Women Influencers in Sport
Company intelligence

Women Influencers in Sport Company Intelligence, Employees & Contact Signals

Contact coverage
Email + phone
Visible profile or company source data includes email and phone channels. 2 visible profiles include direct contact evidence.
People graph depth
4 signals
4 mapped workforce signals against a 11 employee size estimate.
Account research
5 steps
Account research checklist combines person-level contact coverage, ICP fit, related-company graph, domain trust, and people graph depth; raw contact values are hidden.
Social audience
194
Audience size from company social follower data.
Evidence quality 100/100 Priority intelligence record

AeroLeads company intelligence

Women Influencers in Sport workforce and contactability signals

Evidence from AeroLeads company records, matched professional profiles, and related company graph.

High confidence
Intelligence completeness
Partial intelligence record
6 of 11 major intelligence groups are available for this company.
Profile graph
Deep profile graph
4 mapped workforce signals against a 11 employee size estimate.
Top seniority band
Individual contributor
2 of 4 classified profile signals.
Visible contact sample
2
Displayed people with email or phone data.
Social followers
194
Audience size from company social data.

Profile graph researchability

Visible people graph includes 4 visible people: 4 named, 4 titled, 3 located, and 2 contactable.

Profile research sample
Profile coverage evidence tier: Deep profile coverage evidence. Profile coverage evidence combines 4 mapped workforce signals, 11 employee size estimate, and 36.4% profile graph coverage.
Corroborated profile graph evidence: Researchability is based on 4 visible people with 4 populated evidence dimensions: named, titled, located, and contactable signals.
Profile association confidence: Profile association sample. Association confidence combines 4 titled profiles and 2 contactable profiles.
People
4
Named
4
Titled
4
Located
3
Contactable
2

Data methodology

AeroLeads renders only source-backed fields for this company page.

5 source groups
Company record Matched profile graph Email-pattern aggregate Related company graph Company signal fields
Blank source fields are omitted
Related companies are ordered deterministically
Structured data uses aggregate counts only

Intelligence completeness

6 of 11 major intelligence groups are available for this company.

6 / 11 groups
Partial intelligence record 54.5%
Workforce composition Contactability Email intelligence Decision makers Domain confidence Market and peer context

Evidence quality

This page clears the 60+ AeroLeads company-intelligence evidence threshold.

100 / 100
Priority intelligence record Threshold 60+
Employee email coverage Employee phone coverage Role title reachability Decision-maker coverage Email usability mix Related company graph
Contactability
9 signals
Employee email coverage, Employee phone coverage, Email usability mix
Workforce graph
15 signals
Role title reachability, Profile graph researchability, Workforce location footprint
Decision-maker intelligence
5 signals
Decision-maker coverage, Decision-maker reachability, Decision-maker channel mix
Market and peer context
14 signals
Related company graph, Peer graph strength, Peer position benchmark
Company momentum
3 signals
Company signal breadth, Company momentum score, Company ownership signal
Source trust
7 signals
Domain confidence, Intelligence completeness, Company description
47 additional source-backed evidence signals are counted in this page quality score.

Prospecting readiness

Women Influencers in Sport shows actionable prospecting fit based on person-level contact coverage, decision-maker coverage, people graph depth, and peer context.

55 / 100
Actionable prospecting fit Corroborated prospecting evidence

Prospecting evidence combines person-level contact coverage, decision-maker coverage, people graph depth, and peer context; raw contact values are hidden.

ICP fit
Research ICP fit

ICP fit combines company size, market specificity, and contactability; raw contact values are hidden.

50 / 100
Company size
11 employees
Employee estimate is in a common outbound prospecting range.
Market specificity
Tagged market profile
2 category and specialty signals in the company record.
Reachability
Mapped contact-channel evidence
Visible profile or company source data includes email and phone channels.
Account research checklist
Source-backed account research checklist

Account research checklist combines person-level contact coverage, ICP fit, related-company graph, domain trust, and people graph depth; raw contact values are hidden.

5 steps
Confirm contact coverage
Mapped contact-channel evidence
Visible profile or company source data includes email and phone channels.
Validate ICP fit
Research ICP fit
ICP fit combines company size, market specificity, and contactability; raw contact values are hidden.
Compare related peers
Limited peer comparison
Compares this company with related-company evidence across employee scale and peer graph evidence.
Check domain trust
Mixed domain alignment
Domain evidence combines website domain and social profile; raw email addresses are hidden.
Review people graph depth
Deep profile graph
4 mapped workforce signals against a 11 employee size estimate.
Contact coverage
Mapped contact-channel evidence
Visible profile or company source data includes email and phone channels.
Decision-maker coverage
Partial decision-maker reachability
Some mapped decision-maker signals include visible contact data.
People graph depth
Deep profile graph
4 mapped workforce signals against a 11 employee size estimate.
Peer context
Multi-signal peer benchmark evidence
Peer benchmark combines 8 related companies with peer graph strength, size benchmark, and size position. Underlying peer graph includes 4 evidence types: industry context, employee benchmarks, website records, social profiles.

Domain trust signals

Domain confidence for elon.edu is based on website domain and social profile.

35 / 100
Mixed domain alignment Limited domain evidence

Domain evidence combines website domain and social profile; raw email addresses are hidden.

Website domain
elon.edu
The official website domain is available from the company source record.
Social profile
LinkedIn organization page
A LinkedIn organization page is present for this company record.
Employee email mismatch: Visible employee email signals do not match the official domain.

AeroLeads coverage snapshot

Profile sample
4
Visible people attached to this company page.
Profile graph depth
Deep profile graph
4 mapped workforce signals against a 11 employee size estimate.
Contactable sample
2
Visible people with email or phone data.
Contact channel mix
Multi-channel contact coverage
Visible profile or company source data includes email and phone channels.
Contact evidence confidence
Mapped contact-channel evidence
Visible profile or company source data includes email and phone channels.
Email domain confidence
Non-official email coverage
Visible email signals use non-official domains only.
Domain confidence
Mixed domain alignment
Domain confidence for elon.edu is based on website domain and social profile.
Email usability mix
Professional email coverage sample
AeroLeads source data includes 4 unique visible email signals; 0 are marked current or verified and 2 are professional-type. Raw addresses are hidden.
Contact data safety
Limited privacy-safe contact intelligence
AeroLeads exposes contact counts, channel mix, freshness, and domain-alignment evidence while hiding raw email addresses and masking phone numbers in public output.
Company signal breadth
Two-signal company record
Company-level signals include social audience and ownership.
Company momentum score
Limited company momentum score
Momentum score blends contactability and peer position from AeroLeads company and profile evidence.
Company ownership signal
Company type signal
Company source record includes source type Educational.
Audience density
Low audience density
194 followers against 11 employee estimate, about 17.60 followers per estimated employee.
Specialty signals
1
Specialty tags in the company record.
Market specificity
Tagged market profile
2 category and specialty signals in the company record.
Peer industry clusters
4
Industries represented by related company records.
Related companies
8
Company graph links available for comparison.
Industry benchmark
Evidence-backed industry benchmark
Industry benchmark uses 8 related companies, 4 same-industry peers, 3 benchmark dimensions, and 4 peer evidence types from the AeroLeads related-company graph.
Peer benchmark confidence
Multi-signal peer benchmark evidence
Peer benchmark combines 8 related companies with peer graph strength, size benchmark, and size position. Underlying peer graph includes 4 evidence types: industry context, employee benchmarks, website records, social profiles.
Peer position benchmark
Employee-scale peer position benchmark
Peer-position benchmark shows employee scale above 0% of 8 comparable related peers.
Peer comparison matrix
Limited peer comparison
Compares this company with related-company evidence across employee scale and peer graph evidence.
Workforce locations
3
Locations represented in visible profile signals.
Workforce distribution
Multi-location workforce
Visible profile location signals span 3 locations, led by Charlotte, North Carolina, United States.
Workforce location footprint
Multi-city workforce footprint
Visible profile locations span 3 cities across 1 country, led by Charlotte.
Workforce distribution model
Multi-hub workforce model
Visible profile locations form multiple hubs across 3 locations, led by Charlotte, North Carolina, United States at 33%.
Workforce geography evidence confidence
Corroborated workforce geography evidence
Workforce geography spans 3 locations across 3 visible profile signals, with reachable evidence across 2 locations. Top workforce hub shares company country.
Contactable workforce locations
2
Workforce locations represented by visible contact samples.
Top contactable workforce location
Charlotte, North Carolina, United States
Visible contact samples span 2 workforce locations, led by Charlotte, North Carolina, United States.
Workforce seniority tiers
3
Seniority bands derived from visible profile titles and levels.
Seniority evidence confidence
Corroborated seniority evidence
Seniority graph spans 4 classified profile signals across 3 tiers, with reachable evidence for 2. Balanced management-to-IC sample.
Classified seniority profiles
4
Visible profiles with usable seniority signals.
Management-to-IC proxy
Balanced management-to-IC sample
2 managerial seniority signals and 2 contributor signals appear in the visible seniority-classified sample.
Role title diversity
Diverse role title sample
4 distinct role titles across 4 visible titled profiles.
Visible role titles
4
Distinct role titles found in visible profile signals.
Contactable role titles
2
Distinct role titles with visible contact samples.
Contactable role coverage
Mixed contactable role coverage
2 reachable role titles, led by Account Manager at Mom & Pop's Print at 50.0% of contactable titled profiles.
Decision-maker signals
2
Visible profiles matching seniority or leadership title patterns.
Decision-maker reachability
Partial decision-maker reachability
Some mapped decision-maker signals include visible contact data.
Decision-maker contactability rate
50
Percent of mapped decision-maker signals with visible contact data.
Prospecting fit
Actionable prospecting fit
Women Influencers in Sport shows actionable prospecting fit based on person-level contact coverage, decision-maker coverage, people graph depth, and peer context.
ICP fit
Research ICP fit
Women Influencers in Sport matches the research ICP fit band for common outbound filters based on company size, market specificity, and contactability.
Account research checklist
Source-backed account research checklist
Account research checklist combines person-level contact coverage, ICP fit, related-company graph, domain trust, and people graph depth; raw contact values are hidden.
Intelligence signal groups
14
AeroLeads signal groups available for this company.

Market focus signals

Primary industry
Spectator Sports
Market specificity
Tagged market profile
2 category and specialty signals in the company record.
Market evidence tier
High-confidence market evidence
Market evidence combines 6 classification signals from categories, specialties, related peer industries, and description keywords. 6 description-backed keyword signals are included.
Industry benchmark
Evidence-backed industry benchmark
Industry benchmark uses 8 related companies, 4 same-industry peers, 3 benchmark dimensions, and 4 peer evidence types from the AeroLeads related-company graph.
Top peer industry
Spectator Sports
50% of 8 related peer industry signals.
Peer benchmark evidence
Multi-signal peer benchmark evidence
Peer benchmark combines 8 related companies with peer graph strength, size benchmark, and size position. Underlying peer graph includes 4 evidence types: industry context, employee benchmarks, website records, social profiles.
Size position
Smaller than most related peers
8 of 8 related employee-estimated peers are higher.
Peer graph strength
Benchmark-ready peer graph
Related peer graph has industry context, employee benchmarks, website records, and social profiles across 8 related companies.
Benchmark dimensions: peer graph strength, size benchmark, and size position.
Categories
Spectator Sports
Specialties
Big 12 Conference
Product-market keyword evidence
Description-backed market keywords
Keyword evidence comes from 3 source field groups: Category, Specialty, Description.
Product-market keyword evidence tier: High-confidence product-market keyword evidence. Product-market keyword evidence combines 8 unique market keywords, 3 source field groups, and 6 description-backed keywords (1 category, 1 specialty, and 6 description).
Spectator Sports Ā· Category Big 12 Conference Ā· Specialty female students Ā· Description successful leaders Ā· Description education engagement Ā· Description wins seeks Ā· Description diverse classroom workforce Ā· Description community changingthegamewins Ā· Description
Related peer industries
Peer-industry evidence tier: High-confidence peer-industry evidence. Peer-industry evidence combines 8 related companies, 4 peer-industry clusters, and top peer industry Spectator Sports at 50.0%.
Spectator Sports 4 peers
50.0% of related peer industries
Financial Services 2 peers
25.0% of related peer industries
Banking 1 peer
12.5% of related peer industries
Media and Telecommunications 1 peer
12.5% of related peer industries

Company signals

Company signal breadth
Two-signal company record
Company-level signals include social audience and ownership.
Corroborated company record evidence: Company record evidence combines 2 source-backed company signal types: social audience and ownership.
Social audience
194
Followers in the company source record.
Social audience evidence tier: Limited social-audience evidence. Social audience evidence uses 194 followers from source field social_followers.
Audience density
Low audience density
194 followers against 11 employee estimate, about 17.60 followers per estimated employee.
Audience-density evidence tier: Limited audience-density evidence. Audience-density evidence combines 194 social followers, 11 employee estimate, and 17.60 followers per estimated employee.
Company ownership
Company type signal
Company source record includes source type Educational.
Company ownership evidence tier: Structured ownership evidence. Ownership evidence combines source type Educational from structured company source fields.

Workforce seniority mix

Aggregated from 4 classified profile signals.

Largest seniority band
Individual contributor
2 of 4 classified profile signals, 1 with visible contact data.
Corroborated seniority evidence: Seniority graph spans 4 classified profile signals across 3 tiers, with reachable evidence for 2. Balanced management-to-IC sample.
Management-to-IC proxy
Balanced management-to-IC sample
50.0%
managerial seniority signals
50.0%
contributor seniority signals
2 managerial seniority signals and 2 contributor signals appear in the visible seniority-classified sample.
Management-shape evidence tier: Balanced management-shape evidence. Management-shape evidence combines 4 seniority-classified signals, 2 managerial signals, 50.0% managerial share, and 2 contributor signals.
Individual contributor 2 profiles
50.0% of classified seniority signals, 1 with visible contact data
Director 1 profile
25.0% of classified seniority signals
Manager 1 profile
25.0% of classified seniority signals, 1 with visible contact data

Workforce geography

Aggregated from 3 visible profile location signals.

Workforce geography evidence
Corroborated workforce geography evidence
Workforce geography spans 3 locations across 3 visible profile signals, with reachable evidence across 2 locations. Top workforce hub shares company country.
Distribution signal
Multi-location workforce
Visible profile location signals span 3 locations, led by Charlotte, North Carolina, United States.
Workforce distribution model
Multi-hub workforce model
Visible profile locations form multiple hubs across 3 locations, led by Charlotte, North Carolina, United States at 33%.
Corroborated workforce model evidence: Workforce model evidence combines 3 located profile signals, 3 workforce locations, 3 cities, 1 country, top hub Charlotte, North Carolina, United States at 33%, company-location alignment, and 2 reachable locations.
Locations
3
Countries
1
Top hub share
33%
Workforce location footprint
Multi-city workforce footprint
Visible profile locations span 3 cities across 1 country, led by Charlotte.
Cities
3
Countries
1
Company-location alignment
Top workforce hub shares company country
The largest visible workforce location is Charlotte, North Carolina, United States, in the same country as company location Elon, North Carolina, United States.
Top workforce hub share: 33.3%
Company-location evidence tier: Corroborated company-location alignment evidence. Company-location alignment evidence combines company location Elon, North Carolina, United States, top workforce hub Charlotte, North Carolina, United States, 33.3% top workforce hub share, and country match.
Contactable location spread
Multi-location contact coverage
Visible contact samples span 2 workforce locations, led by Charlotte, North Carolina, United States.
Contactable location evidence tier: Multi-location contactable evidence. Contactable location evidence combines 2 contactable profile location signals, 2 workforce locations, top contactable hub Charlotte, North Carolina, United States at 50.0%, and company-location alignment.
Contactable workforce hub shares company country: The largest contactable workforce location is Charlotte, North Carolina, United States, in the same country as company location Elon, North Carolina, United States. Top contactable hub share: 50.0%.
Charlotte, North Carolina, United States 1 contact
50.0% of contactable location signals
Greater Orlando, United States 1 contact
50.0% of contactable location signals
Charlotte, North Carolina, United States 1 profile
33.3% of visible location signals
Pompano Beach, Florida, United States 1 profile
33.3% of visible location signals
Greater Orlando, United States 1 profile
33.3% of visible location signals

Decision-maker coverage

2 seniority signals, 1 with visible contact data.

Decision-maker evidence tier
Mapped decision-maker evidence
Decision-maker evidence covers 2 seniority signals, 1 reachable.
Partial decision-maker reachability 50.0%
Some mapped decision-maker signals include visible contact data.
Decision-maker reachability evidence tier: Partial decision-maker reachability evidence. Decision-maker reachability evidence combines 1 contactable decision-maker signal, 2 mapped decision-maker signals, 50.0% contactability, and 1 dual-channel signal.
Email and phone decision-maker coverage: Mapped decision-maker signals include 1 email signal, 1 phone signal, and 1 with both channels.
Most reachable seniority
Manager
1 of 1 seniority signals include visible contact data.
Seniority reachability evidence tier: Mapped seniority reachability evidence. Seniority reachability evidence combines 1 contactable Manager signal, 1 Manager signal, 100.0% tier contactability, and email and phone coverage.
Director 1 profile
50.0% of mapped seniority signals
Manager 1 profile
50.0% of mapped seniority signals, 1 with visible contact data

Role and function mix

4 visible titled profiles across 4 distinct role titles.

Title mix
Diverse role title sample
4 distinct role titles across 4 visible titled profiles.
Role-title evidence tier: Diverse role-title evidence. Role-title diversity evidence combines 4 visible titled profiles, 4 distinct role titles, and top title Account Manager at Mom & Pop's Print at 25.0%.
Contactable role coverage
Mixed contactable role coverage
2 reachable role titles, led by Account Manager at Mom & Pop's Print at 50.0% of contactable titled profiles.
Contactable role evidence tier: Corroborated contactable role evidence. Contactable role evidence combines 2 contactable titled profiles, 2 reachable role titles, and top reachable role Account Manager at Mom & Pop's Print at 50.0%.
Role title reachability
Partial role-title reachability
2 of 4 distinct visible role titles include email or phone signals.
Role-title reachability evidence tier: Corroborated role-title reachability evidence. Role-title reachability evidence combines 4 visible role titles, 2 reachable titles, and 50.0% title reachability.
Account Manager at Mom & Pop's Print 1 profile
25.0% of visible titled profiles
Assistant Director of Athletics 1 profile
25.0% of visible titled profiles
Student Athlete at Elon University 1 profile
25.0% of visible titled profiles
šŸ”„ Commercial Real Estate Expert 1 profile
25.0% of visible titled profiles

Contactability signals

Contactability score 50.0%
2 of 4 visible profiles include email or phone signals.
Contact channel mix
Multi-channel contact coverage
Visible profile or company source data includes email and phone channels.
Contact evidence tier
Mapped contact-channel evidence
Visible profile or company source data includes email and phone channels.
Contact data safety
Limited privacy-safe contact intelligence
AeroLeads exposes contact counts, channel mix, freshness, and domain-alignment evidence while hiding raw email addresses and masking phone numbers in public output.
Aggregate signals
2
Channel coverage
Email and phone aggregate coverage
Evidence groups
1
Limited contact-safety evidence: Contact-safety evidence combines visible profile contact sample; public schema uses aggregate variables only.
Aggregate-only contact schema: Dataset variables use counts, rates, channel labels, freshness bands, and domain-alignment metrics instead of raw contact values.
Email usability mix
Professional email coverage sample
AeroLeads source data includes 4 unique visible email signals; 0 are marked current or verified and 2 are professional-type. Raw addresses are hidden.
Email usability evidence tier: Sample email usability evidence. Email usability evidence combines 4 unique email signals and 2 professional-type; raw addresses are hidden.
0 current or verified 2 professional-type 0.0% current signal rate
Visible people
4
With contact data
2
Email coverage
2
50.0% of visible profiles
Phone coverage
1
25.0% of visible profiles

Email domain intelligence

0 of 4 visible email signals match elon.edu.

Non-official email coverage: Visible email signals use non-official domains only.
Email identity evidence tier: Non-official email identity evidence. Email identity evidence combines 4 visible email signals, 3 other-domain signals, and 1 personal-domain signal.
0.0% domain match 0 people with official-domain email 4 non-official email signals

Explore related pages

Related company intelligence:

To empower female students to be successful leaders in sport through education, engagement, and meaningful connection; in doing so, WINS seeks to create a more diverse classroom, workforce, and sport community. #changingthegameWINS

Company source details

Employees
11
Address
Elon, North Carolina, United States
Industry
Spectator Sports
NAICS
Spectator Sports
Other Spectator Sports
Website
www.elon.edu
Keywords
Big 12 Conference.
HQ
Elon, NC
Related companies
Citizens, Financial Services Regulatory Authority of Ontario (FSRA), Big 12 Conference, Trenton Thunder, Worcester Railers HC, Atlas, Rising Phoenix, Atlanta Vibe Pro Volleyball.
Explore visible people signals for Women Influencers in Sport by role, title, or keyword.

2 of 4 visible profiles include email or phone signals in AeroLeads.

Women Influencers in Sport Questions

Women Influencers in Sport people graph sample