Kea Conservation Trust

Kea Conservation Trust Company Intelligence, Employees & Contact Signals

Contact coverage
Email + phone
Visible profile or company source data includes email and phone channels. 1 visible profile includes direct contact evidence.
People graph depth
2 signals
Deep profile graph across 1 mapped department.
Account research
5 steps
Account research checklist combines person-level contact coverage, ICP fit, related-company graph, domain trust, and people graph depth; raw contact values are hidden.
Social audience
142
Audience size from company social follower data.
Evidence quality 100/100 Priority intelligence record

AeroLeads company intelligence

Kea Conservation Trust workforce and contactability signals

Evidence from AeroLeads company records, matched professional profiles, and related company graph.

High confidence
Intelligence completeness
Partial intelligence record
6 of 11 major intelligence groups are available for this company.
Largest mapped team
General
2 profile signals in General.
Departments mapped
1
Workforce composition from AeroLeads profile data.
Profile graph
Deep profile graph
2 mapped workforce signals against a 6 employee size estimate.
Top seniority band
Senior / Lead
2 of 5 classified profile signals.
Visible contact sample
1
Displayed people with email or phone data.
Social followers
142
Audience size from company social data.

Profile graph researchability

Visible people graph includes 5 visible people: 5 named, 5 titled, 4 located, and 1 contactable.

Multi-signal profile graph
Profile coverage evidence tier: Deep profile coverage evidence. Profile coverage evidence combines 2 mapped workforce signals, 6 employee size estimate, and 33.3% profile graph coverage.
Corroborated profile graph evidence: Researchability is based on 5 visible people with 4 populated evidence dimensions: named, titled, located, and contactable signals.
Profile association confidence: Profile association sample. Association confidence combines 5 titled profiles and 1 contactable profile.
People
5
Named
5
Titled
5
Located
4
Contactable
1

Data methodology

AeroLeads renders only source-backed fields for this company page.

5 source groups
Company record Matched profile graph Email-pattern aggregate Related company graph Company signal fields
Blank source fields are omitted
Related companies are ordered deterministically
Structured data uses aggregate counts only

Intelligence completeness

6 of 11 major intelligence groups are available for this company.

6 / 11 groups
Partial intelligence record 54.5%
Workforce composition Contactability Email intelligence Decision makers Domain confidence Market and peer context

Evidence quality

This page clears the 60+ AeroLeads company-intelligence evidence threshold.

100 / 100
Priority intelligence record Threshold 60+
Workforce composition Employee email coverage Employee phone coverage Decision-maker coverage Email usability mix Related company graph
Workforce graph
13 signals
Workforce composition, Profile graph researchability, Workforce location footprint
Contactability
6 signals
Employee email coverage, Employee phone coverage, Email usability mix
Decision-maker intelligence
5 signals
Decision-maker coverage, Decision-maker reachability, Decision-maker channel mix
Market and peer context
14 signals
Related company graph, Peer graph strength, Peer position benchmark
Company momentum
3 signals
Company signal breadth, Company momentum score, Company ownership signal
Source trust
8 signals
Domain confidence, Intelligence completeness, Company description
43 additional source-backed evidence signals are counted in this page quality score.

Prospecting readiness

Kea Conservation Trust shows actionable prospecting fit based on person-level contact coverage, decision-maker coverage, people graph depth, and peer context.

55 / 100
Actionable prospecting fit Corroborated prospecting evidence

Prospecting evidence combines person-level contact coverage, decision-maker coverage, people graph depth, and peer context; raw contact values are hidden.

ICP fit
Research ICP fit

ICP fit combines company size, market specificity, and contactability; raw contact values are hidden.

43 / 100
Company size
6 employees
Employee estimate is available for ICP filtering.
Market specificity
Tagged market profile
2 category and specialty signals in the company record.
Reachability
Mapped contact-channel evidence
Visible profile or company source data includes email and phone channels.
Account research checklist
Source-backed account research checklist

Account research checklist combines person-level contact coverage, ICP fit, related-company graph, domain trust, and people graph depth; raw contact values are hidden.

5 steps
Confirm contact coverage
Mapped contact-channel evidence
Visible profile or company source data includes email and phone channels.
Validate ICP fit
Research ICP fit
ICP fit combines company size, market specificity, and contactability; raw contact values are hidden.
Compare related peers
Limited peer comparison
Compares this company with related-company evidence across employee scale and peer graph evidence.
Check domain trust
Mixed domain alignment
Domain evidence combines website domain and social profile; raw email addresses are hidden.
Review people graph depth
Deep profile graph
2 mapped workforce signals against a 6 employee size estimate.
Contact coverage
Mapped contact-channel evidence
Visible profile or company source data includes email and phone channels.
Decision-maker coverage
Partial decision-maker reachability
Some mapped decision-maker signals include visible contact data.
People graph depth
Deep profile graph
2 mapped workforce signals against a 6 employee size estimate.
Peer context
Multi-signal peer benchmark evidence
Peer benchmark combines 10 related companies with peer graph strength, size benchmark, and size position. Underlying peer graph includes 4 evidence types: industry context, employee benchmarks, website records, social profiles.

Domain trust signals

Domain confidence for keaconservation.co.nz is based on website domain and social profile.

35 / 100
Mixed domain alignment Limited domain evidence

Domain evidence combines website domain and social profile; raw email addresses are hidden.

Website domain
keaconservation.co.nz
The official website domain is available from the company source record.
Social profile
LinkedIn organization page
A LinkedIn organization page is present for this company record.
Employee email mismatch: Visible employee email signals do not match the official domain.

AeroLeads coverage snapshot

Profile sample
4
Visible people attached to this company page.
Profile graph depth
Deep profile graph
2 mapped workforce signals against a 6 employee size estimate.
Contactable sample
1
Visible people with email or phone data.
Contact channel mix
Multi-channel contact coverage
Visible profile or company source data includes email and phone channels.
Contact evidence confidence
Mapped contact-channel evidence
Visible profile or company source data includes email and phone channels.
Department coverage
1
Departments represented in AeroLeads workforce signals.
Email domain confidence
Non-official email coverage
Visible email signals use non-official domains only.
Domain confidence
Mixed domain alignment
Domain confidence for keaconservation.co.nz is based on website domain and social profile.
Email usability mix
Professional email coverage sample
AeroLeads source data includes 2 unique visible email signals; 0 are marked current or verified and 2 are professional-type. Raw addresses are hidden.
Contact data safety
Limited privacy-safe contact intelligence
AeroLeads exposes contact counts, channel mix, freshness, and domain-alignment evidence while hiding raw email addresses and masking phone numbers in public output.
Company signal breadth
Multi-signal company record
Company-level signals include social audience, company maturity, and ownership.
Company momentum score
Limited company momentum score
Momentum score blends partial contactability and peer position from AeroLeads company and profile evidence.
Company ownership signal
Nonprofit organization record
Company source record includes source type Nonprofit.
Audience density
Moderate audience density
142 followers against 6 employee estimate, about 23.70 followers per estimated employee.
Specialty signals
1
Specialty tags in the company record.
Market specificity
Tagged market profile
2 category and specialty signals in the company record.
Peer industry clusters
7
Industries represented by related company records.
Related companies
10
Company graph links available for comparison.
Industry benchmark
Evidence-backed industry benchmark
Industry benchmark uses 10 related companies, 4 same-industry peers, 3 benchmark dimensions, and 4 peer evidence types from the AeroLeads related-company graph.
Peer benchmark confidence
Multi-signal peer benchmark evidence
Peer benchmark combines 10 related companies with peer graph strength, size benchmark, and size position. Underlying peer graph includes 4 evidence types: industry context, employee benchmarks, website records, social profiles.
Peer position benchmark
Employee-scale peer position benchmark
Peer-position benchmark shows employee scale above 50% of 10 comparable related peers.
Peer comparison matrix
Limited peer comparison
Compares this company with related-company evidence across employee scale and peer graph evidence.
Workforce locations
4
Locations represented in visible profile signals.
Workforce distribution
Distributed workforce
Visible profile location signals are spread across 4 locations.
Workforce location footprint
Multi-city workforce footprint
Visible profile locations span 4 cities across 1 country, led by Christchurch.
Workforce distribution model
Workforce hub outside company location
The largest visible workforce hub is Christchurch, Canterbury, New Zealand, while the company location is Nz.
Workforce geography evidence confidence
Multi-location workforce geography evidence
Workforce geography spans 4 locations across 4 visible profile signals. Top workforce hub differs from company location.
Workforce seniority tiers
3
Seniority bands derived from visible profile titles and levels.
Seniority evidence confidence
Corroborated seniority evidence
Seniority graph spans 5 classified profile signals across 3 tiers, with reachable evidence for 1. Contributor-heavy visible sample.
Classified seniority profiles
5
Visible profiles with usable seniority signals.
Management-to-IC proxy
Contributor-heavy visible sample
1 managerial seniority signal and 4 contributor signals appear in the visible seniority-classified sample.
Role title diversity
Diverse role title sample
5 distinct role titles across 5 visible titled profiles.
Visible role titles
5
Distinct role titles found in visible profile signals.
Decision-maker signals
3
Visible profiles matching seniority or leadership title patterns.
Decision-maker reachability
Partial decision-maker reachability
Some mapped decision-maker signals include visible contact data.
Decision-maker contactability rate
33.30
Percent of mapped decision-maker signals with visible contact data.
Prospecting fit
Actionable prospecting fit
Kea Conservation Trust shows actionable prospecting fit based on person-level contact coverage, decision-maker coverage, people graph depth, and peer context.
ICP fit
Research ICP fit
Kea Conservation Trust matches the research ICP fit band for common outbound filters based on company size, market specificity, and contactability.
Account research checklist
Source-backed account research checklist
Account research checklist combines person-level contact coverage, ICP fit, related-company graph, domain trust, and people graph depth; raw contact values are hidden.
Intelligence signal groups
13
AeroLeads signal groups available for this company.

Market focus signals

Primary industry
Environmental Services
Market specificity
Tagged market profile
2 category and specialty signals in the company record.
Market evidence tier
High-confidence market evidence
Market evidence combines 7 classification signals from categories, specialties, related peer industries, and description keywords. 2 description-backed keyword signals are included.
Industry benchmark
Evidence-backed industry benchmark
Industry benchmark uses 10 related companies, 4 same-industry peers, 3 benchmark dimensions, and 4 peer evidence types from the AeroLeads related-company graph.
Top peer industry
Environmental Services
40% of 10 related peer industry signals.
Peer benchmark evidence
Multi-signal peer benchmark evidence
Peer benchmark combines 10 related companies with peer graph strength, size benchmark, and size position. Underlying peer graph includes 4 evidence types: industry context, employee benchmarks, website records, social profiles.
Size position
Near peer median size
5 related employee-estimated peers are higher and 5 are lower.
Peer graph strength
Benchmark-ready peer graph
Related peer graph has industry context, employee benchmarks, website records, and social profiles across 10 related companies.
Benchmark dimensions: peer graph strength, size benchmark, and size position.
Categories
Environmental Services
Specialties
Inspiring communities to protect kea
Product-market keyword evidence
Structured market keywords
Keyword evidence comes from 3 source field groups: Category, Specialty, Description.
Product-market keyword evidence tier: Corroborated product-market keyword evidence. Product-market keyword evidence combines 4 unique market keywords, 3 source field groups, and 2 description-backed keywords (1 category, 1 specialty, and 2 description).
Environmental Services · Category Inspiring communities to protect kea · Specialty was set · Description nestor notabilis · Description
Related peer industries
Peer-industry evidence tier: High-confidence peer-industry evidence. Peer-industry evidence combines 10 related companies, 5 peer-industry clusters, and top peer industry Environmental Services at 40.0%.
Environmental Services 4 peers
40.0% of related peer industries
Non-profit Organization Management 1 peer
10.0% of related peer industries
Non-profit Organizations 1 peer
10.0% of related peer industries
Think Tanks 1 peer
10.0% of related peer industries
Retail 1 peer
10.0% of related peer industries

Company signals

Company signal breadth
Multi-signal company record
Company-level signals include social audience, company maturity, and ownership.
Corroborated company record evidence: Company record evidence combines 3 source-backed company signal types: social audience, company maturity, and ownership.
Social audience
142
Followers in the company source record.
Social audience evidence tier: Limited social-audience evidence. Social audience evidence uses 142 followers from source field social_followers.
Audience density
Moderate audience density
142 followers against 6 employee estimate, about 23.70 followers per estimated employee.
Audience-density evidence tier: Limited audience-density evidence. Audience-density evidence combines 142 social followers, 6 employee estimate, and 23.70 followers per estimated employee.
Company maturity
Mature company record
Company source record includes founding year 2006, about 20 years before 2026.
Company maturity evidence tier: Long-running maturity evidence. Maturity evidence combines founding year 2006, 20 years of company history, and source field founded.
Company ownership
Nonprofit organization record
Company source record includes source type Nonprofit.
Company ownership evidence tier: Structured ownership evidence. Ownership evidence combines source type Nonprofit from structured company source fields.

Workforce composition

General 2 signals
100.0% of mapped department signals

Workforce seniority mix

Aggregated from 5 classified profile signals.

Largest seniority band
Senior / Lead
2 of 5 classified profile signals.
Corroborated seniority evidence: Seniority graph spans 5 classified profile signals across 3 tiers, with reachable evidence for 1. Contributor-heavy visible sample.
Management-to-IC proxy
Contributor-heavy visible sample
20.0%
managerial seniority signals
80.0%
contributor seniority signals
1 managerial seniority signal and 4 contributor signals appear in the visible seniority-classified sample.
Management-shape evidence tier: Contributor-heavy management-shape evidence. Management-shape evidence combines 5 seniority-classified signals, 1 managerial signal, 20.0% managerial share, and 4 contributor signals.
Senior / Lead 2 profiles
40.0% of classified seniority signals
Individual contributor 2 profiles
40.0% of classified seniority signals
Manager 1 profile
20.0% of classified seniority signals, 1 with visible contact data

Workforce geography

Aggregated from 4 visible profile location signals.

Workforce geography evidence
Multi-location workforce geography evidence
Workforce geography spans 4 locations across 4 visible profile signals. Top workforce hub differs from company location.
Distribution signal
Distributed workforce
Visible profile location signals are spread across 4 locations.
Workforce distribution model
Workforce hub outside company location
The largest visible workforce hub is Christchurch, Canterbury, New Zealand, while the company location is Nz.
Corroborated workforce model evidence: Workforce model evidence combines 4 located profile signals, 4 workforce locations, 4 cities, 1 country, top hub Christchurch, Canterbury, New Zealand at 25%, and company-location alignment.
Locations
4
Countries
1
Top hub share
25%
Workforce location footprint
Multi-city workforce footprint
Visible profile locations span 4 cities across 1 country, led by Christchurch.
Cities
4
Countries
1
Company-location alignment
Top workforce hub differs from company location
The largest visible workforce location is Christchurch, Canterbury, New Zealand, while the company location is Nz.
Top workforce hub share: 25.0%
Company-location evidence tier: Workforce-location divergence evidence. Company-location alignment evidence combines company location Nz, top workforce hub Christchurch, Canterbury, New Zealand, 25.0% top workforce hub share, and location difference.
Christchurch, Canterbury, New Zealand 1 profile
25.0% of visible location signals
Motueka Valley, Tasman, New Zealand 1 profile
25.0% of visible location signals
Canterbury, New Zealand 1 profile
25.0% of visible location signals
Queenstown, Otago, New Zealand 1 profile
25.0% of visible location signals

Decision-maker coverage

3 seniority signals, 1 with visible contact data.

Decision-maker evidence tier
Mapped decision-maker evidence
Decision-maker evidence covers 3 seniority signals, 1 reachable.
Partial decision-maker reachability 33.3%
Some mapped decision-maker signals include visible contact data.
Decision-maker reachability evidence tier: Partial decision-maker reachability evidence. Decision-maker reachability evidence combines 1 contactable decision-maker signal, 3 mapped decision-maker signals, 33.3% contactability, and 1 dual-channel signal.
Email and phone decision-maker coverage: Mapped decision-maker signals include 1 email signal, 1 phone signal, and 1 with both channels.
Most reachable seniority
Manager
1 of 1 seniority signals include visible contact data.
Seniority reachability evidence tier: Mapped seniority reachability evidence. Seniority reachability evidence combines 1 contactable Manager signal, 1 Manager signal, 100.0% tier contactability, and email and phone coverage.
Senior / Lead 2 profiles
66.7% of mapped seniority signals
Manager 1 profile
33.3% of mapped seniority signals, 1 with visible contact data

Role and function mix

5 visible titled profiles across 5 distinct role titles.

Title mix
Diverse role title sample
5 distinct role titles across 5 visible titled profiles.
Role-title evidence tier: Diverse role-title evidence. Role-title diversity evidence combines 5 visible titled profiles, 5 distinct role titles, and top title Chairperson at Kea Conservation Trust at 20.0%.
Chairperson at Kea Conservation Trust 1 profile
20.0% of visible titled profiles
Digital Project Manager / Scrum Master 1 profile
20.0% of visible titled profiles
Kea Conservation Trust 1 profile
20.0% of visible titled profiles
Principal Advisor Collaboration 1 profile
20.0% of visible titled profiles
Senior Lecturer and Academic Leader 1 profile
20.0% of visible titled profiles

Contactability signals

Contactability score 25.0%
1 of 4 visible profiles include email or phone signals.
Contact channel mix
Multi-channel contact coverage
Visible profile or company source data includes email and phone channels.
Contact evidence tier
Mapped contact-channel evidence
Visible profile or company source data includes email and phone channels.
Contact data safety
Limited privacy-safe contact intelligence
AeroLeads exposes contact counts, channel mix, freshness, and domain-alignment evidence while hiding raw email addresses and masking phone numbers in public output.
Aggregate signals
1
Channel coverage
Email and phone aggregate coverage
Evidence groups
1
Limited contact-safety evidence: Contact-safety evidence combines visible profile contact sample; public schema uses aggregate variables only.
Aggregate-only contact schema: Dataset variables use counts, rates, channel labels, freshness bands, and domain-alignment metrics instead of raw contact values.
Email usability mix
Professional email coverage sample
AeroLeads source data includes 2 unique visible email signals; 0 are marked current or verified and 2 are professional-type. Raw addresses are hidden.
Email usability evidence tier: Sample email usability evidence. Email usability evidence combines 2 unique email signals and 2 professional-type; raw addresses are hidden.
0 current or verified 2 professional-type 0.0% current signal rate
Visible people
4
With contact data
1
Email coverage
1
25.0% of visible profiles
Phone coverage
1
25.0% of visible profiles

Email domain intelligence

0 of 2 visible email signals match keaconservation.co.nz.

Non-official email coverage: Visible email signals use non-official domains only.
Email identity evidence tier: Non-official email identity evidence. Email identity evidence combines 2 visible email signals and 2 other-domain signals.
0.0% domain match 0 people with official-domain email 2 non-official email signals
The Kea Conservation Trust was set up in 2006 to assist in conservation of kea (Nestor notabilis).
Explore visible people signals for Kea Conservation Trust by role, title, or keyword.

1 of 4 visible profiles include email or phone signals in AeroLeads.

Kea Conservation Trust Questions

Kea Conservation Trust people graph sample