外務省
Company intelligence

外務省 Company Intelligence, Employees & Contact Signals

Contact coverage
Email-led
Visible profile or company source data is strongest for email outreach. 3 visible profiles include direct contact evidence.
People graph depth
4 signals
4 mapped workforce signals against a 256 employee size estimate.
Account research
5 steps
Account research checklist combines person-level contact coverage, ICP fit, related-company graph, domain trust, and people graph depth; raw contact values are hidden.
Email domain match
60% match
Official-domain coverage across 3 of 5 visible email signals for mofa.go.jp.
Evidence quality 100/100 Priority intelligence record

AeroLeads company intelligence

外務省 workforce and contactability signals

Evidence from AeroLeads company records, matched professional profiles, and related company graph.

High confidence
Intelligence completeness
Partial intelligence record
6 of 11 major intelligence groups are available for this company.
Profile graph
Sample profile graph
4 mapped workforce signals against a 256 employee size estimate.
Top seniority band
Director
2 of 3 classified profile signals.
Visible contact sample
3
Displayed people with email or phone data.
Social followers
493
Audience size from company social data.

Profile graph researchability

Visible people graph includes 4 visible people: 4 named, 3 titled, 4 located, and 3 contactable.

Profile research sample
Profile coverage evidence tier: Sample profile coverage evidence. Profile coverage evidence combines 4 mapped workforce signals, 256 employee size estimate, and 1.6% profile graph coverage.
Corroborated profile graph evidence: Researchability is based on 4 visible people with 4 populated evidence dimensions: named, titled, located, and contactable signals.
Profile association confidence: Corroborated profile association. Association confidence combines 3 titled profiles, 3 official-domain email profiles, 3 titled profiles with official-domain email, 3 located profiles with official-domain email, and 3 contactable profiles.
People
4
Named
4
Titled
3
Located
4
Contactable
3

Data methodology

AeroLeads renders only source-backed fields for this company page.

5 source groups
Company record Matched profile graph Email-pattern aggregate Related company graph Company signal fields
Blank source fields are omitted
Related companies are ordered deterministically
Structured data uses aggregate counts only

Intelligence completeness

6 of 11 major intelligence groups are available for this company.

6 / 11 groups
Partial intelligence record 54.5%
Workforce composition Contactability Email intelligence Decision makers Domain confidence Market and peer context

Evidence quality

This page clears the 60+ AeroLeads company-intelligence evidence threshold.

100 / 100
Priority intelligence record Threshold 60+
Employee email coverage Role title reachability Official-domain role title reachability Decision-maker coverage Email usability mix Related company graph
Contactability
9 signals
Employee email coverage, Email usability mix, Contact channel mix
Workforce graph
20 signals
Role title reachability, Official-domain role title reachability, Profile graph researchability
Decision-maker intelligence
5 signals
Decision-maker coverage, Decision-maker reachability, Decision-maker channel mix
Market and peer context
12 signals
Related company graph, Peer graph strength, Peer position benchmark
Company momentum
2 signals
Company signal breadth, Company momentum score
Source trust
8 signals
Domain confidence, Multi-source domain alignment, Intelligence completeness
50 additional source-backed evidence signals are counted in this page quality score.

Prospecting readiness

外務省 shows actionable prospecting fit based on person-level contact coverage, decision-maker coverage, people graph depth, and peer context.

55 / 100
Actionable prospecting fit Corroborated prospecting evidence

Prospecting evidence combines person-level contact coverage, decision-maker coverage, people graph depth, and peer context; raw contact values are hidden.

ICP fit
Qualified ICP fit

ICP fit combines company size, market specificity, contactability, and domain trust; raw contact values are hidden.

60 / 100
Company size
256 employees
Employee estimate is in a common outbound prospecting range.
Market specificity
Peer-informed market profile
5 related peer industry clusters available.
Reachability
Current email evidence
1 current or verified email signal available; raw addresses are hidden.
Domain trust
High-confidence domain alignment
Domain evidence combines website domain, social profile, employee email alignment, profile-domain association, and profile association confidence; raw email addresses are hidden.
Account research checklist
Source-backed account research checklist

Account research checklist combines person-level contact coverage, ICP fit, related-company graph, domain trust, and people graph depth; raw contact values are hidden.

5 steps
Confirm contact coverage
Current email evidence
1 current or verified email signal available; raw addresses are hidden.
Validate ICP fit
Qualified ICP fit
ICP fit combines company size, market specificity, contactability, and domain trust; raw contact values are hidden.
Compare related peers
Limited peer comparison
Compares this company with related-company evidence across employee scale and peer graph evidence.
Check domain trust
High-confidence domain alignment
Domain evidence combines website domain, social profile, employee email alignment, profile-domain association, and profile association confidence; raw email addresses are hidden.
Review people graph depth
Sample profile graph
4 mapped workforce signals against a 256 employee size estimate.
Contact coverage
Current email evidence
1 current or verified email signal available; raw addresses are hidden.
Decision-maker coverage
High decision-maker reachability
Most mapped decision-maker signals include visible contact data.
People graph depth
Sample profile graph
4 mapped workforce signals against a 256 employee size estimate.
Peer context
Multi-signal peer benchmark evidence
Peer benchmark combines 10 related companies with peer graph strength, size benchmark, and size position. Underlying peer graph includes 3 evidence types: employee benchmarks, website records, social profiles.

Domain trust signals

Domain confidence for mofa.go.jp is based on website domain, social profile, employee email alignment, profile-domain association, and profile association confidence.

80 / 100
High-confidence domain alignment High-confidence domain evidence

Domain evidence combines website domain, social profile, employee email alignment, profile-domain association, and profile association confidence; raw email addresses are hidden.

Website domain
mofa.go.jp
The official website domain is available from the company source record.
Social profile
LinkedIn organization page
A LinkedIn organization page is present for this company record.
Employee email alignment
3 official-domain email signals
60% of visible employee email signals match mofa.go.jp; raw addresses are hidden.
Profile-domain association
3 people with official-domain email
Matched people include official-domain email evidence; raw addresses are hidden.
Profile association confidence
3 titled official-domain profiles
Titled profile samples also include official-domain email evidence.

AeroLeads coverage snapshot

Profile sample
4
Visible people attached to this company page.
Profile graph depth
Sample profile graph
4 mapped workforce signals against a 256 employee size estimate.
Contactable sample
3
Visible people with email or phone data.
Contact channel mix
Email-led contact coverage
Visible profile or company source data is strongest for email outreach.
Contact evidence confidence
Current email evidence
1 current or verified email signal available; raw addresses are hidden.
Official-domain emails
3
Email signals matching mofa.go.jp.
Email domain confidence
Mixed-domain coverage
Visible email signals include official-domain and non-official domains.
Domain confidence
High-confidence domain alignment
Domain confidence for mofa.go.jp is based on website domain, social profile, employee email alignment, profile-domain association, and profile association confidence.
Email usability mix
Professional email coverage sample
AeroLeads source data includes 5 unique visible email signals; 1 is marked current or verified and 4 are professional-type. Raw addresses are hidden.
Contact data safety
Limited privacy-safe contact intelligence
AeroLeads exposes contact counts, channel mix, freshness, and domain-alignment evidence while hiding raw email addresses and masking phone numbers in public output.
Company signal breadth
Two-signal company record
Company-level signals include social audience and company maturity.
Company momentum score
Limited company momentum score
Momentum score blends contactability and peer position from AeroLeads company and profile evidence.
Audience density
Low audience density
493 followers against 256 employee estimate, about 1.90 followers per estimated employee.
Specialty signals
1
Specialty tags in the company record.
Market specificity
Peer-informed market profile
5 related peer industry clusters available.
Peer industry clusters
6
Industries represented by related company records.
Related companies
10
Company graph links available for comparison.
Industry benchmark
Peer-informed industry benchmark
Industry benchmark uses 10 related companies, 3 benchmark dimensions, and 3 peer evidence types from the AeroLeads related-company graph.
Peer benchmark confidence
Multi-signal peer benchmark evidence
Peer benchmark combines 10 related companies with peer graph strength, size benchmark, and size position. Underlying peer graph includes 3 evidence types: employee benchmarks, website records, social profiles.
Peer position benchmark
Employee-scale peer position benchmark
Peer-position benchmark shows employee scale above 22.2% of 9 comparable related peers.
Peer comparison matrix
Limited peer comparison
Compares this company with related-company evidence across employee scale and peer graph evidence.
Workforce locations
3
Locations represented in visible profile signals.
Workforce distribution
Multi-location workforce
Visible profile location signals span 3 locations, led by Japan.
Workforce location footprint
Multi-country workforce footprint
Visible profile locations span 3 cities across 2 countries, led by Japan.
Workforce distribution model
International distributed workforce model
Visible profile locations span 2 countries and 3 workforce locations; no single hub exceeds 50% of visible location signals.
Workforce geography evidence confidence
High-confidence workforce geography evidence
Workforce geography spans 3 locations across 4 visible profile signals, with reachable evidence across 3 locations and company-domain evidence across 3 locations. Top workforce hub differs from company location.
Contactable workforce locations
3
Workforce locations represented by visible contact samples.
Top contactable workforce location
Tokyo, Japan
Visible contact samples span 3 workforce locations, led by Tokyo, Japan.
Workforce seniority tiers
2
Seniority bands derived from visible profile titles and levels.
Seniority evidence confidence
Corroborated seniority evidence
Seniority graph spans 3 classified profile signals across 2 tiers, with reachable evidence for 3 and company-domain evidence for 3. Leadership-heavy visible sample.
Classified seniority profiles
3
Visible profiles with usable seniority signals.
Official-domain seniority profiles
Multi-profile official-domain seniority evidence
3 seniority-classified profiles across 2 tiers include company-domain email signals.
Management-to-IC proxy
Leadership-heavy visible sample
2 managerial seniority signals and 1 contributor signal appear in the visible seniority-classified sample.
Role title diversity
Diverse role title sample
3 distinct role titles across 3 visible titled profiles.
Visible role titles
3
Distinct role titles found in visible profile signals.
Contactable role titles
3
Distinct role titles with visible contact samples.
Contactable role coverage
Diverse contactable role coverage
3 reachable role titles across 3 contactable titled profiles.
Decision-maker signals
2
Visible profiles matching seniority or leadership title patterns.
Decision-maker reachability
High decision-maker reachability
Most mapped decision-maker signals include visible contact data.
Decision-maker contactability rate
100
Percent of mapped decision-maker signals with visible contact data.
Official-domain decision-maker coverage
Strong official-domain decision-maker coverage
Most contactable decision-maker signals use mofa.go.jp email coverage.
Official-domain decision-maker contacts
2
Contactable decision-maker signals with official-domain email coverage.
Prospecting fit
Actionable prospecting fit
外務省 shows actionable prospecting fit based on person-level contact coverage, decision-maker coverage, people graph depth, and peer context.
ICP fit
Qualified ICP fit
外務省 matches the qualified ICP fit band for common outbound filters based on company size, market specificity, contactability, and domain trust.
Account research checklist
Source-backed account research checklist
Account research checklist combines person-level contact coverage, ICP fit, related-company graph, domain trust, and people graph depth; raw contact values are hidden.
Intelligence signal groups
13
AeroLeads signal groups available for this company.

Market focus signals

Market specificity
Peer-informed market profile
5 related peer industry clusters available.
Market evidence tier
Corroborated market evidence
Market evidence combines 6 classification signals from specialties and related peer industries.
Industry benchmark
Peer-informed industry benchmark
Industry benchmark uses 10 related companies, 3 benchmark dimensions, and 3 peer evidence types from the AeroLeads related-company graph.
Top peer industry
International Affairs
40% of 10 related peer industry signals.
Peer benchmark evidence
Multi-signal peer benchmark evidence
Peer benchmark combines 10 related companies with peer graph strength, size benchmark, and size position. Underlying peer graph includes 3 evidence types: employee benchmarks, website records, social profiles.
Size position
Smaller than most related peers
7 of 9 related employee-estimated peers are higher.
Peer graph strength
Partial peer evidence graph
Related peer graph has employee benchmarks, website records, and social profiles across 10 related companies.
Benchmark dimensions: peer graph strength, size benchmark, and size position.
Specialties
Nagata-cho
Product-market keyword evidence
Limited market keywords
Keyword evidence comes from 1 source field group: Specialty.
Product-market keyword evidence tier: Limited product-market keyword evidence. Product-market keyword evidence combines 1 unique market keyword and 1 source field group (1 specialty).
Nagata-cho · Specialty
Related peer industries
Peer-industry evidence tier: High-confidence peer-industry evidence. Peer-industry evidence combines 10 related companies, 5 peer-industry clusters, and top peer industry International Affairs at 40.0%.
International Affairs 4 peers
40.0% of related peer industries
Government Relations Services 2 peers
20.0% of related peer industries
Civic and Social Organizations 1 peer
10.0% of related peer industries
Government Administration 1 peer
10.0% of related peer industries
Executive Offices 1 peer
10.0% of related peer industries

Company signals

Company signal breadth
Two-signal company record
Company-level signals include social audience and company maturity.
Corroborated company record evidence: Company record evidence combines 2 source-backed company signal types: social audience and company maturity.
Social audience
493
Followers in the company source record.
Social audience evidence tier: Limited social-audience evidence. Social audience evidence uses 493 followers from source field social_followers.
Audience density
Low audience density
493 followers against 256 employee estimate, about 1.90 followers per estimated employee.
Audience-density evidence tier: Limited audience-density evidence. Audience-density evidence combines 493 social followers, 256 employee estimate, and 1.90 followers per estimated employee.
Company maturity
Established company record
Company source record includes founding year 1869, about 157 years before 2026.
Company maturity evidence tier: Long-running maturity evidence. Maturity evidence combines founding year 1869, 157 years of company history, and source field founded.

Workforce seniority mix

Aggregated from 3 classified profile signals.

Largest seniority band
Director
2 of 3 classified profile signals, 2 with visible contact data, 2 official-domain.
Multi-profile official-domain seniority evidence: 3 seniority-classified profiles across 2 tiers include company-domain email signals.
Corroborated seniority evidence: Seniority graph spans 3 classified profile signals across 2 tiers, with reachable evidence for 3 and company-domain evidence for 3. Leadership-heavy visible sample.
Management-to-IC proxy
Leadership-heavy visible sample
66.7%
managerial seniority signals
33.3%
contributor seniority signals
2 managerial seniority signals and 1 contributor signal appear in the visible seniority-classified sample.
Management-shape evidence tier: Leadership-heavy management-shape evidence. Management-shape evidence combines 3 seniority-classified signals, 2 managerial signals, 66.7% managerial share, and 1 contributor signal.
Director 2 profiles
66.7% of classified seniority signals, 2 with visible contact data, 2 official-domain
Individual contributor 1 profile
33.3% of classified seniority signals, 1 with visible contact data, 1 official-domain

Workforce geography

Aggregated from 4 visible profile location signals.

Workforce geography evidence
High-confidence workforce geography evidence
Workforce geography spans 3 locations across 4 visible profile signals, with reachable evidence across 3 locations and company-domain evidence across 3 locations. Top workforce hub differs from company location.
Distribution signal
Multi-location workforce
Visible profile location signals span 3 locations, led by Japan.
Workforce distribution model
International distributed workforce model
Visible profile locations span 2 countries and 3 workforce locations; no single hub exceeds 50% of visible location signals.
High-confidence workforce model evidence: Workforce model evidence combines 4 located profile signals, 3 workforce locations, 3 cities, 2 countries, top hub Japan at 50%, company-location alignment, 3 reachable locations, and 3 company-domain locations.
Locations
3
Countries
2
Top hub share
50%
Workforce location footprint
Multi-country workforce footprint
Visible profile locations span 3 cities across 2 countries, led by Japan.
Cities
3
Countries
2
Company-location alignment
Top workforce hub differs from company location
The largest visible workforce location is Japan, while the company location is 千代田区, 東京都, Jp.
Top workforce hub share: 50.0%
Company-location evidence tier: Workforce-location divergence evidence. Company-location alignment evidence combines company location 千代田区, 東京都, Jp, top workforce hub Japan, 50.0% top workforce hub share, and location difference.
Contactable location spread
Multi-location contact coverage
Visible contact samples span 3 workforce locations, led by Tokyo, Japan.
Contactable location evidence tier: High-confidence contactable location evidence. Contactable location evidence combines 3 contactable profile location signals, 3 workforce locations, top contactable hub Tokyo, Japan at 33.3%, and company-location alignment.
Contactable workforce hub differs from company location: The largest contactable workforce location is Tokyo, Japan, while the company location is 千代田区, 東京都, Jp. Top contactable hub share: 33.3%.
Tokyo, Japan 1 contact
33.3% of contactable location signals
Washington, District of Columbia, United States 1 contact
33.3% of contactable location signals
Japan 1 contact
33.3% of contactable location signals
Official-domain location spread
Multi-location official-domain workforce
Company-domain email profile locations span 3 workforce locations, led by Tokyo, Japan.
3 profiles with mofa.go.jp email evidence include location signals.
Official-domain location evidence tier: High-confidence official-domain location evidence. Official-domain location evidence combines 3 official-domain profile location signals, 3 workforce locations, top official-domain hub Tokyo, Japan at 33.3%, and company-location alignment.
Official-domain workforce hub differs from company location: The largest company-domain email workforce location is Tokyo, Japan, while the company location is 千代田区, 東京都, Jp. Top official-domain hub share: 33.3%.
Tokyo, Japan 1 profile
33.3% of official-domain location signals
Washington, District of Columbia, United States 1 profile
33.3% of official-domain location signals
Japan 1 profile
33.3% of official-domain location signals
Japan 2 profiles
50.0% of visible location signals
Tokyo, Japan 1 profile
25.0% of visible location signals
Washington, District of Columbia, United States 1 profile
25.0% of visible location signals

Decision-maker coverage

2 seniority signals, 2 with visible contact data.

Decision-maker evidence tier
Corroborated decision-maker evidence
Decision-maker evidence covers 2 seniority signals, 2 reachable, and 2 company-domain.
High decision-maker reachability 100.0%
Most mapped decision-maker signals include visible contact data.
Decision-maker reachability evidence tier: High decision-maker reachability evidence. Decision-maker reachability evidence combines 2 contactable decision-maker signals, 2 mapped decision-maker signals, 100.0% contactability, and 2 official-domain decision-maker signals.
Email-led decision-maker coverage: Mapped decision-maker contact data is strongest for email, with 2 email signals.
Most reachable seniority
Director
2 of 2 seniority signals include visible contact data.
Seniority reachability evidence tier: High-confidence seniority reachability evidence. Seniority reachability evidence combines 2 contactable Director signals, 2 Director signals, 100.0% tier contactability, 2 official-domain Director signals, and email coverage.
Official-domain decision-maker coverage
Strong official-domain decision-maker coverage
2 contactable decision-maker signals match mofa.go.jp. Most contactable decision-maker signals use mofa.go.jp email coverage.
Official-domain decision-maker evidence tier: Strong official-domain decision-maker evidence. Official-domain decision-maker evidence combines 2 official-domain decision-maker signals, 2 contactable decision-maker signals, 100.0% official-domain coverage, and mofa.go.jp domain match.
Director 2 profiles
100.0% of mapped seniority signals, 2 with visible contact data

Role and function mix

3 visible titled profiles across 3 distinct role titles.

Title mix
Diverse role title sample
3 distinct role titles across 3 visible titled profiles.
Role-title evidence tier: Diverse role-title evidence. Role-title diversity evidence combines 3 visible titled profiles, 3 distinct role titles, and top title Director of Central and South Eastern at 33.3%.
Contactable role coverage
Diverse contactable role coverage
3 reachable role titles across 3 contactable titled profiles.
Contactable role evidence tier: Diverse contactable role evidence. Contactable role evidence combines 3 contactable titled profiles, 3 reachable role titles, and top reachable role Director of Central and South Eastern at 33.3%.
Role title reachability
Full role-title reachability
3 of 3 distinct visible role titles include email or phone signals.
Role-title reachability evidence tier: High-confidence role-title reachability evidence. Role-title reachability evidence combines 3 visible role titles, 3 reachable titles, 100.0% title reachability, and 3 official-domain titles.
Full official-domain role-title reachability 3 / 3 titles
3 of 3 distinct visible role titles include email signals matching mofa.go.jp.
Director of Central and South Eastern 1 profile
33.3% of visible titled profiles
Director of Medical Clinic Ministry 1 profile
33.3% of visible titled profiles
Mitsui Fudosan 1 profile
33.3% of visible titled profiles

Contactability signals

Contactability score 75.0%
3 of 4 visible profiles include email or phone signals.
Contact channel mix
Email-led contact coverage
Visible profile or company source data is strongest for email outreach.
Contact evidence tier
Current email evidence
1 current or verified email signal available; raw addresses are hidden.
Contact data safety
Limited privacy-safe contact intelligence
AeroLeads exposes contact counts, channel mix, freshness, and domain-alignment evidence while hiding raw email addresses and masking phone numbers in public output.
Aggregate signals
3
Channel coverage
Email aggregate coverage
Evidence groups
2
Limited contact-safety evidence: Contact-safety evidence combines visible profile contact sample and current email metadata; public schema uses aggregate variables only.
Aggregate-only contact schema: Dataset variables use counts, rates, channel labels, freshness bands, and domain-alignment metrics instead of raw contact values.
Email usability mix
Professional email coverage sample
AeroLeads source data includes 5 unique visible email signals; 1 is marked current or verified and 4 are professional-type. Raw addresses are hidden.
Email usability evidence tier: Current email usability evidence. Email usability evidence combines 5 unique email signals, 1 current or verified, 4 professional-type, and 20.0% current signal rate; raw addresses are hidden.
1 current or verified 4 professional-type 20.0% current signal rate
Visible people
4
With contact data
3
Email coverage
3
75.0% of visible profiles

Email domain intelligence

3 of 5 visible email signals match mofa.go.jp.

Mixed-domain coverage: Visible email signals include official-domain and non-official domains.
Email identity evidence tier: Corroborated email identity evidence. Email identity evidence combines 5 visible email signals, 3 matching mofa.go.jp, 3 people with official-domain email, 60.0% official-domain match, 1 other-domain signal, and 1 personal-domain signal.
60.0% domain match 3 people with official-domain email 2 non-official email signals

外務省 Questions

外務省 people graph sample