% of official-domain location signals
City of Johannesburg, Gauteng, South Africa 3 profiles
20.0% of visible location signals
Johannesburg, Gauteng, South Africa 2 profiles
13.3% of visible location signals
City of Cape Town, Western Cape, South Africa 2 profiles
13.3% of visible location signals
Kuils River, Western Cape, South Africa 1 profile
6.7% of visible location signals
Georgia 1 profile
6.7% of visible location signals
Pretoria, Gauteng, South Africa 1 profile
6.7% of visible location signals

Decision-maker coverage

5 seniority signals, 2 with visible contact data.

Decision-maker evidence tier
Corroborated decision-maker evidence
Decision-maker evidence covers 5 seniority signals, 2 reachable, and 2 company-domain. Buying committee spans 1 function.
Account planning snapshot
Multi-signal account planning snapshot
Snapshot combines department reachability, decision-maker coverage, and buying-committee function aggregates.
3 account-planning evidence cards available.
Account planning evidence tier: Corroborated account planning evidence. Account planning evidence combines 3 aggregate account-planning cards, best covered outreach path, 2 official-domain decision-maker signals, Manager seniority reachability, and General department contactability; raw contacts are hidden.
Best covered path
General + Manager
Coverage combines 1 visible General contact signal, 1 contactable Manager decision-maker signal, and 2 official-domain decision-maker email signals.
Most reachable seniority
Manager
1 of 4 signals in this seniority band include visible contact data.
Top reachable team
General
1 visible contact signal in this department sample.
Partial decision-maker reachability 40.0%
Some mapped decision-maker signals include visible contact data.
Decision-maker reachability evidence tier: Partial decision-maker reachability evidence. Decision-maker reachability evidence combines 2 contactable decision-maker signals, 5 mapped decision-maker signals, 40.0% contactability, and 2 official-domain decision-maker signals.
Email-led decision-maker coverage: Mapped decision-maker contact data is strongest for email, with 2 email signals.
Buying committee function coverage
Single-function buying-committee coverage
0 of 1 mapped functions include visible decision-maker contact data.
Mapped buying committee: Mapped decision-maker signals span 1 business function.
Buying committee evidence tier: Mapped buying-committee evidence. Buying-committee evidence combines 1 mapped buying-committee function and Operations function coverage.
Buyer persona availability: Single-persona buyer availability. Mapped decision-maker evidence covers Operations buyer; 0 of 1 buyer persona include visible contact data. Mapped buyer persona evidence: Buyer persona evidence combines 1 mapped buyer persona and Operations buyer coverage.
Operations
Most reachable seniority
Manager
1 of 4 seniority signals include visible contact data.
Seniority reachability evidence tier: Mapped seniority reachability evidence. Seniority reachability evidence combines 1 contactable Manager signal, 4 Manager signals, 25.0% tier contactability, 1 official-domain Manager signal, and email coverage.
Official-domain decision-maker coverage
Strong official-domain decision-maker coverage
2 contactable decision-maker signals match tsuafrica.com. Most contactable decision-maker signals use tsuafrica.com email coverage.
Official-domain decision-maker evidence tier: Strong official-domain decision-maker evidence. Official-domain decision-maker evidence combines 2 official-domain decision-maker signals, 2 contactable decision-maker signals, 100.0% official-domain coverage, and tsuafrica.com domain match.
Manager 4 profiles
80.0% of mapped seniority signals, 1 with visible contact data
Director 1 profile
20.0% of mapped seniority signals, 1 with visible contact data

Role and function mix

17 visible titled profiles across 17 distinct role titles.

Title mix
Diverse role title sample
17 distinct role titles across 17 visible titled profiles.
Role-title evidence tier: Diverse role-title evidence. Role-title diversity evidence combines 17 visible titled profiles, 17 distinct role titles, and top title Assistant Ops Manager - Cape Town Tsu at 5.9%.
Business function mix
Multi-function workforce sample
AeroLeads maps 5 visible profile signals into 3 business functions; 0 include visible contact data.
Business-function evidence tier: Mapped business-function evidence. Business-function evidence combines 5 mapped function profile signals, 3 business functions, and top function Finance at 40.0%.
Functional team estimates
Engineering team estimate
AeroLeads derives 2 visible engineering team profile signals from mapped business-function signals.
Mapped functional team evidence: Functional team estimate evidence combines 2 visible engineering team profile signals.
Engineering team estimate 2 profiles
40.0% of mapped function signals; Technology / data
Finance 2 profiles
40.0% of mapped function signals
Technology / data 2 profiles
40.0% of mapped function signals
Operations 1 profile
20.0% of mapped function signals
Contactable role coverage
Mixed contactable role coverage
2 reachable role titles, led by Managing Director at 50.0% of contactable titled profiles.
Contactable role evidence tier: Corroborated contactable role evidence. Contactable role evidence combines 2 contactable titled profiles, 2 reachable role titles, and top reachable role Managing Director at 50.0%.
Role title reachability
Partial role-title reachability
2 of 17 distinct visible role titles include email or phone signals.
Role-title reachability evidence tier: Corroborated role-title reachability evidence. Role-title reachability evidence combines 17 visible role titles, 2 reachable titles, 11.8% title reachability, and 2 official-domain titles.
Multi-title official-domain reachability 2 / 17 titles
2 of 17 distinct visible role titles include email signals matching tsuafrica.com.
Assistant Ops Manager - Cape Town Tsu 1 profile
5.9% of visible titled profiles
Available for Any Assignment 1 profile
5.9% of visible titled profiles
Cctv Operator at Tsu Protection Services Namibia (Pty) Ltd 1 profile
5.9% of visible titled profiles
Controller 1 profile
5.9% of visible titled profiles
Controller at Tsu Protection Services Namibia (Pty) Ltd 1 profile
5.9% of visible titled profiles
Data Entry Clerk at Tsu Protection Services Namibia (Pty) Ltd 1 profile
5.9% of visible titled profiles

Contactability signals

Contact evidence tier
High-confidence contact evidence
2 current or verified professional email signals, and 12 company-domain email signals; raw addresses and numbers are hidden.
Contact data safety
Corroborated privacy-safe contact intelligence
AeroLeads exposes contact counts, channel mix, freshness, and domain-alignment evidence while hiding raw email addresses and masking phone numbers in public output.
Aggregate signals
12
Channel coverage
Email aggregate coverage
Evidence groups
4
Corroborated contact-safety evidence: Contact-safety evidence combines company email sample, current email metadata, dated contact metadata, and official-domain email evidence; public schema uses aggregate variables only.
Aggregate-only contact schema: Dataset variables use counts, rates, channel labels, freshness bands, and domain-alignment metrics instead of raw contact values.
Best covered outreach path
General + Manager
Coverage combines 1 visible General contact signal, 1 contactable Manager decision-maker signal, and 2 official-domain decision-maker email signals.
Outreach path evidence tier: Corroborated outreach path evidence. Outreach path evidence combines 1 visible General contact signal, 1 contactable Manager decision-maker signal, and 2 official-domain decision-maker email signals; raw contacts are hidden.
Email usability mix
Strong current professional email coverage
AeroLeads source data includes 2 unique visible email signals; 2 are marked current or verified and 2 are professional-type. Raw addresses are hidden.
Email usability evidence tier: Corroborated email usability evidence. Email usability evidence combines 2 unique email signals, 2 current or verified, 2 professional-type, and 100.0% current signal rate; raw addresses are hidden.
2 current or verified 2 professional-type 100.0% current signal rate
Contact freshness
Dated contact metadata
AeroLeads source data includes 12 dated contact records; 0 fall within 90 days and 0 fall within 12 months of the Jun 2026 source update. Raw emails and phone numbers are hidden.
Contact freshness evidence tier: Dated contact freshness evidence. Contact freshness evidence combines 12 dated contact records, email timestamps, and 12 official-domain dated email records.
12 dated records 0 within 90 days 0.0% fresh rate 0 within 12 months Latest Sep 2021
Dated email metadata: Dated contact records include 12 email records.
Dated official-domain contact metadata: 12 dated official-domain email records; 0 fall within 12 months of the Jun 2026 source update.
Visible people
4
Company email sample
Company email sample
AeroLeads source data includes 12 email records across 1 domain; raw addresses are hidden. 12 match tsuafrica.com.
Source email evidence tier: High-confidence source email evidence. Source email evidence combines 12 unique source email records, 1 domain, 12 matching tsuafrica.com, and 100.0% official-domain rate.

Email domain intelligence

2 of 2 visible email signals match tsuafrica.com.

Strong official-domain coverage: Most visible email signals match tsuafrica.com.
Email identity evidence tier: Corroborated email identity evidence. Email identity evidence combines 2 visible email signals, 2 matching tsuafrica.com, 2 people with official-domain email, and 100.0% official-domain match.
100.0% domain match 2 people with official-domain email

Department contact samples

Focused department contact spread: Visible contact samples appear in 2 of 4 mapped departments.
Department contactability evidence tier: Corroborated department contactability evidence. Department contactability evidence combines 2 visible contact samples, 2 of 4 mapped departments, 2 email signals, and 2 official-domain email signals; raw contacts are hidden.
Contactability heatmap
Email-led department contact map
Department samples show 2 email signals and 0 phone signals across 2 contactable departments.
General Email
Email1
Phone0
Executive Email
Email1
Phone0
Official-domain department coverage
Multi-department official-domain coverage
2 of 4 mapped departments include visible company-domain email signals.
Department Contacts Email Official email Phone
General 1 1 1 0
Executive 1 1 1 0
Top email pattern: first.last at 100.0% of matched patterns.
Format example: [first].[last]@tsuafrica.com
Dominant pattern: One email pattern accounts for most matched examples.
Email pattern evidence tier: High-confidence email pattern evidence. Email pattern evidence combines 1 matched pattern, 100.0% top-pattern share, and format example for tsuafrica.com.
first.last 100.0%
TSU Protection Services Namibia (Pty) Ltd source record includes a 113 employee estimate. Review people graph
The strongest TSU Protection Services Namibia (Pty) Ltd email pattern signal is [first].[last] , representing 100.0% of matched email-pattern evidence in the AeroLeads company graph.
In total, AeroLeads has detected 1 aggregate email-pattern signals for TSU Protection Services Namibia (Pty) Ltd. View the detailed email format page .

TSU Protection Services Namibia (Pty) Ltd Email Pattern Intelligence Snapshot

These aggregate patterns support the company intelligence page. The dedicated email-format workflow lives on TSU Protection Services Namibia (Pty) Ltd email format .

Observed pattern
Example pattern
[first].[last]
[first].[last]@tsuafrica.com
100%

TSU Protection Services Namibia (Pty) Ltd Questions

TSU Protection Services Namibia (Pty) Ltd people graph sample